| bdrung | Laney: not sortable sponsor queue -> adblock plus? | 00:31 |
|---|---|---|
| Laney | yeah i do have that on | 00:31 |
| Laney | seems weird though | 00:31 |
| bdrung | Laney: whitelist everything on this page | 00:33 |
| bdrung | micahg: mozilla package set -> ubufox sponsoring (3 bugs) | 00:33 |
| Laney | that works | 00:33 |
| Laney | cheers | 00:33 |
| micahg | bdrung: only 1 I can do | 00:36 |
| micahg | and it's not really complete | 00:36 |
| bdrung | micahg: start small | 00:36 |
| micahg | I'll look at it again | 00:37 |
| bdrung | tumbleweed: i raised the bar by ~ 5 :) | 00:37 |
| micahg | bdrung: the script doesn't take into account which series one can upload to | 00:38 |
| micahg | bdrung: I haven't done it because chrisccoulson is planning an upload of ubufox, so I left it for him | 00:47 |
| micahg | bdrung: PM? | 01:17 |
| highvoltage | moo | 02:08 |
| micahg | highvoltage: builders empty for grazing packages :) | 02:15 |
| highvoltage | I have some packages to fix but I don't have the energy for them now :) | 02:23 |
| ajmitch | it's not like it's late there, right? | 02:23 |
| highvoltage | ajmitch: 21:35, but I have to be up at 4:00 to take someone to the airport | 02:35 |
| highvoltage | (in eastern canada atm, not south africa :) ) | 02:36 |
| ajmitch | highvoltage: aha :) | 02:40 |
| === Laibsch1 is now known as Laibsch | ||
| zooko | Greetings, people of #ubuntu-motu! | 02:48 |
| zooko | We Tahoe-LAFS hackers moved up the release date of Tahoe-LAFS v1.8.0 to Wed, Aug 11 in the hopes of getting it included in Maverick. | 02:50 |
| ajmitch | zooko: still no progress on getting them into debian as well? | 02:59 |
| === echidnaman is now known as JontheEchidna | ||
| zooko | ajmitch: no, no recent progress on getting Tahoe-LAFS into Debian. | 03:10 |
| zooko | ajmitch: but Tahoe-LAFS v1.8.0 offers some pretty dramatic performance, feature, and bugfix improvements over the v1.6.1 that is currently in Ubuntu. | 03:20 |
| zooko | ajmitch: http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/browser/trunk/NEWS | 03:23 |
| === Laibsch1 is now known as Laibsch | ||
| * Rhonda cries out loud, https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/600100 | 07:20 | |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 600100 in lucid-backports "Please backport wesnoth-1.8 (1:1.8.2-1/universe)" [Undecided,Invalid] | 07:20 |
| ajmitch | invalid? | 07:20 |
| Rhonda | I *explicitly* asked about wether it might go in through a stable release update! | 07:20 |
| ajmitch | confusion reigns | 07:21 |
| Rhonda | And was told that there isn't a way. No I receive an invalid for the backports request?! | 07:21 |
| Rhonda | Sorry, but this is winding me up. :/ | 07:21 |
| ajmitch | bugs aren't serious enough for a SRU, and because they're bugs, no backports | 07:21 |
| ajmitch | yay for worshipping the process | 07:21 |
| Rhonda | I would be *more* than happy to have it go in through a SRU, but then, being told that it won't happen I do the other way that makes it possible to offer it, and now this. :'( | 07:22 |
| ajmitch | I can understand why you'd be annoyed | 07:22 |
| Rhonda | And wouldn't a SRU has to go through a bugreport in launchpad, too? | 07:23 |
| ajmitch | yes | 07:24 |
| Rhonda | Why not reassign it appropriately instead of marking it invalid, then? | 07:24 |
| ajmitch | and requires eyballing of the diff | 07:24 |
| Rhonda | This is so shooting the effort down the drain. :( | 07:24 |
| ajmitch | because it would still be an invalid task in lucid-backports | 07:24 |
| Rhonda | Ah, alright. | 07:24 |
| ajmitch | same bug can be used, just needs a task against wesnoth in ubuntu, targetted to lucid | 07:24 |
| ajmitch | & why not 1.8.3? :) | 07:25 |
| Rhonda | Right, should get updated to that. Thanks for the reminder. | 07:30 |
| Rhonda | Actually I potential would need to bump it to 1.8.4 in a week or two week's time anyway. | 07:31 |
| Rhonda | And it's definitely not invalid for karmic, there never was a wesnoth-1.8 package in karmic. | 07:31 |
