=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
nigelb | Rhonda: *hugs* for getting packages.ubuntu.com working again :) | 08:18 |
---|---|---|
dupondje | and now merges.ubuntu.com :) | 08:22 |
Rhonda | nigelb: Well, thank elmo I would expect, or cjwatson who should at least know who did the final tweakings. | 08:47 |
nigelb | Rhonda: yes, but somone had to keep poking them :) | 08:48 |
Rhonda | I guess I have to continue with that to make the screenshots appear anyway, people seem to like the idea, strangely enough. ;) | 08:49 |
nigelb | heh | 08:49 |
Rhonda | busy at froscon btw. Anyone of the usual suspects here? | 08:50 |
Rhonda | There is some ubuntu and kubuntu booth at least. | 08:50 |
nigelb | Berlin? dholbach maybe. | 08:54 |
nigelb | Oh, Bonn | 08:54 |
vish | jcastro: maye we can mention stack exchange in the installer itself! | 09:23 |
vish | argH! | 09:23 |
vish | wrong channel! | 09:23 |
and471 | can anyone point me to some documentation on how to go about removing a package from main | 09:37 |
and471 | actually, removing from universe | 09:37 |
tumbleweed | and471: write a bug requesting it's removal, and showing it has no rdepends. Link to the appropriate debian bug if it was removed there too. Subscribe ubuntu-archive. | 09:46 |
and471 | ok thanks | 09:47 |
bilalakhtar | hi tumbleweed, for that keurocalc merge the other day do you think it was good from my part (after ignoring the forwarding to debian problem) ? | 10:00 |
and471 | tumbleweed, thanks for the merge yesterday :) | 10:02 |
tumbleweed | bilalakhtar: I remember no issues :) and471: np | 10:07 |
bilalakhtar | tumbleweed: ah, ok. I am extra-careful about such stuff nowadays, since every thing counts once you get closer towards MOTU :) | 10:08 |
vish | bilalakhtar: looks like the gps drive is looking for someone to maintain it.. what we have in archive is pretty old outdated package, interested? ;) | 10:18 |
bilalakhtar | vish: is it orphaned? ME TO THE RESque! | 10:18 |
bilalakhtar | vish: I wanted to maintain it for a long time, but the maintainer didn't announce it to be orphaned | 10:19 |
vish | bilalakhtar: its in the comments in one of the reports you pointed out. | 10:19 |
vish | bilalakhtar: not orphaned, but seems maintainer is MIA. | 10:19 |
bilalakhtar | vish: MIA? | 10:19 |
and471 | missing in action | 10:19 |
vish | which might be orphaned , but not official | 10:19 |
vish | bilalakhtar: ^ | 10:20 |
bilalakhtar | ok | 10:20 |
bilalakhtar | vish: it isn't orphaned, but I will put up an RFA | 10:20 |
* bilalakhtar fires up reportbug | 10:21 | |
bilalakhtar | it appears that I will need to contact the maintainer | 10:22 |
* bilalakhtar joins #debian-qa on irc.oftc.net | 10:22 | |
and471 | bilalakhtar, what are the advantages of being a contributing dev? | 10:25 |
bilalakhtar | and471: the only advantage is that you get ubuntu membership the easy way! | 10:25 |
and471 | bilalakhtar, vish has just recommended that I become one, but since you have just become one I thought I'd ask you :) | 10:25 |
and471 | hehe | 10:25 |
bilalakhtar | and471: How many packages have you uploaded? | 10:25 |
* and471 starts counting | 10:25 | |
bilalakhtar | and471: did you ever work on merges/syncs? | 10:25 |
vish | and471: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BilalAkhtar/ContributingDeveloperApplication this was app | 10:26 |
vish | i | 10:26 |
and471 | bilalakhtar, no not really, mostly fixes for 100 papercuts | 10:26 |
vish | and471: what about Software center? ;) | 10:26 |
and471 | vish, oh yeah and that :) | 10:26 |
* bilalakhtar looks at and471 's lp profile | 10:26 | |
bilalakhtar | and471: what did you do about s-c ? | 10:28 |
vish | and471: this is the wiki : https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopers#Ubuntu%20Contributing%20Developers just thought you might qualify.. [but i'm not dmb though] ;p | 10:28 |
and471 | bilalakhtar, I have just been heavily involved in its development | 10:28 |
bilalakhtar | and471: ah, that would help | 10:28 |
