| michaelh1 | Afternoon. How can I get the messages attached to a bug using launchpadlib? | 01:54 |
|---|---|---|
| michaelh1 | I have a bug.messages_collection_link, but trying a luanchpad.load() on that gives an error | 01:54 |
| doctormo | Hey michaelh1 | 01:55 |
| doctormo | Try for message in bug.messages_collection: | 01:55 |
| wgrant | Not messages_collection. Just messages. | 01:56 |
| michaelh1 | Yip, that does it. I didn't see that in the 1.0 API doc. What's the best way of finding such things? | 01:58 |
| wgrant | michaelh1: launchpadlib is magic, and +apidoc doesn't know about the magic. | 01:58 |
| wgrant | *_link and *_collection_link are just URLs. | 01:58 |
| wgrant | launchpadlib works this out, and turns them into more normal attributes that retrieve the contents automatically. | 01:58 |
| michaelh1 | Ah, so where I was using load(task.bug_link), I should use just task.bug | 02:00 |
| wgrant | michaelh1: Exactly. | 02:02 |
| michaelh1 | Is there a way to speed things up by assuming the cache is good? | 02:11 |
| michaelh1 | or other ways of speeding things up when you're writing a new script? | 02:11 |
| lifeless | michaelh1: there is a post about tuning lp api scripts on the launchpad blog | 02:32 |
| lifeless | michaelh1: beyond that, its largely in the lp devs hands to make things faster - which we are doing | 02:32 |
| michaelh1 | lifeless: it's more that I'm running the same script over and over while developing, so could re-use the same data without fetching | 02:38 |
| lifeless | lplib has a cache in it | 02:39 |
| lifeless | so you should already be avoiding some redudant transfer | 02:41 |
| michaelh1 | lifeless: yip, but my data set is read only and (for now) I don't care about upstream changes | 02:45 |
| michaelh1 | It's all good. | 02:45 |
| wgrant | LP rejected a PPA upload because I used a bad team name. | 02:46 |
| wgrant | It has ignored two subsequent uploads to the right name, giving me no response. | 02:46 |
| wgrant | It is correctly signed -- the changes file is identical to the rejected one. | 02:46 |
| tgm4883 | Not sure where I should file this bug against (lauchpad.net or w3m). I filed a bug via the command line which opened up launchpad.net via w3m. I tried to login, multiple links are present on the login page (including cancel), but I have no way to continue. The text where I would expect continue to be a link to submit my credentials appears to just be text, not a link | 02:51 |
| wgrant | spm: Is germanium's process-upload.py somehow unhappy? | 02:51 |
| wgrant | Or its poppy-sftp? | 02:51 |
| lifeless | wgrant: how would I tell ? | 02:52 |
| lifeless | wgrant: spm is awl | 02:52 |
| lifeless | tgm4883: well, both arguably have a problem - I'start with a bug on launchpad-foundations | 02:52 |
| wgrant | lifeless: No idea. | 02:53 |
| wgrant | I guess I'll try cocoplum instead. | 02:53 |
| tgm4883 | lifeless, ok, i'll file one there. Thats where I was leaning anyway since the rest of the links appear to be working. Thanks | 02:53 |
| === hggdh is now known as hggdh|away | ||
| Dies | Anyone else having problems with "pear"? | 03:46 |
| lifeless | ? | 03:49 |
| magcius | oi | 03:51 |
| magcius | Launchpad is running like hell on my Firefox | 03:51 |
| magcius | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg is updating very slowly when scrolling | 03:52 |
| micahg | magcius: nvidia chipset? | 03:52 |
| magcius | micahg: indeed | 03:52 |
| magcius | I'm running a Firefox nightly and I have a few patches for the xserver | 03:52 |
| lifeless | png provoked driver bug IIRC | 03:53 |
| magcius | lifeless: hm? | 03:53 |
| magcius | ok, what the hell? | 03:53 |
