smallfoot- | plz package php-gtk | 00:16 |
---|---|---|
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
smallfoot- | plz package php-gtk | 01:11 |
kklimonda | smallfoot-: the project is all but dead and with the upcoming gtk+3 release and all the gobject introspection work that goes along with it I fear that uploading the current version right now wouldn't make sense. Not to mention that there is no one who is interested in packaging it. | 01:16 |
smallfoot- | kklimonda, but i need php-gtk for running gui of phoronix-test-suite | 01:20 |
kklimonda | yes, and that is probably the only realworld application that uses php-gtk bindings. You will have to ask phoronix guys how to install php=gtk (or check its homepage). There may also be some 3rd party ppa with it - have you ckecked? | 01:22 |
smallfoot- | there is a ppa but only for karmic, not lucid, maverick | 01:30 |
smallfoot- | and i dont want use third-party ppa or install from source, i want it "just work" | 01:30 |
=== arjun_ is now known as arjun | ||
=== arjun_ is now known as arjun | ||
=== arjun___ is now known as arjun | ||
=== arjun__ is now known as arjun | ||
=== arjun_ is now known as arjun | ||
=== arjun_ is now known as arjun | ||
=== arjun_ is now known as arjun | ||
=== arjun_ is now known as arjun | ||
=== arjun__ is now known as arjun | ||
=== arjun_ is now known as arjun | ||
Muscovy | Hi, I'm the uploader of http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/day-of-ubuntu . Would anyone mind helping me solve the lintian error? I haven't been able to fix this one without creating more. | 06:39 |
kklimonda | Muscovy: what errors do you get when you remove NMU? | 06:40 |
Muscovy | It's been a while since I tried, so I'll test. I _think_ it mentions it needs NMU. | 06:41 |
ebroder | Muscovy: What version of Lintian are you using? It should know not to whine about NMUs if the maintainer is set to ubuntu-devel-discuss | 06:42 |
Muscovy | I think I had set it to the development team as the owner. | 06:43 |
Muscovy | Also, is there an easy way to download it all from revu? I can't seem to find my local copy anymore. | 06:44 |
ebroder | dget <.dsc file> | 06:44 |
Muscovy | Thanks, that's handy. | 06:46 |
ebroder | (It only works if all the files are in the same, err, URL directory, or whatever) | 06:46 |
ebroder | (But that's usually the case) | 06:46 |
Muscovy | So is it ubuntu-devel-discuss with no address? | 06:46 |
ebroder | Muscovy: Sorry, no - what you've got should be good. Just remove the NMU note from the changelog | 06:46 |
Muscovy | Ok. | 06:47 |
=== arjun_ is now known as arjun | ||
Muscovy | Ok, it's uploading. It'll take a few minutes. | 06:52 |
Muscovy | Here we are, ebroder: http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/revu1-incoming/day-of-ubuntu-1008220757/lintian | 06:58 |
* ebroder squints | 06:58 | |
Muscovy | Two complaints: 3.0 format and no README. | 06:58 |
ebroder | I have a theory | 06:59 |
ebroder | Muscovy: Are you doing development on a Lucid or Maverick machine/VM/chroot/whatever? | 06:59 |
Muscovy | Lucid machine. | 06:59 |
ebroder | And do you get those warnings when you run Lintian on your package? | 06:59 |
Muscovy | Nope. | 06:59 |
Muscovy | I get "W: day-of-ubuntu source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.8.3 (current is 3.8.4)". | 07:00 |
ebroder | Ok. In that case, I blame revu for being a really old machine | 07:00 |
ebroder | (You should bump the standards version, though) | 07:00 |
Muscovy | I tried that before, actually. | 07:00 |
Muscovy | Revu said 3.8.4 didn't exist. | 07:00 |
ebroder | Yeah. That's because Revu is running Hardy, and it didn't exist then :) | 07:01 |
