| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| * ScottK decides to hit "save as draft" instead of publish to his blog post about the notion that planet.ubuntu.com should be multilingual. | 02:20 | |
| ajmitch | slightly inflammatory? | 02:22 |
|---|---|---|
| ScottK | Yes and the comments of the outraged are entirely predictable. | 02:25 |
| ScottK | Clearly from my position of priviledge I can't understand the perspective of the downtrodden, so it will have to be explained to me. | 02:29 |
| === mase_wk is now known as WizzardOfOz | ||
| === WizzardOfOz is now known as mase_wk | ||
| === jdong_ is now known as jdong | ||
| dholbach | good morning! | 06:42 |
| dholbach | Packaging Training Session: Fixing Small Ubuntu Bugs in 18 minutes in #ubuntu-classroom | 06:42 |
| micahg | zul: do you mind if I merge request-tracker3.8? | 06:46 |
| * ajmitch is watching #u-classroom, honest | 07:10 | |
| === mdeslaur-afk is now known as mdeslaur | ||
| === ara_ is now known as ara | ||
| sbronsted | wgrant: How often is http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/ftbfs/ updated? | 08:04 |
| wgrant | sbronsted: Once an hour. | 08:10 |
| * micahg can't wait for sparc to go away, that page will be much smaller :) | 08:11 | |
| sbronsted | wgrant: But when I build eg httpcomponents-core locally I don't get an error !? | 08:13 |
| jpds | micahg: So will the archive. | 08:13 |
| geser | sbronsted: the packages don't get automatically retried (except DEPWAIT) and the page only shows the current state | 08:14 |
| dholbach | TheMuso: can you extend my membership in ubuntu-universe-sponsors so I can keep running the script that auto-assigns u-u-s bugs to ubuntu-sponsors? | 08:14 |
| sbronsted | wgrant: and when I look a the error log in launchpad it is from the 2010-06-15 !? | 08:14 |
| ajmitch | sbronsted: that log does mention that it's executing maven in offline mode, so it may only have issues when unable to fetch stuff from the internet | 08:15 |
| ajmitch | the buildds have no internet access at all, so builds must be self-contained | 08:15 |
| * ajmitch doesn't know enough about it to know if that error is the cause of it, but it's the most likely | 08:16 | |
| sbronsted | but I will expect the build script always build offline (I hope) | 08:16 |
| ajmitch | given that it's only had one debian upload, and it's arch: all, it's something that's easily missed | 08:18 |
| ajmitch | you may find answers in #ubuntu-java | 08:20 |
| wgrant | sbronsted: We don't retry every build failure every day. | 08:21 |
| geser | given that it doesn't appear anymore in the recent archive rebuild anymore, I give it back to a retry | 08:21 |
| geser | let's see what happens | 08:21 |
| * ajmitch would expect the same sort of result tbh | 08:23 | |
| ajmitch | and launchpad explodes in a ball of flame | 08:23 |
| sbronsted | wgrant: so how do know which of the build errors still are still valid? | 08:25 |
| sbronsted | sorry: ....still are valid | 08:25 |
| wgrant | sbronsted: That page can't tell you that. | 08:25 |
| wgrant | Launchpad doesn't know. | 08:25 |
| geser | sbronsted: check if the package builds now and request a give-back if it does. All the page show is the current state in the archive (that a package didn't got build when it got tried) | 08:27 |
| sbronsted | geser: you mention "recent archive rebuild". How do I see that? | 08:32 |
| geser | sbronsted: the results are here: http://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/ubuntu_ftbfs.cgi | 08:38 |
| geser | ajmitch: "Successfully built on rothera (i386)" for httpcomponents-core and LP still seems to be there :) | 08:46 |
| sbronsted | geser: the httpcomponent-core build is okay now | 08:47 |
| geser | sbronsted: yes, it should vanish from http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ on the next update of that page | 08:48 |
