[04:38] <Andre_Gondim> hi, I don't know if here is the place to say, but in maverick I can't install ubuntu-restricted-extras, 'cause ubuntu-restricted-addons is missing
[04:41] <Flannel> Andre_Gondim: #ubuntu+1 I imagine
[04:41] <Andre_Gondim> thanks Flannel
[06:04] <zooko> Okay we've announced that Tahoe-LAFS 1.8.0 final will be released Wed, Aug 11.
[06:04] <zooko> This is because the Maverick Feature Freeze is Aug 12.
[06:04] <zooko> I'm hoping to get Tahoe-LAFS 1.8.0 into Maverick.
[06:29] <zooko> Folks: could anyone help me get my pyutil library packaged for Debian/Ubuntu?
[06:29] <zooko> It would help with this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfec/+bug/606022
[06:30] <zooko> Although technically pyutil really isn't required for zfec, only for certain optional features of zfec.
[06:52] <AnAnt> zooko: well, why put pyutil in Depends if it isn't really required ?
[06:52] <AnAnt> zooko: you can put it in suggests instead
[06:53] <zooko> As far as I understand it *isn't* actually in Depends at this time, but some people think that it should be since the Python packaging metadata of zfec specifies pyutil as an install_requires.
[06:59] <AnAnt> zooko: I think they are right, since I see unconditional import'ing from pyutil (without even try catch)
[07:00] <AnAnt> zooko: namely in filefec.py
[07:04] <AnAnt> zooko: ok, so what help is needed ?
[07:08] <AnAnt> zooko: so, where's your pyutil package ?
[07:11] <zooko> Hi!
[07:12] <zooko> http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/pyutil
[07:14] <AnAnt> zooko: oh, I thought you already prepared the package
[07:15] <zooko> Sorry. Just a minute let me see how well this old tool works....
[07:24] <zooko> Well, AnAnt, I appreciate your help, but I'm way too sleepy to continue.
[07:24] <AnAnt> ok
[07:24] <zooko> If you're around this weekend I might ping you again once I have some debian/ or DSC files or something.
[07:24] <zooko> I was intending to try the stdeb tool to generate those.
[07:24] <zooko> http://github.com/astraw/stdeb
[07:25] <zooko> Goodnight!
[07:54] <bilalakhtar> M-o-m is down
[07:59] <dupondje> since like 3 days :p
[08:20] <bilalakhtar> dupondje: Really?
[08:21] <bilalakhtar> I noticed it today!
[08:48] <AnAnt> Could someone review this package: http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/thawab ?
[10:04] <AnAnt> Could someone review this package: http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/thawab ?
[10:04] <AnAnt> bbl
[11:11] <X3> hi guys im getting this on a lm-sensors build from new upstream https://launchpad.net/~x3lectric/+archive/experimental/+build/1908608/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-karmic-i386.lm-sensors-3_1:3.1.2+5852~0ubuntu0~karmic1~ppa2_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[11:16] <geser> check if those patches are still needed (or applied upstream) and update the failing ones if necessary
[11:18] <X3> all patches needed this is a new lm-sensors build cutting edge
[11:18] <X3> how do i update the failing ones
[11:38] <ari-tczew> tumbleweed: ping
[12:03] <geser> X3: which patch system does it use?
[12:08] <ari-tczew> geser: do you have 64bit system?
[12:13] <geser> ari-tczew: yes
[12:14] <ari-tczew> geser: could you test build it? http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/sapwood/sapwood_3.1.1.debian.10+0m5-2.dsc
[12:15] <geser> ari-tczew: not currently as I'm not a home
[12:15] <ari-tczew> aha
[12:15] <geser> ari-tczew: why not upload to PPA?
[12:15] <ari-tczew> geser: I don;t know
[12:52] <vish> could someone upload : https://code.launchpad.net/~vish/ubuntu/maverick/acidrip/fix602693/+merge/32029
[12:56] <ari-tczew> vish: I think that your patch should follow upstream (Debian).
[12:57] <Laney> the package isn't in debian
[12:57] <vish> ari-tczew: it seems not in debian
[12:57] <vish> yeah , what Laney said :)
[12:58] <ari-tczew> Laney, vish: "2" before ubuntu in version confused me, sorry
[12:58] <Laney> vish: there is a bug with a patch on it for acidrip
[12:58] <Laney> could you look at including that?
[12:59] <vish> Laney: hmm , not sure , i'm just making simple changes not an expert at packaging
[12:59] <Laney> or unmark it as a patch, ... whatever
[13:06] <AnAnt> could someone review this package: http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=thawab ?
[13:27] <ari-tczew> geser: I can't upload this package to PPA, because it's rejected: The signer of this package is lacking the upload rights for the source package, component or package set in question.
