[05:01] <ToStItOs> where is libdvdcss I cannot find it
[05:01] <well_laid_lawn> in the medibuntu repo afaik
[05:01] <well_laid_lawn> !medibuntu
[05:02] <ToStItOs> ok thank you
[05:12] <Tomwa> Anyone actually here?
[05:14] <well_laid_lawn> nope ;]
[05:42] <Tomwa> Is there a person online who can answer some questions?
[06:02] <bazhang> Tomwa, ask and see
[07:11] <Laserbeak43> hi, i'm looking but i can't find a way to install JDK(not open JDK)
[07:11] <Laserbeak43> does anyone know?
[07:12] <well_laid_lawn> the one you get from sun ?
[07:14] <Laserbeak43> well_laid_lawn: yes
[07:16] <well_laid_lawn> Laserbeak43: http://www.clickonf5.org/linux/how-install-sun-java-ubuntu-1004-lts/7777
[07:17] <Laserbeak43> well_laid_lawn: thanks
[07:17] <well_laid_lawn> np :]
[08:35] <Laserbeak43> i'm trying to run build-essential zip curl libncurses5-dev zlib1g-dev
[08:35] <Laserbeak43> and i get a message saying build-essential: command not found. can anyone tell me why?
[08:35] <well_laid_lawn> it is a package not an application
[08:36] <well_laid_lawn> !info build-essential
[08:36] <Laserbeak43> oh i have to run sudo apt-get
[08:36] <Laserbeak43> ok thanks
[08:36] <well_laid_lawn> :]
[08:37] <Laserbeak43> invalid operation build-essential
[08:37] <Laserbeak43> is what i get now :/
[08:38] <well_laid_lawn> it is   sudo apt-get install stuff
[08:38] <bazhang> install
[08:38] <bazhang> !manual | Laserbeak43 have a read
[08:39] <Laserbeak43> sudo apt-get install build-essential zip curl libncurses5-dev zlib1g-dev
[08:39] <Laserbeak43> is what i'm trying to do
[08:39] <Sysi> yay, now we can "RT!M"
[08:40] <Laserbeak43> oh
[08:40] <Laserbeak43> i did leave out install
[08:40] <Laserbeak43> it's getting late
[08:40] <Laserbeak43> sorry
[08:41] <well_laid_lawn> np :]
[10:03] <dreamtraveler> heya, i wanna make a hotkey to open terminal what is the command to use?
[10:08] <well_laid_lawn> you can do that from the menu in window manager settings
[10:08] <dreamtraveler> yeah but i dont know whats the commands to bind it to a hotkey eg in gnome is gnome-terminal
[10:09] <well_laid_lawn> o
[10:09] <well_laid_lawn> xfce4-terminal iirc
[10:10] <dreamtraveler> i see thank you
[10:10] <well_laid_lawn> the app will be in /usr/bin to check
[10:11] <dreamtraveler> thanks again
[10:37] <xubuntu081> hi
[11:44] <rileyp> youtube crashes when I slect full screen
[13:07] <justSimplyBob> Good Morning everyone
[13:23] <slow-motion> hi
[13:49] <Laserbeak43> hi slow-motion
[13:50] <Laserbeak43> is this the correct way to add variables to PATH?
[13:50] <Laserbeak43> repo init -u git://android.git.kernel.org/platform/manifest.git
[13:50] <Laserbeak43> oops
[13:50] <Laserbeak43> i mean
[13:50] <Laserbeak43> export PATH=$HOME/android-sdk/tools:$PATH
[14:10] <rileyp> youtube crashes when I slect full screen
[14:10] <Sysi> low-end machine?
[14:11] <rileyp> yeah inetl vga
[14:11] <rileyp> intel vga
[14:11] <Sysi> nonfree flash used?
[14:11] <rileyp> umm yes I think so
[14:11] <Sysi> it's flash, it's heavy and sucky, live with it
[14:12] <rileyp> medibunt enabled
[14:12] <rileyp> so unless i have good graphics card no go with flash?