and471 | vish, no problem, I am glad you recommended it or I never even would have thought about it | 10:29 |
vish | np.. :) | 10:29 |
and471 | vish, bilalakhtar, I think the problem is I haven't done any sync/merges | 10:30 |
and471 | (to be honest I couldn't define either) | 10:30 |
and471 | maybe if I can get a few of them under my belt, I could apply | 10:30 |
bilalakhtar_ | yes I am here, and471 and vish | 10:31 |
and471 | bilalakhtar_, clone... | 10:31 |
bilalakhtar_ | actually I got disconnected, so had to reconnect | 10:31 |
bilalakhtar_ | let bilalakhtar go down, then I will change nick | 10:31 |
bilalakhtar_ | and471: I was going to tell you, merging/syncing from Debian is the most common task in development (ubuntu). It might be a bit difficult to become UUC without it, but I cannot say anything, for sure | 10:32 |
=== bilalakhtar_ is now known as bilalakhtar | ||
and471 | no you are right, I did to do some of them | 10:33 |
* bilalakhtar has to switch WiFi networks now, will be back in a few seconds | 10:34 | |
ari-tczew | and471: do you want to become as UUC? | 10:34 |
bilalakhtar | ari-tczew: yes | 10:34 |
and471 | ari-tczew, that is a question I need to ask :) | 10:34 |
ari-tczew | and471: could I see your LP and wiki page? | 10:35 |
and471 | ari-tczew, vish recommended it and I just wanted to first find a little bit more about it | 10:35 |
bilalakhtar | and471: BTW, I never uploaded a package outside Maverick | 10:35 |
and471 | ari-tczew, sure launchpad.net/~and471 | 10:35 |
bilalakhtar | and471: which means that I got involved in development too early | 10:35 |
bilalakhtar | and471: its your choice, but I would recommend you to apply once you have crossed 10 uploads | 10:36 |
and471 | bilalakhtar, cool thanks for the advice :) | 10:36 |
vish | ari-tczew: and471 has been working on Software center for a very very long time, ever since it was released , and i have seen him do work on a few other packages too.. so i just suggested it might be something he could try for :) | 10:36 |
bilalakhtar | and471: BTW, do you remember me poking you up for porting Wasiliana to python? | 10:37 |
and471 | vish, I was working on it before you were called vish... | 10:37 |
vish | and471: ;p | 10:37 |
bilalakhtar | hehe | 10:37 |
and471 | bilalakhtar, nope, but I probably have a bad memory | 10:37 |
* bilalakhtar switches networks | 10:37 | |
and471 | bilalakhtar, wasiliana is not really being worked on at the moment, I am trying to get kazam ready for a release and that is being a bit slow as well | 10:38 |
ari-tczew | and471, vish, bilalakhtar: there is no stricte bareer like "minimum 10 packages uploaded", just minimum work for Ubuntu. I didn't remember your work (personally). | 10:39 |
bilalakhtar | ari-tczew: I just recommended it to him | 10:39 |
bilalakhtar | ari-tczew: I know that there is no strict barrier | 10:39 |
and471 | ari-tczew, yeah, but I think I need to do some syncs/merges before I apply | 10:39 |
bilalakhtar | BTW, coolbhavi got rejected from MOTU even after uploading 900+ packages! | 10:39 |
ari-tczew | and471: you have to create a wiki page if you want apply as UUC | 10:40 |
bilalakhtar | ari-tczew: he is just thinking about applying | 10:40 |
ari-tczew | and471, bilalakhtar: even so, it's require to get some comments from sponsors | 10:40 |
bilalakhtar | ari-tczew: hey, how do you people get so many packages uploaded! (joking) Did you hack or something? You have so many uploads! | 10:40 |
bilalakhtar | ari-tczew: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BilalAkhtar/ContributingDeveloperApplication was my application | 10:41 |
ari-tczew | bilalakhtar: just working | 10:41 |
* persia notes that nobody is ever rejected from MOTU: applications are just deferred | 10:42 | |
ari-tczew | and471: I propose to fix security issues or even testing proposed patches :) | 10:42 |
vish | persia: hey! :) | 10:42 |
and471 | bilalakhtar, did you have to ask people to comment on it, or does it just happend? | 10:42 |
