=== magcius_ is now known as magcius [00:15] chrisccoulson: you can try asking about the branding/cache issue in #developers on moznet or ask gavin and see if he knows [00:18] micahg - yeah, i might do that tomorrow [00:59] are there any non-ff gecko browsers in the lucid repos? [01:00] sn9: seamonkey, conkeror [01:05] hmm, i just installed conkeror and moonlight-plugin-mozilla and i get: [01:05] $ conkeror [01:05] Attempting to load the system libmoon [01:05] Segmentation fault [01:05] libmoon = broke in lucid [01:06] is there a ppa? [01:06] * micahg will have to fix at some point [01:31] any besides seamonkey and conkeror? [01:32] sn9: I think we dropped the rest, oh there's fennec [01:34] that's a shame [01:34] sn9: well, we couldn't maintain them, also it won't fix your problem [01:35] my problem is that firefox does not unload plugins when you close a tab [01:35] it's an intolerable memory leak [01:35] sn9: well, we'll have a 4.0b3 PPA soon [01:36] should be a little better with the memory [01:36] a little? that's not all that encouraging [01:36] sn9: idk I haven't used it much yet [01:36] and there is a daily ppa, right? [01:37] sn9: yes, https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa [01:42] can the 4.0b4 build there coexist with 3.6.8? [01:43] sn9: yes [01:43] sn9: beta PPA will be the same way [01:43] can they run simultaneously, too? [01:43] sn9: yes [07:16] asac: how do I get a new tarball for enigmail? === yofel_ is now known as yofel === maxb_ is now known as maxb [09:45] asac, your (old) no_tree_sink_v8.patch diverged. is it still needed? [09:48] asac, you said "use -fno-tree-sink for gcc44 to workaround armel gcc inlining bug wrt -fno-strict-aliasing", but upstream fixed the strict aliasing in that file [10:24] fta: good question. upload to real archive without it and see what happens? [10:24] it's in the daily ppa, i dropped it already [10:24] but there's no armel there [10:24] right. but daily ppa doesnt build armel [10:25] lets just wait till next time you push to real archive [10:25] if that fails we can see whats going on [10:25] i assume that happens soon enough [10:30] asac, btw, in case you missed it, i tweaked the user-agent to expose both chromium and ubuntu/version, i hope that won't create regressions === fta_ is now known as fta [11:23] asac, chrisccoulson: i wonder what the feature freeze means for chromium, it will jump from 5 to 6 shortly [11:23] fta - i talked to micahg about this yesterday, because we just had to do a FFe for thunderbird (to go from 3.0 to 3.1) [11:24] and ? [11:24] i'll see if we can get a standing FFe [11:24] tbh, asking for a FFe is kinda pointless, as we need to migrate to the new version anyway === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta [13:06] chrisccoulson: how aobut shipping ffox 4 beta for release? ;) [13:06] j.k. :-P [13:06] asac - you wouldn't be the first person to suggest that ;) [13:06] yeah. though i remember the bashing i received for shipping a beta in hardy ;) [13:07] before release everyone loves you ... after release they all trash and bash you for all the bugs they see is your fault :- [13:07] P [13:07] heh :) [13:07] chrisccoulson: did you get a list of bugs you wanted to look at? [13:07] security bugs (tbird)? [13:07] asac - not yet, i'm going to do that today [13:08] http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/ [13:08] http://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/thunderbird30.html [13:08] thanks [13:09] bah [13:09] it's soon mid august so is there a more specific date than mid august for the beta ppa yet? [13:09] in the past they always mentioned "tbird is not really affected because it has no js support by default" ... seems they dont do that anymore [13:10] i think most of the bugs there are already open [13:10] if you find a bug lets talk about that [13:10] (a bug that isnt open) [13:11] yeah, i'll have a look through those [13:11] thanks [13:15] chrisccoulson, jdstrand: fyi, for the next chromium update, i will need to also update gyp and the codecs [13:16] fta - that applies for lucid also doesn't it? [13:16] chrisccoulson, yes [13:16] we get gyp from debian in maverick, not sure if we should block that [13:17] i think we should carry on getting that from debian for now if we can [13:22] they're stuck at 0.1~svn824-1, i need 837 min === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta [16:26] Dimmuxx: next week :) [16:27] asac: how do I make the enigmail tarball? [16:27] micahg: hmm. debian did that, didnt they? [16:27] fta: we can jump higher than Debian if needed, I think chrisccoulson was just suggesting syncing when possible [16:27] asac: to 1.1.2? [16:27] e.g. i think they asked me the same question and then i told them: please do that!! [16:27] and i got a complain, but then never heard back ;) [16:28] micahg: well. would be a win if they managed to upgrade to any new upstream snapshot ;) [16:28] lets see [16:28] asac: is the make-orig script yours? [16:28] packages.qa.debian.org/enigmail [16:28] ok seems they sticked to the same version i prepared [16:28] let me look ;) [16:29] I was going to use the enigmail upstream tarball then I saw that it's modified [16:29] or rather we use a modified one [16:29] micahg: yeah [16:29] that make-orig is mine i guess ;) [16:29] micahg: you have to combine the tarball with the buildsystem tar.gz [16:29] thats what make-orig does for you [16:29] asac: from xulrunner? [16:29] yeah [16:30] i think i used that last time [16:30] you can also keep the same that is currently in there if there are no problems [16:30] but maybe bumping the build system makes a bit sense [16:30] just to see how fragile this whole thing is (or hopefully not) [16:31] well, I would think enigmail 1.1.2 requires xul 1.9.2 build system [16:45] micahg: nice :) [16:45] Dimmuxx: it would not have been possible w/out all the work chrisccoulson has put into it [16:53] micahg: will you see what happens if you try to upgrade? [16:54] asac: well, I tried creating a new tarball andt the script didn't like me [16:54] i think the mammouth patch kind of landed upstream ... so we should drop it and see how that fails and then improve the patch [16:54] micahg: you need the enigmail tgz from upstream and a xulrunner buildsystem tgz [16:54] what happens? [16:54] asac: what's targetdir supposed to be? [16:55] not sure ... just specify some empty dir in /tmp/test [16:55] or something [16:55] ;) [16:55] guess thats where it puts the orig to [16:56] * micahg guesses renaming the upstream tarball isrequired [16:57] cant tell until i see how it fails ;) [16:57] i can try later today maybe ... but not sure ;) [16:58] http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/477498/ [16:59] asac: ^^ [17:03] micahg: did you create /tmp/test/ ? [17:03] I have to do everything? ;) [17:03] mkdir /tmp/test [17:03] i wouldnt be shocked if you have to ;) [17:03] :) seems to have worked [17:03] as i know me i wouldnt have dont it until i got annoyed by it ;) [17:04] feel free to improve and add a [ ! -d /tmp/test ] && mkdir /tmp/test [17:04] or something ;) [17:04] asac: k :) [17:05] asac: thanks, I hope I can finish this over the weekend then...after that it's only the upgrade dependency issue for TB/locales [17:05] so then i guess the mega patch doesnt apply. i upstreamed it, but patrick (the enigmail upstream) had to fix a few things so he could still build the "upstream" style [17:05] and now i dont know what happens [17:05] if it builds etc. [17:05] from what i know someone in debian complained about something, but i think i failed to follow up back then and now i dont know where we stand :-P [17:06] so would love to have 1.1.2 prepared and then just tell them that we upload to debian ;) [17:06] anyway. lets check that on weekend [17:06] or monday in case i fail to show up [17:09] asac: k, I'll try w/out the patch first and see what happens [17:09] right. [17:10] the patch is definitly