RAOF | tjaalton: Bah, sorry; should have built with -sa obviously. The tarballs are in the archive, or uscan will grab them. I'll push them now if you ilke. | 00:19 |
---|---|---|
RAOF | I didn't push many of those packages to git, since they're basically a pre-sync from experimental. | 00:21 |
RAOF | And no-change rebuilds of packages sync'd from Debian also don't warrant an ubuntu branch. | 00:23 |
Sarvatt | RAOF: he was talking about the ones that were merged in debian-experimental git but not released in experimental, i got em all though | 00:42 |
RAOF | Sarvatt: Yeah, thanks. | 00:43 |
Sarvatt | or did you have those in that huge pile of drivers? | 00:43 |
RAOF | I had those in the huge pile of drivers, but I didn't build with -sa | 00:44 |
Sarvatt | oh bah, i should have looked! | 00:45 |
RAOF | 'sok. | 00:46 |
RAOF | I think we might be one sync from Debian down. | 00:46 |
Sarvatt | openchrome needs an xsfbs update (thats in video-all so its important) | 00:47 |
Sarvatt | i put in sync requests for geode and chips this morning | 00:48 |
asac | RAOF: will you upload xorg soon ;)? | 00:51 |
RAOF | asac: So soon as to be _in the past_ ! | 00:52 |
asac | RAOF: https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+changelog | 00:52 |
asac | or is that source dead? | 00:53 |
RAOF | Oh, right. | 00:54 |
RAOF | No, it's not yet uploaded. | 00:54 |
RAOF | Yes, soon :) | 00:54 |
* RAOF thought Timo had uploaded it last night.= | 00:54 | |
asac | lol | 00:56 |
asac | very good. if you do it now i can get my xorg packages back in the morning ;) | 00:56 |
asac | all will be fine. i just keep it running ;) | 00:56 |
asac | ttyt | 00:57 |
bryceh | heya RAOF, how're things going? | 01:09 |
RAOF | bryceh: Busy busy busy! | 01:11 |
bryceh | :-) | 01:12 |
bryceh | RAOF, hey I was wondering if you could help me with an X problem. | 01:13 |
RAOF | Sure. | 01:13 |
bryceh | I dropped my laptop in the bathtub, and now all I get is a garbled screen when I turn it on | 01:13 |
bryceh | should I dry it off before turning it on? | 01:13 |
RAOF | Yes. | 01:13 |
RAOF | But more. | 01:13 |
RAOF | You should find a chemical fire extinguisher. | 01:13 |
bryceh | hehe | 01:14 |
RAOF | Hook it up to the fan outlet, and empty the extinguisher through it. | 01:14 |
bryceh | would it help if I installed more proprietary drivers? I have installed all the proprietary video drivers I could find online. still it doesn't work. | 01:14 |
RAOF | That will collect all the water, and leave you with a shiny, clean laptop interior! | 01:14 |
RAOF | Aww, man. Sitting in front of the heater. So much better! | 03:05 |
tjaalton | RAOF: hey, yeah I left xorg out because openchrome was missing, but was too tired to mention it here :) | 05:56 |
RAOF | That's ok. Openchrome & xorg is on the way. | 05:57 |
tjaalton | great | 05:57 |
RAOF | Thanks for all the sponsoring. | 05:58 |
tjaalton | np | 05:58 |
RAOF | Hm. Can you ack the -chips sync request? bug #615496 | 05:59 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 615496 in xserver-xorg-video-chips (Ubuntu) "Sync xserver-xorg-video-chips 1:1.2.3-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/615496 | 05:59 |
tjaalton | better yet, I can "sync" it | 05:59 |
tjaalton | what was that command again... | 06:00 |
RAOF | That would also work :) | 06:00 |
RAOF | I think you need to grab ubuntu-dev-tools from bzr; then it's syncpackage, IIRC. | 06:00 |
tjaalton | yeah I have the old script which should work as well.. letsssee | 06:01 |
tjaalton | huh, the script fails if there's an epoch, which doesn't show on the link | 06:03 |
tjaalton | oh well, it's just a wget & debsign away | 06:03 |
tjaalton | hrm, can't dput without .changes | 06:04 |
tjaalton | ah, the script extracts and rebuilds the source | 06:06 |
tjaalton | RAOF: bah, confirmed the sync request instead, now breakfast :) | 06:11 |
RAOF | Have deliciousness! | 06:11 |
tjaalton | dunno how to unsub the sponsors team | 06:11 |
RAOF | If you're not on the sponsors team, you can't. | 06:11 |
