| dfarning_ | rgs_, ping | 00:22 |
|---|---|---|
| rgs_ | dfarning_: pong | 00:40 |
| dfarning_ | rgs_, how are you | 00:40 |
| === satellit__ is now known as satellit__afk | ||
| === satellit__afk is now known as satellit__ | ||
| * lfaraone waves | 14:15 | |
| kandarpk | dfarning, lfaraone: Good morning. | 14:44 |
| lfaraone | hello kandarpk | 14:44 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: I've updated poll, please see if it is Ok when you review it next. | 15:02 |
| manusheel | dipankar: Hi Dipankar. | 15:10 |
| manusheel | Around? | 15:10 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Hi Kandarp. | 15:10 |
| dipankar | manusheel, Hello Sir | 15:11 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Around? | 15:11 |
| lfaraone | kandarpk: will do. | 15:11 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: hello sir | 15:11 |
| manusheel | kandarpk, dipankar: hello | 15:11 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: thanks. | 15:11 |
| lfaraone | kandarpk: in poll, you don't have any mention of the copyright of debian/* | 15:12 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: in git commit ? | 15:13 |
| lfaraone | kandarpk: and, based on reviewing the package contents, there is no claim by OLPC of copyright, I think it's safe to say that everything is © Collabora / WWWF / Morgan Collett | 15:13 |
| lfaraone | grantbow: in debian/copyright. | 15:13 |
| lfaraone | grantbow: oops, soryr. | 15:13 |
| lfaraone | kandarpk: in debian/copyright. see how other packages have a "Files: debian/*" etc section? | 15:14 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: Oh, was thinking something else. | 15:14 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: yeah ogt your point | 15:14 |
| kandarpk | *got | 15:14 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: debian/* section is there in copyright | 15:16 |
| kandarpk | http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/sugar-poll-activity.git;a=blob;f=debian/copyright;h=79a1d9c0c9c9decba86c4c64af47c6e4eabd1bab;hb=HEAD | 15:16 |
| lfaraone | kandarpk: huhhh. I wonder what file I was looking at, then. my apologies! | 15:18 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: np. | 15:18 |
| lfaraone | kandarpk: although I think the comments about OLPC I made above are still valid :) | 15:18 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: I rather appreciate that you reviewed it instantly when I requested | 15:19 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: yeah, correcting them | 15:19 |
| lfaraone | kandarpk: well, I had just finished jigsaw and was looking for another victim. :D | 15:20 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: :) | 15:20 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: done. | 15:22 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Can you put an r? in front of Speak? | 15:23 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, hey. how are you doing? | 15:23 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: good, you? | 15:23 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: not sure if it is ready. | 15:23 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, I am good too | 15:24 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: great. | 15:24 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Ok. What steps are left in packaging Speak? | 15:24 |
| kandarpk | manusheel: I completed all the steps. | 15:24 |
| kandarpk | manusheel: just didn't refine it. | 15:25 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Ok. | 15:25 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Could you please explain on what would need refinement here? | 15:25 |
| kandarpk | manusheel: didn't run lintian. | 15:25 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Ok. | 15:26 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: Oh, I had done that. | 15:26 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: I'll go through the package for 10 min and add a r? after that | 15:27 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Sure. That would be great. | 15:28 |
| manusheel | Are you working with Luke on something now? | 15:28 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, did you get a chance to look into log-activity? | 15:28 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: currently. | 15:28 |