[14:12] <Sysi> cpu also
[14:12] <rileyp> its intergrated inetl vga
[14:12] <rileyp> and single core ion
[14:13] <rileyp> intel gma 850 i tthink
[14:13] <Sysi> it maybe depends a bit, old intels work kinda badly with new kernels
[14:13] <rileyp> so only 1600mhz
[14:13] <rileyp> it worked in karmic
[14:14] <rileyp> If I recall correctly
[14:25] <Laserbeak> http://pastebin.org/478960 <-- i get this error when trying to install ADT, please help
[14:25] <Laserbeak> for eclipse
[15:15] <pteague_work> any ideas on how to turn off laptop speakers when plugging headphones in? i've tried a number of things yesterday & finally gave up & recompiled alsa only now i don't get anything in my headphones
[15:34] <cesc> hi there
[15:35] <cesc> I installed xbuntu on an old pc (pentium 3, 128 Mb RAM, 20 Gb HD) and everything went fine except the serial COM mouse. It doesn´t work. Any ideas how to fix it?
[16:48] <rdingram> Hello to all. I am having some trouble with nautilus taking over my desktop in Xubuntu. Has anyone else experienced this?
[16:49] <charlie-tca> Xubuntu comes with Thuar instead of Nautilus
[16:50] <rdingram> Exactly. But when I rebooted this morning I was greeted with a nautilus window. I had installed Eclipse yesterday.
[16:50] <rdingram> The problem with nautilus is that it takes over the desktop if not run with --no-desktop.
[16:51] <charlie-tca> correct
[16:51] <charlie-tca> What about removing Nautilus?
[16:51] <rdingram> So when I try to kill the nautilus process it just comes right back.
[16:51] <rdingram> Which I think would interfere with removing it.
[16:55] <rdingram> Maybe I should just drop to a shell and try to remove nautilus that way. I just don't know if it is a requirement for Eclipse/PyDev.
[16:57] <Laserbeak> why can't i install anything in eclipse?
[16:57] <Laserbeak> all kinds of errors
[16:59] <rdingram> So I removed nautilus with it running. Then I had to kill the process after removal. (strange) Now I have no desktop, but I do have the xfce toolbar. Is there a command for the Xfce desktop?
[17:00] <charlie-tca> you have the background image or a solid color?
[17:00] <knome> rdingram, xfdesktop4
[17:01] <knome> rdingram, sorry, xfdesktop
[17:01] <rdingram> @knome Bingo! Gracias.
[17:03] <rdingram> I guess Eclipse or PyDev installed some kind of bulk gnome package yesterday that included nautilus.
[17:03] <rdingram> Thank you all.
[17:04] <charlie-tca> Laserbeak: what do you mean, install anything in eclipse.
[17:09] <knome> rdingram, no problem.
[17:14]  * charlie-tca shrugs. Why ask for help if you aren't really here?
[17:15] <knome> charlie-tca, maybe he also can't answer any questions in xchat
[17:15] <knome> no, just kidding :)
[17:16] <charlie-tca> No, he has a notice up that "I'm not here right now"
[17:16] <knome> that's marked as default in pidgin (?) after 5 (?) idle minutes or so, iirc
[17:16] <knome> so it's not that he manually made that notice
[17:17] <charlie-tca> Oh, sorry then
[17:17] <knome> np ;)
[17:17] <Cr0p> any support here pleasE?
[17:17] <knome> !ask | Cr0p
[17:18] <charlie-tca> Cr0p: for Xubuntu there is
[17:19] <Cr0p> 0.0.. ok... i'm on an old portable pc(laptop).. 256 ddr266.. intel celeron (i know ! Not the best).. when i run xubutu 10.04 alternate i386.. i am having a big issue.. it does not allow me to install ANY KERNEL during the Install the base system STEP
[17:21] <Cr0p> what basically happens.. is a i get the classical error, saying i can skip the step which i know i cannot.. so around 71% of the installation this happens.. i got 3 choice of kernel.. but all three ends with same error.. so i am pretty sure it is an issue with my laptop
[17:21] <knome> what's the error?
