/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/08/12/#launchpad.txt

=== fta_ is now known as fta
michaelh1Hi there.  Is there a tool to upload release files from the command line, preferably with resuming?00:36
michaelh1I saw https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/41204 for a hardcore version...00:37
jelmermichaelh1: There are some Launchpad command line utilities, it might be useful to add a command to those00:38
jelmermichaelh1: I don't think that has happened yet though00:38
james_wmichaelh1: there's one in ubuntu-dev-tools that doesn't have resuming00:38
james_w(I doubt resuming can be implemented given the interface LP currently exports)00:39
jelmerjames_w: ah, cool, wasn't aware of that one00:39
jelmermichaelh1: fwiw, it's called lp-project-upload00:39
* michaelh1 reads...00:40
pooliethere's a script in bzr's source tree too00:41
poolieit's a bit dodgy00:41
pooliehello to all of you00:41
* jelmer waves to poolie00:41
michaelh1Right.  Will play.  It's a 100 MB GCC release so we'll see how it goes00:43
=== qwebirc23867 is now known as lavid
=== fta_ is now known as fta
lavidhello. question about recipes to automate building. i imagine i need some debian dpkg special sauce somewhere for this all to properly work. do i need to make a new branch that contains that stuff (dependencies, etc) and then do something like merge packaging lp:~rawtherapee/rawtherapee/packaging, yes? are there any fully functional examples of using recipes where the debian stuff is merged in from a branch?01:04
lavidoh, and this is what i have thusfar: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~rawtherapee/+recipe/rawtherapee-staging01:05
wgrantlavid: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~wgrant/+recipe/ivle-trunk is one of mine.01:12
wgrantlavid: The debian-packaging branch is a branch of trunk with debian/ added.01:13
=== fta_ is now known as fta
=== mwhudson_ is now known as mwhudson
=== fta_ is now known as fta
LifeIsPainI now have access to the SF tracker for a project and so started closing bugs which should have been closed earlier, the launchpad bugs that are associated with these bugs aren't then getting updated, upon clicking on the status, they each read:02:18
LifeIsPainThe information about this bug in Launchpad is automatically pulled daily from the remote bug. This information was last pulled on 2010-07-14.02:18
LifeIsPainso is the launchpad remote bug tracker slightly foobar with sf?02:19
=== Cepheus|Away is now known as Cepheus
=== fta_ is now known as fta
nhandlerHow do I go about removing translations for a series so that the series can be deleted?03:17
nhandlerNever mind, I figured it out.03:19
=== fta_ is now known as fta
=== fta_ is now known as fta
MTecknologyWhy do recipes tack on ~lucid1 or ~karmic2 or w/e04:49
MTecknologyI get what they mean - I'm just wondering if those being optional tags might be better?04:49
MTecknologyLike.. {debupstream}-ppa{upload} or {debupstream}~{ubuntuversion}{upload}04:50
MTecknologyMight make things much more flexible. Personally - I don't get why those should need to be there. If you're uploading to different versions..04:50
MTecknologyI think I kind of get it - but I'm not a huge fan04:51
micahgMTecknology: you can only have 1 version of something in a repo even in a different pocket04:52
=== Cepheus is now known as Cepheus|Away
MTecknologymicahg: does it work the same in ubuntu too? You can't have the same version if the packages are different?04:58
micahgMTecknology: correct04:59
MTecknologymicahg: how do you deal with that if the source version and everything are the same but the debian/ needs to change a little?04:59
micahgMTecknology: you build a 0.XX.XX.1 where XX.XX is the previous release in UBuntu at least05:00
MTecknologyoh05:01
micahgMTecknology: in PPA, ~lucid1 and such05:01
MTecknologyI wish launchpad recipes supported commands. I would love to just rm one file and sed one other - then the 0.7 debian would work for 0.805:01
micahgMTecknology: here's a wiki on versioning in Ubuntu: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdatePreparation#Update%20the%20packaging05:01
MTecknologymicahg: thanks05:02
MTecknologymicahg: would it be a bad idea to maybe request a feature that you can omit the ubuntu version part and build the same binary for multiple versions?05:03
micahgMTecknology: probably05:04
MTecknologyoh05:04
MTecknologyAny reason?05:04
micahgw/o Ubuntu version it steps on the debian build versions05:04
