[03:26]  * dipankar says hello to all
[03:26] <dipankar> lfaraone, around?
[03:30] <lfaraone> dipankar: yessir.
[03:30] <dipankar> lfaraone, I got something in flipsticks activity
[03:30] <lfaraone> dipankar: oh?
[03:30] <dipankar> lfaraone, alsroot told that the toolkit dependency is missing
[03:31] <dipankar> lfaraone, he mentioned the following:
[03:31] <dipankar> "
[03:31] <dipankar> Looks like package does not contain toolkit dependency.
[03:31] <dipankar> Anyway toolkit is out-dated and will be replaced by polyol. For now, you
[03:31] <dipankar> can use "fully-bundled" brnach on
[03:31] <dipankar> "
[03:32] <lfaraone> alsroot: do you mean python-sugar-toolkit?
[03:42] <dipankar> lfaraone, meanwhile can you help me with this last lintian warning?
[03:42] <dipankar> http://paste.ubuntu.com/470501/
[03:42] <dipankar> The package is Sugar Log Activity
[03:43] <lfaraone> dipankar: okay. did you declare DEB_SUGAR_BRANCHES in debian/rules and regen control?
[03:44] <dipankar> lfaraone, yup. here is the rules file: http://paste.ubuntu.com/470502/
[04:00] <lfaraone> dipankar: you changed the name of the package in rules to sugar-log-activity-0.86 but didn't make the change to the control or changelog files.
[04:02] <dipankar> lfaraone, actually I had confusion over that.
[04:03] <dipankar> lfaraone, in the changelog: the first entry is of some other name
[04:05] <dipankar> lfaraone, shall I keep this too in the changelog:
[04:05] <dipankar> "
[04:05] <dipankar> sugar-log-activity (6-0ubuntu1) hardy; urgency=low
[04:05] <dipankar>   * Initial upload to Ubuntu
[04:05] <dipankar>  -- Jani Monoses <jani@ubuntu.com>  Sat, 08 Dec 2007 21:51:00 +0200
[04:05] <dipankar> "
[04:06] <dipankar> I had the doubt that we are uploading the package to Debian, but this entry is for Ubuntu
[04:11] <dipankar> lfaraone, now I am having these warnings:
[04:11] <dipankar> "
[04:11] <dipankar> Now running lintian...
[04:11] <dipankar> W: sugar-log-activity-0.86 source: package-lacks-versioned-build-depends-on-debhelper 5
[04:11] <dipankar> W: sugar-log-activity-0.86: unknown-locale-code mvo
[04:11] <dipankar> W: sugar-log-activity-0.86: unknown-locale-code pis
[04:11] <dipankar> W: sugar-log-activity-0.86: unknown-locale-code tzo
[04:11] <dipankar> Finished running lintian.
[04:11] <dipankar> "
[04:12] <lfaraone> dipankar: wellm, the package is based off the Ubuntu version, right?
[04:12] <lfaraone> dipankar: so it's probably okay to leave the ubuntu changes in there.
[04:12] <dipankar> ok
[04:12] <lfaraone> dipankar: I think both those warnings have been discussed on the mailing list.
[04:13] <dipankar> ok, I will go through the mails
[04:14] <lfaraone> .dipankar: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.laptop.olpc.debian.devel/22
[04:14] <lfaraone> dipankar: * rather, you want to read http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.laptop.olpc.debian.devel/226
[04:15] <dipankar> thanks, I was looking for ankur's query only.
[05:18] <dipankar> lfaraone, Thanks for the link
[05:19] <lfaraone> dipankar: happy to help.
[05:19] <dipankar> lfaraone, I also found the mail in which you discussed about the first warning with Jonas
[05:19] <dipankar> lfaraone, i guess you would be going to bed now
[05:20] <lfaraone> dipankar: yep, let me know if you have any questions and I'll get to them in the morning.
[05:20] <dipankar> I will make changes in the package and add it for review then but evening (IST)
[05:20] <dipankar> See you soon
[05:20] <dipankar> :)
[05:20] <dipankar> Goodnight
[12:01] <dfarning> Manusheel, good morning
[12:02] <Manusheel> dfarning: Good morning.
[13:26] <Manusheel> dipankar: Hi Dipankar.
[13:26] <Manusheel> Around?
[13:27] <dipankar> Manusheel, Hello Sir
[13:27] <Manusheel> dipankar: Hello. Thanks for the e-mail to Luke.
