| micahg | mdeslaur: new flash releases, should I file a bug? | 00:46 |
|---|---|---|
| micahg | chrisccoulson: FYI if you haven't seen it already: https://developer.mozilla.org/En/Developer_Guide/Interface_Compatibility | 00:54 |
| chrisccoulson | heh, "JSAPI, NSPR, NSS, and other libraries which are currently shipped as separate shared libraries may be integrated into libxul" | 00:56 |
| chrisccoulson | well, gnome-shell is screwed then | 00:57 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: can't we link against libxul then? | 00:57 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - libxul is huge ;) | 00:58 |
| micahg | I didn't say it was the best idea ;) | 00:58 |
| chrisccoulson | i suppose it will still be possible to checkout spidermonkey and build it as a separate module | 00:59 |
| micahg | well, depends on its deps :) | 00:59 |
| chrisccoulson | yeah, and i'm not sure we want to maintain it as a separate module | 01:01 |
| chrisccoulson | perhaps i should send a mail to desktop-devel | 01:03 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: I don't like the idea unless it has upstream support | 01:04 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: do we care at this point if songbird uses system libs or should I try to at least get it using system xul? | 01:09 |
| micahg | (not happening in archive this cycle, just a general question) | 01:09 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - i'd rather it didn't use system xul, else it becomes yet another package that we;ll have to try and look after ;) | 01:09 |
| chrisccoulson | although, if there's someone who's dedicated to maintain it, i don't mind | 01:09 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: the alternative is another app that needs to be updated w/sec vulnerabilities | 01:10 |
| chrisccoulson | yeah, that's a bit of a pain | 01:10 |
| micahg | I'd rather it be like fennec so that it doesn't need to be updated except for major version changes | 01:11 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: there | 01:11 |
| micahg | oops | 01:11 |
| micahg | there's a full web browser in there | 01:11 |
| chrisccoulson | do we get a log of users asking for songbird? | 01:11 |
| micahg | bug 94494 | 01:11 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 94494 in debian (and 2 other projects) "[needs-packaging] Songbird (affects: 33) (dups: 3) (heat: 248)" [Unknown,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/94494 | 01:11 |
| chrisccoulson | i'm reluctant to start adding new gecko users now, especially with the transition to 2.0 approaching | 01:12 |
| chrisccoulson | we don't want to make life difficult for ourselves | 01:12 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: ddecator was working on getting it up to speed before he got pulled away for other things | 01:12 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: I wouldn't throw it in until xul20 was in archive i.e. N release :) | 01:12 |
| chrisccoulson | yeah, but that only delays the inevitable (in that we'd have to transition it at some point) | 01:13 |
| micahg | yeah, well, if it's xul based like fennec and they keep it updated to stable xul, it's not as hard | 01:13 |
| micahg | if they're going to lag behind a couple xul versions, that's another story | 01:14 |
| micahg | kinda moot ATM I guess | 01:14 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: we can discuss at UDS :) | 01:14 |
| mdeslaur | micahg: sure, please (re: flash) | 03:46 |
| micahg | mdeslaur: k, public? | 03:47 |
| micahg | it's published | 03:47 |
| mdeslaur | micahg: yeah, public | 03:50 |
| micahg | mdeslaur: bug 616167 | 03:51 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 616167 in flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu) "New upstream security releases 10.1.82.76 and 9.0.280 (affects: 1) (heat: 260)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/616167 | 03:51 |
| mdeslaur | micahg: thanks! | 03:52 |
| micahg | mdeslaur: np | 03:52 |
| micahg | mdeslaur: I would offer to prepare debdiffs, but I've got a lot to do still before FF | 03:52 |