upstreamed. just landing might have caused some regressions ;) [17:10] the rest of the patches apply :) [17:15] cool thing [17:15] what happens? [17:15] bang!! [17:17] trouble finding mozilla headers [17:20] chrisccoulson: nspr 4.8.5 minimum for next mozilla release, in source is 4.8.6 [17:22] micahg - is that for 1.9.2.9? [17:23] chrisccoulson: yes, that's why the dailies broke [17:23] i'll get those in to the PPA soon [17:24] micahg: paste problem please [17:24] (finding mozilla headers) [17:26] asac: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/477506/ [17:27] * asac sneaks out to buy some food etc. but will be back later as he still has a cold ;) [17:27] micahg: do you pass --with-system-nss etc.? [17:27] in debian/rules ? [17:28] no [17:28] i think that needs to be explicitly mentioned [17:28] k [17:28] i had a patch against xulrunner in whatever version i built it against before [17:28] maybe you guys dropped that? or didnt port to 1.9.2? [17:28] does the current package build at all still ;)? [17:28] asac: yes [17:28] anyway, debian uses with-system-nss and -nspr as they dont have the patch [17:28] so we can do that too [17:29] asac: I had to add -fshort-wchar to debian's to build though [17:29] micahg: oh that patch was against thunderbird [17:29] ;) [17:29] so that is only in 3.0 atm i think [17:29] micahg: that fshort-wchar should automatically happen on 64-bit iirc [17:30] anyway. upgrade ours and use --with-system in debian/rules [17:30] i hope thats enough [17:30] if you still need -fshort-wchar we need to check [17:30] something is wrong then ;) [17:30] or regressed [17:30] ok out for a bit [17:45] asac - i can't view mozilla bug 571106 ;) [17:45] chrisccoulson: Error: Error getting Mozilla bug #571106: NotPermitted [17:47] and 570451 [17:48] and 568148. those are the only ones i can't see ;) [18:12] damn, with the new themes, chromium is ugly [18:13] chrisccoulson: bgo email is? [18:13] bmo [18:13] asac - chrisccoulson@ubuntu.com [18:14] chrisccoulson: should work now [18:15] asac - thanks [18:53] Hi. A new way Firefox handles tab close button is so anoying... Can you make so There are always visible, and not only when you click on that tab? :D [19:10] hallo all, do any one can confirm problems on video playback in fullscrean in firefox-4 [19:10] ? [19:10] here is my example http://videobin.org/+1kz/1u6.html [19:10] fishor: IIRC it was known and you asked yesterday [19:11] gnomefreak: yea i asked, but i didn't get an answer [19:11] fishor: it is known [19:12] gnomefreak: thank you, any progress on it? is it reported upstream? [19:12] Milos_SD: i dont have it open atm but try adding the center section back (under addressbar) [19:12] fishor: i dont know [19:12] gnomefreak: so it is know only here? [19:13] fishor: again i dont know. i have to guess and say it is known upstream since it is their bug not ours [19:13] gnomefreak, you mean bookmark bar? [19:13] Milos_SD: yeah sounds good [19:14] I have that :) [19:14] so the problem is not there [19:15] please file a bug [19:15] unless someone here sees this but atm i have alot of shit going on [19:16] gnomefreak, I can see close buttons on tabs when I enter that new tab view, and go back... but if I close one of that tabs, it is back to hiden :) [19:17] well i dont it is our bug but more of an upstream bug. Please file a bug with us and we will decide if it is ours or upstreams [19:20] * gnomefreak gone while testing === fta_ is now known as fta [19:44] I bumped xulrunner 191 and 192 .head nspr so it builds, I'll bump for FF later [19:44] chrisccoulson: did we replace Firefox 3.5 in jaunty? === fta_ is now known as fta === rickspencer3 is now known as saacfl === saacfl is now known as rickspencer3 === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta [23:20] Hey, thanks for getting thunderbird-3.1 working! [23:22] I've added ppa:ubuntu-mozilla-daily/ppa in KPackageKit in Kubuntu Lucid. Should I install thunderbird-3.1-gnome-support as well?