[09:09] <ara> good morning!
[09:11] <davmor2> morning
[09:23] <KE1HA> GM ..
[09:24] <ara> Morning KE1HA
[09:24] <KE1HA> Just about done, doing KDE and Netbook now. You still in meetings today?
[09:31] <ara> KE1HA, yes, all week
[09:32] <KE1HA> Fun Fun :-)
[09:37] <bladernr> KE1HA:  how'd LTSP go?
[09:37] <bladernr> ara:  suggestion on what to file bug against decrypting the LVM on -server?
[09:37] <bladernr> after install, on the running system
[09:38] <ara> bladernr, yes, what happens
[09:39] <bladernr> every time you type a single character when entering the password, the terminal prints a line of output saying: Unlocking the disk /path/to/disk
[09:39] <bladernr> minor issue, but annoying
[09:40] <ara> plymouth, I guess
[09:40] <bladernr> mmmkay... works for me :)
[09:40] <KE1HA> LTSP, not going so well. Dont know if it's a config issue on my end or not, so I'm test everything else first then go back to it.
[09:41] <bladernr> I'll see if I can set mine up again this afternoon... I've got everything set up, just need to install the OS and see what happens.
[09:41] <KE1HA> Other than that, and Ubuquity being seriously slow on my i386 box, things are going nicely.
[09:41] <KE1HA> I tried to reproduce that charter map bug, but still not seeing it.
[10:05] <KE1HA> I think I may have got it bladernr I need to look when I'm done running these two current tests, but I didn't set the Boot-Order on the Think Client.
[10:05] <KE1HA> Thin&
[10:10] <bladernr> KE1HA:  yeah, you have to set boot order (or at least hit f12(vbox) when it boots to get the boot menu
[10:10] <bladernr> I'm installing it now for 32bit.
[10:11] <KE1HA> I think I know what it is, booting the server now.
[10:12] <KE1HA> Well, the Client lis looking for the server now, but getting a Could not read Boot Medium.
[10:14] <bladernr> hrmmm... mine's still installing the server.
[10:14] <KE1HA> The CLient is at least Broadcasting now, PXE-53
[10:17] <KE1HA> Thr other thing that odd is, the LTSP server, cant get to the Internet.
[10:20] <bladernr> you may be using the wrong NICs... maybe.... I don't know.  I noticed, though, that the installation of the LTSP server was trying to use my internal NIC as the primary instead of hte external facing one.
[10:20] <bladernr> so it could be that LTSP dhcp is listening on the wrong network port
[10:20] <bladernr> s/port/device
[10:21] <KE1HA> Yeah, something is a miss, still googling it and playing with Settings. I would thing the Server eth0 needs to be NAT in order to get an IP address.
[10:28] <KE1HA> it's about the get the Big-Delete Key :-)
[10:28] <KE1HA> its about to get :-)
[10:29] <KE1HA> I can't even get the Server to Connect to the Internet normally, this install is hosed/
[10:35] <KE1HA> Guess what, Got it to work.
[10:35] <KE1HA> But the server, still cannot connect to the internet.
[10:40] <KE1HA> Well, I dont know, the LTSP Thin-Clin booted, and and Im logged in there, but neither can get to the Net, so need to get that one sorted.
[10:41] <davmor2> KE1HA: can you ping the server from the client if not then there is an issue with the setup of eth1 on the server side
[10:41] <bladernr> weird, I just installed LTSP and didn't get dhcpd
[10:42] <bladernr> so I'm re-installing just to be sure I didn't muck it up
[10:42] <KE1HA> Thn Client Boots, and I logged into then Thin-Client, it's the server that can't connect outbound.
[10:42] <davmor2> bladernr: 32bit or 64bit?
[10:42] <bladernr> 32bit
[10:42] <KE1HA> 64
[10:43] <KE1HA> So the LTSP Server & Client are workign together, it's the server now working on the Host netowrk now.
[10:43] <davmor2> 64bit needs to have a mod in /etc/lstp/dhcp.conf you need to mod the i386 to amd64bit
[10:43] <davmor2> amd64 sorry
[10:44] <KE1HA> Oh man, I'll just install 32bit :-)
[10:44] <KE1HA> Is that Mod on the Server dhcp.conf ?
[10:44] <bladernr> davmor2:  wasn't that bug fixed last time around?  I went around with stgraber and others when I did 64bit LTSP tests for Lucid
[10:44] <bladernr> KE1HA:  it's that bug I showed you yesterday
[10:44] <davmor2> bladernr: NO
[10:45] <bladernr> davmor2:  sigh...