| mdeslaur | micahg: I'll do them tomorrow morning | 03:53 |
| micahg | mdeslaur: awesome, thanks! | 03:54 |
| fishor | micahg: hi :) firefox-4.0 is still not fixed | 10:13 |
| chrisccoulson | fishor, whats wrong? | 10:18 |
| fishor | chrisccoulson: hi, firfox-4.0 hang issue | 10:18 |
| chrisccoulson | when does that happen? | 10:18 |
| fishor | it looks like it hang on sites with some java ore some thing like this | 10:19 |
| fishor | it startet after update at last friday | 10:19 |
| chrisccoulson | have you got an example site? | 10:19 |
| fishor | igoogle | 10:19 |
| chrisccoulson | friday is when we switched to using bundled libraries | 10:19 |
| fishor | i use amd64 version | 10:20 |
| chrisccoulson | 1 second, i'm just upgrading | 10:20 |
| fishor | hmm... i will recheck now | 10:23 |
| fishor | seems like i didn't updatet corectly | 10:24 |
| fta2 | chrisccoulson, asac: fyi, i patched chromium to report a user agent like this: "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.6 (KHTML, like Gecko) Ubuntu/10.10 Chromium/6.0.491.0 Chrome/6.0.491.0 Safari/534.6" | 10:39 |
| fta2 | just added the "Ubuntu/10.10 Chromium/6.0.491.0" part, everything else untouched | 10:40 |
| fta2 | it's only in the daily build atm. i plan to land it in maverick with the next release | 10:40 |
| fta2 | for the records, upstream didn't want it when i proposed a patch last year, but as it's used by lots of web stats sites, it makes sense for us, as long as it doesn't break websites doing u-a sniffing | 10:42 |
| chrisccoulson | fta2 - it's interesting you should mention that. i closed a bug report yesterday because a user was having an issue with a site doing u-a sniffing | 10:43 |
| chrisccoulson | which had broken firefox, but worked in chromium ;) | 10:43 |
| fta2 | hm | 10:43 |
| chrisccoulson | but that was with the new u-a string i think | 10:43 |
| fta2 | please try with the last daily build then, if it breaks, i guess i should revert | 10:44 |
| chrisccoulson | fta2 - sure, no problem | 10:44 |
| fta2 | chrisccoulson, by "new u-a", you meant in firefox, right? | 10:49 |
| chrisccoulson | fta2 - i meant chromium, although, perhaps i don't have the new u-a string yet | 10:53 |
| chrisccoulson | hmmm, ff4 is seriously broken :/ | 10:54 |
| fta2 | my u-a patch landed only a few hours ago in only 1 ppa | 10:54 |
| fta2 | 4am, paris time | 10:55 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| fta2 | 8h ago | 10:56 |
| fishor | chrisccoulson: i updated now to the last version of 4.0 | 10:56 |
| fishor | and this do not working at all | 10:57 |
| fishor | lex@zwerg:~$ firefox-4.0 | 10:57 |
| chrisccoulson | fishor, yeah, i know ;) | 10:57 |
| fishor | exec: 159: usr/lib/firefox-4.0b4pre/run-mozilla.sh: not found | 10:57 |
| fishor | lex@zwerg:~$ /usr/lib/firefox-4.0b4pre/run-mozilla.sh | 10:57 |
| fishor | run-mozilla.sh: Cannot execute . | 10:57 |
| fishor | lex@zwerg:~$ /usr/lib/firefox-4.0b4pre/run-mozilla.sh | 10:57 |
| chrisccoulson | fishor, i just committed a fix for that in bzr already | 10:57 |
| fishor | run-mozilla.sh: Cannot execute . | 10:57 |
| fishor | ok | 10:57 |
| chrisccoulson | but it still doesn't work | 10:57 |
| fishor | chrisccoulson: thanks | 10:57 |
| chrisccoulson | now it just exits | 10:57 |
| chrisccoulson | and launching the profile selector just crashes :/ | 10:57 |
| fishor | good to kow :D | 10:57 |
| chrisccoulson | urgh, i see what is happening | 10:58 |
| chrisccoulson | none of the manifest files for the chrome are getting installed :/ | 10:58 |
| chrisccoulson | ok, make install no longer installs them, so it's not even a packaging error | 11:01 |
| fishor | chrisccoulson: one more question, why firefox use integrated copy of libvpx and not shared? | 11:02 |
| fishor | libvpx/vp8/webm | 11:03 |
| chrisccoulson | fishor - we build it with it's own copy of all the libraries | 11:04 |
| chrisccoulson | this is the way that mozilla distribute it | 11:05 |
| chrisccoulson | oh, i see the error now | 11:05 |
| chrisccoulson | all the manifest files have been merged in to a single localized.manifest | 11:05 |
