=== Cepheus|Away is now known as Cepheus [00:13] can someone change the status of https://code.launchpad.net/~yofel/ubuntu/lucid/ubufox/lp557240/+merge/29858 to merged? [00:14] bdrung: done ;) [00:14] thanks [00:22] yofel: can you mark https://code.launchpad.net/~serge-hallyn/ubuntu/lucid/qemu-kvm/memleak-fix/+merge/28645 as merged? [00:23] no, I could only mark the first one as merged because that was my branch [00:24] aha, ok [00:25] then i have to wait that launchpad get fixed [00:25] I've been looking through the packaging documentation for a while now and still I'm running in circles. Could someone set me straight. I took the source of pidgin-libnotify and modified one file. Now I want to get a build in my personal launchpad ppa for x32 and amd64 [00:27] isleshocky77: you might want to ask this in #ubuntu-motu [00:27] bdrung: Thanks. [00:39] bdrung: #ubuntu-packaging is for PPA packaging Qs [00:40] micahg: k, that's an even better place [00:40] :) === bpeel is now known as bpeel_away === oubiwann-away is now known as oubiwann [01:21] hi! [01:24] hi [01:25] hi thumper i need help with a team. [01:25] can you help me? [01:26] not sure how much help I can be, but ask away [01:28] the owner registered in the team is not more available and I need a ticket to send a LoCo Council, thumper [01:29] which team? [01:29] https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mx [01:31] https://edge.launchpad.net/~fetova is an admin of the team [01:31] what is it you need to do? [01:32] ahm, actually I'm a LoCo Contact of the team, but the owner is not available, the LoCo Council know the situation. [01:33] and request me a ticket support [01:36] https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+addquestion <- say the team and loco council info [01:37] ok [01:37] thats all? [01:43] Toluxero: that's all I think [01:44] thumper, thanks! :D [01:46] np [01:47] thumper, so... the question in what language? [01:47] english preferrably as the admins are all english speaking [01:48] oks [01:56] thumper, thanks again :D === mwhudson_ is now known as mwhudson === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === oubiwann is now known as oubiwann-away === oubiwann-away is now known as oubiwann === oubiwann is now known as oubiwann-away === oubiwann-away is now known as oubiwann [09:18] Hello [09:19] !oops [09:20] !help [09:20] Please don't ask to ask a question, simply ask the question (all on ONE line and in the channel, so that others can read and follow it easily). If anyone knows the answer they will most likely reply. :-) [09:20] @help [09:21] lifeless: !messagethebot :D [09:21] * nigelb hides. [09:22] nigelb: if you know how to teach it a new help topic, that would be grand [09:22] I wrote up a wiki page about oopses [09:22] and I'd like to make it easy to point people about it [09:32] lifeless: I do [09:33] o/ [09:33] lifeless: jussi will help you with it [09:33] what do you want to add? [09:33] !owner [09:33] This bot is owned by jussi01 and kindly hosted by Rackspace - http://rackspace.com/ - Questions about ubottu should be asked in #ubuntu-bots [09:33] I want tou be able to do !oops [09:33] :) [09:34] and have it give a link to [09:34] jussi: "kindly"? free? [09:34] lifeless: what should !oops say? [09:34] https://help.launchpad.net/Oops [09:34] nigelb: correct [09:34] whoa, cool [09:34] !test [09:34] hrm? [09:34] jussi: just giving the URL would be ok [09:35] saying a little more like 'An OOPS is a system error in launchpad, please see https://help.launchpad.net/Oops' would be better. [09:35] lifeless: we need to follow how factoids need to be constructed, small explanation, url. [09:35] jussi: syre [09:35] sure [09:36] lifeless: ok. for future reference, use this syntax, and the bot will forward it for moderation. !oops is An OOPS is a system error in launchpad, please see https://help.launchpad.net/Oops [09:37] with the in it ? [09:37] !oops [09:37] An OOPS is a system error in launchpad, please see https://help.launchpad.net/Oops [09:37] lifeless: yes [09:37] ok, thanks [09:37] I'll try to remember ;) [09:37] \o/ [09:37] no probs. [09:37] !bot [09:37] Hi! I'm ubottu's favorite infobot, you can search my brain yourself at http://ubottu.com/factoids.cgi - Usage info: http://ubottu.com/devel/wiki/Plugins [09:37] lifeless: that link has how to do it if you ever need it again [09:38] jussi: thanks a lot [09:38] lifeless: also, Ive made that a specific factoid for this channel only. if you want to call it outside of here, use !oops-#launchpad [09:39] ok [09:40] ok then. Laters! === bpeel_away is now known as bpeel === yofel_ is now known as yofel [11:22] maxb, ping [11:22] hi [11:22] yeah, I'm thick and meant just the android-trunk bit :) [11:22] er, android-client [11:22] just wanted to check :-) [11:23] Launchpad: saving me from my own stupidity. again :) [11:24] updated, import in progress [11:31] winner, thanks [11:40] If I've got two separate codebases which may share some code and are of the same sort of thing -- we have an "Android client for Ubuntu One" project on LP, but we'll actually have a few separate clients, in time (one for contacts, one for files, etc) -- should they be separate LP projects? Or