=== neeraj_ is now known as neeraj === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === fta__ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === lifeless_ is now known as lifeless [07:54] ScottK: Who is Danilo? [08:16] hi, good afternoon, when dealing with bzr branches and quilt, should I remove the patches pile before using debcommit? [08:26] I've added a new patch to a pkg using quilt and then I've used debcommit (leaving the changes), when I run $ bzr bd -- -S -uc -us, I get the following error: "dpkg-source: error: cannot read xsane-0.997.orig.oG0rqG/debian/patches/fix_umask_permitions.patch: No such file or directory", that patch is the one I made, what I'm doing wrong?, is this the correct channel?, or should I ask in another one? [08:33] did you bzr add that patch? [08:34] tumbleweed: not afaik [08:36] tumbleweed: ok, that made the trick, thx, and sry to bother u [08:51] chilicuil: np === fta_ is now known as fta === duanedesign is now known as duanedesign_____ === duanedesign_____ is now known as duanedesign === fta_ is now known as fta === yofel_ is now known as yofel === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta [10:36] Rhonda: No idea. [10:36] Just odd that anyone not you is editing your page. === fta_ is now known as fta === easter_egg|off is now known as easter_egg === easter_egg is now known as easter_egg|off === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta [11:59] what's the difference between base.cow & base.tgz ? I mean [11:59] I mean, will creation of a base.cow will download packages again, if I already have a base.tgz ? [12:01] bilalakhtar: welcome back [12:01] does 616685 need FFe ? [12:02] ^ LP #616685 [12:02] Launchpad bug 616685 in nginx (Ubuntu) "Please merge nginx 0.7.67-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/616685 [12:02] AnAnt: I don't think so [12:03] AnAnt: no feature is being added [12:03] AnAnt, bilalakhtar: if this upload will fix any bug, it doesn't need FFe [12:03] no [12:03] if the upload does not introduce any new features, that's the test [12:03] ari-tczew and Laney: The only changes being incorporated are that an extra configure option is being added [12:04] and Standards-Version is being bumped [12:04] no need for FFe [12:04] bilalakhtar: It'd be nice if you pasted the entire new changelog into the bug [12:04] oh, sorry, AnAnt [12:04] Laney: I filed the merge [12:04] well, whoever :P [12:04] bilalakhtar: upstream changelog [12:05] if it's a new upstream release then that too indeed [12:05] ari-tczew: Why? [12:05] ari-tczew: Its not a new upstream release [12:06] Laney: ^^ [12:06] I know. [12:06] put in what's appropriate and sensible basically [12:06] The problem is [12:07] The current Ubuntu package installes files in /var/www [12:07] if merge doesn't include new upstream, you don't need include upstream changelog :) [12:07] Laney: ^^ [12:07] ari-tczew: We never include upstream changelog [12:08] If you want the sponsors to be able to easily confirm that it doesn't need a FFe then include as much detail as you can [12:08] bilalakhtar: ehh, listen: if you want to upload a merge and this package includes new usptream release, then in bug you have to paste an upstream changelog [12:08] during FFe of course [12:08] ari-tczew: But not in debian/changelog, right? That's what I meant [12:09] bilalakhtar: ? [12:09] AnAnt: ?? === fta_ is now known as fta [12:09] fta: You have been disconnecting every now and then [12:09] bilalakhtar: yea, most upstream changelog is in file called ChangeLog [12:09] or NEWS [12:09] in the bug [12:09] bilalakhtar: I think that you would have to put the changelog entry of -3 [12:09] bilalakhtar, i know. it sucks. that's my adsl link flapping [12:10] fta: I have also faced a problem like yours [12:10] AnAnt: Why? [12:11] bilalakhtar: in case the debian packaging introduced a new feature for example, you said something about adding an extra config option [12:11] config option? ^^ [12:11] AFAIK, Debian is considered upstream for Ubuntu [12:11] AnAnt: yes [12:11] It's just nice for the sponsors [12:11] Debian is upstream for us [12:11] to be able to see what changes you are making [12:11] AnAnt: But FF blocks UP-Upstream updates [12:11] no [12:11] bilalakhtar, started a few weeks ago, but nothing's wrong on my side. it's somewhere in the network but tricky to isolate [12:34] bilalakhtar: I encourage you to fix RC bugs [12:34] you can fix rc bug by sync/merge [12:34] ari-tczew: rc bugs? [12:34] just you need to test if it works [12:34] What's that? [12:35] bilalakhtar: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/bugs/rcbugs/maverick/ [12:36] fta_: again? :( I understand [12:36] bilalakhtar, yep, 20~30 times a day :( === fta_ is now known as fta [13:14] Is there a