=== fta_ is now known as fta
MTecknologymicahg: I meant so you could do something like {debupstream}ppa{upload}05:05
micahgMTecknology: sounds like a bad idea05:05
MTecknologymicahg: :(05:06
micahgtry a dpkg --compare-versions on that and {debupstream}-1 and you'll see the issue05:08
MTecknologymicahg: I was thinking {debupstream} usually has the -1 or -0 in it when I look at them - but I guess the uncommon case05:13
MTecknologymicahg: in that case it'd be  {debupstream}-0ppa{upload}05:13
micahgthat might work05:13
MTecknologyThen just the same thing as telling launchpad to copy binary for versions05:13
micahgwell, recipes shouldn't be based on a debian version, but rather the upstream project version IMHO05:14
MTecknologyI'm trying to make them very easily build nginx packages05:14
micahgMTecknology: well, if debian/rules will be differnt for each release, you need a rebuild05:24
MTecknologymicahg: yup - but this won't need to be05:27
MTecknologymicahg: aside from one patch that needs to be removed - I can take the lenny debian/ for nginx 0.7.x and use it in maverick to build nginx 0.8.x05:28
micahgMTecknology: the point is the source needs to be rebuilt each for each series05:31
MTecknologymicahg: As opposed to having it build for lucid and copy binary to maverick?05:33
micahgMTecknology: right05:33
MTecknologymicahg: I know it needs to now - I just don't think it makes sense05:34
MTecknologymicahg: else I could just have daily builds - then maually go out to LP and copy binary and have the same effect - except that ~lucid1 would be part of the version number in maverick05:35
micahgMTecknology: the libraries it's linked to are different in each series aren't they?05:36
MTecknologymicahg: not that I know of05:38
MTecknologymicahg: like I said - I can use the exact same debian/ - I can grab a .deb from lenny and toss it on maverisk05:38
MTecknologys/sk/ck/05:38
LifeIsPainok, from my previous question, I now see that https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/bugtrackers/sf has been disabled, which explains why none of them had been updated05:42
MTecknology!info nginx05:42
ubot5nginx (source: nginx): small, but very powerful and efficient web server and mail proxy. In component universe, is optional. Version 0.7.65-1ubuntu2 (lucid), package size 327 kB, installed size 800 kB05:42
micahgMTecknology: work yes, ideal, probably not05:43
MTecknologymicahg: it just seems like a waste to me05:44
micahgMTecknology: you take advantage of compiler optimizations in the toolchain and any other advantages from the libraries in the release05:45
twbSo launchpad is 100% Affero GPL'd now, right?05:50
=== Ursinha-bbl is now known as Ursinha
twbAre there any deployments other than Canonical's?05:50
lifelessLP is AGPL yes05:51
mwhudsoni saw a link to one somewhere05:51
MTecknologytwb: I was going to try but gave up realizing it'd never work :P05:51
lifelesswe're aware of a couple05:51
MTecknologyonly internal stuff though05:52
lifelessyou need to rebrand it - the icon artwork is (IIRC) trademarked05:52
lifelessMTecknology: well, its not entirely clear whether they are all internal deployments ;)05:52
twbIs there a turnkey way to do that, or do you need to grovel through the tarball?05:52
lifelessbut we have folk that pop up and tell us when things are broken05:52
lifelesstwb: I'm not aware of a specific turnkey way, no - but it should be as simple as replacing the icing, so fairly easy.05:53
MTecknologyBuild will start in 4sec06:29
MTecknologyYou mean 4 hours?06:29
MTecknologyI'm excited to see the changes being made06:31
=== fta_ is now known as fta
=== spm changed the topic of #launchpad to: Launchpad down/read-only from 0800-0930 UTC for a code update | http://launchpad.net/ | Read https://help.launchpad.net/ for help | Help contact: - | Join https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | Launchpad is open source: https://dev.launchpad.net/
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-zzz
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
=== henninge changed the topic of #launchpad to: Launchpad down/read-only from 0800-0930 UTC for a code update | http://launchpad.net/ | Read https://help.launchpad.net/ for help | Help contact: henninge | Join https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | Launchpad is open source: https://dev.launchpad.net/
=== bpeel_away is now known as bpeel
=== henninge_ is now known as henninge
=== oubiwann is now known as oubiwann-away