| kandarpk | manusheel: no sir, was trying to make the documentation | 15:28 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Sure. | 15:29 |
| kandarpk | but am finding it very tough | 15:29 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Documentation, really ? :-) | 15:29 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: yes sir | 15:29 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: there are so many things which causes errors/warnings | 15:30 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Ok. | 15:30 |
| kandarpk | lintian is the biggest culprit | 15:30 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: can you convert the format of log's copyright to the newfangled DEP5 copyright file used elsewhere? | 15:40 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, you mean the thing I asked you before? | 15:40 |
| dipankar | about copyright being old format | 15:41 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: right. what'd I say then? | 15:41 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, you told "Thats nothing serious to be concern right now. It will work for now" | 15:42 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, I guess it won't work from 'now' | 15:42 |
| dipankar | :P | 15:42 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: ugh, sorry about that, I hate it when I'm inconsistant. | 15:44 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, hey. Nothing to apologize for. :) | 15:44 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: and I realize it can be frustrating to have the goalposts changed in the middle :) | 15:44 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, I just need to look for the format again | 15:45 |
| dipankar | :P | 15:45 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, can I refer to flipsticks' format : http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/sugar-flipsticks-activity.git;a=blob;f=debian/copyright;h=39990edfb49f51a9c88a05219b1b1fb78959305a;hb=HEAD | 15:49 |
| dipankar | I think it is according to DEP5 | 15:49 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: it looks right. http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ is the authorative reference, though :) | 15:49 |
| * dipankar is back in a couple of minutes | 15:49 | |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: getting 'sugar-speak-activity: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/sugar/activities/Speak.activity/bot/PyAIML-0.8.5/setup.py' | 15:53 |
| kandarpk | very much like Ankur got for IRC | 15:53 |
| lfaraone | kandarpk: right, we discussed that on the mailing list. | 15:53 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: is adding rule mentioned here sufficient | 15:53 |
| kandarpk | http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-olpc-devel/2010-July/002741.html | 15:53 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: yeah, it was being discussed that it needs to be reported upstream, is that required ? | 15:54 |
| lfaraone | kandarpk: yes, but our immediate fix is to add something to debian/rules' install rule to remove the exec bits on the files at build. | 15:55 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: Ok then, I am just adding the rule for now. | 15:55 |
| lfaraone | kandarpk: yeah, just make a note to go back and submit the patch later. | 15:55 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: Ok. thanks. | 15:56 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: Ok, please review speak when you find it convenient | 16:08 |
| lfaraone | rofl: http://www.df7cb.de/debian/free_beer/ | 16:08 |
| lfaraone | kandarpk: mark it r? . | 16:10 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: oh yes. | 16:11 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: sure. | 16:11 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: done. | 16:19 |
| lfaraone | alsroot: did you author the icons in sugar-write-activity? | 16:21 |
| alsroot | lfaraone: nope, I just reordered existed icons for new toolbars design | 16:22 |
| * dipankar is off to dinner | 16:41 | |
| * dipankar is away: Be Right Back | 16:41 | |
| lfaraone | kandarpk: congrats, sugar-connect-activity was sponsored. | 16:41 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: thanks to you. | 16:41 |
