| simar | If the FTBFS starts building automatically then what to do? Should I create a bug for it... | 06:53 |
|---|---|---|
| and471 | is it possible (and if so, can someone point me to a guide) to update a package using the ubuntu bzr branch | 08:35 |
| and471 | i.e. https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/maverick/lernid/maverick | 08:35 |
| and471 | and then the upstream bzr branch | 08:35 |
| and471 | i.e. https://code.launchpad.net/~lernid-devs/lernid/trunk | 08:35 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| geser | and471: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DistributedDevelopment/Documentation has some documentation, perhaps it helps you further | 08:45 |
| and471 | geser, thanks | 08:46 |
| geser | one can use those packaging branches to create the next package revision but an upload with "dput" is still needed | 08:46 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| and471 | geser, after following instructions here https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Recipes/PackageUpdate I have updated the package, however I don't have upload privelledges so do I need to create a debdiff? | 09:17 |
| geser | or a merge proposal | 09:21 |
| and471 | geser, which is it I need to create? | 09:21 |
| geser | when working with branches it's IMHO better to also create a merge proposal (but as usual depends on your sponsor) | 09:22 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| ari-tczew | BlackZ: ping bug 598184 | 12:40 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 598184 in cynthiune.app (Ubuntu) "Please merge cynthiune.app 0.9.5-10 (universe) from debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/598184 | 12:40 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| BlackZ | ari-tczew: feel free to take it, if you want | 12:48 |
| ari-tczew | ok | 12:49 |
| ari-tczew | who from MOTU uses amarok? | 13:34 |
| ari-tczew | or clementine? | 13:34 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| coolbhavi | bdrung, I have attached a patch that ignores guile-pg build error there | 15:00 |
| coolbhavi | :) | 15:00 |
| ari-tczew | o, hey coolbhavi | 15:02 |
| ari-tczew | I want to comment on your application | 15:02 |
| coolbhavi | hey ari-tczew | 15:02 |
| coolbhavi | Its on the DMB agenda | 15:03 |
| coolbhavi | wiki link i meant | 15:03 |
| bdrung | coolbhavi: please use "Closes" instead of "DBTS". you could drop the rm command instead of making it ignoring errors | 15:14 |
| coolbhavi | bdrung, okay thanks for the review! | 15:16 |
| shadeslayer | ari-tczew: btw .. were you approved as MOTU? | 15:21 |
| ari-tczew | shadeslayer: never, huh? | 15:21 |
| shadeslayer | er what? | 15:21 |
| shadeslayer | were or were you not? :P | 15:21 |
| ari-tczew | shadeslayer: I'm not in MOTU. | 15:22 |
| shadeslayer | ok .. :) | 15:22 |
| ari-tczew | shadeslayer: everybody can comment on expectant's application. | 15:23 |
| ari-tczew | you, me... | 15:23 |
| ari-tczew | sponsors usually gives endorments | 15:23 |
| shadeslayer | yes.. but i just wanted to know what happened to *your* application :P | 15:24 |
| ari-tczew | shadeslayer: my applications was rejected. | 15:24 |
| shadeslayer | ok.. sorry to hear that | 15:24 |
| ari-tczew | shadeslayer: lol, I didn't cry due to this. | 15:24 |
| shadeslayer | :P | 15:25 |
| shadeslayer | why would you :D | 15:25 |
| ari-tczew | shadeslayer: you can read my application in current state. | 15:25 |
| shadeslayer | ari-tczew: sure .. | 15:26 |
| coolbhavi | done bdrung_ thanks | 15:26 |
| ari-tczew | shadeslayer: when do you plan approve ? | 15:26 |
| shadeslayer | approve? | 15:27 |
