[00:01] <ubottu> In #ubuntu-irc, rww said: !no, tor-gpg is <reply> freenode blocks connections from Tor users on its regular servers. Users registered with nickserv can connect to freenode's Tor hidden service instead; see http://freenode.net/irc_servers.shtml#tor for instructions. For help, ask in #freenode.
[00:05] <Tm_T> !no, tor-gpg is <reply> freenode blocks connections from Tor users on its regular servers. Users registered with nickserv can connect to freenode's Tor hidden service instead; see http://freenode.net/irc_servers.shtml#tor for instructions. For help, ask in #freenode.
[00:05] <ubottu> I'll remember that Tm_T
[02:54] <ubottu> ilovefairuz called the ops in #ubuntu (Bookman)
[02:57] <ubottu> headkase314 called the ops in #ubuntu (Bookman)
[02:58] <ilovefairuz>  !ops was triggered twice
[02:58] <ubottu> Error: I am only a bot, please don't think I'm intelligent :)
[02:58] <ubottu> FloodBot1 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (repeated abuse from bookman)
[03:09] <bazhang> seems like a simple misunderstanding
[03:18] <maco> there is a user in #ubuntu with the nick "peepingtom"  *blink blink*
[03:26] <bazhang> yikes
[03:27] <maco> so you remember the Lord-Nikon person earlier with the alsa v. oss thing?
[03:27] <bazhang> yep
[03:27] <maco> he went to #alsa and was complaining about something and said he was using Arch
[03:27] <bazhang> that was Murdox I believe
[03:27] <maco> so crimsun's like "oh ok well if you're an arch user you know how to apply a patch.. *whips up a patch* here you go!"
[03:28] <maco> and then he refusedto apply it
[03:28] <maco> and went all flouncy "i'll just go back to bsd!"
[03:28] <bazhang> master ban / kline evader murdox
[03:29] <maco> crimsun showed up to the loco meeting today complaining about this guy in #alsa ... and im like "oh yeah we had a guy in #ubuntu ...." "wait...was his nick...?"
[03:38] <ubottu> FloodBot1 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (repeated abuse from xissburg)
[03:40] <IdleOne> xissburg has been trying to get this issue fixed since last night, I think we should let nUboon2Age finish helping him
[03:41] <bazhang> yeah
[03:42] <bazhang> the end of the xissburg era
[03:42] <bazhang> or is that epoch?
[03:44] <IdleOne> I realize it seems like a windows issue but it started with Wubi and they have to save the Win7 boot loader to get stuff resolved and running, little lattitude in this case I think is ok, besides think he will get any better help in ##windows
[03:44] <IdleOne> ?
[03:50] <bazhang> nah you're right
[03:50] <bazhang> everyone's a bit jumpy after the poker incident
[03:51] <IdleOne> poker?
[03:51]  * IdleOne ws offline for 30 minutes or so due to nvidia and 10.10
[03:53] <bazhang> the ops call a bit ago between bookman and ilovefairuz
[03:53] <bazhang> PM'd them all and it seems to have dissipated
[03:53] <IdleOne> oh ok
[09:43] <ubottu> FloodBot3 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (banlist filling up: 526 bans)
[14:16] <ubottu> FloodBot3 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (banlist filling up: 526 bans)
[15:28] <oCean_> Hi
[15:28] <oCean_> RogProg is spamming in #ubuntu
[15:31] <oCean_> ah well, he left just now.. with a promise <I_am_q> be back,..   apologize for the inconvininece!
[16:04] <bazhang> fb3 seems not to be warning about floods
[16:28] <ubottu> FloodBot3 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (banlist filling up: 527 bans)
[16:52] <bazhang> * [au_] (sam@2001:470:c281::3): SP wonder if that is murdox / fellow from yesterday
[16:54] <bazhang> Lord-Nikon iirc
[17:13] <ikonia> bazhang: isn't he banned ?
