[00:22] rgs_, ping [00:40] dfarning_: pong [00:40] rgs_, how are you === satellit__ is now known as satellit__afk === satellit__afk is now known as satellit__ [14:15] * lfaraone waves [14:44] dfarning, lfaraone: Good morning. [14:44] hello kandarpk [15:02] lfaraone: I've updated poll, please see if it is Ok when you review it next. [15:10] dipankar: Hi Dipankar. [15:10] Around? [15:10] kandarpk: Hi Kandarp. [15:11] manusheel, Hello Sir [15:11] kandarpk: Around? [15:11] kandarpk: will do. [15:11] manusheel sir: hello sir [15:11] kandarpk, dipankar: hello [15:11] lfaraone: thanks. [15:12] kandarpk: in poll, you don't have any mention of the copyright of debian/* [15:13] lfaraone: in git commit ? [15:13] kandarpk: and, based on reviewing the package contents, there is no claim by OLPC of copyright, I think it's safe to say that everything is © Collabora / WWWF / Morgan Collett [15:13] grantbow: in debian/copyright. [15:13] grantbow: oops, soryr. [15:14] kandarpk: in debian/copyright. see how other packages have a "Files: debian/*" etc section? [15:14] lfaraone: Oh, was thinking something else. [15:14] lfaraone: yeah ogt your point [15:14] *got [15:16] lfaraone: debian/* section is there in copyright [15:16] http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/sugar-poll-activity.git;a=blob;f=debian/copyright;h=79a1d9c0c9c9decba86c4c64af47c6e4eabd1bab;hb=HEAD [15:18] kandarpk: huhhh. I wonder what file I was looking at, then. my apologies! [15:18] lfaraone: np. [15:18] kandarpk: although I think the comments about OLPC I made above are still valid :) [15:19] lfaraone: I rather appreciate that you reviewed it instantly when I requested [15:19] lfaraone: yeah, correcting them [15:20] kandarpk: well, I had just finished jigsaw and was looking for another victim. :D [15:20] lfaraone: :) [15:22] lfaraone: done. [15:23] kandarpk: Can you put an r? in front of Speak? [15:23] lfaraone, hey. how are you doing? [15:23] dipankar: good, you? [15:23] manusheel sir: not sure if it is ready. [15:24] lfaraone, I am good too [15:24] dipankar: great. [15:24] kandarpk: Ok. What steps are left in packaging Speak? [15:24] manusheel: I completed all the steps. [15:25] manusheel: just didn't refine it. [15:25] kandarpk: Ok. [15:25] kandarpk: Could you please explain on what would need refinement here? [15:25] manusheel: didn't run lintian. [15:26] kandarpk: Ok. [15:26] manusheel sir: Oh, I had done that. [15:27] manusheel sir: I'll go through the package for 10 min and add a r? after that [15:28] kandarpk: Sure. That would be great. [15:28] Are you working with Luke on something now? [15:28] lfaraone, did you get a chance to look into log-activity? [15:28] dipankar: currently. [15:28] manusheel: no sir, was trying to make the documentation [15:29] kandarpk: Sure. [15:29] but am finding it very tough [15:29] kandarpk: Documentation, really ? :-) [15:29] manusheel sir: yes sir [15:30] manusheel sir: there are so many things which causes errors/warnings [15:30] kandarpk: Ok. [15:30] lintian is the biggest culprit [15:40] dipankar: can you convert the format of log's copyright to the newfangled DEP5 copyright file used elsewhere? [15:40] lfaraone, you mean the thing I asked you before? [15:41] about copyright being old format [15:41] dipankar: right. what'd I say then? [15:42] lfaraone, you told "Thats nothing serious to be concern right now. It will work for now" [15:42] lfaraone, I guess it won't work from 'now' [15:42] :P [15:44] dipankar: ugh, sorry about that, I hate it when I'm inconsistant. [15:44] lfaraone, hey. Nothing to apologize for. :) [15:44] dipankar: and I realize it can be frustrating to have the goalposts changed in the middle :) [15:45] lfaraone, I just need to look for the format again [15:45] :P [15:49] lfaraone, can I refer to flipsticks' format : http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/sugar-flipsticks-activity.git;a=blob;f=debian/copyright;h=39990edfb49f51a9c88a05219b1b1fb78959305a;hb=HEAD [15:49] I think it is according to DEP5 [15:49] dipankar: it looks right. http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ is the authorative reference, though :) [15:49] * dipankar is back in a couple of minutes [15:53] lfaraone: