=== jjohansen is now known as jj-afk === AndrewMC is now known as SpockVulcan === SpockVulcan is now known as AndrewMC === AndrewMC is now known as SpockVulcan === SpockVulcan is now known as AndrewMC === noy_ is now known as noy === noy_ is now known as noy === dholbach__ is now known as dholbach === yofel_ is now known as yofel === ian_brasil__ is now known as ian_brasil === bjf[afk] is now known as bjf === ian_brasil_ is now known as ian_brasil [15:56] hi skaet [15:56] hi marjo :) [15:59] o/ [16:00] hi [16:00] \o [16:00] o/ [16:01] hi all, feels about time to start. anyone else we're waiting for? [16:01] hi [16:01] * ScottK votes start on time and let people catch up as needed. [16:01] * skaet thinks that sounds good. [16:01] #startmeeting [16:01] Meeting started at 10:01. The chair is skaet. [16:01] Commands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE] [16:02] [TOPIC] 10.10 [16:02] New Topic: 10.10 [16:02] any updates from dyfet on the open actions? [16:02] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReleaseTeam/Meeting/2010-08-27 [16:02] skaet: Got patches from NCommander and Riddell, so it's OBE. [16:03] (the KDE one) [16:03] ScottK, thanks. will stop carrying it forward then. [16:03] In fact KDE 4.5 is now fully built on armel for the first time. [16:03] ScottK: \o/ [16:03] :) [16:04] will it be going out with 10.10 beta? === oubiwann is now known as oubiwann-away === oubiwann-away is now known as oubiwann [16:05] We should have images, but Kubuntu on armel isn't a primary target for that architecture. [16:05] ScottK, ok. [16:06] [TOPIC] QA team report [16:06] New Topic: QA team report [16:06] Hardware testing [16:06] http://people.canonical.com/~fader/hw-testing/current.html [16:06] Laptops: [16:06] Passed: 41 (85%) Failed: 1 ( 2%) Untested: 6 (13%) [16:06] Servers: [16:06] LINK received: http://people.canonical.com/~fader/hw-testing/current.html [16:06] Passed: 58 (85%) Failed: 0 ( 0%) Untested: 10 (15%) [16:06] Netbooks: [16:06] Passed: 12 (75%) Failed: 0 ( 0%) Untested: 4 (25%) [16:06] Desktops: [16:06] Passed: 11 (79%) Failed: 0 ( 0%) Untested: 3 (21%) [16:07] Boot Performance [16:07] http://people.canonical.com/~ameetp/BootChart.html [16:07] Per robbiew's request, the report now separates UNE and Desktop. [16:07] Kbuntu will be added next. [16:07] Boot Performance Week of 2010-08-23 to 2010-08-27 [16:07] ------------------------------------------------- [16:07] LINK received: http://people.canonical.com/~ameetp/BootChart.html [16:07] Number of system regressions on Ubuntu Desktop: 0 [16:07] Number of system regressions on Ubuntu Netbook Edition: 0 [16:07] ScottK: Kbuntu will be added next. [16:07] Great. [16:08] # Milestoned Features [16:08] * qa-maverick-mago-daily - postponed to end of release, due to higher priority tasks [16:08] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/qa-maverick-mago-daily [16:08] skaet: that's all from QA team [16:08] marjo, thanks! [16:09] any particular concerns as we head into beta next week? [16:10] skaet: none at this time; sent out reminders for ISO testing [16:10] cool. thanks. any other questions for QA? [16:10] [TOPIC] security team [16:10] New Topic: security team [16:11] hi [16:11] [LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/ReleaseStatus/Maverick [16:11] LINK received: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/ReleaseStatus/Maverick [16:11] [LINK] http://people.canonical.com/~pitti/workitems/maverick/canonical-security.html [16:11] LINK received: http://people.canonical.com/~pitti/workitems/maverick/canonical-security.html [16:11] We currently have no milestoned bugs. [16:11] We are waiting for feedback on the openssl and related packages in -proposed for security-m-tls-renegotiation-updates, our last remaining essential blueprint. [16:11] Work on arm-m-missing-security-features is ongoing. [16:12] Hope to release ufw 0.30 and get it into maverick for beta. We have a pre-release of 0.30 in maverick now, and this would be a pure bugfix upload-- fixes a couple packaging issues as well as several IPv6 bugs. See