| shadeslayer | im not MOTU :P | 15:27 |
| ari-tczew | shadeslayer: I'm asking when do you plan applicate | 15:27 |
| shadeslayer | ah.. well .. i think in another 2 months | 15:27 |
| coolbhavi | shadeslayer, good luck! | 15:27 |
| shadeslayer | right now college + kubuntu ninjas keep me busy :D | 15:27 |
| shadeslayer | coolbhavi: ah thanks :D | 15:28 |
| shadeslayer | coolbhavi: same to you too dude :) | 15:28 |
| bdrung_ | coolbhavi: and you can combine "(LP: #611965) (Closes: #590952)" to "(LP: #611965, Closes: #590952)" or more common "(Closes: #590952, LP: #611965)" | 15:28 |
| coolbhavi | bdrung_, okay! | 15:28 |
| bdrung_ | coolbhavi: that looks better :) | 15:28 |
| coolbhavi | :) | 15:29 |
| bdrung_ | coolbhavi: and please update the title + bug description | 15:29 |
| ari-tczew | bdrung_: which program for music do you use? | 15:29 |
| coolbhavi | bdrung_, sure! | 15:29 |
| bdrung_ | ari-tczew: look at my debian qa site: xmms2 | 15:29 |
| bdrung_ | and audacious | 15:29 |
| ari-tczew | bdrung_: could you review clementine? | 15:30 |
| ari-tczew | it;s in REVU queue with 1 sponsors comment. 2nd comment needed | 15:30 |
| bdrung_ | ari-tczew: link? | 15:31 |
| bdrung_ | ari-tczew: what are the plans for debian? | 15:31 |
| ari-tczew | bdrung_: I didn't create the package, but I think about it. | 15:32 |
| ari-tczew | bdrung_: http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?upid=8134 | 15:32 |
| ari-tczew | it's great | 15:33 |
| ari-tczew | Wyświetl tekst transliterowany na alfabet łaciński | 15:33 |
| ari-tczew | successor | 15:33 |
| ari-tczew | for amarok 1.4 | 15:33 |
| ari-tczew | wtf copy failed ;p | 15:33 |
| ari-tczew | bdrung_: I don't use a Debian. Could I be a maintainer then? | 15:40 |
| coolbhavi | ari-tczew, yeah | 15:41 |
| coolbhavi | if you work on ITP in debian | 15:41 |
| coolbhavi | but you have to mention that you have based the work on ubuntu package | 15:41 |
| coolbhavi | in the changelog | 15:42 |
| bdrung_ | ari-tczew: yes. you should have debian installed somewhere to do test (in rare casses a bug occurs only in debian and not in ubuntu). i have debian installed on a separate hard drive and in kvm. | 15:42 |
| coolbhavi | ari-tczew, http://packages.qa.debian.org/e/emu8051/news/20100617T184717Z.html I did the same wrt emu8051 | 15:43 |
| coolbhavi | bdrung_, arent debian and ubuntu chroots different? | 15:43 |
| ari-tczew | bdrung_: I got a 20gb disk and I can install Debian there. | 15:43 |
| bdrung_ | coolbhavi: yes. i use pbuilder to do the building. | 15:44 |
| coolbhavi | bdrung_, okay! | 15:45 |
| bdrung_ | coolbhavi: in most cases i build the package locally until i am ready and then i use pbuilder to build it for the target distribution | 15:46 |
| coolbhavi | bdrung_, okay is there any trick to mimic sid chroot on ubuntu? | 15:47 |
| bdrung_ | coolbhavi: it's possible. i use pbuilder for it, which creates the chroot for you. | 15:48 |
| coolbhavi | bdrung_, okay let me try I have been using sbuild on sid thanks for clearing my doubt :) | 15:49 |
| ari-tczew | does someone know whether can I check DDoS attack on my router? | 15:50 |
| porthose | coolbhavi, http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/maverick/man1/pbuilder-dist.1.html | 15:50 |
| coolbhavi | thanks porthose will try tonight | 15:51 |
| porthose | coolbhavi, I find it very useful :) | 15:52 |
| coolbhavi | :) | 15:52 |
| ari-tczew | porthose: could you sponsors some patches for me? | 15:52 |
| porthose | ari-tczew, sure, I can have a look later tonight, but right now I have to go put the timing belt back on my car :( | 15:53 |
| bdrung_ | ari-tczew: package reviewed | 15:54 |