| micahg | magcius: known issue, I need to upstream it | 03:53 |
| magcius | https://dev.launchpad.net/ <-- the header background is a solid color png | 03:53 |
| magcius | and it's 1px wide, which is going to cause hell on the browser rendering | 03:54 |
| magcius | any reason you can't use background-color? | 03:54 |
| magcius | lifeless: do you know the cause? | 03:54 |
| magcius | lifeless: I can report it to the team, if you want. | 03:55 |
| wgrant | It won't cause hell -- it's a very normal technique. | 03:55 |
| wgrant | But yes, it should be a background colour. | 03:55 |
| magcius | wgrant: 1px wide is still stupid. | 03:55 |
| lifeless | well, we still support ie6 | 03:56 |
| magcius | ok | 03:56 |
| lifeless | anyhow, I don't know the cause, I just remember a thread somewhere about linux driver bugs causing this behaviour | 03:56 |
| lifeless | micahg: do you have a bug # for magcius ? | 03:56 |
| magcius | I don't run Ubuntu. | 03:56 |
| lifeless | magcius: And ? Its not Ubuntu specific (in fact, I suspect we've fixed it in Ubuntu) | 03:57 |
| magcius | lifeless: hm, how did you fix it? xorg patch? | 03:57 |
| micahg | bug 223238 | 03:57 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 223238 in firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) "Extremely slow Ajax/Javascript/CSS performance in Firefox 3 using non-free nvidia-glx-new (affected: 18, heat: 146)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/223238 | 03:57 |
| magcius | Thanks | 03:57 |
| magcius | oh what the hell | 03:58 |
| magcius | can I have a txt dump of that page, comments, attachments? | 03:58 |
| lifeless | https://launchpad.net/bugs/223238/+text | 03:58 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 223238 in firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) "Extremely slow Ajax/Javascript/CSS performance in Firefox 3 using non-free nvidia-glx-new (affected: 18, heat: 146)" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 03:58 |
| magcius | Thanks | 03:59 |
| magcius | This is why I love LP./ | 03:59 |
| magcius | Except for code hosting. | 03:59 |
| magcius | ok, there's no patches | 04:00 |
| magcius | http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14027687/unnamed <-- oh, thanks | 04:00 |
| micahg | is there anyone around why can score up the chromium and mozilla daily builds? | 06:51 |
| StevenK | Yes, I can. | 06:51 |
| micahg | StevenK: awesome, do you know where they are? | 06:51 |
| StevenK | Nope, I am blissfully unaware | 06:52 |
| StevenK | I'm guessing ubuntu-mozilla-daily somewhere | 06:52 |
| micahg | https://edge.launchpad.net/~chromium-daily/+archive/ppa | 06:52 |
| micahg | https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa/+packages | 06:53 |
| micahg | StevenK: don't bother w/chromium-codecs-ffmpeg as it's broke | 06:53 |
| micahg | StevenK: thanks :) | 06:53 |
| StevenK | You want all of the chromium builds bumped? | 06:53 |
| StevenK | Doesn't it take hours to build? | 06:54 |
| micahg | StevenK: looks like just i386 needs bumping | 06:54 |
| micahg | and for the daily, I think it's an hour | 06:55 |
| micahg | oh, maybe not | 06:55 |
| StevenK | micahg: i386 for hardy, jaunty, karmic, lucid and maverick is where I'm going ... | 06:55 |
| micahg | yeah, between 1-2 hrs depending on which builder I think | 06:55 |
| micahg | maverick build in 1 hr, jaunty in 2 | 06:56 |
| micahg | on amd64 | 06:56 |
| micahg | maybe it's just the small number of builders...not the python stuff | 06:58 |
| micahg | python stuff is still 2400 | 06:58 |
| micahg | StevenK: any idea how long until the PPA bulders come back, i386 is showing 8/1 for build date | 06:58 |