SecurityTeam/ReleaseStatus/Maverick for details. [16:12] that may have to wait til after beta [16:12] Getting upstream apparmor userspace 2.5.1 together is ongoing, which is something that we will want in Maverick, but not beta. It has many fixes for the userspace tools to work with our maverick (and upstream) kernel [16:13] * skaet makes a note to keep an eye open for ufw 0.30 [16:13] that's pretty much it from me [16:13] nice. [16:13] any questions? [16:14] [TOPIC] kernel team [16:14] New Topic: kernel team [16:14] [LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/ReleaseStatus/Maverick [16:14] [LINK] http://people.canonical.com/~pitti/workitems/maverick/canonical-kernel-team-ubuntu-10.10-beta.html [16:14] [LINK] http://people.canonical.com/~pitti/workitems/maverick/canonical-kernel-team.svg [16:14] LINK received: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/ReleaseStatus/Maverick [16:14] LINK received: http://people.canonical.com/~pitti/workitems/maverick/canonical-kernel-team-ubuntu-10.10-beta.html [16:14] LINK received: http://people.canonical.com/~pitti/workitems/maverick/canonical-kernel-team.svg [16:14] All our specs/blueprints for Beta are complete. [16:14] sweet. [16:14] On the bugs noted in the agenda, status is as follows: [16:14] Bug 605488 - After speaking with ogra and GrueMaster, we're closing this bug for now as no one is able to reproduce the issue any more. Should this re-appear the bug will be re-opened. [16:14] Launchpad bug 605488 in linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Maverick) "BUG: scheduling while atomic: mmcqd/46/0x00000002" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/605488 [16:14] Bug 605739 - Believed to be resolved in the latest linux-ti-omap4-2.6.34-903.7 kernel. Still waiting for verification before closing. [16:14] Launchpad bug 605739 in linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Maverick) "BUG: Bad page state in process swapper pfn:94d23" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/605739 [16:15] Bug 624915 - debian-installer issue which cjwatson has already resolved. [16:15] Launchpad bug 624915 in debian-installer (Ubuntu Maverick) "maverick kvm guests not seeing virtio disks" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/624915 [16:15] Bug 291760 - Numerous comments to the bug indicate this is not a kernel issue nor is there any confirmation against a Maverick kernel. I've subsequently closed this bug against the kernel and posted a comment. [16:15] Launchpad bug 291760 in NetworkManager "network-manager roams to (none) ((none)) - background scanning" [Unknown,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/291760 [16:15] Bug 615400 - Believed to be resolved with the current kernel. Waiting for verification before closing. [16:15] Launchpad bug 615400 in flash-kernel (Ubuntu Maverick) "package initramfs-tools 0.97.2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/615400 [16:15] Bug 613855 - Patches applied and kernel uploaded (linux-2.6.35-19.26). [16:15] Launchpad bug 613855 in linux (Ubuntu Maverick) "omap3 beagle XM MMC card always comes up readonly" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/613855 [16:15] As a general status, we've rebased to the latest 2.6.35.3 upstream stable kernel which was basically a set of regression fixes from 2.6.35.2. We also uploaded a kernel yesterday with fixes for 613855. We are above the trend line for our Beta release burndown chart but below the trend line overall. The remaining Beta release work items are not release critical. [16:16] Questions? [16:16] thanks ogasawara. :) [16:16] [TOPIC] Foundations team [16:16] New Topic: Foundations team [16:17] hi [16:17] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FoundationsTeam/ReleaseStatus/Maverick#RC%20Milestoned%20bugs [16:17] hm [16:18] [LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FoundationsTeam/ReleaseStatus/Maverick#RC%20Milestoned%20bugs [16:18] LINK received: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FoundationsTeam/ReleaseStatus/Maverick#RC%20Milestoned%20bugs [16:18] skipping