[01:45] <PingJocky> has anyone else noticed that rhythmbox no longer supports mt-daapd servers?
[07:04] <Traveler8> hey guys i have toshiba a505 im trying alpha 3 but cant get it to boot...i have tried alpha 2 before and it was working
[07:04] <Traveler8> anyone can help?
[07:05] <Traveler8> no one?
[07:05] <Traveler8> hey guys i have toshiba a505 im trying alpha 3 but cant get it to boot...i have tried alpha 2 before and it was working
[07:07] <Traveler8> !\?
[08:06]  * C-S-B_ C-S-B
[10:02] <brotatos> so how's maverick?
[10:02] <brotatos> 64-bit versions doing all right?
[10:04] <jenkins> has the really slow disc check been fixed in maverick? In lucid it is very slow after 70%
[11:12] <yofel_> oh joy, xserver 1.9 at the door ^^ https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/2010-August/011962.html
[11:12] <[4-tea-2]> I'm clutching at straws: Anyone here using Logitech's Squeeze* stuff and managed to build SqueezePlay for MM?
[12:34] <gnomefreak> anyone know if 2.6.35.14+nvidia  workin gyet?
[12:34] <gnomefreak> yet
[12:35] <yofel> nvidia 256.44 and 2.6.35 still work completely fine for me.. you're not using edgers?
[12:36] <yofel> 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation GT218 [NVS 3100M] (rev a2)
[12:45] <gnomefreak> nope no edgers
[12:46] <gnomefreak> im using nvidia card 6200. drivers: 256.35-0ubuntu2
[12:47] <gnomefreak> upgrading kernel to *.14
[12:48]  * gnomefreak going to lay down while this is upgrading
[13:43] <LucidFox> Okay, after the last updates, my Nautilus desktop is now plain white, no matter what background I choose
[13:43] <LucidFox> any ideas?
[14:29] <knittl> anybody else experiencing memory leaks with indicator applet?
[14:30] <Ian_corne> Anyone else running with an ati HD 4870?
[14:43] <knittl> hrm. everytime a notification bubble pops up memory usage of process indicator-applet goes up by 0.1 – 0.8 mb
[14:44] <knittl> especially with rhythmbox
[14:47] <Ian_corne> doesn't seem to do that with me
[14:48] <knittl> with rhythmbox notifs it's pretty stable at 0.75 mb
[14:48] <knittl> pidgin notifs only add little memory; probably 0.05 mb
[16:11] <allu2> hello i'm trying to upgrade to 10.10 following this http://www.webupd8.org/2010/05/how-to-upgrade-to-ubuntu-1010-maverick.html but the second step doesn't work and gives me...
[16:11] <allu2> http://pastebin.com/9P8A0QS8
[16:12] <allu2> so now i have finished the first and got stuck in secodn, i'm not sure if it's save to reboot, i don't want to end up not being able to login...
[16:12] <Pici> allu2: What version of Ubuntu are you running now?
[16:13] <allu2> 10.04
[16:14] <Pici> allu2: virtualbox-3.1 is not a package in any Ubuntu release.  It looks like dpkg is failing for some reason due to a third party package that you have installed.  If possible, I'd try to remove that package and then re-run the upgrade.
[16:14] <allu2> Pici, ah ok :)
[16:15] <allu2> Pici, hum can't remove it
[16:15] <allu2> Pici, i get same error when i try
[16:18] <allu2> what should i do :S
[16:18] <allu2> it also seems i don't have dpkg fully installed :O
[16:18] <Pici> uh.
[16:20] <allu2> hum
[16:20] <ZykoticK9> !search lndir
[16:21] <Ian_corne> allu2:
[16:21] <Ian_corne> go to the file
[16:21] <Ian_corne> and delete the entry for virtualbox
[16:22] <Ian_corne> rinse and repeat
[16:26] <allu2> solved: it was enought when you remove the _Ubuntu_karmic  from the end of the version on /var/lib/dpkg/available and /var/lib/dpkg/status
[16:27] <Ian_corne> ok :p
[16:28] <allu2> :)
[17:49] <neeraj> I installed maverick on external HD and now facing ALERT! /dev/disk/by-uuid error.