| StevenK | Nope, but they're not usually gone all that long | 06:59 |
| micahg | StevenK: well, if we have to be picky about which builds to rescore, I'd say lucid and maverick | 06:59 |
| StevenK | But yes, you're right, there's 7 amd64 builders and 3 i386 | 06:59 |
| StevenK | micahg: Given there's 3 builders, I'm a little bit retiscent to score up a bunch of stuff that could keep one builder fully occupied for over 24 hours, that's all. | 07:00 |
| micahg | that should only be about 8 hrs of build time | 07:00 |
| micahg | StevenK: no, just lucid and maverick i386 for mozilla daily and chromium daily | 07:01 |
| micahg | that should be around 8 hrs | 07:01 |
| StevenK | That's still 8 hours just for chromium :-) | 07:01 |
| micahg | no, should be 2-4 | 07:01 |
| micahg | StevenK: just the daily PPA I think | 07:02 |
| wgrant | Um. | 07:02 |
| wgrant | There are 3 i386 builders. | 07:02 |
| wgrant | Dailies are surely the last things that should be scored up. | 07:02 |
| * StevenK waves his hands | 07:02 | |
| StevenK | I'm doing it because I was asked to, and would rather avoid an argument about the best use of buildd CPU time | 07:03 |
| wgrant | Well. | 07:03 |
| wgrant | I don't think dailies are the best use. | 07:03 |
| micahg | these are the most popular dailies | 07:03 |
| wgrant | Given that they happen... daily. | 07:03 |
| wgrant | And take a damn long time to build. | 07:03 |
| * micahg will reduce the request even further to just xulrunner-2.0 and firefox 4.0 i386 for lucid and maverick for the mozilla stuff which'll take all of 2 hrs to build | 07:04 | |
| StevenK | micahg: That's all of the chromium stuff bumped | 07:05 |
| micahg | StevenK: I hope just 2 builds, right? | 07:06 |
| StevenK | micahg: 4 builds | 07:07 |
| StevenK | But I've bumped stuff by mistake that can be fixed | 07:07 |
| StevenK | micahg: And xulrunner-2.0 firefox-4.0 i386 {lucid,maverick} bumped | 07:07 |
| micahg | StevenK: awesome, thank you :) | 07:08 |
| magcius | micahg: why aren't you just using the nightlies provided by Mozilla? | 07:12 |
| micahg | magcius: we use some system libs and our builds come as .debs | 07:12 |
| magcius | micahg: ok. | 07:12 |
| magcius | micahg: are there any changes to the source besides the configuration? | 07:12 |
| magcius | micahg: also, are you using PGO? | 07:13 |
| micahg | magcius: yes, we remove the binary parts | 07:13 |
| micahg | magcius: no, not yet since upstream is not doing it yet | 07:13 |
| magcius | micahg: binary parts? Also, isn't this a violation of the trademark guidelines? | 07:13 |
| micahg | magcius: we should go to #ubuntu-mozillateam to continue this | 07:13 |
| magcius | micahg: ok | 07:13 |
| magcius | micahg: I don't use Ubuntu, though | 07:14 |
| micahg | magcius: k, but this discussion is OT for this channel :) | 07:14 |
| magcius | micahg: I agree. | 07:15 |
| magcius | micahg: does Launchpad have a "Send Upstream" button yet? :P | 07:16 |
| micahg | magcius: no, but it's in progress I think | 07:16 |
| magcius | is http://packages.ubuntu.com/ obsolete now with http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source having the same data and more? Will it be phased out? | 07:19 |
| logari81 | hi, what happened with the i386 ppa builders? | 07:22 |
| logari81 | i386 3 679 jobs (three days) | 07:22 |
| magcius | logari81: the builders are overloaded terribly right now | 07:29 |
| logari81 | magcius: but why only i386? | 07:30 |
| magcius | logari81: because that's the majority of where build jobs go | 07:30 |
| logari81 | ok | 07:30 |
| logari81 | magcius: is there any way to cancel some jobs? I don't want to contribute to this jam | 07:33 |