[10:45] <davmor2> it's a won't fix situation
[10:45] <davmor2> they are looking at it for later versions
[10:46] <bladernr> davmor2:
[10:46] <bladernr> This bug was fixed in the package ltsp - 5.2.1-0ubuntu7
[10:46] <bladernr> ---------------
[10:46] <bladernr> ltsp (5.2.1-0ubuntu7) lucid; urgency=low
[10:46] <bladernr>   * Fix multi-NIC support in d-i plugin. (LP: #376933)
[10:46] <KE1HA> So should we pull the LSTP tests off if we know there gonna fail for 64bit?
[10:46] <bladernr>   * Fix wrong arch on non-i386 in dhcpd.conf (LP: #203954)
[10:46] <davmor2> KE1HA: if you can connect and ping the server then there could be an issue with dhcp
[10:46] <bladernr>   * Add dependency on a plymouth theme so we have a splash.
[10:46] <bladernr>  -- Stephane Graber <stgraber@ubuntu.com> Sat, 10 Apr 2010 20:15:10 -0400
[10:46] <KE1HA> Yeah, Thin Client Boots Properly, and I am able to get to the Thin-Client Desktop, that parts work'en. But on the Server, It can't get conneted to the Net.
[10:47] <bladernr> davmor2:  KE1HA's LTSP is fine as far as LTSP goes.  His second NIC on the LTSP server isn't getting out on the network.. that's a different network segment and should be getting it's IP from VBox... not sure why it's not.
[10:47] <KE1HA> bladernr, Let me go look at the dhcp.conf on the server.
[10:48] <bladernr> KE1HA:  what if you open a terminal, do a ifconfig and see if your outbout NIC even has an IP
[10:48] <bladernr> if not, try running dhclient on it
[10:48] <KE1HA> Ok, let me check that.
[10:49] <bladernr> KE1HA:  you MAY have to manually assign an address for that outbound nic too, since LTSP is running dhcp as well
[10:50] <KE1HA> http://imagebin.org/110037
[10:52] <KE1HA> what's that command to run dhcp  .. is it jsut dhcpclient ?
[10:52] <bladernr> that looks right... IIRC 192.168 is the external VBox LAN and 10. is the LTSP LAN (it's been a while)
[10:52] <bladernr> to run the server or the client?
[10:52] <KE1HA> client
[10:52] <KE1HA> to gat an IP
[10:52] <KE1HA> get
[10:52] <bladernr> server is dhclient ethX
[10:53] <davmor2> KE1HA, bladernr:  That might be the issue the default setup is for eth1 in and eth0 out.  So unless it's magically reset itself that might be the issue
[10:53] <bladernr> davmor2:  yeah, that's what I was thinking... my last one was trying to use the wrong NIC as well during install.
[10:53] <davmor2> so eth1 is the link to client and eth0 is interweb
[10:54] <davmor2> KE1HA: what is the ip address assigned to the client
[10:54] <KE1HA> I shut it off, let me fire it back up again.
[10:57] <KE1HA> http://imagebin.org/110038
[10:57] <KE1HA> Looks like 10.0.2.15
[10:58] <KE1HA> But, when i'm on the Thin Client Log in screen, Im seeing a 192.168.0.20 IP address
[10:59] <KE1HA> eth2 has the same IP address 10.0.2.15
[10:59] <davmor2> KE1HA: That's the issue then you also shouldn't have 2 eth ports on the client that might be confusing networkmanager
[11:00] <bladernr> on mine, eth0 is 10.X and eth1 is 192.168.x and it worked first time
[11:00] <KE1HA> let me shutdown the Thin Client and server  BRB
[11:01] <davmor2> bladernr: Yeah but it's still eth 0 and 1 KE1HA is eht 1 and 2 which might be the issue
[11:01] <KE1HA> I dont understand that either
[11:01] <bladernr> davmor2:  doh
[11:01] <davmor2> KE1HA: try running the client with only one nic
[11:02] <KE1HA> The Client only has one NIC already
[11:02] <KE1HA> The Server has two Nocs
[11:02] <KE1HA> NICS
[11:02] <davmor2> KE1HA: not according to the image you just posted
[11:03] <KE1HA> :-)  I know I dont understand it either.
[11:03] <KE1HA> On VBOX, LSTP-Server, Adaptor one, set to NAT, Adaptor 2 set to Internal.
[11:04] <KE1HA> On the Client, Adaptor-1, Internal.
