[00:20] <dfarning> satellit_, you should be able to find the correct packages to file bugs against at https://launchpad.net/~sugarteam/+maintained-packages
[00:20] <satellit_> thanks.
[00:21] <dfarning> satellit_, click on the package and click 'report a bug'
[00:22] <satellit_> what package would I chose in maverick  for loss of ring icons on deletion of read?
[00:23] <satellit_> sugar-base?
[00:24] <satellit_> sugar-0.88?
[00:24] <dfarning> satellit_, if in doubt please if against https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sugar-0.88 . We can sort it out later.
[00:25] <satellit_> ok
[00:29] <satellit_> david where is file a bug button all I get is listings?
[00:29] <satellit_> stupid
[00:31] <dfarning> satellit_, upper right corner there should be a 'report bug' link
[00:31] <satellit_> finally got it...onl on left link on that page...; (
[00:31] <satellit_> s/right
[00:41] <satellit_> dfarning: Bug #623674
[00:41] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 623674 in sugar-0.88 (Ubuntu) "delete read from USR-i386-20100824.iso lose icons on f3 ring and listing. only journal has .xo files installed (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/623674
[00:44] <dfarning> satellit_, got it and thanks.  I think there are two valid bugs in there:)  When manu comes on tomorrow morning (9:30 eastern time)  we will assign the bug to a developer.
[00:45] <satellit_> yw glad to help....
[02:55] <dfarning> satellit_, did you try the *824 build or the *823 build.
[03:19] <lfaraone> dfarning: shouldn't bug #623674 be in USR, not in Ubuntu?
[03:19] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 623674 in sugar-0.88 (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "delete read from USR-i386-20100824.iso lose icons on f3 ring and listing. only journal has .xo files installed (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/623674
[03:21] <dfarning> lfaraone, whats with marking it invalid?
[03:22] <lfaraone> dfarning: it's marked as affecting USR, not Ubuntu.
[03:22] <dfarning> lfaraone, for some reason favorites.activites (or something similar) is not being set.  thus only one of the activities is showing up in the favorites.
[03:22] <lfaraone> dfarning: is USR still pulling in packages from the sugarteam packages?
[03:22] <dfarning> lfaraone, no it is only using stuff from universe
[03:23] <lfaraone> dfarning: okay, my apologies, the bug is indeed def. in Ubuntu, then. :)
[03:23] <lfaraone> dfarning: let me try and reproduce it.
[03:23] <dfarning> lfaraone, we will need to move -meta and -setting to universe.
[03:24] <satellit_> dfarning 823 works 824 has no x ends at login on init 1
[03:24] <satellit_> that is why it is smaller
[03:24] <lfaraone> dfarning: okay, is meta/settings a priority for you? (over, say, reproducing this bug?)
[03:25] <satellit_> bug for 823
[03:25] <lfaraone> satellit_: in bug 623674 you said you were running 20100824.
[03:25] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 623674 in sugar-0.88 (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "delete read from USR-i386-20100824.iso lose icons on f3 ring and listing. only journal has .xo files installed (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/623674
[03:25] <satellit_> oops  sorry
[03:26] <dfarning> lfaraone, yes I think packaging -meta and -settings should be top so we can finalize the build system and create test images.
[03:26] <satellit_> never got to sugar in 824
[03:26] <lfaraone> satellit_: okay, but your report says you used 824...?
[03:26] <satellit_> can I change it?
[03:26] <lfaraone> dfarning: okay. On straight-up Ubuntu, starring/unstarring packaged activities works as expected. There is no option to remove packaged activities in Sugar.
[03:27] <lfaraone> satellit_: sure, there's an "edit" icon on the same line as "bug description"
[03:28] <dfarning> lfaraone, +1 the starring works.... but we should be able to set a selections of actives as favorites at install time.
[03:32] <lfaraone> satellit_: okay, your report has several bugs in it.