Muscovy | Ah. Why isn't 3.8.4 a lucid update though? | 07:01 |
Muscovy | 3.8.3 is still the lucid default. | 07:01 |
ebroder | Packages update their standards version when they get around to it. Do you mean that 3.8.3 is what you get from dh_make or something? | 07:02 |
Muscovy | Yes. | 07:02 |
ebroder | Yeah. It probably just wasn't updated when Lucid was syncing from Debian | 07:02 |
kklimonda | the current policy is 3.9.1 so you should update your package to it | 07:06 |
kklimonda | (by update I mean actually checking if there were changes affecting your package - there is a nice upgrading-checklist.txt.gz in debian-policy package) | 07:07 |
ebroder | Speaking of which, it's *really* silly that REVU is still running on a Hardy sparc box. What are the current hardware requirements for the site (disk, etc)? Surely someone else has some - any - spare capacity... | 07:09 |
micahg | ebroder: can't upgrade w/sparc to lucid... | 07:10 |
=== arjun_ is now known as arjun | ||
ebroder | micahg: Right. The sparc bit is the bit that's silly | 07:10 |
=== Lutin is now known as Guest87666 | ||
Muscovy | There, it's up: http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/day-of-ubuntu | 07:18 |
=== lucidfox_ is now known as lucidfox | ||
=== hannesw__ is now known as hannesw | ||
wgrant | ebroder: We can move it elswhere. But there's no really compelling reason to do so yet. | 07:51 |
wgrant | But it was discussed last week. | 07:51 |
ebroder | wgrant: "Having an ancient version of Lintian that misfires errors at you" doesn't count as a compelling reason? :) | 07:51 |
Muscovy | I agree with that. | 07:52 |
Muscovy | And it can't use debian 3.0 format. | 07:52 |
wgrant | Muscovy: That just requires backporting a new lintian, which we've historically done often. | 07:56 |
wgrant | Er, ebroder: ^^ | 07:56 |
wgrant | Muscovy: And a dpkg backport was in progress last week. | 07:57 |
Muscovy | Ah, progress. :D | 07:57 |
ebroder | I guess that works then | 07:57 |
wgrant | It just requires somebody to care for REVU. | 07:57 |
wgrant | I can move it onto different hardware if required, but others need to maintain the service. | 07:57 |
Muscovy | Well, if I become a MOTU, I'll certain help if possible. | 07:58 |
Muscovy | Revu feels under-utilized. | 07:58 |
ebroder | wgrant: Hmm...if you're looking for MOTU volunteers, I might be interested, but I'll have to get back to you once I think about what I'm getting myself into | 07:58 |
wgrant | Well, there are others in control of the service. | 08:01 |
wgrant | I'm not looking for anyone. | 08:01 |
wgrant | I was mainly responding to the questioning of whether there was other hardware. | 08:01 |
* micahg prepares an upload to feed the hungry builders | 08:04 | |
wgrant | ia64 and sparc are going to be eternally hungry soon :( | 08:05 |
=== arjun__ is now known as arjun | ||
micahg | wgrant: nah, we just have to start backporting and SRUing more :) | 08:05 |
wgrant | Heh. | 08:05 |
micahg | should .pc be in the VCS for soruce format 3? | 08:14 |
micahg | wgrant: ^^ | 08:29 |
Zhenech | hyperair, ping | 08:34 |
tumbleweed | micahg: I wish it wasn't but the auto-imported packages tend to be stored patches-applied, yes | 08:38 |
micahg | tumbleweed: that's what I'm wondering, the Debian version has it, so I should include in Ubuntu version too? | 08:39 |
tumbleweed | "the debian version" ? | 08:39 |
micahg | lp:debian/sid/foo | 08:39 |
tumbleweed | aah | 08:39 |
maco | is there any reason why it would be a bad idea for /etc/bashrc to by default have "export QUILT_PATCHES='debian/patches'" to save *headdesks* later for us all on new installs? | 08:40 |
