| * lfaraone waves | 02:30 | |
| === bernie is now known as bernie_afk | ||
| manusheel | dfarning: Good morning. | 15:46 |
|---|---|---|
| dfarning | manusheel, good morning | 15:50 |
| manusheel | dfarning: Thanks for the message for the workflow on patch creation and submission. | 15:51 |
| dfarning | manusheel, i was hoping to here back from luke about if it was resonable.... then I would fill it in in more detail | 15:53 |
| manusheel | dfarning: Sure. I think we also need to take care off non-traditional packages in .bzr. | 15:54 |
| * dipankar says hello to all. Sorry for being late | 15:55 | |
| === bernie_afk is now known as bernie | ||
| manusheel | dipankar: Hi Dipankar. | 15:58 |
| dipankar | dfarning, hello. How are you today? | 15:59 |
| manusheel | dipankar: Let us focus on the full screen view issues today as discussed. | 16:00 |
| dipankar | manusheel, yes sure sir | 16:00 |
| dipankar | manusheel, last night I tried searching a lot | 16:01 |
| dipankar | manusheel, sir, but I was unable to find any relevant information | 16:01 |
| dipankar | everywhere the flags were discussed | 16:01 |
| dipankar | the flag which will be useful to us is '-f', that we are already using | 16:02 |
| manusheel | dipankar: ok. | 16:02 |
| manusheel | dipankar: Let us post this question at usr today. | 16:03 |
| manusheel | See if we can get a response. | 16:03 |
| manusheel | dipankar: Did you get a chance to discuss this with Aleksey Lim? | 16:04 |
| dipankar | manusheel, no sir | 16:04 |
| dipankar | can I ask now? | 16:04 |
| manusheel | dipankar: yes. | 16:05 |
| dipankar | alsroot, around? | 16:05 |
| dipankar | alsroot, need your views and help regarding this bug : https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sugar-0.88/+bug/614388 | 16:06 |
| * alsroot looks | 16:06 | |
| alsroot | dipankar: there is some kind of logic to use not-full screen mode if screen is sufficiently large and fallback to "-f" mode, /me looks to code | 16:14 |
| dipankar | ok | 16:16 |
| alsroot | dipankar: yeah, current code assumes that if screen is less then 800x600, full screen mode is activated -- for myself, I'm not sure what the best option is, use "-f" all time, current code, or rely only on command line arguments | 16:19 |
| dipankar | alsroot, ok | 16:23 |
| dipankar | alsroot, so what do you suggest? | 16:29 |
| dipankar | alsroot, can we add a button in window mode to switch to 'maximized' mode? | 16:31 |
| alsroot | dipankar: dunno, it shouldn't be trivial, since we have to set fullscreen mode for Xephyr itself | 16:32 |
| satellit___ | can you install an icon on Desktop with sugar-emulator -f and label sugar fill screen. then Menu item is not full screen but have option with icon on desktop for full screen? | 16:32 |
| satellit___ | s/full screen | 16:34 |
| dipankar | satellit__, thats what I was thinking too | 16:37 |
| dipankar | alsroot, I didn't get onw thing | 16:38 |
| dipankar | *one | 16:38 |
| lfaraone | dfarning: mail sent to d-o-d@l.a.d.o | 16:38 |
| alsroot | dipankar: myself, too :) | 16:38 |
| dipankar | alsroot, xephyr's fullscreen is not maximized mode | 16:38 |
| dfarning | lfaraone, thanks | 16:38 |
| dipankar | alsroot, can you help me in understanding the code please? | 16:40 |
| dipankar | alsroot, where to start with looking inside the code | 16:40 |
| alsroot | dfarning: btw, the original #614388 issue is that there is a mess, if I recall right, in one code 72 scalling is assumed, in another 100 -- there is a patch http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/1747 wich set 72 by default | 16:41 |
| alsroot | dipankar: start w/ sugar/src/jarabe/util/emulator.py | 16:42 |
| * dipankar is looking into emulator.py | 16:44 | |
| dfarning | alsroot, ^^ in which tracker. | 16:47 |
| dipankar | alsroot, ohk | 16:47 |
| dipankar | alsroot, Its as desired | 16:48 |
| alsroot | dfarning: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sugar-0.88/+bug/614388 | 16:48 |
| dfarning | alsroot, yes weird stuff happen because of inconsistant scaling. | 16:50 |
| manusheel | alsroot: Thanks for the pointers. | 16:50 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, regarding flipsticks-activity, is it out of tasks now? | 16:50 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: it's there, but halted. | 16:51 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, ohk. I thought it was dropped due to some reasons. | 16:51 |