[11:04] <KE1HA> And that's it.
[11:05] <KE1HA> Now, on my main Box, when I do ifconfig, I get eth0 and eth1
[11:05] <KE1HA> Let me try annother VM, ans Iv'e got like 10 of them.
[11:07] <KE1HA> On a standard UB-ALT-AMD64 Install, I get eth0 also.
[11:07] <KE1HA> In VM that is.
[11:07] <KE1HA> But the IP address is 10.0.2.15
[11:08] <KE1HA> and that's the only VM running, Im gonna fire up another one and see if it gets 10.0.2.16
[11:09] <davmor2> KE1HA: yeap don't worry about numbers too much the nat can set it up as whatever it wants.
[11:10] <KE1HA> Ok, EDUB-DESKTOP, etho, but oddly enough, it too says 10.0.2.15
[11:10] <KE1HA> ping localhost
[11:10] <KE1HA> maybe that will work
[11:11] <KE1HA> Just kidding.
[11:11] <KE1HA> I dont know what's causing it.
[11:11] <KE1HA> and whywould Two seperate VM's have the Same IP address ?
[11:11] <KE1HA> while running concurrently?
[11:13] <KE1HA> And both those VM's can get to the Internet no problem.
[11:16] <KE1HA> I dont really need 63bit, 32 is fine, but would like to figure out why this version ins't work'en
[11:16] <KE1HA> oosp dont need 64bit
[11:22] <KE1HA> bladernr, I'm going to install a 32-Bit version and see what the results are.
[11:23] <bladernr> I just did 32bit and it worked out of the box... so hopefully you'll see the same thing.
[11:24] <KE1HA> Yeah, if it does, then we'll know somethign up wiht 64-bit.
[11:24] <KE1HA> It only takes a couple minutes to install.
[11:25] <bladernr> I'm almost done installing 64bit too... have it up in a few
[11:28] <KE1HA> Ok, durting you server install, did you Pick eth0 for the metwrk adaptor ?
[11:28] <KE1HA> network
[11:28] <KE1HA> Anyway, I just picked eth0 as the main NIC>
[11:31] <bladernr> I pick the first one that's listed
[11:33] <KE1HA> That's what I picked, eth0
[11:48] <KE1HA> Man, KDE can be painfull :-)
[11:50] <ara> KE1HA, ssshhh (we know that but we don't say out loud :D)
[11:50] <KE1HA> :-) sri
[12:12] <KE1HA> bladernr, same problem with 32-Bit, only difference is, I have eth0 and eth1 on this build, but still can't get to the Ine.
[12:19] <bladernr> do both addresses have IPs?
[12:20] <bladernr> errr... do both NICs have IPs...
[12:20] <bladernr> ping -I ethX www.canonical.com
[12:21] <KE1HA> Let me look BRB
[12:22] <KE1HA> eth0 = 10.0.2.15    eth1 192.168.0.20
[12:23] <KE1HA> I can't ping out to anything,. I trided sudo dhclient -r then start it gaing, it gets the IP's but can't get out.
[12:23] <bladernr> Really, just don't worry about it.  It's a VM/VBox issue, not a LTSP issue.
[12:24] <KE1HA> It's annoying :-)
[12:24] <bladernr> if you can boot the thinclient and log in on that, you're good.
[12:24] <bladernr> heh, yeah, I imagine so
[12:24] <KE1HA> Yeah, the Thin Client boots.
[12:24] <KE1HA> That worked on 64-Bit also.
[12:26] <KE1HA> Glad the Docs do say, then browse to the Inet, i'd really be tweaked then :-)
[12:26] <KE1HA> Don't say
[12:39] <KE1HA> bladernr, so should I Pass on both the 32 / 64 bit versin os the LTSP? they both booted fine once I have VBOX setup, only issue I can see is the outbound Internet.
[12:39] <bladernr> yes.  The network issue is yours.... I've installed both 32 and 64bit and do not have internet issues (using VBox too)
[12:40] <bladernr> so it's something with your VM config or something...
[12:40] <bladernr> but it's not a greater issue with LTSP
[12:40] <KE1HA> Yeah, I need to figure that one out.
[12:40] <KE1HA> Ok, I'll put pass on them then.
[12:46] <KE1HA> ara, the rescue bug 613510 is on the KDE ALT cd's too.
[12:46] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 613510 in rescue (Ubuntu) "Rescue mode shows more partitions that those that are available as root partitions (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/613510
[12:48] <ara> KE1HA, OK, I have seen that cjwatson already triaged the bug
[12:49] <KE1HA> yes, I saw that just then, well at least they know.
