[00:02] <weather15_> I can't seem to figure out what's going on here: cannot stat `debian/NEWS.Debian': No such file or directory
[00:02] <weather15_> The file exists
[00:26] <weather15_> What do you do when bzr says there has been no changes to commit but there has been?
[02:22] <thumper> weather15_: try and work out why it thinks that
[02:22] <thumper> weather15_: it could be that you are editing an ignored file
[02:22] <thumper> or a file in an ignored directory
[02:22] <thumper> personally when I get that it is normally because I'm not editing what I think I'm editing
[04:34] <ChogyDan> I would like to report an dead build
[04:34] <ChogyDan> https://launchpad.net/~chogydan/+archive/ppa/+build/1925853
[04:37] <spm> ChogyDan: huh. that is impressive. ta.
[04:39] <ChogyDan> hehe, yeah, it has just been stuck there.  Anyway, nm, I sent a message to lamont via launchpad, to prove my identity
[04:49] <lamont> wgrant: http://paste.ubuntu.com/483233/ <-- wtf?
[04:50] <spm> special.
[05:13] <wgrant> lamont: I can has slave log?
[06:57] <harpreet> jml: thanx , my account got fixed
[07:15] <NCommander> I'm trying to add a recipe to a bzr branch, but I don't have a link on the code page to add a recipe; is it possible toadd a recipe to a private branch?
[07:15] <wgrant> NCommander: No -- private branches aren't supported yet.
[07:16] <NCommander> wgrant: $#! :-/
[07:16] <NCommander> thanks
[07:20] <wgrant> NCommander: It's not yet entirely obvious how we're going to let the untrusted build slaves have access to just some branches.
[07:21] <NCommander> wgrant: yeah, its not a trivial problem, though I was hopingit might have already eben solved :-)
[07:21] <wgrant> We deliberately ignored that problem for the initial implementation.
[07:21] <NCommander> wgrant: heh :-)
[07:31] <Ologn> Hi
[07:32] <Ologn> I know launchpad tracks bugs through different projects, but does it have an option for tracking bugs that affect more than one package within a project?
[07:33] <Ologn> Not necessarily dual ownership of a bug, one being primary is fine, but is there anything that would indicate a bug affects more than one package WITHIN a project?
[07:33] <Ologn> Specifically in the case of bugs in obscure packages that keep getting reported in a more high profile one
[07:33] <Ologn> Some kind of pointer would help prevent a duplication of effort
[07:34] <wgrant> Ologn: You mean something like multiple source packages in Ubuntu?
[07:35] <Ologn> wgrant: Something like that.  Really even more of a pointer than anything
[07:36] <Ologn> For example:
[07:37] <Ologn> Bug #605577 is in language-pack-gnome-en-base
[07:37] <Ologn> But people keep reporting that bug in yelp
[07:38] <Ologn> So it is Project: Ubuntu, package: language-gnome-en-base.  But people are probably looking in the Project: Ubuntu, package: language-gnome-en-base queue for it
[07:38] <wgrant> Ologn: You can click "Also affects distribution", select Ubuntu and enter 'yelp', then close the yelp task as Invalid.
[07:38] <wgrant> Then it will show up in the search results when somebody tries to file a bug against yelp.
[07:46] <Ologn> wgrant: Ah, great, that works
[07:46] <Ologn> wgrant: Thanks
[08:55] <thekorn> hi guys, seems like edge has some issues combo.css and launchpad.js are not available
[08:55] <noodles775> thekorn: spm is in the process of fixing them (conv. on #launchpad-dev if you're interested :) )
[08:56] <thekorn> noodles775: ok, great, thanks
[10:19] <jml> harpreet, np.
[10:19] <harpreet> jml: :-)
[10:19] <harpreet> bye
[14:05] <ari-tczew> wgrant: around?
[14:05] <wgrant> ari-tczew: I am.
[14:06] <ari-tczew> wgrant: Hello, I got a problem. I'd check my @ubuntu.com e-mail alias. It didn't work.
[14:08] <wgrant> ari-tczew: Have you read https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuEmail?
[14:08] <ari-tczew> wgrant: yes
[14:09] <ari-tczew> wgrant: could you send e-mail to my alias?
[14:10] <wgrant> ari-tczew: It made it through to mail.canonical.com without trouble.
[14:13] <ari-tczew> wgrant: ok I got it. I couldn't send message to myself alias.
[15:14] <paultag> james_w: Have a second WRT recipies?
[15:16] <james_w> hi paultag
[15:16] <paultag> james_w: morning :)
[15:16] <paultag> james_w: I've had a daily build pending for 5 days or so, normal?