=== oubiwann-away is now known as oubiwann
=== henninge changed the topic of #launchpad to: Launchpad is currently down/read-only until 0930 UTC for a code update | http://launchpad.net/ | Read https://help.launchpad.net/ for help | Help contact: henninge | Join https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | Launchpad is open source: https://dev.launchpad.net/
dholbachare we there yet? :-P09:52
spmdholbach: you'll get a smacked bottom with questions like that; :-) Not yet, but progressing well.09:53
twb"Pipe down or I'll turn this migration around RIGHT NOW and we'll rollback straight home"09:54
* dholbach hugs spm and twb :)09:54
twbcooties!09:54
nigelb"Are we there yet?" hahaha09:56
* bilalakhtar wishes spm and twb good luck10:29
* bilalakhtar smacks dholbach 10:29
* dholbach strangles bilalakhtar :)10:29
bilalakhtarAre we near?10:29
* bilalakhtar kicks dholbach 10:29
bilalakhtarenough!10:30
dholbachbilalakhtar: I guess we better stay quiet in the back :)10:30
bilalakhtardholbach: yup, nothing to do until lp is back10:30
bilalakhtarLP IS UP!10:30
spmparts *may* be up - the rollout isn't (yet) complete10:30
bigjoolswe need a launchpad-release-party channel10:33
dholbachbigjools: HAHAHA10:33
bigjoolscomplete with smackdown bot10:33
=== spm changed the topic of #launchpad to: http://launchpad.net/ | Read https://help.launchpad.net/ for help | Help contact: henninge | Join https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | Launchpad is open source: https://dev.launchpad.net/
Laneyshould I be able to edit the status of packaging branch merge proposals?10:49
dholbachspm (and everybody else): good work!11:01
henningeLaney: Does your problem still exist or was it related to Launchpad being read-only until 30 minutes ago?11:19
nigelbyay, we're there!11:20
* nigelb hugs spm and others :)11:20
nigelbbigjools: totally agree on the release channel.11:21
henningeonly that we are working to get rid of releases ... ;)11:21
Laneyhenninge: It's still there, but I don't know if it's a problem11:21
Laneyhttps://code.edge.launchpad.net/~arky/ubuntu/lucid/sysinfo/fix-524120/+merge/19746 ← I want to edit the status of this merge proposal11:22
nigelbhahaha, we can still say "is it out yet"11:22
henningeLaney: What's your relationship to the proposal? It does not look lile you are either the submitter or on the reviewer team.11:24
spmLaney: huh. lookin'....11:24
Laneyhenninge: I can upload to the target11:24
Laneyso I figure I should be able to twiddle the bits11:25
henningeHm, I am not sure.11:26
spmI'd suggest per henninge's - it doesn't look like you have the perms to ok the branch for merging; only james does aiui.11:27
* spm has been ordered into lunch...11:27
wgrantIt's a sort of bug.11:28
wgrantSort of.11:28
wgrantFor Ubuntu, the uploaders probably should be able to review.11:28
Laneyit's probably complicated as the target is lucid...11:28
wgrantBut they can't.11:28
Laneywgrant: Is there a bug# for this?11:29
LaneyI thought I filed a similar bug in the past11:30
henningewgrant: "uploaders" means "being able to push to branches"?11:31
Laneybug 540250 is the one I filed a while ago11:32
ubot5Launchpad bug 540250 in Launchpad Bazaar Integration "Cannot edit merge proposals for packaging branches (affected: 1, heat: 1)" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/54025011:32
henningeso, is this a regression?11:33
Laneylet me find another branch11:33
Laneyhenninge: No. I can edit lp:ubuntu/xxx proposals it seems.11:34
Laneyoh, hang on...11:36
wgrantBug #612391?11:37
ubot5Launchpad bug 612391 in Launchpad Bazaar Integration "Cannot change status for merge proposals that target a released series (affected: 1, heat: 6)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/61239111:37
Laney*can* I actually push to lp:ubuntu/lucid/foo? Is that an alias for proposed?11:37
Laneylooks right, good find11:37
wgrantNo, that's the release pocket.11:39
wgrantIt is read-only.11:39
LaneyCould/should something be done with merge proposals like that?11:41
* henninge lunches12:06
=== salgado-afk is now known as salgado
paultagHey LPers. Can I I use lplib to pull data from the build farm for PPAs?13:13
mrevellAny soyuz guys around to answer paultag?13:18
bigjoolspaultag: what sort of data?13:19
paultagbigjools, basic status and cosmetics. Nothing major. I do PPA builds once in a while and as a fun little app-let I wanted to make something to track the builds. "Time" left, arches, and after they are done, a build log13:20