| fishor | ok | 11:06 |
| chrisccoulson | b'ah, this makes splitting out the branding a serious pita | 11:08 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - not sure if you want to change the topic in the channel, to say that the FF4.0 dailies are seriously broken ;) | 11:14 |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| bobby | Anyone know why Minefield 4.0 web browser won't open? | 15:07 |
| chrisccoulson | bobby, yes | 15:07 |
| bobby | Do I want to know why? And why was it renamed to minefield? I thought those were only Mozilla's nightly builds? | 15:08 |
| chrisccoulson | there are no chrome manifest files being installed now due to a recent change | 15:08 |
| chrisccoulson | it was renamed to minefield because that's the correct branding for our nightlies | 15:09 |
| bobby | Ah... I do like the icon better... Makes me feel very safe knowing I'm in a browser that's name is associated with death :) | 15:09 |
| === micahg changed the topic of #ubuntu-mozillateam to: Welcome to the Ubuntu Mozilla Team: | Mailing List: http://is.gd/83fnr | Firefox 3.6.8 in Hardy-Maverick | Thunderbird 3.1 (Now in Mozilla Daily PPA) Coming to Maverick This Week | Firefox 4.0 Beta PPA coming Mid August | Report Mozilla PPA bugs here: http://is.gd/dPMLv | Help test Mozilla prerelease updates http://is.gd/dsudW | Firefox 4.0 dailies are seriously broken | ||
| micahg | hi chrisccoulson :) | 15:11 |
| chrisccoulson | hi micahg | 15:13 |
| chrisccoulson | so, this chrome registration change is causing me a real headache ;) | 15:13 |
| bobby | Oh yeah, I forgot to mention that this thing still doesn't make me a fudgeing sandwich. Work on that too please? | 15:13 |
| * micahg needs to remember not to upload to archive when tired | 15:14 | |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: you should be able to set topic also I think | 15:14 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - oh, i'm not sure if i can | 15:14 |
| chrisccoulson | i've never tried ;) | 15:14 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: sorry, forgot to update the blueprint the last couple days, TB31 daily is working | 15:24 |
| micahg | I think well enough for the work item to be marked done | 15:24 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - ok, that's good then :) | 15:26 |
| * micahg hopes we can make our goals before beta | 15:27 | |
| chrisccoulson | right, i'm just about to test a build with the alternative branding bits refactored | 15:27 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: BTW, I fixed the FTBFS with weave/enigmail last night | 15:27 |
| chrisccoulson | not sure how well this is going to work :/ | 15:27 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - cool :) | 15:28 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: apparently something's not pulling right from pkg-config, so I have to add a CXXFLAG until I can dig deeper | 15:28 |
| micahg | new chrome release :-/ | 15:57 |
| * micahg now knows how to invoke fta :) | 15:57 | |
| fta | ? | 15:58 |
| micahg | I said new chrome release and you appeared :) | 15:58 |
| fta | pure coincidence | 15:58 |
| micahg | heh | 15:58 |
| micahg | fta: I see your SRU was accepted | 15:59 |
| fta | already tried to package the new(er) release, but there's a problem upstream | 15:59 |
| fta | i'm waiting for their answer | 16:00 |
| fta | X seriously broken for nvidia users :( | 16:03 |
| fta | trashed my desktop at work | 16:03 |
| magcius | micahg: have you filed the LP nVidia issue upstream yet? | 16:04 |
| fta | chrisccoulson, so, any issue with my UA patch? | 16:04 |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| chrisccoulson | fta - sorry, i didn't have a chance to try it yet | 16:07 |
| chrisccoulson | i'll try it now FF is building | 16:07 |
| micahg | magcius: not yet, trying to get stuff in before Feature freeze | 16:13 |
| magcius | micahg: oh hey | 16:14 |
| magcius | micahg: looks like it's been fixed in 256.44 too | 16:14 |
| micahg | magcius: that rocks! | 16:14 |