| magcius | logari81: don't worry about it | 07:33 |
| magcius | logari81: someone here could probably do it though | 07:33 |
| rioch | I have a bunch of new translation files that have been sitting in my import queue with the status "Needs review" for some time now. | 08:40 |
| rioch | How can I get these imported? | 08:40 |
| === stub1 is now known as stub | ||
| === lag is now known as lag-day-off | ||
| tseliot | any launchpadders around? I'm having a problem with a private PPA | 09:41 |
| tseliot | I'm seeing the following error: https://pastebin.canonical.com/35210/ | 09:43 |
| tseliot | after I try to upload to that private PPA. Another user is having the same problem | 09:43 |
| tseliot | allenap: ^^ | 09:51 |
| allenap | tseliot: I don't know about PPPAs but I'll see if I can find someone who does. | 09:57 |
| tseliot | allenap: thanks | 09:57 |
| allenap | Perhaps if I mention soyuz here I'll cause some IRC clients to go ping :) | 09:58 |
| bigjools | hello | 09:59 |
| bigjools | was OTP | 09:59 |
| bigjools | tseliot: it's a bug | 10:00 |
| bigjools | private team? | 10:00 |
| bigjools | we've got private teams using private PPAs elsewhere though, so this is odd | 10:01 |
| tseliot | bigjools: yes, it's a private team | 10:04 |
| bigjools | tseliot: please file a bug on launchpad-registry, their code has a bug | 10:05 |
| bigjools | paste that rejection message | 10:05 |
| tseliot | ok, thanks | 10:06 |
| tseliot | I've filed bug #611617 | 10:12 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 611617 in Launchpad Registry "Uploads to a private team's PPA are rejected (affected: 1, heat: 8)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/611617 | 10:12 |
| bigjools | tseliot: was it a private PPA as well? | 10:12 |
| soren | I have an e-mail in a mailing list's moderation queue which was sent by a subscriber.. How can I tell why it's being held for moderation? | 10:12 |
| tseliot | bigjools: yep | 10:12 |
| bigjools | tseliot: ok thanks | 10:12 |
| soren | It even correctly identifies the sender and sets the Author URL to point to his lp page. | 10:14 |
| soren | so it's not because he's using an e-mail address unknown to LP, which was my only guess. :-/ | 10:14 |
| soren | He also says he doesn't actually receive any e-mails from the list. | 10:15 |
| tseliot | bigjools: if you need further information, just let me know :-) | 10:15 |
| tseliot | and thanks for your help | 10:15 |
| bigjools | tseliot: I need to wait for curtis to comment | 10:15 |
| bigjools | np | 10:15 |
| tseliot | ok | 10:16 |
| wgrant | Sounds like it's because the private team's email addres is the maintainer. | 10:16 |
| soren | There's a private team? | 10:16 |
| wgrant | soren: I refer to tseliot's issue. | 10:17 |
| soren | Oh. | 10:17 |
| soren | Heh :) | 10:17 |
| tseliot | ah, let me check the other packages | 10:17 |
| czajkowski | soren: content in the email ? | 10:20 |
| czajkowski | soren: or subject | 10:20 |
| tseliot | wgrant: I've just looked at another package (that was successfully uploaded) and the maintainer's address is not the team's address | 10:21 |
| soren | czajkowski: Well, he does says "Wow!" in there, but being excited should be allowed :) | 10:21 |
| wgrant | tseliot: What about the package that failed to upload? | 10:21 |
| czajkowski | soren: I'm not gonna argue, just seen it sometimes if a subject is odd or there is unusal content. | 10:21 |
| tseliot | wgrant: it was using the team's address | 10:22 |
| wgrant | tseliot: That would probably be it, then. | 10:22 |
| tseliot | yep, let me try here | 10:22 |
| soren | czajkowski: Yeah.. I don't /think/ that's it. It doesn't look spammy to my eye at all. | 10:22 |
