=== Cepheus is now known as ZhanZerv === ZhanZerv is now known as Cepheus === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === Cepheus is now known as Cepheus|Away [05:54] hi, how would I delete/remove a project registered by me? [06:02] sebi`: ask a question on Launchpad is the easiest trackable way [06:03] sebi`: which project? [06:03] on launchpad? what do you mean? [06:03] sebi`: https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+addquestion [06:03] sebi`: but if you tell me which, I could help [06:03] launchpad.net/frey is the project in question, I've discontinued it awhile ago (it's developed under a different name now and on a different site) [06:04] I've set the owner to the launchpad internals (so I believe...), that means, I can't really access anything there anymore :/ [06:05] anyway, since the project site isn't needed anymore, I thought I could as well get rid of it [06:06] sebi`: done [06:06] oh, thank you [06:07] also, out of curiousity, is Launchpad ever planning to support Git? [06:18] .. I guess not? :( [06:19] sebi`: sorry, was distracted [06:20] sebi`: at this stage there are no plans for native git support [06:34] thumper: oh, but you say native? does that mean there is some sort of a bazar<->git bridge? [06:34] sebi`: yes there is [06:34] sebi`: you can have a foreign mirror of git branches in bzr format [06:35] when I decided to abandon frey, I actually tried to maintain both the bazaar repository and the git repository, but that didn't work out so well (bzr kept appending .git* files, and other uncomfortable things) [06:35] nice, do you have a link or something similar with additional information? [06:36] sebi`: https://help.launchpad.net/Code/Imports [06:36] ah, thank you [06:37] although reading that I can see it isn't entirely up to date [06:37] oh :( [06:37] but in a good way [06:37] ... [06:37] kinda [06:39] okay [06:39] I think I'll just play around with my local bazaar/git servers, and try to figure out how the bridging-stuff works [06:40] sebi`: well if you have a git branch hosted publicly [06:40] sebi`: you can request a git import easily on the lp project [06:40] sebi`: and just give the git location [06:40] sebi`: and LP does the rest [06:40] sebi`: it uses the bzr-git plugin [06:41] ah [06:41] neat, in that case I might consider registering the newly named project at launchpad then [06:41] thank you, thumper [06:41] sebi`: np [06:51] thumper: project registered and import requested. that was much easier than expected :D [06:55] the importlog shows an error traceback, though [07:53] can any one help me in this W: GPG error: http://ppa.launchpad.net lucid Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 449F83829320B41C [07:59] bebo_mz: run the command [07:59] just a minute [07:59] ok [08:00] sudo apt-get update -o Acquire::http::No-Cache=True [08:00] run this command ^^ [08:00] what is my proplem [08:01] That's not the issue. [08:01] bebo_mz: How did you add the repository? [08:02] add what [08:02] The PPA. [08:02] some times by .deb [08:03] bilalakhtar : that still the same [08:04] W: GPG error: http://ppa.launchpad.net lucid Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 449F83829320B41C [08:05] bebo_mz: Make sure you have the key in the apt keyring [08:05] check [08:06] how that [08:06] bebo_mz: open software source [08:06] s [08:06] i open it now [08:07] and check in authentication [08:07] but i think there no pub key for lucid [08:12] i had fix it [08:13] http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1053126 [08:13] i hope all of you enjoy it [08:13] and thanks for all [08:13] i have to go now [08:44] okay, apparently the import failed and I've received a Mail about this. How would I change the git location then? [08:45] also, the log doesn't really imply that the location is wrong, but rather that bzr-git isn't able to parse it properly [08:49] sebi`: which import? [08:49] import of a git repository into my project [08:51] sebi`: if you put the url into a browser, you can see it doesn't exist [08:51] sebi`: I can easily update it if you give me the right link [08:51] maxb: hi [08:52] thumper: that#s because github is expecting a git client, not a webbrowser [08:53] the refs url in the logs however works just fine [08:53] and it's the URL from the readonly HTTP git acces, so it *should* work [08:53] access, even [08:54] hmm... [08:55] thumper: you're able to access the refs url, right? [08:55] http://github.com/nebukadnezzar/mars.git/info/refs [08:55] yes that works [08:56] exactly [08:56] sebi`: jelmer should be along shortly, and he wrote bzr-git [08:56] the readonly url is just the repository URL with ".git" appended [08:56] okay [08:56] sebi`: so when you see him, ask away [08:57] I will [08:57] There is a more practical solution - just import over the git protocol. Which should be faster anyway [08:57] might be a try worth [08:57] * maxb edits url [08:58] to git://github.com/nebukadnezzar/mars.git [08:58] thanks in advance, hehe :P [09:00] Right, that works [09:01] Something rather odd is going on that http did not [09:01] nice, yeah that worked [09:01] indeed [09:01] * thumper remembers [09:01] there is a bug with our version of bzr-git right now [09:01] jelmer has landed a fix [09:01] the trunkpage still thinks that there is no repository for mars, though... :( [09:01] to be rolled out at the next release [09:03] ooh nevermind, I forgot to link the branch [09:05] I presume bzr-git will automatically mirror all changes? [09:08] everything on the HEAD branch [09:15] okay [09:48] thank you for setting up more i386 builders! === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta [11:32] Tuxpaint and tuxtype were demoted from main to universe in the Lucid cycle. As a result, the translations are missing, because they were stripped, supposedly to go to langpacks. [11:32] I think LP should somehow force a reupload of the packages being demoted, to prevent that problem. Should I file a bug against LP for this? Or just try to apply for an SRU for the affected packages? [11:35] (Bugs #572994 and #512285) [11:35] Launchpad bug 572994 in tuxpaint (Ubuntu) "Unable to change the language in Tuxpaint (dup-of: 503919)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/572994 [11:35] Launchpad bug 503919 in Baltix "Translations missing in tuxpaint-data Ubuntu 10.04 package (affected: 10, heat: 43)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/503919 [11:35] Launchpad bug 512285 in tuxtype (Ubuntu) "Cannot change language (affected: 1, heat: 20)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/512285 [11:37] Or at least the developers should be notified that each demotion should be accompanied by a dummy version bump? === yofel_ is now known as yofel [11:58] alkisg: What do you mean by 'a reupload'? [11:59] It requires a full rebuild. [11:59] wgrant: my terminology might need improving, I mean that no source code needs to be changed, just a version bump + rebuild [12:01] I filed bug #612909 for soyuz, I hope that was the right thing to do. [12:01] Launchpad bug 612909 in Soyuz "Packages demoted from main to universe lack the translations (affected: 1, heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/612909 [12:03] alkisg, in the meantime, do you think you could file a bug for each of the affected packages in Ubuntu, so that this could be fixed in a Stable Release Upload (SRU)? Here's an example of the same bug for ekiga -> bug 577067 [12:03] Launchpad bug 577067 in Ubuntu Translations "ekiga is in English (not localized / translated) in non-English system (affected: 5, heat: 30)" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/577067 [12:04] dpm, is a separate bug required? (a bug already exist for each of those packages). If so, sure, I'd be glad to. [12:04] (see above for the bug links) [12:04] alkisg, no separate bug needed if there already is one for each of the packages [12:04] Nice. So I should just subscribe ubuntu-sru team? [12:04] * alkisg reads https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates ... [12:06] alkisg, yes, but I'd also reword the bug description to be more in line with the guidelines on that wiki page [12:06] Thank you, will do that now. [12:07] thank you! === mrevell is now known as mrevell-lunch [12:37] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates mentions that I should upload the fixed package to lucid-proposed. Should I really go ahead and do that? (it's pretty safe as no source code is changed, just a version bump). Is it OK that my name