| magcius | micahg: but page corruption is still an issue for me | 16:14 |
| micahg | magcius: same test cases as before? | 16:16 |
| magcius | micahg: which are? | 16:16 |
| * micahg doesn't know, the original bug | 16:16 | |
| magcius | I was trying to find it | 16:17 |
| magcius | Do you know where it is? LP, nvnews or BMO? | 16:17 |
| micahg | bug 223238 | 16:18 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 223238 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24 (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "Extremely slow Ajax/Javascript/CSS performance in Firefox 3 using non-free nvidia-glx-new (affects: 18) (dups: 4) (heat: 155)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/223238 | 16:18 |
| magcius | That's the page corruption bug? | 16:19 |
| micahg | hmm | 16:19 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| micahg | is that what was fixed? | 16:19 |
| magcius | actually | 16:19 |
| magcius | I thought it was | 16:19 |
| magcius | but it's slow for me | 16:19 |
| * micahg remembers a few issues w/nvidia in Lucid+ | 16:20 | |
| magcius | micahg: I'm using 4.0b2 because of the issues between AdBlock and the new Async redirect API | 16:21 |
| micahg | magcius: oh, I'd suggest going back to 3.6.x then | 16:21 |
| magcius | micahg: too slow in terms of JS speed | 16:21 |
| chrisccoulson | fta - the u-a string change doesn't cause any issues for me | 16:22 |
| micahg | asac: what do you think of a gnash merge from Debian? apparently there's a new upstream snapshot | 16:22 |
| magcius | micahg: don't bother with Gnash. At all. | 16:22 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - might be worth talking to rsavoye | 16:22 |
| micahg | magcius: it's in archive, I have to bother with it :) | 16:22 |
| asac | micahg: the idea was that rsavoye takes over all the packaging | 16:22 |
| asac | for debian and ubuntu | 16:22 |
| micahg | asac: ah, ok | 16:22 |
| magcius | micahg: they're going to start to merge liblightspark and gnash | 16:22 |
| asac | is he the one who uploaded? | 16:23 |
| magcius | But yeah, there was a release a few days ago | 16:23 |
| micahg | asac: no | 16:23 |
| asac | micahg: chrisccoulson: would be great if you could give rsavoye a hand ... maybe ask for his packaging and see what is not good enough to just take that | 16:23 |
| asac | i know he has his own packaging ... we just should review and then enable him to directly upload to ubuntu | 16:24 |
| asac | let me see | 16:24 |
| asac | i will try to get him in this channel | 16:24 |
| chrisccoulson | can he not upload to ubuntu then? he's maintaining it in debian isn't he? | 16:24 |
| micahg | asac: k, I can't upload it since it's not in the package set, but I can certainly review | 16:24 |
| asac | chrisccoulson: baby is maintaining it in debian, but i discussed with her that we should sponsor his packages to debian | 16:25 |
| asac | if the last debian upload was done by him | 16:25 |
| micahg | asac: also, as long as you're here, what do you think about merging enigmail in debian in pkg-mozext | 16:26 |
| asac | then we should think about synching even ... or review and see what needs to be different still | 16:26 |
| asac | hi rsavoye !! | 16:26 |
| rsavoye | so you want me to do what ? :-) | 16:26 |
| asac | thanks for coming ;) ... chrisccoulson and micahg are your friends from now on too!! ;) | 16:26 |
| rsavoye | good thing I've had coffee... | 16:26 |
| asac | rsavoye: lol ... so who is currently maintaining the debian packaging? still baby? | 16:27 |
| micahg | rsavoye: I noticed a new gnash upload to experiimental and was wondering if we should grab it for maverick | 16:27 |
| chrisccoulson | hi! | 16:27 |
| rsavoye | barely... but yes Baby is also super busy | 16:27 |
| rsavoye | I sent her patches in Feb that never made it into debian | 16:27 |
| asac | rsavoye: baby and i discussed basically what you and i discussed at uds, that we shouldnt waste efforts by doing 3 packages | 16:27 |
| rsavoye | I agree on that one | 16:27 |
| asac | rather enabling you to push your packaging to debian and ubuntu | 16:27 |