[13:28] <Manusheel> Where do we have a confusion?
[13:28] <dipankar> Manusheel, Initially Luke told me to ask Neeraj what he did for the 0.86 & 0.88 compatibility
[13:29] <Manusheel> dipankar: Ok.
[13:29] <dipankar> when I asked him, he told me to change the .orig tar ball names
[13:29] <dipankar> in pristine tar branch
[13:29] <Manusheel> dipankar: Yes.
[13:29] <Manusheel> That needs to be renamed.
[13:29] <dipankar> I have done that
[13:30] <Manusheel> dipankar: Let me send you some documentation that Kandarp and Neeraj prepared.
[13:30] <Manusheel> I hope that helps.
[13:30] <dipankar> ok. That will be helpful. That might answer to my my question "Why we need to rename it there?"
[13:32] <lfaraone> afternoon.
[13:33] <Manusheel> lfaraone: Good afternoon.
[13:33] <lfaraone> dipankar: well, dpkg expects that there is a source tarball which matches the pattern <packaga name>_<version>.orig.tar.{gz, bz2, lzma} in the directory immediately above the unpacked package source.
[13:33] <dipankar> hey lfaraone, good morning
[13:33] <lfaraone> dipankar: and pristine-tar is happy to oblidge by generating such a tarball using the stored tarball information it carrys in the git pristine-tar branch.
[13:33] <lfaraone> dipankar: thanks.
[13:34] <lfaraone> dipankar: so when it notices that it can't find such a file, either because you haven't imported the tarball or becasue the tarball name does not match the package name, it errors out.
[13:34] <dipankar> lfaraone, if you could pull in my pristine branch of log activity: http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/sugar-log-activity.git;a=shortlog
[13:35] <dipankar> There are two different names in the pristine branch
[13:36] <dipankar> lfaraone, I am getting these in listing:
[13:36] <dipankar> "
[13:36] <dipankar> dipankar@dipankar-laptop:~/sugar-log-activity$ ls
[13:36] <dipankar> debian
[13:36] <dipankar> locale
[13:36] <dipankar> sugar-logviewer-activity_23.orig.tar.bz2.delta
[13:36] <dipankar> sugar-logviewer-activity_23.orig.tar.bz2.id
[13:36] <dipankar> sugar-logviewer-activity_6.orig.tar.gz.delta
[13:36] <dipankar> sugar-logviewer-activity_6.orig.tar.gz.id
[13:36] <dipankar> "
[13:37] <lfaraone> dipankar: right. why do you think there are two files each with each listed version?
[13:38] <lfaraone> or even two versions at all.
[13:38] <Manusheel> lfaraone: Will it be possible for you to review record, jigsaw puzzle and irc?
[13:38] <lfaraone> Manusheel: Yes.
[13:38] <Manusheel> lfaraone: Thank you. Appreciate your support.
[13:40] <dipankar> lfaraone, is it due to different extension? I am not sure though
[13:40] <dipankar> But that doesn't make sense
[13:40] <dipankar> :(
[13:40] <dipankar> lfaraone, is it due to the fact that I imported v23 in the existing v6 of the activity?
[13:41] <lfaraone> dipankar: yeah.
[13:42] <dipankar> lfaraone, Then I made some mistake in importing :(
[13:42] <lfaraone> dipankar: there's no real reason to remove the old versions, since they take up almost zero disk space as is.
[13:42] <lfaraone> dipankar: no, that's not a problem to have more than one.
[13:42] <dipankar> lfaraone, then they are supposed to be coming like this only?
[13:43] <dipankar> I mean when I further upgrade, they will keep on adding the tar balls?
[13:43] <lfaraone> dipankar: take a look at the pristine-tar branch of sugar-0.88
[13:44] <lfaraone> dipankar: http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/sugar.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/pristine-tar;hb=pristine-tar
[13:44] <dipankar> * ohk I get it.
[13:44] <dipankar> HUGE list
[13:45] <lfaraone> dipankar: yeah. the reason you're getting an error is because there's no sugar-logviewer-activity-0.86_23.orig.tar.bz2.{delta,id}.
[13:45] <dipankar> lfaraone, shall I rename it then?
[13:46] <lfaraone> dipankar: so the easiest way is to git mv the files (only of the latest version, mind you, no real need to touch the other two) to the "proper" name.