getting 'sugar-speak-activity: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/sugar/activities/Speak.activity/bot/PyAIML-0.8.5/setup.py' [15:53] very much like Ankur got for IRC [15:53] kandarpk: right, we discussed that on the mailing list. [15:53] lfaraone: is adding rule mentioned here sufficient [15:53] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-olpc-devel/2010-July/002741.html [15:54] lfaraone: yeah, it was being discussed that it needs to be reported upstream, is that required ? [15:55] kandarpk: yes, but our immediate fix is to add something to debian/rules' install rule to remove the exec bits on the files at build. [15:55] lfaraone: Ok then, I am just adding the rule for now. [15:55] kandarpk: yeah, just make a note to go back and submit the patch later. [15:56] lfaraone: Ok. thanks. [16:08] lfaraone: Ok, please review speak when you find it convenient [16:08] rofl: http://www.df7cb.de/debian/free_beer/ [16:10] kandarpk: mark it r? . [16:11] lfaraone: oh yes. [16:11] lfaraone: sure. [16:19] lfaraone: done. [16:21] alsroot: did you author the icons in sugar-write-activity? [16:22] lfaraone: nope, I just reordered existed icons for new toolbars design [16:41] * dipankar is off to dinner [16:41] * dipankar is away: Be Right Back [16:41] kandarpk: congrats, sugar-connect-activity was sponsored. [16:41] lfaraone: thanks to you. [16:41] all praise [16:44] neeraj: please file sync requests for sugar-{artwork, base, tookit, presence-service}-0.88 and sugar-pippy-activity when you have a chance. [16:48] lfaraone: will the sync request require uploading debian.tar.gz [16:48] ? [16:48] the packages you mentioned aren't in debian yet [16:48] kandarpk: no, a sync is juuust a bug report. [16:49] kandarpk: they are, last I checked, no? [16:49] lfaraone: but I uploaded debian tarball for poll and connect [16:49] as patch [16:50] kandarpk: right. that's because poll and connect were not in debian. [16:51] lfaraone: Ok, sugar-pippy is in debian ? [16:51] kandarpk: yes. [16:51] I was supposed to package it [16:51] kandarpk: Congrats on the sponsorship of sugar connect activity. Neat work. Keep it up. [16:52] lfaraone: Thank you. [16:52] Appreciate your great support and guidance given to the dev team. [16:52] manusheel: happy to help. [16:53] manusheel sir: thanks sir, Luke has played a big role in it. [16:53] dipankar_: Hi Dipankar. [16:54] kandarpk: Great. [16:54] So, connect activity is the second activity that has been sponsored. [16:54] That is neat. [16:54] lfaraone: Is Turtle Art available in Debian? [16:55] manusheel: not as current. [16:57] manusheel sir: poll and speak are in queue [16:57] kandarpk: poll looks good. [16:58] lfaraone: I wish you like speak as well. [16:59] neeraj: record has this lintian warning: "W: sugar-record-activity source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends sugar-record-activity". Per discussion on-list, this warning can probably be ignored, but to do so we should override it. [16:59] neeraj: see http://lintian.debian.org/manual/ch2.html#s2.4 [17:01] kandarpk: well, we'll find that out later this afternoon. I'm off for today, I'll see you all in the PM (EST) [17:01] lfaraone: Sure. [17:01] lfaraone: thanks for your help. [17:02] kandarpk: my pleasure. [17:02] lfaraone, Ok [17:15] lfaraone, I cloned my record repo using gbp-clone and ran git-buildpackage --git-ignore-new [17:16] lfaraone, its failing to build with.. Error- http://paste.ubuntu.com/471151/ [17:17] as line 17 say's there is problem in parsing Depends: filed content but the control file's Depends field seems fine to me.. [17:36] neeraj_gupta: can you please paste the depends line from control.in [17:39] http://paste.ubuntu.com/471158/ === neeraj_gupta is now known as neeraj [17:40] kandarpk sir ^^.. Luckily I have last running record activity source code, But I think on git we have to remove the cause of bug and commit changes [17:41] neeraj: dont know much [17:42] have you tried regenerating control ? [17:42] kandarpk, yes.. [17:42] ok [17:46] neeraj, hello. [17:46] dfarning, He :) [17:47] *Hi [17:48] neeraj, how are you? [17:50] dfarning, I am good.. and u? [17:51] neeraj, Good. Did luke talk to you about requesting