[03:32] <satellit_> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sugar-0.88/+bug/623674 revised
[03:32] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 623674 in sugar-0.88 (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "delete read from USR-i386-20100824.iso lose icons on f3 ring and listing. only journal has .xo files installed (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New]
[03:33] <satellit_> ubot has summary wrong
[03:33] <lfaraone> satellit_: right. I'm editing the description right now to clean up the text a bit. Read not starting should be a *different* bug.
[03:34] <satellit_> yes bug http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/1900
[03:34] <lfaraone> dfarning: is USR installing .XOs still?
[03:35] <satellit_> lfaraone: I did drag drop installs from USB and from surf 115 for terminal from ASLO
[03:35] <lfaraone> satellit_: okay, that's something that should be in the report. As is, I couldn't have guessed that.
[03:36] <lfaraone> satellit_: (thank you for testing the image, by the way)
[03:36] <dfarning> lfaraone, no it shouldn't be  currently USR _only_ installing sucrose-0.88.  Everything else is pulled in via dependancies.
[03:38] <lfaraone> dfarning: okay. where can I get the USR images?
[03:38]  * lfaraone searched the interwebs and couldn't find anything
[03:38] <satellit_> http://download.sugarlabs.org/usr/
[03:38] <dfarning> lfaraone, http://usr.sugarlabs.org/
[03:39] <dfarning> lfaraone, todays build is borked:( but 823 should work.
[03:39] <lfaraone> so 824 does not work, I should be testing 823
[03:39] <satellit_> yes
[03:39] <lfaraone> this is going to get confusing in a year when the dates wrap around :)
[03:40] <lfaraone> dfarning: care to use incremental daily build numbers so we don't have overlap once a year? :P
[03:40] <satellit_> http://download.sugarlabs.org/usr/USR-i386-20100823.iso
[03:40] <lfaraone> satellit_: I got it.
[03:40] <satellit_> ok
[03:41] <dfarning> lfaraone, now they are year month day.
[03:41] <lfaraone> dfarning: right. I'm just nostalgic for the OLPC joyride builds. (they got into the 2000s I think)
[03:42] <dfarning> lfaraone, i think dextrose is already in the 300s
[03:42] <lfaraone> dfarning: and we're in the 800s, we'll jump to 900s in a few days :)
[03:42] <satellit_> 353 on my XO-1
[03:43] <satellit_> why are there 7 ubuntu users  ?
[03:44] <satellit_> (in 823)
[03:44] <lfaraone> satellit_: what do you mean?
[03:45] <satellit_> if you log out have to use ubuntu as user to log in again...
[03:46] <satellit_> it lists users as ubuntu ubuntu ubuntu ubuntu ubuntu ubuntu ubuntu when you ask in terminal for users
[03:48] <satellit_> tried useradd command then did list of users on terminal....
[03:48] <satellit_> lfaraone try log out command on dropdown box
[03:49] <satellit_> f3 XO avitar
[03:51] <lfaraone> satellit_: wait. you added a bug watch about evince not allowing read to start to a bug about sugar eating activities when deleting one?
[03:52] <lfaraone> satellit_: can you please report the read not starting one as a separate bug? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sugar-read-activity-0.86/+filebug
[03:52] <satellit_> yes I added comment about it....
[03:52] <lfaraone> satellit_: it makes problems easier to track if we can have them in separate bugs.
[03:53] <satellit_> sorry I am a nubie to bug reporting....I can test.. can you change it or do I do another one?
[03:53] <lfaraone> satellit_: a separate bug, yes.
[03:54] <lfaraone> satellit_: a bug should represent a single problem, that requires a single fix (perhaps in multiple components) to be solved.
[03:55] <lfaraone> satellit_: does that make sense?
[03:57] <satellit_> yes - filing bug now
[03:59] <lfaraone> dfarning: are you intentionally only installing read in USR? I looked in /usr/share/sugar/activities and that was the only one present.
