[00:49] <lahwran> is updown goofing up again?
[09:18] <duanedesign> bug 622916
[09:18] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 622916 in ubuntuone-client "Ubuntu One cannot sync files with more than 100(?) characters in filename (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/622916
[09:20] <duanedesign> havent been able  to reproduce this. However my other computer is down at the moment. Can anyone confirm or negate this bug?
[15:17] <rodrigo_> alecu, nessita: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~rodrigo-moya/ubuntuone-client/app-name-in-signals/+merge/33528 and https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~rodrigo-moya/ubuntuone-client/use-sso-in-u1-prefs/+merge/33523 please
[15:19] <nessita> rodrigo_, alecu: https://code.launchpad.net/~nataliabidart/ubuntu-sso-client/add-debug/+merge/33529
[17:00] <apachelogger> nessita, verterok: any objections against uploading my gsoc KDE stuff to universe for maverick?
[17:00] <apachelogger> (that is if it gets a FFe)
[17:05] <verterok> apachelogger: don't know what's the gsoc KDE stuff :)
[17:06] <apachelogger> verterok: simple KDE GUI stuff and a Qt implementation of authentication
[17:06] <verterok> apachelogger: also, I think you should ask rodrigo/Chipaca about it
[17:06] <verterok> ah, nice :)
[17:06] <apachelogger> Chipaca: ^^
[17:08] <apachelogger> verterok: http://apachelog.wordpress.com/2010/08/19/ubuntu-one-the-kde-way/
[17:08] <Chipaca> apachelogger: let's talk with rodrigo and alecu (nessita would be best but she's leaving to uni right now) in about an hour?
[17:08] <apachelogger> okidoki
[17:09] <dobey> apachelogger: that's all in a separate package, and not intended to go in the upstream project?
[17:10] <apachelogger> dobey: well, it could go upstream if someone wishes to mess with the buildsystem (or convert to cmake) etc.
[17:11] <dobey> or if you wrote it in python :)
[17:14]  * apachelogger had enough experiences with pykde to not use it unless absolutely necessary :P
[17:20] <dobey> heh
[17:21] <dobey> well using automake is reasonable, but having much of the same code duplicated in python and c++ is kind of annoying
[17:23] <dobey> i guess the kde applet and such in that blog post are separate from the authentication pieces though?
[17:27] <apachelogger> dobey: yes
[17:27] <apachelogger> also the authentication is not that much code
[17:28] <apachelogger> which is the reason I redid it
[17:30] <dobey> not that much code? 7K lines of python seems liek a lot to me :)
[17:31] <dobey> only 400 of which are comments :)
[17:32] <dobey> or well, top level comments
[17:32] <dobey> so license header, basically
[17:33] <apachelogger> dobey: a lot of that is UI code in bzr
[17:34] <apachelogger> Qt version (that is headless currently) is 749 sloc
[17:34] <apachelogger> and that includes plugins for KWallet and GNOME Keyring and cmake and some python foo
[17:35] <apachelogger> additional 50 for cmake macros
[19:29] <lalejand> verterok : Hi, I think one day you checked some problem I had and you told me to raise up my U1 synced files limit. I made a fresh ubuntu install, so I have to do it again. Can you tell me what it was ? (I hope I'm not talking to the wrong person ;) )
[19:30] <verterok> lalejand: hi
[19:31] <verterok> lalejand: raise the synced files limit?
[19:31] <verterok> lalejand: can't remember anything about that :/
[19:31] <verterok> lalejand: maybe the inotify watches limit?
[19:31] <lalejand> verterok : ahm it wan't you then
[19:32] <lalejand> verterok : it was like the max number of watched files
[19:32] <lalejand> some thing li
[19:32] <lalejand> ke that
[19:33] <verterok> lalejand: if it was the max number of watched files, it's the inotify limits
[19:34] <verterok> lalejand: add fs.inotify.max_user_watches=<big enough integer> to /etc/sysctl.conf
[19:34] <verterok> lalejand: something like: fs.inotify.max_user_watches=32768 should be more than enough
[19:38] <lalejand> verterok : thanks !!! BTW why is there a limit ?
[19:40] <verterok> lalejand: it's the default kernel value
[21:33] <dnielsen> ajmitch, I hate to be that guy, but have you had a change to look at the mono bindings for libubuntuone, the issue where they changed from 10k to 3k between two releases
[21:33] <ajmitch> no, but I'll try & look at it asap today & then poke the right person about it :)
[21:34] <dnielsen> thank you, finally I might be able to build banshee community extensions again
[21:34] <ajmitch> yeah, it's sort of important for getting the updated b-c-e in ubuntu
[21:35] <ajmitch> do you have a bug # for it?
