[00:46] chrisccoulson_: looks like we'll be pushing TB 3.1.2 into maverick at the end of the week [00:46] micahg - yeah, just saw the mail too ;) [00:47] chrisccoulson_: I'm wondering, should I wait until Sat night to upload so I can watch for regressions? [00:47] or right after CDs are final on Thursday? [00:47] it doesn't matter too much really, as long as one of us is around after uploading it [00:48] we can upload it as soon as a3 is released though [00:48] chrisccoulson_: k, was just worried about Fri night/Sat as that's when it'll probably hit the mirrors [00:49] chrisccoulson_: since we have to backport thunderbird-locales, I"m not going to modify the packaging from the Lucid version aside from updating to comm-1.9.2 locales [00:49] yeah, that sounds ok [00:49] chrisccoulson_: as for enigmail, I plan on merging from Debian to pick up their packaging fixes and then updating to 1.1.2 (TB31 support) [00:50] what sort of packaging changes are there? [00:51] chrisccoulson_: idk, I haven't looked yet, if they're ominous, I'll leave them out or run it by you [00:51] chrisccoulson_: I just know they had 4 revisions on top of ours [00:51] i suspect it will probably just be ok to use [00:53] i'll probably convert the FF4.0 dailies in to all-in-one build sometime tomorrow, and turn on the crash reporter [00:53] i chatted with ted on IRC earlier, and he's quite keen for us to do that [00:53] chrisccoulson_: awesome, that leaves me free this weekend to make PPAs :) [00:54] chrisccoulson_: tedg? [00:54] chrisccoulson_: don't forget yasm in the build-dep, that should help with WebM [00:54] micahg - ted mielczarek [00:55] (i think that's how you spell it) [00:55] chrisccoulson_: oh, upstream ted :) [00:55] i think we'll only switch on the crash reporter for maverick (and maybe lucid) for the dailies, else we'll end up sending several GB of crash symbols every day [00:56] chrisccoulson_: sounds good, if that works and they want more, we can always do more [00:58] * micahg needs to run home, tty in the morning [00:59] ok, thanks! [09:57] jdstrand, mdeslaur-afk: bug 612109 needed for lucid [09:57] Launchpad bug 612109 in chromium-browser (Ubuntu) "new upstream release: 5.0.375.125~r53311 (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/612109 === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta [11:21] !test [11:21] hrm? === asac_ is now known as asac === yofel_ is now known as yofel [12:49] BUGabundo_remote, hi, do you remember when the codecs stopped working? [12:50] stupid lp removes the debs far too early to be useful to bisect anything :( [12:54] fta: you used to bring up the removed packages in PPA [12:54] be able to bring [12:54] it's no longer possible [12:54] oh well damn [12:55] months ago, they decided it was too big [12:56] but now, it's useless [12:57] it was handy to have [13:07] fta: it still happens [13:07] I have all packages here [13:07] 8,5GB [13:19] asac - do you know what abrowser_run_mozilla.patch is meant to do? it doesn't seem to do much with the way that we start the browser from the wrapper script [13:25] chrisccoulson: can you paste the patch? [13:25] asac - http://paste.ubuntu.com/472635/ [13:26] chrisccoulson: did i commit that? [13:26] asac - i think so, it's been there quite a long time though [13:26] feels more like something fta'ish :) (blind guessing) [13:27] asac - ok, i'm just trying to look at the way the whole startup script/alternative branding works atm, and this patch seemed a little redundant [13:27] nope, not mine [13:27] bzr blame it [13:28] heh, "491 asac@ub..." [13:28] i've never used bzr blame before! [13:31] chrisccoulson: ffox branch? [13:32] asac - this one: lp:firefox/3.6 [13:33] chrisccoulson: debian/firefox.sh.in: [13:33] sets CMDNAME_USER [13:33] asac - yeah, i can see that bit. but i'm still not sure what it actually does [13:35] chrisccoulson: i think its there to fix MOZ_DEFAULT_NAME for abrowser [13:38] asac - firefox.sh always calls $LIBDIR/firefox though, so MOZ_DEFAULT_NAME is always the same value (whether you start abrowser or not) [13:39] unless i've misunderstood something ;) [14:19] fta: thanks. do you have a lucid package available somewhere? [14:59] jdstrand, http://people.ubuntu.com/~fta/chromium/5.0.375.125~r53311-0ubuntu0.10.04.1/ [15:01] fta: thanks [15:09] fta: any progress on the codec breakage? [15:11] BUGabundo_remote, no, i don't have the older debs [15:11] BUGabundo_remote, if you want to help, could you please identify a window for the regression? [15:12] i'm not sure it's the codec package, it may be chromium itself [15:21] fta: Sunday [15:21] let me know if you need any deb === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === e-jat is now known as ejat === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta [20:24] micahg, wrt my pysnmp fix, the other day, you told me to subscribe sru, right? [20:24] fta: and upload to lucid-proposed [20:24] why sru? [20:24] ubuntu-sru [20:25] it's already subscribed [20:25] bug 610570 [20:25] Launchpad bug 610570 in python-pysnmp4 (Ubuntu Lucid) (and 1 other project) "python deprecation warnings for md5 and sha (affects: 2) (heat: 16)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/610570 [20:25] ah, it's uploaded, good [20:25] no, see the last comment [20:26] fta: Riddell must not be familiar with new SRU policy :) [20:27] i'm not either [20:27] fta: try moving the test case to the description [20:28] fta: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2010-July/030999.html [20:40] bug 612879 [20:40] Launchpad bug 612879 in chromium-browser (Ubuntu) "Repo is not getting updated (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/612879 [20:40] *sigh* [20:43] fta: I wasn't sure what teh user meant about that [21:12] i can't use lp anymore, everything i do times out :( [21:13] fta: are you on edge? [21:26] chrisccoulson_: did you accidentally set the wrong task on bug 613049, I'm just wondering if there's a new bug in malone [21:26] Launchpad bug 613049 in firefox (Ubuntu Maverick) (and 1 other project) "Default website link in Maverick firefox is invalid (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/613049 [21:28] micahg - no, it was me working around another bug in launchpad that gives me more priviliges than i really have ;) [21:28] i can target bugs in universe to a particular release, but not packages in main [21:29] but if i remove the package assignment, then i can target the bug ;) [21:29] which is cheating [21:29] so you targetted an empty task [21:29] micahg - yeah, then reassign it back to firefox again ;) [21:29] cool, that's good to know :) [21:29] in theory, this should just work, because i can already upload the package [21:30] but it doesnt, so i cheat a little (although i shouldn't be doing that really) [21:31] heh, ok, just got the second email (which is really the first thing you did) [21:31] chrisccoulson_: yeah, just apply for core-dev ;) [21:32] micahg - yeah, i keep meaning to apply at some point [21:45] yeah, another chrome hannel :P http://blog.chromium.org/2010/08/google-chrome-in-coal-mine.html [21:45] channel [21:47] fta: isn't that just their version of a daily build? [21:48] micahg, nope, it's between -dev and daily [21:49] fta: oh, fun [21:49] they want to release faster, so they need the dev->beta->stable to be shorter [21:49] more release means even more work for us [21:50] yes, a new major release every 6 weeks, plus additional security/major bug fixing [21:50] http://blog.chromium.org/2010/07/release-early-release-often.html [21:50] jdstrand, ^^ [21:50] fta: yeah, I saw that and mentioned it to seb128 earlier [21:51] fta: I was hoping it meant less frequent miinor releases, but they told me that wasn't the case [22:05] fta: builders are back and i386 queue is almost done (5 hrs) === fta_ is now known as fta