[00:31] Laney: not sortable sponsor queue -> adblock plus? [00:31] yeah i do have that on [00:31] seems weird though [00:33] Laney: whitelist everything on this page [00:33] micahg: mozilla package set -> ubufox sponsoring (3 bugs) [00:33] that works [00:33] cheers [00:36] bdrung: only 1 I can do [00:36] and it's not really complete [00:36] micahg: start small [00:37] I'll look at it again [00:37] tumbleweed: i raised the bar by ~ 5 :) [00:38] bdrung: the script doesn't take into account which series one can upload to [00:47] bdrung: I haven't done it because chrisccoulson is planning an upload of ubufox, so I left it for him [01:17] bdrung: PM? [02:08] moo [02:15] highvoltage: builders empty for grazing packages :) [02:23] I have some packages to fix but I don't have the energy for them now :) [02:23] it's not like it's late there, right? [02:35] ajmitch: 21:35, but I have to be up at 4:00 to take someone to the airport [02:36] (in eastern canada atm, not south africa :) ) [02:40] highvoltage: aha :) === Laibsch1 is now known as Laibsch [02:48] Greetings, people of #ubuntu-motu! [02:50] We Tahoe-LAFS hackers moved up the release date of Tahoe-LAFS v1.8.0 to Wed, Aug 11 in the hopes of getting it included in Maverick. [02:59] zooko: still no progress on getting them into debian as well? === echidnaman is now known as JontheEchidna [03:10] ajmitch: no, no recent progress on getting Tahoe-LAFS into Debian. [03:20] ajmitch: but Tahoe-LAFS v1.8.0 offers some pretty dramatic performance, feature, and bugfix improvements over the v1.6.1 that is currently in Ubuntu. [03:23] ajmitch: http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/browser/trunk/NEWS === Laibsch1 is now known as Laibsch [07:20] * Rhonda cries out loud, https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/600100 [07:20] Launchpad bug 600100 in lucid-backports "Please backport wesnoth-1.8 (1:1.8.2-1/universe)" [Undecided,Invalid] [07:20] invalid? [07:20] I *explicitly* asked about wether it might go in through a stable release update! [07:21] confusion reigns [07:21] And was told that there isn't a way. No I receive an invalid for the backports request?! [07:21] Sorry, but this is winding me up. :/ [07:21] bugs aren't serious enough for a SRU, and because they're bugs, no backports [07:21] yay for worshipping the process [07:22] I would be *more* than happy to have it go in through a SRU, but then, being told that it won't happen I do the other way that makes it possible to offer it, and now this. :'( [07:22] I can understand why you'd be annoyed [07:23] And wouldn't a SRU has to go through a bugreport in launchpad, too? [07:24] yes [07:24] Why not reassign it appropriately instead of marking it invalid, then? [07:24] and requires eyballing of the diff [07:24] This is so shooting the effort down the drain. :( [07:24] because it would still be an invalid task in lucid-backports [07:24] Ah, alright. [07:24] same bug can be used, just needs a task against wesnoth in ubuntu, targetted to lucid [07:25] & why not 1.8.3? :) [07:30] Right, should get updated to that. Thanks for the reminder. [07:31] Actually I potential would need to bump it to 1.8.4 in a week or two week's time anyway. [07:31] And it's definitely not invalid for karmic, there never was a wesnoth-1.8 package in karmic. [07:32] The SRU team would only laugh madly at me filing a SRU request for wesnoth-1.8 to karmic. [07:33] stalcup: ^^ - can you please take a look, with sugar on top? [07:57] good morning [08:04] morning dholbach [08:05] hey ajmitch [08:14] stalcup / Rhonda: as a bag of bug fixes new release that was rejected az. [08:14] Err [08:14] as a SRU, I think it's a good backports candidate [08:15] And all those typos means a sleepy jdong [08:15] jdong: and no wonder, given the timezone we're in! [08:15] Hey, why are you still up? :) [08:16] im up because im a stupid college student who still hasnt gotten it through her head that getting up for work requires going to bed at a decent time [08:16] jdong: I still am not clear what you mean. :P So would you think it does indeed make a good SRU candidate, or not? [08:17] Rhonda: No i mean it's a good backports candidate and was rejected in error [09:19] morning [09:32] jdong: Can you set it back to new then, I don't want to be involved in status ping-pongs. %-/ === yofel_ is now known as yofel [11:47] jdong or ScottK: Could I be added to