[13:46] <dipankar> *I remember changing it though
[13:46] <lfaraone> dipankar: yes. I think there's a post by me that covers that on one of the lists.
[13:47] <Manusheel> lfaraone: Did you get a chance to look at https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-sugarteam/2010-July/002015.html? Is there a tutorial on syncing Debian packages to Ubuntu 10.10?
[13:47] <Manusheel> lfaraone: We would like to get started on it.
[13:47] <dipankar> lfaraone, Now I remember. I was having a confusion whether to put version number in the name!
[13:48] <lfaraone> Manusheel: I have not looked at it yet, but looking at it now, it's a very good example of a sync request. Granted, the explanation could be a bit more... explanaining, but c'est la vie.
[13:49] <Manusheel> lfaraone: Yes, it is indeed a good example of sync request. Some more explanation would be hellpful.
[13:50] <lfaraone> Manusheel: I talked to kandarpk about it yesterday, http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/07/28/%23ubuntu-sugarteam.html#t17:05
[13:51] <lfaraone> Manusheel: but, in all honesty, 'requestsync' makes it so dead simple that there's not much space to mess up :)
[13:51] <Manusheel> lfaraone: Thank you. This is a very good starting point.
[13:52] <Manusheel> lfaraone: yes :-) Completely agree.
[13:53] <dipankar> lfaraone, just a question: The activity name was changed to Log from Logviewer. So, shouldn't I change it to : sugar-log-activity-0.86_23.orig.tar.bz2.{delta,id}.
[13:53] <lfaraone> dipankar: yes.
[13:53] <dipankar> ok
[13:55] <dipankar> lfaraone, how do I commit these changes? -- Return back to master branch and run " git commit -a"?
[13:56] <lfaraone> dipankar: no, you'll commit them in the pristine-tar branch.
[13:56] <dipankar> ok
[13:56] <lfaraone> dipankar: since it's  a git mv command, the changes area automatically staged, so you don't need to use -a
[13:56] <dipankar> oops I missed git in git mv :(
[13:57] <dipankar> then I think I need to run git commit -a
[14:00] <dipankar> lfaraone, I have pushed the changes to git repo
[14:00] <lfaraone> dipankar: does the package build?
[14:01] <dipankar> just a sec
[14:01] <dipankar> oh no. It didnot work
[14:03] <dipankar> lfaraone, here is the error: http://paste.ubuntu.com/470692/
[14:04] <dipankar> I tried running "clean command"
[14:04] <dipankar> but also didn't work
[14:09] <lfaraone> dipankar: what does "git rm debian/sugar-log-activity -r" do for you?
[14:09] <dipankar> lfaraone, the o/p: http://paste.ubuntu.com/470695/
[14:11] <lfaraone> dipankar: cool, somehow those files got added. git commit that and try building again.
[14:12] <dipankar> lfaraone, how come they were there? I ran "fakeroot debian/rules clean" :(
[14:12] <dipankar> before building package
[14:13] <lfaraone> dipankar: because those files are from an interrupted pacakage build, they should have been automatically removed.
[14:14] <dipankar> lfaraone, still the same: http://paste.ubuntu.com/470696/
[14:14] <lfaraone> dipankar: no, it's different.
[14:14] <lfaraone> dipankar: in this case, the only real error is line 5.
[14:14] <dipankar> ok :)
[14:14] <lfaraone> dipankar: it's saying you have a binary file which shouldn't be there.
[14:15] <dipankar> lfaraone, there are two files in the tree source though
[14:16] <dipankar> http://paste.ubuntu.com/470699/
[14:16] <dipankar> lfaraone, ^^ the {delta,id} files shouldn't be here I guess
[14:16] <dipankar> the were originally not there
[14:17] <lfaraone> dipankar: right. they're supposed to be in the pristine-tar only
[14:17] <dipankar> yeah
[14:17] <dipankar> lfaraone, shall I remove them then?
[14:18] <lfaraone> dipankar: yes.
[14:20] <dipankar> lfaraone, great! now it is running
[14:21] <dipankar> lfaraone, btw did you get a chance to check the e-mail I sent today? It was regarding the lintian warnings only
[14:22] <dipankar> i am still getting these:
[14:22] <dipankar> "
[14:22] <dipankar> Now running lintian...
