| ScottL | crimsun_, TheMuso : if i'm testing an SRU is it/there.... | 00:54 |
|---|---|---|
| ScottL | * bad form to verify my own SRU? | 00:54 |
| ScottL | * a special wording when replying to an SRU? | 00:54 |
| ScottL | * a special tag to add to the SRU? | 00:54 |
| ScottL | * anything else i'm ignorant about replying to an SRU? | 00:55 |
| TheMuso | ScottL: 1) no, 2) no, just indicate that you have tested the fix as compared to the previous package behavior, and that you have verified that the fix works etc 3) change verification-needed to verification-done but can't remember whether universe packages need 2 ACKS. If so, and nobody else has ACKed, leave tags alone 4) thats all. | 00:59 |
| ScottL | thanks TheMuso :) | 01:22 |
| ScottL | now i'm working on the ardour mute SRU and trying to figure out why my patch caused only the i386 build to fail in lucid-proposed | 01:23 |
| ScottL | i was starting with a test build of the source directly from launchpad in a chroot environment and having trouble getting it to build to my surprise | 01:24 |
| ScottL | building the source gives me a control and a nice baseline | 01:25 |
| ScottL | but then i realized that i had downloaded the source from maverick :/ that explains why a package version wasn't available :P | 01:25 |
| TheMuso | heh | 01:41 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!