RAOF | If you are, then I think it's a red ‘-’ next to the team subscription. | 06:11 |
tjaalton | yeah, I'm not | 06:33 |
=== ara_ is now known as ara | ||
alf__ | Sarvatt: Hi! I have attached an alternative debdiff to debian #587771 with the changes you proposed. | 09:36 |
ubot4 | Debian bug 587771 in cairo "Package cairo-perf utilities" [Wishlist,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/587771 | 09:36 |
cnd | RAOF, Sarvatt: are you aware of any issues with radeon cards and the latest x uploads yesterday? | 10:14 |
cnd | the screen on this dell laptop is all corrupted and unusable | 10:15 |
cnd | I can't even get to a VT :( | 10:15 |
cnd | I just did a full apt-get dist-upgrade and reboot and things seem ok | 10:26 |
cnd | so maybe it was just some weird stale package | 10:27 |
Sarvatt | tjaalton: wget http://sarvatt.com/downloads/ack-sync && ./ack-sync -e sarvatt@ubuntu.com 615496 -k yourkeyid | 10:31 |
Sarvatt | tjaalton: oh nevermind its fix released now :) | 10:31 |
ara | RAOF, any ETA for ABI? | 10:46 |
ara | RAOF, morning, by the way, sorry 0:-) | 10:46 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
vish | tseliot: hi, what is the variable xthickness in the gtk context menu patch? is it configurable? or.. | 11:38 |
vish | http://bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=165743 | 11:38 |
tseliot | vish: I'm not sure but I think it's something that the theme decides | 11:39 |
tseliot | vish: why? | 11:40 |
vish | tseliot: i was asked what that was on #gtk+ | 11:40 |
tseliot | vish: so, yes, I think what I said is correct. It's part of the gtk style and it can be defined in gtkrc | 11:47 |
vish | tseliot: yeah , so seems we might need an update to the patch? | 11:48 |
tseliot | vish: why? | 11:48 |
tseliot | what did they say? | 11:48 |
vish | tseliot: there is a new comment on the bug.. as to why we need the xthickness | 11:48 |
tseliot | vish: ok, let me have a look | 11:49 |
vish | tseliot: thanks. | 11:50 |
njin | hy all | 12:10 |
njin | someone around? | 12:11 |
Sarvatt | ara: do you mean the new xserver? it's in already, proprietary drivers arent updated though because they dont work with it | 12:18 |
ara | Sarvatt, OK, thanks for the update | 12:19 |
tseliot | Sarvatt, ara: I'll update the Nvidia driver soon. At least nvidia-current works with the new X | 12:24 |
Sarvatt | oh it does? \o/ | 12:24 |
tseliot | yes, it's ABI compatible | 12:24 |
Sarvatt | 256.44? | 12:24 |
* tseliot nods | 12:24 | |
tseliot | I might upload it today | 12:25 |
ara | tseliot, thanks! | 12:56 |
tseliot | np | 12:56 |
tseliot | Sarvatt, jcristau: it looks like /usr/share/xserver-xorg/serverminver is no longer in xserver-xorg-dev. Do you know why? Has it been replaced with something else? | 15:25 |
tseliot | maybe I should have a look at how open source (graphics) driver packages bump the server video abi automatically | 15:26 |
Sarvatt | it was deprecated a long time ago and finally removed in the new xserver | 15:27 |
Sarvatt | http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-xorg/xsfbs.git;a=summary | 15:28 |
gord | hi all, seems no nvidia binary driver supports xorg 1.9, are we going to stick with 1.9 in maverick and hope that nvidia come out with a driver that supports it? or maybe have some packaging magic to fix it? | 15:30 |
Sarvatt | gord: ppa://ubuntu-x-swat/x-updates | 15:32 |
Sarvatt | tseliot says 256.44 works, nvidia said they were going to put out a xserver 1.9 compatible one back in june | 15:32 |
tseliot | I'm working on the nvidia package and I'll upload it as soon as I'm done with this packaging issue | 15:33 |
tseliot | well, Nvidia told me that | 15:33 |
gord | running 256.44 here, grabbed it from the xorg-edgers ppa, doesn't seem to work. xorg says the ABI is broken in xorg.log | 15:34 |
Sarvatt | ah it's waiting to build still, i guess it'll fail because of the serverminver thing. i fixed that a few uploads ago to that ppa but lost it when i resynced to the ubuntu packaging | 15:34 |
Sarvatt | tried IgnoreABI? maybe tseliot has a newer nvidia release that works or something | 15:35 |