| chilicuil | Laney: I'm trying to build several chroots systems for pbuilder I've modified my .pbuilderrc ( http://pastebin.com/DFg1Ry0S ) so results can be placed in a different directory, then I've run pbuilder-dist and it seems like it doesnt read that file, which file should I change instaed (I've already tried with the $VARS available, but they're not enough)? | 08:50 |
| ajmitch | geser: OK, I was wrong :) | 08:51 |
| === CieD is now known as Ciemon | ||
| ajmitch | geser: LP exploding was it telling me that it was unable to contact a server | 08:51 |
| ajmitch | which went away on page refresh | 08:51 |
| lifeless | ajmitch: did you get an oops ? | 08:52 |
| ajmitch | no OOPS | 08:52 |
| ajmitch | otherwise I'd have something useful to tell you | 08:52 |
| ajmitch | this was on edge, btw | 08:52 |
| wgrant | When was that? | 08:52 |
| lifeless | did you grab a picture ? | 08:52 |
| wgrant | That's meant to be fixed. | 08:52 |
| ajmitch | lifeless: no I didn't, it was afaik a standard "sorry, please try again" sort of message, 30 minutes ago now | 08:53 |
| wgrant | Damn. | 08:53 |
| ajmitch | sorry | 08:53 |
| wgrant | It must have regressed. | 08:53 |
| wgrant | But I don't see how. | 08:54 |
| lifeless | edge upgrade perhaps | 08:54 |
| wgrant | Possibly, true. | 08:54 |
| lifeless | wgrant: were you on edge? | 08:54 |
| wgrant | It wasn't me. | 08:54 |
| ajmitch | doesn't that message come up when there's no appserver to talk to, however briefly? | 08:54 |
| lifeless | bah | 08:54 |
| lifeless | ajmitch: & | 08:54 |
| ajmitch | sorry that I didn't get info from it, if it happens again I'll grab a screenshot at least | 08:55 |
| lifeless | ajmitch: we have dozens of appservers | 08:56 |
| lifeless | ajmitch: so its not meant to happen at all | 08:56 |
| huats | mornig | 09:37 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| TheMuso | dholbach_: If nobody else has done it by now, sure I'll take care of it. | 12:55 |
| TheMuso | dholbach_: done | 12:57 |
| dupondje | https://merges.ubuntu.com/universe.html | 13:30 |
| dupondje | houston we have an issue ! | 13:30 |
| dupondje | :) | 13:30 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| dholbach_ | TheMuso: thanks | 14:12 |
| === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| Riddell | dholbach, jpds, nhandler: anyone from motu council want to weigh in on the ubuntu-tweak question? | 15:15 |
| dholbach | Riddell: the MOTU Council is not around any more - I don't have any opinion on it | 15:17 |
| Riddell | dholbach: shouldn't https://edge.launchpad.net/~motu-council be updated then? | 15:18 |
| dholbach | Riddell: yeah, thanks | 15:18 |
| ScottK | Riddell: Such questions should go to the TB now. | 15:34 |
| micahg | zul: do you mind if I merge request-tracker3.8? | 16:01 |
| zul | micahg: no go ahead | 16:01 |
| micahg | zul: thanks | 16:01 |
| === nigelbabu is now known as nigelb | ||
| shadeslayer | hi.. https://merges.ubuntu.com/ seems to be down, any particular reason? | 17:46 |
| shadeslayer | ( opening anything gives me a 500 error ) | 17:47 |
| fabrice_sp | bdrung, about bug 623870 | 18:34 |
| ubottu | Error: Could not parse data returned by Launchpad: 623870 (https://launchpad.net/bugs/623870) | 18:34 |
| fabrice_sp | bug 613870 | 18:34 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 613870 in gambas2 (Ubuntu) "Please sync gambas2 2.21.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)." [Wishlist,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/613870 | 18:34 |
| fabrice_sp | I was working on it (assigned to me) | 18:35 |
| fabrice_sp | perhaps, the first of ack-sync should be unassign sponsors and assign yourself | 18:36 |
| fabrice_sp | +step | 18:36 |
| fabrice_sp | I assume you are looking at 613891, so I'll stop looking at the sponsoriship queue | 18:37 |