[17:50] <neeraj> I searched about it on net too.. Want to ask is there ny way that I don't encounter this error in future.
[17:51] <neeraj> Also, If someone can tell me why exactly we face this error, then I will be very grateful :)
[18:33] <sinurge> am gettting an error while upgrading to maverick from lucid Dist-upgrade failed: 'E:Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be caused by held packages.'
[18:33] <sinurge> any chance of knowing what the error might be
[18:52] <sinurge> bump
[19:10] <sinurge> anyone here?
[19:12] <Pici> sinurge: Yes.
[19:12] <Pici> sinurge: How are you upgrading?
[19:14] <sinurge> from alt+F2 update-manager -d
[19:14] <sinurge>  'E:Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be caused by held packages.'
[19:14] <sinurge> ran apt-get update, upgrade, and dist-upgrade got nothing
[19:14] <sinurge> but saw a wierd error in var/log/
[19:16] <sinurge> in apt.log , Package xserver-xorg-video-i740 has broken Depends on xorg-video-abi-7.0
[19:17] <sinurge> seems like broken dependencies but am not sure how to fix them
[19:20] <Daekdroom> sinurge, I think they're updating xorg-server version to 1.9
[19:21] <sinurge> meaning .. i gotta wait ?
[19:21] <Daekdroom> I suppose.
[19:22] <Daekdroom> MaverickChanges log is getting pretty much spammed with "Rebuild against xserver 1.9 ABI" entries xD
[19:25] <sinurge> hmm seems like a good idea
[19:25] <sinurge> anyways someday i had to ask this...what does downgrading package mean and how does one do it
[20:07] <mhb> how to uprade ubuntu 10.4 to 10.10
[20:09] <mhb> how to uprade ubuntu 10.4 to 10.10
[20:10] <Pici> mhb: update-manager -d, or do-release upgrade -d.  See http://www.ubuntu.com/testing/maverick/alpha3 for more information please.
[20:10] <Pici> mhb: Someone reported earlier that they had issues, possibly due to a blocked package.
[20:17] <kim0> anyone here updated to latest, using chrome/chromium ?
[20:17] <vish> Pici: does the topic need an update? is glib still broken?
[20:17] <kim0> for me gmail hangs consistently
[20:17] <kim0> different chrome versions .. I'm starting to doubt it's a maverick update
[20:18] <Pici> kim0: It was working for earlier today.
[20:18] <kim0> Pici: can u dist-upgrade to latest ?
[20:18] <vish> Pici: thanks :)
[20:18] <Pici> kim0: I'm not at that computer at the moment.
[20:18] <kim0> ok
[20:28] <kim0> anyone else using chrome/chromium on maverick dist-upgraded to latest and can confirm it works fine ?
[20:29] <IdleOne> chomium is running fine here
[20:30] <IdleOne> what is it you are seeing exactly?
[21:12] <Ian_corne> hope the xserver mess is resolved quickly :)
[22:04] <notlistening> Xorg died after the latest updates anyone else?
[22:05] <Daekdroom> notlistening, pretty much everyone... they're halfway through updating to xserver 1.9 ABI
[22:06] <notlistening> lol okay :D
[22:09] <notlistening> from the command line how do i get apt-get to pull in depenandacies automaticaly?
[22:10] <Daekdroom> notlistening, it's not that easy, you have to keep upgrading untill it suddenly starts working again. If you're using a closed source driver, you'll definitely have to remove that
[22:10] <notlistening> I understand it is not that easy but that question has been bugging me for a bit aswell
[22:11] <notlistening> I have only got is running on a virtualbox machhne
[22:11] <Daekdroom> in *theory*, and in most real life cases, apt-get will automatically pull all the avaiable dependencies.