Sarvatt | try adding Option "IgnoreABI" "true" to your xorg.conf? | 15:36 |
tseliot | Sarvatt: was that package built against the new X? | 15:36 |
tseliot | if not, it could try to remove X | 15:36 |
gord | yeah i was going to try ignoreABI but i assumed that might be a bad idea ;) i'll give that a shot | 15:37 |
tseliot | but I guess we're facing a different problem here | 15:37 |
Sarvatt | the one i just uploaded was but it hasn't built yet, the one in xorg-edgers was from the start | 15:37 |
Sarvatt | gord: let me know if it works if you can, I can't test it | 15:38 |
tseliot | maybe let's wait for that package to build then? | 15:38 |
Sarvatt | it wont build because of the serverminver thing | 15:38 |
tseliot | ok, let me fix that, then we'll try | 15:39 |
Sarvatt | one sec will give you a diff | 15:43 |
tseliot | I'm rebuilding locally | 15:43 |
tseliot | it was just a matter a copy & paste from -intel | 15:44 |
tseliot | Sarvatt: ^ | 15:44 |
tseliot | nice, it built | 15:47 |
Sarvatt | http://sarvatt.com/downloads/nvidia.patch | 15:48 |
Sarvatt | oh i shoulda looked first :) | 15:48 |
tseliot | thanks anyway | 15:48 |
Sarvatt | i didn't make an orig.tar.gz for the nvidia package in x-updates because i got burned unable to update since they differed with the archive version last time :D | 15:49 |
tseliot | Sarvatt: yes, just wait a little bit and you won't have to upload the tarball | 15:52 |
Sarvatt | no worries man, thanks for doing that! was just mentioning why the package was messed up :P | 15:55 |
Sarvatt | jcristau: is it safe to update protos in unstable or should these go into experimental? gl, render, video, x11, kb, xext | 15:58 |
gord | Sarvatt, can confirm that adding ignoreAPI to the serverflags section gets me up and running with .44 :) | 16:04 |
gord | ignoreABI* | 16:04 |
Sarvatt | woohoo | 16:04 |
tseliot | gord: what architecture do you use? amd64 or i386? | 16:30 |
gord | tseliot, amd64 | 16:30 |
tseliot | gord: would you like to try my package without the ignoreABI option? | 16:31 |
gord | tseliot, sure | 16:32 |
Sarvatt | wow what the heck happened to power usage, i've been tethered to a power cord for the past 2 months so i hadn't noticed maverick is using ~4 watts more idle | 16:35 |
Sarvatt | thats a lot when i was only using ~6.7 watts idle before in lucid | 16:35 |
tseliot | gord: ok, I'm uploading my package to my personal webspace. I'll let you know when it's ready | 16:36 |
gord | Sarvatt, do you have beam.smp running when you look at top? its destroying power usage all over. related to ubuntu one and gwibber (couchdb) | 16:37 |
gord | tseliot, sure thing | 16:37 |
Sarvatt | nope i purged those a long time ago for killing battery | 16:37 |
Sarvatt | nothing really using cpu and a really low amount of wakeups/second in powertop (around 80 or so) | 16:38 |
bryceh | Sarvatt, ubuntu-one was sucking down a lot of power on my system until I got rid of it | 16:48 |
johanbr | Sarvatt, could be https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/524281 | 16:52 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 524281 in linux-2.6 (Debian) (and 1 other project) "Tens of wakes per second in "[kernel scheduler] Load balancing tick" on Core 2 Duo even with only 1 core enabled (affects: 88) (dups: 1) (heat: 550)" [Unknown,Incomplete] | 16:52 |
Sarvatt | i dont have any ubuntuone or gwibber packages installed. i figured it out though, normally i unloaded a bunch of modules on battery and i didn't that time, my webcam and wired NIC suck up a ton of power | 16:54 |
Sarvatt | haha "tens of wakeups" | 16:54 |
johanbr | at least for me, it's more like hundreds | 16:54 |
Sarvatt | it was close to 800/second here just in load balancing tick up to 2.6.35-14.19 | 16:54 |
Sarvatt | but 2.6.35-14.20 fixed that | 16:54 |
johanbr | 22.0% (421.6) [extra timer interrupt] | 16:55 |
Sarvatt | are you using -14.20? | 16:55 |
johanbr | hmm...no | 16:55 |
johanbr | I'll have to try that | 16:55 |
bryceh | Sarvatt, oh yeah webcam sucked power hard for me too | 16:56 |
johanbr | even when not in use? | 16:56 |