will be there in the changelog (unless I somehow upload it unsigned?) [12:37] alkisg: not really the place to ask imo [12:38] alkisg: How else will the package get into the archive? [12:38] (it's a little out of topic now, but since it's just a yes/no question and I already have all the "history" above...) [12:38] shadeslayer: heh I was just writing that [12:38] But yes, #ubuntu-devel or #ubuntu-motu is more appropriate. [12:38] ^ was about to say that :P [12:38] Someone has to upload it to lucid-proposed. It might as well be used. [12:38] Er. [12:38] Be *you*. [12:38] wgrant: it's the first time I'm doing this, sorry for asking simple questions :) [12:38] OK, thanks, /me reads about uploading to -proposed... [12:47] does somebody know if those 290 i386 jobs in the "official" build queue will get build eventually? As I see sometimes all 3 i386 buildds idling while there are still jobs in the queue and new uploads seem to get a higher build priority [12:48] geser: the page has a bug [12:48] they're translations jobs that should be in the PPA queue [12:48] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/soyuz/+bug/609904 [12:48] Launchpad bug 609904 in Soyuz "BuilderSet.getBuildQueueSizes needs to consider virtualized=NULL as false (affected: 1, heat: 19)" [High,Triaged] [12:52] OOPS-1676ED2269 [12:52] https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1676ED2269 === mrevell-lunch is now known as mrevell === matsubara-afk is now known as matsubara === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha === Cepheus|Away is now known as Cepheus [14:22] hi all, I'm trying to work out why I'm not getting email notification from Launchpad. Does anybody know how to tell if email is being sent to a group address? [14:27] I want https://launchpad.net/~codesourcery-linaro-list to recieve merge notifications from https://code.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro and send them to the CS mailing list, but it's not working. Any ideas? [14:29] ams_cs, You probably need to modify the team's subscription [14:29] ams_cs, its probably set up not to send any mail at all right now [14:29] ams_cs, or the mails are getting held up in moderation [14:30] I can't check, because I don't own the group, but I believe lool set it up to do that [14:31] ams_cs, all e-mail sent to that group will be sent to gnu-linaro-tools@codesourcery.com [14:32] cody-somerville: right, but I'm not seeing it, so either it's being swallowed elsewhere, or never sent in the first place [14:33] oh right, you're not a member of the team so you can't see the how the subscription is configured [14:33] you'll have to ping lool [14:33] cody-somerville: yeah, I did that, but he's travelling, and suggested that somebody here would be able to determine the problem [14:40] Any chance I can get a review of this? https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~jailkit/jailkit/debian [14:44] hrm.. [14:45] This one is better :) https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~jailkit/jailkit/trunk [14:51] MTecknology, done [15:07] lifeless: I have an editstatus oops if you want it === fta_ is now known as fta [15:29] jelmer: thanks :D [15:43] how do I get both backports and proposed as dependencies for my PPA? [15:45] mxpxpod: on the PPA home page there should be an edit dependencies for something like that [15:45] micahg: right, but it looks like I can only select proposed or backports [15:45] not both [15:45] mxpxpod: you can't :( [15:46] file a bug about it, it's not too hard to fix [15:48] Does the "backports" option include all of the options above it? [15:49] ams_cs, cody-somerville: I just checked, and the team is sub-ed to "Email about all changes" for "Code review Level", on both branches === fta_ is now known as fta [15:49] ams_cs: I really think you ought to check the mail server on the other side, I can provide you with approximate dates at which they reached my server [15:50] lool: sure, but I don't have access, and the guy who does is unlikely to be out of bed yet, and is overworked anyway [15:51] ams_cs: Still, it's the likely the problem is on this side, since I get emails, and we confirmed the email address of the team [15:51] I can certainly see Launchpad send emails out [15:51] lool: right, and have the same emails in my personal inbox [15:52] lool: it's just the list copy that's missing [15:52] It certainly sounds like a mailing-list manager issue, not a Launchpad issue === salgado is now known as salgado-lunch === deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] [16:16] Isn't estimated wait time for builds supposed to down instead of up? From 6hr to 22hr to 1day seems kinda backward. :P [16:16] It'd be coolk if we could donate resources for building. :) [16:20] MTecknology: builders disappeared again [16:23] micahg: oh, it's sad when that happens [16:35] hi [16:37] i not good english beei [16:37] man [16:54] lifeless: I have another distrotask timeout and I have the oops code, should I update my bug with the neew code? === fta_ is now known as fta === beuno is now known as beuno-lunch === fta_ is now known as fta === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch [17:36] micahg, yep, saw that too, that's sad. i'm now building my stuff on my own hardware as the ppas are no longer reliable. i'll tell the complaining users there's nothing i can do for them anymore and that they should suffer endlessly with agonizing ppas === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === salgado-lunch is now known as salgado [18:11] grr... I built a package in launchpad, it's published - but I can't install it === oubiwann is now known as oubiwann-away === oubiwann-away is now known as oubiwann === fta_ is now known as fta === beuno-lunch is now known as beuno [18:18] and now I see why.. === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta [20:41] is launchpad got a bug in assigning? [20:43] ari-tczew, are you trying to assign a bug to someone other than yourself? [20:43] ari-tczew: no, only bug supervisors can assign to others, or one can assign to onesself [20:44] http://blog.launchpad.net/general/assigning-bugs-to-someone-else-or-not [20:44] deryck, micahg: I want to assign someone else than me [20:45] ari-tczew: you can't do that [20:45] once I could do it. now it doesn't work [20:45] ari-tczew: see the link that deryck posted [20:45] ari-tczew, is this your project on Launchpad? [20:45] deryck: no [20:45] hi micahg. :-) [20:46] hmmm, maybe it's good idea. [20:46] ari-tczew, yeah, so you no longer can do this. See the blog post [20:46] hi deryck :) [20:46] it's prevent bug from newbies [20:47] ari-tczew, plus, you really shouldn't assign a bug to someone to get their attention. You're committing them to work on a bug that they may not be able to work on. [20:47] this is open to abuse [20:47] I myself once did mistakes like assign to latest uploader for merge. I've been didn't familiar with procedures :P [20:47] which is why you fixed it deryck :) [20:47] exactly :-) [20:48] ari-tczew: you shouldn't be assigning to uploaders [20:48] you can subscribe someone if you think they have an interest in the bug [20:48] micahg: it's history!~ [21:47] micahg: yes please [21:48] lifeless: I trusted my gut and filed it :) [21:49] lifeless: BTW, I updated my old bug, and now distrotask seems to be unusable in stable bug 609012 [21:49] Launchpad bug 609012 in Launchpad Bugs "+distrotask timeout (affected: 1, heat: 21)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/609012 [22:12] last time +related-software gives timeout [22:14] lifeless: ^^ [22:15] micahg: hmm? [22:15] ari-tczew: he's on a performance kick at the moment [22:16] micahg: who? [22:16] ari-tczew: lifeless. [22:17] micahg: hi, sorry, morning email blitz [22:17] lifeless: ari-tczew is having a timeout issue with +related-software [22:17] * micahg doesn't know where that belongs [22:18] micahg: ah! you mean about user. I thought that you're commenting situation [22:18] ari-tczew: when you get a timeout [22:18] ari-tczew: please file a bug on https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+filebug and include the OOPS code [22:19] lifeless: when I'm on a user's profil and click on Related software and packages [22:19] what's the OOPS? [22:19] ari-tczew: theres a long story behind this, but doing that gives our process a real thing to hook into and fix [22:19] ari-tczew: it should be in the text of the error page [22:20] lifeless: BTW, I updated my old bug, and now distrotask seems to be unusable in