the feature section there this week, as we should mostly be focusing on bugs now [16:18] two bugs I want to call out there [16:19] bug 613008: Evan says he can work on this on Tuesday, but will that be too late for beta? if so, I can try to figure something out this afternoon [16:19] Launchpad bug 613008 in ubiquity (Ubuntu Maverick) "failed to install oem-config from CD" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/613008 [16:19] robbiew, thoughts? [16:20] bug 441941: this has been around since we switched to grub2 in 10.04. The limited actual data (as opposed to VERY large number of comments) in the bug suggests that it may be simply because grub2's core.img is somewhat bigger than grub legacy's stage1.5, in which case there is a very limited amount that we can actually do about this. I acknowledge it's a serious issue for those affected, but wonder how much use it is ... [16:20] ... to treat it as RC [16:20] Launchpad bug 441941 in grub2 (Ubuntu Maverick) "grub fails after running Windows" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/441941 [16:21] also, I downgraded bug 459639 to Medium. Anyone affected by this should comment [16:21] Launchpad bug 459639 in upstart (Ubuntu Maverick) "X server starts randomly in failsafe when starting from cold boot" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/459639 [16:22] skaet: cjwatson: seems 613008 has a workaround [16:22] yes, be online [16:22] so if we can't get it into Beta [16:22] we should at least release note it...again :/ [16:23] ok [16:23] any questions for colin? [16:24] thanks colin. [16:24] s/colin/cjwatson/ sigh.... [16:24] [TOPIC] server team [16:24] New Topic: server team [16:25] hi! [16:25] Server team status is up to date at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/MaverickReleaseStatus [16:25] hi! [16:25] About Maverick bugs, I spent some time recently reviewing all High and a few Medium -server bugs to fill the bucket again. Here you go: [16:25] Beta-milestoned bugs: [16:25] Bug 619843 - euca-get-console-output returns one single line (Daviey): should be in next eucalyptus upload [16:25] Launchpad bug 619843 in Eucalyptus "euca-get-console-output returns one single line" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/619843 [16:25] Bug 599342 - Temporary failure in name resolution (hallyn): waiting for input from OP, potentially deferred [16:25] Launchpad bug 599342 in libvirt (Ubuntu Maverick) "Temporary failure in name resolution" [Medium,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/599342 [16:25] Bug 613535 - cloud-debug.log reports errno=2 trying to execute 'bttrack' (Daviey): should be in next eucalyptus upload [16:25] Launchpad bug 613535 in eucalyptus (Ubuntu Maverick) "cloud-debug.log reports errno=2 trying to execute 'bttrack'" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/613535 [16:26] Bug 617053 - on upgrade from 1.6.2, euca_upgrade should preserve DISABLE_ISCSI="Y" (Daviey): needs verification, might be already fixed [16:26] Launchpad bug 617053 in eucalyptus (Ubuntu Maverick) "on upgrade from 1.6.2, euca_upgrade should preserve DISABLE_ISCSI="Y"" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/617053 [16:26] High, release targeted bugs: [16:26] Bug 574665 - kvm + virtio disk corrupts >1TB large volumes (hallyn): more investigation required [16:26] Launchpad bug 574665 in qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Maverick) "kvm + virtio disk corrupts large volumes (>1TB)." [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/574665 [16:26] Bug 564355 - run-instance request in same security group causes eucalyptus to remove network (hggdh): needs verification [16:26] Launchpad bug 564355 in eucalyptus (Ubuntu Maverick) "Second euca-run-instance request in same security group causes eucalyptus to remove network assoicated with security group" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/564355 [16:26] Bug 584048 - kvm images losing connectivity w/bridged network (hallyn): nearing a solution [16:26] Launchpad bug 584048 in qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Maverick) "kvm