[17:22] <Cr0p> emm... says error: unable to install <package>.. You can skip this step and run it later
[17:22] <Cr0p> when i am installing the base system
[17:22] <Cr0p> i got the partition ok.. 284mb swap and ext4 around 5gb..
 in my issue would be generic_package for the kernel :/.. I hope i knocked the right door :(
[17:25] <Cr0p> right before I clicked the "INSTALL XUBUNTU" from the selection menu I had removed the parameter quiet from the boot options and have set "acpi=off" to work as i found linux distros tend to freeze when loading for acpi
[17:29] <Cr0p> any suggestions from you guys? I'm right now downloading xubuntu desktop 9.10 i386
[17:30] <charlie-tca> did the cd pass the integrity checks?
[17:30] <Cr0p> yep
[17:30] <Cr0p> the cd looks find
[17:30] <Cr0p> i even had a verification check for bad sectors after burning
[17:30] <Cr0p> fine**
[17:31] <Cr0p> i burned the first one at 52x.. then later on decided to play safe, i burned a second one at 24x max
[17:32] <Cr0p> both ends with same error.. I'm so frustrated... tomorrow i shall try again, but frankly, I'm not putting in much hope
[17:33] <knome> Cr0p, maybe you should try the previous lts
[17:33] <knome> !lts
[17:33] <knome> hmmh
[17:33] <knome> !8.04
[17:33] <Cr0p> ohhh
[17:33] <Cr0p> wait
[17:34] <Cr0p> i need xubuntu
[17:34] <Cr0p> because of the XFCE interface which makes it really light weight...
[17:34] <Cr0p> okay.. i just got xubuntu 9.10 desktop i386 downloading
[17:35] <Cr0p> for info, i was installing using xubuntu 10.04 ALTERNATE i386
[17:35] <Cr0p> would the ALTERNATE be the issue?
[17:36] <charlie-tca> not normally.
[17:36] <Cr0p> because i clearly notice, that the KERNEL is not willing to install
[17:36] <Cr0p> ohhh, thanks for clearing this doubt..
[17:37] <Cr0p> The worst is i wasted my time downloading 10.04.. so I prefered upgrading my connection to download 9.10..
[17:37] <knome> Cr0p, there's also a xubuntu 8.04
[17:37] <Cr0p> any big difference?
[17:38] <knome> http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/xubuntu/releases/8.04/release/
[17:38] <knome> difference to what?
[17:38] <Cr0p> My expectation are having a LINUX distro, same as ubuntu.. able to do load basic apps as winex, vlc, etc
[17:38] <Cr0p> difference in kernel, etc
[17:39] <knome> it's an older version so naturally it has older kernel and older versions of applications
[17:39] <Cr0p> because since my pc is kinda old, i strongly think that the kernel is not adapting to my pc'specification
[17:39] <knome> but it might work better for you since you don't have too much memory after all
[17:39] <knome> yes, that's why i suggested 8.04
[17:39] <Cr0p> yes memory is low on my laptop :/
[17:39] <Cr0p> good thanks
[17:40] <knome> np
[17:40] <Cr0p> i'm downloading it right away
[17:40] <knome> :)
[17:40] <Cr0p> as on all system
[17:40] <Cr0p> i don't have 256mb ram full.. it is kinda shared
[17:41] <Cr0p> so 248 + 8 shared
[17:41] <knome> yup.
[17:41] <knome> that's how laptop's are built sometimes
[17:42] <Cr0p> yea.. sucks a bit :/
[17:43] <charlie-tca> Try installing xubuntu 8.04 and then running an upgrade to 10.04 before customizing too much
[17:43] <Cr0p> aieee.. the server holding the xubuntu 8.04 is so laggy 0.0.. downloading at 24kbps when i should be at 124kbps
[17:44] <knome> Cr0p, you can try the torrents
[17:44] <charlie-tca> just kill it and try again. It will use a different server
[17:44] <Cr0p> okay nice idea.. maybe from the xubuntu XFCE interface i will be able to check kernel compatibility before
[17:45] <Cr0p> i live in mauritius.. torrents here are really not the solutions here
[17:45] <Cr0p> XD
[17:45] <Cr0p> sorry for 'faulty' english.. not my mothertongue :/..