syncs into ubuntu? [17:52] dfarning, he asked me to file sync request for sugar-{artwork, base, tookit, presence-service}-0.88 and sugar-pippy-activity [17:53] I had a word with kandarp sir how he filed sync request. Also I read https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SyncRequestProcess [17:54] neeraj: debian.tar patch won't be required here [17:55] these packages are there in debian [17:55] kandarpk sir, Yeah.. you told me that :) [17:55] neeraj: Ok. [18:02] kandarpk sir, as for memorize u filed a bug on LP asking them to upgrade it, I have to do it the same for these packages using request sync tool? [18:02] s/it/ [18:03] neeraj: haven't used request sync tool, but I think thats the way [18:03] neeraj: today only someone had requested for syncing memorize [18:04] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sugar-memorize-activity/+bug/611260 [18:04] please look for it in the mailing list [18:04] neeraj: yes [18:14] neeraj, great. From now on can you key an eye on the version diff page and make sure that they are always in sync? [18:15] dfarning, sure.. Once I get comfortable with sync request, I think I can maintain this task :) === satellit__ is now known as satellit__afk [18:17] neeraj, thanks. have you read the wiki pages about the issues. === satellit_ is now known as satellit_afk [18:18] dfarning, for sync yes.. [18:19] I read about creating patches and submitting them on LP when I fixed some bugs with lfaraone's help [18:25] neeraj: are you still having the control problem? [18:25] lfaraone, yes.. [18:27] lfaraone, I removed $(cdbs:Depends) filed and the package is building successfully now.. [18:27] neeraj: it's supposed to be ${cdbs:Depends} [18:28] lfaraone, yes [18:28] neeraj: and that line should be there. [18:28] it was the {} see this http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/sugar-record-activity.git;a=blob;f=debian/control.in;h=46c1378c2c26e9c2e8e809b59c49fe801a728d05;hb=0f14896cf08e583397a65b1647816623357a6ba3 [18:32] neeraj: okay. don't remove that! [18:32] lfaraone, ok [18:39] neeraj, great.... this step needs to become second nature.... To to point where every morning while checking you email you process the syncs. [18:47] dfarning, ok :) [18:53] lfaraone, there is some problem in Depends field only.. [18:53] neeraj: okay, what are you getting as an error? [18:54] lfaraone, wait.. [18:55] http://paste.ubuntu.com/471179/ [18:57] Now I am changing the control.in file and after regenerating control file I will again run git-buildpackage --git-ignore-new [18:59] neeraj: your depends field reads : [18:59] Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${python:Depends}, ${cdbs:Depends}, {misc:Depends} [18:59] Now after removing last dependency:- ${misc:Depends}, the package is building without ny error -> Control file http://paste.ubuntu.com/471181/ [18:59] shouldn't it be ${misc:Depends} [18:59] kandarpk, Ohh :( [19:00] lfaraone, kandarpk I don't know how I didn't noticed that :( [19:01] sorry for that.. correcting the control.in file.. [19:02] neeraj: np [19:03] lfaraone, /i have made the new copyright: http://paste.ubuntu.com/471182/ [19:03] if you can just crosscheck it once. [19:07] dipankar: line six, typo "ttp" === satellit__afk is now known as satellit__ [19:08] lfaraone, lintian on my system is not giving this warning "W: sugar-record-activity source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends sugar-record-activity" , http://paste.ubuntu.com/471185/ [19:08] ok [19:08] ny reason for this? [19:08] neeraj: which file are you running lintian on? [19:09] lfaraone, while building package, lintian automatically runs in between.. [19:10] lfaraone, there are actually different license in the package. how to handle them [19:10] ? [19:11] dipankar: look at how the other packages handle them. [19:11] lfaraone, here is the updated one: http://paste.ubuntu.com/471188/ [19:12] the problem files are : logcollect.py and logviewer.py [19:13] lfaraone, I ran lintian -iIv on *.changes file.. still no "W: sugar-record-activity source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends sugar-record-activity" [19:14] http://paste.ubuntu.com/471190/ [19:15] manusheel, lfaraone