[14:22] <dipankar> W: sugar-log-activity-0.86 source: package-lacks-versioned-build-depends-on-debhelper 5
[14:22] <dipankar> W: sugar-log-activity-0.86: unknown-locale-code mvo
[14:22] <dipankar> W: sugar-log-activity-0.86: unknown-locale-code pis
[14:22] <dipankar> W: sugar-log-activity-0.86: unknown-locale-code tzo
[14:22] <dipankar> Finished running lintian.
[14:22] <dipankar> "
[14:22] <dipankar> lfaraone, From the mails and links, I think I can safely ignore them.
[14:22] <lfaraone> dipankar: yes.
[14:24] <dipankar> lfaraone, shall I assume, the Log-activity is now properly packaged?
[14:24] <dipankar> :P
[14:25] <lfaraone> dipankar: you know what they say about when you assume...
[14:25] <lfaraone> :)
[14:26] <dipankar> lfaraone, ohk :) I have marked it for review on Sugar/tasks
[14:30] <dipankar> lfaraone, Now I should move to Flipsticks-activity
[14:30] <dipankar> alsroot, hi, you around?
[14:31] <alsroot> dipankar: yup
[14:32] <dipankar> alsroot, it would be great if you could explain you reply a bit more to the flipsticks startup problem query...
[14:32] <dipankar> "
[14:32] <dipankar> Looks like package does not contain toolkit dependency.
[14:32] <dipankar> Anyway toolkit is out-dated and will be replaced by polyol. For now, you
[14:32] <dipankar> can use "fully-bundled" brnach on
[14:32] <dipankar> "
[14:33] <dipankar> alsroot, lfaraone was asking about whether it is python-sugar-toolkit.
[14:34] <alsroot> dipankar: the thing is, I was experimenting w/ 0sugar e.g. tried to create "smart" bundles (they contained 0isntall implementations per arch etc.) and toolkit (not python-sugar-toolkit) dependency was bundled in such way
[14:37] <alsroot> ..for now, you can just use fully-bundled branch or tarball to follow regular packaging procedures (w/o any 0sugar)
[14:37] <dipankar> alsroot, I actually used the tarball, debianized the folder and then tried building the package
[14:38] <dipankar> the package builds properly
[14:38] <dipankar> but the activity after installation doesn't work
[14:39] <lfaraone> dipankar: right, because it depends on something that isn't packaged yet.
[14:39] <lfaraone> dipankar: so alsroot is suggesting to instead source your work from a branch which contains the something, embedded.
[14:39] <lfaraone> alsroot: is it infeasable to package the toolkit separately, not worth doing, or what?
[14:40] <alsroot> lfaraone: toolkit dependecy is obsolete and will be replaced by the same polyol
[14:40] <kandarpk> lfaraone, dfarning: Good morning
[14:40] <kandarpk> dipankar: hi
[14:40] <alsroot> kandarpk: so, for now, it will be easier to use just bundled version
[14:40] <alsroot> lfaraone: ^
[14:40] <dipankar> kandarpk, hi :)
[14:41] <lfaraone> alsroot: right, makes sense. should we hold off on flipsticks until then, rather than embed a bundled version?
[14:41] <lfaraone> hey kandarpk .
[14:41] <kandarpk> alsroot: hi
[14:41]  * lfaraone thinks that might be the best route.
[14:42] <kandarpk> lfaraone: have you updated the initial-debianization tarball ?
[14:42] <lfaraone> kandarpk: no, I haven't.
[14:42] <lfaraone> kandarpk: personally, although the tarball is a good start, I usually like to begin from the debian/ of an existing package that does what I want already.
[14:43] <kandarpk> lfaraone: Ok, but weren't you planning to update it ?
[14:43] <alsroot> lfaraone: the thing is, polyol, itself, is not yet released, and its python API is different, I was planing to support current API only in polyol-2 (i.e. not right tomorrow :)
[14:44] <kandarpk> lfaraone: I've to document the steps involved in packaging
[14:44] <lfaraone> alsroot: okay, well, no rush.
[14:44] <lfaraone> dfarning: rather than bundling toolkit, I think it might be a good idea just to hold off on flipsticvks.
[14:45] <dipankar> lfaraone, I guess that was for me ^^
[14:45] <dipankar> :P
[14:46] <lfaraone> dfarning: thoughts?
[14:46] <lfaraone> dfarning: well, I'm asking dfarning whether he's okay with taht.