[17:47] <Cr0p> ermm.. i can notice the desktop and alternate version.. on the alternate version they say it can run below 128mb ram.. should i go for this one or stick with the desktop one?
[17:47] <knome> Cr0p, no problem, most of us do have a different native language than engligh
[17:47] <knome> g=s
[17:47] <Cr0p> btw I am grateful some people still use IRC :)
[17:47] <knome> Cr0p, if you want desktop anyway, alternative won't help you with that.
[17:48] <knome> Cr0p, the below 128 ram means you can install the command line interface with less than 128 ram
[17:48] <Cr0p> ohhh.. i see..
[17:48] <knome> Cr0p, but not really the desktop...
[17:48] <Cr0p> sorry.. i guess ubuntu is based from debian.. which makes me look stupid in some of my requests :S
[17:48] <charlie-tca> I would use the alternate image with your system
[17:48] <knome> Cr0p, that is true.
[17:48] <Cr0p> [x]ubuntu**
[17:48] <charlie-tca> It will still install the same thing as the end result
[17:49] <knome> Cr0p, ubuntu is based on debian
[17:49] <Cr0p> :0
[17:49] <knome> charlie-tca is also right. but using alternate install doesn't really make the requirement for ram with desktop any lower
[17:50] <charlie-tca> no, it doesn't. It just helps get through the install easier, sometimes. The full gui requires the same ram to run in.
[17:50] <Cr0p> okay.. i see.. my issue is kernel compatibility afterall.. my processor, ram, graphics are really a big downside..
[17:50] <knome> charlie-tca, yup :)
[17:51] <Cr0p> but i seems to go in the installation process pretty well.. so ram isn't the issue.. nor is a misburn cd or anything else
[17:51] <Cr0p> excepts what puzzles me is the "acpi=off" option which seems to be my ultimate transition from the bootscreen to the installation process
[17:52] <charlie-tca> You might try 10.04 without using that option
[17:53] <Cr0p> i tried
[17:53] <charlie-tca> okay
[17:53] <knome> i understood that didn't work *at all*
[17:53] <Cr0p> but it looks that my pc cannot handle the acpi
[17:53] <Cr0p> i tried everything i could
[17:53] <charlie-tca> I noticed somewhere between 9.04 and 10.04, the kernel got smarter and I did not need that anymore, myself.
[17:53] <Cr0p> but you guyz are my last resort
[17:54] <knome> Cr0p, nah. a local linux expert is your last resort, but that is not free. ;)
[17:54] <Cr0p> if something goes smarter, my laptop goes dummer
[17:54] <Cr0p> sure..
[17:57] <Cr0p> i hope that 8.04 is NOT too outdated, as i don't want to face a primitive gui
[17:57] <Cr0p> ^_^"
[17:59] <knome> it's still a supported
[17:59] <Cr0p> I'm "bookmarking" this channel.. tomorrow, i will come back to you! for now i am off battling my way through installing 10.04
[17:59] <Cr0p> so
[17:59] <knome> sure, good luck and have fun
[18:00] <Cr0p> you mean, it is a long term release?
[18:00] <knome> yes
[18:00] <Cr0p> i shall knome 0.0 i shall -.-
[18:00] <Cr0p> when was it released?
[18:00] <knome> supported until 04/2011
[18:00] <Cr0p> 0.0 wow
[18:00] <Sysi> !lts
[18:00] <knome> 8 == 2008, 04 == april
[18:01] <Cr0p> that IS some smart way of versioning its release
[18:01] <Cr0p> 2008.. hmmm 1-2 years after my laptop was manufactured
[18:01] <knome> yes, it's pretty straightforward
[18:02] <Cr0p> xubuntu comes build in with a good bunch of drivers?? isn't it?