bigjoolspaultag: yes, you can do all that then.13:20
paultagbigjools, any documentation you can point me to?13:20
bigjoolsthe best place to start is https://help.launchpad.net/API13:20
paultagbigjools, I'm quite familiar with lplib overall13:21
paultagbigjools, do you have the sub-page related to the buildfarm?13:21
bigjoolsok, have you looked at http://edge.launchpad.net/+apidoc13:21
bigjoolsthe "buildfarm" doesn't have an API as such, you need to traverse from the context archive you're interested in13:21
paultagyeah bigjools, but this is all for the raw interface. I hate guessing the interface for lplib13:21
paultagHumm13:21
bigjoolsthat doc is the best thing to use, it's not too hard to go from there to lplib13:22
bigjoolsI'll give you an example to start with13:22
paultagbigjools, that'll help a ton, thanks13:22
bigjoolsyou know how get get an archive?13:23
bigjools(aka a PPA)13:24
paultagbigjools, I've never tried, but it must be under the person object, yeah?13:24
bigjoolsyes, it has an archive property for the default archive, or you can call getPPAByName()13:25
paultagbigjools, cool, that should not be an issue13:25
bigjoolsor there's a "ppas" property for a collection of all PPAs13:25
bigjoolsthen you can call getBuildRecords() on the archive13:25
bigjoolsor getPublishedSources()13:26
bigjoolsthis is trivially easy in lplib :)13:26
paultagbigjools, I'll do my homework, thanks! :)13:26
bigjoolssomething like launchpad.me.ppa will ewven work13:26
=== oubiwann is now known as oubiwann-away
=== oubiwann-away is now known as oubiwann
=== PsyTrance_ is now known as PsyTrance
maxbpaultag: http://paste.ubuntu.com/476928/ may give you some ideas14:05
maxbIt is a script I use to promote packages from one PPA to another when they have built on all architectures14:05
paultagmaxb, that rocks, thanks!14:06
paultagOne of these days I'll put together an archive with all the examples I've polled for14:06
maxbI can paste you my lputil module that that paste imports you like, but that's just generic launchpadlib stuff14:06
paultagmaxb, sure14:07
maxboh, actually it does have one soyuz function at the end: http://paste.ubuntu.com/476929/14:07
=== matsubara-afk is now known as matsubara
* paultag hugs maxb14:08
paultagthanks!14:08
=== Ursinha-zzz is now known as Ursinha
shadeslayerjelmer: thanks mate ;)14:25
jdubyo gang14:41
jdubis this the most sensible place to ask about recipes?14:42
henningejdub: I think it is, maybe somebody from them soyuz team can help you.14:43
jdubi'm getting the impression it's bleeding edge stuff, based on intriguing lack of docs ;)14:44
jdubnow i know how to write one... how do i submit/commit a recipe? :-)14:44
henningewell, it is a fairly new feature, yes.14:44
MTecknologyjdub: Are you in ~launchpad-dev? I think you need to be to use it decently14:46
jdub*ah*14:46
MTecknologyhttps://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev14:46
jdubthat would explain the lack of things to push and prod!14:46
MTecknologyI'm pretty sure that's the one you need to be in - then you'll be using launchpad edge - which means you get the latest and greatest14:47
jdubyeha14:47
henningeMTecknology, jdub: We just rolled out today so edge is currently identical to production.14:48
jduboh14:48
jdubhmm14:49
jdubwhere should i expect to see a link to ~TEAM/+recipes ?14:49
noodles775jdub: if you push a branch and look at it, you'll should see a link for creating a recipe.14:50
* noodles775 checks14:50
jduband where/how do i edit/submit/commit a recipe?14:50
henningeMTecknology: and the team is ~launchpad-beta-testers but anybody can simply add "edge" to the url and use it.14:50
MTecknologyhenninge: oh.. so that's the one.. thanks14:50
MTecknologyI was just thinking, I don't see kiko around much14:51
henningeMTecknology: He is not on Launchpad any more.14:51
henningeI mean, on the team.14:51
MTecknologyhenninge: oh14:51
jdub<- not logged in to edge. ha ha. grr.14:51
henningeMTecknology: http://www.linaro.org/management-team/14:52
MTecknologyhenninge: oh14:53
sjamaanjelmer: Hi, thanks for restarting the import of Chicken. However, this project moved to a new server. I put a link to the new repo in the Whiteboard at https://code.launchpad.net/~chicken/chicken/git-mirror15:22
nessitahello people! does anyone know why launchpad says that "pycasa-download@googlegroups.com  isn't a valid email address."?15:23
henningenessita: where are you trying to use it?15:23
sjamaannessita: Is that a trailing space?15:24
henningesjamaan: good point ;)15:24