[14:46] <dipankar> ok
[14:59]  * dipankar is away: Be Right Back
[14:59] <caroline_> good morning
[14:59] <caroline_> was someone looking for me?
[15:02]  * ankur_ says net connectivity is not good due to rains and might get disconnected
[15:02] <ankur_> hi lfaraone
[15:03] <ankur_> around>?
[15:03] <lfaraone> alsroot: yes.
[15:04] <ankur_> lfaraone,  well i needed to do some changes to irc activity
[15:04] <lfaraone> ankur_: okay.
[15:05] <ankur_> what i need to do is now to undo the change made
[15:05] <ankur_> to
[15:05] <ankur_> git
[15:05] <ankur_> package
[15:05] <lfaraone> uh?
[15:05] <ankur_> actually i did some changes to source code by changing execute bits of four file
[15:07] <lfaraone> ankur_: right, that's not terrible. you can undo it easily.
[15:09]  * dipankar is back (gone 00:10:51)
[15:10]  * dipankar suggests ankur_ to get some other isp
[15:10] <dipankar> lfaraone, so we have to halt on flipsticks?
[15:12] <lfaraone> dipankar: I guess so, for now.
[15:12] <dipankar> lfaraone, any other activity that needs attention? I can help in that.
[15:17] <dfarning> lfaraone, plus one to flipsticks
[15:17] <dfarning> lfaraone, plus one to flipsticks
[15:20] <lfaraone> dfarning: mk.
[15:20] <lfaraone> dipankar: I appreciate your enthusiasm, but I don't have anything for you at the moment :)
[15:20] <dipankar> ohk :)
[15:32]  * lfaraone is taking a 15 minute brunch.
[15:38]  * lfaraone returned.
[15:39] <dfarning> dipankar, are you out of things to work on?
[15:39] <dfarning> dipankar, are you out of things to work on?
[15:40] <dipankar> dfarning, I am helping ankur with paint-activity and also starting with documentation on packaging activities
[15:40] <dfarning> very weird I am using ubuntu 10.10 and xchat sometime douple posts things:)
[15:40] <dipankar> I thought ankur could use a helping hand
[15:40] <dipankar> :)
[15:41] <dipankar> dfarning, yeah, i was also observing that. Pretty weird
[15:41] <dfarning> dipankar, very nice as soon as possiable we should move the documentaion on packaging activities to the wiki
[15:42] <dipankar> sure
[15:42] <lfaraone> dfarning: re surf, surf depends on python-gi, but when python-gi is installed sugar-emulator crashes.
[15:43] <dfarning> dipankar, thanks we want every one to benifit from the documentation you guys are writing.
[15:43] <dfarning> lfaraone, what looks like the best way forward?
[15:44] <lfaraone> dfarning: file a bug against sugar and hope there's someone smart enough to know the solution :)
[15:45] <dfarning> lfaraone, +1 and can you ask rgs_ to look at it.  he is on a hacker retreat so can dig into hard problems like this:)
[15:46] <lfaraone> will do.
[15:46] <dfarning> lfaraone, thanks
[15:49] <lfaraone> dfarning: bug reported, should be arriving in mailboxes soonish.
[15:49] <lfaraone> rgs_: poke.
[15:49] <dipankar> lfaraone, dfarning : Ankur's internet is giving trouble due to the heavy rains that took place here
[15:49] <lfaraone> dipankar: yeah, he told me.
[15:49] <dipankar> * He told me to convey this msg :)
[15:51] <dfarning> dipankar, thanks it will take a while to work out the kinks as people move and go mack to school.
[15:51] <lfaraone> dfarning: don't worry, you'll have me for another month
[15:51] <dfarning> lfaraone, thanks
[15:51] <dipankar> dfarning, yeah . lfaraone is here to handle the things :P
[15:51] <dipankar> just kidding
[15:52] <dipankar> We just need sometime to work things out
[15:52] <dipankar> :)
[15:52] <dipankar> Then we will back in full
[15:54] <dipankar> lfaraone, you mentioned shell.log attached in the mail in mailing list. But I didn't find any.
[15:54] <dipankar> do I need to open any link to get that shell.log?
[15:54] <lfaraone> dipankar: oops, thanks for the catch.
[15:55] <dipankar> np, glad I went through the mail
[15:57]  * lfaraone is off, talk to you in the PM.
[16:08] <manusheel> kandarpk: Hi kandarp.
