bobby | Why do I get this when trying to go to different sites in FF4.0b3pre? | 00:58 |
---|---|---|
bobby | Your browser sent a request that this server could not understand. | 00:58 |
bobby | Size of a request header field exceeds server limit. | 00:58 |
* gnomefreak never seen that before | 01:00 | |
gnomefreak | or heard of it for that matter | 01:00 |
gnomefreak | bobby: do you have a link | 01:00 |
bobby | Of the siite? It happens when I try to go to YouTube or CNET | 01:01 |
bobby | I have a Cookie if you want | 01:01 |
gnomefreak | bobby: im gonna guess and say its the server not you, but i would like to test it first | 01:01 |
bobby | No | 01:01 |
bobby | It happens when going to multiple sites | 01:01 |
bobby | They work in Chrome | 01:01 |
gnomefreak | i dont have an issue in youtube | 01:01 |
bobby | FF4.0b3pre | 01:01 |
gnomefreak | 4.0~b3~hg20100730r48391+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1 | 01:02 |
bobby | yup... | 01:02 |
bobby | Here is the cookie I get: | 01:02 |
bobby | Cookie: tempSessionId=Cg+ND0xKAmtGtRK1kIY; arrowLat=1280446397983; arrowSpc=20; mad_rsi_segs=ASK05540_10274&ASK05540_10018&ASK05540_10019&ASK05540_10066&ASK05540_10161&ASK05540_10166&ASK05540_10195&ASK05540_10205&ASK05540_10206&ASK05540_10207&ASK05540_10208&ASK05540_10214&ASK05540_10219&ASK05540_10221&ASK05540_10225&ASK05540_10236&ASK05540_10241&ASK05540_10242&ASK05540_10258&ASK05540_10264&ASK05540_10267&ASK05540_10268&ASK05540_102 | 01:02 |
bobby | 83&ASK05540_10288&ASK05540_10289&ASK05540_10290&ASK05540_10314&ASK05540_10322&ASK05540_10333&ASK05540_10339&ASK05540_10342&ASK05540_10343&ASK05540_10349&ASK05540_10389&ASK05540_10432&ASK05540_10483&ASK05540_10521; XCLGFbrowser=Cg+IKExKAmxOAQAAXgA; MADUCAT=1&0729&EX; cnet_joinCallout=true; purs_1=12333b15569cc78cce36ca1b76af9e564c4a027923154810881174864815860519346955!e00!01lWfGxQM1VCryQZeE!wQhb43tUc5EtJ58r8oRvrdtOenwgf2wDLSefK%2FKE | 01:02 |
bobby | b60hh39R66BioA%3D%3D; MADCAPP=0a3klD=4&3klE=5&3jlu&3hlt=3; arrowFdCounter=-1; globid=1.lWfGxQM1VCryQZeE; cnet_rvpCallout=3; ZZFLSH=29; nemo=mvt:8:14:1; s_vsn_diggcomsyndication_1=9563975783937; arrowLat=1280502295879; arrowSpc=8; mad_rsi_segs=ASK05540_10274&ASK05540_10018&ASK05540_10019&ASK05540_10066&ASK05540_10161&ASK05540_10166&ASK05540_10195&ASK05540_10205&ASK05540_10206&ASK05540_10207&ASK05540_10208&ASK05540_10214&ASK05540_102 | 01:02 |
bobby | 19&ASK05540_10221&ASK05540_10225&ASK05540_10236&ASK05540_10241&ASK05540_10242&ASK05540_10258&ASK05540_10264&ASK05540_10267&ASK05540_10268&ASK05540_10283&ASK05540_10288&ASK05540_10289&ASK05540_10290&ASK05540_10314&ASK05540_10322&ASK05540_10333&ASK05540_10339&ASK05540_10342&ASK05540_10343&ASK05540_10349&ASK05540_10389&ASK05540_10432&ASK05540_10483&ASK05540_10521; MADUCAT=1&0730&EX; arrowLat=1280516712752; arrowSpc=1; mad_rsi_segs=ASK | 01:02 |
bobby | 05540_10274&ASK05540_10018&ASK05540_10019&ASK05540_10066&ASK05540_10161&ASK05540_10166&ASK05540_10195&ASK05540_10205&ASK05540_10206&ASK05540_10207&ASK05540_10208&ASK05540_10214&ASK05540_10219&ASK05540_10221&ASK05540_10225&ASK05540_10236&ASK05540_10241&ASK05540_10242&ASK05540_10258&ASK05540_10264&ASK05540_10 | 01:02 |
gnomefreak | i could have done without that in here | 01:02 |
bobby | oh... sorry :P | 01:02 |
bobby | Let's see... | 01:03 |
bobby | CENT doesn't work... YouTube | 01:03 |
bobby | Facebook works fine though... | 01:03 |
bobby | So does Google | 01:03 |
bobby | Apache server at www.youtube.com Port 80... | 01:04 |
=== gnomefreak76 is now known as gnomefreak | ||
bobby | Any suggestions? | 01:05 |
gnomefreak | bobby: any place in Cnet or any of it? | 01:05 |
bobby | Nope, none of it works | 01:05 |
bobby | Same with YouTube | 01:05 |
gnomefreak | deolete your cookies work? | 01:05 |
gnomefreak | delete even | 01:05 |
gnomefreak | 64bit was the next question | 01:06 |
bobby | Okay, that worked... | 01:06 |
bobby | Funny, as I cleaned my cache/cookies about 10 minutes ago... | 01:06 |
bobby | Thanks | 01:06 |
gnomefreak | :) | 01:06 |
gnomefreak | np | 01:06 |
bobby | That was strange, I've never had that happen before | 01:07 |
bobby | Any idea why? | 01:07 |
gnomefreak | bobby: nope | 01:08 |
bobby | Well, still waiting for Jager engine to be completed | 01:08 |
gnomefreak | size of cookie maybe | 01:08 |
bobby | I haven't been anywhere with epic cookies? | 01:08 |
bobby | Just Facebook... | 01:08 |
bobby | owait... | 01:08 |
gnomefreak | im seeing that every site you are mentioning is flash releated | 01:09 |
gnomefreak | ill be back need to reboot and hope it works | 01:09 |
bobby | kk cya | 01:09 |
bobby | Hey does anybody know a date for the UI update? | 01:14 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | hey folks | 11:16 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | is Micah about? | 11:17 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | micahg, hey, you about? | 11:17 |