| ari-tczew | BlackZ: is it possible to forward changes from giftrans package? | 16:07 |
| X3 | hey Im trying to compile new upstream of ntfs-3g 5.22 stable when I run pdebuild I get http://pastebin.com/hZxQNDPF | 16:16 |
| X3 | can anyone help | 16:19 |
| shadeslayer | dude be patient :) | 16:20 |
| shadeslayer | idk the error as well :p | 16:21 |
| Bachstelze | X3: probably depends on a more recent FUSE version | 16:46 |
| Bachstelze | X3: similar bug in Gentoo was fixed by making ntfs-3g depend on FUSE 2.8.0: http://bugs.gentoo.org/320579 | 16:47 |
| Bachstelze | right now, you're using 2.7.4 | 16:47 |
| X3 | ive backported 2.81 lemme see | 16:48 |
| X3 | i made it depend on 2.8.1 as well | 17:05 |
| X3 | lemme try again | 17:05 |
| shadeslayer | X3: btw after your done with ntfs 3g, maybe you can port it to maverick ;) | 17:10 |
| X3 | its not working | 17:14 |
| X3 | keeps failing | 17:14 |
| X3 | im too green to make this work | 17:16 |
| coolbhavi | X3, can you post log now? | 17:16 |
| X3 | sec | 17:17 |
| X3 | http://pastebin.com/sUdLJgqk | 17:20 |
| X3 | there | 17:20 |
| coolbhavi | same error hmm | 17:21 |
| geser | check if a header file from fuse has this defines | 17:21 |
| coolbhavi | geser, +1 | 17:22 |
| X3 | wheres the file and what? | 17:22 |
| X3 | sorry < noob | 17:22 |
| geser | if you don't want to install libfuse-dev, unpack it into some temporary directory and check then (rgrep) | 17:23 |
| coolbhavi | X3, that means check the source for a header file which contains the function which is causing FTBFS | 17:24 |
| geser | and I see that the second log has also "Setting up libfuse-dev (2.7.4-1.1ubuntu4)". Didn't you update the fuse package? | 17:24 |
| X3 | mate thats way too technincal | 17:24 |
| X3 | ya I update it it | 17:25 |
| geser | but your pbuilder doesn't use it (yet). It still used the old one | 17:25 |
| X3 | idk | 17:25 |
| X3 | how can I clean it and start again | 17:26 |
| geser | pbuilder starts always from clean | 17:26 |
| X3 | Package: libfuse-dev | 17:26 |
| X3 | State: installed | 17:26 |
| X3 | Automatically installed: no | 17:27 |
| X3 | Version: 2.8.1-1.1ubuntu2~karmic1~ppa1 | 17:27 |
| X3 | Priority: optional | 17:27 |
| X3 | Section: libdevel | 17:27 |
| geser | it unpacks the base.tgz, chroots into it, tries building the package there and cleans up afterwards (deletes the unpacked base.tgz again) | 17:27 |
| X3 | ah | 17:27 |
| X3 | idk why it keeps installing the old fuse | 17:29 |
| geser | because the old one is the repositories your pbuilder uses, and the new one isn't | 17:29 |
| X3 | so how can I fix that? | 17:30 |
| geser | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto#Building%20With%20Local%20Packages | 17:31 |
| X3 | thx | 17:33 |
| X3 | my brain hurts nnow | 17:33 |
| X3 | one would think this be all automated | 17:33 |
| coolbhavi | yes you can use PPA for that X3 | 17:35 |
| coolbhavi | I think | 17:35 |
| X3 | ya well some of this is well beyond skills | 17:35 |
| X3 | specially when guys that know better go I think | 17:36 |
| X3 | im too noob | 17:36 |
| geser | we all started with no knowledge how all this works | 17:37 |
| X3 | ya i bet | 17:37 |
| X3 | only i have a lack of brain | 17:38 |
| X3 | :) | 17:38 |
| coolbhavi | X3, chill mate we have all been through that stage :) | 17:41 |
| X3 | :/ | 17:42 |
| X3 | http://pastebin.com/hBcNVW1z | 17:53 |
| X3 | idk | 17:53 |
| X3 | i give | 17:54 |
| coolbhavi | X3, can you upload to a PPA and try if not to check | 17:55 |
| X3 | ill try | 17:56 |
| X3 | signed them and uploading | 17:59 |
| coolbhavi | :) | 18:00 |
| X3 | now wait for 3 days | 18:00 |