[18:02] <knome> the 8.x series are still quite a lot lighter than the 9.x
[18:03] <knome> yes, pretty many drivers, but of course, the support in 8.04 is a bit worse than in the latest release
[18:03] <Sysi> on highend newer are still faster
[18:04] <knome> Sysi, yes... slightly.
[18:04] <Cr0p> newer for my laptop has inverse effet
[18:04] <Cr0p> effect**
[18:04] <Sysi> hard to say because i didn't have this hw then
[18:04] <knome> Cr0p, don't worry about Sysi, he's silly ;)
[18:04] <Sysi> i'm just stupid kid
[18:05] <Cr0p> sysi is making out a good point.. newer = better processing.. less resource consumption... except for vista -.-
[18:06] <Cr0p> if i got the slightest chance with a 8.x series... i would love it
[18:06] <Sysi> newer (always) means more ram needed
[18:06] <knome> Cr0p, i'm sure things can be sorted out at least somehow :)
[18:07] <knome> Sysi, yes, but not in vain - you also get more features etc. with newer stuff
[18:07] <Cr0p> surely.. btw, i tried all the distros all you guyz can think of, except xubuntu
[18:07] <Sysi> exherbos?
[18:07] <Sysi> :P
[18:07] <knome> Cr0p, at least you will end your journey with the best then ;)
[18:08] <Cr0p> vista = xp with new themes with bad memory management.. windows should take example from *nix systems
[18:08] <Sysi> they can't, really
[18:08] <Cr0p> exherbos?? i mean all well-known distro 0.0
[18:08] <Sysi> you said "you guyz can think"
[18:09] <knome> Sysi, no, even if he said so, i don't think you can *think*
[18:09] <Cr0p> like ubuntu, kubuntu, slax, knoppix, fedora, redhat, mandrake, little linux, puppylinux, etc
[18:09] <knome> Sysi, stop trying already
[18:09] <knome> Cr0p, dsl?
[18:09] <Cr0p> dls?
[18:09] <Cr0p> dsl?
[18:09] <Sysi> damm small linux
[18:10] <Cr0p> damn small linux.. is damn small
[18:10] <Cr0p> 0.0
[18:10] <Cr0p> had an OS even fitting on a single floppy disk..
[18:10] <knome> have to say that it might be sometimes be an even better alternative than xubuntu for low-end systems
[18:11] <Cr0p> but i'm not here for that xD.. well i will try off the LTR and give you a proper responce
[18:11] <Cr0p> xubuntu, for me, is better, but i cannot really say why
[18:12] <Cr0p> it is just the filling of hearing the "ubuntu" part
[18:12] <knome> xubuntu *does* have more features and better usability :)
[18:12] <Cr0p> feeling**
[18:12] <Cr0p> and stability
[18:12] <knome> stability i can't say much about
[18:13] <Cr0p> why??
[18:13] <knome> i don't know how stabile dsl is as i haven't tested it.
[18:14] <Cr0p> ohhh.. no worries.. i trust xubuntu as i got so much request of installing it
[18:14] <Cr0p> :)
[18:20] <Cr0p> tomorrow guyz.. timezone force me to go to bed
[18:20] <knome> Cr0p, good night and good luck
[18:20] <Cr0p> 21:20 here GMT +4..
[18:20] <Cr0p> XD
[18:20] <Cr0p> dont laugh
[18:21] <knome> nope, some people do go to bed early, and that's fine
[18:21] <Cr0p> i know its kinda early, but my website got me stucked late these days
[18:21] <Cr0p> tomorrow guys
[18:21] <knome> see you
[18:21] <Cr0p> tc
[18:38] <j-moose> Hello, Can anyone tell me which version of flash player is right for Xubuntu 10.04
[18:38] <charlie-tca> !flash
[18:39] <charlie-tca> !info flash
[18:39] <Sysi> newest
[18:39] <j-moose> Thanks
[18:39] <charlie-tca> hmm...