micahg | ta_bu_shi_da_yu: hi | 15:56 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | micahg, hey! | 15:56 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | you sent me an email... | 15:57 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | bug 610039 | 15:57 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 610039 in firefox (Ubuntu) (and 2 other projects) "firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV in sqlite3VdbeExec() (affects: 2) (dups: 1) (heat: 22)" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/610039 | 15:57 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | wooo.... | 15:57 |
micahg | ta_bu_shi_da_yu: yes, so we use mostly in source libraries for Firefox to match the upstream build as close as possible, sqlite is one of those | 15:58 |
micahg | ta_bu_shi_da_yu: so we build a copy of sqlite in Firefox, which is why I said that Mozilla needs to patch their copy | 15:58 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | ah! sorry, didn't realise | 15:58 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | doesn't Michael Terry work for Canonical? | 16:00 |
micahg | ta_bu_shi_da_yu: if there's a bug in the Ubuntu sqlite3 package, we add a task for it | 16:00 |
micahg | ta_bu_shi_da_yu: yes, I think he does | 16:00 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | I was wondering if he could verify that is indeed the same issue... there's an easy test case | 16:01 |
micahg | ta_bu_shi_da_yu: but in this case, the bug doesn't actually affect the Ubuntu package (well, it might, but no one's reported it) | 16:01 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | well... sqlite3 is definitely affected | 16:01 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | if the index corrupts, then it segfaults | 16:01 |
micahg | ta_bu_shi_da_yu: right, but sqlite3 is used by a lot of apps, so an SRU is higher risk | 16:02 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | sorry, I'm kind of new to this... SRU? | 16:02 |
micahg | ta_bu_shi_da_yu: my guess is Firefox corrupted the index somehow, which is why it's more visible | 16:02 |
micahg | !sru | ta_bu_shi_da_yu | 16:02 |
ubot2 | ta_bu_shi_da_yu: Stable Release Update information is at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates | 16:02 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | ah... thanks :-) | 16:02 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | yeah, not sure how Firefox did this! | 16:03 |
micahg | ta_bu_shi_da_yu: Firefox gets regular updates though, so we can easily get the fix in if they take the patch in their source | 16:03 |
micahg | ta_bu_shi_da_yu: well, if it crashed at the wrong time, it might have corrupted the index | 16:03 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | well... I'm not sure that an SRU is necessary then... the issue is fixable by a reindex | 16:04 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | however... the problem is that when the index corrupts it means you can never run certain queries till you do a reindex | 16:05 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | and it's fairly tough to work out what's causing the issue... | 16:05 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | anyway... not a huge issue :-) all those apps that will be affected should really patch their sqlite3.c file | 16:05 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | I do have a question though... it's about PPAs | 16:06 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | am I allowed to upload deb files where I've recompiled Firefox but have turned off compiler optimizations? | 16:06 |
micahg | ta_bu_shi_da_yu: well, the other apps in teh archive should be using the sqlite3 package | 16:06 |
micahg | ta_bu_shi_da_yu: if you disable the official branding, Mozilla is very specific about who can use their branding | 16:07 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | no branding changes | 16:07 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | just rebuilt the firefox package with noopt | 16:07 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | it helps with getting to the bottom of segfaults | 16:07 |
micahg | ta_bu_shi_da_yu: yeah, I think you'd have to disable the branding since that could affect performance | 16:08 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | er... what branding? | 16:08 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | the package I'm running right now has the same branding... and I've turned off the optimization flags | 16:09 |
micahg | ta_bu_shi_da_yu: in debian/rules, I think you have to comment out the BUILD_OFFICIAL line | 16:09 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | didn't seem to need to... | 16:10 |
micahg | ta_bu_shi_da_yu: it's not needed to compile, it's needed to upload | 16:10 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | ah... sorry, I'm following :-) | 16:11 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | so if I do this, then I can upload? | 16:11 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | it might help others with segfaults | 16:12 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | I couldn't make any headway on that bug till I change the compilation option because for some reason the p variable was optimized out... | 16:12 |
