| === neeraj_ is now known as neeraj | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === fta__ is now known as fta | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === lifeless_ is now known as lifeless | ||
| Rhonda | ScottK: Who is Danilo? | 07:54 |
|---|---|---|
| chilicuil | hi, good afternoon, when dealing with bzr branches and quilt, should I remove the patches pile before using debcommit? | 08:16 |
| chilicuil | I've added a new patch to a pkg using quilt and then I've used debcommit (leaving the changes), when I run $ bzr bd -- -S -uc -us, I get the following error: "dpkg-source: error: cannot read xsane-0.997.orig.oG0rqG/debian/patches/fix_umask_permitions.patch: No such file or directory", that patch is the one I made, what I'm doing wrong?, is this the correct channel?, or should I ask in another one? | 08:26 |
| tumbleweed | did you bzr add that patch? | 08:33 |
| chilicuil | tumbleweed: not afaik | 08:34 |
| chilicuil | tumbleweed: ok, that made the trick, thx, and sry to bother u | 08:36 |
| tumbleweed | chilicuil: np | 08:51 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === duanedesign is now known as duanedesign_____ | ||
| === duanedesign_____ is now known as duanedesign | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| ScottK | Rhonda: No idea. | 10:36 |
| ScottK | Just odd that anyone not you is editing your page. | 10:36 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === easter_egg|off is now known as easter_egg | ||
| === easter_egg is now known as easter_egg|off | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| AnAnt | what's the difference between base.cow & base.tgz ? I mean | 11:59 |
| AnAnt | I mean, will creation of a base.cow will download packages again, if I already have a base.tgz ? | 11:59 |
| AnAnt | bilalakhtar: welcome back | 12:01 |
| AnAnt | does 616685 need FFe ? | 12:01 |
| AnAnt | ^ LP #616685 | 12:02 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 616685 in nginx (Ubuntu) "Please merge nginx 0.7.67-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/616685 | 12:02 |
| bilalakhtar | AnAnt: I don't think so | 12:02 |
| bilalakhtar | AnAnt: no feature is being added | 12:03 |
| ari-tczew | AnAnt, bilalakhtar: if this upload will fix any bug, it doesn't need FFe | 12:03 |
| Laney | no | 12:03 |
| Laney | if the upload does not introduce any new features, that's the test | 12:03 |
| bilalakhtar | ari-tczew and Laney: The only changes being incorporated are that an extra configure option is being added | 12:03 |
| bilalakhtar | and Standards-Version is being bumped | 12:04 |
| bilalakhtar | no need for FFe | 12:04 |
| Laney | bilalakhtar: It'd be nice if you pasted the entire new changelog into the bug | 12:04 |
| Laney | oh, sorry, AnAnt | 12:04 |
| bilalakhtar | Laney: I filed the merge | 12:04 |
| Laney | well, whoever :P | 12:04 |
| ari-tczew | bilalakhtar: upstream changelog | 12:04 |
| Laney | if it's a new upstream release then that too indeed | 12:05 |
| bilalakhtar | ari-tczew: Why? | 12:05 |
| bilalakhtar | ari-tczew: Its not a new upstream release | 12:05 |
| bilalakhtar | Laney: ^^ | 12:06 |
| Laney | I know. | 12:06 |
| Laney | put in what's appropriate and sensible basically | 12:06 |
| bilalakhtar | The problem is | 12:06 |
| bilalakhtar | The current Ubuntu package installes files in /var/www | 12:07 |
| ari-tczew | if merge doesn't include new upstream, you don't need include upstream changelog :) | 12:07 |
| bilalakhtar | Laney: ^^ | 12:07 |
| bilalakhtar | ari-tczew: We never include upstream changelog | 12:07 |
| Laney | If you want the sponsors to be able to easily confirm that it doesn't need a FFe then include as much detail as you can | 12:08 |
| ari-tczew | bilalakhtar: ehh, listen: if you want to upload a merge and this package includes new usptream release, then in bug you have to paste an upstream changelog | 12:08 |
| ari-tczew | during FFe of course | 12:08 |
