| * robbiew closes his eyes and holds on | 00:05 | |
| slangasek | hmm, something changed post-release to cause lilo-installer to fall out of the alternate ISO | 00:08 |
|---|---|---|
| slangasek | er, no - cause it to be /added/ to | 00:09 |
| slangasek | ... nope, I was right the first time | 00:09 |
| slangasek | ah, cjwatson made that change, alrighty then :) | 00:18 |
| slangasek | dropping langpacks from the daily-live ISO for .1; the package growth since 10.04 has all been in either the kernel or in firefox/xulrunner, both of which are infeasible to recover size from in the time remaining :( | 00:42 |
| === maxb_ is now known as maxb | ||
| Laney | are we having freeze exception delegates as per previous cycles? | 09:11 |
| ara | do you guys know when are we going to see the first 10.04.1 candidate images in the ISO tracker? | 09:56 |
| Riddell | ara: so far our release manager hasn't appeared so I wouldn't hold your breath | 12:13 |
| mathiaz | slangasek: hey - in which order are you planning to spin the 10.04.1 isos? | 17:59 |
| doko | barry: as I understand it, py27 was delayed by the release team (but ScottK might know more) | 18:01 |
| * ScottK looks at robbiew. | 18:02 | |
| * ScottK just mentioned it needed deciding since it wasn't done before FF. | 18:02 | |
| * robbiew thinks we need to postpone it | 18:02 | |
| robbiew | as it's not done | 18:03 |
| robbiew | and FF is here | 18:03 |
| * barry is sad | 18:03 | |
| barry | right, we talked about it before i went on vacation that the remaining handful of ftbfs could be fixed before beta | 18:04 |
| barry | (in main) | 18:04 |
| barry | and that i was committed to working on those and the universe failures | 18:05 |
| doko | sorry, I didn't track this too close this week | 18:05 |
| robbiew | barry: there was some concern from seb128 about the work it would take | 18:06 |
| robbiew | also on the rebuilds it would cause | 18:07 |
| barry | it would probably be ~500 packages in main+uni | 18:08 |
| barry | iirc | 18:08 |
| doko | robbiew: we'll have an arm rebuild of some packages anyway at some point | 18:08 |
| robbiew | so what do we lose by doing it early in 11.04 | 18:09 |
| barry | robbiew: probably not much practically speaking. i wonder though if it's possible/feasible to make the python2.7 package available even if not supported (i.e. no changes to python-support, python-central, python-defaults). does that give us much? | 18:10 |
| robbiew | doko? ScottK? ^ | 18:10 |
| barry | i do know that folks would like py27 in maverick, but i suppose waiting 6months won't kill them ;) | 18:10 |
| doko | robbiew, barry: that I did last Sunday. it's in main (at least I pushed it there) | 18:11 |
| ScottK | python2.7 is in Maverick. It's just not supported for modules and extensions. | 18:11 |
| barry | doko: cool | 18:11 |
| ScottK | No issue with that. | 18:11 |
| ScottK | Although it can drop to Universe if it won't be supported. | 18:11 |
| doko | what we should do is to explicitely add support in distribute, python-profiler and python-std-lib-extension | 18:12 |
| slangasek | mathiaz: in a very fast order, why? :) | 18:12 |
| ScottK | Then it would need to be in Main, but that shouldn't be a problem. | 18:12 |
| barry | doko: what do we need to add there? | 18:12 |
| doko | support for 2.7 | 18:12 |
| doko | basically update the mav packages from my ppa | 18:13 |
| barry | doko: is that just merging in your changes, or more work? if the latter, how can i help given that i can't upload them? | 18:14 |
| doko | barry: let me look at it tomorrow, before I say something wrong | 18:15 |