and471 | ari-tczew, cool thanks | 10:42 |
bilalakhtar | persia: ah ok if I used the wrong word, but what happened with coolbhavi's application and the e-mail votes? | 10:42 |
bilalakhtar | and471: you need to manually poke the people to comment | 10:42 |
and471 | ok | 10:43 |
bilalakhtar | and471: I had poked 6 people, but only 3 commented | 10:43 |
and471 | vish, well hopefully with those two bugs I just managed, I can get two syncs | 10:43 |
persia | bilalakhtar, In process. Results will be annonced later. | 10:43 |
and471 | if debian are not slow about it again | 10:43 |
bilalakhtar | one thing I don't like about Debian is that NMUs get sponsored very slowly | 10:44 |
ari-tczew | bilalakhtar: bhavi's case is sad, but he could include people's changes to debian/changelog and everything will be allright | 10:44 |
bilalakhtar | ari-tczew: that was a very small error | 10:44 |
bilalakhtar | ari-tczew: well, that taught all of us a lesson | 10:45 |
bilalakhtar | always thank people for patches in debian/changelog | 10:45 |
ari-tczew | bilalakhtar: I don't think so, because there are people which were affected by his problem | 10:45 |
bilalakhtar | ari-tczew: will you attend th e | 10:47 |
and471 | anyway thanks for all of your guys' advice/help/jokes :) | 10:47 |
bilalakhtar | (continuation) next meeting | 10:47 |
bilalakhtar | ? | 10:47 |
and471 | I'm gonna go now | 10:47 |
and471 | see ya | 10:47 |
bilalakhtar | bye and471 | 10:47 |
ari-tczew | bilalakhtar: I don't understand | 10:47 |
bilalakhtar | ari-tczew: will you attend the next meeting? | 10:47 |
ari-tczew | bilalakhtar: as you can see on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DeveloperMembershipBoard/Agenda, yes | 10:48 |
ari-tczew | and there is a question of free time, because 17th Aug I've been working in hours UTC 8:00 - 16:00 +1 hours for come back to home, so I was too late on channel. | 10:50 |
cjwatson | Rhonda: I did tell you who it was - Brad Marshall | 12:05 |
Rhonda | Oh, then I missed that part, thanks. | 13:16 |
AnAnt | Hello | 13:31 |
ari-tczew | helo AnAnt | 13:32 |
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
ari-tczew | tumbleweed: could you review again bug 583280 ? | 13:42 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 583280 in mtd-utils (Ubuntu Lucid) "nandwrite failing with IGEPv2 (OMAP 3430)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/583280 | 13:42 |
ari-tczew | now sponsors step is first before SRU team review | 13:44 |
tumbleweed | ari-tczew: so, do you think that debdiff is ready for SRU? I see two small issues | 13:46 |
ari-tczew | tumbleweed: so I have to look into debdiff :P | 13:47 |
ari-tczew | tumbleweed: 1: run update-maintainer and 2: include lp: # in debian/changelog | 13:48 |
ari-tczew | no subscribed ubuntu-sponsors in bug :P | 13:49 |
tumbleweed | ari-tczew: yes to all of those. but two issues in this line: mtd-utils (20090606-1ubuntu1) lucid; urgency=low | 13:49 |
ari-tczew | tumbleweed: s/lucid/lucid-proposed | 13:50 |
tumbleweed | yup | 13:50 |
ari-tczew | s/20090606-1ubuntu1/20090606-1ubuntu0.1 | 13:51 |
ari-tczew | tumbleweed: ^^ | 13:51 |
tumbleweed | almost there | 13:51 |
tumbleweed | hint: | 13:51 |
tumbleweed | mtd-utils | 20090606-1 | karmic/universe | source, amd64, i386 | 13:51 |
tumbleweed | mtd-utils | 20090606-1 | lucid/universe | source, amd64, i386 | 13:51 |
tumbleweed | ari-tczew: point 4: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure | 13:52 |
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
ari-tczew | tumbleweed: and? | 13:54 |
tumbleweed | karmic and lucid have the same version number. 20090606-1ubuntu0.1 in lucid would not allow us to SRU karmic | 13:55 |
ari-tczew | tumbleweed: why not? | 13:56 |
tumbleweed | well, what version number would we use to SRU to kramic? | 13:57 |
ari-tczew | tumbleweed: 20090606-1ubuntu-9.10 | 13:58 |
tumbleweed | we try to never have two hyphens in a version, it confuses some things | 13:59 |
