h00k | ripps: hello | 01:32 |
---|---|---|
mase_wk | hey guys, i have some questions about internationalisation and translation. Specifically regarding gettext utilities. Wiould anyone be able to point me to the most appropriate channel for asking those questions ? | 03:07 |
micahg | mase_wk: #ubuntu-translators? | 03:09 |
mase_wk | ok thanks will try there. | 03:11 |
dholbach | good morning | 07:49 |
mase_wk | morn | 07:54 |
DktrKranz | bdrung, Laney: ubuntu-dev project has been just approved on alioth | 09:00 |
Laney | awesome | 09:01 |
bdrung | DktrKranz: great, i requested to join | 09:41 |
bdrung | DktrKranz: did you request a mailing list? | 09:42 |
DktrKranz | bdrung: I did, I have to configure it properly first, though | 09:59 |
DktrKranz | bdrung, ajmitch: approved :) | 10:19 |
ajmitch | DktrKranz: thanks :) | 10:21 |
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
=== ApOgEE__ is now known as ApOgEE | ||
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
\sh | siretart: I uploaded a fix to the Volumes.pm problem of ian...send you and him an email | 11:03 |
DktrKranz | Laney: done | 11:06 |
Laney | DktrKranz: you are fast! thanks | 11:06 |
DktrKranz | ssssh! :) | 11:07 |
DktrKranz | we've to decide ML title | 11:08 |
Rhonda | DktrKranz! gtg backport! | 11:21 |
sebner | DktrKranz! new gtg release! | 11:31 |
sebner | huhu Rhonda :D | 11:31 |
Rhonda | sebner: pffft :) | 11:32 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
Laney | http://alioth.debian.org/~laney-guest/bug-reporters.txt | 12:05 |
Laney | UDD is fun | 12:05 |
Rhonda | What's that query? | 12:10 |
* geser should file more bugs in the Debian BTS :) | 12:10 | |
Laney | Rhonda: I don't think you want to see it :P | 12:12 |
Laney | but it's in my home-directory on alioth | 12:13 |
Laney | cat ~laney-guest/udd-bugs.pl | 12:13 |
Laney | for some reason it doesn't run right from that script though, so I just generated the resultset from psql directly | 12:13 |
* ajmitch isn't on that list... | 12:14 | |
Laney | ajmitch: It searches for @ubuntu @canonical or origin-ubuntu usertag | 12:14 |
Laney | Rhonda: try ~laney-guest/ubuntu-bts-reporters.txt, that's just the query | 12:15 |
ajmitch | probably because I use @d.o & never use the usertags as I should | 12:15 |
Laney | ajmitch: I don't know how you can be classified as an ubuntu person then | 12:15 |
ajmitch | I can't, but I don't mind that :) | 12:15 |
Laney | indeed | 12:16 |
Laney | it's just a bit of fun anyway. I don't think such metrics are meaningful | 12:16 |
ajmitch | nice to see how short a script it can be done with | 12:17 |
vish | Laney: doing a debian census, are we? :D | 12:17 |
Laney | vish: Just seeing what can be done with UDD | 12:18 |
* vish has double digits count, yay! | 12:18 | |
* ajmitch should file more bugs | 12:21 | |
Rhonda | It's another one of those useless comparisons without enough deeper insight like 16% vs. 1% gnome contribution or 7.2% vs. 2.8% of open bugs with patches. | 12:21 |
Rhonda | I always tried to promote for the Debian (website) translation work to *not* look at the numbers because that's a look for quantity instead of quality … | 12:22 |
ajmitch | but having 600k bugs is good, no? :) | 12:22 |
Rhonda | Unfortunately I regularly have failed to get that point across and people still pride themself with numbers. :/ | 12:22 |
Rhonda | ajmitch: Neither Debian nor Ubuntu has 600k bugs. Or maybe. Again depends of point of view and how to try to lie with statistics. :) | 12:23 |
ajmitch | launchpad karma is a good example of numbers influencing what people do | 12:23 |
Rhonda | Actually, it's also easy to cheat your way into karma without too much work done or even _important_ work done. | 12:24 |
Rhonda | Usually important work takes longer and gives less karma. | 12:24 |
Rhonda | Thanks for yet another nice example for bad number chasing. | 12:24 |
Laney | I can't say I've ever looked at the karma of anyone other than myself, and even then only for curiosity | 12:24 |