ping [19:15] hm, odd. [19:15] dfarning: actually, I'm on my way out to give the dog a walk, it's been a while. can I get back to you in 15? [19:16] lfaraone: Sure. [19:16] lfaraone, sure. I am having network issues..... I also need to read the links you sent. [19:16] fair enough. [19:16] manusheel, I ping you when I get done reading. [19:16] dfarning: Sure. [19:19] manusheel, dfarning : I need help with the first license [19:19] http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/sugar-log-activity.git;a=blob;f=debian/copyright;h=b5ec0e031d0ae259c63e1f61c901e605afed5b19;hb=HEAD [19:20] how to include two license in a copyright file? [19:20] I am unable to find such example in chat -speak -connect -activities [19:23] dipankar: Kindly ask this question at debian olpc mailing list. [19:23] Copy Luke. [19:24] neeraj, kandarpk: Do you know the answer to this question? [19:24] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ [19:24] dipankar ^^ [19:25] manusheel sir, dipankar : I am not able to understand what problem dipankar is facing [19:25] dipankar see Standalone License Section [19:27] kandarpk, neeraj, the problem is : I am unable to find the proper name of the license used here (the first one) : http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/sugar-log-activity.git;a=blob;f=debian/copyright;h=b5ec0e031d0ae259c63e1f61c901e605afed5b19;hb=HEAD [19:29] dipankar, did u tried copyright_hints? [19:29] neeraj: that might not help much [19:30] dipankar: no idea. [19:32] there is no copyright_hints file too [19:32] :( [19:32] kandarpk, dipankar goggling the text help :) [19:32] its under MIT License http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License [19:32] see License Terms [19:33] neeraj, great [19:33] :) [19:33] I never thought two paragraphs can be searched online now [19:33] :P [19:34] :) [19:35] aah [19:35] this is X11 [19:35] license :) [19:37] yes.. other-X11 [19:55] lfaraone, I have made changes in the copyright [19:56] * dipankar says a good night and great day to all [20:00] * lfaraone is back. [20:02] lfaraone: great. [20:02] manusheel: do you ever sleep? :) [20:03] lfaraone: Lately, I have been sleeping very little :-) [20:04] lfaraone: CTCP time ? [20:05] lfaraone, can you send me the list of patch types you sent on gchat a few minutes ago? [20:07] manusheel: it queries you for your local time. [20:07] dfarning: let me see. [20:07] lfaraone: 12:37 am [20:08] A. only useful in ubuntu [20:08] B. useful for debian [20:08] C. useful for upstream (and debian) [20:08] D. cherrypicked from upstream or debian [20:09] ideally, all of our ubuntu-local patches fit into A or D, ie they're either not useful outside of Ubuntu or they've already been included in Debian and/or upstream trunk. (.. and are just being backported) [20:09] if we follow the upstream first policy for anything that could possibly have a value outside of Ubuntu, we will have very few problems. [20:09] if you push the changes as far as debian, patch management is easier. [20:09] lfaraone, thanks [20:11] lfaraone: Is "git repo already exists" the reason behind not packaging Chat? [20:11] I think we should be packaging Chat. [20:11] Git repo exists is a use-case, right? [20:12] manusheel: I didn't write that, but it probably means that Chat is already packaged. [20:12] manusheel: -> http://packages.debian.org/sid/sugar-chat-activity-0.86 [20:13] lfaraone: Ok. For 0.88? [20:14] Is it packaged? [20:14] manusheel: yes, in http://packages.debian.org/sid/sugar-chat-activity-0.86. [20:31] dfarning: so, two new packages were sponsored by LI Daobing today into the archive, and are currently in NEW. [20:34] lfaraone, I saw that. Thanks. Are the more activities in your queue that are ready to be pushed? [20:35] dfarning: poll. [20:36] dfarning: should we clear out comments for activities / their ITP bug number when they're uploaded? [20:36] dfarning: (having r+s on uploaded activities makes it hard to grep through the table. [20:38] lfaraone, I think so. Once we are done with the initial package I think we will be done with the table. [20:39] lfaraone, on second though maybe we should keep the table to help the new team members work through the