Sarvatt | johanbr: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-tip.git;a=commitdiff;h=396e894 is in 2.6.35-14.20, it made a HUGE difference | 16:57 |
bryceh | Sarvatt, you know what we need is a little applet to optimize power with all these tricks | 16:57 |
Sarvatt | yeah its over 1W here not in use | 16:57 |
Sarvatt | goes right down unloading the module | 16:57 |
johanbr | bryceh, I vaguely remember Richard Hughes working on something like that | 16:57 |
johanbr | possibly as part of gnome-power-manager | 16:58 |
Sarvatt | pm-utils does a bunch of it now, a bunch of the stuff i use isn't something most people would want and a gui would be nice.. things like unloading wired NIC's, card readers, webcams, enabling wifi power savings modes and stuff | 16:59 |
Sarvatt | i even went so far as hacking up my bios on this netbook to enable lower screen brightness settings that flicker and use sata mode | 17:01 |
Sarvatt | there's a crazy amount of efi variables not exposed on the OEM bios pages for most laptops that you can manually enable | 17:02 |
tseliot | gord: please try this package (remember to comment out IgnoreABI line in your xorg.conf): http://albertomilone.com/ubuntu/nvidia-current_256.44-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb | 17:04 |
gord | tseliot, that package doesn't seem to work when i have my ignoreABI line commented out - re-adding the line works fine though | 17:28 |
tseliot | gord: ok, thanks for testing. I'll talk to Nvidia again | 17:29 |
gord | np | 17:30 |
Sarvatt | bryceh: in case you want to fill this out some more and send it to xorg-devel - http://sarvatt.com/downloads/patches/0001-Spelling-fix-in-help-docs.patch | 17:32 |
Sarvatt | it's our only delta over debian | 17:33 |
Sarvatt | (in x11-xserver-utils) | 17:33 |
Sarvatt | oh good git send-email works fine sending from other authors, sorry for sending that to you but it cc-ed you automatically and i wanted to see what happened | 17:36 |
bryceh | Sarvatt, ok thanks yeah feel free to send it in; it's pretty trivial | 17:36 |
Sarvatt | ok to add your signed-off-by then? is the email right? | 17:38 |
bryceh | yep | 17:38 |
asac | RAOF: my friend ;) | 17:50 |
asac | RAOF: https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/UserPlatforms/2010-08-10 please search for RAOF here ;) | 17:51 |
Sarvatt | mesa makes me a bit nervous, since they skipped a release cycle 7.8->7.9 is going to be a huge change and there are going to be much potential for regressions with the new glsl2 stuff (that isn't even getting merged for a few weeks yet) up until the very last minute. not to mention we'd need to somehow get mesa demos packaged and uploaded in debian and brought over by tomorrow? :) aside from the demos problem it'll take a few days redoing the bu | 18:06 |
Sarvatt | ild system for all of the egl/gles/etc changes in 7.9 | 18:06 |
Sarvatt | since mesa demos needs seperate packaging its a good time to review what other demos would be useful to package up (and create man pages for) outside of glxgears/glxinfo | 18:10 |
bjsnider | Sarvatt, i managed to backport the nvidia-current built scripts to pre-lucid distros | 18:14 |
Sarvatt | darnit, i wrote up a patch for jockey to add IgnoreABI to serverflags for nvidia last time I went through this in edgers but I can't find it | 18:15 |
Sarvatt | bjsnider: but they can use the .run's! :D lucky buggers | 18:17 |
bryceh | Sarvatt, how about dropping glxgears from the default install ;-) | 18:22 |
Sarvatt | it already is :) | 18:25 |
Sarvatt | 7 packages depend on mesa-utils, can't just not package glxinfo at all :( | 18:26 |
Sarvatt | mesa-utils is in universe and i've had to get on the net to install it off of livecd's since last december | 18:27 |
bjsnider | yeah, they can use the .runs and overwrite a bunch of mesa files | 18:39 |
Q-FUNK | do the maverick drivers need to depend only upon videoabi or also on inputabi? | 19:30 |
Q-FUNK | sorry, video drivers | 19:30 |
Q-FUNK | Sarvatt: would you have a minute to help me with this? | 19:33 |