nessitasjamaan: d'oh!15:24
nessitasjamaan: feel free to insult me :-)15:24
sjamaannessita: Actually, the code should probably handle that sort of thing gracefully by trimming the input15:25
nessitasjamaan: yeah, makes sense15:25
henningenessita: what sjamaan said. Can you file a bug, please=15:25
henninge?15:25
nessitahenninge: yes of course!15:25
henningesjamaan: or maybe check if one exists for it already ... ;-)15:25
jelmersjamaan: I'll update it, thanks.15:26
sjamaanthanks :)15:27
nessitasjamaan, henninge: https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/61683415:29
ubot5Launchpad bug 616834 in Launchpad itself "Spaces should be trimmed from email addresses before validation (affected: 1, heat: 6)" [Undecided,New]15:29
henningenessita: thank you15:29
sjamaan:)15:29
nessitasince we're at it, could anyone help me with the following: I've submitted a package as per https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-sso-client/0.99-0ubuntu1, and the page reports "Uploaded by: pycassos". Pycassos is a team I belong to but has nothing to do with the ubuntu-sso-client project15:30
nessitaI've noticed I've used natalia.bidart@gmail.com for building the package, and I have nataliabidart@gmail.com registered on LP. Maybe that generates the confusion?15:31
henningenessita: you should be more careful with email addresses.15:32
nessitahenninge: I see that now :-) How can I fix this?15:32
nessitaI've tried adding natalia.bidart@gmail.com to my profile but I get this error:15:33
henningeLaunchpad bug reports and also the channel logs here on freende are public, so they can easily be harvested by spammers ... ;-)15:33
henningenessita: what I mean! :-/ Stop putting all your email addresses in public places!15:33
nessitahenninge: well, I put this email address everywhere, but ok, I'll stop.15:34
henningenessita: ;-)15:34
henningenessita: what ever you like, I was just worried for your mailbox ... ;)15:34
nessitaso, the error I've got was "The email address 'x.y@example.com' is already registered to pycassos. If you think that is a duplicated account, you can merge it into your account."15:34
nessitabut I couldn't complete the merge either15:35
henningenessita: so, do you have different lp accounts?15:36
nessitahenninge: not that I know of, but I might mistakenly registered some while testing the new SSO GTK interface15:36
nessitahenninge: I can try retrieving passwords15:37
sjamaanjelmer: Yet another error cropped up. Any idea if this is another bug or just a config issue?  http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53560977/chicken-chicken-git-mirror.log15:37
nessitahenninge: is LP using the Ubuntu SSO accounts?15:37
henningenessita: yes15:37
henningenessita: Launchpad creates inactive accounts when it encounters an email address that it has no account for, like when importing translations.15:38
henningenessita: so there may be an account for an address of yours which you did not create yourself.15:39
nessitahenninge: ok, I just confirmed that there is an account for the x.y email15:39
jelmersjamaan: It's a bug that has already been fixed upstream; I'll ask thumper if we can roll it out soon, as it appears to be affecting quite a few of the http git repos.15:39
sjamaanjelmer: A different bug, in a different component?15:40
henningenessita: interestingly, searching for the x.y email address brings up the pycassos team ...15:41
nessitahenninge: I might added that x.y email to that team, I use those emails a lot, like they were the same15:41
nessitaxy@... and x.y@...15:41
henningeyes15:41
jelmersjamaan: Different bug, same component.15:42
nessitahenninge: so, I should change the email in pycassos and close the x.y account?15:42
henningenessita: which is the x.y account?15:42
jelmersjamaan: HTTP Git repositories are relatively rare, and this appears to be an issue with the way in which some HTTP servers deal with directories.15:42
sjamaanjelmer: Is it possible to get a notification when this bugfix is rolled out on production?15:43
nessitahenninge: the x.y account is a SSO account, and I might registered that email (x.y) with pycassos15:43
henningehm, I think there is some LP - SSO entanglement going on here. Looks like a bug somehow, nessita.15:44
jelmersjamaan: Yeah, I can let you know.15:45
nessitahenninge: ok, I'll chase some SSO gurus :-)15:45
sjamaanjelmer: I'd appreciate that15:45
nessitahenninge: thanks for your help!15:45
henningenessita: thanks, right in time for me going off... ;-)15:46