[18:39] <Sysi> if 64bit, newest you can find
[18:52] <rdingram> The package is "flashplugin-installer" I believe.
[18:52] <Sysi> flashplugin-nonfree if you don't want entire restricted-extras
[19:06] <j-moose> Thanks, I got it, opened the terminal followed some code as it was writing line for line, its OK now
[19:26] <Laserbeak> charlie-tca: yeah i had to leave suddenly
[19:26] <Laserbeak> sorry
[19:27] <Laserbeak> (12:01:36 PM) charlie-tca: Laserbeak: what do you mean, install anything in eclipse.
[19:27] <Laserbeak> i gett these weird errors i've never seen
[19:27] <Laserbeak> i'll paste them
[19:27] <Laserbeak> http://pastebin.org/478960
[19:28] <Laserbeak> this is what i get when trying to install ADT for android
[19:29] <Laserbeak> http://pastebin.org/479930
[19:30] <Laserbeak> someone suggested that I install PDE and then that's the error i got
[19:52] <teunvD> how are you trying to install pde?
[20:15] <ammini> Hi all..
[20:16] <ammini> I have newly started using Ubuntu
[20:16] <ammini> currently I am using xubuntu
[20:17] <ammini> can you please suggest any better version which more suitable for beginners?
[20:19] <Sysi> i started with xubuntu
[20:22] <Ileden> For beginners, I've heard good things about Mint linux too... but I would go with ubuntu.
[20:22] <Sysi> mint is ubuntu with restricted-extras and new background
[20:22] <Ileden> Sysi: really, no other changes?
[20:23] <Sysi> i'm not sure
[20:23] <Sysi> it's propable older too, and smaller community
[20:27] <well_laid_lawn> and green...
[20:28] <Sysi> green ♥
[20:29] <well_laid_lawn> heh
[21:59] <j-moose> was having some trouble earlier today with getting the flashplayer working, and then the OS found the plugins and installed them, now its great, tested it out on youtube
[22:12] <charlie-tca> Glad to hear you are enjoying Xubuntu :-)
[22:49]  * dreamtraveler zZzzZzZ
[23:14] <pcrequest> test.  i'm installing xubuntu
[23:15] <pcrequest> waiting for the setup to complete
[23:40] <Laserbeak> does xubuntu come with an editor that detects CRs?
[23:41] <Laserbeak> i'm trying to find them on command-line but it's not working
[23:42] <Laserbeak> i guess i could use eclipse
[23:46] <Laserbeak> nope
[23:46] <Laserbeak> that didn't work
[23:48] <teunvD> what's a CRs if I may ask?
[23:49] <Laserbeak> teunvD: Carriage Returns
[23:49] <Laserbeak> from windows files
[23:49] <teunvD> ah offcourse
[23:50] <teunvD> what do you want to use the software for? except for detecting the Crs
[23:51] <Laserbeak> i want to remove them from a script
[23:51] <Laserbeak> bash script
[23:53] <pcrequest> so i can get help here?  i installed xubuntu 10.4.  setup seemed to go well, however on reboot, i get a grub rescue prompt. not sure what to do.
[23:53] <j-moose> hi, does anyone have some advise on how to get netflix to stream to Xubuntu?, It tells me the OS is not supported.
[23:55] <teunvD> Laserbeak: you might want to install the package 'fromdos' this includes a program called dos2unix which will delete the CRs from your scripts
[23:55] <Laserbeak> yep
[23:55] <Laserbeak> i think i will thanks
[23:55] <Laserbeak> trying to get it sorted in bash but nothing's working
[23:55] <teunvD> Laserbeak: sorry typo, the package is called: 'tofrodos'
[23:56] <Laserbeak> thanks
[23:56] <j-moose> got it
[23:58] <andyn> every time i try playing a video with totem in lucid my system crashes with blank screen, switching to text console doesn't work and after reboot xorg log says "Failed to submit batchbuffer: Input/output error". how should i start hunting down the problem?