[04:00] <lfaraone> satellit_: hm. I don't see an option to delete Read in USR. http://img713.imageshack.us/img713/8315/screenshotjl.png
[04:00] <satellit_> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sugar-read-activity-0.86/+bug/623726
[04:00] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 623726 in sugar-read-activity-0.86 (Ubuntu) "read fails to start in USR-i386-20100823.iso (known sugar bug ) (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New]
[04:01] <lfaraone> satellit_: did you install read from ASLO?
[04:01] <satellit_> should be in /usr/share/sugar/activities... have to delete contents and directory
[04:01] <lfaraone> dfarning: right. why did you delete the directory?
[04:02] <satellit_> no read came installed on USR ,iso
[04:02] <dfarning> lfaraone, I think that we should install the default activities via -meta.  Which we are not using yet....
[04:02] <dfarning> lfaraone, delete which dir?
[04:02] <satellit_> I installed terminal from ASLO with surf 115 installed to journal by drag drop from 2nd USB
[04:02] <lfaraone> satellit_: sorry, that was meant for you.
[04:03] <satellit_> http://people.sugarlabs.org/Tgillard/Surf-115.xo
[04:03] <satellit_> dl to USB to install
[04:03] <lfaraone> satellit_: okay. You were given an option to delete Read?
[04:04] <satellit_> yes in f3 flat file listing drop down box
[04:04] <lfaraone> satellit_: that itself was a bug. Can you please try and see if you can do that again? I'm not given such an option when I tried.,
[04:05] <satellit_> booting CD...
[04:06] <satellit_> "try with out installing"
[04:07] <satellit_> Acer Aspire One with HP external USB DVD/CD writer
[04:09] <lfaraone> okay…
[04:11] <satellit_> drag drop surf 115 to journal
[04:11] <satellit_> activities
[04:12] <satellit_> connect to wireless network in f1
[04:12] <satellit_> see other avitars
[04:13] <satellit_> terminal in ASLO DL
[04:13] <satellit_> show in journal
[04:13] <lfaraone> dfarning: so usr is not in Git. Do you want in in Git, or Bzr?
[04:14] <lfaraone> dfarning: personally, I think the USR packages should be in bzr, since they *are* ubuntu-specific packages after all.
[04:14] <satellit_> my settings
[04:14] <satellit_> software update Read 78 to 86
[04:15] <dfarning> lfaraone, that is up to you -- I think they are ubuntu specif.  but do we want to require learning yet another tool?
[04:15] <satellit_> f3 flat file listing Read-86 drop down (-) erase
[04:15] <lfaraone> dfarning: like it or not, Ubuntu development happens in bzr. I mean, we can host it on alioth, but it's not really appropreate use of Debian resources IMHO.
[04:16] <lfaraone> dfarning: at some point, we'll need to patch somebody else's Ubuntu package which is maintained in bzr.
[04:17] <satellit_> this time have 2 icons on f3 circle; terminal and surf...they did not disappear...? same CD same PC?
[04:17] <dfarning> lfaraone, then bzr it is:(
[04:18] <satellit_> lfaraone: did not lose the circle icons this time?
[04:18] <lfaraone> satellit_: okay, well, it'll be hard to fix the bug unless we can get steps to reproduce :)
[04:18] <satellit_> will test on another laptop...to be sure
[04:18] <satellit_> yes
[04:20] <lfaraone> satellit_: does read 86 start, by the way?
[04:20] <satellit_> used sudo su in termial 31 command users get 7 ubuntu's
[04:20] <satellit_> read 86 does not start. same error
[04:21] <satellit_> loading log 23 from ASLO
[04:22] <satellit_> dl read
[04:22] <satellit_> 86
[04:22] <satellit_> read: failed to start
[04:23] <lfaraone> understood.
[04:24] <lfaraone> satellit_: oh, you mean running "who". That's because "ubuntu" is logged in on each TTY. That's not a problem…
[04:25] <satellit_> log ReadActivity Log Import error: .usr/share/activities/Read.activity/readactivity.py, line 28 <module>import evince
[04:25] <satellit_> undefined symbol evince.so
[04:25] <satellit_> ok same error in Soas
[04:26] <satellit_> TTY OK understand
[04:26] <satellit_> any thing else?