ajmitch | Laney: take a look at the karma for someone who touches a lot of blueprints | 12:25 |
Laney | and I doubt that anyone forwards bugs to Debian in order to get up some kind of ranking | 12:25 |
Laney | ajmitch: I know it's there, but does it really influence anything or anyone? | 12:25 |
vish | ajmitch: yeah , some one recently did that before applying for an Ubuntu membership :s | 12:25 |
ajmitch | it does for some people when they're going for membership | 12:25 |
vish | ajmitch: of course they didnt get it ;) | 12:25 |
Laney | I'd hope that the membership boards can see beyond it | 12:25 |
ajmitch | they do | 12:26 |
vish | Laney: they use the karma to quantify work , *if* work is based on lp.. | 12:26 |
vish | but not a necessity. | 12:27 |
Laney | That data I just generated is interesting to see who is active in Debian, but I don't think you could use it to play anyone off against anyone else | 12:28 |
Laney | it's not comparable to the gnome census thing | 12:28 |
ajmitch | interesting to look at though | 12:28 |
vish | Laney: nah , i was just kidding.. :) | 12:29 |
ajmitch | DktrKranz: going to post somewhere about that team? | 12:36 |
=== dholbach_ is now known as dholbach | ||
DktrKranz | Rhonda: gtg backport is an issue, a patch has to be reverted, I asked invernizzi about it | 12:41 |
DktrKranz | sebner: pack it! | 12:41 |
sebner | DktrKranz: release it! | 12:42 |
Rhonda | DktrKranz: Ah, right, remember you mention that before. My bad memory on the one hand and really wanting it on the other hand are fighting each other. :) | 12:45 |
DktrKranz | it's not a trivial change, so I'd like to hear from him before attempting | 12:45 |
DktrKranz | sebner: link link link :D | 12:46 |
jetienne_ | q. any kind enougth to explain dh_usrlocal ? i read the man page but i dont get it. dh_usrlocal is complaining when i do 'debuild -i -us -uc -b' | 12:52 |
jetienne_ | ok ignored it with override_dh_usrlocal ... lets hope it is not dangerous :) | 12:56 |
MTecknology | So.. If I had to fix a broken .dsc file but have all the files, how do I correctly unpack it? Can I use dget after I have the files? | 14:05 |
james_w | dpkg-source -x <whatever>.dsc | 14:05 |
MTecknology | thanks :) | 14:05 |
geser | jetienne: what error did you got? | 14:08 |
Rhonda | If the .dsc file is broken, how should dpkg-source -x work? | 14:10 |
jetienne | geser: about dh_usrlocal ? | 14:10 |
jetienne | dh_usrlocal: debian/neoip-utils/usr/local/lib/neoip-utils/node-neoip.kpf is not a directory <- i got many like this one at the end of "debuild -i -us -uc -b" geser | 14:10 |
geser | jetienne: why do you have files in /usr/local/ in the first place? | 14:11 |
jetienne | geser: because i copy them there... not sure what you mean | 14:11 |
geser | packages shouldn't use /usr/local, it's for the local sysadmin | 14:11 |
jetienne | geser: ok. where should i put files which are script, aka not i386 native | 14:12 |
geser | /usr/share/<pkg> if they are arch-indep and /usr/lib/<pkg> else | 14:13 |
jetienne | geser: thanks it did the job. | 14:15 |
jetienne | unusual-interpreter i got a lot of these too. i guess this is normal | 14:15 |
tumbleweed | which interpreter? | 14:16 |
jetienne | nodejs | 14:16 |
jetienne | script-not-executable those too | 14:16 |
tumbleweed | if that's a binary provided by that package, then that's expected, add an override for the unusual-interpreter | 14:16 |
tumbleweed | if they should be executable, then you need to fix that | 14:17 |
jetienne | tumbleweed: how can i override litian stuff ? | 14:18 |
tumbleweed | jetienne: you only override if you *know* you are right. dh_lintian can install binary package overrides. source package overrides are found as described in the lintian manpage | 14:20 |
jetienne | tumbleweed: hmm ok, well i dunno much | 14:21 |
jetienne | i guess i will live with the warning for now | 14:21 |
geser | what warnings? | 14:21 |