images losing connectivity w/bridged network" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/584048 [16:26] Bug 620441 - MySQL upstart stop job does not cleanly shutdown mysql (SpamapS): more investigation needed [16:26] Launchpad bug 620441 in mysql-dfsg-5.1 (Ubuntu Maverick) "MySQL upstart stop job does not cleanly shutdown mysql" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/620441 [16:26] Bug 606715 - Logfile defintions wrong after changes to logfile rotation in Ubuntu Lucid (ttx): triaged [16:26] Launchpad bug 606715 in logwatch (Ubuntu Maverick) "Logfile defintions wrong after changes to logfile rotation in Ubuntu Lucid" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/606715 [16:26] Bug 619712 - keepalived vrrp race condition (RoakSoaX): patch needs verification [16:26] Launchpad bug 619712 in keepalived (Ubuntu Maverick) "keepalived vrrp race condition and fix (versions 1.1.17 and 1.2.0 but perhaps all?)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/619712 [16:27] Then there is a list that I will spare you, maverick-targeted bugs that are more targets of opportunity for the next weeks [16:27] (medium or below) [16:27] :) [16:27] On the specs side... [16:27] Hm, wait [16:27] Maverick bugs affecting server, in other teams: [16:27] Bug 563916 - [details.so] No prompt for [S]kip or [M]anual recovery on server boot [16:27] Launchpad bug 563916 in plymouth (Ubuntu Maverick) "[details.so] No prompt for [S]kip or [M]anual recovery on server boot" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/563916 [16:27] This one is targeted to 10.04.2 as well [16:28] would be nice to fix in Maverick, but I suspect it's getting late [16:28] ttx, what's the outlook for the fix? [16:28] it's in the hands of the Foundations team, I think Colin spent one of his remaining cycle on it [16:29] cjwatson: ^ [16:29] * ttx will talk specs in the mean time. [16:30] Progress for the beta subcycle is at http://people.canonical.com/~pitti/workitems/maverick/canonical-server-ubuntu-10.10-beta.html [16:30] Beta-milestoned specs status: [16:30] server-maverick-upstart-conversion (0%): not completed in time for BetaFreeze. Underlying bug being fixed, those can be postponed to Natty. [16:30] server-maverick-uec-testing (40%): Most work items for beta testing week, should be completed in time [16:30] server-maverick-daily-vcs (50%): One work item left, on track (can be completed during freeze) [16:30] server-maverick-workitemtracker (64%): On track (can be completed during freeze) [16:31] server-maverick-community (67%): One work item left (assigned to jcastro) [16:31] server-maverick-papercuts (67%): One retrospective work item left, on track (can be completed during freeze) [16:31] server-maverick-uds-cloud-loadbalancing (75%): One work item left, on track (can be completed during freeze) [16:31] server-maverick-puppet-bootstrap (83%): One work item left, on track (can be completed during freeze) [16:31] skaet: current status is that it's awaiting feedback from the patch submitter on a question from upstream [16:31] server-maverick-cloud-images-sans-cloud (88%): One optional work item left, on track (can be completed during freeze) [16:31] The others are complete. [16:31] I'll move it forward if I have to, but was hoping to let the patch submitter do that since that's more economical of our resources [16:31] cjwatson, thanks. [16:31] Other specs status: [16:32] server-maverick-hadoop-pig (0%): 3 work items (2 in progress), can all be completed during freeze [16:32] server-maverick-isotesting (0%): On track (work starts next week!) [16:32] server-maverick-uec-eucalyptus-next (58%): Will require another eucalyptus upload (BetaFreezeException) [16:32] skaet: ^ [16:32] server-maverick-dailytriage (63%): On track (just a tracking spec) [16:32] server-maverick-uds-seed-review (93%): One work item left, on track (can be completed during freeze) [16:32] ttx, ack. will talk to robbiew [16:33] skaet: let's say that freezeexceptions for eucalyptus have been quite common in the past :) [16:33] Looking at