[04:27] <satellit_> maybe instead of default Live user session should default to ubuntu so user knows how to log in again
[04:28] <lfaraone> satellit_: ideally you should specify your name :)
[04:28] <satellit_> yes but it does not write to users so cannot log back in
[04:29] <satellit_> needs to set up new autologon user from sugar name
[04:29] <lfaraone> satellit_: okay, report a bug against http://launchpad.net/usr with screenshots so I know what you're talkin about re login.
[04:30] <satellit_> hard to do with CD... no screen shots possible on live CD
[04:31] <satellit_> maybe better to defeat logout drop down choice on menu
[04:32] <satellit_> fedora-livecd-soas.ks had this done
[04:32] <satellit_> spin-kickstarts
[04:32] <dfarning> satellit_, What you are talking about can be easily fixed via setting in gconf.
[04:33] <satellit_> ok maybe it should be considered
[04:34] <satellit_> dfarning: hav not tried to install to HD there it may be usefull if have 2or more users logged in on HD
[04:36] <satellit_> note shutdown does not work here have to log out then shutdown from gdm bar right bottom or root terminal shutdown -h now
[04:37] <satellit_> network aware
[04:37] <lfaraone> satellit_: screenshots used to be able to be taken by hitting "Alt+1" in Sugar, not sure if that's still true.
[04:37] <satellit_> have to go...bed calls good night....
[04:39] <satellit_> : )
[04:44] <lfaraone> USR-default-settings and USR-meta are now in bzr on http://code.launchpad.net/usr. I'll see about getting them ready for use in Ubuntu tomorrow.
[04:44] <dfarning> lfaraone, it get quite around here this time of day with everybody back in school.
[04:45]  * lfaraone -> sleep.
[04:45] <lfaraone> dfarning: yeah :)
[04:46] <dfarning> lfaraone,  thanks.  I would like to include settings and meta before digging to deeply into the build system failures.
[12:00] <dfarning> lfaraone, crap -- did you see that adding etoys as a dependency to sucrose moved sucrose to contrib?
[13:00] <satellit_> dfarning: good morning,  Doing an install test to 120GB USB external disk now with 823. I want to see if logout/logon problems exist this way or if they are artifact of Live CD
[13:20] <satellit_> dfarning: Browse 115 starts and runs in 823 as .xo drag drop.....(never expected that)
[13:21]  * satellit_ did drag drop of surf-115 wonder if that changed it?
[13:29] <satellit_> have 34 activities loaded drag-drop. and one (terminal) as ASLO DL  this seems to be only way it will work
[13:29] <satellit_> terminal-31
[13:30] <satellit_> logon an log off work with user info from install by the way
[13:31] <satellit_> s/and
[14:04] <satellit_> dfarning: lookin at log activity seems pygame is needed by pippy/physics-5/maze 6  evince is wrong for read-86/ socialcalc is missing hulahop
[14:09] <lfaraone> dfarning: no, but it's correct.
[14:14] <satellit_> lfaraone: Install to HD with 823 solves a lot of problems...
[14:14] <lfaraone> satellit_: specifically?
[14:15] <satellit_> do you see my scrollback comments
[14:15] <satellit_> used autologon and updates on install to HD
[14:16] <satellit_> 28 updates plus 14 security occured
[14:17] <satellit_> I can log on and off with user password set on install.....Problems last night were Live CD caused
[14:18] <satellit_> lfaraone: Browse 115 works now? (Maybe because I also loaded surf-115?)
[14:19] <lfaraone> satellit_: if you use the XO bundle, it'll work. (I think)
[14:19] <satellit_> I have to load terminal from ASLO will not work as drag drop install?
[14:20] <satellit_> is there any way for USR to load .xo files from ASLO as part of install like the updates?
[14:20]  * satellit_ it will install to a USB...
[14:22]  * satellit_ Wonders if extra librarys are loaded with surf-115 also usable by browse 115?