backporters? [12:01] dholbach: would a bzr merge work better for a new upstream version? [12:01] actually, I'm not sure how to do that [12:17] micahg: bzr merge-upstream? (if you are talking about new upstream versions, not via debian). And yes, that does make for easier reviewing than people attaching tarballs to bugs [12:17] tumbleweed: yeah, idk how to do that yet [12:18] micahg: bzr merge-upstream --version=$VERSON --distribution=maverick $TARBALL [12:29] debfx: ping [12:30] debfx: i'm looking at this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wormux/+bug/541078 [12:30] Launchpad bug 541078 in wormux (Ubuntu) "Upgrade to version 0.9.2.1" [Undecided,Confirmed] [12:30] and i was wondering, why don't you replace the config.guess and config.sub files? [12:33] hyperair: dh_autoreconf replaces them [12:33] debfx: ah, it does, eh. [12:33] i'm not familiar with dh-autoreconf, actually. [12:34] part of the new debhelper, i suppose. [12:35] tumbleweed: k, now do I ask for reviewer from -sponsors? [12:35] it's a fairly new package (dh-autoreconf) but should work with all debhelper/cdbs versions [12:35] micahg: propose it for merging, it'll appear in the sponosr queue [12:36] * micahg didn't close the bug right in bzr..trying again [12:36] debcommit should do the right thing [12:37] * micahg didn't use debcommit since I already used it for the commit before [12:38] tumbleweed: fixed it, just used debcommit -e :) [12:39] debfx: yes, i see. okay, let me continue looking. [12:40] micahg: that'd work too [12:40] dholbach: bzr merge ready :) [12:41] tumbleweed: thanks for your help [12:41] micahg: I'm going to be a bit busy today, if nobody beats me to it, I'll have a look tomorrow morning [12:41] dholbach: k, thanks [12:42] dholbach: if a bug has a patch and bzr branch, both show up on the sponsoring page [12:44] micahg: if you do a merge, no need to file a bug [12:44] debfx: i noticed you dropped README from debian/docs, which looks like it might be useful. [12:45] * micahg thought tracking bugs were always a good thing [13:12] hyperair: the README is in wormux.docs [13:13] debfx: ah, i must have missed it, sorry. === CieD is now known as Ciemon [14:18] debfx: you're missing entries in debian/copyright for vlgothic. [14:18] debfx: add those and i'll upload [14:57] 18 [15:07] hyperair: done, thanks for reviewing the package :) [15:07] debfx: sure =) [16:02] http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/gmail-notifier <-- do we really need *another* gmail notifier for GNOME? [16:02] we have like 5 already [16:45] LucidFox, but the other ones are *wrong*! [17:05] ok, folks! We (Maia and me) need your help. We're re-branding "Behind MOTU" since everyone in ~ubuntu-dev would be included. We'd like your suggestions for name! [17:14] argh. [17:15] dput finally reached 97343k/97344k of this 90M tarball crawling at 30k/s [17:15] and then [17:15] it hung. [17:15] * hyperair facepalms [17:15] whyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy [17:15] why does this happen to me? [17:17] <\sh> hyperair: the karma ;) [17:17] * hyperair weeps [17:18] hyperair: you should use sftp [17:18] it won't have that problem [17:18] Laney: eh? [17:18] * hyperair tries [17:20] stalcup: I should have mentioned that I was guided there after a SRU discussion, right. [17:26] Rhonda: that would have been helpful :) although I jumped to conclusions as well [17:27] I *think* I did a test in karmic back then as well, but will try so tomorrow again when I am at the place with my chroots. [17:28] coolio [17:29] Given that 1.8 is already in karmic-backports and the development since then is on a stable branch upstream wise so only translation/bugfixes go in, I though don't expect 1.8.3 to be any different here. [17:29] But for completeness (and to please my own perfectionist approach) I will give it a shot just to be sure [17:30] :) [17:30] excellent [18:58] debfx: uploaded. [18:59] Rhonda: ScottK approved your lucid request, care to comment on your package in karmic? [19:11] Like said, can do that tomorrow. :) [19:11] Two hours doesn't make the day change over here, mind you. :P [19:14] Rhonda: it's still morning where I am :) [19:16] See, day hasn't even changed for you. ;) [19:17] Laney: thanks for sponsoring ; O [19:18] np [19:19] Laney: just you don't need to set status manually if debian/changelog includes LP: # tag [19:19] I