specific team responsible for maintaining Wine in Ubuntu? [13:14] I'm in favor of including the winepulse patches into the Ubuntu build of Wine, but I feel like uploading them right away would be steamrolling. [13:15] LucidFox: if things didn't change then YokoZar is taking care of wine in Ubuntu [13:16] LucidFox: the "Wine Team" is me [13:16] YokoZar> Ah, good [13:16] LucidFox: And I'm watching the pulse situation pretty closely [13:17] For openal-based games Wine 1.2 actually uses native OpenAL now (next step is to expand mmdevapi.dll to use openAL for other programs) [13:17] Well, I know they're going to implement a New and Improved sound architecture in some distant release, but until then, I have long been running the vivnet PPA builds with the winepulse patches [13:32] YokoZar> Why does Wine try to build on multiple architectures? Wouldn't Architecture: amd64, i386 make more sense? [13:33] it fails to build on any other one anyway [13:37] YokoZar: poke [13:38] do you know about software-properties package ? [13:38] like the internal workings and stuff [13:39] bah.. not here [13:40] YokoZar: software-properties-kde is broken, it cant "Select Best Server" , backtrace here : http://pastebin.com/Jns8SW7X, will try and fix [13:40] if the new package doesnt fix it already [13:41] shadeslayer: no [13:41] shadeslayer: I want to know more about it eventually though [13:41] ok... well ill wait for mvo then [13:42] and try to fix with no idea of python internals :p [15:34] chilicui1: around? [15:34] bdrung: yep [15:35] chilicui1: regarding bug #462193. i recommend to use the full name in the changelog stanza and not the nick name. [15:35] Launchpad bug 462193 in djvulibre (Ubuntu Lucid) "djvulibre-bin produces garbage in the root (/man1/*)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/462193 [15:35] "-- chilicuil Thu, 12 Aug 2010 17:02:53 -0500" [15:38] bdrung: ok, I'll do it next time, thx for the comment [15:39] chilicui1: can you update the debdiff or give me your real name (then i can fix it)? [15:40] bdrung: sure, it's "Javier Perez Lopez" [15:50] chilicui1: uploaded [15:50] bdrung: thx =) [15:50] yw [15:58] chilicui1: you might want to add your realname to https://launchpad.net/~chilicuil [15:59] bdrung: oki doki === easter_egg|off is now known as easter_egg === easter_egg is now known as easter_egg|off [16:53] Hello, is removing an un-necessary package from Depends , something that requires a FFe ? [16:56] no [16:57] so I can immediately upload the package ? [16:57] FF is to stop "adding features" and to concentrate on to fix/stabilise the existing ones [16:58] sure [16:58] ok [17:09] hmm, I am using syncpackage to sync zekr from experimental. Currently maverick has the -0ubuntu1 revision, and I am syncing -1, now why is the source.changes having the orig tarball ? [17:10] just use requestsync ;) [17:11] Laney: and ? [17:11] AnAnt: maybe a bug? [17:11] it does rather sound like a bug [17:11] bdrung: well, syncpackage gives those messages: [17:11] syncpackage: Warning: Overwriting modified Ubuntu version 1.0.0+repack-0ubuntu1, setting current version to 1.0.0+repack-0 [17:11] parsechangelog/debian: warning: 'since' option specifies non-existing version [17:11] parsechangelog/debian: warning: use newest entry that is smaller than the one specified [17:13] syncpackage: D: needs source tarball: False [17:16] bdrung: yup, I get that with verbose option [17:17] AnAnt: ok, found it. i will fix it [17:18] bdrung: line 276 ? [17:18] line 281 [17:19] you want to add if ! need_orig ? [17:19] or just else: [17:21] AnAnt: pushed [17:21] to lp:ubuntu-dev-tools [17:21] bdrung: thanks, I manually fixed it here [17:22] AnAnt: you're welcome. === ubuntujenkins__ is now known as jenkins_ === jenkins_ is now known as jenkins === IVBela1 is now known as IVBela [18:10] ScottK: Didn't you edit it, too? :P === DreamThi1f is now known as DreamThief [21:08] I am trying to write a debian rules file for a project I am working on. I do not have any questions yet but which channel would be best to ask questions in? [21:09] #ubuntu-packaging [21:10] thanks geser [23:41] bug 603831 if anyone is interested [23:41] Launchpad bug 603831 in fprint-demo (Ubuntu) "Please Merge fprint-demo from debian" [Wishlist,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/603831 [23:50] shadeslayer: as this a new upstream version (sort of), have you checked if any new features got added? [23:50] err...no, ill do that right now [23:51] i guess ill need a FFe if that is true [23:51] yes [23:53] http://pastebin.com/yUqajX7j [23:53] thats the NEWS file [23:53] nothing new there [23:56] and in the git commit log also nothing that would qualify as new feature [23:57] so looks like you got lucky not needing a FFe :) [23:58] ^_^