process as they work though new packages. [20:39] lfaraone: Thanks. [20:40] dfarning: maybe create a [[Sugar/tasks/archive]]? [20:40] lfaraone, +1 [20:41] lfaraone, +1 [20:44] lfaraone: We would like to package Turtle Art and sugar pippy too. [20:44] manusheel: Pippy is already packaged. [20:44] What is stopping pippy? I think it has been packaged. [20:45] manusheel: nothing is stopping Pippy, because it's already in Debian and Ubuntu. [20:45] lfaraone: Yes, this is what I wrote above. However, we do need to update it. [20:45] Right? [20:45] manusheel: not if I recall correctly. [20:46] lfaraone: Ok. I'll check this part. How about Turtle Art and Paint? [20:47] manusheel: you'd have to ask ankur about Paint. [20:47] Do you have Matt's e-mail id? === neeraj_gupta is now known as neeraj [20:47] manusheel: mattva01 SWIRL gmail POKE com [20:49] lfaraone: Thanks. [20:49] Will write to Matt. [20:49] lfaraone: Turtle art too has not been pacakaged, right? [20:49] packaged* [20:49] manusheel: he's doing that, yes. [20:51] manusheel, will you write to matt on the sugar team mailing list? He is subscribed. [20:52] dfarning: Yes, will write to him asking on updates. [20:52] lfaraone: Thanks Luke for the info. [20:53] dfarning: What is the status of browse? [20:54] lfaraone, is it possiable to reassign all bugs currently going to olpc-debian to sugar team in launch pad? [20:55] lfaraone: e-toys marked for review by Ankur. [20:55] Wish if you could review it. [20:55] lfaraone, what should I do with s-record-a (as I have told you I am not getting that warning which you told me to override.) [20:55] manusheel: do you want me to drop what I'm doing and take a look at it right now? [20:55] lfaraone: Meeting Kandarp, Ankur and Neeraj in some hours from now. [20:56] lfaraone:Luke, you can have a look at it after what you are doing now. [20:56] My apologies. [20:56] manusheel: no worries. he just marked it for review 4 minutes ago, so I'll get to it eventually, unless you want to make it a priority. [20:56] manusheel, something in one of the browse dependancies is causing sugar to crash... Raul and lucian are looking at it. [20:56] right now I'm looking at speak. [20:56] dfarning: I'm pretty sure it's py-gi. [20:57] dfarning: tomeu recommended either having py-gi updated to a newer version or using an older version of py-gi. [20:57] (pygobject too) [20:57] lfaraone, yes that is it. [20:57] s/older/ older stable version/ [20:57] lfaraone: newer pygobect has pygi included, so that's the logical step forward [20:57] note that pygi is not a browse dependency atm [20:58] lucian: it's a surf dep, though, right? [20:58] lfaraone: no [20:58] lucian: oh? [21:02] dfarning: Ok. Thanks for the update. [21:03] lfaraone: Yes, please try to review e-toys today. Would like Ankur to spend quality time on its documentation as soon as we get r+. [21:05] manusheel, at this point browse is at a point where it is a technical decsion between lfaraone, lucian, rgs_ and tomeu how to proced with pygi package. [21:05] manusheel: well, pygi / pygobject isn't maintained by anybody I know. [21:05] * dfarning [21:05] dfarning: so it'd be a discussion with the maintainer. [21:06] dfarning: Yes, David. Wish to get some idea on its roadmap. [21:08] Got disconnected, chatting from my phone [21:08] lfaraone, +1 and that is a discussion for you guys to have with the maintainer. neither manu or I understand the tech well enough to have a opinion on how to procced. [21:08] lucian, ^^ [21:09] Lost some backlog [21:09] Last thing I saw was my own message about pywebkitgtk [21:09] lfaraone: Ok. Pygobject is very useful. [21:10] And Pygi too. [21:10] Not, sure, why it has not been maintained. [21:10] lucian: send me your e-mail id. [21:10] Will send you the logs [21:10] lucian, http://pastebin.org/434166 [21:10] In case you didn't know, pygi was merged into pygobject [21:10] lucian: so I've heard :) [21:11] Lucian dot branescu at gmail dot com [21:11] lucian: I didn't heard that. Thanks for the update. [21:11] Pygobject 2.14.5 or so has pygi [21:12] But it's still far from being able to replace pygtk for example [21:12] lucian: Ok. [21:13] So nothing in sugar uses pygi right know afaik [21:14] And