| wgrant | Someone should probably add that to the bug. | 10:22 |
| tseliot | wgrant: I'll try to upload again and add a note in the bug report | 10:24 |
| soren | czajkowski: Uh... And now the one in the queue just got accepted (without my doing anything) and another one he sent shot straight through. /me suspects a man behind the curtain laughing at me right now | 10:24 |
| czajkowski | soren: tis early in the morning, go make yourself a cuppa tea ;) | 10:25 |
| * soren does so | 10:31 | |
| tseliot | wgrant: that did it | 10:34 |
| wgrant | tseliot: Excellent. I've already commented on the bug. | 10:34 |
| === jelmer_ is now known as jelmer | ||
| tseliot | wgrant, bigjools: thanks for your help | 10:36 |
| bigjools | tseliot: coolio, glad it works now | 10:37 |
| bigjools | so it DTRT, just the error message was kinda funky | 10:38 |
| tseliot | yes | 10:38 |
| wgrant | Is it the right thing? | 10:39 |
| wgrant | I guess it does end up in indices... | 10:39 |
| X3 | can anyone look at this https://code.launchpad.net/~x3lectric/xbmc/svn-trunk | 10:46 |
| X3 | it fails most of the times | 10:46 |
| wgrant | X3: It's that same issue as before... | 10:48 |
| wgrant | LOSA ping: pear's bzr-svn config is corrupt again. | 10:48 |
| mthaddon | ugh | 10:48 |
| X3 | wgrant if the issue is that it keeps failing then ya | 10:48 |
| jelmer | mthaddon: I'll be landing a fix for that issue tonight. | 10:48 |
| X3 | morning btw | 10:49 |
| jelmer | hi William, Tom, X3 | 10:49 |
| X3 | hi jelmer | 10:49 |
| wgrant | Morning jelmer. | 10:49 |
| mthaddon | wgrant, jelmer: ok, I think that should be better now | 10:50 |
| X3 | whos buying breakfast? | 10:50 |
| * jelmer hands X3 a cup of coffee | 10:50 | |
| * X3 takes it and has a sip | 10:50 | |
| wgrant | mthaddon: Thanks. | 10:51 |
| mthaddon | np | 10:51 |
| * X3 passes bacon sandwiches around | 10:51 | |
| X3 | also besides that trunk failing to import, i wanted to ask about ntfs-3g is there a actuall ntfs-3g-2010.5.22 all I see is older versions | 10:56 |
| X3 | some bugs I have been fixed in that new version | 10:57 |
| wgrant | X3: 2010.3.6 is the latest version in Ubuntu. | 10:57 |
| X3 | current in linux even backport dont work | 10:57 |
| X3 | ya that version is still bummed | 10:58 |
| wgrant | X3: The import is going again. | 10:58 |
| wgrant | On one of the slow machines, sadly. | 10:58 |
| X3 | thx | 10:58 |
| X3 | lol | 10:58 |
| X3 | they all slow | 10:58 |
| wgrant | But some are slower than others. | 10:59 |
| X3 | 20 hours to compile sabnzbdplus backport | 10:59 |
| wgrant | Oh, they're different machines. | 10:59 |
| X3 | its a bit congested it seems | 10:59 |
| wgrant | The build farm is a little busy at the moment. | 10:59 |
| wgrant | Yes. | 10:59 |
| X3 | is there an easy way to import the new ntfs-3g and have it buid | 11:00 |
| X3 | im quite new at packaging and all my attempts fail | 11:01 |
| X3 | how do I request a code import if the ntfs-3g project doesnt exist | 11:30 |
| X3 | im at the request page and only 3 related projects are up | 11:30 |
| X3 | do I have to register the project myself or how can I link it otherwise | 11:35 |
| vish | hi , I'm not able to assign a bug to the docs team [I'm part of the papercuts team,the bug supervisor for papercuts project] , is that also not possible now? | 12:01 |
| vish | Error ID: OOPS-1672N688 | 12:02 |
| ubot5 | https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1672N688 | 12:02 |
| vish | and Error ID: OOPS-1672N673 | 12:02 |
| ubot5 | https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1672N673 | 12:02 |
| vish | tried several times and it keeps giving Timeout Error.. | 12:03 |