[21:38] <irssita> alecu: hey there!
[21:38] <irssita> alecu: look, a bug report! https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-sso-client/+bug/623604
[21:38] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 623604 in ubuntu-sso-client "credentials dictionary has different key for token_name (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New]
[21:38] <alecu> irssita, thanks
[21:39] <alecu> irssita, what is affected by that bug?
[21:39] <irssita> alecu: syncdaemon, I'm trying to fic the critical bug from today
[21:40] <irssita> alecu: and it wasn't working till I noticed that the problem was that
[21:40] <irssita> I mean, the original problem was the signals signature, whihc I fixed, but then I kept having failures and was this bug
[21:41] <alecu> irssita, ok. What is syncdaemon expecting? app_name or token_name?
[21:41] <alecu> irssita, and also, how is it using it?
[22:00] <irssita> alecu: it was being used in a log, so no worries
[22:01] <irssita> alecu: I just modified the log to not to use it :-)
[22:01] <alecu> irssita, oohhhhh
[22:01] <irssita> alecu: but I think we should fix it, to some uniifed key name
[22:01] <alecu> irssita, ok, great.
[22:01] <irssita> :-)
[22:04] <irssita> rodrigo_, alecu, Chipaca : ubuntu-sso-client 0.99.2 was released!
[22:04] <Chipaca> irssita: oh noes!
[22:04] <Chipaca> irssita: tomorrow is the last day for ui changes, did i mention that?
[22:04] <Chipaca> :)
[22:05] <alecu> irssita, yes, yay!
[22:05] <alecu> irssita, and with a beautiful bugfixes log, and a lot of bugs automatically marked as fixed!
[22:05] <alecu> yay for --fixes!
[22:06]  * ajmitch looks at what is new
[22:09] <rodrigo_> irssita, yeah, saw all the bugs fixed automatically!! :D
[22:12] <irssita> I'm gone!
[22:12] <irssita> see ya at the pyar meeting
[22:12] <alecu> irssita, silla!
[22:33] <dobey> alecu: huh?
[22:33] <dobey> alecu: yay for me you mean ;)
[22:33] <alecu> yay for --dobey!
[22:34] <dobey> alecu: i fixed tarmac to get the list of bugs fixed in a branch when merging, and automatically mark them fix committed after a successful commit :)
[22:34] <alecu> dobey, cool! I had little bits of info regarding that, but not the full fact.
[22:35] <alecu> dobey, yay for you then!
[22:35] <dobey> unless you're talking about the automatic resolution from LP for bugs mentioned in debian/changelog on new package uploads
[22:35] <dobey> which i did not do, and has been there all along
[22:36] <dobey> hmm
[22:37] <dobey> though it appears that has not happened
[22:37] <dobey> (the tarmac bug fixing bit, on the branches i presume you're talking about)
[22:45] <dobey> later all
[22:53] <duffydack> sorry, Ive never used U1 music store before.  Where do my purchases go, on my hd.  In the ubuntuone folder?
[22:53] <beuno> duffydack, ~/.ubuntuone/Purchased from Ubuntu One/
[22:54] <duffydack> beuno, in a hidden folder?  that doesnt sound right
[22:54] <beuno> duffydack, well, if rhythmbox listens to that folder
[22:55] <duffydack> ah.. ok
[22:55] <beuno> so you should see them magically appear
[22:55] <beuno> we would of likes to put int in ~/Music
[22:55] <beuno> but there where a *lot* of problems in doing that
[22:55] <duffydack> Its still saying queued after approx 10mins..
[22:56] <duffydack> its just 1 song.
[22:56] <beuno> duffydack, whats does u1sdtool -s say?
[22:56] <beuno> is it connected, etc?
[22:56] <beuno> duffydack, also, take a peak in the web ui
[22:56] <beuno> see if it's already available there
[22:56] <duffydack> its connected I just run the u1 tool...
[22:57] <duffydack> I have stuff set to sync, its connected and sync`d.
[22:57] <duffydack> yup, its there via web
[22:58] <beuno> duffydack, and syncdaemon is idle?
[22:59] <duffydack> yup.   ryhymbox still says queued.. and the gui tool says all fine...no song on my hd tho
[22:59] <duffydack> rhythmbox*
[22:59]  * beuno summons mattgriffin 
[23:04] <duffydack> http://paste.ubuntu.com/483120/     see
[23:10] <mattgriffin> beuno: what's up?