| rsavoye | also since I build daily snapshots, that keeps my packaging files in sync with trunk better | 16:28 |
| asac | so as a first step - since gnash came up - i would love to see if we can get your packages in ubuntu | 16:28 |
| asac | otherwise we need to work on that ... chrisccoulson and micahg volunteered to review your packages etc. | 16:28 |
| rsavoye | yes, the ubuntu packaging files could use my other improvements | 16:28 |
| asac | if that works well we can directly push to debian after getting babies blessing and then you can take over | 16:28 |
| rsavoye | I think she'd be glad to not have to do it | 16:29 |
| asac | rsavoye: i am not saying that we should improve the current ubuntu packages, but rather kill them and use your ;) | 16:29 |
| rsavoye | mine are lintian clean :-) | 16:29 |
| asac | and make your packaging so that it works in debian and ubuntu and just upload to debian | 16:29 |
| micahg | always a plus :) | 16:29 |
| asac | but as a first step lets do that for maverick | 16:29 |
| rsavoye | I should grab the ubuntu versions just to make sure there isn't something important in there | 16:30 |
| asac | rsavoye: so can you point micahg and chrisccoulson where to get the packaging? | 16:30 |
| rsavoye | it's in gnash trunk packaging/debian | 16:30 |
| asac | rsavoye: you should, yes. one thing that is important are the Xb-* headers in debian/control | 16:30 |
| asac | rsavoye: ensure you have them (dont hurt for debian) | 16:30 |
| asac | rsavoye: can you check if https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~gnash/gnash/trunk is in sync with your fsf branch | 16:31 |
| asac | ? | 16:31 |
| asac | its easier to tell micahg and chrisccoulson to just run bzr branch lp:gnash ;) | 16:31 |
| * micahg is running that now :) | 16:31 | |
| rsavoye | right, other than we're switching to Git... :-( | 16:31 |
| asac | that branch is auto synched ... just wonder if it is broken ;) | 16:31 |
| asac | rsavoye: you are switching? what is that worth? | 16:31 |
| rsavoye | cause the bzr support on savannah is so bad and out of date it barely works | 16:32 |
| asac | hmm. kk | 16:32 |
| asac | good that we can mirror that so you can still run bzr branch lp:gnash ;) | 16:32 |
| rsavoye | no web browsing of code either, and I couldn't get the savannah admins to fix it for a year... | 16:32 |
| asac | lol | 16:32 |
| asac | hmm | 16:33 |
| chrisccoulson | i quite like git ;) | 16:33 |
| rsavoye | to be honest, the bzr team tried hard to help as much as possible, but got to much push back | 16:33 |
| rsavoye | yeah, most people are glad we;re switching | 16:33 |
| chrisccoulson | although, i probably shouldn't admit that in public | 16:33 |
| rsavoye | we have to stay on savannah, so moving top launchpad wasn't an option | 16:33 |
| rsavoye | the speed difference is astounding... | 16:33 |
| rsavoye | lp:gnash looks very out of date | 16:34 |
| rsavoye | http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnash.git/tree/packaging/debian | 16:34 |
| rsavoye | since the web UI works. :-) | 16:34 |
| asac | rsavoye: is there an announce about switching? | 16:34 |
| asac | rsavoye: lp:gnash is 3 days old ;) | 16:35 |
| rsavoye | I'm playing with it for the release branch first | 16:35 |
| asac | not sure if that can be "very" ;) | 16:35 |
| rsavoye | so we'd switch next week sometime | 16:35 |
| rsavoye | you can also grab my maverick packages from my repo for snapshots on getgnash.org | 16:37 |
| rsavoye | our next release will be out by the end of the month | 16:37 |
| micahg | rsavoye: you have source packages? | 16:37 |
| rsavoye | yes, on getgnash.org. I build snapsots every few days | 16:38 |
| asac | this reminds me: also check the sanity of the versioning scheme for the snapshots maybe ;) | 16:38 |
| rsavoye | it's changing now anyway, as git tags are weird compared to bzr ones | 16:38 |
| rsavoye | I may just go back to a timestamp instead of the revno | 16:39 |
| rsavoye | for releases, it;s just 0.8.8 | 16:39 |
| * micahg only sees 1 dsc in the snapshots dir | 16:39 | |