[13:28] <wgrant> ari-tczew: You didn't upload it to a PPA -- you uploaded it to the primary archive.
[13:28] <wgrant> Or possibly a PPA with an odd permission setup that you don't have access to -- there was a bug about that recently.
[13:30] <tumbleweed> ari-tczew: pong
[13:31] <ari-tczew> tumbleweed: interested in sync sponsoring
[13:31] <ari-tczew> ?
[13:31] <tumbleweed> ari-tczew: sure, in the queue?
[13:31] <ari-tczew> tumbleweed: ye
[13:31] <tumbleweed> k, I'll look in a minute
[13:32] <ari-tczew> ok
[13:50] <ari-tczew> tumbleweed: do you have 64bit system?
[13:53] <tumbleweed> ari-tczew: yup
[13:53] <tumbleweed> sorry, got caught up fixing a bug :)
[13:54] <ari-tczew> tumbleweed: so syncs won't go?
[13:54] <tumbleweed> no, uploading sgb sync now
[13:55] <ari-tczew> aha
[13:56] <ari-tczew> Laney: are you going to join core team?
[13:56] <Laney> i've got no plans to do that
[13:56] <sebner> Laney for core-dev \o/
[13:56] <Laney> I've got upload to everything I need
[13:58] <Laney> DD next :)
[13:58] <AnAnt> REVU cannot extract bz2 orig tarballs  ?
[13:59] <sebner> Laney for DD \o/
[13:59] <tumbleweed> AnAnt: it can't excrat source fomat 3, full stop
[13:59] <AnAnt> ah
[13:59] <tumbleweed> still running hardy
[14:00] <AnAnt> ok
[14:01] <ari-tczew> tumbleweed: do you use hardy?
[14:01] <tumbleweed> ari-tczew: no, the box behind REVU does
[14:01] <tumbleweed> ari-tczew: I have boxes running etch, does that count? :)
[14:02] <ari-tczew> tumbleweed: I only ask :P
[14:05] <AnAnt> tumbleweed: would you  review thawab: http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=thawab ?
[14:06] <tumbleweed> I still doesn't have revu advocation rights (any revu admins alive?)
[14:06] <tumbleweed> but I can look
[14:07] <AnAnt> thanks
[14:08] <tumbleweed> AnAnt: I see it's a debian package, waiting for sponsorship?
[14:08] <AnAnt> yup
[14:09] <tumbleweed> aah, our old friend waqf. Have you got any waqf-licenced packages into debian yet?
[14:10] <AnAnt> tumbleweed: you know about it ?
[14:10] <AnAnt> tumbleweed: yes, there are about 2 or 3 packages
[14:10] <tumbleweed> AnAnt: I followed the flamewar, and helped with some of english translation tweaks
[14:12] <ari-tczew> tumbleweed: also masqmail if you could :)
[14:12] <AnAnt> I see
[14:13] <AnAnt> I gotta run now
[14:13] <AnAnt> tumbleweed: looking forward for your review
[14:13] <AnAnt> bye
[15:24] <AnAnt> Hello
[15:25] <AnAnt> tumbleweed: sorry that I had to leave quickly, what translation bits were you talking about ?
[15:28] <tumbleweed> AnAnt: can't remember, something to do with some english wording in debian/copyright on the first waqf package
[15:29] <AnAnt> ah yes
[15:29] <AnAnt> oh, so it was you who suggested to Jakub Wilk ?
[15:31] <tumbleweed> AnAnt: yes :)
[15:31] <AnAnt> thanks
[15:31] <AnAnt> as for the package, it doesn't need to install to public namespace indeed, but that's how upstream does it
[15:32] <AnAnt> can setup.py be modified to install private modules ?
[15:33] <AnAnt> tumbleweed: ^
[15:35] <tumbleweed> AnAnt: yes, you can call it with --install-lib=/usr/share/PACKAGENAME
[15:36] <AnAnt> ah, and how will the app find it ? should I change it somehow ?
[15:37] <tumbleweed> yes, you'll have to either set PYTHONPATH in a wrapper shell script, or insert it into sys.path
[15:39] <AnAnt> as for the doc, I cannot *move* it to /usr/share/doc, but I can create a symlink
[15:40] <tumbleweed> I guess that works
[15:52] <AnAnt> as for the POT thing, I think that's a problem with the release tarball (POT file was not refreshed before tarball release)
[15:53] <AnAnt> tumbleweed: a workaround would be removing the thawab.pot target in po/Makefile
[15:56]  * tumbleweed doesn't know how this is normally dealt with...
[15:56] <ari-tczew> tumbleweed: thanks for syncs. interested in merging? :P
[15:57] <tumbleweed> ari-tczew: yes, I'm working through the queue (but slowly, because I'm watching some debconf talks)
[15:57] <ari-tczew> aha
[15:57] <ari-tczew> ok
[16:23] <AnAnt> tumbleweed: is it that important ?
