[01:12] <MTecknology> cjohnston: 'can you use a link that causes a 301 instead of the direct link'
[01:13] <MTecknology> cjohnston: doesn't make sense :P
[14:35]  * newz2000 was offline yesterday, check's out cjohnston's bug
[14:37] <cjohnston> hey newz2000!
[14:37] <cjohnston> I'm only around for a few minutes
[14:37] <newz2000> I think it's a good plan
[14:37] <cjohnston> whats that? change the link?
[14:38] <newz2000> yeah, change the links that point to the download link
[15:18] <stas_> newz2000: ping
[15:18] <newz2000> hey stas, in a meeting but you can have some of my attention
[15:18] <stas_> when you get some time, here's the project i was working on, http://scholarpress.github.com/buddypress-courseware/
[15:19] <stas_> you'll find there handbook and screens so you can see all the features and workflow
[15:19] <newz2000> oh, awesome, I was going to work with a friend on that later this month
[15:19] <stas_> great, we moved it to github, so bugs/patches welcome :)
[17:20] <newz2000> hi, I'm reading to do a small group of testing on the new wiki theme
[17:20] <newz2000> mdke: ^
[17:20] <newz2000> (and everyone here)
[17:21] <newz2000> I want to start out with a small group in order to avoid getting hundreds of duplicate bugs.
[17:21] <newz2000> We can catch the first round and then do some fixes, then do broader testing
[17:21] <knome> newz2000, will it still be publicly available?
[17:21] <newz2000> yep
[17:21] <newz2000> it's live now
[17:21] <knome> okay, what's the url?
[17:21] <newz2000> you have to log in then go to user preferences and change your theme to "light"
[17:21] <newz2000> wiki.ubuntu.com
[17:21] <knome> okay
[17:21] <knome> nice :)
[17:21] <knome> thanks
[17:22] <newz2000> Please report bugs on the theme at http://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-website and TAG them with light-wiki
[17:22] <knome> hmm
[17:23] <knome> will there be the last-used breadcrumb?
[17:23] <newz2000> knome: it's not currently in the theme, but there could be
[17:23] <knome> the username, Logout and Help texts doesn't seem to be vertically aligned with "Ubuntu Wiki"
[17:23] <knome> i've noticed i use it a lot in the ubuntu wiki
[17:23] <newz2000> it does look off, doesn't it
[17:23] <newz2000> Will you go ahead and file bugs on them?
[17:24] <knome> them == which all? :)
[17:24] <newz2000> as many as you can. :-)
[17:24] <knome> hehe
[17:24] <newz2000> If you just do one or two some one else will catch others
[17:24] <knome> do you want a bug for the last-used breadcrumb?
[17:24] <newz2000> For canonical's intranet theme I created a drop down menu of favourites and the breadcrumb trail, maybe that would be a good oslution here
[17:24] <newz2000> knome: sure
[17:25] <knome> okay, i'll add that as well
[17:25] <newz2000> Thanks for your testing (and anyone else who would like to test too)
[17:25] <knome> newz2000, no problem sir
[17:27] <newz2000> Hmm... I thought I had the "subscribed" links list showing in testing... wonder what happened with that
[17:30] <knome> is the space with two separators between Edit and Info links intentional?
[17:30] <newz2000> no, it's a config issue, gotta correct the wikiconf.py
[17:30] <knome> okay
[17:30] <knome> want me to file a bug?
[17:31] <newz2000> sure
[17:31] <knome> okay
=== newz2000 changed the topic of #ubuntu-website to: The Ubuntu Web Presence Team | We have an email list | see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Website for more info | Test the "light" theme on wiki.u.c and tag bugs as light-wiki in ubuntu-website product
[17:32] <knome> the "more actions" dropdown is not vertically aligned - do you want a new bug for that or attach it to the other vert-align bug?
[17:32] <newz2000> you can add it to the other one
[17:33] <knome> okay
[17:33] <knome> have you planned to add more padding to the edit etc. links?