| rsavoye | check the repo: http://www.getgnash.org/packages/ | 16:40 |
| rsavoye | I should nuke the old snapshots now that I have a repository | 16:40 |
| micahg | rsavoye: source packages please :) | 16:41 |
| micahg | ah, you have for debian, but not Ubuntu | 16:42 |
| * micahg sees 0.8.7 | 16:42 | |
| rsavoye | I have karmic,lucid, and maverick packages | 16:42 |
| rsavoye | plus lenny, gNewsense, and of course RPMs | 16:43 |
| * micahg can't find any ubuntu stuff past intrepid | 16:43 | |
| rsavoye | http://www.getgnash.org/debs/ubuntu/pool/main/g/gnash/ | 16:43 |
| rsavoye | I also build all of the Gnash plugins as packages too | 16:44 |
| micahg | you should update the links on that first page then :) | 16:45 |
| rsavoye | I haven't been building debs lately since I've been hacking ARM assembler lately... | 16:45 |
| rsavoye | micahg: probably :-) I get a bit frustrated having to do everything for Gnash | 16:45 |
| micahg | grabbing r12341 | 16:46 |
| micahg | rsavoye: thanks :) | 16:46 |
| rsavoye | asac: course you realize my canonical contract expires in a few weeks :-( | 16:46 |
| micahg | ugh | 16:48 |
| micahg | build-deps is a mess | 16:48 |
| micahg | but I guess that's so it builds on previous series as well | 16:48 |
| rsavoye | yes, for ubuntu I'd clean that up | 16:49 |
| micahg | rsavoye: you'll want to list each set on a separate line so that it's easier to read | 16:49 |
| rsavoye | supporting multiple deb based distros is a pain... | 16:49 |
| rsavoye | and I should drop some of the alternates | 16:49 |
| rsavoye | too bad maverick and lenny don't use all the same package names | 16:49 |
| micahg | rsavoye: well, if you can use the default in the series, then just use the unversioned -dev package | 16:50 |
| rsavoye | not on lenny. :-) | 16:50 |
| rsavoye | I wil be tweakig these for the release, so suggestions are welcome | 16:50 |
| asac | rsavoye: this is not canonical ... it is about gnash in ubuntu for me | 16:53 |
| rsavoye | I think the biggest differences are how I configure gnash for the packages | 16:53 |
| asac | want to help you fix the problem to distribute gnash ;) | 16:53 |
| rsavoye | I'd love to see the best Gnash packages in Ubuntu we can have too | 16:53 |
| micahg | well, there's dpkg-vendor, but that's only in dpkg 1.15 IIRC | 16:53 |
| Milos_SD | Hi | 16:55 |
| Milos_SD | today's build of Firefox 4 for Lucid doesn't work :( | 16:55 |
| rsavoye | I've got to run out in an hour, but I'll see about a little packaging cleanup tonight | 16:57 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| chrisccoulson | i'll have a look at that too once i've got FF4 working | 16:58 |
| chrisccoulson | Milos_SD, have a look at the topic | 16:58 |
| chrisccoulson | fta - what time to the dailies run normally? | 16:58 |
| fta | chrisccoulson, 4am for ucd, 5am for umd/gwibber, 7am for nmt, 5pm for ucd-dev+beta | 17:00 |
| chrisccoulson | fta - thanks, that's ok then | 17:00 |
| fta | or anytime if you ask me | 17:00 |
| Milos_SD | is there a way that I get back to previous build? | 17:00 |
| fta | (all in paris time) | 17:01 |
| chrisccoulson | fta - i just wanted to make sure there wasn't abuild scheduled soon, as they're quite broken atm | 17:01 |
| chrisccoulson | (for umd) | 17:01 |
| fta | it's 6pm here | 17:01 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: I'm going to start dogfooding TB31, we can fix the dependency issues before upload | 17:01 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg, cool, thanks | 17:03 |
| chrisccoulson | Milos_SD, not unless the packages are still accessible from LP | 17:03 |
| * micahg only has 5 packages left to merge + 3 to update + 1 to update/merge + 1 to package, then we can focus on bugs :) | 17:10 | |
| chrisccoulson | nice! | 17:11 |
| chrisccoulson | well, i've got FF4.0 built and running again, but we've got abrowser branding everywhere now ;) | 17:11 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: is it bad if I miss FF for TB31? | 17:11 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - no, we should be ok | 17:12 |
| micahg | k | 17:12 |