| barry | doko: okay :). i'm happy to do any and all grunt work to make this happen. if we can get those changes in then at least people can more easily start w/2.7 and i can adjust my ppas to work out the remaining build failures. i'll contact the appropriate mailing lists and give a status + solicit help and will work with upstreams to get fixes in, and updates in debian. then early in 11.04 we can flip the switch. that'll give us the rest | 18:17 |
| barry | of this cycle and all next cycle to make this a very solid offering | 18:17 |
| robbiew | thanks barry :) | 18:17 |
| robbiew | I'm sure ScottK is just a little bit happier inside now, too | 18:18 |
| robbiew | lol | 18:18 |
| ScottK | Now barry will have lots of free time to fix other stuff. | 18:18 |
| barry | robbiew: np! | 18:19 |
| barry | ScottK: this is how you repay me for making you happy? :) | 18:19 |
| ScottK | barry: Sure. Plenty to do and you claim you're looking for more experience. | 18:20 |
| barry | ScottK: thank you sir, can i have another? :) | 18:21 |
| robbiew | lol | 18:21 |
| * barry is glad someone gets the reference | 18:22 | |
| mathiaz | slangasek: I'm working on the test plan for the -server isos | 18:24 |
| mathiaz | slangasek: Having an idea about when the -server isos would be available would help | 18:24 |
| barry | doko, ScottK, robbiew thanks | 18:25 |
| robbiew | barry: no...thank you ;) | 18:26 |
| slangasek | mathiaz: ETA 20 minutes | 18:35 |
| mathiaz | slangasek: \o/ | 18:36 |
| mathiaz | slangasek: this is awesome! | 18:36 |
| bdrung | which archive admin rejected python-box2d and why? | 20:04 |
| Daviey | bdrung, Looks like it's still in the new queue to me. | 20:15 |
| bdrung | Daviey: i got two mail: "python-box2d_2.0.2+svn20100109.244-1_source.changes rejected" and "sugar-physics-activity_5+dfsg-1_source.changes rejected" | 20:16 |
| Daviey | bdrung, Interesting.. The source package was rejected, but binary i386 and sparc are still in NEW. | 20:19 |
| bdrung | Daviey: why can a binary be build if the source isn't accepted? | 20:20 |
| Daviey | That is a very good point.. I an intrigued as you are! | 20:20 |
| ScottK | bdrung: If it got uploaded more than once, it would likely get accepted once and rejected once. | 21:56 |
| bdrung | ScottK: ok, then the question is: how does it get uploaded twice? | 21:56 |
| ScottK | It's not rare for someone to upload a new package, realize it has a mistake, and then upload it again. | 21:57 |
| ScottK | Or two sponsors collide and they both upload it. | 21:57 |
| ScottK | I've seen both happen. | 21:57 |
| bdrung | ScottK: but i uploaded them days ago | 21:57 |
| bdrung | ok, it was only a half day ago. | 21:59 |
| bdrung | ScottK: shouldn't it get rejected immediately? | 21:59 |
| ScottK | Not if it's still in New. | 21:59 |
| bdrung | instead of getting a New message. | 22:00 |
| bdrung | so they are in New, chapter closed | 22:01 |
| ScottK | It might not make sense, but that's how it works at the moment. | 22:01 |
| bdrung | the reject message should be more verbose | 22:03 |
| * bdrung has to do some network analysis. bbl | 22:04 | |
| wgrant | ScottK, bdrung: bug #62976 | 23:43 |
| ubot4` | Launchpad bug 62976 in soyuz "Soyuz should not allow duplicated packages in NEW/UNAPPROVED queue" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/62976 | 23:43 |
| bdrung | wow, that's a low bug number | 23:45 |
| bdrung | wgrant: thanks for this link | 23:45 |
| wgrant | We only have one two-digit bug left in LP :( | 23:46 |
| bdrung | wgrant: which one? | 23:46 |
| wgrant | bug #25 | 23:48 |
| ubot4` | Launchpad bug 25 in rosetta "Allow discussion/commenting on translations (affects: 12) (dups: 3) (heat: 82)" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/25 | 23:48 |
| slangasek | ubuntu desktop, alternate posted for 10.04.1 | 23:51 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!