| bilalakhtar | ari-tczew: But not in debian/changelog, right? That's what I meant | 12:08 |
| AnAnt | bilalakhtar: ? | 12:09 |
| bilalakhtar | AnAnt: ?? | 12:09 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| bilalakhtar | fta: You have been disconnecting every now and then | 12:09 |
| ari-tczew | bilalakhtar: yea, most upstream changelog is in file called ChangeLog | 12:09 |
| ari-tczew | or NEWS | 12:09 |
| Laney | in the bug | 12:09 |
| AnAnt | bilalakhtar: I think that you would have to put the changelog entry of -3 | 12:09 |
| fta | bilalakhtar, i know. it sucks. that's my adsl link flapping | 12:09 |
| bilalakhtar | fta: I have also faced a problem like yours | 12:10 |
| bilalakhtar | AnAnt: Why? | 12:10 |
| AnAnt | bilalakhtar: in case the debian packaging introduced a new feature for example, you said something about adding an extra config option | 12:11 |
| bilalakhtar | config option? ^^ | 12:11 |
| AnAnt | AFAIK, Debian is considered upstream for Ubuntu | 12:11 |
| bilalakhtar | AnAnt: yes | 12:11 |
| Laney | It's just nice for the sponsors | 12:11 |
| bilalakhtar | Debian is upstream for us | 12:11 |
| Laney | to be able to see what changes you are making | 12:11 |
| bilalakhtar | AnAnt: But FF blocks UP-Upstream updates | 12:11 |
| Laney | no | 12:11 |
| fta | bilalakhtar, started a few weeks ago, but nothing's wrong on my side. it's somewhere in the network but tricky to isolate | 12:11 |
| ari-tczew | bilalakhtar: I encourage you to fix RC bugs | 12:34 |
| ari-tczew | you can fix rc bug by sync/merge | 12:34 |
| bilalakhtar | ari-tczew: rc bugs? | 12:34 |
| ari-tczew | just you need to test if it works | 12:34 |
| bilalakhtar | What's that? | 12:34 |
| ari-tczew | bilalakhtar: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/bugs/rcbugs/maverick/ | 12:35 |
| bilalakhtar | fta_: again? :( I understand | 12:36 |
| fta_ | bilalakhtar, yep, 20~30 times a day :( | 12:36 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| LucidFox | Is there a specific team responsible for maintaining Wine in Ubuntu? | 13:14 |
| LucidFox | I'm in favor of including the winepulse patches into the Ubuntu build of Wine, but I feel like uploading them right away would be steamrolling. | 13:14 |
| geser | LucidFox: if things didn't change then YokoZar is taking care of wine in Ubuntu | 13:15 |
| YokoZar | LucidFox: the "Wine Team" is me | 13:16 |
| LucidFox | YokoZar> Ah, good | 13:16 |
| YokoZar | LucidFox: And I'm watching the pulse situation pretty closely | 13:16 |
| YokoZar | For openal-based games Wine 1.2 actually uses native OpenAL now (next step is to expand mmdevapi.dll to use openAL for other programs) | 13:17 |
| LucidFox | Well, I know they're going to implement a New and Improved sound architecture in some distant release, but until then, I have long been running the vivnet PPA builds with the winepulse patches | 13:17 |
| LucidFox | YokoZar> Why does Wine try to build on multiple architectures? Wouldn't Architecture: amd64, i386 make more sense? | 13:32 |
| LucidFox | it fails to build on any other one anyway | 13:33 |
| shadeslayer | YokoZar: poke | 13:37 |
| shadeslayer | do you know about software-properties package ? | 13:38 |
| shadeslayer | like the internal workings and stuff | 13:38 |
| shadeslayer | bah.. not here | 13:39 |
| shadeslayer | YokoZar: software-properties-kde is broken, it cant "Select Best Server" , backtrace here : http://pastebin.com/Jns8SW7X, will try and fix | 13:40 |
| shadeslayer | if the new package doesnt fix it already | 13:40 |
| YokoZar | shadeslayer: no | 13:41 |
| YokoZar | shadeslayer: I want to know more about it eventually though | 13:41 |
| shadeslayer | ok... well ill wait for mvo then | 13:41 |
| shadeslayer | and try to fix with no idea of python internals :p | 13:42 |
| bdrung | chilicui1: around? | 15:34 |
| chilicui1 | bdrung: yep | 15:34 |