are separate branches in the one project a good idea? [11:49] aquarius: Generally the question "Are the Bazaar branches going to have interrelated history?" is a good guide to "Should these things all be one project?" [11:50] well...some of it will be interrelated. The different clients will share code, but will start from different places. I'm not sure what that means as an answer to your question :) [11:53] Maybe there's a shared library plus N clients, all of which are projects? [11:58] aquarius: Sounds like they should be separate projects. [11:58] Or a single branch. [11:59] wgrant, cheers; that's exactly why I'm asking the question. Obviously all of these are doable technically; what I'm trying to do is fit in with the zen of launchpad === mpt_ is now known as mpt [12:14] hi all [12:15] I bought a subscription the other day and created a proprietary project [12:15] but I can't seem to find the documentation to make branches private [12:15] doesn't anybody know where I can find it? [12:16] esteve: you have to ask an admin (aka losa) for that [12:17] mwhudson: thanks [12:17] (that is, they can update a setting so that your project will default to private branches) [12:18] noodles775: so all the branches that my team pushes will be made private, am I right? [12:18] Once a losa has update your project, all the branches that your team pushes for that project will be private by default, yes. (ie. pushing to ~username/project-name/branch-name) [12:19] (or ~teamname/project-name/branch of course :) ). [12:19] noodles775: great! thanks [12:20] so, who is an admin/losa? [12:21] or can I just open a question against malone (not sure about the name)? [12:21] esteve: they would normally have already jumped by this point (by mentioning losa), but they're currently off sprinting together, so it might be worth asking a question against launchpad-code. [12:26] noodles775: ok, thanks, I just opened one https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad-code/+question/120715 [12:46] can anyone shed some light on why the svn revisions are off on https://code.launchpad.net/~x3lectric/xbmc/svn-trunk [12:46] comparing to http://trac.xbmc.org/timeline [12:47] the svn versions dont match but commits do [12:48] the real svn displays version 32624 and the lauchapad is 2something its well off version nr === mars changed the topic of #launchpad to: http://launchpad.net/ | Read https://help.launchpad.net/ for help | Help contact: - | Join https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | Launchpad is open source: https://dev.launchpad.net/ [12:49] is this a bug in launchpad? [12:50] X3: Bazaar revision numbers are unique within a branch. Subversion revision numbers are unique across all branches in the repository. [12:50] If you do an svn log on trunk, you'll see there are revision numbers missing (since they're in other branches). [12:51] bzr doesn't know about the other branches, and doesn't count the revisions outside trunk. [12:51] wgrant but if I build that those packages will never trigger update on ppa cause revision is way lower [12:51] X3: What's your versioning scheme? [12:51] er svn? [12:51] wgrant: your branch should be on staging now [12:51] bigjools: Thanks. I'll QA it. [12:52] X3: I mean, how do you construct the version string for your packages? [12:52] you mean the recipe? [12:53] Yes. [12:53] atm none cause idk how to [12:53] + the discrepancy im totally lost [12:54] If you're not already building packages from svn directly, then there are no packages with the svn revision number for your bzr packages to be less than. === matsubara-afk is now known as matsubara [12:59] wagrant what recipe should it use that? [13:08] can you help with recipe? === mrevell is now known as mrevell-lunch === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha [13:32] How often does PPA publication happen ? [13:33] 5 minutes, in theory, though it seems sluggish lately [14:00] det, maxb: nominally it's 5 minutes but when the load is large it will take longer === PsyTrance_ is now known as PsyTrance === mrevell-lunch is now known as mrevell === Cepheus is now known as Cepheus|Away [14:34] Thanks [14:34] seems mine took like 1 hour === Cepheus|Away is now known as Cepheus === oubiwann is now known as oubiwann-away === oubiwann-away is now known as oubiwann [15:52] hi === deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] [15:55] hi === Cepheus is now known as Cepheus|Away === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch === fta_ is now known as fta === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-lunch [16:34] rockstar: is there a bug for recipe builds on Maverick? They fail b/c of no orig.tar.gz [16:34] hexmode, not that I'm aware of. [16:34] hexmode, do you have a buildlog I can see? [16:35] http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53488576/buildlog.txt.gz [16:35] from https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~hexmode/+recipe/org-mode-daily [16:37] Also, just fyi, I'm impressed that estimated build times were actually pretty accurate this morning. [16:38] rockstar: ^^ in case you missed it === salgado is now known as salgado-lunch [16:44] hexmode, well, the problem