[22:11] <notlistening> oh there you go then wait it is on this one :D
[22:12] <notlistening> dpkg ...?
[22:14] <notlistening> nice to see such a good test community
[22:16] <BUGabundo> evening
[22:16] <yofel> hi
[22:24] <zezu> does maverick installer use lvm1 for software raid (0/stripe)  partitions during alt. install partition setup ?
[22:25] <zezu> b/c I can't see that there are any pv/vg/lv's  but yet in disk manager for md0  i see there are separate volumes ...  are these md volumes and not lvm ... just disk part type is lvm  ... or are these legacy lvm volumes ?
[22:31] <patdk-wk> those would be md volumes
[22:32] <patdk-wk> nothing to do with lvm at all
[22:32] <patdk-wk> and ubuntu hasn't used lvm1 for as long as I can remember, it's all lvm2
[22:34] <zezu> yes was just reading more on that ,,  thanks much patdk-wk ... trying to figure out what the easiest / fastest way of redoing this is ... I want to use separate partitions on the disks or something windows can work with as well
[22:35] <patdk-wk> not going to happen
[22:35] <zezu> well
[22:35] <patdk-wk> unless you use dm-raid
[22:36] <patdk-wk> and your computer supports hardware or software raid controller
[22:37] <zezu> Really?  I read something about lvm supporting windows dynamic disks and software raid now ... i figure if I manually partition the drives and manually create volumes for linux,  and then add the windows dynamic volumes it should work
[22:38] <zezu> I know with dm-raid and the old fake raid (if it was supported by dm-raid) it would work
[22:38] <zezu> but i'm trying to stick w/ pure software raid rather than the proprietary crap for compibility reasons ...
[22:40] <allu2> Hello, anyone got any idea of installing acx111 drivers on 10.10?
[22:51] <high-rez> For some reason xorg won't install for me... It says: xserver-xorg : Depends: xserver-xorg-input-all but it is not going to be installed or xserver-xorg-input-9
[22:54] <high-rez> Weird, it looks like there's a circular dependency going on here,.
[22:56] <Volkodav> yeah - it wants to remove all xorg on upgrade
[22:57] <high-rez> Volkodav: yeah, which i told it to go ahead and do.  :)  firguring on the next round of dist-upgrade it'd resolve its dependncy issues.
[22:58] <high-rez> It appears if I could just delete the requirement to support the wacom tablet stuff I'd be ok
[23:00] <PingJocky> funny i had the same issue the other day...
[23:00] <PingJocky> with x that is
[23:01] <Volkodav> yeah but - you can reboot until you install the new packages for xserver
[23:01] <BUGabundo> damn it
[23:01] <Volkodav> mine wants to remove all of them
[23:02] <BUGabundo> second crash/freeze
[23:02] <BUGabundo> needed power cycle again
[23:02] <BUGabundo> stupid ati
[23:02] <BUGabundo> guess its time to get a daily and retest
[23:13] <Volkodav> I did this 'huge remove x-server' upgrade too
[23:14] <Volkodav> see what happens on reboot lol :-D
[23:16] <ChogyDan> Volkodav: noooo!~!!!
[23:16] <ChogyDan> :p
[23:20] <Volkodav> yeah I did
[23:20] <Volkodav> but will not reboot for now
[23:20] <Volkodav> till new portion comes in
[23:20] <Daekdroom> I'm using xorg-edgers, so I'm alright
[23:20] <BUGabundo>  1157   0.08s   0.48s     0K     0K     0K     0K  --   - S  27% Xorg
[23:21] <BUGabundo> X using 27% CPU ???
[23:21] <BUGabundo> doing NOTHING ?
[23:28] <Daekdroom> memory leakage and CPU cycle waste are the worst things ever :|
[23:28] <Daekdroom> fortunately, the only memory leakage I'm facing is nautilus
[23:31] <yofel> I wonder what's up with thunderbird memory usage, just because I'm using it for a day isn't a reason it's using ~240MiB ...