| lfaraone | alsroot: so polyol is a collection of libs? | 16:52 |
| * lfaraone is looking at http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Activity_Team/Polyol | 16:53 | |
| alsroot | lfaraone: it is sugar-toolkit rewritten in Vala (to support not only python activities) | 16:53 |
| alsroot | + some additional stuff in gui module | 16:53 |
| lfaraone | alsroot: okay. is it ready to be packaged? :) | 16:54 |
| dipankar | I hope yes! | 16:54 |
| alsroot | lfaraone: not yet, I'm busy w/ refinery stuff, planing to get refinery.sl.o working (i.e. 1st stage of 0sugar impl), and will return to polyol to release it | 16:56 |
| alsroot | and libjournal as well | 16:57 |
| lfaraone | alsroot: fair enough, thanks. | 16:57 |
| dipankar | dfarning, around? | 17:02 |
| manusheel | ishan: Please go through Sugar Control panel test cases at http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Test_cases_8.2.0#Sugar_Control_Panel | 17:34 |
| ishan | manusheel sir okay | 17:35 |
| manusheel | ishan: Info. on sugar control panel can be found at http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Sugar_Control_Panel | 17:35 |
| manusheel | mukul: I would like you to go through the above 2 links too ^^ | 17:35 |
| mukul | manusheel sir: Ok | 17:36 |
| manusheel | mukul: Send you the TA meeting logs too. | 17:36 |
| mukul | manusheel sir: Ok | 17:37 |
| mukul | manusheel sir:read the logs | 17:55 |
| manusheel | mukul: neat. | 18:04 |
| manusheel | mukul: What did you gather? | 18:04 |
| mukul | manusheel sir: What I actually packaged was renamed as Turtle Blocks | 18:05 |
| manusheel | Ok. | 18:06 |
| mukul | while Turtle Art is actually turtle art mini | 18:06 |
| manusheel | mukul: Kindly update the package and rename it as Turtle Blocks. | 18:07 |
| manusheel | mukul: Ok, we'll need to package Turtle Art Mini too. We'll do that in the coming week. | 18:07 |
| mukul | They are also planning to get a newer 94 version which some changes.I guess James will be looking into that | 18:08 |
| manusheel | mukul: Sure. We don't need to bother about that at this juncture. We don't have a timeline on that part yet. | 18:09 |
| mukul | manusheel sir: It has been mentioned by Walter Bender that he doesn't expect Turtle Art to be used | 18:09 |
| mukul | manusheel, by turtle art i mean turtle art mini | 18:09 |
| manusheel | mukul: I am not sure on that part. That is why, I'll check and get back to you during the coming week. | 18:10 |
| manusheel | mukul: Kindly update the Turtle Blocks package today. | 18:13 |
| mukul | manusheel sir: The source of Turtle Art-93.tar.bz2 file in itself remains to be renamed as turtle art while all that which is diplayed on Sugar after installation is renamed as Turtle Blocks | 18:13 |
| mukul | manusheel sir: I will surely do that | 18:13 |
| manusheel | mukul: Great. | 18:13 |
| mukul | manusheel sir: I suppose I just have to create a new repository which is to be named as sugar-turtleblocks-activity and push my package in it.Will make the necessary changes todday | 18:14 |
| manusheel | ankur: Hi Ankur. | 18:36 |
| ankur | hisir | 18:36 |
| dipankar | bernie, around? | 18:38 |
| * dipankar needs help in 'detecting network interfaces available through Network Manager' | 18:40 | |
| manusheel | dipankar: This is lunch time. Bernie might not be around. | 18:41 |
| dipankar | oh no | 18:42 |
| dipankar | ! | 18:42 |
| manusheel | dipankar: Kindly send an e-mail at USR mailing list. Will ask Bernie to have a look at it. | 18:42 |
| * dipankar good night all :) | 19:01 | |
| manusheel | ankur: Hi Ankur | 19:02 |
| manusheel | mukul: Hi Mukul | 19:02 |
| mukul | manusheel sir: Hi | 19:02 |
| mukul | manusheel sir: Version 94 of Turtle blocks was updated yesterday as I can see. | 19:03 |
| manusheel | mukul: Ok. | 19:03 |
| mukul | I will be packaging it | 19:03 |
| manusheel | mukul: Need any help on that front. | 19:03 |
| ankur | neeraj: around? | 19:03 |
| ankur | hi manu sir | 19:03 |
| manusheel | ankur: Any help required on the development front? | 19:04 |
| mukul | manusheel sir: I don't think it has to be any different from what I had done earlier. If there are any technicalities which I am missing, please point it out | 19:04 |
| ankur | yes, in maintainer feild of the package for which i am creating patch , maintainer team will be Ubuntu Sugarteam ? | 19:05 |
| bernie | manusheel: I'm around... but I'm having lunch next to the kbd because I'm overwhelmed by work :) | 19:05 |
