| Hoober | hey folks | 07:40 |
|---|---|---|
| Hoober | many familiar face in here | 07:40 |
| bazhang | Hoober, how may we help you | 07:40 |
| Hoober | so like | 07:41 |
| Hoober | this support channel? | 07:41 |
| maco | nope | 07:41 |
| bazhang | this would be the place to resolve bans from non-core channels | 07:41 |
| Hoober | ok | 07:42 |
| Hoober | too meta then? | 07:42 |
| Hoober | wait | 07:43 |
| Hoober | am i banned from a non-core channel | 07:43 |
| Hoober | like women? | 07:43 |
| bazhang | yes | 07:43 |
| rww | yes | 07:43 |
| Hoober | ok we should resolve that | 07:44 |
| bazhang | and here is the person to discuss it with! | 07:44 |
| Hoober | i don't see her | 07:44 |
| Hoober | ok well | 07:44 |
| Hoober | now i think i am hallucinating | 07:44 |
| rww | Hoober: I think bazhang means me ;) | 07:45 |
| Hoober | because these are too many ubuntu channels | 07:45 |
| Hoober | and you all have similar names | 07:45 |
| bazhang | Hoober, rww is a 'he' last I checked | 07:45 |
| maco | rww: since when are you a her? | 07:45 |
| Hoober | is it 9-11 | 07:46 |
| Hoober | are you shy | 07:48 |
| Hoober | maco? | 07:48 |
| Hoober | i am going to meta | 07:48 |
| Hoober | i am not getting any closer to sucking your titties my standing here maco | 07:49 |
| Hoober | ok that i admit was a troll | 07:49 |
| Hoober | no hard feelings? | 07:50 |
| Hoober | emma | 07:50 |
| Hoober | i like your name | 07:50 |
| Hoober | it reminds me of that girl who cybered me, and wasn't a girl but just a person who wanted to know how i was hacking city of heroes | 07:50 |
| Hoober | yeah | 07:50 |
| bazhang | !ops | Hoober | 07:51 |
| ubottu | Hoober: Help! Channel emergency! (ONLY use this trigger in emergencies) - elky, Madpilot, tritium, Nalioth, tonyyarusso, PriceChild, Amaranth, jrib, Myrtti, mneptok, Pici, jpds, gnomefreak, bazhang, jussi, Flannel, ikonia, maco, h00k, IdleOne, or nhandler! | 07:51 |
| Hoober | !ops | 07:51 |
| IdleOne | Hoober: leave now. return in 72 hours | 07:53 |
| Hoober | wait | 07:53 |
| IdleOne | good evening. | 07:53 |
| Hoober | this is different channel | 07:53 |
| IdleOne | no waiting. that is it. | 07:53 |
| Hoober | gosh darn | 07:53 |
| Hoober | are you a girl atleast | 07:53 |
| rww | oh god, I have ops in here, too? this cloak is crazy. | 07:53 |
| Hoober | just tell me before i go | 07:53 |
| bazhang | why is rww not allowed in -ops? | 07:54 |
| Hoober | PLEASE | 07:54 |
| Hoober | i am a boy | 07:54 |
| Hoober | or man | 07:54 |
| IdleOne | he isn't a core op. but I think he should be | 07:54 |
| rww | bazhang: *!*@ubuntu/member/* is on -irc's access list | 07:54 |
| Hoober | would it help if i told you m y age | 07:54 |
| maco | rww: yes, /lots/ of ops in here | 07:54 |
| rww | bazhang: the only places I'm a named op are non-core channels | 07:54 |
| bazhang | rww, that is silly | 07:54 |
| maco | i was allowed in -ops before becoming an op in a core channe | 07:54 |
| maco | *channel | 07:54 |
| maco | i was only an op in #ubuntuforums and -women at the time | 07:55 |
| rww | maco: the degree to which the rule's enforced has changed over time | 07:55 |
| elky | What a pest. | 08:09 |
| rww | not sure why he'd want to come back in 72 hours, though. He's not getting back in #ubuntu-women any time soon :\ | 08:11 |
| IdleOne | rww: he has been given a 72 hour window for the bans in other channels also. I figured it was a good round number | 08:11 |
| IdleOne | makes him 3 for 3 now | 08:12 |
| rww | ah, okay, didn't know that | 08:13 |
| IdleOne | you would have if you were in -ops | 08:13 |
| IdleOne | :/ | 08:13 |
| bazhang | yep | 08:13 |
| bazhang | honestly, even some non-ops should be able to idle there, like mc44 | 08:16 |