micahg | maco: because not all packages work like that | 08:40 |
maco | dang | 08:40 |
tumbleweed | maco: time to store your .quiltrc in $vcs and write a new install personal-customisation script? | 08:41 |
maco | i dont have a .quiltrc...i just put that in my .bashrc and then setup VMs and forget to do it there too and then get confused | 08:42 |
maco | i was asking seb128 the other day how he got gnome-control-center to compile when quilt push -a fails... and he reminded me | 08:43 |
bilalakhtar | maco: how was it? | 08:44 |
maco | bilalakhtar: i forgot to set QUILT_PATCHES | 08:44 |
bilalakhtar | ah ok | 08:44 |
AnAnt | Hello | 08:45 |
micahg | tumbleweed: when merging with VCS, does every merge change need to be a new commit w/source format 3 or all in one? | 08:45 |
tumbleweed | micahg: that's up to personal style, I tend to do them in one commit (or a few commits in a branch, merged into one commit in the UDD tree) | 08:46 |
tumbleweed | (if I'm understanding you correctly( | 08:46 |
micahg | tumbleweed: yeah, the changes should all be present though | 08:47 |
micahg | just patches if necessary aren't applied | 08:47 |
micahg | in ,oc | 08:47 |
micahg | or rather in the code.. | 08:48 |
tumbleweed | people like patches-applied because you can see the final source in the tree, and $vcs blame it appropriately. I don't like it, because it makes reviewing harder and obfuscates things (often resulting in auto-generated anti-patches, when people are new to quilt) | 08:49 |
micahg | tumbleweed: also, should I put the Ubuntu VCS info or leave the Debian VCS info | 08:53 |
tumbleweed | only if we maintain our own packaging of this in a VCS somewhere | 08:54 |
micahg | tumbleweed: not UDD? | 08:54 |
tumbleweed | well, all packages have UDD branches | 08:54 |
micahg | tumbleweed: no, most packages have UDD branches | 08:55 |
tumbleweed | and few packages are actually maintained in them (you don't see new versions being prepared in them) | 08:55 |
tumbleweed | basically, I'd say leave the debian vcs info | 08:55 |
micahg | tumbleweed: k | 08:55 |
hyperair | Zhenech: pong | 08:55 |
Zhenech | hyperair, talked with enrico at froscon yesterday | 08:56 |
hyperair | oh cool | 08:56 |
Zhenech | hyperair, the safest way to get plugins 0.19 in is not to ship any of the new plugins :) | 08:56 |
hyperair | eh? | 08:56 |
hyperair | oh, into squeeze? | 08:57 |
Zhenech | yepp | 08:57 |
hyperair | okay. | 08:57 |
Zhenech | dunno how the release team thinks about new binaries | 08:57 |
Zhenech | will ask later today | 08:57 |
hyperair | okay, thanks. | 08:57 |
bilalakhtar | hi hyperair seeing you after so long | 08:57 |
Zhenech | have a patch on my hd to do this already :) | 08:57 |
hyperair | bilalakhtar: it's only been a week =) | 08:58 |
hyperair | Zhenech: a patch to drop the new binaries? | 08:58 |
Zhenech | yepp | 08:58 |
hyperair | i see. | 08:58 |
hyperair | that's nice | 08:58 |
hyperair | speaking of which i need to get round to adding --enable/disable flags for each plugin, instead of those with weird dependencies. | 08:59 |
Zhenech | yepp! :) | 08:59 |
hyperair | wait, you mean the patch does all that? | 08:59 |
Zhenech | no | 09:00 |
Zhenech | my patch just drops ctpl build dep | 09:00 |
Zhenech | and drops the packages from debian/control | 09:00 |
Zhenech | so they are built but never installed | 09:00 |
bilalakhtar | tumbleweed: As for bug #621065 , seb128 told me that we can go ahead without FFe since its a GNOME package | 09:02 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 621065 in sound-juicer (Ubuntu) "Update to 2.31.6" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/621065 | 09:02 |
bilalakhtar | tumbleweed: am I right ? | 09:04 |