jetienne | embedded-javascript-library extra-license-file readme-debian-contains-debmake-template binary-without-manpage unusual-interpreter. | 14:23 |
jetienne | for only the few firsts :) | 14:23 |
tumbleweed | jetienne: almost all of those need to be fixed, unusual-interpreter was thone I was saying you may need to override eventually | 14:23 |
tumbleweed | (err, not need to, may want to) | 14:24 |
jetienne | tumbleweed: i understand. just a matter of priority | 14:24 |
dpm | LucidFox, hi, I remember reading in your Behind MOTU interview that you live in Russia. I've been looking at a couple of Russian locale bugs, and I wanted to ask you about your opinion on bug 124987. From what I understand, the patch does make sense, but I would like to have confirmation by a Russian speaker before finding someone who could have a look at applying it. | 14:25 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 124987 in langpack-locales (Ubuntu) "Month names in Russian Localization should be in lowercase" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/124987 | 14:25 |
lucas | grold: it would be nice if you asked me before requesting syncs of ruby packages. I don't think that syncing ruby1.9.1 now is particularly useful | 15:13 |
grold | lucas, ok. next time will ask | 15:19 |
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
=== aalex_home is now known as aalex | ||
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
MichealH | Hi, I am intrested to become MOTU. | 16:33 |
micahg | MichealH: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopers | 16:36 |
MichealH | So how would I go about uploading to universe? | 16:38 |
micahg | MichealH: you can't until you become a developer which that link will explain the process | 16:38 |
micahg | MichealH: you can have uploads sponsored if you want | 16:39 |
micahg | MichealH: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopers | 16:39 |
micahg | oops | 16:39 |
micahg | MichealH: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SponsorshipProcess | 16:39 |
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
ara | dholbach, whenever you have time: 613016 :-) | 17:07 |
ara | bug 613016 | 17:07 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 613016 in mtdev (Ubuntu) "libmtdev-dev includes .la library" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/613016 | 17:07 |
ara | thanks ;-) | 17:07 |
funkyHat | I'm debuggin epiphany-browser (LP #611787) and I've found that it's looking for /usr/lib/libgirepository-1.0.so.0, but only /usr/lib/libgirepository-1.0.so.1 is there. it works fine if I symlink the new version to the old version though | 17:09 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 611787 in epiphany-browser (Ubuntu) "epiphany-browser: error while loading shared libraries: libgirepository-1.0.so.0: cannot open shared object file" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/611787 | 17:09 |
funkyHat | What would be the best way to tell epiphany to use the new version? | 17:09 |
dholbach | ara: isn't time relative | 17:10 |
Bachstelze | funkyHat: you can't AFAIK, epiphany needs to be recompiled with the new version | 17:10 |
ara | dholbach, hehehe, I can imagine | 17:10 |
funkyHat | Bachstelze: yes I know, I've recompiled it and the error still occurs | 17:11 |
dholbach | ara: a branch is enough, no need to file a bug | 17:11 |
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
Riddell | anyone heard of Ubuntu Tweak? | 17:17 |
Riddell | do we want it in the archive? | 17:17 |
bdrung | Riddell: heard of it. | 17:19 |
Riddell | bdrung: heard good things or bad things? :) | 17:20 |
tumbleweed | apparently it isn't as bad as the (horrific) predecesors, no idea about code quality, though | 17:20 |
bdrung | Riddell: no bad things yet. | 17:20 |
bdrung | but we should look at the code to check if it's sane | 17:21 |
Riddell | apps which tweak the settings of other apps just seem like a bad idea, if the original app can't do it there's probably a good reason | 17:22 |