[15:16] <james_w> yes unfortunately
[15:17] <paultag> Righto, no bug to report, then :)
[15:31] <persia> What subscriptions are available for PPAs?  Upload or build notifications, or just build failures?  Also, are there any explicit ones, or are they all implicit?
[15:33] <bjsnider> is there anything wrong with the keyserver?
[15:33] <paultag> persia: I was looking for that the other day -- I could not find anything
[15:33] <bjsnider> there's a guy emailing me saying he cannot add the ppa no matter what
[15:33] <paultag> persia: I wanted notifications for all uploads, and I could not find it for the life of me
[15:34] <persia> paultag, That's what I thought.  I believe the owner and uploader get implicit notification of failures, but I hoped for something more.
[15:34] <paultag> persia: I think it's just the uploader, I'm not getting much as the owner on my nightlies
[15:34] <paultag> persia: me too :/
[16:11] <fooey> hi all. I'm fighting with my PPA! I've deleted all my packages, but when I dput I get an email stating "File ... already exists".
[16:11] <bigjools> fooey: https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/soyuz/+faq/990
[16:12] <fooey> thanks. will read now
[16:12] <fooey> yup
[16:12] <fooey> there you go
[16:12]  * bigjools wonders if we can program that into the bot
[16:14] <fooey> what's the best "free" way to increase time to build?
[16:14] <paultag> Oh right, I forgot the other reason I came in here
[16:14] <paultag> Is there any way I can convince the LP Admins to set a team to only allow join requests from teams and not people?
[16:14] <paultag> This has turned into a major pita :)
[16:15] <jml> paultag, Launchpad doesn't have that feature.
[16:16] <nigelb> paultag: hrm, write a script to reject individuals automatically?
[16:16] <paultag> nigelb: too much work :(
[16:16] <jml> paultag, why do you want to do that?
[16:16] <nigelb> (I think it can be done)
[16:16] <paultag> jml: ~locoteams should not have members requesting to join, just loco teams
[16:16] <paultag> jml: and every day I get some guy who thinks it's a great idea to request to join that team
[16:16] <paultag> jml: and every day I have to decine it
[16:16] <paultag> decline *
[16:17] <jml> paultag, I can see why that would be irritating.
[16:17] <nigelb> paultag: not much of work really, talk to these awesome folks ;)
[16:17] <paultag> jml: How hard would it be to patch up? I'm not opposed to coding
[16:17] <paultag> nigelb: yeah but I still have to run the script :)
[16:17] <nigelb> paultag: cron
[16:17] <paultag> nigelb: meh :)
[16:17] <jml> paultag, introducing it into Launchpad seems like overkill to me. I doubt any other team would want to be configured in such a way.
[16:18] <paultag> jml: fair enough. I'll just have to have my server do that nightly or something like nigelb said
[16:18] <paultag> jml: thanks
[16:18] <jml> paultag, np.
[16:18] <jml> paultag, procmail might be another option.
[16:18] <paultag> humm, yes, true
[16:18] <jml> paultag, that way you can ditch the email at the same time :)
[16:19] <paultag> jml: +1, thanks, I think I might do it that way -- it's "push" and saves me the email :)
[16:19] <jml> paultag, my pleasure. good luck!
[16:19] <paultag> thanks!
[17:15] <sensae> Hello. I've used the import feature to create a bzr branch from my git repo, but now it automatically pulls every 3 hours. This isn't the behavior I want - how do I stop the imports?
[17:20] <jml> sensae, hmm.
[17:21] <jml> sensae, what's the branch?
[17:21] <jml> sensae, also, why don't you want the Bazaar branch kept up-to-date?
[17:23] <sensae> jml: https://code.launchpad.net/~blainepace/xenscripts/trunk
[17:23] <sensae> jml: I'm moving my development to launchpad, I just wanted a single import before I delete the github repo.
[17:23] <jml> sensae, I like that reason :)
[17:24] <jml> sensae, do you see a link that page saying something like "Edit import source or review import"?
[17:25] <sensae> jml: Nothing like that.
[17:25] <jml> sensae, ok, thanks. it must be an admin control.
[17:26] <jml> sensae, I've stopped the import.
[17:27] <jml> sensae, I'm not sure there any easy way for you to have done so.
[17:28] <sensae> jml: Thanks. I had spent some time looking around and hadn't found one. I think for now if I import more repositories I'll do it myself with bzr-git :)
[17:29] <jml> sensae, yeah. that might be easier.
[17:29] <jml> sensae, I'll file a bug...
[17:29] <sensae> jml: alright.