| * micahg figures the other packages that'll have harder times getting exceptions might be better to get in before FF | 17:12 | |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: what do you think ^^ | 17:13 |
| chrisccoulson | yeah, makes sense | 17:13 |
| micahg | i think this looks pretty good for us this cycle: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/multidistrotools/mozilla.html | 17:15 |
| micahg | \o/ broke 10000 for soyuz karma :) | 17:35 |
| chrisccoulson | nice! | 17:39 |
| chrisccoulson | right, doing another FF build now. hopefully it installs things in the right order now, so we get the branding the right way around | 17:39 |
| micahg | cool | 17:40 |
| * micahg is off to $WORK | 17:40 | |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| chrisccoulson | fta - would you mind respinning the FF4.0 builds in umd please? | 19:39 |
| gnomefreak | anyway we can describe xulrunner-2.0-testsuite better? | 19:39 |
| * gnomefreak not sure what it is :( | 19:40 | |
| chrisccoulson | gnomefreak, if you can think of a description ;) | 19:40 |
| gnomefreak | chrisccoulson: i have no clue what it is or does | 19:40 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: is mozillateam admin for this channel or is it open to anyone? | 19:40 |
| gnomefreak | otherwise i would | 19:41 |
| gnomefreak | i dont think so | 19:41 |
| gnomefreak | if i remember the command i will add mt that should be fairly easy | 19:41 |
| gnomefreak | !freenode | 19:42 |
| ubot2 | freenode is the IRC network that you're on! See http://freenode.net/faq.shtml. freenode has policies that govern how people should use the network which can be read at http://freenode.net/policy.shtml. The ubuntu channels on freenode also have their own !guidelines | 19:42 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: because I can change topic | 19:42 |
| gnomefreak | micahg: you are admin i though | 19:42 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: not IRC admin | 19:42 |
| gnomefreak | or i dont have the topic locked | 19:42 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: tis ok, isn't abused AFAIK | 19:42 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| gnomefreak | i dont have topic locked. if it gets abused i can add it | 19:45 |
| chrisccoulson | i've only just noticed that the tab bar in FF4 is animated | 19:52 |
| gnomefreak | chrisccoulson: does it install xulrunner-2.0 packages? | 19:52 |
| chrisccoulson | gnomefreak, not since last week | 19:52 |
| micahg | \o/ starred folders w/new messages back in TB3.1 | 19:52 |
| chrisccoulson | nice! | 19:53 |
| gnomefreak | i cant find info on it at all | 19:53 |
| gnomefreak | i was looking for upstream info | 19:53 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: did you fix the apparmor goof as well? | 19:54 |
| fta | chrisccoulson, done | 19:55 |
| fta | my adsl connection sucks again :( | 19:55 |
| chrisccoulson | fta - thank you :) | 19:55 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - whats wrong with apparmor? | 19:55 |
| jdstrand | ? | 19:55 |
| micahg | http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/476562/ | 19:56 |
| jdstrand | my name is associated with that, but I have made not 4.0 commits | 19:58 |
| jdstrand | s/not/no/ | 19:58 |
| jdstrand | micahg: can you paste /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox-4.0? | 19:58 |
| micahg | http://pastebin.com/TUYAKSr1 | 19:58 |
| chrisccoulson | oh, that's probably me | 19:59 |
| chrisccoulson | i'll fix that | 19:59 |
| jdstrand | usr/lib/firefox-4.0b4pre/** ixr, | 19:59 |
| jdstrand | ^ that needs to be an absolute path | 19:59 |
| chrisccoulson | that's fixed already in one of this afternoons commits | 20:01 |
| chrisccoulson | i caused both of those problems ;) | 20:02 |
| micahg | ugh, 4hr build queue | 20:03 |
| chrisccoulson | people will have to wait a bit longer for working FF4 then | 20:03 |
| chrisccoulson | meanwhile, i will continue to enjoy it on my laptop here whilst everyone else waits ;) | 20:04 |
| micahg | heh, well, I've got TB 3.1.2 on my laptop :P | 20:04 |