[16:08] <manusheel> Around
[16:08] <manusheel> ?
[16:08] <kandarpk> manusheel sir: yes sir.
[16:09] <manusheel> kandarpk: Did you get a chance to talk to Dipankar and Neeraj on figuring out how to request for review at tasks page?
[16:11] <kandarpk> manusheel sir: Sir, I got it myself, just had to add some comment after making changes.
[16:11] <kandarpk> manusheel sir: I've added info. regarding speak there
[16:13] <manusheel> kandarpk: Great.
[16:13] <manusheel> That is neat.
[16:47] <manusheel> lfaraone: Hi Luke.
[16:47] <manusheel> Around?
[16:48] <manusheel> neeraj: Hi Neeraj.
[16:48] <manusheel> Around?
[16:53] <neeraj> manusheel sir: yes
[16:53] <manusheel> neeraj: Did we test hello mesh package?
[16:53] <manusheel> What were the results?
[16:55] <neeraj> manusheel: I asked kandarp sir whether he knew how to connect our sugar and test the package..
[16:55] <neeraj> dipankar: Do u have ny idea how can we do that?
[16:57] <manusheel> dipankar: around?
[17:02] <manusheel> neeraj: Send an e-mail to Tomeu about it.
[17:02] <manusheel> Copy Dipankar, me and Kandarp on it.
[17:04] <manusheel> neeraj: I would like you to get familiar with two things today -
[17:04] <manusheel> Ubuntu bug tracker.
[17:05] <manusheel> 2. v
[17:05] <manusheel> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SyncRequestProcess
[17:05] <dfarning> manusheel, please cc the sugar team mailing list.  Tomeu would prefer to answer questions on public lists rather than private mails.
[17:06] <neeraj> manusheel sir: Ok.. I will leave for  dinner now and look at the above two things..
[17:06] <neeraj> brb in 10-15 min
[17:08] <manusheel> dfarning: +1
[17:08] <manusheel> Thank you for the pointer.
[17:11] <manusheel> Please let me know.
[17:11] <manusheel> lfaraone: Did you get a chance to review Record, jigsaw puzzle and IRC today?
[17:13] <rgs_> lfaraone: interesting. will look into it later.
[17:34]  * dipankar is back from dinner
[17:34] <dipankar> manusheel, Sir, I was off to have dinner
[17:35] <dipankar> neeraj, you around
[17:35] <dipankar> ?
[17:35] <neeraj> dipankar: yes
[17:36] <dipankar> neeraj, what were you asking?
[17:36] <dipankar> regarding connecting the activity..
[17:37] <neeraj> dipankar: I was saying that do u know how we can share activity online?
[17:37] <neeraj> activities running in our sugar-emulator
[17:37] <dipankar> neeraj, its the same with every activity
[17:37] <dipankar> :
[17:37] <dipankar> there will be a circle with one dot in it
[17:37] <dipankar> on the top menu
[17:37] <dipankar> in the activity
[17:38] <neeraj> dipankar: yes but if u share an activity
[17:38] <dipankar> click on it and check the neighbourhood option
[17:38] <dipankar> ok
[17:38] <neeraj> then how can I see it?.. we need to be connected to same server.. no?
[17:39] <dipankar> yup
[17:40] <neeraj> dipankar: lets try using this http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Community_Jabber_Servers
[17:40] <dipankar> for that we need to be on same server
[17:41] <dipankar> neeraj_, use the first one:
[17:41] <dipankar> jabber.laptop.org
[17:42] <dipankar> I am on the ^^ server through emulator.
[17:44] <neeraj_> dipankar, I have also added this server
[17:45] <dipankar> but I see nobody!
[17:45] <dipankar> neeraj_, are you finding anybody online?
[17:45] <dfarning> manusheel, lets package exelearning for debain and ubutu it should be pretty straight forward.
[17:46] <dfarning> manusheel, the source is at http://exelearning.org/wiki
[17:59] <neeraj_> dipankar, no..
[18:00] <dipankar> neeraj_, I need to head to bed
[18:00]  * dipankar says good night and great day to all
[22:44] <lfaraone> manusheel: I didn't review IRC because no review was requested.
[22:53] <dfarning_> lfaraone can you take a look at EXE learning and see if it would be possiable to package?  http://exelearning.org/wiki
[22:54]  * lfaraone looks.
[22:54]  * lfaraone will be back, going on the rocks.