[16:44] <zooko> Good morning, AnAnt!
[16:48] <tumbleweed> AnAnt: no, there's no simple solution
[16:57] <AnAnt> zooko: evening here
[16:57] <AnAnt> tumbleweed: ok, I re-uploaded
[16:59] <tumbleweed> AnAnt: I see no orig.tar
[16:59] <AnAnt> oh, seems REVU doesn't support diff only re-uploads !
[17:02] <AnAnt> tumbleweed: ok, re-uploaded
[17:14] <AnAnt> debhelper 8 released
[17:15] <ari-tczew> AnAnt: are you going to merge?
[17:22] <highvoltage> whoah I'm still getting used to 7! :p
[17:23] <AnAnt> ari-tczew: I don't mind
[17:24] <ari-tczew> :)
[17:24] <AnAnt> highvoltage: I don't really know yet what's the difference between 7 & 8
[17:32] <zooko> Dear Ubuntu people: where do I go to request that Ubuntu leaders contact someone else and remind them of the code of conduct? I'm thinking of this article, to which I just posted a reply myself: http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2010/08/dude-youre-35-year-old-with-neck-beard.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+d0od+%28Omg!+Ubuntu!%29
[17:33] <zooko> By the way, I totally know this isn't the perfect channel. I guess I'm asking what is the perfect channel.
[17:33] <Laney> there are no leaders to do that
[17:34] <zooko> Really? Mark Shuttleworth's recent blog entry said otherwise: http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/439
[17:34] <maco> you can email the CC
[17:35] <maco> they deal with issues of the members and the CoC
[17:35] <Laney> Where does that say there's an Ubuntu blog police?
[17:35] <maco> Laney: posts on planet must follow the CoC
[17:36] <zooko> More relevant to this channel: AnAnt: here is my first crude attempt at packaging pyutil: http://tahoe-lafs.org/~zooko/pyutil-1.7.9-7.tar.bz2
[17:36] <zooko> Laney: I was thinking of the part that said "When someone who calls herself “an Ubuntu fan” stands up and slates the work of another distro we quietly reach out to that person and point out that it’s not the Ubuntu way of doing things.".
[17:36] <zooko> If there is nobody who wants that job, that's fine with me.
[17:36] <Laney> yes, you can do that yourself :)
[17:36] <maco> Laney: a copy of that post was posted to planet
[17:36] <Laney> it's everybody's job
[17:36] <zooko> I've done my best already, but I thought that someone who's name Benjamin already knew might make him think harder about it.
[17:37] <zooko> That is: someone who he already feels loyal to because they are producing part of the distro that he loves and he already knows them.
[17:37] <zooko> Anyway.
[17:39] <AnAnt> ari-tczew: working on it
[17:39] <ari-tczew> AnAnt: nice!
[17:43] <ari-tczew> tumbleweed: Around?
[17:43] <tumbleweed> yes
[17:43] <highvoltage> zooko: that article is rather unfortunate
[17:44] <ari-tczew> tumbleweed: ah, nothing, nevermind :P
[17:45] <ari-tczew> I'd like to please you sync package, but it;s in main.
[17:45] <tumbleweed> heh
[17:45] <ari-tczew> bdrung: around?
[17:46] <tumbleweed> vish: ping?
[17:46] <vish> tumbleweed: hey
[17:47] <tumbleweed> vish: can I drop two columns of whitespace from the acidrip description?
[17:47] <vish> tumbleweed: sure
[17:47] <zooko> Would anyone like to tell me what is wrong with my packaging of pyutil? http://tahoe-lafs.org/~zooko/pyutil-1.7.9-7.tar.bz2 . Oh, maybe I should go ahead and upload it to REVU?
[17:48] <ari-tczew> zooko: bingo!
[17:49] <AnAnt> zooko: I expect an orig tarball, debdifff & dsc file
[18:18] <oojah> I'm trying to create a package that creates multiple binaries for the first time.
[18:19] <oojah> I want to create a binary package for a shared library and another for a binary that links to the shlib.
[18:20] <oojah> I've added the shlib as a Depends entry for the binary, but when dpkg-shlibdeps runs, it complains it can't find the library.
[18:20] <oojah> Any suggestions one what I might be doing wrong?
[18:21] <AnAnt> ari-tczew: are you a core-dev ?
[18:21] <ari-tczew> AnAnt: no
[18:23] <ari-tczew> AnAnt: propose to ask cjwatson about upload
[18:24] <AnAnt> LP #614787
[18:25] <ari-tczew> tumbleweed: are you still working on sponsors-queue ?
[18:27] <AnAnt> oojah: care to paste the problem in pastebin ?
[18:28] <oojah> AnAnt: The error text, or something more?