| vish | bah , same problem with edge too :( Error ID: OOPS-1672EB2311 | 12:19 |
| ubot5 | https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1672EB2311 | 12:19 |
| pmatulis | can someone confirm that launchpadlib does not have proxy support? | 12:56 |
| pmatulis | add-apt-repository uses it (i think) and fails in proxy environment | 12:57 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| jpds | pmatulis: It doesn't (but I think it's more a Python issue). | 12:59 |
| pmatulis | jpds: alright, thx | 12:59 |
| === mrevell is now known as mrevell-lunch | ||
| vish | hmm ,i kept trying and lp kept giving me timeout errors! but seems to have worked! | 13:03 |
| vish | now I have a double comment :/ | 13:03 |
| === matsubara-afk is now known as matsubara | ||
| === mrevell-lunch is now known as mrevell | ||
| diwic | Three days until my package builds? *moaning* | 14:31 |
| X3 | i been waiting for way more then 3 | 14:33 |
| bigjools | where are you getting three days from? | 14:44 |
| shadeslayer | we owns the buildd with KDE ... muwhahaha :P | 14:45 |
| shadeslayer | jk | 14:46 |
| diwic | bigjools, https://launchpad.net/~diwic/+archive/ppa/+build/1897162 | 14:46 |
| bigjools | hmmm | 14:46 |
| bigjools | ok thanks | 14:46 |
| bigjools | we might get some builders back today I hope | 14:46 |
| diwic | bigjools, are they busy building other things? | 14:47 |
| diwic | bigjools, doing archive rebuilds as a result of the new toolchain? | 14:47 |
| shadeslayer | bigjools: same goes for https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~team-iquik/+recipe/lmsensors-trunk | 14:48 |
| bigjools | no, the rebuilds were scored to the bottom | 14:48 |
| shadeslayer | btw can you delete the first 2 builds from that | 14:49 |
| shadeslayer | since we want the package to go in experimenting | 14:49 |
| bigjools | we've got a backlog because the available build machines has been reduced for 2 days | 14:49 |
| bigjools | you can delete your own builds if theyre not necessary | 14:49 |
| diwic | okay | 14:49 |
| shadeslayer | bigjools: ok | 14:49 |
| bigjools | just delete the source and the build will be ignored | 14:49 |
| shadeslayer | err | 14:50 |
| shadeslayer | bigjools: its a daily build ^_^ | 14:50 |
| bigjools | recipe? | 14:51 |
| shadeslayer | bigjools: delete the recipie? :o | 14:51 |
| bigjools | I was asking if it's a recipe build | 14:52 |
| shadeslayer | yes | 14:52 |
| bigjools | ok | 14:52 |
| bigjools | abentley: is it possible to have more than one outstanding recipe build for the same package/person/ppa ? | 14:52 |
| abentley | bigjools, yes, if the distroseries are different. | 14:53 |
| bigjools | abentley: what if they're not? | 14:54 |
| abentley | bigjools, then you should get an error when you request it. | 14:54 |
| bigjools | ok | 14:54 |
| === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch | ||
| bigjools | shadeslayer: you can directly cancel the build request for a recipe | 14:55 |
| abentley | bigjools, I believe only admins can do that. | 14:56 |
| bigjools | abentley: oh really? why the restriction? | 14:57 |
| abentley | bigjools, because it's not a proper cancel. | 14:57 |
| shadeslayer | brr everything is frozen | 14:57 |
| bigjools | oh, the slash and burn approach cancel | 14:58 |
| abentley | bigjools, it's just that horrible DB query, except as python. | 14:58 |
| shadeslayer | oh finally | 14:58 |
| bigjools | abentley: right | 14:58 |
| czajkowski | sinzui: any luck regarding yesterdays request? | 15:04 |
| sinzui | czajkowski, none yet. I am going to send spam to all launchpad engineers to see if anyone knows if the information exists and how to read it | 15:04 |