[17:33] <knome> so that they would span the whole "bar" vertically?
[17:33] <knome> would make hitting them more easy
[17:34] <newz2000> knome: no, not really
[17:34] <knome> really?!
[17:34] <knome> the orange "Ubuntu Wiki" does have bottom-padding
[17:35] <newz2000> oh, vertically
[17:35] <newz2000> yes, that would be a good plan
[17:35] <knome> mmh
[17:35] <knome> okay
[17:35] <knome> i'll add another bug
[17:35] <newz2000> thanks
[17:36] <knome> np :)
[17:37] <knome> is the weird alignment of the frontpage "boxes" a bug ?
[17:38]  * newz2000 checks
[17:38] <newz2000> that is a side-effect
[17:38] <knome> okay
[17:38] <newz2000> may not be easily fixed
[17:38] <knome> that's what i thought
[17:38] <newz2000> because it is centered in the content area
[17:38] <knome> yeah
[17:39] <knome> it probably will be tackled later, when this theme is default
[17:39] <newz2000> while I'm eager to fix all defects, this one is the type of thing I'm very itnerested in seeing
[17:39] <newz2000> I couldn't test with live data easily
[17:40] <knome> is it only me, but is the wiki slow again?
[17:40] <knome> is it a bug that the tabled do not have separator lines anymore automatically?
[17:40] <newz2000> it happens from tiem to time, especially when doing saves
[17:41] <knome> former or latter? x)
[17:41] <newz2000> knome: it might have been deliberate, would you file a bug and we'll investigate the best solution?
[17:41] <knome> okay, i'll do
[17:41] <newz2000> my first comment was for your first comment, my second for your second
[17:42] <knome> oki ;)
[17:43] <newz2000> tags must be cached for some type
[17:44] <knome> hmm?
[17:45] <knome> i suppose it's intentional that the subheading sizes are quite small?
[17:45] <newz2000> its my opinion that all of the font sizes are a bit small, but I copied that right from ubuntu.com
[17:46] <knome> ...want a bug? :P
[17:46] <newz2000> I'd say if it's diff than ubuntu.com then yes
[17:46] <newz2000> if you want to file it, then ok, I'll reject it if it's the same as ubuntu.com and others coming after can see it. :-)
[17:46] <knome> i'm not sure...
[17:47] <knome> is it planned that the wikipages can also use <h1> (=Title=) ?
[17:47] <newz2000> knome: not sure what you mean by that
[17:47] <newz2000> can you give an example of a page?
[17:48] <knome> let me file an another bug first
[17:48] <newz2000> sure
[17:49] <knome> in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Xubuntu/Artwork/Maverick, the biggest header size we've used is == Title ==
[17:49] <knome> that's why the subheadings look small. so, are we supposed to be using = Title = as well? :)
[17:50] <newz2000> That will be a tough one
[17:50] <newz2000> The problem is that people used a sub-heading because they thought the styles for the main heading were too big
[17:50] <knome> yeah, but now with the new theme... i'd rather bump all the headings up
[17:50] <knome> because === is too small
[17:51] <newz2000> but what about others who used = heading= ?
[17:51] <knome> "Icon" under "New Xubuntu Logo" is === !
[17:51] <newz2000> wow
[17:51] <newz2000> I guess file a bug and expect discussion
[17:51] <knome> okay
[17:51] <knome> i'll do that, thanks
[17:58] <knome> btw, the last edited ... by ... link is somewhat weird
[17:58] <knome> or, in weird place
[17:59] <knome> also, do you think some pages (like toolbars that xubuntu uses) could span the whole space horizontally?
[18:00]  * newz2000 looks again
[18:01] <newz2000> regarding last-edited, that does look out of place, regarding the spanning full width, I think it needs to be discussed
[18:02] <newz2000> I'm going to get some lunch, feel free to file bugs. If you're thinking them there's a good chance someone else will too.
[18:02] <knome> okay
[18:02] <knome> bon appetit
[18:02] <newz2000> Thanks. ;-)