tumbleweed | OTOH, if one of these things can be blessed, it'd make people less likely to destroy their machines | 17:22 |
cody-somerville | wow. | 17:23 |
bdrung | Riddell: then gconf-editor should be removed? | 17:23 |
Riddell | that's a different sort of UI | 17:24 |
Laney | I suggest, relating to the ongoing thread, generalising (debranding/customising the branding) and maintianing it in Debian if you wish to do so :) | 17:27 |
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
Riddell | Laney: are you talking about Ubuntu Tweak? | 17:52 |
Riddell | cody-somerville: are you wowing at Ubuntu Tweak? | 17:52 |
cody-somerville | no | 17:53 |
cody-somerville | http://doctormo.org/2010/08/03/is-this-acceptable/ | 17:53 |
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
Laney | Riddell: right | 18:06 |
Laney | I didn't actually look at what it does | 18:06 |
Riddell | Laney: well it's in New and somehow I need to decide if I should accept it or no | 18:07 |
Laney | oh | 18:07 |
Laney | I can't even figure out its website | 18:11 |
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
LucidFox | Riddell, regarding ubuntu-tweak in NEW, my personal gut impulse would be "ugh, hackish way to do ugly things" | 18:49 |
LucidFox | But well... it passed REVU then, I presume? | 18:49 |
Riddell | apachelogger: see, I'm not alone :) | 18:50 |
Riddell | LucidFox: I've no idea if it passed revu | 18:50 |
Laney | automatix had fans :) | 18:50 |
Riddell | that was the one I'd been trying to remember the name of | 18:50 |
LucidFox | Automatix also had gaping security issues | 18:50 |
apachelogger | Riddell: well, I dunno how ubuntu tweak does things but we had a similar tool in KDE 3 times | 18:50 |
apachelogger | there are settings that are just to marginal to justify being visible in the GUI | 18:51 |
Laney | LucidFox: yes, indeed, that was kind of my point | 18:51 |
Riddell | apachelogger: we did? | 18:51 |
apachelogger | yep | 18:51 |
LucidFox | ubuntu-tweak is in REVU's "needs review", with 0 comments | 18:51 |
* apachelogger packaged it :P | 18:51 | |
Riddell | apachelogger: what was that? | 18:51 |
apachelogger | gotta look | 18:51 |
Riddell | LucidFox: hmm maybe I should reject it on grounds it hasn't passed revu | 18:52 |
apachelogger | Riddell: https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kde-tweak | 18:52 |
Laney | Riddell: I'm sure you can find a policy violation in there | 18:52 |
Laney | does it modify files in /etc, for example? | 18:53 |
apachelogger | Riddell: REVU is not obligatory IIRC, neither is getting two MOTU acks | 18:53 |
Laney | indeed it isn't | 18:53 |
devfil | it should... | 18:55 |
devfil | (IMHO) | 18:55 |
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
ari-tczew | didrocks: ping | 20:30 |
ari-tczew | didrocks: you didn't upload my patch in gegl | 20:35 |
didrocks | ari-tczew: hum? really? | 21:27 |
didrocks | ari-tczew: I had to go to the city center, just see a rejection, let me check | 21:28 |
didrocks | ari-tczew: ok, let me fix this | 21:28 |
Laney | didrocks: are you aware of the sqlite3 3.7.0 performance problems? | 21:28 |
ajmitch | morning | 21:28 |
Laney | hi ajmitch | 21:28 |
didrocks | Laney: no, I'm not very found of sqlite to be honest, why? ;) | 21:29 |
Laney | didrocks: it ruins banshee :) | 21:29 |
Laney | or :( | 21:29 |
* ajmitch WTB more RAM, this computer seems to be running out of swap :) | 21:29 | |
didrocks | Laney: urgh :/ | 21:29 |
didrocks | Laney: is there a particular issue with that sqlite version? do you think we should move to another one for maverick? | 21:30 |
Laney | didrocks: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=625783 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/612370 | 21:30 |
didrocks | ari-tczew: should be good now | 21:30 |
ubottu | Gnome bug 625783 in general "Banshee becomes extremely slow after sqlite3 3.6.23.1 => 3.7.0 upgrade" [Major,New] | 21:30 |