stable bug 609012 <--- from above as well [22:20] Launchpad bug 609012 in Launchpad Bugs "+distrotask timeout (affected: 1, heat: 21)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/609012 [22:20] micahg: for your distrotask thing - you can see stuarts comment, the page needs to be tuned [22:20] lifeless: I know, but I'm adding urgency since stable is currently unusable :) [22:20] micahg: what do you mean by stable ? [22:21] lifeless: lp.net, not edge [22:21] ah [22:21] so, lp.net has a higher timeout limit. And *more timeouts* [22:21] so, if edge doesn't work, its very unlikely lp.net will [22:21] lifeless: well, most things I get working if I disable edge, didn't help for +distrotask [22:22] micahg: I've got graphs for this ;) [22:22] production has about 10 times the timeouts edge does [22:22] lifeless: I believe you, I'm just telling you my experience with using edge primarily [22:22] its also slower - compare https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug vs https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug :) [22:23] micahg: sure, I appreciate that. [22:23] ari-tczew: could you take a screen shot of the error page you get ? [22:23] lifeless: no problem, give me 5 minutes [22:23] ari-tczew: I know LP is slow, sorry! :P [22:24] lifeless: any performance improvents with next week's rollout? [22:24] lifeless: haha, I mean that I need to finish something :P [22:24] micahg: yeah [22:24] that's good [22:24] micahg: in particular filebug [22:24] yeah, that's a nasty one for people because back doesn't work as opposed to +distrotask [22:24] micahg: which has been my pet project, but I've seen other timeout fixes go through [22:25] I was trying to keep an eye on fixes for a while, but I don't have time anymore, I just scan the titles for stuff that affects me now [22:29] heh, yeah - and I hope we'll make it harder still (by doing more stuff :)) === matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk [22:39] who do I hassle to get private branches on my fancy $$PAID$$ LP Project? [22:39] I think any losa can do that, though I'm not totally sure. [22:40] bac: I know you've handed this off - but can you confirm process : once the project has a voucher, losas can do the rest ? [22:40] any way I can easily tell who;s a losa? [22:41] lifeless: that should be the case. it's really better to ask mrevell or me, instead of a losa [22:41] josh_k: what project ? [22:41] bac: thanks! https://edge.launchpad.net/project-0823 [22:45] lifeless: where you would see uploaded screenshot? [22:45] lamont: Around? [22:47] ari-tczew: anywhere you like [22:47] ari-tczew: e.g. http://imagebin.org/ === salgado is now known as salgado-afk [22:49] lifeless: what do you want to see in image? only web browser? [22:49] full desktop items [22:49] just the error page you get [22:52] lifeless: http://imagebin.org/108004 [22:52] ari-tczew: see where it says Error ID: [22:52] ari-tczew: after that is the OOPS code === jenkins is now known as ubuntujenkins === ubuntujenkins is now known as jenkins [22:53] lifeless: it's black magic for me [22:53] in your case it is OOPS-1676D1946 [22:53] https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1676D1946 [22:55] ari-tczew: https://edge.launchpad.net/~bhavi/+related-software may work better, the page has been improved in the next release [22:59] lifeless: when will be next release? [23:00] 12th august [23:01] http://identi.ca/launchpadstatus [23:08] lifeless: so do you propose use edge version? [23:08] ari-tczew: it may work better for you [23:10] lifeless: are you sure that this issue will be fixed in next release? === fta_ is now known as fta [23:13] bac: btw, looks like I'm all private now [23:13] thanks! :) === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-brb [23:14] ari-tczew: no I'm not [23:14] ari-tczew: if you try the edge page and it works then that is a good sign that it may be fixed. [23:14] ok === apachelogger is now known as gnomelogger [23:32] ooo my recipe build might actually build today! [23:34] mwhudson: Have you applied the 2-3x buildd-manager inefficiency factor? [23:34] wgrant: not so specifically [23:34] wgrant: but it said 17 hours 24 hours ago and says 3 hours now [23:35] True. === Ursinha-brb is now known as Ursinha-afk