| Rhonda | The SRU team would only laugh madly at me filing a SRU request for wesnoth-1.8 to karmic. | 07:32 |
| Rhonda | stalcup: ^^ - can you please take a look, with sugar on top? | 07:33 |
| dholbach | good morning | 07:57 |
| ajmitch | morning dholbach | 08:04 |
| dholbach | hey ajmitch | 08:05 |
| jdong | stalcup / Rhonda: as a bag of bug fixes new release that was rejected az. | 08:14 |
| jdong | Err | 08:14 |
| jdong | as a SRU, I think it's a good backports candidate | 08:14 |
| jdong | And all those typos means a sleepy jdong | 08:15 |
| maco | jdong: and no wonder, given the timezone we're in! | 08:15 |
| jdong | Hey, why are you still up? :) | 08:15 |
| maco | im up because im a stupid college student who still hasnt gotten it through her head that getting up for work requires going to bed at a decent time | 08:16 |
| Rhonda | jdong: I still am not clear what you mean. :P So would you think it does indeed make a good SRU candidate, or not? | 08:16 |
| jdong | Rhonda: No i mean it's a good backports candidate and was rejected in error | 08:17 |
| huats | morning | 09:19 |
| Rhonda | jdong: Can you set it back to new then, I don't want to be involved in status ping-pongs. %-/ | 09:32 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| Laney | jdong or ScottK: Could I be added to backporters? | 11:47 |
| micahg | dholbach: would a bzr merge work better for a new upstream version? | 12:01 |
| micahg | actually, I'm not sure how to do that | 12:01 |
| tumbleweed | micahg: bzr merge-upstream? (if you are talking about new upstream versions, not via debian). And yes, that does make for easier reviewing than people attaching tarballs to bugs | 12:17 |
| micahg | tumbleweed: yeah, idk how to do that yet | 12:17 |
| tumbleweed | micahg: bzr merge-upstream --version=$VERSON --distribution=maverick $TARBALL | 12:18 |
| hyperair | debfx: ping | 12:29 |
| hyperair | debfx: i'm looking at this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wormux/+bug/541078 | 12:30 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 541078 in wormux (Ubuntu) "Upgrade to version 0.9.2.1" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 12:30 |
| hyperair | and i was wondering, why don't you replace the config.guess and config.sub files? | 12:30 |
| debfx | hyperair: dh_autoreconf replaces them | 12:33 |
| hyperair | debfx: ah, it does, eh. | 12:33 |
| hyperair | i'm not familiar with dh-autoreconf, actually. | 12:33 |
| hyperair | part of the new debhelper, i suppose. | 12:34 |
| micahg | tumbleweed: k, now do I ask for reviewer from -sponsors? | 12:35 |
| debfx | it's a fairly new package (dh-autoreconf) but should work with all debhelper/cdbs versions | 12:35 |
| tumbleweed | micahg: propose it for merging, it'll appear in the sponosr queue | 12:35 |
| * micahg didn't close the bug right in bzr..trying again | 12:36 | |
| tumbleweed | debcommit should do the right thing | 12:36 |
| * micahg didn't use debcommit since I already used it for the commit before | 12:37 | |
| micahg | tumbleweed: fixed it, just used debcommit -e :) | 12:38 |
| hyperair | debfx: yes, i see. okay, let me continue looking. | 12:39 |
| dholbach | micahg: that'd work too | 12:40 |
| micahg | dholbach: bzr merge ready :) | 12:40 |
| micahg | tumbleweed: thanks for your help | 12:41 |
| dholbach | micahg: I'm going to be a bit busy today, if nobody beats me to it, I'll have a look tomorrow morning | 12:41 |
| micahg | dholbach: k, thanks | 12:41 |
| micahg | dholbach: if a bug has a patch and bzr branch, both show up on the sponsoring page | 12:42 |
| dholbach | micahg: if you do a merge, no need to file a bug | 12:44 |
| hyperair | debfx: i noticed you dropped README from debian/docs, which looks like it might be useful. | 12:44 |
| * micahg thought tracking bugs were always a good thing | 12:45 | |
| debfx | hyperair: the README is in wormux.docs | 13:12 |
| hyperair | debfx: ah, i must have missed it, sorry. | 13:13 |
| === CieD is now known as Ciemon | ||
| hyperair | debfx: you're missing entries in debian/copyright for vlgothic. | 14:18 |
| hyperair | debfx: add those and i'll upload | 14:18 |