tumbleweed | sounds fair enough | 09:05 |
bilalakhtar | tumbleweed: GNOME packages can be updated until version 2.32 rolls out | 09:06 |
bilalakhtar | tumbleweed: Its not fair to freeze on an unstable release like 2.31.* and not upgrade to the stable ones | 09:06 |
tumbleweed | yeah, sounds good | 09:07 |
bilalakhtar | tumbleweed: And, we are uploading this version even though the package is maintained in Debian, because of the fact that Debian will straightaway upload 2.32 while Ubuntu needs to go in a more progressive way (seb128) | 09:10 |
micahg | bilalakhtar: some of the debian maintainers will upload the 2.31.x releases to experimental | 09:11 |
=== _martin is now known as m4rtin | ||
hyperair | Zhenech: i see. that sounds feasible. | 09:21 |
hyperair | Zhenech: could you pastebin the patch somewhere so i can apply it? =) | 09:21 |
=== bilalakhtar is now known as bilalakhtar_ | ||
bilalakhtar | Thanks tumbleweed for the upload! | 09:33 |
tumbleweed | bilalakhtar: any time | 09:58 |
micahg | tumbleweed: with MoM down, UDD is a lifeaver | 10:01 |
micahg | *lifesaver | 10:01 |
tumbleweed | micahg: are you using my merge tool? | 10:01 |
micahg | tumbleweed: no | 10:02 |
tumbleweed | micahg: :) | 10:02 |
micahg | tumbleweed: sorry, this was same upstream revision so it was an easy merge :) | 10:03 |
=== Guest87666 is now known as Lutin | ||
Zhenech | hyperair, i also could just commit myself :) | 10:55 |
Zhenech | hyperair, but I mail debian-release first :) | 10:56 |
shadeslayer | hi, how do i request a sync from debian experimental? | 11:09 |
shadeslayer | i tried : requestsync foo -d experimental -e | 11:10 |
shadeslayer | doesnt work :/ | 11:10 |
geser | error? | 11:16 |
shadeslayer | E: 'kmymoney' doesn't appear to exist in Debian 'experimental' | 11:16 |
shadeslayer | http://packages.debian.org/experimental/kmymoney | 11:17 |
ajmitch | shadeslayer: possibly because it was uploaded in the last 24h? | 11:17 |
geser | it was uploaded today | 11:17 |
shadeslayer | oh | 11:17 |
shadeslayer | yes i know | 11:17 |
shadeslayer | so it doesnt pick it up | 11:17 |
shadeslayer | ddidnt know that ^ :P | 11:17 |
ajmitch | no, it grabs the info from a mirror that's regularly synced (daily iirc) | 11:17 |
shadeslayer | hmm | 11:17 |
geser | requestsync only knows what's in LP or reported by rmadison | 11:17 |
shadeslayer | rmadison ? | 11:18 |
shadeslayer | debian mirror ? | 11:18 |
geser | a script from devscripts | 11:18 |
shadeslayer | oic | 11:18 |
geser | http://qa.debian.org/madison.php?package=kmymoney | 11:20 |
geser | hmm, the snapshot seems a little bit out-of-date | 11:20 |
micahg | geser: yeah, I"m having that with phpmyadmin also | 11:22 |
bilalakhtar | tumbleweed: Hello! Would you recommend me to apply for MOTU now or wait? | 11:26 |
tumbleweed | bilalakhtar: drop me a mail with a list of spnsorships I've done for you, and I'll be able to give you an answer (we need a script for this, I tried writing one but can't get the data I need out of lp's API) | 12:02 |
persia | tumbleweed, You can parse the data out of the -changes mail | 12:27 |
tumbleweed | persia: yeah, I suppose that's the best way | 12:28 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
AnAnt | persia: hey, long time ! | 13:01 |
Rhonda | Is the last change in bug #619650 someone just looking for easy karma? :) | 16:30 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 619650 in wesnoth (Ubuntu) "Please remove wesnoth from maverick" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/619650 | 16:30 |
nigelb | Rhonda: Possible. I don't see him/her in bug squad. | 16:33 |
nigelb | (the entire thing is not needed I think. Generally bug squad is encouraged to stay away from workflow bugs) | 16:34 |