| kandarpk | all praise | 16:41 |
| lfaraone | neeraj: please file sync requests for sugar-{artwork, base, tookit, presence-service}-0.88 and sugar-pippy-activity when you have a chance. | 16:44 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: will the sync request require uploading debian.tar.gz | 16:48 |
| kandarpk | ? | 16:48 |
| kandarpk | the packages you mentioned aren't in debian yet | 16:48 |
| lfaraone | kandarpk: no, a sync is juuust a bug report. | 16:48 |
| lfaraone | kandarpk: they are, last I checked, no? | 16:49 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: but I uploaded debian tarball for poll and connect | 16:49 |
| kandarpk | as patch | 16:49 |
| lfaraone | kandarpk: right. that's because poll and connect were not in debian. | 16:50 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: Ok, sugar-pippy is in debian ? | 16:51 |
| lfaraone | kandarpk: yes. | 16:51 |
| kandarpk | I was supposed to package it | 16:51 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Congrats on the sponsorship of sugar connect activity. Neat work. Keep it up. | 16:51 |
| manusheel | lfaraone: Thank you. | 16:52 |
| manusheel | Appreciate your great support and guidance given to the dev team. | 16:52 |
| lfaraone | manusheel: happy to help. | 16:52 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: thanks sir, Luke has played a big role in it. | 16:53 |
| manusheel | dipankar_: Hi Dipankar. | 16:53 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Great. | 16:54 |
| manusheel | So, connect activity is the second activity that has been sponsored. | 16:54 |
| manusheel | That is neat. | 16:54 |
| manusheel | lfaraone: Is Turtle Art available in Debian? | 16:54 |
| lfaraone | manusheel: not as current. | 16:55 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: poll and speak are in queue | 16:57 |
| lfaraone | kandarpk: poll looks good. | 16:57 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: I wish you like speak as well. | 16:58 |
| lfaraone | neeraj: record has this lintian warning: "W: sugar-record-activity source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends sugar-record-activity". Per discussion on-list, this warning can probably be ignored, but to do so we should override it. | 16:59 |
| lfaraone | neeraj: see http://lintian.debian.org/manual/ch2.html#s2.4 | 16:59 |
| lfaraone | kandarpk: well, we'll find that out later this afternoon. I'm off for today, I'll see you all in the PM (EST) | 17:01 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: Sure. | 17:01 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: thanks for your help. | 17:01 |
| lfaraone | kandarpk: my pleasure. | 17:02 |
| neeraj | lfaraone, Ok | 17:02 |
| neeraj | lfaraone, I cloned my record repo using gbp-clone and ran git-buildpackage --git-ignore-new | 17:15 |
| neeraj | lfaraone, its failing to build with.. Error- http://paste.ubuntu.com/471151/ | 17:16 |
| neeraj | as line 17 say's there is problem in parsing Depends: filed content but the control file's Depends field seems fine to me.. | 17:17 |
| kandarpk | neeraj_gupta: can you please paste the depends line from control.in | 17:36 |
| neeraj_gupta | http://paste.ubuntu.com/471158/ | 17:39 |
| === neeraj_gupta is now known as neeraj | ||
| neeraj | kandarpk sir ^^.. Luckily I have last running record activity source code, But I think on git we have to remove the cause of bug and commit changes | 17:40 |
| kandarpk | neeraj: dont know much | 17:41 |
| kandarpk | have you tried regenerating control ? | 17:42 |
| neeraj | kandarpk, yes.. | 17:42 |
| kandarpk | ok | 17:42 |
| dfarning | neeraj, hello. | 17:46 |
| neeraj | dfarning, He :) | 17:46 |
| neeraj | *Hi | 17:47 |
| dfarning | neeraj, how are you? | 17:48 |
| neeraj | dfarning, I am good.. and u? | 17:50 |
| dfarning | neeraj, Good. Did luke talk to you about requesting syncs into ubuntu? | 17:51 |
| neeraj | dfarning, he asked me to file sync request for sugar-{artwork, base, tookit, presence-service}-0.88 and sugar-pippy-activity | 17:52 |
| neeraj | I had a word with kandarp sir how he filed sync request. Also I read https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SyncRequestProcess | 17:53 |
| kandarpk | neeraj: debian.tar patch won't be required here | 17:54 |
| kandarpk | these packages are there in debian | 17:55 |
