=== fta_ is now known as fta [02:20] * ScottK decides to hit "save as draft" instead of publish to his blog post about the notion that planet.ubuntu.com should be multilingual. [02:22] slightly inflammatory? [02:25] Yes and the comments of the outraged are entirely predictable. [02:29] Clearly from my position of priviledge I can't understand the perspective of the downtrodden, so it will have to be explained to me. === mase_wk is now known as WizzardOfOz === WizzardOfOz is now known as mase_wk === jdong_ is now known as jdong [06:42] good morning! [06:42] Packaging Training Session: Fixing Small Ubuntu Bugs in 18 minutes in #ubuntu-classroom [06:46] zul: do you mind if I merge request-tracker3.8? [07:10] * ajmitch is watching #u-classroom, honest === mdeslaur-afk is now known as mdeslaur === ara_ is now known as ara [08:04] wgrant: How often is http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/ftbfs/ updated? [08:10] sbronsted: Once an hour. [08:11] * micahg can't wait for sparc to go away, that page will be much smaller :) [08:13] wgrant: But when I build eg httpcomponents-core locally I don't get an error !? [08:13] micahg: So will the archive. [08:14] sbronsted: the packages don't get automatically retried (except DEPWAIT) and the page only shows the current state [08:14] TheMuso: can you extend my membership in ubuntu-universe-sponsors so I can keep running the script that auto-assigns u-u-s bugs to ubuntu-sponsors? [08:14] wgrant: and when I look a the error log in launchpad it is from the 2010-06-15 !? [08:15] sbronsted: that log does mention that it's executing maven in offline mode, so it may only have issues when unable to fetch stuff from the internet [08:15] the buildds have no internet access at all, so builds must be self-contained [08:16] * ajmitch doesn't know enough about it to know if that error is the cause of it, but it's the most likely [08:16] but I will expect the build script always build offline (I hope) [08:18] given that it's only had one debian upload, and it's arch: all, it's something that's easily missed [08:20] you may find answers in #ubuntu-java [08:21] sbronsted: We don't retry every build failure every day. [08:21] given that it doesn't appear anymore in the recent archive rebuild anymore, I give it back to a retry [08:21] let's see what happens [08:23] * ajmitch would expect the same sort of result tbh [08:23] and launchpad explodes in a ball of flame [08:25] wgrant: so how do know which of the build errors still are still valid? [08:25] sorry: ....still are valid [08:25] sbronsted: That page can't tell you that. [08:25] Launchpad doesn't know. [08:27] sbronsted: check if the package builds now and request a give-back if it does. All the page show is the current state in the archive (that a package didn't got build when it got tried) [08:32] geser: you mention "recent archive rebuild". How do I see that? [08:38] sbronsted: the results are here: http://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/ubuntu_ftbfs.cgi [08:46] ajmitch: "Successfully built on rothera (i386)" for httpcomponents-core and LP still seems to be there :) [08:47] geser: the httpcomponent-core build is okay now [08:48] sbronsted: yes, it should vanish from http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ on the next update of that page [08:50] Laney: I'm trying to build several chroots systems for pbuilder I've modified my .pbuilderrc ( http://pastebin.com/DFg1Ry0S ) so results can be placed in a different directory, then I've run pbuilder-dist and it seems like it doesnt read that file, which file should I change instaed (I've already tried with the $VARS available, but they're not enough)? [08:51] geser: OK, I was wrong :) === CieD is now known as Ciemon [08:51] geser: LP exploding was it telling me that it was unable to contact a server [08:51] which went away on page refresh [08:52] ajmitch: did you get an oops ? [08:52] no OOPS [08:52] otherwise I'd have something useful to tell you [08:52] this was on edge, btw [08:52] When was that? [08:52] did you grab a picture ? [08:52] That's meant to be fixed. [08:53] lifeless: no I didn't, it was afaik a standard "sorry, please try again" sort of message, 30 minutes ago now [08:53] Damn. [08:53] sorry [08:53] It must have regressed. [08:54] But I don't see how. [08:54] edge upgrade perhaps [08:54] Possibly, true. [08:54] wgrant: were you on edge? [08:54] It wasn't me. [08:54] doesn't that message come up when there's no appserver to talk to, however briefly? [08:54] bah [08:54] ajmitch: & [08:55] sorry that I didn't get info from it, if it happens again I'll grab a screenshot at least [08:56] ajmitch: we have dozens of appservers [08:56] ajmitch: so its not meant to happen at all [09:37] mornig === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === yofel_ is now known as yofel [12:55] dholbach_: If nobody else has done it by now, sure I'll take care of it. [12:57] dholbach_: done [13:30] https://merges.ubuntu.com/universe.html [13:30] houston we have an issue ! [13:30] :) === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta [14:12] TheMuso: thanks === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach === fta_ is now known as fta [15:15] dholbach, jpds, nhandler: anyone from motu council want to weigh in on the ubuntu-tweak question? [15:17] Riddell: the MOTU Council is not around any more - I don't have any opinion on it [15:18] dholbach: shouldn't https://edge.launchpad.net/~motu-council be updated then? [15:18] Riddell: yeah, thanks [15:34] Riddell: Such questions should go to the TB now. [16:01] zul: do you mind if I merge request-tracker3.8? [16:01] micahg: no go ahead [16:01] zul: thanks === nigelbabu is now known as nigelb [17:46] hi.. https://merges.ubuntu.com/ seems to be down, any particular reason? [17:47] ( opening anything gives me a 500 error ) [18:34] bdrung, about bug 623870 [18:34] Error: Could not parse data returned by Launchpad: 623870 (https://launchpad.net/bugs/623870) [18:34] bug 613870 [18:34] Launchpad bug 613870 in gambas2 (Ubuntu) "Please sync gambas2 2.21.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)." [Wishlist,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/613870 [18:35] I was working on it (assigned to me) [18:36] perhaps, the first of ack-sync should be unassign sponsors and assign yourself [18:36] +step [18:37] I assume you are looking at 613891, so I'll stop looking at the sponsoriship queue [18:42] would it be a good idea to get a new package in maverick into lucid backports? [18:43] ( qoauth to be specific ) [18:44] shadeslayer: if people need it in Lucid and it doesn't have a lot of deps, you can request it [18:44] ok.. ill just check the deps once [18:44] didrocks: ping [18:46] didrocks: how do you upload debdiffs? why my patches are signed to Bhavani Shankar? I don't understand this situation. bug 595499 [18:46] Launchpad bug 595499 in gnu-efi (Ubuntu) "Please merge gnu-efi 3.0i-3(main) from debian unstable(main)" [Wishlist,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/595499 [18:47] micahg: seems to have minimal deps : Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7.0.50~), libqca2-dev, qt4-qmake, libqca2-plugin-ossl [18:48] shadeslayer: looks good :) [18:48] micahg: is there a script of sorts to do this? :D [18:48] shadeslayer: no, you file a request on the lucid-backports project [18:48] !backports | shadeslayer [18:48] right [18:48] shadeslayer: If new updated Ubuntu packages are built for an application, then they may go into Ubuntu Backports. See https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports - See also !packaging [18:48] micahg: i was browsing that page :P [18:48] ari-tczew: your patches? only gnu-efi: [18:48] ari-tczew: see https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnu-efi/+bug/595499/comments/1 [18:49] Launchpad bug 595499 in gnu-efi (Ubuntu) "Please merge gnu-efi 3.0i-3(main) from debian unstable(main)" [Wishlist,Fix released] [18:49] shadeslayer: oh, you mean like requestsync?, sounds like a good candidate for u-d-t, maybe file a bug :) [18:49] didrocks: yes, I mean gnu-efi [18:49] sorry for confusing [18:50] going for dinner now [18:50] micahg: will look into it this weekend then ;) [18:51] didrocks: I look forward to your response [18:52] ari-tczew: I've answered [18:52] ari-tczew: see, the first patch already contained everything, I took it [18:52] ari-tczew: see my link [18:53] didrocks: not enough. I've finished this patch enough for upload, so why someone else is as uploader? [18:53] I'm upset this situation [18:54] ari-tczew: but the first comment already contained that patch!!! [18:54] sorry, but I'm not plain worker [18:54] ari-tczew: the work was already done [18:54] The only change between your patch and the first one is the changelog [18:54] it's only polite to sponsor the one that was there first... [18:55] thanks Laney, that's exactly what I mean :) [18:55] I thought that our cooperate will be succesed [18:55] sorry, but I don't want making patches for someone else and there is any word that I've worked on this [18:56] ari-tczew: if you have done the work, someone else post the same patch just after the same patch slightely modified, won't you be upset if I sponsor the second? [18:59] ari-tczew: maybe you lost the changes you meant to add? [18:59] please have a look at your patch [18:59] didrocks: I won't be upset, because because Bhavani said, that I can take this merge [19:00] ari-tczew: I didn't