| rww | maybe I should put on my wiki page: "I would like to be an #ubuntu op so I can hang out in #ubuntu-ops, poke at the bantracker myself, and bend the Encyclopedia plugin to my will. It is concievable that would even op up in #ubuntu at some point too." | 08:16 |
| rww | s/that would/that I would/ | 08:16 |
| * rww kids, somewhat | 08:16 | |
| bazhang | at the very least rww, and why don't you have it in -ot? | 08:17 |
| bazhang | there are people on that list who are long gone, and some who I have never heard of , let alone seen. | 08:17 |
| IdleOne | I don't agree with the non ops being in -ops but I think that all ops in ubuntu namespace should be allowed, it could only benefit the community as a whole to have all the ops together. | 08:17 |
| rww | people keep asking me this. I swear I remember being a pain in the backside in -offtopic for months | 08:18 |
| IdleOne | of course only if they want to join | 08:18 |
| bazhang | certain people (as mentioned above) have invaluable insight and info | 08:18 |
| IdleOne | rww: you were lol but would still be a good op for that channel. | 08:18 |
| IdleOne | bazhang: the whole allowing certain non-ops into the channel creates a divide in the community. | 08:19 |
| bazhang | IdleOne, not really | 08:19 |
| IdleOne | questions like " Why is he allowed and not me?" | 08:19 |
| IdleOne | you like him/favoritism and all that | 08:19 |
| bazhang | he was allowed for ages and ages in the past | 08:19 |
| bazhang | no schism burst forth then | 08:20 |
| IdleOne | in the past yes but the community has grown so much | 08:20 |
| bazhang | which does not address my point | 08:20 |
| IdleOne | there are a lot of people who would be assets to the ops team. They should apply :) | 08:20 |
| rww | then you should go convince the IRCC to ask for more ops ;P | 08:21 |
| * IdleOne pokes the IRCC | 08:21 | |
| IdleOne | hehe | 08:21 |
| IdleOne | there is nothing stopping anyone from submitting an application to the IRCC now | 08:21 |
| bazhang | well that boat has sailed. the ones who did idle and no longer do won't come back willingly. | 08:21 |
| bazhang | no | 08:22 |
| bazhang | the whole point is to have people outside of the team to take an unbiased and critical look. | 08:22 |
| IdleOne | anybody in the community is welcome to contact the IRCC if they have concerns or suggestions to make. | 08:24 |
| IdleOne | I made a couple before I became a op | 08:24 |
| bazhang | moot at this point. | 08:24 |
| IdleOne | Anyway, I say rww should be allowed in -ops | 08:25 |
| * IdleOne makes a sign | 08:25 | |
| bazhang | yep. | 08:26 |
| elky | IdleOne, do you have any concept of just how many people "all ops in the ubuntu namespace" is? | 08:36 |
| elky | (psst, loco channels are in the ubuntu namespace) | 08:37 |
| rww | I wonder what the intersection is of people who are ops in the ubuntu namespace and people who are banned from core channels | 08:37 |
| elky | There's a rogues in the mix, yes. | 08:38 |
| elky | *a few | 08:38 |
| elky | Not enough to count on a hand afaik, but still, more than 0 | 08:38 |
| topyli | rww: btw your projected wiki entry, ops don't automatically get access to the bot :) | 10:59 |
| * topyli has no access | 11:00 | |
| === k1l_ is now known as k1l | ||
| IdleOne | elky: I don't see how the number of ops in a channel makes a difference. I admit the idea is not perfect. | 16:00 |
| elky | IdleOne, the number of people in -ops is relevant when it comes to how people react in there. | 16:01 |
| IdleOne | oh you mean relevant to the user who is joining? | 16:03 |
| IdleOne | One day all the problems of the world will be resolved and we will have no need for governments | 16:05 |
| IdleOne | or in this case ops on irc | 16:05 |
| IdleOne | :) | 16:05 |
| === radoe_ is now known as radoe | ||
| === bazhang_ is now known as bazhang | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!