[12:59] <KE1HA> bladernr, where is the Kubuntu-Netbook ISO hiding at  ?
[14:01] <davmor2> KE1HA: http://cdimages.ubuntu.com/kubuntu-netbook/lucid/daily-live/
[14:05] <KE1HA> I found it davmor2 TNX .
[17:20] <KE1HA> Everyone at the Pub already ? :-)
[17:26] <davmor2> no
[17:28] <KE1HA> Are you at the sprint as well davmor2 ?
[17:28] <davmor2> yeap
[17:29] <KE1HA> Where abouts are all the meetings taking place ? I lived in York for about 8yrs.
[17:31] <davmor2> Oxford for this one
[17:35] <KE1HA> rr
[17:57] <KE1HA> davmor2, do you all use a works for scheduling, like work-week 32,33,34 etc or is it straight calendar events ?
[17:57] <KE1HA> Use a work week schedule .. .. ..
[17:58] <davmor2> KE1HA: we just make it up as we go along ;)
[17:58] <KE1HA> :-)  ok
[18:16] <slangasek> hi, is there anyone around today who can help with wubi, migration-assistant testing for the 10.04.1 point release?
[18:19] <ara> slangasek, some of us are sprinting this week in Oxford, with little access to hardware
[18:19] <slangasek> so I've gathered :(
[18:20] <ara> slangasek, I just finished the iSCSI test and it failed, maybe cjwatson can have a look to the logs to see if he quickly spots the error
[18:20] <ara> slangasek, bug 619353
[18:24] <ara> KE1HA, do you have Windows in any of your machines?
[18:25] <KE1HA> Only on an i386 D400 Laptop (XP), but I could always install Vista, I have a copy of that & key somwhere.
[18:25] <ara> KE1HA, the XP would work
[18:25] <KE1HA> What ya need?
[18:25] <ara> KE1HA, can you help us testing Wubi?
[18:26] <KE1HA> Ohhh, that's scary :-)
[18:26] <ara> KE1HA, those are the testcases that haven't been covered
[18:26] <ara> KE1HA, why?
[18:26] <KE1HA> Does that mess with the MBR at all, in any way ?
[18:26] <KE1HA> In not, sure I can hav a go at it.
[18:26] <KE1HA> If Not.
[18:26] <ara> KE1HA, here you have a nice explanation on how that work:
[18:26] <ara> http://blog.cyphermox.net/2010/06/wubi-installing-ubuntu-inside-windows.html
[18:27] <KE1HA> Ok.
[18:27] <ara> slangasek, can you answer that question? ^
[18:27] <slangasek> I think wubi does install to the MBR
[18:27] <slangasek> it just doesn't repartition
[18:28] <KE1HA> It looks ok, which CD has Wubi ? I've not tested it before.
[18:28] <ara> KE1HA, the desktop CDs
[18:28] <KE1HA> If this Nukes my MBR Im flying to Oxfora ara :-)
[18:29] <KE1HA> Ok, i'll have a look at it.
[18:30] <KE1HA> I can only do i386-desktop is that ok ?
[18:30] <ara> no it just installs inside windows it doesn't touch your mbr as such lucids is fine
[18:30] <ara> that was davmor2 who answer
[18:31] <ara> he's the wubi expert
[18:31] <ara> KE1HA, and, yes, it is better than nothing, thanks
[18:31] <KE1HA> Ok, no worries. Am burning a CD now.
[18:41] <ara> slangasek, KE1HA is also installing Wubi
[18:41] <ara> KE1HA, we're trying to see if bug 613288 reproduces
[18:44] <KE1HA> Its really easy actually.
[18:45] <KE1HA> It's doing it's thing. no troubles so far.
[18:50] <KE1HA> Just FYI, all those users on the bug report have Vista or Later Windows Boxes, they all have that dreaded UIC ot UAC whatever it is that malfunctions everything.  I disabled it forever on Vista when I used it, else ran into stuff like that all the time.
[18:51] <ara> KE1HA, OK, thanks for that info
[18:51] <ara> slangasek, ^
[18:52] <slangasek> ah, thanks
[18:52] <cyphermox> slangasek, do you still need help with wubi testing?