micahg | ta_bu_shi_da_yu: well, what happens, you get less segfaults with the compiler optimizations off? | 16:13 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | nope... when I get a stacktrace I can see more relevant variables | 16:13 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | so for instance, the sql that was causing the crash got optimized out | 16:13 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | when I found the sql statement that caused the problem, I loaded places.sqlite into the sqlite3 shell, ran the query and reproduced the segfault | 16:14 |
micahg | weird, but maybe I don't understand compiler optimizations well enough | 16:14 |
micahg | chrisccoulson: around? do you see the above as a bug in Firefox? | 16:14 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | not a bug.... | 16:14 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | a way of tracking down the bug more easily :-) | 16:15 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | when you are developing/debugging it's standard practice to compile without optimizations | 16:15 |
micahg | ta_bu_shi_da_yu: right, but maybe we can do something more official to help... | 16:15 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | when you do a final release, you turn on the compiler optimizer | 16:15 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | :-) well, we provide debug symbols, which is quite cool | 16:16 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | it would be nice to have packages without optimization, of course only those actively tracking down segfaults where the optimization gets in the way would need it | 16:16 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | but for firefox, it's a huge package (takes up lots of disk space to compile!) so it would be handy to have a non-stripped, non-optimized version for this sort of thing | 16:17 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | it was also a pain having to force an uninstall for firefox, then reinstall it again... | 16:17 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | well... not that much of a pain :-) | 16:17 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | anyhow, I gotta get going - thanks for your time micahg :-) | 16:23 |
micahg | ta_bu_shi_da_yu: no problem, feel free to come back with any questions, and I'll see what we can do about debug builds | 16:24 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | thanks :-) It's rare I get crashes in Firefox... but I've been looking through the Mozilla bug database seeing if I can repro a few now that I've got a debugging version installed :-) | 16:25 |
ta_bu_shi_da_yu | night all! | 16:25 |
BUGabundo | that nick scared me | 16:30 |
vish | hmm , is there a way for me to assign a shortcut for search in FF ? like if i highlight a word in say xchat , and do a "alt+s" , it will open a search in FF? | 17:19 |
micahg | vish: I would guess jsut append to a goole query | 17:20 |
micahg | 17:20 | |
* vish tires.. | 17:20 | |
fta | micahg, http://people.ubuntu.com/~fta/ppa-dashboard/chromium-daily.html :( | 19:33 |
micahg | fta: I gave up after the first 2 rescores, sorry | 19:34 |
micahg | fta: I don't know if we'll get them back before alpha 3 is released | 19:47 |
micahg | fta: BTW, I just pushed tb3.1 | 19:47 |
micahg | bzr update | 19:47 |
fta | micahg, i'm not blaming you, it's just sad. they claim they want dailies, yet they don't have the resources | 20:05 |
micahg | right, and now they have soruce recipies to generate more builds | 20:06 |
micahg | at least amd64 is buildign this time | 20:06 |
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
chrisccoulson | grrrrrr, ubuntuzilla | 20:55 |
* chrisccoulson rages | 20:55 | |
micahg | chrisccoulson: I think the .la file issue is a regression by virtual of gdk-pixbuf being repackages | 20:58 |
micahg | *repackaged | 20:58 |
micahg | *virtue | 20:58 |
chrisccoulson | micahg - the la files have been deliberately removed due to a policy change, i think | 20:58 |
micahg | chrisccoulson: right, but packages that ship them are supposed to continue to ship them until they are remvoed | 20:59 |
micahg | chrisccoulson: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-libraries, near footnote 71 | 21:00 |
* micahg needs to read the whole manual one day | 21:01 | |
chrisccoulson | micahg - ah, ok. i'll try and have a look at that in a bit. it's g-c-u that is failing isn't it? | 21:02 |
micahg | chrisccoulson: yeah | 21:03 |
micahg | chrisccoulson: actually, I think I should just build against libgdk-pixbuf, that might fix it, let me test | 21:04 |
micahg | or rather libgdk-pixbuf2.0-dev | 21:07 |
micahg | nm, that was silly, it's a depends already :( | 21:12 |
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!