| neeraj | kandarpk sir, Yeah.. you told me that :) | 17:55 |
| kandarpk | neeraj: Ok. | 17:55 |
| neeraj | kandarpk sir, as for memorize u filed a bug on LP asking them to upgrade it, I have to do it the same for these packages using request sync tool? | 18:02 |
| neeraj | s/it/ | 18:02 |
| kandarpk | neeraj: haven't used request sync tool, but I think thats the way | 18:03 |
| kandarpk | neeraj: today only someone had requested for syncing memorize | 18:03 |
| neeraj | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sugar-memorize-activity/+bug/611260 | 18:04 |
| kandarpk | please look for it in the mailing list | 18:04 |
| kandarpk | neeraj: yes | 18:04 |
| dfarning | neeraj, great. From now on can you key an eye on the version diff page and make sure that they are always in sync? | 18:14 |
| neeraj | dfarning, sure.. Once I get comfortable with sync request, I think I can maintain this task :) | 18:15 |
| === satellit__ is now known as satellit__afk | ||
| dfarning | neeraj, thanks. have you read the wiki pages about the issues. | 18:17 |
| === satellit_ is now known as satellit_afk | ||
| neeraj | dfarning, for sync yes.. | 18:18 |
| neeraj | I read about creating patches and submitting them on LP when I fixed some bugs with lfaraone's help | 18:19 |
| lfaraone | neeraj: are you still having the control problem? | 18:25 |
| neeraj | lfaraone, yes.. | 18:25 |
| neeraj | lfaraone, I removed $(cdbs:Depends) filed and the package is building successfully now.. | 18:27 |
| lfaraone | neeraj: it's supposed to be ${cdbs:Depends} | 18:27 |
| neeraj | lfaraone, yes | 18:28 |
| lfaraone | neeraj: and that line should be there. | 18:28 |
| neeraj | it was the {} see this http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/sugar-record-activity.git;a=blob;f=debian/control.in;h=46c1378c2c26e9c2e8e809b59c49fe801a728d05;hb=0f14896cf08e583397a65b1647816623357a6ba3 | 18:28 |
| lfaraone | neeraj: okay. don't remove that! | 18:32 |
| neeraj | lfaraone, ok | 18:32 |
| dfarning | neeraj, great.... this step needs to become second nature.... To to point where every morning while checking you email you process the syncs. | 18:39 |
| neeraj | dfarning, ok :) | 18:47 |
| neeraj | lfaraone, there is some problem in Depends field only.. | 18:53 |
| lfaraone | neeraj: okay, what are you getting as an error? | 18:53 |
| neeraj | lfaraone, wait.. | 18:54 |
| neeraj | http://paste.ubuntu.com/471179/ | 18:55 |
| neeraj | Now I am changing the control.in file and after regenerating control file I will again run git-buildpackage --git-ignore-new | 18:57 |
| kandarpk | neeraj: your depends field reads : | 18:59 |
| kandarpk | Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${python:Depends}, ${cdbs:Depends}, {misc:Depends} | 18:59 |
| neeraj | Now after removing last dependency:- ${misc:Depends}, the package is building without ny error -> Control file http://paste.ubuntu.com/471181/ | 18:59 |
| kandarpk | shouldn't it be ${misc:Depends} | 18:59 |
| neeraj | kandarpk, Ohh :( | 18:59 |
| neeraj | lfaraone, kandarpk I don't know how I didn't noticed that :( | 19:00 |
| neeraj | sorry for that.. correcting the control.in file.. | 19:01 |
| kandarpk | neeraj: np | 19:02 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, /i have made the new copyright: http://paste.ubuntu.com/471182/ | 19:03 |
| dipankar | if you can just crosscheck it once. | 19:03 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: line six, typo "ttp" | 19:07 |
| === satellit__afk is now known as satellit__ | ||
| neeraj | lfaraone, lintian on my system is not giving this warning "W: sugar-record-activity source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends sugar-record-activity" , http://paste.ubuntu.com/471185/ | 19:08 |
| dipankar | ok | 19:08 |
| neeraj | ny reason for this? | 19:08 |
| lfaraone | neeraj: which file are you running lintian on? | 19:08 |
| neeraj | lfaraone, while building package, lintian automatically runs in between.. | 19:09 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, there are actually different license in the package. how to handle them | 19:10 |
| dipankar | ? | 19:10 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: look at how the other packages handle them. | 19:11 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, here is the updated one: http://paste.ubuntu.com/471188/ | 19:11 |