Sarvatt | Q-FUNK: http://sarvatt.com/downloads/geode.patch | 19:48 |
Q-FUNK | Sarvatt: well, I have a slightly more elaborate idea in mind to maintain backportability :) | 19:48 |
Q-FUNK | Sarvatt: http://pastebin.com/TvUyjw3T | 19:50 |
Sarvatt | squeeze should work with that since serverminver was deprecated awhile back but yeah older wont work without more fiddling | 19:50 |
Q-FUNK | however, for some reason, it barfs, complaining about a missing "then" statement, even though it's there. | 19:51 |
Sarvatt | is there any reason for there to be an explicit ${xserver:Depends} on geode-dbg since it already depends on -geode which depends on that? | 19:51 |
Q-FUNK | to depend upon xserver-xorg-core-dbg | 19:52 |
Q-FUNK | we'd normaly have matching versions for core and -dbg, but you never know | 19:53 |
Q-FUNK | hm. I really wonder what makes it think that the "then" statement is missing. | 19:55 |
Sarvatt | how far back are you planning on backporting it? | 20:01 |
Q-FUNK | http://pastebin.com/Ci18SR4F | 20:06 |
Q-FUNK | at least lucid | 20:07 |
Q-FUNK | hopefully older, but I'm not holding my breath for that, because of e.g. gcc << 4.3 | 20:08 |
Q-FUNK | hm. barfs on that last IF | 20:08 |
Sarvatt | darn thats right, lucid didn't get xserver 1.7.6.901 in time :( | 20:16 |
Sarvatt | i'm messing with it trying to get it going too but haven't had any luck so far | 20:18 |
Q-FUNK | the above *would* work, exept that I forgot that we're dealing with m4, rather than bourne, syntax. | 20:28 |
Q-FUNK | http://pastebin.com/HejstSVf | 20:36 |
Q-FUNK | darn. I'm still stuck on that last IF statement. make complains of a missing IF | 20:36 |
Sarvatt | Q-FUNK: how about something like this? http://sarvatt.com/downloads/geode.patch | 20:56 |
Sarvatt | whoops reuploaded it, forgot something | 20:58 |
Sarvatt | can add the -dbg thing back i just dropped it while i was testing | 20:59 |
Sarvatt | looks good on current maverick, need to see what happens on lucid though | 21:00 |
Sarvatt | Depends: libc6 (>= 2.7), xorg-video-abi-8.0, xserver-xorg-core (>= 2:1.8.99.904) | 21:01 |
Sarvatt | Provides: xserver-xorg-video-8, xserver-xorg-video-amd | 21:01 |
Q-FUNK | shouldn't that ifeq go the other way around? | 21:05 |
Q-FUNK | ifeq (our string) then use the full videodep? | 21:06 |
Sarvatt | /usr/share/xserver-xorg/videodrvdep doesn't exist in lucid so it'll be true there and use the old variables and false if it exists and use the new ones | 21:09 |
Sarvatt | i just reused whats used in all the other xsfbs packages | 21:09 |
Sarvatt | and instead of erroring out saying you need to update xorg-server to 1.7.6.901+ use the old substvars | 21:10 |
Q-FUNK | hm, it seems to interpret the expanded $VIDEODEP as an equate statement to compare | 21:11 |
Q-FUNK | on systems that have the newer file, that is | 21:14 |
Sarvatt | oh whoops it should be VIDDRIVER_PROVIDES = xserver-xorg-video-$(VIDEOABI), xorg-driver-video | 21:16 |
Sarvatt | i get the feeling i missed something else there :) | 21:17 |
Sarvatt | maybe not, i dont see xserver:Depends used in current packages | 21:18 |
Q-FUNK | http://pastebin.com/8dz5fZQG | 21:25 |
Q-FUNK | doesn't like the way VIDEODEP expands | 21:27 |
Q-FUNK | Sarvatt: I think I got a winner. | 23:02 |
Q-FUNK | now, I just need this uploaded to debian/unstable && sync'ed into maverick and we're set. :) | 23:16 |
yofel | should bug 616023 be reassigned to nvidia-graphics-drivers? | 23:27 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 616023 in xorg (Ubuntu) "nVidia card : X won't start since 1.9 update, no screens found (affects: 5) (heat: 24)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/616023 | 23:27 |
RAOF | yofel: That should be against nvidia-graphics-drivers, and tselliot's next upload of nvidia-current should fix it. | 23:51 |
yofel | thanks | 23:51 |
RAOF | asac: I'm not sure what you mean by “mesa test program” there - do you mean the mesa-demos? | 23:53 |
RAOF | asac: As in - something like glxgears, but testing egl, gles, etc? | 23:57 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!