know. [19:36] Where are the metting logs again in the wiki? [19:36] Ah, I think I just found me a search pattern. [19:36] for which meeting? [19:37] Found it ^^ [20:17] jtb is waiting in binary new, and this is blocking 4 syncs to get josm at the latest version. Taking into account that FF is around the corner, should I poke an archive admin to get it approved ASAP? [20:17] or should I request a FFe right now ? :-) [20:20] fabrice_sp: if you know that josm will build after the 4 syncs, why not requests sync for all needed packages now? and deal with the build ordering (if necessary) later [20:21] geser, right. I forgot about that! tbh, I'm releuctant to upload something that will FTBFS. I'll upload it to my ppa before. Thanks! [20:29] tumbleweed: ping [20:30] ari-tczew: pong [20:31] tumbleweed: hello, what's the command for verbose files in .deb (binary)? [20:32] dpkg-deb -c ? [20:32] (or debc for a binary changes file) [20:32] tumbleweed: I'll prepare a patch for ddd package, which misses .xpm install [20:33] cool. please forward to debian (obviously) === Laibsch1 is now known as Laibsch [21:34] could someone check whether it can be sync'd? the delta for ssl-cert package reffering to jaunty. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ssl-cert/+changelog [21:39] ari-tczew: what's your opinion? [21:41] geser: the delta is reffering to upgrade packages in jaunty, but jaunty is very old release [21:41] I'd drop the changes, but I'm not 100% sure [21:42] because a delta is old, it doesn't automatically mean it can be dropped [21:42] geser: I don't said delta is old, just affected release is old [21:43] geser: what's your opinion? [21:43] then I misunderstood you [21:44] and I agree that it can be dropped, openssl-blacklist got moved to suggest in the Debian package and the upgrade notice should be a non-issue now [21:45] geser: that's right [21:57] Is REVU still the place for sponsorship requests? [21:57] it doesn't seem to process my uploads [21:58] Laibsch: REVU doesn't process, people process things in REVU [21:58] micahg: not quite correct ;-) [21:58] the server needs to process the upload to show it [21:59] mine doesn't show up in the list [21:59] uploaded it yesterday and today [21:59] Laibsch: are you referring to an existing package or a new package? [21:59] new package [21:59] natspec [21:59] oh, yeah, well then... [21:59] where is the place now? [21:59] Laibsch: same place, just lack of REVUers :) [22:00] OK [22:00] that's kind of unchanged ;-) [22:00] but again, the server doesn't even process my package [22:00] it doesn't show up in the list [22:00] Laibsch: is it debian 545151 [22:00] Debian bug 545151 in wnpp "ITP: libnatspec -- a library for national and language-specific issues" [Wishlist,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/545151 [22:00] yes, that's the one [22:00] and there is a bug in LP as well [22:01] about unzip and encoding issues [22:01] Laibsch: so, getting into debian would be ideal, have you tried that route? [22:01] do you remember my nick [22:01] ? [22:01] no need to always start with the basics ;-) [22:02] Yes, I'm maintaining a number of packages in Debian already [22:02] and the upload to Debian is in progress [22:02] Laibsch: are you just trying to get in Maverick before FF? [22:02] but that won't be in time for maverick (at least most likely it won't) [22:02] kind of [22:02] DIF [22:02] no? [22:03] and I think we're already past DIF [22:03] k, I should probably stop now since I'm not helping here... [22:03] * micahg will bbiab [22:03] * micahg can't REVU anyways [22:03] but maybe you can help me find out why the darn server won't process my uploads [22:04] :-/ [22:07] tumbleweed: ddd patch updated [22:19] Laibsch1: idk, I see the upload, but it says there was an issue and idk who admins REVU [22:20] some special restricted-access area? [22:20] because I don't see anything [22:20] and I did not get a mail about it, eithr [22:20] Laibsch1: http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?upid=8500 [22:21] it's now showing in the list, too === Laibsch1 is now known as Laibsch [22:21] thanks [23:02] bdrung: could you sync this one? bug 614210 it's necessary for some packages to merge [23:02] Launchpad bug 614210 in javatools (Ubuntu) "Sync javatools 0.32 (main) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/614210 === Laibsch1 is now known as Laibsch [23:56]