[18:52] <slangasek> cyphermox: yes, definitely - see iso.qa.ubuntu.com and take your pick :)
[18:53] <KE1HA> Yep, same exact error, on XP
[18:53] <cyphermox> ok; it's going to be an hour or so though, time to install Windows on metal
[18:53] <cyphermox> slangasek, ara; any particular test cases / bugs would require re-testing or so? so I know what version to install :)
[18:54] <KE1HA> My error was "Cannot Download metalink and therefore ISO"
[18:54] <cyphermox> KE1HA, I take it you did your tests on XP
[18:54] <KE1HA> It jsut failed.
[18:54] <marjo> cyphermox: yes; please http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/result/4424/11
[18:54] <KE1HA> But yes, the test was on i386 XP laptop.
[18:55] <ara> KE1HA, can you comment the bug and upload your logs?
[18:55] <ara> (also mark the test as failed)
[18:55] <KE1HA> Ok, need to find this log.
[18:56] <slangasek> KE1HA: if you have more time to help test, once you've uploaded your logs you could grab the stand-alone wubi.exe from http://releases.ubuntu.com/lucid/wubi.exe and see if the problem is reproducible that way
[18:57] <KE1HA> Sure, I've done all the others I can do I think.
[18:57] <KE1HA> It actually gave me 2x error loges.
[18:58] <KE1HA> On for Rev 189 and one fer 190, but that's the first time I've ever installed it, or tried to install.
[18:59] <slangasek> oh
[18:59] <slangasek> I don't understand that
[18:59] <slangasek> KE1HA: any chance you could join #ubuntu-release and talk to cjwatson about this?
[19:00] <KE1HA> Sure,, can I download the Wubi.exe directly to the XP Box?
[19:00] <slangasek> yes
[19:00] <KE1HA> Ok, ubuntu release .. on my way.
[19:41] <cyphermox> KE1HA, after installing wubi from the CD, did you get errors reading NTFS partitions when trying to boot to grub?
[19:42] <KE1HA> I've not made it paset the DL yet.
[19:42] <KE1HA> past*
[19:42] <cyphermox> you didn't try the first case, wdi-001? that one is using the files from a CD
[19:43] <KE1HA> Mine failed on the metalink file, that's cuz the release tree isn't populated yet, but I dont see why this is fetching another ISO, when it has one.
[19:44] <cyphermox> right
[19:44] <KE1HA> They wanted me to Install-test it, so that's what I was doing.
[19:45] <KE1HA> I guess I could have Live-Booted as in case 001
[19:45] <KE1HA> Im new too Wubi - 1st today :-)
[19:48] <cyphermox> KE1HA, the cd has a copy of wubi in its root... that's what I'm trying to test on Vista right now; but once it reboots, grub doesn't like the fact that the partitions are ntfs
[19:50] <KE1HA> yeah, that makes since, as NFS / EXT and NTFS dont play well together.
[19:50] <cyphermox> nevermind, maybe that's not exactly what is happening
[19:51] <KE1HA> I dont understand the Boot-loader. Why woudl anyone need Wubi, if they had a LiveCD already?
[19:51] <KE1HA> I thought the idea behind Wubi is like a big EXE fer WinDoze
[19:57] <cyphermox> KE1HA, yes, but some people might not be ready to use the liveCD to repartition and install, it's just a convenient way to install ubuntu alongside windows
[19:59] <ara> marjo, I will stay connected, in case some help is needed testing
[19:59] <marjo> ara: thx!
[20:00] <KE1HA> Hmm. right ok, from like USB or Downloaded file or something. I've seen allot of these Netbook guys / girls in the ubuntu support channel saying they have no CD on their Box etc.
[20:05] <KE1HA> cyphermox, other than this issue, I did not see any real show stoppers from an install standpoint. I could not test Cloud  or the language regressions / migrations though.
[20:06] <cyphermox> KE1HA, it's my fault, I was testing the maverick image *facepalms*
[20:06] <KE1HA> Well, I would not have known abt this one if ara had not said something to me abt it.
[20:07] <KE1HA> and if the Intel i855 chipset problem was resolved, I would not have this box on Windows either :-0
[20:09] <KE1HA> cyphermox, no worries though, there's still 4 hours left in "today" so, it will happen Im sure.
[20:09] <cyphermox> KE1HA, what i855 problem?
[20:09] <KE1HA> The Black Screen at & after boot.
[20:10] <cyphermox> ah, nice. do you have a bug number for that one, in case issues may be similar to the ones on i915 and others?
[20:10] <KE1HA> have to try an nomodset to i915, noacpi, etc etc, none works on the mid-850's series chips.
