[09:22] <klattimer> seb128: people are reporting problems with the ibus patch :/
[09:22] <klattimer> I think it's related to the missing ibus-m17n in packaging and some files not being repackaged for this release
[09:23] <klattimer> pretty sure it's a packaging bug, and I know the code changes work, so I think this makes it not my bug?
[09:23]  * vish grumbles at klattimer for replacing his icon ;p
[09:23] <vish> j/k
[09:23] <klattimer> vish?
[09:23] <klattimer> which icon did I replace?
[09:23] <vish> klattimer: the ibus icon :)
[09:23] <klattimer> oh you drew the default one?
[09:24] <seb128> hey klattimer
[09:24] <vish> yeah..
[09:24] <klattimer> that's no worry, as the default one still shows between input method windows
[09:24] <seb128> not sure what the issue is, I would like to let people who know ibus to try to understand it
[09:24] <klattimer> it swaps to and from the selected input method / default when a space to type is selected in a supporting window
[09:25] <klattimer> I'm assuming there's been a major change in make/make install since 1.2
[09:26] <seb128> why?
[09:30] <klattimer> well because one of the packages is no longer built
[09:31] <klattimer> maybe that's just a packager change though
[09:41] <seb128> klattimer, the debian ibus guys subscribed to the bug should know about that
[09:42] <seb128> but how does the non indicator version display icons then?
[09:42] <klattimer> well in the same way that we do in the indicator now
[09:42] <klattimer> thing is, it doesn't appear to be working post upgrade, languages don't seem to be available or not working
[09:42] <klattimer> when I tested with latex it worked fine
[09:43] <klattimer> but some users using packs from a ppa don't see the icons, and I can't do korean anymore in my test
[09:43] <klattimer> so the changes to the code *should* do the right thing, but somewhere between the package update it's lost some supporting stuff
[09:46] <seb128> klattimer, right, seems rather an ibus issue than an indicator one
[09:46] <seb128> you cna just wait for people knowing ibus to comment
[09:46] <seb128> seems rather a bug in the ibus packaging or ibus than one in the change
[09:59] <Cimi> iainfarrell: where's otto? :)
[10:00] <iainfarrell> hey Cimi
[10:00] <iainfarrell> he's here
[10:00] <iainfarrell> but maybe not signed in
[10:00] <iainfarrell> I'll go see him, 2 secs
[10:03] <Cimi> I'll be back in few minutes
[10:42] <vish> iainfarrell: hey, we are now at 81..! :)
[10:43] <iainfarrell> hello vish
[10:44] <iainfarrell> That's fantastic!
[10:44] <iainfarrell> a blog post? :)
[10:44] <vish> iainfarrell: hmm , not yet, but dint wanna make you feel used ;p
[10:44] <iainfarrell> heh vish
[10:45] <iainfarrell> that's fine
[10:45] <iainfarrell> if you want to write one, feels like a milestone
[10:45] <iainfarrell> let me know
[10:45] <iainfarrell> happy to push the button
[10:45] <vish> iainfarrell: sure :)
[15:59] <klattimer> seb128: is there anyone around that knows ibus's codebase?
[15:59] <seb128> no
[15:59] <klattimer> I can't tell if the bug that's left after recent updates is mine or someone elses, I'm assuming it's mine
[15:59] <klattimer> :/
[15:59] <klattimer> I'll keep digging see what I come up with
[22:06] <kklimonda> where is the discussion with GTK+ developers about utouch patches?
[22:06] <kklimonda> or hasn't there been one yet again? :/