=== henninge changed the topic of #launchpad to: http://launchpad.net/ | Read https://help.launchpad.net/ for help | Help contact: - | Join https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | Launchpad is open source: https://dev.launchpad.net/
nessitahenninge: enjoy!15:46
henningethanks :)15:46
MTecknologyhenninge: Can I not mark that you answerred my question?15:58
henningeMTecknology: no, then the LOSAs won't pick up on it. They will mark it answered.15:58
MTecknologyhenninge: I marked it answered - I just recall you used to be able to mark who solved it.15:59
henningeMTecknology: thanks for caring about my karma! ;) I re-opened the question for the reason mentioned above..16:07
* henninge has to go now ;)16:07
henningeBye!16:07
plundraHow the hell do you pull the source from a launchpad-thingomajig?! Without having an account, that is. I just want to pull and follow changes, not push anything.16:11
=== deryck is now known as deryck[lunch]
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-lunch
shadeslayerhow much time should i wait when copying packages from one ppa to another?16:19
shadeslayerit said delayed copy of packages :(16:19
Green00000hi16:19
shadeslayerGreen00000: hi :)16:19
Green00000there is no more ubuntu-shipping support ........ and i used launchpad only for this ....... how can i delet my account?????????16:21
bigjoolsshadeslayer: it does that when you copy between private / non-private16:23
bigjoolsit'll take up to 15 mins16:24
shadeslayerbigjools: ah thanks :D16:24
shadeslayerand yeah was copying b/w private and non-private :)16:25
Green00000there is no more ubuntu-shipping support ........ and i used launchpad only for this ....... how can i delet my account?????????16:27
Green00000there is no more ubuntu-shipping support ........ and i used launchpad only for this ....... how can i delete my account?????????16:30
MTecknology!repeat > Green0000016:31
ubot5Green00000, please see my private message16:31
MTecknologyGreen00000: in your account page, click change details, read the page16:35
Green00000okay.16:36
Green00000okay.16:37
Green00000thx.16:37
Green00000:)16:37
Green00000bb.16:42
MTecknologyAny ideas what broke on this recipe build? http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53564608/buildlog.txt.gz16:50
bigjoolsMTecknology: it tells you in the log file16:58
MTecknologybigjools: dpkg-source: error: can't build with source format '3.0 (quilt)': no orig.tar file found16:59
=== deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck
=== matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch
MTecknologybigjools: dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy: Is this part relevant?17:05
MTecknologybigjools: What am I missing? :(17:07
bigjoolsMTecknology: not sure, sorry, I'm not too familiar with recipes yet17:08
bigjoolsjames_w might know17:08
MTecknologyalrighty :)17:09
MTecknologyWe're kind of lost17:09
MTecknologyLucid: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53564967/buildlog.txt.gz & Maverick: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53564608/buildlog.txt.gz17:09
jdubis maverick currently having problems with recipe builds?17:09
* shadeslayer looks17:09
shadeslayernot for Qt17:09
jdubit's not the partial depends bit17:09
jdubit's the failure of dpkg-source17:09
shadeslayeri just built qt-kde in a ppa with recipe17:09
jdubit doesn't successfully build a source package17:10
shadeslayerdude... dpkg-source: error: can't build with source format '3.0 (quilt)': no orig.tar file found17:10
shadeslayeryou need the orignal code in lp as well :P17:10
jdubyes, the same happens in the successful lucid build17:10
jdubbecause recipes don't build with orig tarballs17:10
jdubthe recipe builder creates native source17:11
shadeslayerlemme look17:11
jdubthus my question above -> perhaps there is a problem with dpkg-source in maverick (or somehow we're tweaking a recipe builder bug)17:12
MTecknologyBoth logs are basically the same until dpkg-source: error: can't build with source format '3.0 (quilt)': no orig.tar file found17:12
=== Cepheus|Away is now known as Cepheus
shadeslayerim taking a look at the package i built17:13
shadeslayerhttp://launchpadlibrarian.net/53561315/buildlog_ubuntu-maverick-amd64.project-neon-qt_1.0%2B1200~maverick1_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz17:14
shadeslayerMTecknology: how did you trigger the build?17:14
MTecknologyshadeslayer: asking the recipe to build17:14
shadeslayerweb ui?17:14