| X3 | and see if it fails too | 18:00 |
| coolbhavi | X3, yeah due to upload queue :) | 18:00 |
| X3 | https://edge.launchpad.net/~x3lectric/+archive/experimental | 18:00 |
| X3 | thats where I uloaded this to | 18:01 |
| coolbhavi | great :) | 18:01 |
| X3 | so if this fails up there then what? | 18:01 |
| coolbhavi | X3, patching the ftbfs :) | 18:02 |
| X3 | is there like any other pdebuild commands I could run to try | 18:03 |
| coolbhavi | X3, no its automated buildd | 18:03 |
| X3 | :( | 18:03 |
| X3 | i thought you knew some cheat | 18:03 |
| X3 | got email packages accepted ok | 18:05 |
| coolbhavi | X3, only thing is you can have a PPA dependency or which of the ubuntu release pockets to be enabled within your PPA | 18:05 |
| X3 | what dependency | 18:06 |
| X3 | now its Use all Ubuntu components available. | 18:06 |
| X3 | and default | 18:06 |
| coolbhavi | X3, PPA dependencies like you depend on other PPA's components | 18:06 |
| coolbhavi | read up more on launchpad help :) | 18:07 |
| X3 | ya but do nyou recommend I select a ppa which builds ntfs-3g | 18:08 |
| coolbhavi | no | 18:08 |
| coolbhavi | unless you use some bleeding edge stuff | 18:08 |
| coolbhavi | to build packages on your PPA | 18:08 |
| X3 | its not withing ubuntu | 18:09 |
| X3 | ubuntu is 3.6 | 18:09 |
| X3 | im trying to compile and build on ppa 5.22 | 18:09 |
| coolbhavi | no problems | 18:09 |
| X3 | which is actually stable | 18:09 |
| X3 | but im building from source | 18:10 |
| coolbhavi | what counts is the versions of the Build-Depends | 18:10 |
| coolbhavi | during build | 18:10 |
| X3 | on ppa | 18:10 |
| coolbhavi | yeah | 18:10 |
| X3 | so its gonna depend on fuse 2.8.1 | 18:11 |
| X3 | cause i made it depend on that | 18:11 |
| X3 | doesnt it make sense then to add the fuse ppa as a dependency? | 18:12 |
| coolbhavi | yeah the latest version of the package available in ubuntu pockets | 18:12 |
| X3 | thats just it | 18:12 |
| coolbhavi | if fuse-ppa has latest version of fuse built fine | 18:13 |
| coolbhavi | then you can check | 18:13 |
| X3 | I backported the fuse i made it depend | 18:13 |
| X3 | no the default ppa is 2.7.4 | 18:13 |
| coolbhavi | but caution is PPA software is unstable most times and it could break the build | 18:14 |
| X3 | idk | 18:14 |
| coolbhavi | thats why PPA dependency is not recommended | 18:14 |
| X3 | well no matter | 18:14 |
| coolbhavi | except if you want to test bleeding edge stuff | 18:15 |
| coolbhavi | :) | 18:15 |
| X3 | the ppa i uploaded ntfs-3g 5.22 already has fuse 2.8.1 built in | 18:15 |
| coolbhavi | hope this clears it | 18:15 |
| coolbhavi | :) | 18:15 |
| X3 | thats where I backported fuse to | 18:15 |
| X3 | bleeding edge is svn | 18:15 |
| X3 | im using a stable release 5.22 | 18:16 |
| X3 | since old ubuntu 3.6 has a many bugs this fixes | 18:16 |
| coolbhavi | then no problems :) | 18:16 |
| coolbhavi | in giving a shot | 18:16 |
| X3 | idk im well confused | 18:16 |
| coolbhavi | X3, well this happens as time goes you ll get hold of it :) | 18:17 |
| coolbhavi | anyways its latenight here | 18:18 |
| X3 | you hope | 18:18 |
| coolbhavi | goodnight all | 18:18 |
| X3 | nite man and thx | 18:18 |
| coolbhavi | X3, no mention | 18:18 |
| X3 | just dont have any wet dreams | 18:18 |
| coolbhavi | sure! | 18:18 |
| shadeslayer | hmm | 18:23 |
| shadeslayer | anyone notice why nvidia-current does not have a dep on linux-headers? | 18:23 |
| shadeslayer | because without linux-headers, nvidia-current is fail :P | 18:24 |
| X3 | eh ntfs-3g is already building | 18:29 |
| X3 | ah no | 18:29 |