| shadeslayer | would it be a good idea to get a new package in maverick into lucid backports? | 18:42 |
| shadeslayer | ( qoauth to be specific ) | 18:43 |
| micahg | shadeslayer: if people need it in Lucid and it doesn't have a lot of deps, you can request it | 18:44 |
| shadeslayer | ok.. ill just check the deps once | 18:44 |
| ari-tczew | didrocks: ping | 18:44 |
| ari-tczew | didrocks: how do you upload debdiffs? why my patches are signed to Bhavani Shankar? I don't understand this situation. bug 595499 | 18:46 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 595499 in gnu-efi (Ubuntu) "Please merge gnu-efi 3.0i-3(main) from debian unstable(main)" [Wishlist,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/595499 | 18:46 |
| shadeslayer | micahg: seems to have minimal deps : Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7.0.50~), libqca2-dev, qt4-qmake, libqca2-plugin-ossl | 18:47 |
| micahg | shadeslayer: looks good :) | 18:48 |
| shadeslayer | micahg: is there a script of sorts to do this? :D | 18:48 |
| micahg | shadeslayer: no, you file a request on the lucid-backports project | 18:48 |
| micahg | !backports | shadeslayer | 18:48 |
| shadeslayer | right | 18:48 |
| ubottu | shadeslayer: If new updated Ubuntu packages are built for an application, then they may go into Ubuntu Backports. See https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports - See also !packaging | 18:48 |
| shadeslayer | micahg: i was browsing that page :P | 18:48 |
| didrocks | ari-tczew: your patches? only gnu-efi: | 18:48 |
| didrocks | ari-tczew: see https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnu-efi/+bug/595499/comments/1 | 18:48 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 595499 in gnu-efi (Ubuntu) "Please merge gnu-efi 3.0i-3(main) from debian unstable(main)" [Wishlist,Fix released] | 18:49 |
| micahg | shadeslayer: oh, you mean like requestsync?, sounds like a good candidate for u-d-t, maybe file a bug :) | 18:49 |
| ari-tczew | didrocks: yes, I mean gnu-efi | 18:49 |
| ari-tczew | sorry for confusing | 18:49 |
| didrocks | going for dinner now | 18:50 |
| shadeslayer | micahg: will look into it this weekend then ;) | 18:50 |
| ari-tczew | didrocks: I look forward to your response | 18:51 |
| didrocks | ari-tczew: I've answered | 18:52 |
| didrocks | ari-tczew: see, the first patch already contained everything, I took it | 18:52 |
| didrocks | ari-tczew: see my link | 18:52 |
| ari-tczew | didrocks: not enough. I've finished this patch enough for upload, so why someone else is as uploader? | 18:53 |
| ari-tczew | I'm upset this situation | 18:53 |
| didrocks | ari-tczew: but the first comment already contained that patch!!! | 18:54 |
| ari-tczew | sorry, but I'm not plain worker | 18:54 |
| didrocks | ari-tczew: the work was already done | 18:54 |
| Laney | The only change between your patch and the first one is the changelog | 18:54 |
| Laney | it's only polite to sponsor the one that was there first... | 18:54 |
| didrocks | thanks Laney, that's exactly what I mean :) | 18:55 |
| ari-tczew | I thought that our cooperate will be succesed | 18:55 |
| ari-tczew | sorry, but I don't want making patches for someone else and there is any word that I've worked on this | 18:55 |
| didrocks | ari-tczew: if you have done the work, someone else post the same patch just after the same patch slightely modified, won't you be upset if I sponsor the second? | 18:56 |
| Laney | ari-tczew: maybe you lost the changes you meant to add? | 18:59 |
| Laney | please have a look at your patch | 18:59 |
| ari-tczew | didrocks: I won't be upset, because because Bhavani said, that I can take this merge | 18:59 |
| didrocks | ari-tczew: I didn't see he told that, in that case, I'm sorry about that mistake, but in any case, there were no need for a second patch as the first one contained everything (all changes we have were in the first one) | 19:00 |