dendrobatesI need to make some changes to a launchpad team and cannot figure out where to do it...17:14
MTecknologyya17:15
dendrobates~openstack grants membership in ~nova and ~swift17:15
dendrobatesI want to reverse it and have membership in ~nova and ~swift give you membership in ~openstack17:15
dendrobatesany hints?17:16
shadeslayeraha!17:16
shadeslayerMTecknology: dpkg-source: warning: source directory 'recipe-0.8.49+time' is not <sourcepackage>-<upstreamversion> 'nginx-0.8.49+time~lucid1'17:16
shadeslayeruse something else than time17:16
MTecknologyshadeslayer: that same string worked in lucid thoguh17:16
MTecknologyshadeslayer: I did change it though17:16
shadeslayeruh no...17:16
=== salgado is now known as salgado-lunch
shadeslayerMTecknology: lucid ftbfs you pointed to http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53564967/buildlog.txt.gz17:17
MTecknologyshadeslayer: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~nginx/+recipe/nginx-development17:17
shadeslayerdude ...17:17
shadeslayerthats not the actual build17:17
jdubshadeslayer: that's not a ftbfs, that's a successful recipe build17:17
shadeslayerthats just the upload17:18
shadeslayerjdub: yep17:18
MTecknologyshadeslayer: but the build log is there17:18
jdubthe problem with the maverick one is that it's an unsuccessful *recipe* build17:18
shadeslayerah right17:18
jdublucid recipe completed, uploaded and built17:18
dendrobatesnm, figured it out17:18
MTecknologygranted the package itself actually fails to build..17:19
MTecknologybut that's an issue that comes after the recipe builds17:19
shadeslayerMTecknology: i thought it was a FTBFS issue ... didnt realise its a recipe issue :P17:19
MTecknologyshadeslayer: np - I'm wondering if there's any chance of a bug with building recipes for maverick or if it's just me17:20
shadeslayerno idea on that..17:21
jelmershadeslayer: You're welcome.17:23
jelmershadeslayer: the imports of the KDE repository are still slow, but at least they're working.17:23
shadeslayeryeah :)17:23
jelmershadeslayer: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~vcs-imports/kdelibs/kde417:23
shadeslayerjelmer: that is already bookmarked :P17:23
shadeslayeri keep checking after every half an hour17:23
jelmerhehe17:24
shadeslayerjelmer: so bzr finds a particular set of revisions, imports them and then continues from there again?17:24
jelmershadeslayer: you're unlucky the current run wasn't scheduled on pear, it's much faster than the other import machines.17:24
jelmershadeslayer: yeah17:24
shadeslayerah ok ... because i see loads of Imports ... so was curious17:25
shadeslayerbah.. :P17:25
jelmershadeslayer: the import size is currently set to 1k revisions, but this number can probably be increased.17:25
jelmershadeslayer: we don't import all revisions at the same time because that would prevent all other imports from running. This way we do 1k revisions and then schedule a new job for the next 1000.17:26
jelmershadeslayer: (originally it also had to do with memory leaks, but they're mostly gone now)17:26
shadeslayersound logic :)17:26
shadeslayerhow come pear is faster? :)17:27
shadeslayerdifferent connections? or configs?17:27
jelmershadeslayer: better hardware17:27
shadeslayerjelmer: btw how much of code is mirrored @ LP ?17:28
* shadeslayer thinks of LP as beast 17:28
jelmerhttps://code.launchpad.net/ has some stats17:28
shadeslayerdoesnt say how much space it takes up :P17:29
jelmeroh, I don't know how much that is17:32
jelmerThe Launchpad code folks would know.17:32
dendrobatesis it possible to have nested project groups?17:46
jelmerdendrobates: As far as I know, we don't support nesting project groups.17:47
dendrobatesI would like to have the openstack project contain an openstack-client project group that already contains 4 projects17:47
dendrobatesah17:47
dendrobatesdo you have a suggestion for large projects that contain many subcomponents developed separately17:48
=== Ursinha-lunch is now known as Ursinha
=== matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara
=== beuno is now known as beuno-lunch
bdrungcan someone move https://code.launchpad.net/~vcs-imports/vlc/master to the ~videolan team?18:07
bdrungand this https://code.launchpad.net/~vcs-imports/vlc/old-trunk too?18:08
rockstardendrobates, unfortunately, no.  It's pretty flat as it is now.  :(18:11
shadeslayerhi, https://edge.launchpad.net/~kubuntu-ppa/+archive/beta shows one package18:18
shadeslayerbut https://edge.launchpad.net/~kubuntu-ppa/+archive/beta/+packages shows so many18:18