[17:14] <bazhang> ikonia, yes, but not 100% sure they are the same fellow
[17:14] <bazhang> dave@2001:470:1f04:f6b::f38f
[17:14] <bazhang> was Lord-Nikon
[17:15] <knome> cyberwolf82 / xeit / zlt @2001:470:802c:*
[17:16] <knome> *92
[17:16] <ikonia> that's a different subnet totally as I read IPV6
[17:16] <bazhang> sorry then.
[17:16] <ikonia> no no
[17:17] <ikonia> no need for that, I'm not %100 either, I'm only just starting to get my head around IPV6
[17:17] <bazhang> he was so easily able to ban evade just being cautious
[17:17] <knome> yeah, he said he starts to use his tunnels and i'm sure there's a way for him to change his ipv6 net
[17:18] <ikonia> what trolls say and what they can actually do, often do not add up
[17:18] <knome> no, but he did change the subnet yesterday already
[17:18] <ikonia> eg: Panarchy used to threaten to get around ban's and take the channel down, he could do neither
[17:18] <bazhang> true
[17:19] <knome> he did seem to know *something* :)
[17:19] <ikonia> best thing I can suggest is keep an eye on it, as I'm not strong enough with ipv6 to be certain
[17:19] <bazhang> well he reveals himself shortly after he starts typing
[17:20] <marienz> there are multiple free tunnelbrokers, and it's probably doable to register multiple accounts or multiple tunnels per account on some of them.
[17:21] <marienz> also, you'll frequently want to ban an entire /64, and in some cases an entire /48
[17:22] <ikonia> not sure we could do that
[17:22] <marienz> I don't follow.
[17:22] <ikonia> banning a /48 range wouldn't sit well with the ircc unless we are sure that whole range is just for that one issue user
[17:23] <marienz> hurricaneelectric (he.net/tunnelbroker.net) happily hands out an entire /48 on request (to a free account holder)
[17:23] <ikonia> while that may seem sensible to ban, the #ubuntu policy is a little more strict on setting such a wide ban
[17:23] <marienz> so yeah, don't ban the entire /48 by default, but don't be surprised if you get them coming back from different /64s in the same /48 (and ban the entire /48 when that happens)
[17:24] <ikonia> wouldn't surprise me in the least, if I had access to a /48 and I banned an address, I'd just move up 1 in the range
[17:24] <marienz> exactly
[17:26] <marienz> and again: I'm not saying you should start by banning entire /48s, because he.net *also* hands out individual routed /64s
[18:19] <Jordan_U> NOWARMAKESEX keeps joining #ubuntu and leaving with a previous message from another user in thier quit message.
[18:19] <bazhang> Jordan_U, banned
[18:20] <Jordan_U> Too fast, thanks :)
[18:48] <jpds> c3l is annoying.
[18:49] <ubottu> In ubottu, rebecca_ said: md5 check is fine - any other ideas
[19:41] <IdleOne> ikonia: I was debating if i should or shouldn't
[19:41] <IdleOne> you decided for me
[19:41] <ikonia> good
[20:08] <ikonia> howdy nick
[20:08] <ikonia> bye nick
[21:47] <ubottu> In ubottu, bdrung said: this is a test
[21:54] <funkyHat> I was only 99% sure, but now he's telling us Songbird is a good looking stylish player, I *know* he's a troll ;(
[22:02] <mneptok> Songbird is a dead-end on Linux
[22:10] <knome> it's horribly slow.
[22:13] <Flannel> It's based on XUL, what do you expect?
[22:14] <knome> i don't judge applications by what they are based on
[22:19] <topyli> i liked how it displayed my music collection if i threw it on my web server
[22:19] <topyli> i did't like much else though
[22:20] <nhandler> Well, they are still producing unofficial packages of the latest versions for Ubuntu (which is nice for the people who use it)
[22:21] <topyli> yes there's a team of hackers who still maintain it