[14:22] <lfaraone> satellit_: no...
[14:25] <satellit_> has alsroot set up zero install? and why will terminal only work if Downloaded from ASLO but not drag drop from USB (Need to check this)
[14:26] <alsroot> satellit_: 0sugar implementation is still in process..
[14:26] <satellit_> I presently have 34 activities loaded and working from drag-drop plus terminal from ASLO...nice
[14:26] <satellit_> hope this helps......: )
[14:27] <satellit_> breakfast......
[14:35] <dfarning> lfaraone, good morning.
[14:36] <dfarning> lfaraone, seeta is having an all hands meeting this evening..... it think.
[14:40] <lfaraone> dfarning: hi, okay. our evening?
[14:40] <lfaraone> dfarning: jonas reverted the changes to sucrose FYI, or I would have corrected it to a suggets.
[14:42] <dfarning> lfaraone, +1
[14:46] <dfarning> lfaraone, http://piratepad.net/6RDteDmOCt  Can you join so we can review outstanding packaging task
[14:50] <lfaraone> dfarning: sure.
[15:45] <ankur> lfaraone,  around?
[15:46] <lfaraone> ankur: but of course.
[15:46] <ankur> :)
[15:46] <ankur> lfaraone,  did i need to change the section of sucrose package as well as etoys is non free.i completely forgot about that yesterday
[15:47] <ankur> and received a mail on mailing list , that is when i remembered
[15:47] <lfaraone> ankur: well, we don't want sucrose in contrib.
[15:47] <lfaraone> ankur: so we can't really add the dep..
[15:48] <ankur> lfaraone,  shall i revert then?
[15:48] <lfaraone> ankur: Jonas already did.
[15:49] <ankur> lfaraone,  didnt check it . but :)
[15:54] <lfaraone> dfarning: want to combine usr-default-settings and usr-meta into one source package with two binary packages?
[15:55] <dfarning> lfaraone, I copied the orginal ubuntu-netbook-remix structure..... one source does  make more sense.
[15:57] <lfaraone> dfarning: okay. I'm setting the maintainer to Sugar Team, moving Neeraj to Uploader and adding myself as an uploader. ("Uploaders" is not really necc, but it provides a point of contact for a package)
[15:57] <dfarning> lfaraone, +1
[16:02] <lfaraone> dfarning: lol, I didn't know USR was © 2004 Canonical Ltd. :)
[16:03] <lfaraone> dfarning: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Esugarteam/usr/ubuntu-sugar-remix-meta/annotate/head%3A/debian/changelog
[16:05] <dfarning> lfaraone, oops.
[16:18] <lfaraone> dfarning: is my work on this © Activity Central?
[16:27] <dfarning> lfaraone, please copy write to yourself.  I don't want to get invovled copywrite assignment....  and you guys are doing the work:)
[16:28] <lfaraone> dfarning: sure, but you're already covered under "work to hire" clauses of copyright law.
[16:31] <lfaraone> manusheel: do the folks at SEETA retain their personal copyright on the work they produce?
[16:31] <dfarning> lfaraone, I am thinking more about not centralizing code ownership in the hands of AC.  Right now I own AC on my own.  I don't want to be temped to do anything stupid for short term gain:)
[16:31] <lfaraone> dfarning: (I'm checking with manusheel so I can make sure I attribute it properly in debian/copyright)
[16:32] <lfaraone> dfarning: makes sense.
[17:01] <ankur> lfaraone,  i was having problems reimporting my sliderpuzzle tar ball
[17:01] <ankur> i downloaded the original tar ball and renamed it as sugar-sliderpuzzle-activity_8.orig.tar.bz2
[17:01] <lfaraone> ankur: okay.
[17:02] <ankur> I copied it in sugar-sliderpuzzle-acitivity folder
[17:02] <ankur> and gave command from terminal : git-import-orig --pristine-tar "8" sugar-sliderpuzzle-activity_8.orig.tar.bz2
[17:02] <ankur> but it seems that it is not working
[17:03] <ankur> i guess two reasons :
[17:03] <lfaraone> ankur: okay.