| dipankar | the problem files are : logcollect.py and logviewer.py | 19:12 |
| neeraj | lfaraone, I ran lintian -iIv on *.changes file.. still no "W: sugar-record-activity source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends sugar-record-activity" | 19:13 |
| neeraj | http://paste.ubuntu.com/471190/ | 19:14 |
| dfarning | manusheel, lfaraone ping | 19:15 |
| lfaraone | hm, odd. | 19:15 |
| lfaraone | dfarning: actually, I'm on my way out to give the dog a walk, it's been a while. can I get back to you in 15? | 19:15 |
| manusheel | lfaraone: Sure. | 19:16 |
| dfarning | lfaraone, sure. I am having network issues..... I also need to read the links you sent. | 19:16 |
| lfaraone | fair enough. | 19:16 |
| dfarning | manusheel, I ping you when I get done reading. | 19:16 |
| manusheel | dfarning: Sure. | 19:16 |
| dipankar | manusheel, dfarning : I need help with the first license | 19:19 |
| dipankar | http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/sugar-log-activity.git;a=blob;f=debian/copyright;h=b5ec0e031d0ae259c63e1f61c901e605afed5b19;hb=HEAD | 19:19 |
| dipankar | how to include two license in a copyright file? | 19:20 |
| dipankar | I am unable to find such example in chat -speak -connect -activities | 19:20 |
| manusheel | dipankar: Kindly ask this question at debian olpc mailing list. | 19:23 |
| manusheel | Copy Luke. | 19:23 |
| manusheel | neeraj, kandarpk: Do you know the answer to this question? | 19:24 |
| neeraj | http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ | 19:24 |
| neeraj | dipankar ^^ | 19:24 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir, dipankar : I am not able to understand what problem dipankar is facing | 19:25 |
| neeraj | dipankar see Standalone License Section | 19:25 |
| dipankar | kandarpk, neeraj, the problem is : I am unable to find the proper name of the license used here (the first one) : http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/sugar-log-activity.git;a=blob;f=debian/copyright;h=b5ec0e031d0ae259c63e1f61c901e605afed5b19;hb=HEAD | 19:27 |
| neeraj | dipankar, did u tried copyright_hints? | 19:29 |
| kandarpk | neeraj: that might not help much | 19:29 |
| kandarpk | dipankar: no idea. | 19:30 |
| dipankar | there is no copyright_hints file too | 19:32 |
| dipankar | :( | 19:32 |
| neeraj | kandarpk, dipankar goggling the text help :) | 19:32 |
| neeraj | its under MIT License http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License | 19:32 |
| neeraj | see License Terms | 19:32 |
| dipankar | neeraj, great | 19:33 |
| dipankar | :) | 19:33 |
| dipankar | I never thought two paragraphs can be searched online now | 19:33 |
| dipankar | :P | 19:33 |
| neeraj | :) | 19:34 |
| dipankar | aah | 19:35 |
| dipankar | this is X11 | 19:35 |
| dipankar | license :) | 19:35 |
| neeraj | yes.. other-X11 | 19:37 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, I have made changes in the copyright | 19:55 |
| * dipankar says a good night and great day to all | 19:56 | |
| * lfaraone is back. | 20:00 | |
| manusheel | lfaraone: great. | 20:02 |
| lfaraone | manusheel: do you ever sleep? :) | 20:02 |
| manusheel | lfaraone: Lately, I have been sleeping very little :-) | 20:03 |
| manusheel | lfaraone: CTCP time ? | 20:04 |
| dfarning | lfaraone, can you send me the list of patch types you sent on gchat a few minutes ago? | 20:05 |
| lfaraone | manusheel: it queries you for your local time. | 20:07 |
| lfaraone | dfarning: let me see. | 20:07 |
| manusheel | lfaraone: 12:37 am | 20:07 |
| lfaraone | A. only useful in ubuntu | 20:08 |
| lfaraone | B. useful for debian | 20:08 |
| lfaraone | C. useful for upstream (and debian) | 20:08 |
| lfaraone | D. cherrypicked from upstream or debian | 20:08 |
| lfaraone | ideally, all of our ubuntu-local patches fit into A or D, ie they're either not useful outside of Ubuntu or they've already been included in Debian and/or upstream trunk. (.. and are just being backported) | 20:09 |
| lfaraone | if we follow the upstream first policy for anything that could possibly have a value outside of Ubuntu, we will have very few problems. | 20:09 |
| lfaraone | if you push the changes as far as debian, patch management is easier. | 20:09 |
| dfarning | lfaraone, thanks | 20:09 |