Laney | I think you should somehow track it for the release | 21:30 |
didrocks | Laney: yeah, I'm subscribing to it | 21:30 |
Laney | milestone for the beta possibly | 21:30 |
didrocks | Laney: do not hesitate to ping me if you get some news | 21:30 |
Laney | I mailed upstream, but you should be aware of it | 21:30 |
didrocks | Laney: I'll discuss it in next week meeting | 21:30 |
didrocks | Laney: thanks a lot for the notice! | 21:30 |
Laney | nps | 21:31 |
didrocks | ari-tczew: ok, the issue comes from a different tar.gz file, do you have some time to make a debdiff against the ubuntu version rather than the debian one, please? | 21:42 |
didrocks | ari-tczew: if not, I'll recreate it manually, but it will rock if you can handle that | 21:42 |
ari-tczew | didrocks: Done. Please upload it when you came back from city. | 22:09 |
ari-tczew | bdrung: how did you fix ~90 bugs in maverick? | 22:16 |
didrocks | ari-tczew: sponsored, thanks a lot! | 22:26 |
ari-tczew | didrocks: no problem, I propose cooperate more in future :> | 22:27 |
didrocks | ari-tczew: great! looking forward to it :) | 22:28 |
ari-tczew | didrocks: are you main sponsors also, right? | 22:28 |
didrocks | ari-tczew: yeah, if you need sponsorship, do not hesitate (I don't look at the list often as I'm quite overloaded with work, but if you ping me, it's ok :)) | 22:29 |
ari-tczew | didrocks: sounds great! | 22:29 |
ari-tczew | didrocks: now I got 2 merges remaining in sponsors-queue for main. are you interested? | 22:34 |
didrocks | ari-tczew: sure fire away | 22:34 |
didrocks | ari-tczew: will probably upload them after A3 though | 22:34 |
ari-tczew | one fixes CVE.. :) | 22:34 |
ari-tczew | didrocks: alpha3? | 22:34 |
didrocks | ari-tczew: and it's more than 23:30 here, will go to bed soon :) | 22:34 |
didrocks | ari-tczew: right, alpha3 | 22:35 |
ari-tczew | didrocks: okay okay, how can I inform you? | 22:35 |
didrocks | ari-tczew: just subscribe me to both bugs | 22:36 |
didrocks | I'll unsubscribe if it's not my area :) | 22:36 |
ari-tczew | didrocks: area? | 22:36 |
didrocks | ari-tczew: like kde package and such like X ones, plumbing…, I don't really work on them and prefer people who are aware of them sponsoring | 22:38 |
ari-tczew | didrocks: hmm, ok, will try :) | 22:39 |
=== jenkins is now known as ubuntujenkins | ||
=== ubuntujenkins is now known as jenkins | ||
ari-tczew | didrocks: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gegl/0.0.22-2ubuntu1/+build/1902830 why? it built fine on my pbuilder | 22:54 |
ari-tczew | could someone look at this? ^^ | 22:54 |
bdrung | ari-tczew: did i? from where do you have the number? | 22:55 |
ari-tczew | bdrung: bdrung@ubuntu.com has 88 fixes > http://qa.ubuntu.com/reports/bug-fixing/maverick-fixes-report.html | 22:56 |
geser | ari-tczew: simple, libopenraw-dev is in universe while gegl (the source package) is in main | 22:56 |
ari-tczew | geser: so do I need to drop all B-D which are in universe? | 22:57 |
bdrung | ari-tczew: probably due to vlc | 22:57 |
bdrung | and some from eclipse | 22:57 |
ari-tczew | aha | 22:58 |
bdrung | ari-tczew: look at the changelog of vlc | 22:59 |
bdrung | :) | 22:59 |
geser | ari-tczew: yes, that's one solution (if it works) the other is to get libopenraw promoted to main (-> MIR) (and of course all of it's build-dependencies too if they aren't already in main) | 22:59 |
ari-tczew | geser: I think that easier is try to 1st solution ^^ | 23:00 |
geser | that's also often the preferred one | 23:01 |
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
ari-tczew | geser: can I check easy whether B-D are good for package? | 23:14 |
ari-tczew | is it any tool for checking component? | 23:14 |
tumbleweed | ari-tczew: test in a main-only pbuilder? | 23:14 |
ari-tczew | tumbleweed: and what now? do I need to knock around my pbuilder for one test build? | 23:15 |
geser | ari-tczew: I don't know of any. I usually try to look at the component when apt downloads the build dependencies in my pbuilder | 23:16 |