[18:28] <tumbleweed> ari-tczew: I took a supper-cooking break
[18:28] <AnAnt> oojah: maybe the whole buildlog ?
[18:30] <ari-tczew> tumbleweed: Today was a rich harvest
[18:33] <oojah> AnAnt: http://pastebin.com/EvDQ8xL2
[18:34] <tumbleweed> ari-tczew: that's because DDs are jumping to get squeeze freeze-exceptions
[18:36] <AnAnt> oojah: are you sure that libmosquitto got installed in the proper package (usually during dh_install)
[18:36] <ari-tczew> tumbleweed: I mean also about syncs. I found yet some possible syncs.
[18:36] <ari-tczew> I thought that everything is only to-merged
[18:41] <oojah> AnAnt: That points me in the right direction - the install file for the library was missing the SO number so wasn't getting picked up.
[18:41] <oojah> Thanks very much.
[18:42] <AnAnt> oojah: usually the lib<whatever>.install has this line:
[18:42] <AnAnt> usr/lib/lib*.so.*
[18:47] <oojah> AnAnt: I meant the name of the install file... :)
[18:47] <M68000> hello
[18:47] <AnAnt> ah
[18:48] <M68000> how do i submit my application for the ubuntu repositories?
[18:49] <ari-tczew> !REVU | M68000
[18:49] <M68000> ill take a look thanks ari-tczew
[18:50] <ari-tczew> in the other way, you can own maintaining package in Debian and then sync to ubuntu
[18:51] <M68000> which method would you recommend?
[18:51] <tumbleweed> ari-tczew: ddd: where's the icon?
[18:52] <ari-tczew> tumbleweed: ddd-3.3.12/ddd.desktop and ddd-3.3.12/icons/ddd.xpm
[18:52] <tumbleweed> ari-tczew: I mean in the binary package
[18:53] <ari-tczew> tumbleweed: hmmm?
[18:53] <tumbleweed> I don't see it in the binary package
[18:54] <ari-tczew> tumbleweed: binary is /debian/ ?
[18:55] <ari-tczew> tumbleweed: do you need a screenshot? :D
 zooko: I expect an orig tarball, debdifff & dsc file
[18:58] <zooko> AnAnt: that is what I provided, in http://tahoe-lafs.org/~zooko/pyutil-1.7.9-7.tar.bz2
[18:58] <AnAnt> zooko: could you upload to REVU please ?
[18:59] <tumbleweed> ari-tczew: http://paste.debian.net/82484/
[19:00] <zooko> AnAnt: ok
[19:03] <ari-tczew> tumbleweed: hmmm, seems to debian/ddd.install is not completed
[19:03] <zooko> Hm, reading https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Packages/REVU makes me wonder if I should instead work on getting pyutil into Debian.
[19:04] <tumbleweed> zooko: yes. maintaining in debian is best
[19:04] <AnAnt> zooko: if you want it in maverick, then I don't advise you to do so, since maverick will feature freeze on Thursday
[19:05] <tumbleweed> what AnAnt says, too
[19:05] <AnAnt> zooko: otherwise, going for Debian is the best path
[19:07] <zooko> Hm, I've logged into REVU but I don't see anyway to upload packages.
[19:07] <zooko> Perhaps I don't have that privilege.
[19:08] <zooko> Oh
[19:08]  * zooko reads the fine https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Packages/REVU
[19:09] <zooko> Nap time. Back in a bit.
[19:10] <AnAnt> dput revu package_version-revision_source.changes
[19:27] <ari-tczew> tumbleweed: 14 sponsorships done :) thanks!
[19:29] <tumbleweed> bdrung still has me by a factor of 2 on hall-of-fame :)
[19:31] <ari-tczew> tumbleweed: btw. bdrung has done ~80 sponsorships for me
[19:31] <tumbleweed> yeah, he's busy like that... :P
[19:33] <ari-tczew> next devel cycle I'm going to open a broadcast our community on Polish LoCo
[19:34] <ari-tczew> maybe this step will bring new contributors
[19:45] <ari-tczew> tumbleweed: do you working on celestia?
[19:46] <tumbleweed> yeah, it's big :)
[19:47] <ari-tczew> tumbleweed: ddd's merge I'll prepare tomorrow.
[19:47] <ari-tczew> I'm going out for beer. see you later
[19:48] <tumbleweed> enjoy
[20:24] <zooko> Is anyone interested in upgrading Tahoe-LAFS for Maverick?
[20:24] <zooko> There is a new stable release of Tahoe-LAFS out with many improvements.
[21:13] <zooko> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tahoe-lafs/+bug/609755
[21:14] <zooko> In a related story: http://identi.ca/notice/45386923 Tahoe-LAFS v1.8.0c1 serves files five times as fast as Tahoe-LAFS v1.7.1 does.