| didrocks | really going for dinner now | 19:00 |
| Laney | No, there's no mistake. Don't be sorry. | 19:00 |
| ari-tczew | didrocks, Laney: I have offer: I'll prepare a 100 merges and these patches are be not completed. you (both) will finish patches and all these 100 patches will be uploaded per my. it will be ok? | 19:01 |
| Laney | I've done many fixes where someone else gets the upload credit in the end | 19:01 |
| Laney | it's part of collaborative maintenance | 19:02 |
| Laney | at the end of the day your +related-software page doesn't mean that much | 19:02 |
| ari-tczew | Laney: so you will finish my 100 patches ok? | 19:03 |
| shadeslayer | will a package built in a ppa do fine for backports? | 19:03 |
| Laney | shadeslayer: if you've tested it, then as long as it's built in a clean environment it'll be fine | 19:03 |
| tyarusso | So I have a package that uses the new 3.0 (quilt) source format, but I have some people requesting it for jaunty/hardy - would someone be able to walk me through converting a copy to the old format for them? | 19:04 |
| shadeslayer | Laney: also.. is there any particular version for backports? | 19:04 |
| Laney | shadeslayer: does it require source changes | 19:04 |
| Laney | ? | 19:04 |
| ari-tczew | didrocks: did you read all comments on bug? Bhavani Shankar wrote on 2010-07-29 sure, go ahead! | 19:04 |
| shadeslayer | Laney: nope | 19:04 |
| ari-tczew | Laney: can you answer on my question? | 19:05 |
| Laney | ari-tczew: No, because you are being combative | 19:05 |
| shadeslayer | like.. do i version it 1.0-0ubuntu1~lucid1 or just 1.0-0ubuntu1 | 19:05 |
| Laney | shadeslayer: Then you don't need to worry, the archive admin scripts will take care of it | 19:05 |
| shadeslayer | ah ok | 19:05 |
| ari-tczew | Laney: I'm only getting my claim | 19:06 |
| porthose | tyarusso, remove /debian/source and rebuild | 19:06 |
| ari-tczew | even debian/changelog doesn't mean about me | 19:06 |
| ari-tczew | just a plain worker, which is finishing someones debdiffs | 19:06 |
| ari-tczew | Laney: maybe you can be a thrall, not me and I've respect for me | 19:07 |
| fabrice_sp | ari-tczew, claiming one line more in +related-software ? I really don't understand you | 19:07 |
| fabrice_sp | sorry to be crude, but this happens, and as I already told you: this is not the number that is important | 19:08 |
| ari-tczew | fabrice_sp: yes, this one more line | 19:08 |
| fabrice_sp | ari-tczew, and? | 19:08 |
| fabrice_sp | what's the point? | 19:08 |
| fabrice_sp | you win something? | 19:09 |
| fabrice_sp | no, I don't think so | 19:09 |
| tyarusso | porthose: Is that really all there is to it? Note that I do actually have a patch in debian/patches/. | 19:09 |
| ari-tczew | fabrice_sp: yes because it's a proof, that I've worked on this package | 19:09 |
| fabrice_sp | and? | 19:09 |
| porthose | tyarusso, I didn't say /debian/patche I said /debian/source | 19:09 |
| fabrice_sp | as a sponsor, I don't get rewarded for uploading others people package | 19:09 |
| ari-tczew | fabrice_sp: and it's a proof, that I've worked on this package | 19:09 |
| porthose | s/patche/patch/g | 19:10 |
| tyarusso | porthose: I know, but I was under the impression knowing that it was using the quilt format is what made the stuff in patches get applied. | 19:10 |
| fabrice_sp | ari-tczew, what for? what are you seeking? having touched all the packages in the universe? | 19:10 |
| porthose | aaah, then it will be a little more difficult | 19:11 |
| porthose | tyarusso, which package | 19:11 |
| fabrice_sp | anyway, /me goes back to do something useful | 19:11 |
| ari-tczew | fabrice_sp: no. he was lazy for update his patch. I've finished it and debian/changelog says that he finish it | 19:11 |
| tyarusso | porthose: nagios-agent, in the nagiosinc PPA. | 19:11 |