it from a spillover/postponed perspective: [16:33] The server-maverick-qa-workflow spec was postponed due to work on eucalyptus blocking the QA resource [16:33] Some work items were postponed in server-maverick-community, server-maverick-uec-liveusb and server-maverick-hypervisor [16:33] heh. Thanks for the context. ;) [16:33] Some work items in server-maverick-uds-seed-review were remilestoned to maverick release [16:33] All work items in server-maverick-uec-liveusb were remilestoned to maverick release [16:33] That's all, thanks for your patience. [16:33] Questions ? [16:34] will upstart-conversion make it for release? [16:35] upstart-conversion is a process, not a destination I feel. [16:35] no, I think it should be postponed to natty. It's work in progress anyway [16:35] yes. [16:35] cool. [16:35] so those specific scripts were nominated because... [16:35] there was some issue making lo unavailable in time for some legacy init scripts to behave properly [16:35] that issue was fixed, so it's "less pressing" [16:36] thanks. makes sense. [16:36] and at that point, adding them is more a nuisance [16:36] given how close we are to release, and how critical an upstart script can be [16:36] I'm just waiting for jiboumans to be back to confirm the punting. [16:37] thanks ttx. :) [16:37] * ttx bows. [16:37] lol [16:37] [TOPIC] Desktop team [16:37] New Topic: Desktop team [16:37] hi [16:37] [LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/ReleaseStatus [16:37] [LINK] http://people.canonical.com/~pitti/workitems/maverick/canonical-desktop-team.html [16:37] [LINK] http://people.canonical.com/~pitti/workitems/maverick/canonical-desktop-team-ubuntu-10.10-beta.html [16:37] LINK received: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/ReleaseStatus [16:37] LINK received: http://people.canonical.com/~pitti/workitems/maverick/canonical-desktop-team.html [16:38] LINK received: http://people.canonical.com/~pitti/workitems/maverick/canonical-desktop-team-ubuntu-10.10-beta.html [16:38] Work items summary: [16:38] We are on track for beta and maverick [16:38] Week work summary: [16:38] * quite some bug fixing done [16:38] * unity and dx weekly updates went it [16:38] * chrisccoulson spent time on getting the "sending crashes directly to upstream" working and on getting the firefox4 builds going [16:38] * xorg got some updates still [16:38] * kenvandine sorted with twitter how we can get gwibber to work with the coming authentification changes [16:38] * lot of ui tweaking rush and updates just before the ui freeze start [16:38] [16:38] Questions for beta: [16:38] * the GNOME 2.32 beta tarballs are due on monday, can we get those uploaded for beta or not? [16:38] * firefox 3.6.9 is ready for upload with the fix for sending crashes directly to upstream, not langpacks change required, can we upload today or should that go after beta? [16:38] * banshee by default on UNE is really late, the version using udev will have it first tarball next week and it has new depends (one being in universe, one not packaged yet), is there a way we can still do that change for maverick after beta (it's UNE only)? [16:38] [16:38] (I will give the remaining summary and bugs once those are sorted) [16:39] robbiew, cjwatson, thoughts? [16:39] I guess for GNOME we can do the "just upload and people will review and decide" [16:40] heh, true... [16:40] if those go after beta that's ok [16:40] the firefox upload should go in pre-beta [16:40] I think [16:40] I would like to get firefox 3.6.9 in though, that would give us testing and make the crash reports work with upstream which is a real win [16:40] +1 [16:40] ok, great [16:41] skaet, no objection? [16:41] +1 [16:41] thanks [16:41] I guess we can sort the banshee one next week when didrocks (our UNE maintainer) is back [16:41] * skaet thinks more testing with beta the better..... [16:41] it's not really blocking beta [16:41] I just wanted to mention it [16:41] seb128: agree on waiting on banshee decision [16:42] ok [16:42] should I continue with the remaining bits? [16:42] [ACTION] discuss with didrocks