see he told that, in that case, I'm sorry about that mistake, but in any case, there were no need for a second patch as the first one contained everything (all changes we have were in the first one) [19:00] really going for dinner now [19:00] No, there's no mistake. Don't be sorry. [19:01] didrocks, Laney: I have offer: I'll prepare a 100 merges and these patches are be not completed. you (both) will finish patches and all these 100 patches will be uploaded per my. it will be ok? [19:01] I've done many fixes where someone else gets the upload credit in the end [19:02] it's part of collaborative maintenance [19:02] at the end of the day your +related-software page doesn't mean that much [19:03] Laney: so you will finish my 100 patches ok? [19:03] will a package built in a ppa do fine for backports? [19:03] shadeslayer: if you've tested it, then as long as it's built in a clean environment it'll be fine [19:04] So I have a package that uses the new 3.0 (quilt) source format, but I have some people requesting it for jaunty/hardy - would someone be able to walk me through converting a copy to the old format for them? [19:04] Laney: also.. is there any particular version for backports? [19:04] shadeslayer: does it require source changes [19:04] ? [19:04] didrocks: did you read all comments on bug? Bhavani Shankar wrote on 2010-07-29 sure, go ahead! [19:04] Laney: nope [19:05] Laney: can you answer on my question? [19:05] ari-tczew: No, because you are being combative [19:05] like.. do i version it 1.0-0ubuntu1~lucid1 or just 1.0-0ubuntu1 [19:05] shadeslayer: Then you don't need to worry, the archive admin scripts will take care of it [19:05] ah ok [19:06] Laney: I'm only getting my claim [19:06] tyarusso, remove /debian/source and rebuild [19:06] even debian/changelog doesn't mean about me [19:06] just a plain worker, which is finishing someones debdiffs [19:07] Laney: maybe you can be a thrall, not me and I've respect for me [19:07] ari-tczew, claiming one line more in +related-software ? I really don't understand you [19:08] sorry to be crude, but this happens, and as I already told you: this is not the number that is important [19:08] fabrice_sp: yes, this one more line [19:08] ari-tczew, and? [19:08] what's the point? [19:09] you win something? [19:09] no, I don't think so [19:09] porthose: Is that really all there is to it? Note that I do actually have a patch in debian/patches/. [19:09] fabrice_sp: yes because it's a proof, that I've worked on this package [19:09] and? [19:09] tyarusso, I didn't say /debian/patche I said /debian/source [19:09] as a sponsor, I don't get rewarded for uploading others people package [19:09] fabrice_sp: and it's a proof, that I've worked on this package [19:10] s/patche/patch/g [19:10] porthose: I know, but I was under the impression knowing that it was using the quilt format is what made the stuff in patches get applied. [19:10] ari-tczew, what for? what are you seeking? having touched all the packages in the universe? [19:11] aaah, then it will be a little more difficult [19:11] tyarusso, which package [19:11] anyway, /me goes back to do something useful [19:11] fabrice_sp: no. he was lazy for update his patch. I've finished it and debian/changelog says that he finish it [19:11] porthose: nagios-agent, in the nagiosinc PPA. [19:12] fabrice_sp: unassign sponsors and assign yourself before doing anything is a good idea. patches are welcome :) [19:12] fabrice_sp: I feel like I cleaned up after somebody [19:12] tyarusso, see pm [19:12] bdrung, if you look at the changelog of the patch, you'll see that it's what I've done ;-) [19:13] s/patch/bug [19:13] fabrice_sp: yes, but you did it after i loaded the bug page [19:14] fabrice_sp, Laney, didrocks: my patch includes both workers on bug. I thought that it's fair. now I see that I'm nothing important here [19:14] bdrung, maybe: I always refresh the bug page before doing anything, to avoid that kind of 'cross work' :-) [19:16] bdrung, I think I'll update ack-sync to first unsubscribe the sponsors and then download the source. Shouldn't be to complicated [19:16] fabrice_sp: maybe we should update ack-sync to check for assigned people [19:17] is it a long build? becuase I subscribe around 15 minutes before you uploaded it, so I really first step should be subscribe the sponsor to the bug [19:18] fabrice_sp: yes, it took quite a while [19:19] bdrung, so I think you were already building it when I assigned it to myself [19:20] fabrice_sp: are you working on ack-sync? [19:20] I was going to update it to assign the bug to sponsor as the first step [19:21] fabrice_sp: can you add a check if there is someone assigned to it? [19:21] bdrung, I'm no python guru, but I can try :-) [19:22] fabrice_sp: i can do it if you want [19:23] hmm, I think it will be quicker and less error prone if you do it, but I can also try. It's up to you [19:25] fabrice_sp: ok, i give it a try [19:25] ok [19:27] have to reboot === shadeslayer is now known as shadeslayer|kde === shadeslayer|kde is now known as shadeslayer [19:54] bdrung: thanks for the qtcurve sync ;) [19:59] shadeslayer: yw [19:59] bdrung: another one coming up :P [20:00] shadeslayer: great. need some for testing my ack-sync changes :) [20:00] it seems there are 2 parts to that package [20:00] awesome :D [20:08] bdrung: bug 613974 [20:08] Launchpad bug 613974 in gtk2-engines-qtcurve (Ubuntu) "Sync gtk2-engines-qtcurve 1.5.2-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/613974 [20:09] build log attached [20:34] Dear people of #ubuntu-motu: Tahoe-LAFS needs an upgrade! There is a very reliable new version of Tahoe-LAFS available upstream. I would be happy to get this new version into Maverick. The FeatureFreeze is approaching. Help! :-) [20:34] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tahoe-lafs/+bug/609755 [20:34] Launchpad bug 609755 in tahoe-lafs (Ubuntu) "please upgrade to tahoe-lafs v1.7.1" [Undecided,New] [20:50] zooko: you need to find someone who actually does the update. maybe ask the previous uploader? [21:05] fabrice_sp: uploaded [21:05] please test [21:09] bdrung, thanks! is there any sync request left?! :-) [21:09] fabrice_sp: yes [21:10] zooko: Did you get tahoe-lafs into Debian yet? [21:10] oh right: 4 [21:12] taking bug 613931 to test [21:12] Launchpad bug 613931 in Ubuntu "Sync oauth-signpost 1.2.1.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/613931 [21:14] ScottK: no, it is not in Debian. [21:16] bdrung: thanks! Let's see, who *was* that... Here's my list of everyone who helped get Tahoe-LAFS into Karmic in the first place: http://pubgrid.tahoe-lafs.org/uri/URI:DIR2-RO:ixqhc4kdbjxc7o65xjnveoewym:5x6lwoxghrd5rxhwunzavft2qygfkt27oj3fbxlq4c6p45z5uneq/blog.html#2009-09-02 [21:16] iulian: are you available to help with this? [21:22] bdrung, ack-sync is trying to do something with my mouse [21:22] the pointer change to a cross [21:22] fabrice_sp: wtf? [21:23] yeah :-/ [21:23] forget it: I was running sh ack-sync [21:23] instead of ack-sync directly [21:24] bdrung, status could have been changed to In Progress, no? [21:25] fabrice_sp: sh ack-sync? it's a python script! [21:25] yeah: I'm tired! :-D [21:26] fabrice_sp: yes, setting in progress would be possible. [21:26] but the effect is strange :-) [21:26] try and you'll see ;-) [21:31] seems good! [21:33] fabrice_sp: it was probably trying to run 'import' [21:33] which is part of imagemagick, used for taking screenshots :) [21:34] faces of doom [21:34] meh [21:34] ehhhhh [21:34] that's why it was trying to capture something on my screen ;-) [21:45] a week or go i was looking for a web page that mentioned packages that failed to build from source, i thought the link started with people.canonical.com [21:45] i found it again: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/NBS/ [21:46] just wanted to share that with the group :) [21:46] although it's not FTFS but rather NBS [21:46] s/FTFS/FTBFS [21:49] scott-work: yeah, those are binaries without a source [21:52] Hey MOTU. I'll cross-post here because I'm not having much luck. I'm trying to use source format 3's multiple tar.gz feature, but I'm not having much luck. The Deb spec ( yes i've googled this ;) ) seems to suggest that it's to be inside the orig.tar.gz, and that can't be right [21:52] Has anyone used this & have any idea as to where it extracts the "sister" tar.gz files? [22:00] paultag: we use two tarballs in eclipse [22:00] paultag: apt-get source eclipse [22:00] bdrung: thanks [22:03] \o/ i sponsored the first merge request with sponsor-patch \o/ [22:04] bdrung: want another to sponsor? [22:05] micahg: yes (otherwise i pick a random main merge request) [22:05] bdrung: I need to file the bug, give me a minute [22:09] bdrung: bug 614036 [22:09] Launchpad bug 614036 in request-tracker3.8 (Ubuntu) "Please merge request-tracker3.8 3.8.8-1 from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/614036 [22:11] thank bdrung. I think I've got it. Thanks for the tip, that really helped [22:11] you're welcome [22:12] sponsor-patch needs work [22:51] scott-work: I think you want http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ [22:52] the freeze is over right? [22:54] Yes. [22:54] whohoo! [22:58] bdrung: should I just subscribe u-s to my merge bug? [22:58] is merges.ubuntu.com closed? [22:59] micahg: nope. [22:59] bdrung: k, I'll be patient :) [23:00] micahg: it just takes a little bit longer... [23:00] ok [23:08] didrocks: around? [23:45] micahg: done