tumbleweed | anyway, if you follow th elink from point 4, you'll get here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdatePreparation#Update%20the%20packaging | 13:59 |
tumbleweed | which has this recommended scheme: | 13:59 |
tumbleweed | 2.0-2 in two releases 2.0-2ubuntu0.5.04.1 and 2.0-2ubuntu0.5.10.1 | 13:59 |
ari-tczew | tumbleweed: so he must repair his debdiff | 14:00 |
tumbleweed | you know everything that needs to be done now, feel free to propose a debdiff | 14:01 |
ari-tczew | I'll do that, but later | 14:08 |
ari-tczew | tumbleweed: do you mean attach a fixed debdiff or suggest him to fix something? | 14:08 |
tumbleweed | ari-tczew: attach one | 14:09 |
ari-tczew | tumbleweed: sign by me? | 14:10 |
tumbleweed | yes, nothing wrong with that if you are the one preparing it. It's normal to give credit to the patch author in the message. | 14:11 |
ari-tczew | tumbleweed: I'll add in debian/changelog a line: [ Daniel J Blueman ] and below the change | 14:13 |
tumbleweed | that works too | 14:14 |
ari-tczew | bilalakhtar: that just Bhavani has got the problem with including other people in debian/changelog ^^ | 14:14 |
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
michas | Hi, not sure if I am absolutely on-topic, but do you know why the sun-java6-* packages where moved from multiverse to partner? Was there a large licence change or something? | 15:47 |
sebner | michas: I guess because in theory openjdk is now equivalent to sun-java | 15:48 |
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
sladen | michas: being superceded | 15:50 |
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
SpamapS | Anyone know how to get requestsync to see that this package was uploaded to unstable: http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gearman-interface.html ? | 16:59 |
SpamapS | 0.13.2-1 is severely broken | 16:59 |
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
geser | SpamapS: once LP or rmadison list it | 17:09 |
geser | SpamapS: but you still have the option to file the sync request by hand, just copy the needed infomation into the bug | 17:09 |
SpamapS | geser: whats rmadison ? | 17:18 |
nigelb | SpamapS: its a tool (in devscripts) | 17:18 |
nigelb | !info rmadison | 17:18 |
ubottu | Package rmadison does not exist in lucid | 17:18 |
nigelb | that's strange | 17:19 |
nigelb | oh wait, it isn't a package | 17:19 |
geser | nigelb: like you said, a tool in devscripts | 17:19 |
geser | !info devscripts | 17:19 |
ubottu | devscripts (source: devscripts): scripts to make the life of a Debian Package maintainer easier. In component main, is optional. Version 2.10.61ubuntu5 (lucid), package size 578 kB, installed size 1724 kB | 17:19 |
geser | :) | 17:19 |
SpamapS | ah Ok | 17:20 |
SpamapS | so how does rmadison update itself? | 17:20 |
nigelb | SpamapS: It queries the servers. | 17:20 |
nigelb | geser: yeah, I was getting there :) | 17:20 |
SpamapS | ok, I see that.. and it still has 0.13.2-1 .. odd | 17:21 |
geser | it's only a frontend for a CGI page on the Debian servers which gets its information directly from a database | 17:21 |
SpamapS | yeah I see that | 17:22 |
SpamapS | weird that PTS has the new version, but madison does not | 17:22 |
SpamapS | I'm probably just being too eager. the upload was only 24 hours ago | 17:22 |
geser | which should usually be enough | 17:22 |
SpamapS | Projectb snapshot from Thu, 19 Aug 2010 15:18:06 +0000 | 17:24 |
SpamapS | not quite. ;) | 17:24 |
SpamapS | Not sure how often that snapshot is updated.. but 2 days seems a long time. ;) | 17:25 |
geser | dinstall runs nowadays 4 times a day in Debian IIRC | 17:26 |
SpamapS | well I won't worry about it | 17:27 |
SpamapS | I should be outside in the sun anyway, not syncing packages | 17:27 |
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
=== Philip6 is now known as Philip5 | ||
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
simar | shadeslayer: heya !!! hows going on | 20:42 |
shadeslayer | oh hey | 20:42 |
