[00:54] <ScottL> crimsun_, TheMuso : if i'm testing an SRU is it/there....
[00:54] <ScottL>  * bad form to verify my own SRU?
[00:54] <ScottL>  * a special wording when replying to an SRU?
[00:54] <ScottL>  * a special tag to add to the SRU?
[00:55] <ScottL>  * anything else i'm ignorant about replying to an SRU?
[00:59] <TheMuso> ScottL: 1) no, 2) no, just indicate that you have tested the fix as compared to the previous package behavior, and that you have verified that the fix works etc 3) change verification-needed to verification-done but can't remember whether universe packages need 2 ACKS. If so, and nobody else has ACKed, leave tags alone 4) thats all.
[01:22] <ScottL> thanks TheMuso :)
[01:23] <ScottL> now i'm working on the ardour mute SRU and trying to figure out why my patch caused only the i386 build to fail in lucid-proposed
[01:24] <ScottL> i was starting with a test build of the source directly from launchpad in a chroot environment and having trouble getting it to build to my surprise
[01:25] <ScottL> building the source gives me a control and a nice baseline
[01:25] <ScottL> but then i realized that i had downloaded the source from maverick :/   that explains why a package version wasn't available :P
[01:41] <TheMuso> heh