[17:34] <mpt> holy crap that duplicate search was fast
[17:34]  * mpt applauds lifeless 
[17:40] <jml> mpt, it's nice. although I've filed a couple of near-dupes today that I probably wouldn't have under the more generous search.
[17:44] <pc_magas> hi where can I ask for building pacjages?
[17:45] <maxb> pc_magas: What about building packages?
[17:45] <pc_magas> I have created a program in C by myself and I want to upload to launchpad
[17:46] <pc_magas> but there is a problem to make in a package to upload in it
[17:46] <pc_magas> on it
[17:46] <pc_magas> but i cannot find the channel
[17:47] <nigelb> #ubuntu-packaging would be one place.
[17:48] <pc_magas> thanks
[18:35] <mpt> Could someone possibly revive bazaar.launchpad.net?
[18:40] <beuno> mpt, all dead. or only specific file?
[18:41] <mpt> beuno, ah, http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~indicator-applet-developers/indicator-me/trunk/files was giving me "Internal server error", but now it's back
[18:41] <beuno> mpt, right
[18:41] <beuno> so F5 multiple times is sometimes needed
[18:41] <beuno> as we've fixed problems with loggerhead, the remaining ones are getting more and more obscure
[18:44] <paultag> Hey, can I have someone abort a recipie pending?
[18:44] <paultag> It's targeted for the wrong PPA
[18:44] <paultag> 1368, 1369 and 1370
[20:19] <kklimonda> hey, is it possible to set up an existing mailing list as a contact for LP group?
[20:21] <kklimonda> we don't have any contact set for ~ubuntu-pl and, when owner tried to set ubuntu-pl@lists.ubuntu.com as contact, it didn't work - a confirmation email never made it to ML.
[20:23] <nigelb> kklimonda: it would have gone to the moderation queue.
[20:23] <nigelb> Did you ask the list admnin to check that?
[20:24] <kklimonda> nigelb: will do :)
[20:39] <ahasenack> guys, 6h to *start* building a package in my ppa, is there a problem or is the queue just too full?
[20:40] <ahasenack> and the package was accepted 2h ago
[21:03] <soren> ahasenack: https://launchpad.net/builders/
[21:03] <soren> ahasenack: Just a long queue. It's quite common.
[21:03] <ahasenack> soren: thanks, interesting page
[21:04] <soren> ahasenack: Very much so. I don't know if it's linked from anywhere, so it's one of my few memorised launchpad URLs.
[21:04] <ahasenack> soren: am I reading it right? One build per machine?
[21:04] <soren> ahasenack: Yes.
[21:05] <soren> ahasenack: Some of them are virtual machines, so it's multiple per physical box, but otherwise yes.
[21:05] <ahasenack> ok
[22:08] <fooey> hi, I'm creating a source package that's dependent on libapreq2-dev, building on lucid.
[22:09] <fooey> The problem is that apreq2-dev is broken, and I'm unsure it will be fixed in lucid. I've got a question about it here:
[22:10] <fooey> https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libapreq2/+question/121583
[22:10] <fooey> anyway, I have a workaround but I'm unsure of an elegant way to determine either the distribution name or the apreq2-dev version number within the debian/rules file. Is there a convention to follow?
[22:19] <fooey> anyone here?
[22:23] <james_w> don't link using .la files?
[22:23] <james_w> I don't know if they provide a way for you to get the version
[22:24] <james_w> the usual way to fix it would be to depend on a fixed version. You could upload the package to your PPA in the meantime, as a rebuild is all it should take to fix it
[22:26] <fooey> but the rebuild will tickle the code that would execute the fix.
[22:27] <fooey> and btw, the package doesn't link to .la files. I'm using values returned from apreq2-config
[23:09] <wgrant> Where are all the builders?
[23:11] <wgrant> lamont: Did you work out what was up with allspice?
[23:12] <lamont> wgrant: sort of
[23:13] <lamont> wgrant: bug 623975
[23:13] <lamont> so once we restarted b-m?  happy.  and then confirmed when we did roseapple after that
[23:14] <wgrant> lamont: Huh.
[23:14] <wgrant> What was the first reason for aborting it?
[23:15] <lamont> b-m claimed that it forgot about the build it had... only thing was, it never had one
[23:15] <lamont> or some such
[23:15] <lamont> it basically woke up dead
[23:15] <wgrant> Yeah, I was wondering which build it thought it hda.
[23:15] <lamont> I put the timestamp in for roseapple just so we could go stare at the logs later...
[23:16] <lamont> it wasn't quite a priority at the time
[23:16] <wgrant> Heh.