shadeslayer | :D | 20:42 |
shadeslayer | simar: long time no see :D | 20:42 |
simar | shadeslayer: ya :D | 20:42 |
simar | shadeslayer: I'm happy that you remember me.. | 20:43 |
shadeslayer | :) | 20:43 |
simar | shadeslayer: I want to ask something, why doesn't the moto mentoring program respond?? | 20:43 |
shadeslayer | because its not active as of now? | 20:44 |
simar | shadeslayer: :-(( | 20:44 |
simar | shadeslayer: oh, by the way hows you application for moto going on.. | 20:44 |
shadeslayer | yeah i know | 20:44 |
shadeslayer | simar: ah.. right now im looking at some coding, not alot of packaging for universe | 20:45 |
shadeslayer | but im involved with neon.. which takes up most of my packaging time :P | 20:45 |
shadeslayer | one sec | 20:47 |
simar | simar: neon?? | 20:47 |
iulian | simar: The acronym is MOTU btw, not moto. | 20:48 |
* iulian goes back to his cave. | 20:48 | |
simar | iulian: oh, my mistake. | 20:51 |
simar | iulian: , typo | 20:51 |
shadeslayer | simar: project neon | 20:53 |
shadeslayer | basically aimed at providing nightly KDE builds | 20:53 |
simar | shadeslayer: ok | 20:53 |
simar | shadeslayer: now i can package better and i'm still a beginner to packaging. | 20:55 |
shadeslayer | good to hear :D | 20:55 |
shadeslayer | so basically its bug fixing time in maverick, you might want to look at the topic ;) | 20:55 |
simar | shadeslayer: I hope you can guide me some better starting point (than FTBFS that i started at) for easy packaging.. | 20:56 |
simar | shadeslayer: I'm interested in bug fixing... let me see | 20:56 |
shadeslayer | well.. your a bit late, else i could have told you how to do sync's and merge's as well | 20:57 |
simar | shadeslayer: :-(( | 20:57 |
simar | shadeslayer: I can't see much interesting in topic.. what you were pointing at?? | 20:59 |
shadeslayer | same FTBFS :P | 20:59 |
shadeslayer | and look at bugs.launchpad.net | 20:59 |
shadeslayer | do we have a tag for packaging bugs? | 20:59 |
=== sladen changed the topic of #ubuntu-motu to: Archive: Open | Maverick Feature Freeze in effect - Fix bugs | Want to get involved with the MOTU? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Contributing | Sponsor queue: http://is.gd/2y76G | http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/NBS | http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/bugs/rcbugs/ | latest rebuild failures: http://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/ubuntu_ftbfs.cgi | ||
simar | shadeslayer: ya FTBFS has taken a lot of my energy.. | 21:05 |
shadeslayer | whee | 21:06 |
shadeslayer | archive open again | 21:06 |
simar | shadeslayer: see this I have submitted some patch work https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kball/+bug/611867 | 21:06 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 611867 in kball (Ubuntu) "FTBFS in maverick. Error: 'mkdir' was not declared in this scope" [Undecided,Fix released] | 21:06 |
simar | shadeslayer: I think i should start at 100 papercuts, may be.. | 21:06 |
shadeslayer | simar: good start | 21:07 |
simar | shadeslayer: thanks for encouraging :-)) | 21:07 |
simar | shadeslayer: what about 100 papercuts | 21:08 |
shadeslayer | simar: id say go for them ;) | 21:08 |
shadeslayer | also look at operation cleansweep | 21:08 |
simar | shadeslayer: ya I have heard both of them, I think i'll try to fit myself somewhere .. | 21:09 |
simar | shadeslayer: thanks for you advice | 21:09 |
simar | though | 21:09 |
simar | :)) | 21:09 |
shadeslayer | simar: contact nigelb for operation cleansweep | 21:09 |
* shadeslayer points nigelb to new minion | 21:09 | |
simar | shadeslayer: ya i will, first i will read some wiki, though i have read some.. :)) | 21:10 |
shadeslayer | yeah operation cleansweep has a pretty small wiki | 21:10 |
shadeslayer | just see if the patch is still applicable > use it with packaging > attach debdiff and ask a MOTU to review bug if its in universe | 21:11 |
simar | ya, if we skip knowledge base part of it. ..lol | 21:11 |