tumbleweed | ari-tczew: what geser says sounds easy enough | 23:16 |
tumbleweed | but it's simple enough to hack your .pbuilderrc to allow variants (or add a hook that reads an environment variable and updates sources.list appropritately) | 23:17 |
ari-tczew | tumbleweed: do you have it done? | 23:18 |
tumbleweed | ari-tczew: you don't want to see my pubilder config :) | 23:19 |
=== apachelogger is now known as gnomelogger | ||
ari-tczew | tumbleweed: why? | 23:20 |
tumbleweed | ari-tczew: also, no I haven't. I implemented variants, and then decided that that was stupid | 23:20 |
ari-tczew | tumbleweed: do you ashamed due to your pbuilder config? | 23:21 |
tumbleweed | ari-tczew: naah, it's just complex: http://paste.debian.net/82178/ | 23:22 |
tumbleweed | err, that's not th eright one | 23:23 |
tumbleweed | oh no it is | 23:23 |
ari-tczew | tumbleweed: I'm too tired for reading this. | 23:24 |
* ajmitch just does it the lazy way & has a few separate configs | 23:25 | |
tumbleweed | ajmitch: I had that, but then I found myself wondering why things aren't doing what I expect | 23:26 |
ajmitch | given how little they differ I should probably roll them up into a single config | 23:27 |
tumbleweed | bdrung: you asked about unseeded vs universe on th esponsor queue: there are a bunch of unseeded branches that are main, and bug #221363 is listed as an unseeded bug | 23:28 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 221363 in policykit-1 (Ubuntu) "Policy Kit Unlock Buttons Greyed Out when using NX / VNC / LTSP" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/221363 | 23:28 |
ajmitch | tumbleweed: that does look to be in universe for lucid | 23:29 |
ajmitch | (policykit), that is | 23:30 |
tumbleweed | ajmitch: the bug is not target at lucid though? | 23:30 |
ajmitch | no | 23:30 |
bdrung | tumbleweed: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/policykit | 23:30 |
ajmitch | but the bug has multiple bug tasks | 23:30 |
ajmitch | policykit-1 is in main, policykit in universe | 23:30 |
ari-tczew | jdong: holidays? | 23:31 |
ajmitch | sponsoring page may only be looking at the last task listed | 23:31 |
tumbleweed | bdrung: oh, I was looking at the hover text on the policykit line in the bug | 23:31 |
tumbleweed | it must have been demoted after upload | 23:31 |
bdrung | who worked on the sponsors queue? we are down 139 (from ~190 yesterday) | 23:32 |
geser | bdrung: someone is "stealing" you work? :) | 23:33 |
* tumbleweed has been hitting it a little | 23:33 | |
tumbleweed | but not that much | 23:33 |
bdrung | geser: no. i just want to say: thank you | 23:33 |
* ajmitch hasn't been stealing any work there | 23:33 | |
bdrung | main: 132 -> 110, universe: 49 -> 28 | 23:34 |
* ajmitch is going to try & focus on doing some work in debian for awhile | 23:35 | |
bdrung | geser: when i work on the queue, i just keep it at the same level. i sponsor five requests and in this time five new ones are added :) | 23:35 |
* tumbleweed needs to do that too. I got distracted from debian after getting MOTU rights | 23:35 | |
ajmitch | bdrung: we can let it creep up to ~50 or so if you prefer? | 23:35 |
bdrung | ajmitch: but only with sync requests. ;) (sponsor-patch is not ready yet) | 23:36 |
ari-tczew | dholbach does a lot of sponsoring | 23:36 |
highvoltage | tumbleweed: I guess that happens :) | 23:36 |
ajmitch | bdrung: sync requests are relatively easy though | 23:37 |
bdrung | ajmitch: yes, that one reason why i process them first | 23:37 |
tumbleweed | highvoltage: but by sponsoring, I'm helping people improve their development skills, but not applying myself to make debian/ubuntu better | 23:37 |
ari-tczew | I'd help in clean sponsors queue. | 23:37 |
highvoltage | "jonathan@ubuntu.com has 1 fix" that's so sad :( | 23:38 |
ari-tczew | highvoltage: it's you? | 23:38 |
* ajmitch is currently raging at python-setuptools being unhelpful, it's not conducive to getting things sponsored | 23:38 | |