| manusheel | bernie: Sure. You need to celebrate this weekend. | 19:06 |
| ankur | Ubuntu SugarTeam <ubuntu-sugarteam@lists.ubuntu.com> more specifically? | 19:06 |
| manusheel | bernie: Will send you an e-mail. | 19:06 |
| manusheel | mukul: I think the steps are the same. | 19:06 |
| manusheel | mukul: Kindly check with Neeraj if there is any difference. | 19:06 |
| manusheel | ankur: No, ankur@seeta.in | 19:07 |
| mukul | manusheel sir: thanks, I will check if I can manage on my own | 19:07 |
| mukul | manusheel sir: Okay | 19:07 |
| ankur | no no ,sir, see point 4 in this that is why i got confused : https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Howtos/Debdiff | 19:07 |
| bernie | manusheel: I will celebrate on monday night, after the RC images are released :-) | 19:07 |
| manusheel | ankur: Yes, please use Ubuntu SugarTeam <ubuntu-sugarteam@lists.ubuntu.com> | 19:07 |
| manusheel | ankur: right. | 19:07 |
| ankur | okay sir | 19:07 |
| manusheel | mukul: Great. Glad to hear. | 19:08 |
| neeraj | ankur, yes | 19:08 |
| manusheel | bernie: Neat. You should. Great work on Sugar. keep it up. | 19:08 |
| ankur | sir was in process of completing the patch. will send it in some time | 19:09 |
| ankur | i will get it checked first | 19:09 |
| manusheel | ankur: Sure. | 19:09 |
| manusheel | That would be great. | 19:10 |
| bernie | manusheel: :) | 19:14 |
| ankur | manusheel: the package i downloaded from debcheckout was toolkit-.90 | 19:47 |
| ankur | what did i needed to patch? | 19:47 |
| manusheel | ankur: Your source changes. | 19:48 |
| manusheel | ankur: Send you an e-mail. | 19:48 |
| manusheel | From David. | 19:48 |
| manusheel | Please check. | 19:48 |
| ankur | manusheel: sir which mail u are refering to? | 19:49 |
| manusheel | ankur: Let me resend. | 19:52 |
| lfaraone | manusheel: where are these bug numbers coming from? they are not in launchpad, nor in SL... | 19:52 |
| manusheel | lfaraone: They are yet to be reported to launchpad or SL. They came from discussions at IRC and an e-mail by David. | 19:57 |
| manusheel | ankur: Re-send both the e-mails. | 19:57 |
| ankur | manusheel: sir got it | 19:58 |
| lfaraone | manusheel: okay, they're from "USR Issue and Tracker"? | 19:58 |
| manusheel | lfaraone: Ok, I see. David pointed them to us. | 19:59 |
| manusheel | lfaraone: on IRC. | 19:59 |
| manusheel | lfaraone: Can you send me the link? | 19:59 |
| lfaraone | manusheel: okay, so there's a list of them... where? | 19:59 |
| lfaraone | manusheel: I don't have a link. I'm asking for them. | 19:59 |
| manusheel | lfaraone: They are in my e-mail right now. Let me send it at USR list serv. I prefer a wiki page for that. Can you develop one for the field issues? | 20:00 |
| manusheel | lfaraone: After documenting them well, we can add them at the bug tracker. | 20:01 |
| manusheel | lfaraone: Following the QA cycle process. | 20:01 |
| lfaraone | manusheel: I think they should probably be reported in a bug tracker *first*, such as http://launchpad.net/usr | 20:02 |
| manusheel | lfaraone: Yes. This is what I was thinking too. Don't like e-mails for QA. | 20:03 |
| manusheel | lfaraone: I'll do that at Launchpad. | 20:03 |
| manusheel | lfaraone: Will ask David to raise bugs at LP too. | 20:03 |
| lfaraone | manusheel: great. that way we've got transparency in our process, and I can figure out what in the world everyone's talking about. | 20:03 |
| ankur | lfaraone: is toolkit renamed to tools? | 20:04 |
| ankur | i mean | 20:04 |
| manusheel | lfaraone: Neat. +1 | 20:04 |
| manusheel | lfaraone: Absolutely. Transparency is the key. | 20:05 |
| ankur | i was able to find it it in lucid but not in maverick branch. IF i need to patch toolkit, what source shuld i find.When i used debchecktou , it gave more advanced version tahn 0.88 , i.e. it gace 0.89 | 20:05 |
| lfaraone | ankur: why would it be renamed to tools? | 20:05 |
| lfaraone | ankur: you couldn't locate https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sugar-toolkit-0.88? | 20:06 |
| ankur | well , i dont have idea about that , but i was reading somewhere that toolkits was obsolete. | 20:07 |
| ankur | oh, i was looking at this https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+package/python-sugar-toolkit | 20:07 |
| ankur | but couldn't find maverick one....... | 20:08 |
| ankur | sorry abt that | 20:08 |
