=== yofel_ is now known as yofel [08:00] good morning [08:01] HAPPY HUG DAY! [08:01] salut jibel [08:02] comment ça va? [08:02] guten tag dholbach [08:02] :) [08:02] ca va et toi ? [08:02] un peu fatiguée mais ca va :) [08:03] fatigué [08:03] dholbach: how many languages do you know? :) [08:03] jibel: ca va bien, c'est 'UG DAY aujourd'hui :) [08:04] vish: not enough :) [08:04] morgen ^^ [08:04] vish: I'm sure you speak more than I do :) [08:04] without the 'e' is better for a man :) [08:04] Indians all speak more languages than anybody else [08:04] * vish parle un peu de francais ;) [08:04] jibel: yeah, it took me a bit to realise :) [08:06] dholbach: your merge on bug 586790 still being looked at? [08:06] Launchpad bug 586790 in software-properties (Ubuntu) "Typo in --help of apt-add-repository (affects: 2) (heat: 12)" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/586790 [08:07] yofel: I'll pester mvo [08:07] once he's up [08:07] ok [08:07] what a slacker! [08:07] more like, shouldn't that be merged into lp:software-properties not lp:ubuntu/software-properties ? [08:08] yofel: software-properties is probably a special case [08:09] I was demo'ing the general approach of getting something into Ubuntu [08:09] getting the fix upstream is a different story [08:09] but yeah, I agree [08:09] ah ok [08:13] * dholbach starts doing a bit of sponsoring, will join you for some patch review in a bit [08:56] "LP will go down for maintenace in 30 seconds." [08:56] :-( [09:02] argh! great day for lp maintainance! we have feature freeze as well today :( [09:02] yep, good timing [09:02] hey seb128 [09:02] hey dholbach [09:03] seb128: thanks for getting the gdm fix in [09:03] awesome [09:03] dholbach, yw [09:03] seb128: merci beaucoup mon vieux ami :-P [09:04] de rien mon jeune ami ! [09:05] haha [09:05] I'm older than you! [09:06] you call me old so ... ;-) [11:00] OK! The HUG DAY is back! :) [11:00] yoohoo! [12:30] how's the reviews coming on? [12:55] Packaging Training Session: Patch Review and Operation Cleansweep in #ubuntu-classroom in 5 minutes [13:24] see dholbach [13:25] haha pedro_ [13:25] pedro_: we just had a session in #ubuntu-classroom about the patch reviewers process [13:26] and will now work on a few examples together [13:26] I'm sure we'll have a bunch of questions for you in a bit :) [13:26] dholbach, cool! is the log available somewhere? [13:26] dholbach, so we can link it on the hug day page ;-) [13:27] pedro_: not yet, but I'll give you the link once the session is done and the log available [13:27] dholbach, ok, thanks! [13:28] reboot, brb [13:38] dholbach : are you choosing a bug? or are we finished?. "thanks for the questions" seems for me like we are finished, and I would like to see an example. [13:40] oh ok [13:40] I just did https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sabayon/+bug/595608 [13:40] Launchpad bug 595608 in sabayon (Ubuntu) "Sabayon-apply fails on mozilla_bookmarks (affects: 2) (heat: 12)" [Undecided,Fix released] [13:40] with a bit of investigation I found that it was fixed already [13:40] one I did before was https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/debian/+source/python-mysqldb/+bug/588859 [13:40] Launchpad bug 588859 in python-mysqldb (Debian) (and 2 other projects) "python-mysqldb silently drops exceptions on deadlocks (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Unknown,Unknown] [13:41] (the person had forwarded the patches to debian and upstream already [13:41] ) [13:41] so I added the upstream/debian bugs to the bug's tasks and added the tags [13:41] also if you check out https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam/ReviewGuide#Examples there's a couple more examples [13:42] I thought we'd now all go and try to work on bugs/patches individually and bring up questions as soon as we have them [14:00] which patches/bugs are you currently looking at? anyone ran into problems already? [14:02] I'd like to add that if you did an ubuntu-sponsors merge request, there is no need to subscribe them to the bug [14:02] devildante: hm? [14:02] (talking by experience :p) [14:02] ah yes [14:04] hm, we don't have an example for a merge request in the Examples. I did bug 601127 yesterday, but there I had to patch the patch [14:04] Launchpad bug 601127 in update-manager (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "don't hide treeview and notebook when some package is available but not installable (affects: 1) (heat: 12)" [Low,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/601127 [14:04] someone got a cleaner one? [14:05] pedro_: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Packaging/Training/Logs/2010-08-12 [14:05] yofel: if you find one, can you add it to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam/ReviewGuide#Examples ? [14:05] dholbach, thanks! linking it right now [14:06] sure [14:06] yeeeeeeehaw [14:06] awesome [14:06] I got a few of them off the list already [14:07] looking forward to see http://qa.ubuntu.com/reports/patches/ later on [14:09] glad to see you here devildante :) [14:12] kamusin: hi :) [14:13] hey devildante how are things today with the hugday? [14:13] kamusin: not very well, still busy with my addons branch [14:16] how are you guys getting on? [14:16] kamusin: but I think my work of yesterday is enough to compensate :p [14:17] heh === JMS is now known as JoeMaverickSett [14:33] how are we doing in terms of reviewing bugs/patches? :) [14:35] I should've made a note where we started today :) [14:36] pedro_: could it be that bugs.g.o is very slow? [14:39] pedro_: what is the bugzilla component for mobile-broadband-provider-info? [14:40] modem-manager found it [14:40] thanks [14:40] :) [14:41] dholbach, bugzilla is slow for you? it's working fine here [14:41] it's better now [14:42] pedro_: how can I add https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=626731 to https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/mobile-broadband-provider-info/+bug/447380 ? [14:42] Gnome bug 626731 in ModemManager "Support for Croatian Academic and Research NETwork" [Normal,Unconfirmed] [14:42] looking [14:45] i see, since the project is already registered in launchpad as upstream lp doesn't allows you to add the upstream link [14:45] * pedro_ kicks lp [14:46] oh ok [14:46] let me try something , one sec [14:49] dholbach, looks like the only solution is to reject that upstream tasks for mobile-broadband-provider-info, open one for NM and put the link there... [14:49] lp fault [14:53] yeah, whatever :) [14:54] would be great to have a link here to create those: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/447380/+watch/79578 [14:54] Launchpad bug 447380 in mobile-broadband-provider-info (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "Support for Croatian Academic and Research NETwork (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New] [14:54] "There are currently no links to this bug watch" I'd love to have a "create one" button there... [14:54] yeah [15:00] dholbach, where did you upload the logs of the session you just gave? [15:01] ara: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Packaging/Training/Logs/2010-08-12 [15:01] ara, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Packaging/Training/Logs/2010-08-12 [15:01] HA! QUICKER! :) [15:01] high five! [15:01] * dholbach hugs pedro_ [15:01] * pedro_ hugs dholbach back [15:02] pedro_: ¡COGE EL AVE! [15:02] lol! [15:02] it doesn't get old :) [15:02] :D [15:04] 1501! [15:22] 1499! [15:46] 1494! [15:59] 1492! [15:59] awesome [15:59] * dholbach hugs you all [16:18] guys, bug 600989 is for a bug that doesn't have an upstream bug tracker. should I seek Ubuntu sponsorship? [16:18] Launchpad bug 600989 in multimon (Ubuntu) "Wrong sox syntax in gen.c (output) (affects: 1) (heat: 90)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/600989 [16:21] for a package* [16:36] devildante: what to do for todays hug day. I hope to involve too .. [16:36] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/20100812 [16:36] follow this for each bug: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam/ReviewGuide#Workflow [16:38] yofel: devildante thanks, I see myself as a potential contributer here. :)) === simar__mohaar is now known as simar [17:20] how can we know progress of operation cleansweep? [17:24] devildante: there's a plot here https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/20100812 [17:25] thank you, elopio :) [18:58] Hi. I have a patch that is included in a release in debian unstable but not in testing (and not in maverick). I have added the tag patch-accepted-debian, but do I have to do anything more? I mean, the bug is still New, do I have to change to fix commited or something like that? [19:07] norax: which app? [19:10] nigelb: its pmccabe. In unstable is in 2.6 but we have 2.5 in maverick. [19:11] norax: you can request an ffe. [19:11] nigelb: Whats an ffe? [19:11] !ffe [19:11] Feature Freeze Exception. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess for the freeze exception process. [19:11] sorry about the jargon [19:12] No problem. Thanks. [19:12] oh, ugh, that might require a merge and not a sync though === BlackZ_ is now known as BlackZ [19:13] ok, just a sync would do! [19:20] It is a sync. But I do not know if it worths. It is not a critical package and if it is not in testing I assume that it is not testing enough [19:31] norax: its not in testing because I think debian is frozen now. [19:32] nigelb: Thanks. I think I am going to request an FFE. Let's see what happens [19:33] norax: And I just confirmed from maco that debian is indeed in freeze :) [19:34] nigelb: then should I ask an FFE also for debian? [19:35] Don't think so. [19:35] It was their final freeze I think. [20:17] I have request an FFE: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pmccabe/+bug/616977 but I do not know, maybe it is too much work (not just mine, but the ubuntu release team, and later the sponsor team) for something that will be automatically repaired in 11.04. [20:17] Launchpad bug 616977 in pmccabe (Ubuntu) "ask for an FFE syncing from debian unstable (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New] [20:45] Do I understand. Forward to debian-upstream is to run program: submittodebian ? [21:01] submittodebian sends an email from your account that creates a bug in their track system, so I think that you are right, debian-upstream is to run this program. [21:51] norax: It would be good if someone confirm this [22:14] nigelb: It seems that as the update is bug fix only, no FFe is required. [23:25] rsajdok: yes submittodebian would be the easiest way, esp. if you already packaged the patch to test it [23:28] about bug 613407 - it's adding a check to not make dkms fail if a config file doesn't exist, but the config file is actually installed by the dkms package so should never be missing unless deleted, does that even make sense to fix? [23:28] Launchpad bug 613407 in dkms (Ubuntu) "/etc/kernel/header_postinst.d/dkms exited with return code 2 (affects: 2) (dups: 1) (heat: 494)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/613407