| manusheel | lfaraone: Is "git repo already exists" the reason behind not packaging Chat? | 20:11 |
| manusheel | I think we should be packaging Chat. | 20:11 |
| manusheel | Git repo exists is a use-case, right? | 20:11 |
| lfaraone | manusheel: I didn't write that, but it probably means that Chat is already packaged. | 20:12 |
| lfaraone | manusheel: -> http://packages.debian.org/sid/sugar-chat-activity-0.86 | 20:12 |
| manusheel | lfaraone: Ok. For 0.88? | 20:13 |
| manusheel | Is it packaged? | 20:14 |
| lfaraone | manusheel: yes, in http://packages.debian.org/sid/sugar-chat-activity-0.86. | 20:14 |
| lfaraone | dfarning: so, two new packages were sponsored by LI Daobing today into the archive, and are currently in NEW. | 20:31 |
| dfarning | lfaraone, I saw that. Thanks. Are the more activities in your queue that are ready to be pushed? | 20:34 |
| lfaraone | dfarning: poll. | 20:35 |
| lfaraone | dfarning: should we clear out comments for activities / their ITP bug number when they're uploaded? | 20:36 |
| lfaraone | dfarning: (having r+s on uploaded activities makes it hard to grep through the table. | 20:36 |
| dfarning | lfaraone, I think so. Once we are done with the initial package I think we will be done with the table. | 20:38 |
| dfarning | lfaraone, on second though maybe we should keep the table to help the new team members work through the process as they work though new packages. | 20:39 |
| manusheel | lfaraone: Thanks. | 20:39 |
| lfaraone | dfarning: maybe create a [[Sugar/tasks/archive]]? | 20:40 |
| dfarning | lfaraone, +1 | 20:40 |
| manusheel | lfaraone, +1 | 20:41 |
| manusheel | lfaraone: We would like to package Turtle Art and sugar pippy too. | 20:44 |
| lfaraone | manusheel: Pippy is already packaged. | 20:44 |
| manusheel | What is stopping pippy? I think it has been packaged. | 20:44 |
| lfaraone | manusheel: nothing is stopping Pippy, because it's already in Debian and Ubuntu. | 20:45 |
| manusheel | lfaraone: Yes, this is what I wrote above. However, we do need to update it. | 20:45 |
| manusheel | Right? | 20:45 |
| lfaraone | manusheel: not if I recall correctly. | 20:45 |
| manusheel | lfaraone: Ok. I'll check this part. How about Turtle Art and Paint? | 20:46 |
| lfaraone | manusheel: you'd have to ask ankur about Paint. | 20:47 |
| manusheel | Do you have Matt's e-mail id? | 20:47 |
| === neeraj_gupta is now known as neeraj | ||
| lfaraone | manusheel: mattva01 SWIRL gmail POKE com | 20:47 |
| manusheel | lfaraone: Thanks. | 20:49 |
| manusheel | Will write to Matt. | 20:49 |
| manusheel | lfaraone: Turtle art too has not been pacakaged, right? | 20:49 |
| manusheel | packaged* | 20:49 |
| lfaraone | manusheel: he's doing that, yes. | 20:49 |
| dfarning | manusheel, will you write to matt on the sugar team mailing list? He is subscribed. | 20:51 |
| manusheel | dfarning: Yes, will write to him asking on updates. | 20:52 |
| manusheel | lfaraone: Thanks Luke for the info. | 20:52 |
| manusheel | dfarning: What is the status of browse? | 20:53 |
| dfarning | lfaraone, is it possiable to reassign all bugs currently going to olpc-debian to sugar team in launch pad? | 20:54 |
| manusheel | lfaraone: e-toys marked for review by Ankur. | 20:55 |
| manusheel | Wish if you could review it. | 20:55 |
| neeraj | lfaraone, what should I do with s-record-a (as I have told you I am not getting that warning which you told me to override.) | 20:55 |
| lfaraone | manusheel: do you want me to drop what I'm doing and take a look at it right now? | 20:55 |
| manusheel | lfaraone: Meeting Kandarp, Ankur and Neeraj in some hours from now. | 20:55 |
| manusheel | lfaraone:Luke, you can have a look at it after what you are doing now. | 20:56 |
| manusheel | My apologies. | 20:56 |
| lfaraone | manusheel: no worries. he just marked it for review 4 minutes ago, so I'll get to it eventually, unless you want to make it a priority. | 20:56 |
| dfarning | manusheel, something in one of the browse dependancies is causing sugar to crash... Raul and lucian are looking at it. | 20:56 |
| lfaraone | right now I'm looking at speak. | 20:56 |
| lfaraone | dfarning: I'm pretty sure it's py-gi. | 20:56 |
| lfaraone | dfarning: tomeu recommended either having py-gi updated to a newer version or using an older version of py-gi. | 20:57 |
| lfaraone | (pygobject too) | 20:57 |
| dfarning | lfaraone, yes that is it. | 20:57 |
