[07:45] good morning [08:00] Hi! I am beginning to give some love back and picked up a quite simple bug to get it fixed: (LP: #610622). I pushed a fix-proposal to lp and posted a review request/merge proposal. According to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DistributedDevelopment/Documentation/SeekingSponsorship , that should be pretty much it to get the sponsorship process going. [08:01] I set the status of the bug to "In progress" and assigned it to my self, just like https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status said. However, I started to think if it was the right thing to do. [08:02] Code-review docs talk about setting the status to "In progress" if the patch needs still work and is done by a reviewer. [08:03] So the long story in short: what should be the status of the bug during a review/merge process? And should it be assigned to someone only by reviewers? === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach [11:16] tuos: sponsoring has its own process and happens automatically [11:16] tuos: the reviewers generally don't go through the sponsors list. Someone will get to it soon :) [11:16] (except for the reviewers who are also sponsors) === daker_ is now known as daker === yofel_ is now known as yofel === daker_ is now known as daker [15:54] Hey jono - haven't seen you about for a few years (I'm the daft one from LRL a few years back and Linux Expo UK with long Blonde hair...). Hows the land of the free treating you. [15:58] hey MWelchUK_work! [15:58] long time [15:58] about to hop on a call, but all good? [15:58] Certainly is [15:58] Yup - I'll pester you some other time :-) [16:09] MWelchUK_work: sorry about the other day. I fell asleep. [16:09] If something is in the sponsorship queue, it will be checked out soon enough. I'm not sure what's the current wait time time. [16:09] Generally, I poke somone I know for sponsorship. [16:10] nigelb, np [16:10] but that's not needed at all. I do it only for feedback for future :) [16:11] I'm afraid I'm a bit naive to the processes arround Ubuntu development - for the most part it "just works" for me as a dev host. [16:11] I just gagging to move up to 10.04 (my current dev machine is 8.04) [16:12] ah :)) [16:12] Work machine - I go from LTS to LTS. Not sure my manager would be too happy with me taking time to re-install my machine every 6 months... [16:13] yeah that's what we plan to do too. Just moved to 10.04 from windows 2000 [16:14] Now that's an upgrade :-) [16:14] Yep. They were planning on buying new systems. [16:15] Now, just some ram and it works great. [16:19] Hi there! I'm looking for someone to review a quick and easy patch of mine, can somebody help me, please? [16:19] candrea: sure, bug 3? [16:20] Launchpad bug 3 in mono (Ubuntu) (and 2 other projects) "Custom information for each translation team (affects: 1) (heat: 2)" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/3 [16:20] bug # rather [16:20] fail.... bug number? [16:20] bug 399711 [16:20] Launchpad bug 399711 in software-properties (Ubuntu) "add-apt-repository ppa:username does not add deb-src entry (affects: 5) (heat: 36)" [Low,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/399711 [16:20] here's the MP: https://code.launchpad.net/~andrea.corbellini/software-properties/bug-399711/+merge/22593 [16:24] candrea: I just poked mvo. He's looking into it :) [16:26] candrea: < mvo> nigelb: looks fine [16:26] nigelb: I poked him too some months ago, but he never replied, probably he was just busy... anyhow thanks! [16:27] candrea: np :) [16:27] nigelb: cool. I'm not a core dev so I suppose he will merge it for me, right? [16:28] you've asked for it to be branched to the software cener trunk [16:28] he has to do it [16:28] ok