simar | shadeslayer: thanks for overview .. | 21:12 |
shadeslayer | :) | 21:12 |
simar | shadeslayer: ok, i think i should start right away .. once again thanks n good luck in coding .. :-)) | 21:18 |
shadeslayer | hehe :D | 21:18 |
shadeslayer | my patch is almost 90 % ready | 21:18 |
simar | shadeslayer: good .. keep it going, c ya later | 21:20 |
shadeslayer | cya | 21:20 |
sistpoty | can anyone unsubscribe sponsors from bug #619709 please, as I seem to have lost the ability to do so during the merge of the sponsors teams. | 22:22 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 619709 in javacc (Ubuntu) "Please sync javacc 5.0-4 (main) from debian unstable (main)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/619709 | 22:23 |
tumbleweed | sistpoty: done | 22:23 |
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
sistpoty | thanks tumbleweed | 22:24 |
BlackZ | sistpoty: if you ACK a sync request, you should set the bug's status to "Confirmed" | 22:31 |
sistpoty | BlackZ: ah, thanks for the hint | 22:32 |
* RainCT wonders if anyone is familiar with libtextcat | 23:05 | |
RainCT | particularly on why libtextcat-data-utf8 won't let met install libtextcat0 | 23:07 |
sistpoty | RainCT: libtextcat0 depends on libtextcat-data, which conflicts with libtextcat-data-utf8 | 23:09 |
RainCT | sistpoty: yup, so why would that be? | 23:10 |
sistpoty | RainCT: no idea... I'm not familiar with libtextcat :P | 23:11 |
RainCT | It looks like libtextcat-data-utf8 is there only for OpenOffice.org, which from what I've read ships a bundled copy of libtextcat0 | 23:11 |
sistpoty | RainCT: my best guess is that both data files are meant to be interchangeable, just the mechanism was chosen wrongly | 23:12 |
* RainCT tries what happens adding a Provides: libtextcat-data to -utf8 | 23:13 | |
sistpoty | RainCT: I doubt it will work, since libtextcat-data is non-virtual... otoh, provides in conjunction with conflicts is so special, that I always forget the details. probably if you change the conflicts to libtextcat-data it might even work | 23:14 |
RainCT | "openoffice.org-common conflicts with libtextcat-data libtextcat-data-utf8 provides libtextcat-data and is to be installed. dpkg: error" | 23:14 |
RainCT | damn you dpkg :P | 23:15 |
sistpoty | haha | 23:15 |
sistpoty | RainCT: I think the self-conflicts of libtextcat-data-utf8 should be adjusted to libtextcat-data, maybe that makes dpkg happier :) | 23:16 |
RainCT | OK, got it installed, giving libtextcat0 an alternative dependency on -utf8, and removing "Breaks: libtextdata0" from -utf8. Let's see if it works | 23:18 |
sistpoty | RainCT: I think the traditional approach is to have both data packages provide one virtual package (both conflicting to it) and have the library depend on bestfitrealpackage | virtual-package (since that adds the least burden on apts dependency resolver) | 23:24 |
sistpoty | Lutin: python-evas ftbfs (0.3.1+svn20091203-1), however 0.5.0+r49677-1 builds fine. Should we go for a sync? (I'm totally unfamiliar with the zhone stack) | 23:27 |
RainCT | uhm, half of the sentences in langclass/ShortTexts/catalan.txt are in Spanish o.O | 23:30 |
sistpoty | saludos! :) | 23:31 |
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
RainCT | sistpoty: ok, the library works fine with the UTF-8 data, so I see no reasons why they should conflict | 23:41 |
sistpoty | RainCT: probably it was just a not working approach to state that either data or data-utf8 would be needed | 23:42 |
Lutin | sistpoty: oh yes, totally. that's my fault here - forgot that python-* was in ubuntu. you might want to sync python-ecore, -edje, -edbus and -elementary too | 23:43 |
sistpoty | Lutin: thanks! | 23:44 |
RainCT | oh, packages.ubuntu.com is being updated again? | 23:45 |
sistpoty | RainCT: hm? works for me (though I still don't get screenshots *g*) | 23:50 |
RainCT | last time I checked it didn't have maverick | 23:50 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!