| X3 | https://launchpad.net/~x3lectric/+archive/experimental/+builds?build_text=&build_state=all | 19:12 |
| X3 | its building?? wt? | 19:13 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| ximion_ | Is someone interested in reviewing my package oxygen-molecule ( http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/oxygen-molecule ) | 19:47 |
| ximion_ | (Provides a GTK+-Theme for better integration of GTK+-apps in the KDE4 desktop) | 19:47 |
| shadeslayer | ximion_: it wont be packaged | 19:49 |
| shadeslayer | theres a valid reason for it | 19:52 |
| ximion_ | shadeslayer: What do you mean? s/packages/sponsored/g ? | 19:52 |
| shadeslayer | err... | 19:52 |
| shadeslayer | ximion_: i meant it wont be included in archives... | 19:52 |
| shadeslayer | licensing issues i see | 19:53 |
| shadeslayer | or wait one sec | 19:53 |
| ximion_ | shadeslayer: I thoght i resolved all license issues with upstream. | 19:54 |
| shadeslayer | yes i just saw that :) | 19:54 |
| ximion_ | ...he told me that all designes are GPLv3 licensed, including the stuff he took from another theme. | 19:54 |
| shadeslayer | oh this went all messy... i confused it with bug 430013 | 19:55 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 430013 in kubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) "Oxygen-Molecule for Kubuntu" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/430013 | 19:55 |
| shadeslayer | ximion_: carry on please :) | 19:55 |
| shadeslayer | extremly sorry for the confusion | 19:56 |
| shadeslayer | *extremely | 19:56 |
| ximion_ | this bug was about making oxygen-molecule *default* in Kubuntu, like openSUSE did... I just want to have it in the repos, not more :) | 19:56 |
| ximion_ | shadeslayer: no problem :-D | 19:57 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| ximion | shadeslayer: any news? | 20:28 |
| shadeslayer | ximion: er what? | 20:29 |
| shadeslayer | im no MOTU ;) | 20:29 |
| ximion | shadeslayer: ...but you can comment on packages :P | 20:29 |
| ximion | anyway, I better wait for Jonathan Thomas to comment on the package. | 20:30 |
| shadeslayer | ximion: you might find him on #kubuntu-devel | 20:30 |
| shadeslayer | if he doesnt idle here | 20:31 |
| ximion | shadeslayer: Thanks! I'm not at the Kubuntu channel, so I can't know if he's there. | 20:32 |
| shadeslayer | hes not atm ;) | 20:32 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| ari-tczew | porthose: thanks for sponsoring! I look forward to get more cooperate with you :) | 22:02 |
| bdrung_ | \o/ sponsoring queue under 200 again | 22:27 |
| carstenh | if someone wants to change this ... aegir-provision/sid fixes two rc bugs ;) | 22:30 |
| crimsun | which LP bug reports? | 22:34 |
| bdrung_ | carstenh: porthose requested a sync: bug #610655 | 22:36 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 610655 in aegir-provision (Ubuntu) "Sync aegir-provision 0.3-2.2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/610655 | 22:36 |
| carstenh | you are really fast :) | 22:37 |
| bdrung_ | carstenh: he requested it three days ago :) | 22:38 |
| carstenh | bdrung_: wow, that is _really_ fast :) | 22:39 |
| carstenh | from the changelog: "Works at least for new installations; and as the package hasn't been part of a stable release, that should be okay" - this is wrong for ubuntu, maybe someone should take a closer look at it before it is synced | 22:39 |
| bdrung_ | porthose: ^ | 22:39 |
| carstenh | if it does not work for upgrades and someone comes up with a clean solution I could sponsor a delayed NMU to debian sid | 22:44 |
| * porthose places #610655 on his TODO list | 22:49 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!