[00:15] <micahg> chrisccoulson: you can try asking about the branding/cache issue in #developers on moznet or ask gavin and see if he knows
[00:18] <chrisccoulson> micahg - yeah, i might do that tomorrow
[00:59] <sn9> are there any non-ff gecko browsers in the lucid repos?
[01:00] <micahg> sn9: seamonkey, conkeror
[01:05] <sn9> hmm, i just installed conkeror and moonlight-plugin-mozilla and i get:
[01:05] <sn9> $ conkeror
[01:05] <sn9> Attempting to load the system libmoon
[01:05] <sn9> Segmentation fault
[01:05] <micahg> libmoon = broke in lucid
[01:06] <sn9> is there a ppa?
[01:06]  * micahg will have to fix at some point
[01:31] <sn9> any besides seamonkey and conkeror?
[01:32] <micahg> sn9: I think we dropped the rest, oh there's fennec
[01:34] <sn9> that's a shame
[01:34] <micahg> sn9: well, we couldn't maintain them, also it won't fix your problem
[01:35] <sn9> my problem is that firefox does not unload plugins when you close a tab
[01:35] <sn9> it's an intolerable memory leak
[01:35] <micahg> sn9: well, we'll have a 4.0b3 PPA soon
[01:36] <micahg> should be a little better with the memory
[01:36] <sn9> a little? that's not all that encouraging
[01:36] <micahg> sn9: idk I haven't used it much yet
[01:36] <sn9> and there is a daily ppa, right?
[01:37] <micahg> sn9: yes, https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa
[01:42] <sn9> can the 4.0b4 build there coexist with 3.6.8?
[01:43] <micahg> sn9: yes
[01:43] <micahg> sn9: beta PPA will be the same way
[01:43] <sn9> can they run simultaneously, too?
[01:43] <micahg> sn9: yes
[07:16] <micahg> asac: how do I get a new tarball for enigmail?
[09:45] <fta> asac, your (old) no_tree_sink_v8.patch diverged. is it still needed?
[09:48] <fta> asac, you said "use -fno-tree-sink for gcc44 to workaround armel gcc inlining bug wrt -fno-strict-aliasing", but upstream fixed the strict aliasing in that file
[10:24] <asac> fta: good question. upload to real archive without it and see what happens?
[10:24] <fta> it's in the daily ppa, i dropped it already
[10:24] <fta> but there's no armel there
[10:24] <asac> right. but daily ppa doesnt build armel
[10:25] <asac> lets just wait till next time you push to real archive
[10:25] <asac> if that fails we can see whats going on
[10:25] <asac> i assume that happens soon enough
[10:30] <fta> asac, btw, in case you missed it, i tweaked the user-agent to expose both chromium and ubuntu/version, i hope that won't create regressions
[11:23] <fta> asac, chrisccoulson: i wonder what the feature freeze means for chromium, it will jump from 5 to 6 shortly
[11:23] <chrisccoulson> fta - i talked to micahg about this yesterday, because we just had to do a FFe for thunderbird (to go from 3.0 to 3.1)
[11:24] <fta> and ?
[11:24] <chrisccoulson> i'll see if we can get a standing FFe
[11:24] <chrisccoulson> tbh, asking for a FFe is kinda pointless, as we need to migrate to the new version anyway
[13:06] <asac> chrisccoulson: how aobut shipping ffox 4 beta for release? ;)
[13:06] <asac> j.k. :-P
[13:06] <chrisccoulson> asac - you wouldn't be the first person to suggest that ;)
[13:06] <asac> yeah. though i remember the bashing i received for shipping a beta in hardy ;)
[13:07] <asac> before release everyone loves you ... after release they all trash and bash you for all the bugs they see is your fault :-
[13:07] <asac> P
[13:07] <chrisccoulson> heh :)
[13:07] <asac> chrisccoulson: did you get a list of bugs you wanted to look at?
[13:07] <asac> security bugs (tbird)?
[13:07] <chrisccoulson> asac - not yet, i'm going to do that today
[13:08] <asac> http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/
[13:08] <asac> http://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/thunderbird30.html
[13:08] <chrisccoulson> thanks
[13:09] <asac> bah
[13:09] <Dimmuxx> it's soon mid august so is there a more specific date than mid august for the beta ppa yet?
[13:09] <asac> in the past they always mentioned "tbird is not really affected because it has no js support by default" ... seems they dont do that anymore
[13:10] <asac> i think most of the bugs there are already open
[13:10] <asac> if you find a bug lets talk about that
[13:10] <asac> (a bug that isnt open)
[13:11] <chrisccoulson> yeah, i'll have a look through those
[13:11] <chrisccoulson> thanks
[13:15] <fta> chrisccoulson, jdstrand: fyi, for the next chromium update, i will need to also update gyp and the codecs
[13:16] <chrisccoulson> fta - that applies for lucid also doesn't it?