| neeraj | lfaraone, when I run debuild on sugar-0.88 it automatically updates debian/patches directory. I have to update that patch file manually.right? http://paste.ubuntu.com/477586/ | 20:26 |
| lfaraone | neeraj: it automatically makes your changes into a patch, yes. | 20:28 |
| lfaraone | neeraj: but you should A) be creating patches yourself using quilt, and B) be tagging and naming them descriptively. | 20:28 |
| neeraj | lfaraone, ok. After creating a patch using quilt, then on LP, I have to submit the *.patch file only? | 20:37 |
| neeraj | * http://pkg-perl.alioth.debian.org/howto/quilt.html#creating_a_patch | 20:38 |
| lfaraone | neeraj: no, submit the entire debdiff. | 20:38 |
| neeraj | Ohk. but then I need to delete the automatically created file in debian/patch.. | 20:39 |
| neeraj | line 16-17 http://paste.ubuntu.com/477586/ | 20:39 |
| lfaraone | neeraj: that file is not generated if there is a patch created the quilt way that coveres your changes | 20:40 |
| neeraj | lfaraone, ok. Making changes using quilt. | 20:41 |
| neeraj | lfaraone, I am have modified the source so that while running emulator in reduced resolution, then all items of control panel becomes visible. | 21:12 |
| lfaraone | neeraj: cool, how'd you do that? | 21:12 |
| neeraj | At present they get cropped because of limited horizontal width. For this, I removed the offset margin from controlpanel/gui.py file | 21:12 |
| neeraj | Now, all items are visible. | 21:13 |
| neeraj | http://typewith.me/AvPAPKuVGb | 21:13 |
| neeraj | I am not confused with tagging. I did went through http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/ | 21:13 |
| lfaraone | Okay. | 21:19 |
| lfaraone | Why would this fix not be worth submitting upstream? | 21:19 |
| neeraj | hmm.. I was not sure whether we should send it to upstream or not. :(. | 21:24 |
| neeraj | *Changing it | 21:24 |
| lfaraone | neeraj: would people who don't use Ubuntu benefit from this? | 21:26 |
| neeraj | lfaraone, yes. they will get benefit. | 21:26 |
| lfaraone | neeraj: then that's a sign to push upstream. | 21:27 |
| neeraj | lfaraone, here upstream means the debian upstream or the sugar-0.88 main upstream | 21:27 |
| lfaraone | neeraj: do you think only people who use Ubuntu and Debian will benefit from your fix? Would Sugar as a whole be better? | 21:27 |
| neeraj | lfaraone, depends. I mean in we don't run sugar in reduced resolutions every where. Do we? | 21:29 |
| lfaraone | neeraj: that's correct, but it'd be useful regardless of whether you're using Ubuntu, Fedora, etc, right? | 21:30 |
| neeraj | lfaraone, right. :) | 21:30 |
| neeraj | lfaraone, in debian/patches series folder, some patches are comment out and some are not. How we decide it? | 21:32 |
| lfaraone | neeraj: well, commented out patches are not applied... | 21:32 |
| neeraj | lfaraone, ok. our patch will not be commented out, as I am applying the changes. | 21:34 |
| === bernie is now known as bernie_afk | ||
| neeraj | lfaraone, http://paste.ubuntu.com/477634/ debdiff file. | 22:27 |
| neeraj | Do I need to change/correct anything | 22:27 |
| lfaraone | neeraj: post it to the bug, that's the preferreed way to review a debdiff. | 22:28 |
| neeraj | lfaraone, sure :) | 22:28 |
| lfaraone | neeraj: just make sure your report has the steops to reproduce, etc, clearly written out, and subscribe me. | 22:28 |
| neeraj | lfaraone, ok. ishan has already post the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sugar-0.88/+bug/617582/ | 22:29 |
| lfaraone | neeraj: okay, post it then :) | 22:30 |
| neeraj | done. | 22:36 |
| === bernie_afk is now known as bernie | ||
| manusheel | mukul: Hi Mukul. | 22:46 |
| manusheel | Around? | 22:46 |
| mukul | manusheel sir: I think there is some problem in the latest version of Turtle Art/Block | 22:50 |
| mukul | manusheel sir: I have tried several times to package the 94 version but there is an error which doesn't seem to evade. I was able to build the package of the 93 version (changed the name to Turtle Blocks) successfully with one lintian warning for which I'm trying to figure out | 22:53 |
| manusheel | Ok, Mukul. | 22:55 |
| manusheel | mukul: Post about this issue at USR mailing list. | 22:55 |
| manusheel | mukul: Copy Neeraj, me and Dipankar on it. | 22:55 |
| mukul | manusheel sir: I think I have not subcribed to it | 22:56 |
| mukul | manusheel sir: I have subcribed to debian-olpc | 22:56 |
| mukul | manusheel sir: Okay,will do that tomorrow morning | 22:57 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!