| stalcup | 18 | 14:57 |
| debfx | hyperair: done, thanks for reviewing the package :) | 15:07 |
| hyperair | debfx: sure =) | 15:07 |
| LucidFox | http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/gmail-notifier <-- do we really need *another* gmail notifier for GNOME? | 16:02 |
| LucidFox | we have like 5 already | 16:02 |
| directhex | LucidFox, but the other ones are *wrong*! | 16:45 |
| nigelb | ok, folks! We (Maia and me) need your help. We're re-branding "Behind MOTU" since everyone in ~ubuntu-dev would be included. We'd like your suggestions for name! | 17:05 |
| hyperair | argh. | 17:14 |
| hyperair | dput finally reached 97343k/97344k of this 90M tarball crawling at 30k/s | 17:15 |
| hyperair | and then | 17:15 |
| hyperair | it hung. | 17:15 |
| * hyperair facepalms | 17:15 | |
| hyperair | whyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy | 17:15 |
| hyperair | why does this happen to me? | 17:15 |
| \sh | hyperair: the karma ;) | 17:17 |
| * hyperair weeps | 17:17 | |
| Laney | hyperair: you should use sftp | 17:18 |
| Laney | it won't have that problem | 17:18 |
| hyperair | Laney: eh? | 17:18 |
| * hyperair tries | 17:18 | |
| Rhonda | stalcup: I should have mentioned that I was guided there after a SRU discussion, right. | 17:20 |
| stalcup | Rhonda: that would have been helpful :) although I jumped to conclusions as well | 17:26 |
| Rhonda | I *think* I did a test in karmic back then as well, but will try so tomorrow again when I am at the place with my chroots. | 17:27 |
| stalcup | coolio | 17:28 |
| Rhonda | Given that 1.8 is already in karmic-backports and the development since then is on a stable branch upstream wise so only translation/bugfixes go in, I though don't expect 1.8.3 to be any different here. | 17:29 |
| Rhonda | But for completeness (and to please my own perfectionist approach) I will give it a shot just to be sure | 17:29 |
| stalcup | :) | 17:30 |
| stalcup | excellent | 17:30 |
| hyperair | debfx: uploaded. | 18:58 |
| stalcup | Rhonda: ScottK approved your lucid request, care to comment on your package in karmic? | 18:59 |
| Rhonda | Like said, can do that tomorrow. :) | 19:11 |
| Rhonda | Two hours doesn't make the day change over here, mind you. :P | 19:11 |
| stalcup | Rhonda: it's still morning where I am :) | 19:14 |
| Rhonda | See, day hasn't even changed for you. ;) | 19:16 |
| ari-tczew | Laney: thanks for sponsoring ; O | 19:17 |
| Laney | np | 19:18 |
| ari-tczew | Laney: just you don't need to set status manually if debian/changelog includes LP: # tag | 19:19 |
| Laney | I know. | 19:19 |
| Rhonda | Where are the metting logs again in the wiki? | 19:36 |
| Rhonda | Ah, I think I just found me a search pattern. | 19:36 |
| geser | for which meeting? | 19:36 |
| Rhonda | Found it ^^ | 19:37 |
| fabrice_sp | jtb is waiting in binary new, and this is blocking 4 syncs to get josm at the latest version. Taking into account that FF is around the corner, should I poke an archive admin to get it approved ASAP? | 20:17 |
| fabrice_sp | or should I request a FFe right now ? :-) | 20:17 |
| geser | fabrice_sp: if you know that josm will build after the 4 syncs, why not requests sync for all needed packages now? and deal with the build ordering (if necessary) later | 20:20 |
| fabrice_sp | geser, right. I forgot about that! tbh, I'm releuctant to upload something that will FTBFS. I'll upload it to my ppa before. Thanks! | 20:21 |
| ari-tczew | tumbleweed: ping | 20:29 |
| tumbleweed | ari-tczew: pong | 20:30 |
| ari-tczew | tumbleweed: hello, what's the command for verbose files in .deb (binary)? | 20:31 |
| tumbleweed | dpkg-deb -c ? | 20:32 |
| tumbleweed | (or debc for a binary changes file) | 20:32 |
| ari-tczew | tumbleweed: I'll prepare a patch for ddd package, which misses .xpm install | 20:32 |
| tumbleweed | cool. please forward to debian (obviously) | 20:33 |
| === Laibsch1 is now known as Laibsch | ||
| ari-tczew | could someone check whether it can be sync'd? the delta for ssl-cert package reffering to jaunty. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ssl-cert/+changelog | 21:34 |