[13:16] <fta> chrisccoulson, yes
[13:16] <fta> we get gyp from debian in maverick, not sure if we should block that
[13:17] <chrisccoulson> i think we should carry on getting that from debian for now if we can
[13:22] <fta> they're stuck at 0.1~svn824-1, i need 837 min
[16:26] <micahg> Dimmuxx: next week :)
[16:27] <micahg> asac: how do I make the enigmail tarball?
[16:27] <asac> micahg: hmm. debian did that, didnt they?
[16:27] <micahg> fta: we can jump higher than Debian if needed, I think chrisccoulson was just suggesting syncing when possible
[16:27] <micahg> asac: to 1.1.2?
[16:27] <asac> e.g. i think they asked me the same question and then i told them: please do that!!
[16:27] <asac> and i got a complain, but then never heard back ;)
[16:28] <asac> micahg: well. would be a win if they managed to upgrade to any new upstream snapshot ;)
[16:28] <asac> lets see
[16:28] <micahg> asac: is the make-orig script yours?
[16:28] <asac> packages.qa.debian.org/enigmail
[16:28] <asac> ok seems they sticked to the same version i prepared
[16:28] <asac> let me look ;)
[16:29] <micahg> I was going to use the enigmail upstream tarball then I saw that it's modified
[16:29] <micahg> or rather we use a modified one
[16:29] <asac> micahg: yeah
[16:29] <asac> that make-orig is mine i guess ;)
[16:29] <asac> micahg: you have to combine the tarball with the buildsystem tar.gz
[16:29] <asac> thats what make-orig does for you
[16:29] <micahg> asac: from xulrunner?
[16:29] <asac> yeah
[16:30] <asac> i think i used that last time
[16:30] <asac> you can also keep the same that is currently in there if there are no problems
[16:30] <asac> but maybe bumping the build system makes a bit sense
[16:30] <asac> just to see how fragile this whole thing is (or hopefully not)
[16:31] <micahg> well, I would think enigmail 1.1.2  requires xul 1.9.2 build system
[16:45] <Dimmuxx> micahg: nice :)
[16:45] <micahg> Dimmuxx: it would not have been possible w/out all the work chrisccoulson has put into it
[16:53] <asac> micahg: will you see what happens if you try to upgrade?
[16:54] <micahg> asac: well, I tried creating a new tarball andt the script didn't like me
[16:54] <asac> i think the mammouth patch kind of landed upstream ... so we should drop it and see how that fails and then improve the patch
[16:54] <asac> micahg: you need the enigmail tgz from upstream and a xulrunner buildsystem tgz
[16:54] <asac> what happens?
[16:54] <micahg> asac: what's targetdir supposed to be?
[16:55] <asac> not sure ... just specify some empty dir in /tmp/test
[16:55] <asac> or something
[16:55] <asac> ;)
[16:55] <asac> guess thats where it puts the orig to
[16:56]  * micahg guesses renaming the upstream tarball isrequired
[16:57] <asac> cant tell until i see how it fails ;)
[16:57] <asac> i can try later today maybe ... but not sure ;)
[16:58] <micahg> http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/477498/
[16:59] <micahg> asac: ^^
[17:03] <asac> micahg: did you create /tmp/test/ ?
[17:03] <micahg> I have to do everything? ;)
[17:03] <asac> mkdir /tmp/test
[17:03] <asac> i wouldnt be shocked if you have to ;)
[17:03] <micahg> :) seems to have worked
[17:03] <asac> as i know me i wouldnt have dont it until i got annoyed by it ;)
[17:04] <asac> feel free to improve and add a [ ! -d /tmp/test ] && mkdir /tmp/test
[17:04] <asac> or something ;)
[17:04] <micahg> asac: k :)
[17:05] <micahg> asac: thanks, I hope I can finish this over the weekend then...after that it's only the upgrade dependency issue for TB/locales
[17:05] <asac> so then i guess the mega patch doesnt apply. i upstreamed it, but patrick (the enigmail upstream) had to fix a few things so he could still build the "upstream" style
[17:05] <asac> and now i dont know what happens
[17:05] <asac> if it builds etc.
[17:05] <asac> from what i know someone in debian complained about something, but i think i failed to follow up back then and now i dont know where we stand :-P
[17:06] <asac> so would love to have 1.1.2 prepared and then just tell them that we upload to debian ;)
[17:06] <asac> anyway. lets check that on weekend
[17:06] <asac> or monday in case i fail to show up
[17:09] <micahg> asac: k, I'll try w/out the patch first and see what happens
[17:09] <asac> right.
[17:10] <asac> the patch is definitly upstreamed. just landing might have caused some regressions ;)
[17:10] <micahg> the rest of the patches apply :)
[17:15] <asac> cool thing
[17:15] <asac> what happens?
[17:15] <asac> bang!!