| bdrung | chilicui1: regarding bug #462193. i recommend to use the full name in the changelog stanza and not the nick name. | 15:35 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 462193 in djvulibre (Ubuntu Lucid) "djvulibre-bin produces garbage in the root (/man1/*)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/462193 | 15:35 |
| bdrung | "-- chilicuil <chilicuil@i.am> Thu, 12 Aug 2010 17:02:53 -0500" | 15:35 |
| chilicui1 | bdrung: ok, I'll do it next time, thx for the comment | 15:38 |
| bdrung | chilicui1: can you update the debdiff or give me your real name (then i can fix it)? | 15:39 |
| chilicui1 | bdrung: sure, it's "Javier Perez Lopez" | 15:40 |
| bdrung | chilicui1: uploaded | 15:50 |
| chilicui1 | bdrung: thx =) | 15:50 |
| bdrung | yw | 15:50 |
| bdrung | chilicui1: you might want to add your realname to https://launchpad.net/~chilicuil | 15:58 |
| chilicui1 | bdrung: oki doki | 15:59 |
| === easter_egg|off is now known as easter_egg | ||
| === easter_egg is now known as easter_egg|off | ||
| AnAnt | Hello, is removing an un-necessary package from Depends , something that requires a FFe ? | 16:53 |
| geser | no | 16:56 |
| AnAnt | so I can immediately upload the package ? | 16:57 |
| geser | FF is to stop "adding features" and to concentrate on to fix/stabilise the existing ones | 16:57 |
| geser | sure | 16:58 |
| AnAnt | ok | 16:58 |
| AnAnt | hmm, I am using syncpackage to sync zekr from experimental. Currently maverick has the -0ubuntu1 revision, and I am syncing -1, now why is the source.changes having the orig tarball ? | 17:09 |
| Laney | just use requestsync ;) | 17:10 |
| AnAnt | Laney: and ? | 17:11 |
| bdrung | AnAnt: maybe a bug? | 17:11 |
| Laney | it does rather sound like a bug | 17:11 |
| AnAnt | bdrung: well, syncpackage gives those messages: | 17:11 |
| AnAnt | syncpackage: Warning: Overwriting modified Ubuntu version 1.0.0+repack-0ubuntu1, setting current version to 1.0.0+repack-0 | 17:11 |
| AnAnt | parsechangelog/debian: warning: 'since' option specifies non-existing version | 17:11 |
| AnAnt | parsechangelog/debian: warning: use newest entry that is smaller than the one specified | 17:11 |
| bdrung | syncpackage: D: needs source tarball: False | 17:13 |
| AnAnt | bdrung: yup, I get that with verbose option | 17:16 |
| bdrung | AnAnt: ok, found it. i will fix it | 17:17 |
| AnAnt | bdrung: line 276 ? | 17:18 |
| bdrung | line 281 | 17:18 |
| AnAnt | you want to add if ! need_orig ? | 17:19 |
| AnAnt | or just else: | 17:19 |
| bdrung | AnAnt: pushed | 17:21 |
| bdrung | to lp:ubuntu-dev-tools | 17:21 |
| AnAnt | bdrung: thanks, I manually fixed it here | 17:21 |
| bdrung | AnAnt: you're welcome. | 17:22 |
| === ubuntujenkins__ is now known as jenkins_ | ||
| === jenkins_ is now known as jenkins | ||
| === IVBela1 is now known as IVBela | ||
| Rhonda | ScottK: Didn't you edit it, too? :P | 18:10 |
| === DreamThi1f is now known as DreamThief | ||
| jenkins | I am trying to write a debian rules file for a project I am working on. I do not have any questions yet but which channel would be best to ask questions in? | 21:08 |
| geser | #ubuntu-packaging | 21:09 |
| jenkins | thanks geser | 21:10 |
| shadeslayer | bug 603831 if anyone is interested | 23:41 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 603831 in fprint-demo (Ubuntu) "Please Merge fprint-demo from debian" [Wishlist,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/603831 | 23:41 |
| geser | shadeslayer: as this a new upstream version (sort of), have you checked if any new features got added? | 23:50 |
| shadeslayer | err...no, ill do that right now | 23:50 |
| shadeslayer | i guess ill need a FFe if that is true | 23:51 |
| geser | yes | 23:51 |
| shadeslayer | http://pastebin.com/yUqajX7j | 23:53 |
| shadeslayer | thats the NEWS file | 23:53 |
| shadeslayer | nothing new there | 23:53 |
| geser | and in the git commit log also nothing that would qualify as new feature | 23:56 |
| geser | so looks like you got lucky not needing a FFe :) | 23:57 |
| shadeslayer | ^_^ | 23:58 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!