[17:03] <lfaraone> ankur: when you say
[17:03] <lfaraone> ankur: when you say "not working", how is it not working?
[17:04] <ankur> it is giving error , and it is regarding improper usage of the import command
[17:04] <ankur> first line of error : Usage: git-import-orig [-u version] /path/to/upstream-version.tar.gz
[17:04] <ankur> then it explains various usage of the flags and command options
[17:05] <ankur> do i need to repack the activity original source to tar.gz or is there some thing else i am doing wrong?
[17:05] <lfaraone> ankur: if you're getting a usage message, you're invoking the command incorrectly...
[17:05] <ankur> also some time back you asked me to make changes in gbp.conf , if i remember for bz2 type
[17:06] <lfaraone> ankur: you don't need "8"…
[17:06] <ankur> no version no .. ?
[17:06] <ankur> we used that when i initially packaged .
[17:06] <lfaraone> ankur: okay. you don't need it, because git is smart enough to figure out the version number from the file name.
[17:07] <ankur> i tried this time without version no. and it imported successfully. i tink i was doing some thing else wrong but i retyped the command , it worked this time
[17:07] <lfaraone> manusheel: yes, I'm around.
[17:08] <ankur> what else changes i need to make while reimporting
[17:08] <lfaraone> ankur: I think that was it, unless I mentioned something else in the mail. I don't have your package in front of me at the moment.
[17:08] <ankur> i mean , specifically..... how do you know the diff if i package uses git as a source or upstream tarball
[17:08] <manusheel> lfaraone: In reference to your question, we do centralize the work under the aegis of SEETA (Software for Education, Entertainment and Training Activities).
[17:09] <manusheel> http://seeta.in
[17:09] <ankur> lfaraone,  okay , i will upload it and will you review it ?
[17:09] <ankur> hi manusheel  sir
[17:09] <lfaraone> ankur: because in your pristine-tar branch it'll tell me what tarball you used to import the package.
[17:09] <lfaraone> manusheel: okay, so the © is assigned to SEETA for your employees.
[17:09] <ankur> lfaraone,  :)
[17:10]  * lfaraone -> lunch
[17:10] <ankur> lfaraone,  one last question
[17:10] <manusheel> lfaraone: Yes.
[17:10] <ankur> do i need to mention anywhere that i have used bz2 as a source format rather than standard tar.gz?
[17:10] <manusheel> lfaraone: And, the website name is mentioned.
[17:11] <manusheel> ankur: Hi Ankur.
[17:11] <manusheel> ankur: Did we resolve the e-toys issue?
[17:11] <ankur> manusheel,  sir , we tried making changes in sucrose last night but etoys as a dependency in package will make it non free
[17:12] <ankur> so we reverted that commit
[17:12] <ankur> i have asked for more details on Launch pad so that i can help Caroline and close the bug
[17:12] <manusheel> ankur: Sure. Neat approach indeed.
[17:13] <ankur> manusheel sir :) , i have marked the bug as imcomplete for the time being
[17:14] <manusheel> ankur: I think we'll face the same issue in Squeak, right?
[17:14] <ankur> yes if that is packaged as a seperate activity but i don know the exact nature
[17:14] <ankur> i think caroline used .xo file to install the package
[17:15] <ankur> and hence dependencies were not satisfied . What i packaged in eToys , etoys was already as a dependency .
[17:15] <ankur> so if you sue deb file to install it , there should be no issues but manual installation will again result in same problem
[17:17] <ankur> lfaraone,  when i reimport the tarball , i am getting following error :
[17:17] <ankur> Upstream version is 8
[17:17] <ankur> Repository has uncommitted changes, commit these first:
[17:17] <ankur> # On branch master
[17:17] <ankur> # Untracked files:
[17:17] <ankur> #   (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
[17:17] <ankur> #
[17:17] <ankur> #	sugar-sliderpuzzle-activity_8.orig.tar.bz2
[17:17] <ankur> nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use "git add" to track)
[17:20] <ankur> lfaraone,  sorry i sorted that out but i have got the following one : http://paste.ubuntu.com/483533/
[17:24] <lfaraone> ankur: hm. I think you may need to delete the upstream branch and reimport.