surf will have to use it in order to ever be merged back to mainline [21:15] Because pywebkitgtk is buggy and unmaintained and libsoup has no usable python binding (but it's required for feature parity with browse-hulahop) [21:16] I fear that surf will spearhead porting to pygi [21:38] manusheel: etoys rejected, small change, but a large issue. [21:41] lfaraone, filling sync request for sugar-pippy-activity, using requestsync [21:41] requestsync --lp -s -d unstable sugar-pippy-activity [21:42] ^^ seems fine or I need to change something? [21:42] neeraj: sure. [21:46] dfarning: right now speak embeds pyamil and pyalice. Should I mention that in my review email, and tell them to go package those components, or should I just leave them embedded? [21:49] lfaraone, I think we need to split it up or it will not meet debian standards. Is that correct? [21:50] dfarning: while it's technically possible to ship it this way, I would not personally sponsor such a package unless it was impossible or infeasable to unbundle. [21:51] lfaraone, then let's try to split it up. [21:53] lfaraone, some has already requested for sync for s-pippy-activity :) https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sugar-pippy-activity/+bug/608766 [21:54] s/some/someone [21:54] neeraj: mk then :) [21:58] dfarning: okay. should we task someone with it, or should I do it? [22:03] lfaraone, please ask manusheel to assign someone. [22:03] manusheel: ^^ [22:11] manusheel, lfaraone to prevent confusion, I am going to merge the https://launchpad.net/usr and https://launchpad.net/sugar they are very reduntant. [22:12] lfaraone, manusheel does ^^ sound sane? [22:12] dfarning: ideally /sugar is for the upstream sugar projecft. [22:13] lfaraone, it seems rather confusing? [22:13] dfarning: agreed. [22:13] lfaraone, how should we fix the problem? [22:14] dfarning: well, we could disambiguate "this is for upstream sugar. sugar devel is coordinated at URL. if you're looking for sugar on Ubuntu, see URL" [22:16] lfaraone, need to go will be back in a couple hours [22:21] lfaraone, I have requested for sync for sugar-(toolkit,base,artwork,presence-service)-0.88. requestsync is indeed a very useful and easy to use tool :) [22:21] neeraj: yepp :) [22:21] * lfaraone is currently planning for DebConf. [23:19] neeraj, ping [23:19] dfarning: yes [23:20] ready for the next task? [23:21] dfarning: sure :) [23:23] neeraj, next thing I would like you to start on is bugtracking and patch tracking. [23:24] neeraj, do you remember the bug where when you start sugar the mouse buttons no longer work in gnome? [23:25] dfarning: I didn't faced the bug. Ankur and other team member faced it. [23:25] s/the/that [23:26] neeraj, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sugar/+bug/479179 [23:27] neeraj, That bug still exists in 10.10./ [23:28] Though I remember that Dipankar used a patch to fix it [23:28] dfarning: ok. [23:28] neeraj, We are going to have to find out which patch dipandkar used to fix the patch and apply it to 10.10 [23:29] dfarning: sure. Give a min to search logs and previous progress report. [23:32] http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/06/25/%23ubuntu-sugarteam.html#t14:14 [23:32] * now looking for exact patch [23:33] http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/06/25/%23ubuntu-sugarteam.html#t15:10 [23:35] neeraj, A good way to find the patch is to download the source package and look in the debian/patches dir. [23:35] dfarning: ok I think I knw what needs to be done :).. [23:36] http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/jhconvert/repos/mainline/blobs/master/patches/0.86/1544.patch see this [23:36] this is why we keep the patches the special dir. [23:37] dfarning: in sugar-0.XX/bin folder there must be a sugar-session file [23:37] In that I need to change client.set_string field (line 7 and 8) [23:38] line 7 and eight* [23:38] and create a debdiff file. [23:42] neeraj, there should allready be a patch in the sugar package in the ppa.... we can reuse that patch. [23:42] dfarning: Ok. I can also try to see the exact patch from patches directory. [23:43] neeraj, +1 [23:43] dfarning: Ok. Lemme check the sugar ppa then [23:43]