anoteng | which package am I missing when I get the following error during source package building? | 17:14 |
anoteng | dpkg-source: error: source package format `3.0' is not supported (Perl module Dpkg::Source::Package::V3 is required) | 17:14 |
Bachstelze | could an SRU person look at #622319 ? | 17:17 |
tumbleweed | Bachstelze: subscribe ubuntu-sponsors. It also needs a maverick fix before the SRU can be approved | 17:18 |
Flannel | anoteng: dpkg-dev | 17:18 |
Bachstelze | tumbleweed: ok, done | 17:19 |
tumbleweed | Bachstelze: you also want to Nominate for Lucid | 17:20 |
anoteng | Flannel: I thought so too, but it's allready installed... | 17:20 |
Flannel | anoteng: What version of Ubuntu are you running? | 17:21 |
Bachstelze | tumbleweed: also Maverick? | 17:21 |
tumbleweed | Bachstelze: not necessary | 17:21 |
anoteng | 10.04 | 17:21 |
geser | what the content of debian/source/format? | 17:24 |
ari-tczew | Rhonda: I think that it's pedantic. | 17:30 |
=== bhargav is now known as kronos | ||
ari-tczew | nigelb: so upgrade dspam must be gigantic procedure | 17:36 |
nigelb | ari-tczew: I dunno. | 17:37 |
nigelb | I just looked at the debian ML | 17:37 |
ari-tczew | nigelb: IIRC they are upgrading 3 years this package | 17:37 |
nigelb | ari-tczew: well, it is in experimental | 17:37 |
nigelb | I think it broke some stuff | 17:37 |
ari-tczew | nigelb: some time ago I tried to do this, but it's true, it's very hard to do. | 17:39 |
nigelb | ari-tczew: In that case, we cannot blame them. Everyone's a volunteer. | 17:40 |
nigelb | I myself was away from cleansweep for some time until I could finally schedule my work around it now. | 17:40 |
ari-tczew | yea | 17:41 |
funkeyDuder | I am having trouble building a package. When I change the source I get an error about failing some test (using debuild). Anyone have any thoughts as to what might be going on? | 20:12 |
bilalakhtar | tumbleweed: I mailed you the list of bugs | 20:23 |
=== menesis1 is now known as menesis | ||
andrew_708476 | IS there anyone that doesn't mind lending a hand with Ubuntu | 21:10 |
ari-tczew | funkeyDuder: give a log - use pastebin | 21:10 |
ari-tczew | dupondje: ping | 21:11 |
dupondje | pong :) | 21:12 |
ari-tczew | dupondje: are you still interesed contribute to Ubuntu? | 21:13 |
dupondje | sure sure :) but bit less time atm :) | 21:13 |
ari-tczew | dupondje: we have to finish patching asterisk, do you remember? | 21:14 |
ari-tczew | it's still waiting on my hard disk :) | 21:14 |
dupondje | what was not correct with it again ? :) | 21:18 |
ari-tczew | dupondje: please tab me if you are writing to me. | 21:25 |
ari-tczew | it will easy for me | 21:25 |
ari-tczew | dupondje: you have to complete file CVE-2007-6170.dpatch | 21:27 |
ubottu | SQL injection vulnerability in the Call Detail Record Postgres logging engine (cdr_pgsql) in Asterisk 1.4.x before 1.4.15, 1.2.x before 1.2.25, B.x before B.2.3.4, and C.x before C.1.0-beta6 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via (1) ANI and (2) DNIS arguments. (http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2007-6170) | 21:27 |
ari-tczew | there is no DEP3 tags | 21:27 |
ari-tczew | there are no * | 21:27 |
AnAnt | Hello | 22:02 |
ari-tczew | hello AnAnt | 22:16 |
micahg | is conflicts appropriate when if one package is installed, the other will not work? | 22:23 |
micahg | in that they provide similar functionality | 22:23 |
debfx | micahg: yes, if they really don't work when the other is installed | 22:30 |
micahg | debfx: k, filing the bug in Debian... | 22:30 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!