[17:24] <ankur> and how will i do it?
[17:25] <lfaraone> ankur: "git help branch"
[17:25] <ankur> well i was seethat only
[17:25] <ankur> :)
[17:25] <ankur> -d flag?
[17:25] <lfaraone> dfarning: yes.
[17:26] <ankur> lfaraone,  was that yes  for me?
[17:26] <lfaraone> ankur: yes.
[17:26] <lfaraone> dfarning: sorry :)
[17:29] <ankur> lfaraone,  i used git branch -D upstream
[17:29] <ankur> now there is no upsream branch , should i create that manually before importing?
[17:33] <lfaraone> ankur: sure,
[17:36] <manusheel> ankur: Ok.
[17:37] <ankur> lfaraone,  not able to find out how to do it
[17:38] <ankur> i added --upstream-branch as tag as well
[17:38] <ankur> 1. was that right
[17:38] <ankur> ?
[17:38] <lfaraone> ankur: it's covered in the git-branch documentation.
[17:38] <lfaraone> ankur: uh?
[17:38] <ankur> not tag but flag
[17:38] <lfaraone> ankur: that's not needed.
[17:38] <ankur> in import command
[17:39] <lfaraone> ankur: you should be a ble to just do "git branch upstream"
[17:39] <lfaraone> (to create a upstream branch)
[17:42] <ankur> lfaraone,  thanks and done :)
[17:43] <ankur> will you be able review it today?
[17:43] <ankur> or else notify me when you get time :)
[17:43] <lfaraone> ankur: just mark it for review. I probably can't get to it during *your* today :)
[17:45] <ankur> lfaraone,  :) , sure i get that .
[17:45] <ankur> marking it for review
[17:47]  * ankur needs to go for now. Says bye to all :)
[18:53] <dfarning> lfaraone,   I finally figured out why the past couple of day' ISO have been failing.  As soon as usr-meta is in universe we can fix the issues.
[18:53] <lfaraone> dfarning: sure.
[20:14] <lfaraone> dfarning: okay, I think I have something working. Should I upload it to NEW in the archive, or to the PPA?
[20:24] <dfarning> lets test it in the ppa.
[20:27] <neeraj> dfarning: hi :)
[20:27] <dfarning> neeraj, hey how are you?
[20:28] <neeraj> dfarning: I am good. Thanks for  asking. How about you ?
[20:28] <dfarning> great.
[20:31] <lfaraone> dfarning: done. It's also available as a bzr branch at lp:usr
[20:32] <dfarning> lfaraone, thanks I run a test this evening.
[20:32] <lfaraone> dfarning: cool, if it works, I'll get it uploaded either tonight or tomorrow morning.
[20:33] <dfarning> lfaraone, sounds great. thanks.
[21:36] <lfaraone> neeraj: can you request a sync of etoys, irc, poll, and record? it's after feature freeze, so you'll need to provide a justification according to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess#FeatureFreeze%20for%20new%20packages
[21:37] <lfaraone> neeraj: our reason for wanting them in Ubuntu is that they're shipped in Sugar on a Stick, which we're striving for feature parity for, and the code is well tested upstream.
[21:39] <neeraj> lfaraone: Request Sync. Edit the description-> add reason. sound sane?
[21:40] <lfaraone> neeraj: if you pass the "-e" flag to requestsync it'll ask you for a justification and subscrive the right people.
[21:41] <neeraj> lfaraone: Ok. Great.
[21:52] <lfaraone> neeraj: on second thought, just give a rationale in one of the bug reports as to why you want a FFe, and request that a "standing FFe" be granted for all activities in the SoaS set. Then reference the request for a FFe in your other sync bugs.