| lfaraone | s/older/ older stable version/ | 20:57 |
| lucian | lfaraone: newer pygobect has pygi included, so that's the logical step forward | 20:57 |
| lucian | note that pygi is not a browse dependency atm | 20:57 |
| lfaraone | lucian: it's a surf dep, though, right? | 20:58 |
| lucian | lfaraone: no | 20:58 |
| lfaraone | lucian: oh? | 20:58 |
| manusheel | dfarning: Ok. Thanks for the update. | 21:02 |
| manusheel | lfaraone: Yes, please try to review e-toys today. Would like Ankur to spend quality time on its documentation as soon as we get r+. | 21:03 |
| dfarning | manusheel, at this point browse is at a point where it is a technical decsion between lfaraone, lucian, rgs_ and tomeu how to proced with pygi package. | 21:05 |
| lfaraone | manusheel: well, pygi / pygobject isn't maintained by anybody I know. | 21:05 |
| lfaraone | * dfarning | 21:05 |
| lfaraone | dfarning: so it'd be a discussion with the maintainer. | 21:05 |
| manusheel | dfarning: Yes, David. Wish to get some idea on its roadmap. | 21:06 |
| lucian | Got disconnected, chatting from my phone | 21:08 |
| dfarning | lfaraone, +1 and that is a discussion for you guys to have with the maintainer. neither manu or I understand the tech well enough to have a opinion on how to procced. | 21:08 |
| dfarning | lucian, ^^ | 21:08 |
| lucian | Lost some backlog | 21:09 |
| lucian | Last thing I saw was my own message about pywebkitgtk | 21:09 |
| manusheel | lfaraone: Ok. Pygobject is very useful. | 21:09 |
| manusheel | And Pygi too. | 21:10 |
| manusheel | Not, sure, why it has not been maintained. | 21:10 |
| manusheel | lucian: send me your e-mail id. | 21:10 |
| manusheel | Will send you the logs | 21:10 |
| dfarning | lucian, http://pastebin.org/434166 | 21:10 |
| lucian | In case you didn't know, pygi was merged into pygobject | 21:10 |
| lfaraone | lucian: so I've heard :) | 21:10 |
| lucian | Lucian dot branescu at gmail dot com | 21:11 |
| manusheel | lucian: I didn't heard that. Thanks for the update. | 21:11 |
| lucian | Pygobject 2.14.5 or so has pygi | 21:11 |
| lucian | But it's still far from being able to replace pygtk for example | 21:12 |
| manusheel | lucian: Ok. | 21:12 |
| lucian | So nothing in sugar uses pygi right know afaik | 21:13 |
| lucian | And surf will have to use it in order to ever be merged back to mainline | 21:14 |
| lucian | Because pywebkitgtk is buggy and unmaintained and libsoup has no usable python binding (but it's required for feature parity with browse-hulahop) | 21:15 |
| lucian | I fear that surf will spearhead porting to pygi | 21:16 |
| lfaraone | manusheel: etoys rejected, small change, but a large issue. | 21:38 |
| neeraj | lfaraone, filling sync request for sugar-pippy-activity, using requestsync | 21:41 |
| neeraj | requestsync --lp -s -d unstable sugar-pippy-activity | 21:41 |
| neeraj | ^^ seems fine or I need to change something? | 21:42 |
| lfaraone | neeraj: sure. | 21:42 |
| lfaraone | dfarning: right now speak embeds pyamil and pyalice. Should I mention that in my review email, and tell them to go package those components, or should I just leave them embedded? | 21:46 |
| dfarning | lfaraone, I think we need to split it up or it will not meet debian standards. Is that correct? | 21:49 |
| lfaraone | dfarning: while it's technically possible to ship it this way, I would not personally sponsor such a package unless it was impossible or infeasable to unbundle. | 21:50 |
| dfarning | lfaraone, then let's try to split it up. | 21:51 |
| neeraj | lfaraone, some has already requested for sync for s-pippy-activity :) https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sugar-pippy-activity/+bug/608766 | 21:53 |
| neeraj | s/some/someone | 21:54 |
| lfaraone | neeraj: mk then :) | 21:54 |
| lfaraone | dfarning: okay. should we task someone with it, or should I do it? | 21:58 |
| dfarning | lfaraone, please ask manusheel to assign someone. | 22:03 |
| lfaraone | manusheel: ^^ | 22:03 |
| dfarning | manusheel, lfaraone to prevent confusion, I am going to merge the https://launchpad.net/usr and https://launchpad.net/sugar they are very reduntant. | 22:11 |
| dfarning | lfaraone, manusheel does ^^ sound sane? | 22:12 |
| lfaraone | dfarning: ideally /sugar is for the upstream sugar projecft. | 22:12 |