| geser | ari-tczew: what's your opinion? | 21:39 |
| ari-tczew | geser: the delta is reffering to upgrade packages in jaunty, but jaunty is very old release | 21:41 |
| ari-tczew | I'd drop the changes, but I'm not 100% sure | 21:41 |
| geser | because a delta is old, it doesn't automatically mean it can be dropped | 21:42 |
| ari-tczew | geser: I don't said delta is old, just affected release is old | 21:42 |
| ari-tczew | geser: what's your opinion? | 21:43 |
| geser | then I misunderstood you | 21:43 |
| geser | and I agree that it can be dropped, openssl-blacklist got moved to suggest in the Debian package and the upgrade notice should be a non-issue now | 21:44 |
| ari-tczew | geser: that's right | 21:45 |
| Laibsch | Is REVU still the place for sponsorship requests? | 21:57 |
| Laibsch | it doesn't seem to process my uploads | 21:57 |
| micahg | Laibsch: REVU doesn't process, people process things in REVU | 21:58 |
| Laibsch | micahg: not quite correct ;-) | 21:58 |
| Laibsch | the server needs to process the upload to show it | 21:58 |
| Laibsch | mine doesn't show up in the list | 21:59 |
| Laibsch | uploaded it yesterday and today | 21:59 |
| micahg | Laibsch: are you referring to an existing package or a new package? | 21:59 |
| Laibsch | new package | 21:59 |
| Laibsch | natspec | 21:59 |
| micahg | oh, yeah, well then... | 21:59 |
| Laibsch | where is the place now? | 21:59 |
| micahg | Laibsch: same place, just lack of REVUers :) | 21:59 |
| Laibsch | OK | 22:00 |
| Laibsch | that's kind of unchanged ;-) | 22:00 |
| Laibsch | but again, the server doesn't even process my package | 22:00 |
| Laibsch | it doesn't show up in the list | 22:00 |
| micahg | Laibsch: is it debian 545151 | 22:00 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 545151 in wnpp "ITP: libnatspec -- a library for national and language-specific issues" [Wishlist,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/545151 | 22:00 |
| Laibsch | yes, that's the one | 22:00 |
| Laibsch | and there is a bug in LP as well | 22:00 |
| Laibsch | about unzip and encoding issues | 22:01 |
| micahg | Laibsch: so, getting into debian would be ideal, have you tried that route? | 22:01 |
| Laibsch | do you remember my nick | 22:01 |
| Laibsch | ? | 22:01 |
| Laibsch | no need to always start with the basics ;-) | 22:01 |
| Laibsch | Yes, I'm maintaining a number of packages in Debian already | 22:02 |
| Laibsch | and the upload to Debian is in progress | 22:02 |
| micahg | Laibsch: are you just trying to get in Maverick before FF? | 22:02 |
| Laibsch | but that won't be in time for maverick (at least most likely it won't) | 22:02 |
| Laibsch | kind of | 22:02 |
| Laibsch | DIF | 22:02 |
| Laibsch | no? | 22:02 |
| Laibsch | and I think we're already past DIF | 22:03 |
| micahg | k, I should probably stop now since I'm not helping here... | 22:03 |
| * micahg will bbiab | 22:03 | |
| * micahg can't REVU anyways | 22:03 | |
| Laibsch | but maybe you can help me find out why the darn server won't process my uploads | 22:03 |
| Laibsch | :-/ | 22:04 |
| ari-tczew | tumbleweed: ddd patch updated | 22:07 |
| micahg | Laibsch1: idk, I see the upload, but it says there was an issue and idk who admins REVU | 22:19 |
| Laibsch1 | some special restricted-access area? | 22:20 |
| Laibsch1 | because I don't see anything | 22:20 |
| Laibsch1 | and I did not get a mail about it, eithr | 22:20 |
| micahg | Laibsch1: http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?upid=8500 | 22:20 |
| Laibsch1 | it's now showing in the list, too | 22:21 |
| === Laibsch1 is now known as Laibsch | ||
| Laibsch | thanks | 22:21 |
| ari-tczew | bdrung: could you sync this one? bug 614210 it's necessary for some packages to merge | 23:02 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 614210 in javatools (Ubuntu) "Sync javatools 0.32 (main) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/614210 | 23:02 |
| === Laibsch1 is now known as Laibsch | ||
| siretart | 23:56 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!