| bdrung | fabrice_sp: unassign sponsors and assign yourself before doing anything is a good idea. patches are welcome :) | 19:12 |
| ari-tczew | fabrice_sp: I feel like I cleaned up after somebody | 19:12 |
| porthose | tyarusso, see pm | 19:12 |
| fabrice_sp | bdrung, if you look at the changelog of the patch, you'll see that it's what I've done ;-) | 19:12 |
| fabrice_sp | s/patch/bug | 19:13 |
| bdrung | fabrice_sp: yes, but you did it after i loaded the bug page | 19:13 |
| ari-tczew | fabrice_sp, Laney, didrocks: my patch includes both workers on bug. I thought that it's fair. now I see that I'm nothing important here | 19:14 |
| fabrice_sp | bdrung, maybe: I always refresh the bug page before doing anything, to avoid that kind of 'cross work' :-) | 19:14 |
| fabrice_sp | bdrung, I think I'll update ack-sync to first unsubscribe the sponsors and then download the source. Shouldn't be to complicated | 19:16 |
| bdrung | fabrice_sp: maybe we should update ack-sync to check for assigned people | 19:16 |
| fabrice_sp | is it a long build? becuase I subscribe around 15 minutes before you uploaded it, so I really first step should be subscribe the sponsor to the bug | 19:17 |
| bdrung | fabrice_sp: yes, it took quite a while | 19:18 |
| fabrice_sp | bdrung, so I think you were already building it when I assigned it to myself | 19:19 |
| bdrung | fabrice_sp: are you working on ack-sync? | 19:20 |
| fabrice_sp | I was going to update it to assign the bug to sponsor as the first step | 19:20 |
| bdrung | fabrice_sp: can you add a check if there is someone assigned to it? | 19:21 |
| fabrice_sp | bdrung, I'm no python guru, but I can try :-) | 19:21 |
| bdrung | fabrice_sp: i can do it if you want | 19:22 |
| fabrice_sp | hmm, I think it will be quicker and less error prone if you do it, but I can also try. It's up to you | 19:23 |
| bdrung | fabrice_sp: ok, i give it a try | 19:25 |
| fabrice_sp | ok | 19:25 |
| fabrice_sp | have to reboot | 19:27 |
| === shadeslayer is now known as shadeslayer|kde | ||
| === shadeslayer|kde is now known as shadeslayer | ||
| shadeslayer | bdrung: thanks for the qtcurve sync ;) | 19:54 |
| bdrung | shadeslayer: yw | 19:59 |
| shadeslayer | bdrung: another one coming up :P | 19:59 |
| bdrung | shadeslayer: great. need some for testing my ack-sync changes :) | 20:00 |
| shadeslayer | it seems there are 2 parts to that package | 20:00 |
| shadeslayer | awesome :D | 20:00 |
| shadeslayer | bdrung: bug 613974 | 20:08 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 613974 in gtk2-engines-qtcurve (Ubuntu) "Sync gtk2-engines-qtcurve 1.5.2-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/613974 | 20:08 |
| shadeslayer | build log attached | 20:09 |
| zooko | Dear people of #ubuntu-motu: Tahoe-LAFS needs an upgrade! There is a very reliable new version of Tahoe-LAFS available upstream. I would be happy to get this new version into Maverick. The FeatureFreeze is approaching. Help! :-) | 20:34 |
| zooko | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tahoe-lafs/+bug/609755 | 20:34 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 609755 in tahoe-lafs (Ubuntu) "please upgrade to tahoe-lafs v1.7.1" [Undecided,New] | 20:34 |
| bdrung | zooko: you need to find someone who actually does the update. maybe ask the previous uploader? | 20:50 |
| bdrung | fabrice_sp: uploaded | 21:05 |
| bdrung | please test | 21:05 |
| fabrice_sp | bdrung, thanks! is there any sync request left?! :-) | 21:09 |
| bdrung | fabrice_sp: yes | 21:09 |
| ScottK | zooko: Did you get tahoe-lafs into Debian yet? | 21:10 |
| fabrice_sp | oh right: 4 | 21:10 |
| fabrice_sp | taking bug 613931 to test | 21:12 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 613931 in Ubuntu "Sync oauth-signpost 1.2.1.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/613931 | 21:12 |
| zooko | ScottK: no, it is not in Debian. | 21:14 |