| czajkowski | thanks | 15:05 |
| czajkowski | much appreciated | 15:05 |
| shadeslayer | jelmer: any news on the kdelibs import? :) | 15:39 |
| jelmer | shadeslayer: Not yet, still work in progress. I might have some more time for it tonight or some evening next week. | 15:49 |
| Cepheus | Hmm, milestones on my project are a bit bugged. Tried to delete the bugged milestone, got OOPS-1672C952 | 16:20 |
| ubot5 | https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1672C952 | 16:20 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| shadeslayer | jelmer: ok .. just wanted to know the status | 16:52 |
| jelmer | shadeslayer: I'll make sure to keep the relevant bug up to date - do you have the bug #? | 16:52 |
| shadeslayer | er.. i forgot :P | 16:52 |
| shadeslayer | ill look it up | 16:52 |
| shadeslayer | jelmer: bug 579491 | 16:57 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 579491 in Bazaar Subversion Plugin "iter_changes on caching logwalker supports only one prefix (affected: 3, heat: 15)" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/579491 | 16:57 |
| shadeslayer | ive subscribed my self now | 16:57 |
| === salgado is now known as salgado-lunch | ||
| === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara | ||
| === deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] | ||
| cody-somerville | Could I losa please rename the live-helper project to live-build? | 17:50 |
| === salgado-lunch is now known as salgado | ||
| mthaddon | cody-somerville: is that a blocked name? if not you should be able to rename yourself | 17:50 |
| cody-somerville | mthaddon, how? there isn't a field in change details | 17:52 |
| mthaddon | are you not the maintainer? | 17:52 |
| cody-somerville | mthaddon, I am, yes. | 17:52 |
| === deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck | ||
| mthaddon | hmm, I thought maintainers could - in any case, renaming for you | 17:53 |
| mthaddon | cody-somerville: done | 17:53 |
| cody-somerville | mthaddon, thanks. Can you set up an alias too? | 17:54 |
| cody-somerville | mthaddon, live-helper -> live-build | 17:54 |
| mthaddon | ok, done | 17:54 |
| cody-somerville | Thank you! :) | 17:54 |
| mthaddon | np | 17:58 |
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-lunch | ||
| === beuno is now known as beuno-lunch | ||
| bsaibes_ | How can I find what is my ID URL | 18:50 |
| bsaibes_ | I think I got it, it should be https://launchpad.net/~my-nickname, now I have to remember whether I have provided a nick name or where to add it | 18:54 |
| === beuno-lunch is now known as beuno | ||
| === matsubara is now known as matsubara-brb | ||
| === matsubara-brb is now known as matsubara | ||
| === Ursinha-lunch is now known as Ursinha | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === Philip6 is now known as Philip5 | ||
| === bpeel_away is now known as bpeel | ||
| plars | any possible way to re-enable a ppa that has been disabled? | 22:34 |
| james_w | plars: yes, ask a losa I think | 22:34 |
| plars | james_w: ok, thanks | 22:35 |
| wgrant | plars: If a PPA has been disabled, you can reenable it yourself. | 22:37 |
| wgrant | If it's been deleted, it's not really recoverable at the moment. | 22:37 |
| plars | wgrant: yeah, in my case I think I deleted it, but if I try to upload to it, I think it said it was disabled... it's deleted, but still there it seems (confusing) | 22:38 |
| wgrant | plars: At the moment, deleting it just removes the archive from disk. It doesn't yet remove it from the database, although it probably will soon. | 22:38 |
| === matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!