[21:53] <lfaraone> rather than duplicating the rationale in each bug.
[21:54] <neeraj> lfaraone: ok..
[21:55] <neeraj> lfaraone: before requesting sync of all activities, I will confirm with other members that whether they are working perfectly in Maverick or not.
[21:56] <lfaraone> neeraj: okay, that's a good idea.
[21:56] <neeraj> lfaraone: or better I will try to test them on my own and request it today itself I will get time to do so.
[21:57] <lfaraone> neeraj: either works for me.
[22:00] <neeraj> lfaraone: what about the s-log-a-0.86. In ubuntu we have it with different name (log viewer). right?
[22:01] <lfaraone> neeraj: we should request that s-logviewer-a be dropped from the archive (in one bug) and that s-log-a-0.86 be synced in a separate one.
[22:02] <neeraj> lfaraone: Ok. Valid reason for dropping it? Should I just mention that this package has been renamed and new one is in sync queue?
[22:03] <lfaraone> neeraj: yes.
[22:04] <satellit_> lfaraone: glad to test activities (.xo) in 823 today, (I will be off line for next 2 days)
[22:05] <satellit_> i have a HD install
[22:10] <lfaraone> satellit_: cool, thanks. Can you test all the sugar-*-activity packages?
[22:10] <satellit_> ok let me boot them up...where do I report ?
[22:11] <lfaraone> satellit_: if it doesn't work, report a bug against the specific activity that didn't work in Launchpad.
[22:11] <lfaraone> satellit_: collect your results (ie Foo crashed, reported as bug #. Bar worked fine. Baz wasn uninstallable)
[22:11] <satellit_> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Soas_V4/ASLOxo_Activity_Test_Table#Activity_Test_Results  done for USR-i386-20100804.iso
[22:12] <lfaraone> satellit_: collect your results (ie "Foo crashed, reported as bug #. Bar worked fine. Baz wasn uninstallable") into an email, a wikipage, or whatever you feel like.
[22:12] <satellit_> look at those tests see if applicable
[22:13] <lfaraone> neeraj: ScottK (an Ubuntu Release team member) just gave us FFe approval for "an FFe for the metapackage, the default settings, and syncing from Debian."
[22:14] <neeraj> lfaraone: :)
[22:16] <dfarning> lfaraone, neeraj you guys rock! .... the meta package worked so you can push it when you get a chance.
[22:17] <neeraj> dfarning: but most of the work on meta was done and guided by u :)
[22:48] <lfaraone> dfarning: FFe for meta ACK'd by ~ubuntu-release, ~riddell said he'll accept the package in a few minutes when Launchpad parses the upload I comissioned a few minutes ago.
[22:50] <dfarning> lfaraone, thanks luke.  Looks like we are finally rid of that damn ppa:)
[22:50] <lfaraone> neeraj: okay, what Scott said is that we'll still need release team approval for our syncs, but he's telling us he'll be happy to approve them.
[22:51] <lfaraone> dfarning: we're not out of the woods yet, we still need to ship a working web browser. :)
[22:51] <neeraj> lfaraone: Ok.
[22:52] <neeraj> lfaraone: dfarning hopefully we will get a working web browser soon(if the major issues have been resolved ). Other members are working on it. :)
[22:53] <dfarning> lfaraone, no but we can see the light at the end of the tunnel.  to mix some metaphors.
[22:54] <lfaraone> :P
[22:56] <neeraj> lfaraone, dfarning Good Night.
[22:57] <lfaraone> neeraj: see you in the morrow.
[22:57] <dfarning> neeraj, good night and thanks
[23:10] <lfaraone> dfarning: "ubuntu-sugar-remix-meta 0.2 (Accepted)". Bring out the champagne!
[23:13] <dfarning> lfaraone, awesome!  Tonight will will spin our first ISO from packages entirely in universe. -- execpting etoys.
[23:58] <satellit_> dfarning: congratulations.....will look for new .iso   : )