| dfarning | lfaraone, it seems rather confusing? | 22:13 |
| lfaraone | dfarning: agreed. | 22:13 |
| dfarning | lfaraone, how should we fix the problem? | 22:13 |
| lfaraone | dfarning: well, we could disambiguate "this is for upstream sugar. sugar devel is coordinated at URL. if you're looking for sugar on Ubuntu, see URL" | 22:14 |
| dfarning | lfaraone, need to go will be back in a couple hours | 22:16 |
| neeraj | lfaraone, I have requested for sync for sugar-(toolkit,base,artwork,presence-service)-0.88. requestsync is indeed a very useful and easy to use tool :) | 22:21 |
| lfaraone | neeraj: yepp :) | 22:21 |
| * lfaraone is currently planning for DebConf. | 22:21 | |
| dfarning | neeraj, ping | 23:19 |
| neeraj | dfarning: yes | 23:19 |
| dfarning | ready for the next task? | 23:20 |
| neeraj | dfarning: sure :) | 23:21 |
| dfarning | neeraj, next thing I would like you to start on is bugtracking and patch tracking. | 23:23 |
| dfarning | neeraj, do you remember the bug where when you start sugar the mouse buttons no longer work in gnome? | 23:24 |
| neeraj | dfarning: I didn't faced the bug. Ankur and other team member faced it. | 23:25 |
| neeraj | s/the/that | 23:25 |
| dfarning | neeraj, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sugar/+bug/479179 | 23:26 |
| dfarning | neeraj, That bug still exists in 10.10./ | 23:27 |
| neeraj | Though I remember that Dipankar used a patch to fix it | 23:28 |
| neeraj | dfarning: ok. | 23:28 |
| dfarning | neeraj, We are going to have to find out which patch dipandkar used to fix the patch and apply it to 10.10 | 23:28 |
| neeraj | dfarning: sure. Give a min to search logs and previous progress report. | 23:29 |
| neeraj | http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/06/25/%23ubuntu-sugarteam.html#t14:14 | 23:32 |
| neeraj | * now looking for exact patch | 23:32 |
| neeraj | http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/06/25/%23ubuntu-sugarteam.html#t15:10 | 23:33 |
| dfarning | neeraj, A good way to find the patch is to download the source package and look in the debian/patches dir. | 23:35 |
| neeraj | dfarning: ok I think I knw what needs to be done :).. | 23:35 |
| neeraj | http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/jhconvert/repos/mainline/blobs/master/patches/0.86/1544.patch see this | 23:36 |
| dfarning | this is why we keep the patches the special dir. | 23:36 |
| neeraj | dfarning: in sugar-0.XX/bin folder there must be a sugar-session file | 23:37 |
| neeraj | In that I need to change client.set_string field (line 7 and 8) | 23:37 |
| neeraj | line 7 and eight* | 23:38 |
| neeraj | and create a debdiff file. | 23:38 |
| dfarning | neeraj, there should allready be a patch in the sugar package in the ppa.... we can reuse that patch. | 23:42 |
| neeraj | dfarning: Ok. I can also try to see the exact patch from patches directory. | 23:42 |
| dfarning | neeraj, +1 | 23:43 |
| neeraj | dfarning: Ok. Lemme check the sugar ppa then | 23:43 |
| dfarning | neeraj, I am also downloading the package but am on a very slow connection. | 23:43 |
| dfarning | neeraj_gupta, I can not download the source package | 23:47 |
| dfarning | dget -ux https://launchpad.net/~sugarteam/+archive/ppa/+files/sugar-0.88_0.88.1-2ubuntu3.dsc fail for me. | 23:48 |
| neeraj_gupta | dfarning, same here | 23:49 |
| neeraj_gupta | dfarning, lately I fixed dependency issue for a sugar-0.88 package.. | 23:50 |
| neeraj_gupta | I have the source code it.. I checked the bin/sugar-session file | 23:50 |
| neeraj_gupta | http://paste.ubuntu.com/471283/ | 23:50 |
| neeraj_gupta | see line 227 | 23:50 |
| dfarning | neeraj_gupta, ok look inside debian/patches . what files are in that dir? | 23:51 |
| neeraj_gupta | dfarning, there are 3-4 patches | 23:52 |
| neeraj_gupta | Also I am talking about the source which I downloaded from ubuntu-universe not sugarteam ppa | 23:53 |
| dfarning | neeraj_gupta, hmm what patches are in that dir. | 23:54 |
| dfarning | neeraj_gupta, this is exactly the problem..... we need a system to keep from losing patches. | 23:55 |
| === neeraj_gupta is now known as neeraj | ||
| neeraj | dfarning, sure.. But now the problem is due to launchpad about which we can't do anything | 23:57 |
| neeraj | I have mailed the content patches dir | 23:57 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!