[17:17] <micahg> trouble finding mozilla headers
[17:20] <micahg> chrisccoulson: nspr 4.8.5 minimum for next mozilla release, in source is 4.8.6
[17:22] <chrisccoulson> micahg - is that for 1.9.2.9?
[17:23] <micahg> chrisccoulson: yes, that's why the dailies broke
[17:23] <chrisccoulson> i'll get those in to the PPA soon
[17:24] <asac> micahg: paste problem please
[17:24] <asac> (finding mozilla headers)
[17:26] <micahg> asac: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/477506/
[17:27]  * asac sneaks out to buy some food etc. but will be back later as he still has a cold ;)
[17:27] <asac> micahg: do you pass --with-system-nss etc.?
[17:27] <asac> in debian/rules ?
[17:28] <micahg> no
[17:28] <asac> i think that needs to be explicitly mentioned
[17:28] <micahg> k
[17:28] <asac> i had a patch against xulrunner in whatever version i built it against before
[17:28] <asac> maybe you guys dropped that? or didnt port to 1.9.2?
[17:28] <asac> does the current package build at all still ;)?
[17:28] <micahg> asac: yes
[17:28] <asac> anyway, debian uses with-system-nss and -nspr as they dont have the patch
[17:28] <asac> so we can do that too
[17:29] <micahg> asac: I had to add -fshort-wchar to debian's to build though
[17:29] <asac> micahg: oh that patch was against thunderbird
[17:29] <asac> ;)
[17:29] <asac> so that is only in 3.0 atm i think
[17:29] <asac> micahg: that fshort-wchar should automatically happen on 64-bit iirc
[17:30] <asac> anyway. upgrade ours and use --with-system in debian/rules
[17:30] <asac> i hope thats enough
[17:30] <asac> if you still need -fshort-wchar we need to check
[17:30] <asac> something is wrong then ;)
[17:30] <asac> or regressed
[17:30] <asac> ok out for a bit
[17:45] <chrisccoulson> asac - i can't view mozilla bug 571106 ;)
[17:45] <ubot2> chrisccoulson: Error: Error getting Mozilla bug #571106: NotPermitted
[17:47] <chrisccoulson> and 570451
[17:48] <chrisccoulson> and 568148. those are the only ones i can't see ;)
[18:12] <fta> damn, with the new themes, chromium is ugly
[18:13] <asac> chrisccoulson: bgo email is?
[18:13] <asac> bmo
[18:13] <chrisccoulson> asac - chrisccoulson@ubuntu.com
[18:14] <asac> chrisccoulson: should work now
[18:15] <chrisccoulson> asac - thanks
[18:53] <Milos_SD> Hi. A new way Firefox handles tab close button is so anoying... Can you make so There are always visible, and not only when you click on that tab? :D
[19:10] <fishor> hallo all, do any one can confirm  problems on video playback in fullscrean in firefox-4
[19:10] <fishor> ?
[19:10] <fishor> here is my example http://videobin.org/+1kz/1u6.html
[19:10] <gnomefreak> fishor: IIRC it was known and you asked yesterday
[19:11] <fishor> gnomefreak: yea i asked, but i didn't get an answer
[19:11] <gnomefreak> fishor: it is known
[19:12] <fishor> gnomefreak: thank you, any progress on it? is it reported upstream?
[19:12] <gnomefreak> Milos_SD: i dont have it open atm but try adding the center section back (under addressbar)
[19:12] <gnomefreak> fishor: i dont know
[19:12] <fishor> gnomefreak: so it is know only here?
[19:13] <gnomefreak> fishor: again i dont know. i have to guess and say it is known upstream since it is their bug not ours
[19:13] <Milos_SD> gnomefreak, you mean bookmark bar?
[19:13] <gnomefreak> Milos_SD: yeah sounds good
[19:14] <Milos_SD> I have that :)
[19:14] <Milos_SD> so the problem is not there
[19:15] <gnomefreak> please file a bug
[19:15] <gnomefreak> unless someone here sees this but atm i have alot of shit going on
[19:16] <Milos_SD> gnomefreak, I can see close buttons on tabs when I enter that new tab view, and go back... but if I close one of that tabs, it is back to hiden :)
[19:17] <gnomefreak> well i dont it is our bug but more of an upstream bug. Please file a bug with us and we will decide if it is ours or upstreams
[19:20]  * gnomefreak gone while testing
[19:44] <micahg> I bumped xulrunner 191 and 192 .head nspr so it builds, I'll bump for FF later
[19:44] <micahg> chrisccoulson: did we replace Firefox 3.5 in jaunty?
[23:20] <skierpage> Hey, thanks for getting thunderbird-3.1 working!
[23:22] <skierpage> I've added ppa:ubuntu-mozilla-daily/ppa in KPackageKit in Kubuntu Lucid.  Should I install  thunderbird-3.1-gnome-support as well?