wasn't in their accuracy, but in the number of packages that were "cutting" in line. [16:45] heh [16:51] rockstar: final q: build schedule says "built daily" but no builds have happend for several days. Why? [16:52] hexmode, known issue, but I don't know the details. I'll have to find out. [16:53] rockstar: ok, if you know who I should bug about it, I could find out. otherwise, thanks. [16:54] hexmode, you should me about it. :) === fta_ is now known as fta [17:02] hexmode, sorry, just got to looking at your Maverick issue, and it looks like that bug is https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad-code/+bug/614768 [17:02] Error: Could not parse data returned by Launchpad: The read operation timed out (https://launchpad.net/bugs/614768) [17:05] rockstar: thanks... === Ursinha-lunch is now known as Ursinha-brb === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara === beuno is now known as beuno-lunch [17:52] rockstar: also, looks like it does a source build first (-S) and then reschedules for a binary build (ex: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~hexmode/+recipe/emacs-daily/+build/796) [17:52] hexmode, yeah, that's correct. [17:52] rockstar: but, under pending builds, it doesn't really show that. [17:52] hexmode, there's a bug about that, but it's not really a pending build. It built the source package like you asked. :) [17:52] rockstar: it says "successful build" ... even though, since these are from trunk, they could fail [17:52] heh [17:53] rockstar: ok [17:57] i can't figure out how to get the FAQ to show up on my projects overview === beuno-lunch is now known as beuno === salgado-lunch is now known as salgado [18:56] wgrant: around? [18:57] * lamont bets on sleeping [18:57] wondering if the build-record populator that we run after PaS changes got updated for arch: linux-any packages as part of the fix === bpeel is now known as bpeel_away === Ursinha-brb is now known as Ursinha === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === EdwinGrubbs is now known as Edwin-lunch === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === bpeel_away is now known as bpeel === Edwin-lunch is now known as EdwinGrubbs === fta_ is now known as fta === matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk [22:24] Is there any way I could have https://launchpad.net/nginx-obsolete unlinked from https://launchpad.net/~nginx ? === salgado is now known as salgado-afk [22:40] lamont: Yes. [22:40] lamont: I was thinking about that, and yes, it should work. [22:40] But I really need to strip it down to a create-build-records-only mode. [22:41] However, just running it right after the rollout should fix everything. [22:41] And fix a few things that shouldn't be fixed, but they're not significant. [22:45] wgrant: heh [22:46] 'twould be nice if there were a way to tell it package, version, and distro-arch-series, and have it either create it because it should, or bitch-n-whine and ask if I'm really really really sure I want that even though it shouldn't exist. [22:46] and have it do just that one tuple, instead of walking the world [22:46] oh, and ponies. I want ponies. [22:47] anyway, afk [22:48] Hmm. [22:49] MTecknology: what is nginx-obsolete ? [22:50] lifeless: it was replaced by launchpad.net/nginx [22:50] grah, why ? [22:50] lifeless: Realistically.. you could simply delete it - but I don't think you guys do that [22:50] anyhow - file a question on launchpad.net/launchpad asking for help [22:50] there is no help contact on atm [22:51] lifeless: It was my fault- you can slap me :( === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-bbl === jcsackett is now known as jcsackett|afk [23:02] I want to make a project called builders :( [23:02] wgrant: I see the builders have returned to a state of normalcy - That's nice. :) [23:03] Were they broken? [23:03] They'll be even better than normal tomorrow. === bpeel is now known as bpeel_away [23:19] wgrant: why's that? [23:21] MTecknology: The buildd master has been rewritten. [23:21] wgrant: cool - any specific changes? [23:22] does more stuff in parallel [23:22] oh, cool [23:34] why can't i change the status of https://code.launchpad.net/~toabctl/ubuntu/maverick/xf86-input-wacom/new_upstream_0.10.7/+merge/30469 to invalid or something similar? [23:36] bdrung: it's a personal branch, not an ubuntu branch [23:39] micahg: but it's a merge request [23:39] bdrung: oddly enough there's the resubmit proposal & delete proposal links listed [23:39] micahg: the members of the target branch team should be able to reject a merge request [23:40] i could delete the merge request [23:40] ~ubuntu-branches is set as reviewer (& owner of the branch) [23:40] but then the commend would vanish [23:40] * micahg has no idea [23:41] you're able to set the reviewer of that branch, but that still doesn't fix the problem [23:41] I think the default reviewer for all those branches needs to be changed from ~ubuntu-branches [23:42] yes [23:42] we probably need the TB to do it [23:42] to ~ubuntu-dev? [23:42] or maybe lifeless, he's in the owning team :) [23:42] probably not [23:42] some might be ~ubuntu-core-dev, it'll need some thought === fta_ is now known as fta