highvoltage | tumbleweed: helping others getting better at contributing is big! | 23:39 |
highvoltage | ari-tczew: yep, I guess that will get better over the next few weeks at least | 23:39 |
tumbleweed | highvoltage: yes, but it means I'm not working on some big jobs that I should be working on | 23:39 |
ajmitch | highvoltage: you've got some time to do some bugfixing now? | 23:39 |
bdrung | tumbleweed: you will improve debian/ubuntu in the long run, because the contributor will become motu one day | 23:40 |
tumbleweed | bdrung: yes, I do enjoy it. | 23:40 |
tumbleweed | ajmitch: jonathan=highvoltage, yes, he got in early :) | 23:41 |
ajmitch | tumbleweed: I know highvoltage from long ago :) | 23:41 |
highvoltage | ajmitch: it will be some bugs in ltsp and edubuntu that I planned to work on over the next few weeks anyway :) | 23:41 |
tumbleweed | highvoltage: that bug I mentioned (#221363) is ltsp-related (and I'm dropping it off the sponsor queue because it's only a patch) | 23:42 |
highvoltage | tumbleweed also knows me from long ago :) (well, and recently :)) | 23:42 |
tumbleweed | ajmitch: sorry, meant ari-tczew | 23:42 |
* ajmitch feels old | 23:44 | |
tumbleweed | highvoltage: back then we all thought you were crazy, using this silly ubuntu distribution... :) | 23:45 |
ajmitch | you don't think he's crazy enough now? :) | 23:46 |
tumbleweed | ajmitch: it's nice on latops :P | 23:47 |
highvoltage | s/laptops/devices with wi-fi/g :) | 23:47 |
highvoltage | actually waking up from suspend is a *lot* faster on maverick (almost instant) on my hardware so someone have been doing real good work somewhere | 23:48 |
ajmitch | I may have to upgrade then | 23:48 |
ajmitch | since I've had the problem of often having resume take a long time | 23:48 |
tumbleweed | suspend is semi-broken for me atm. Must find out what the issue is... | 23:49 |
ari-tczew | some guy has uploaded a package to REVU, but now he is offline since 20th June. I'd to upload updated package. can I do it? | 23:49 |
micahg | ari-tczew: have you tried contacting the user through LP? | 23:50 |
highvoltage | ari-tczew: revu isn't a strict requirement for sponsoring a package, so if it's in good shape I guess you can make that judgement call | 23:50 |
ari-tczew | micahg: I picked his e-mail adress from LP and sent message by Evolution. | 23:51 |
micahg | ari-tczew: k, and no response? | 23:51 |
ari-tczew | micahg: no response | 23:51 |
ari-tczew | his karma on launchpad says that he has been active last 20th June | 23:52 |
ajmitch | possibly on holiday for awhile | 23:52 |
ari-tczew | ajmitch: fine, but I want to get this package before FFe | 23:52 |
micahg | ari-tczew: yeah, so I guess like highvoltage said, you could take it over, but I'd try to give the user credit for whatever was done previously | 23:52 |
ari-tczew | can someone main sponsors take this one? bug 613234 | 23:53 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 613234 in gegl (Ubuntu) "FTBFS gegl 0.0.22-2ubuntu1" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/613234 | 23:53 |
Laney | I appreciate your comments and agree the idea is way past its best. But how else can a newspaper with a plummeting circulation get people to buy the paper?! | 23:54 |
Laney | I appreciate your comments and agree the idea is way past its best. But how else can a newspaper with a plummeting circulation get people to buy the paper?! | 23:54 |
Laney | oops | 23:54 |
Laney | middle click...... | 23:54 |
ajmitch | 'oops' indeed | 23:54 |
micahg | lol | 23:54 |
Laney | at least it wasn't obscene! | 23:54 |
* Laney blames legacy X11 features | 23:54 | |
ajmitch | at least you didn't past a password! | 23:54 |
Laney | maybe I did… | 23:55 |
ajmitch | that would be a passphrase | 23:55 |
Laney | pedants, in MY #ubuntu-motu‽ | 23:55 |
ajmitch | never | 23:56 |
* ajmitch hopes that debian NEW isn't moving too slowly at the moment | 23:56 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!