| jdstrand | chrisccoulson: so, I am getting close to making some apparmor profile changes. 4.0 i sgoing into maverick when? | 20:04 |
| micahg | jdstrand: never! | 20:04 |
| chrisccoulson | jdstrand, 4.0 won't be going in to maverick ;) | 20:04 |
| micahg | :) | 20:04 |
| jdstrand | oh | 20:04 |
| jdstrand | ok | 20:04 |
| chrisccoulson | it's maverick +1 | 20:05 |
| chrisccoulson | but we still need to keep it maintained | 20:05 |
| micahg | probably 4.1 or 4.5 | 20:05 |
| chrisccoulson | it took quite a while for me to bring it up to date over the last few days | 20:05 |
| jdstrand | chrisccoulson: so I'll still commit to 3.6.head then and 4.0 after | 20:05 |
| chrisccoulson | jdstrand, sure, that's ok | 20:05 |
| jdstrand | cool, thanks | 20:05 |
| fta | linux/beta (5.0.375.125 -> 6.0.472.33) | 20:14 |
| fta | uhuh | 20:14 |
| micahg | fta: major releases every 6 weeks now :) | 20:15 |
| chrisccoulson | right, i'm off for a bit to get some dinner | 20:20 |
| [reed] | how does one request that a package get rebuilt to fix dependency problems? | 20:23 |
| [reed] | er, I guess I should ask in #ubuntu-devel | 20:23 |
| [reed] | well, nobody is answering there, so I'll accept answers here! | 20:29 |
| gnomefreak | im waiting for mutter/gnomeshell to get fixed | 20:29 |
| gnomefreak | firefox is ugly with default theme | 20:31 |
| gnomefreak | i like the dark theme only the section where address bar and tabs are a beige color | 20:35 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| micahg | gnomefreak: what's wrong with gnome-shell? | 20:45 |
| gnomefreak | micahg: doesnt install due to mutter depends | 20:45 |
| gnomefreak | mutter needed to be rebuilt yesterday i heard | 20:46 |
| gnomefreak | im using ppa version | 20:46 |
| * gnomefreak also thought pidgin was default :) | 20:48 | |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| chrisccoulson | [reed], what package do you have problems with? (unless someone already answered your question) | 21:35 |
| fta | i think i'll skip this new stable update: http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/2010/08/stable-channel-update.html | 21:35 |
| fta | the source code is not available where it usually is | 21:36 |
| fta | and upstream doesn't seem to want to answer my questions about it | 21:36 |
| chrisccoulson | [reed] - no worries, i see that it was already answered | 21:36 |
| chrisccoulson | fta - if it's just updated flash, then it makes sense to not update | 21:37 |
| fta | yep | 21:37 |
| fta | it's one of the files we don't have access to anyway | 21:37 |
| fta | (that and the pdf plugin) | 21:38 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - i might branch the awesome-browser branding for FF4.0 | 23:00 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: do we need new files? | 23:00 |
| chrisccoulson | i've already had to patch it today,and i've just noticed that Help->About doesn't work in abrowser, which needs another change | 23:00 |
| chrisccoulson | it needs new strings, but i also had to patch the jar.mn files today as well | 23:01 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: k, if it's the stuff in the branch changing, go for it | 23:01 |
| * micahg hasn't touched that | 23:02 | |
| chrisccoulson | cool, i'll do that later | 23:02 |
| * micahg actually doesn't know what's in that branch :) | 23:02 | |
| chrisccoulson | other than that, ff4 is working well again | 23:03 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: is the version in the PPA good now? | 23:06 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - yeah, i just tried the amd64 build. with the exception of the preferences going in the wrong place (/etc/@APPNAME), it's fine | 23:07 |
| chrisccoulson | (but that will fix itself on the next build, and it will work for upgraders still) | 23:07 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: I've been using TB3.1 for 4 hours and memory usage has ballooned, but it seems stabel | 23:12 |
| micahg | could just be the indexing | 23:12 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!