[20:11] <KE1HA> Here's the Work-Around: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Bugs/Lucidi8xxFreezes
[20:11] <KE1HA> but dont always work, and there's loads of people with that issue, or similar to it.
[20:12] <cyphermox> that somehow doesn't sound like the same bug
[20:13] <KE1HA> I can't even get to the Install screen, after initial boot from the CD, jsut locks up.
[20:13] <cyphermox> ok
[20:14] <KE1HA> To be honest I dont know the real root cause, Im just pegging it this based on all the others having the same issue on i855's
[20:15] <KE1HA> Have a grep on Launchpad Answers go Black Screen, or Boot lock ups, there's loads of them.
[20:17] <KE1HA> Not to say there all the same problem, but most complain the same way, "It Workes on 904/910 but then xyz on 10.04" all the same symptoms get explained.
[20:18] <KE1HA> One thing I've not tried is the Maverick Kernel, I may do that on a LiveCD ans see how it pans out.
[20:19] <davmor2> KE1HA: no that doesn't help test this issue at all :)
[20:20] <KE1HA> Hmm, Im outta ideas on that one.
[20:21] <KE1HA> But this is the controller I have: Intel Corporation 82845G/GL and it goes nutty bonkers at bott / install.
[20:21] <KE1HA> Boot*
[20:21] <KE1HA> I take that back, I've got the 855M
[20:22] <KE1HA> yeah, it's th 82855GM/GME
[21:01] <njin> hello to all
[21:02] <njin> haw can i have a textual output of ubiquity during install ?
[21:03] <davmor2> njin: you can't really but there is a log you can read through after
[21:03] <njin> davmor2: thanks
[21:04] <ara> njin, during the installation is under /var/log/syslog
[21:04] <ara> njin, once installed, it will be stored under /var/log/installer/syslog
[21:05] <njin> ara: then switching to console i can have it
[21:06] <davmor2> njin: no, you would need to run something like watch on syslog
[21:06] <njin> ara: nano
[21:07] <njin> davmor2: nano /var/log/syslog
[21:08] <njin> ara, davmor2: thanks
[21:27] <cyphermox> oh, the irony. running into bugs and issues with Windows when trying to install Ubuntu >.<
[22:17] <KE1HA> Looks like all is well again ara, back to desktop apps :-)
[22:34] <ara> KE1HA, great
[22:48] <ara> KE1HA, you're doing an awesome work, thanks a lot  :)
[22:50] <KE1HA> No worries, learning allot, especially abt installs :-)
[23:04]  * charlie-tca thinks we teach with experience
[23:05] <charlie-tca> The more you do, the more you learn
[23:26] <njin> hello, i'm looking for a volounterous with two HD that can confirm bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-auto/+bug/601344 reproducible in every images.
[23:39] <njin> on ubuntu20100816.1 bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/619495 (jokey don't start on installed OS) mdsum verified by zsync and CD verified by k3b.
[23:44] <charlie-tca> The jockey bug was reported in Maverick already, also.
[23:45] <charlie-tca> njin: I will burn an image and verify the two hd bug
[23:46] <njin> charlie-tca: big!!!
[23:46] <charlie-tca> well, as soon as I figure out which image he used
[23:47] <charlie-tca> what is?
[23:47] <njin> charlie-tca: if i remeber jockey's bug was in xubuntu
[23:47] <charlie-tca> still a duplicate
[23:48] <njin> charlie-tca: i've tested only ubuntu 64
[23:48] <charlie-tca> It doesn't matter. the bug is still a duplicate if it showed up in maverick already
[23:49] <njin> charlie-tca: then i mark as duplicate.
[23:49] <charlie-tca> yes, and add the tag "lucid"
[23:50] <njin> charlie-tca: sorry, but the bug in xubuntu was in the liveCd, here is in the installed OS, in the CD works
[23:50] <charlie-tca> the 2 hd bug needs to be noted in release notes.
[23:51] <njin> how?
[23:51] <charlie-tca> okay
[23:51] <charlie-tca> Just tell the release manager
[23:52] <charlie-tca> All bugs found in testing are looked at before the release. If the image was already released, it can be fixed for 10.04.2
[23:53] <njin> probably is fixed in maverick
[23:53] <charlie-tca> I haven't seen the announcement yet, so it should be okay to get it added
[23:54] <njin> i need to verify a dup of another report of ara with three disk
[23:55] <njin> but i'll do tomorrow, now it's too late for me. see you tomorrow, good noght
[23:55] <njin> *night
[23:56] <charlie-tca> good night