| zooko | bdrung: thanks! Let's see, who *was* that... Here's my list of everyone who helped get Tahoe-LAFS into Karmic in the first place: http://pubgrid.tahoe-lafs.org/uri/URI:DIR2-RO:ixqhc4kdbjxc7o65xjnveoewym:5x6lwoxghrd5rxhwunzavft2qygfkt27oj3fbxlq4c6p45z5uneq/blog.html#2009-09-02 | 21:16 |
| zooko | iulian: are you available to help with this? | 21:16 |
| fabrice_sp | bdrung, ack-sync is trying to do something with my mouse | 21:22 |
| fabrice_sp | the pointer change to a cross | 21:22 |
| bdrung | fabrice_sp: wtf? | 21:22 |
| fabrice_sp | yeah :-/ | 21:23 |
| fabrice_sp | forget it: I was running sh ack-sync | 21:23 |
| fabrice_sp | instead of ack-sync directly | 21:23 |
| fabrice_sp | bdrung, status could have been changed to In Progress, no? | 21:24 |
| bdrung | fabrice_sp: sh ack-sync? it's a python script! | 21:25 |
| fabrice_sp | yeah: I'm tired! :-D | 21:25 |
| bdrung | fabrice_sp: yes, setting in progress would be possible. | 21:26 |
| fabrice_sp | but the effect is strange :-) | 21:26 |
| fabrice_sp | try and you'll see ;-) | 21:26 |
| fabrice_sp | seems good! | 21:31 |
| ajmitch | fabrice_sp: it was probably trying to run 'import' | 21:33 |
| ajmitch | which is part of imagemagick, used for taking screenshots :) | 21:33 |
| ajmitch | faces of doom | 21:34 |
| ajmitch | meh | 21:34 |
| fabrice_sp | ehhhhh | 21:34 |
| fabrice_sp | that's why it was trying to capture something on my screen ;-) | 21:34 |
| scott-work | a week or go i was looking for a web page that mentioned packages that failed to build from source, i thought the link started with people.canonical.com | 21:45 |
| scott-work | i found it again: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/NBS/ | 21:45 |
| scott-work | just wanted to share that with the group :) | 21:46 |
| scott-work | although it's not FTFS but rather NBS | 21:46 |
| scott-work | s/FTFS/FTBFS | 21:46 |
| micahg | scott-work: yeah, those are binaries without a source | 21:49 |
| paultag | Hey MOTU. I'll cross-post here because I'm not having much luck. I'm trying to use source format 3's multiple tar.gz feature, but I'm not having much luck. The Deb spec ( yes i've googled this ;) ) seems to suggest that it's to be inside the orig.tar.gz, and that can't be right | 21:52 |
| paultag | Has anyone used this & have any idea as to where it extracts the "sister" tar.gz files? | 21:52 |
| bdrung | paultag: we use two tarballs in eclipse | 22:00 |
| bdrung | paultag: apt-get source eclipse | 22:00 |
| paultag | bdrung: thanks | 22:00 |
| bdrung | \o/ i sponsored the first merge request with sponsor-patch \o/ | 22:03 |
| micahg | bdrung: want another to sponsor? | 22:04 |
| bdrung | micahg: yes (otherwise i pick a random main merge request) | 22:05 |
| micahg | bdrung: I need to file the bug, give me a minute | 22:05 |
| micahg | bdrung: bug 614036 | 22:09 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 614036 in request-tracker3.8 (Ubuntu) "Please merge request-tracker3.8 3.8.8-1 from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/614036 | 22:09 |
| paultag | thank bdrung. I think I've got it. Thanks for the tip, that really helped | 22:11 |
| bdrung | you're welcome | 22:11 |
| bdrung | sponsor-patch needs work | 22:12 |
| ScottK | scott-work: I think you want http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | 22:51 |
| highvoltage | the freeze is over right? | 22:52 |
| ScottK | Yes. | 22:54 |
| highvoltage | whohoo! | 22:54 |
| micahg | bdrung: should I just subscribe u-s to my merge bug? | 22:58 |
| ari-tczew | is merges.ubuntu.com closed? | 22:58 |
| bdrung | micahg: nope. | 22:59 |
| micahg | bdrung: k, I'll be patient :) | 22:59 |
| bdrung | micahg: it just takes a little bit longer... | 23:00 |
| micahg | ok | 23:00 |
| ari-tczew | didrocks: around? | 23:08 |
| bdrung | micahg: done | 23:45 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!