[23:11] <mattgriffin> duffydack: when you go to https://one.ubuntu.com/files do you see a folder called something like Purchased Music near the top?
[23:14] <mattgriffin> duffydack: i'll be right back
[23:16] <duffydack> yes
[23:16] <duffydack> the song is there.
[23:16] <duffydack> been there a while.
[23:17] <verterok> duffydack: is the song in ~/.ubuntuone/Purchased\ from\ Ubuntu\ One/ ?
[23:18] <duffydack> nope
[23:19] <verterok> duffydack: looks like syncdaemon wasn't notified yet
[23:19] <lahwran> so when is pycon? I hear there will be a windows ubu one client written there
[23:19] <verterok> fwiw, syncdaemon == sync client
[23:20] <duffydack> Rhythmbox still says queuing.  No files in that folder and its there on the web
[23:20] <duffydack> U1 is connected,  A ok
[23:23] <verterok> lahwran: there was a sprint in the last pycon
[23:23] <lahwran> LAST pycon?
[23:24] <mattgriffin> duffydack: i'm back
[23:25] <duffydack> I`m downloading the track from the U1 web
[23:27] <verterok> duffydack: what version of ubuntuone-client do you have installed? run: apt-cache policy ubuntuone-client
[23:27] <verterok> lahwran: yes
[23:28] <duffydack> verterok, latest
[23:28] <duffydack> well, in lucid
[23:28] <duffydack> Installed: 1.2.2-0ubuntu2
[23:28] <verterok> ok
[23:28] <duffydack> I got no issues using U1.
[23:28] <duffydack> just the music side Ive never used before, till now
[23:29] <verterok> duffydack: I think it's just that the notitication never reached the client
[23:29] <verterok> duffydack: do you restarted the client since the song appeared in the web ui? (don't restart the client ;-))
[23:30] <duffydack> I never restart the client.
[23:30] <verterok> duffydack: ok, cool, try this: u1sdtool --refresh $HOME/.ubuntuone/Purchased\ from\ Ubuntu\ One/
[23:30] <duffydack> I set it once during setup and dont touch it again..
[23:30] <lahwran> verterok, ok, do you happen to have a linky?
[23:31] <verterok> lahwran: to the windows client?
[23:31] <lahwran> or do I have to go all the way to the button on my kicker to launch my webbrowser and google it?
[23:31] <duffydack> now u1tool says working on metadata
[23:31] <duffydack> yeah, its coming down now
[23:31] <duffydack> shouldnt have to, but anyways.
[23:32] <duffydack> Rhythmbox is saying the same now,
[23:32] <verterok> lahwran: it wasn't finished, but there is a branch somewhere with some refactor of the client in order start the windows specific bits, e.g: replace inotify with...something else(?)
[23:32] <lahwran> :( oh
[23:32] <lahwran> that's rather boring
[23:33] <verterok> lahwran: but there are a few developers activly working on getting the windows client ready
[23:33] <lahwran> ah good. who are they/do they post a timeframe?
[23:34] <lahwran> oh, and how painful would it be to use the ubuntu client on another POSIX OS?
[23:34] <verterok> lahwran: don't think there is a timeframe yet, let me see if I can find a wiki page or something
[23:34] <verterok> lahwran: if it supports inotify and dbus, it should be ok
[23:35] <lahwran> ...which are not kernel level, so I could get them running on say mac os x or freebsd easy, right?
[23:35] <verterok> lahwran: for the case of OS X/BSD, it will require to have support fsevents, i think?
[23:35] <verterok> lahwran: the client will need to support that, which isn't there yet, but all contributions are more than welcome ;)
[23:36] <lahwran> is the client in C[++]?
[23:36] <lahwran> or maybe python?
[23:36] <verterok> lahwran: python
[23:36] <lahwran> :D YAY!
[23:37] <lahwran> this means I can work on it easily, python is my strong point
[23:37] <verterok> lahwran: the windows port is being worked on by mandel and vds, they will know what's the current status better than I do
[23:38] <verterok> lahwran: also, they are working on this branch from pycon which split all the platform specific bits into separate modules, so it's easy to add platforma specific stuff, like fsevent support
[23:46] <verterok> duffydack: probably a server side issue, the client should get a notification of the new file
[23:47] <verterok> ok, I'm off. later!
[23:47]  * verterok waves
[23:47] <duffydack> ciao
[23:47] <duffydack> thanks