shadeslayerphooey18:18
shadeslayernvm18:18
jelmerbdrung: You do realize that both branches have been suspended?18:19
bdrungjelmer: yes. the next thing i want to ask is a retry for https://code.launchpad.net/~vcs-imports/vlc/master - i want to build a daily PPA based on that import18:21
jelmerbdrung: That's still going to fail as Bazaar does not support nested trees yet.18:23
jelmerbdrung: To change their ownership, please file a question in https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad-code18:23
bdrungjelmer: not good.18:23
=== salgado-lunch is now known as salgado
bdrungjelmer: question filed18:26
bdrungjelmer: when will Bazaar support nested trees?18:26
MethsCan't you use a recipe to simulate the nested tree thing?18:28
james_wMTecknology: bug 61476818:28
ubot5Launchpad bug 614768 in bzr-builder "Unable to build dpkg v3 (quilt) packages (affected: 4, heat: 24)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/61476818:28
jelmerbdrung: I don't know what the current plans are, the Bazaar list is probably the best place for that question (bazaar@lists.ubuntu.com)18:28
MethsNeed to find the page I saw the instructions on now...18:28
MethsUse merge  https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/SourceBuilds/Recipes18:30
jelmerMeths: You can use recipes to work around the lack of nested tree support in your own branches, but that won't make it possible for git imports with submodules to work.18:32
maxbbdrung: Are you asking just for the sake of organizational naming? Because I don't think the team of a vcs import branch matters much, permission wise, other than who can delete it18:33
Methsjelmer: noted.18:33
bdrungmaxb: permission wise18:46
MTecknologyjames_w: thanks19:05
=== beuno-lunch is now known as beuno
=== BlackZ_ is now known as BlackZ
daveisadorkhey, i have a package recipe that builds fine for karmic and lucid but fails for maverick...20:22
daveisadorkthe difference in the logs being at the point after all the packages are installed20:23
daveisadorka successful build says "All changes applied successfully. Committing to: ..."20:23
daveisadorkthe failed build says "All changes applied successfully. bzr: ERROR: Unable to determine your name."20:24
=== dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk
thumperdaveisadork: thanks, it is a bug21:26
daveisadorkthumper: should i report it or attach the recipe/logs somewhere?21:39
thumperdaveisadork: I'm talking through the bug with rockstar right now21:39
thumperdaveisadork: file a bug though21:39
daveisadorkok, thanks21:39
thumperdaveisadork: if you like21:39
rockstardaveisadork, do you have a buildlog?21:39
daveisadorkyes21:39
daveisadorkhttp://launchpadlibrarian.net/53568457/buildlog.txt.gz21:40
=== Ng_ is now known as Ng
=== cody-somerville_ is now known as cody-somerville
=== matsubara_ is now known as matsubara-afk
=== dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates
rockstardaveisadork, did you end up filing a bug?23:02
=== bpeel is now known as bpeel_away
bdrungdoes the daily build already work (e.g. https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~audacity-team/+recipe/daily)?23:04
wgrantbdrung: Daily builds are currently disabled, after a bug was discovered last week.23:05
wgrantBut that bug is fixed, so they should be turned back on soon.23:05
bdrunggreat.23:06
bdrungso one of > 3 daily builds work.23:06
wgrantWhere are the failures?23:08
=== jpds_ is now known as jpds
bdrungwgrant: bzr import fails. e.g. vlc and xmms2 - missing nested support23:12
wgrantAh.23:12
bdrungwgrant: and the cvs import of eclipse failed - failed to import root23:12
bdrungwgrant: and the hg import of audacious failed - maximum recursion depth exceeded23:16
bdrungsumma summarum 1 of 5 daily builds work23:17
wgrantlamont: Is king really a virt buildd now? I thought it was the amd64 LiveCD machine.23:32
daveisadorkrockstar: not yet, i had to run out for a bit but i can now23:49
daveisadorkummm what should i file against?23:52
thumperdaveisadork: we've done one already23:52
daveisadorkok, got a link?23:52
thumperbug 61707223:53
ubot5Launchpad bug 617072 in Launchpad Bazaar Integration "Maverick recipe builds fail (affected: 1, heat: 6)" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/61707223:53
daveisadorkthanks23:53
rockstarCoincidentally, the patch has already landed.23:56
daveisadorkha i just saw that *after* i commented23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!