banshee on UNE [16:42] ACTION received: discuss with didrocks banshee on UNE [16:42] seb128, yes please. [16:42] one comment [16:42] Worth noting that software-center still use a ppa rather than extras.ubuntu.com which is blocked on being set up by I.S, changing the archive to use should not be an issue but might be worth knowing [16:42] [16:42] not sure if that's an issue or not or if foundation, mvo are tracking that [16:43] I though I would mention it since we have remaining beta work items for those [16:43] [16:43] other bugs from the agenda: [16:43] * bug 16492: changed to low, that's basically a wishlist and not a maverick milestoned issue (was changed last week, why is it still listed? do you disagree with the change?) [16:43] * bug 329898: bug assigned to our printing maintainer and under investigation, could be due to ibus [16:43] * bug 522538: bug assigned to the gwibber maintainer for investigation [16:43] Launchpad bug 16492 in gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu Maverick) "Mouse pointer should disappear when keyboard is in use and mouse isn't" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/16492 [16:43] Launchpad bug 329898 in hplip (Ubuntu Maverick) "The HP 1018 printer not work out of the box if used non-US locale" [High,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/329898 [16:43] Launchpad bug 522538 in desktopcouch "gwibber-service crashed with error in connect()" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/522538 [16:43] * bug 575160: universe bug assigned to a community member, is there any reason it's on the desktop team list? [16:43] * bug 602899: bug assigned to our xorg maintainer who thinks it might be fixed in the current version, needs confirmation from the submitter [16:43] * bug 603507: not really a blocker since it's not an issue for unity out of the debug mode and there is a workaround, I've set it to low [16:43] Launchpad bug 575160 in seamonkey (Ubuntu Maverick) "seamonkey 2.0 crashes with 'RenderBadPicture' diagnostics" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/575160 [16:43] Launchpad bug 602899 in xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu Maverick) "[gm45] Xserver crash" [High,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/602899 [16:43] Launchpad bug 603507 in clutter-gtk-0.10 (Ubuntu Maverick) "[intel] clutter views not updated correctly with the new clutter " [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/603507 [16:43] * bug 610600: the issue is being investigated and discussed with upstream, it's better in maverick but we don't really have the competence in the team to work on it directly [16:43] * bug 615549: needs input from Keybuk or somebody who knows about upstart [16:43] * bug 616023: nvidia binary driver issues, jockey workaround it for now and we will get the update case fixed for maverick as well [16:43] Launchpad bug 610600 in gstreamer0.10 (Ubuntu Maverick) "Serious video performance regression in cheese (2.28.1->2.30.1)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/610600 [16:43] Launchpad bug 615549 in gdm (Ubuntu Maverick) "Dell Studio XPS 13 no video" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/615549 [16:43] Launchpad bug 616023 in nvidia-graphics-drivers (Ubuntu Maverick) "nVidia card : X won't start since 1.9 update, no screens found" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/616023 [16:43] * bug 621433: is being worked by the ubuntuone team [16:43] * bug 623509: the fix is ready to uploaded with firefox 3.6.9, cf question before [16:43] Launchpad bug 621433 in ubuntuone-client (Ubuntu Maverick) "[regression] nautilus plugin does not load published file list" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/621433 [16:43] Launchpad bug 623509 in firefox (Ubuntu Maverick) "Firefox is creating empty crash reports due to ptrace restrictions" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/623509 [16:43] bug fixed on the week list: bug #623655 [16:43] bugs from the previous week fixed this week: #595555 #606728 #616515 #618945 #619858 [16:43] Launchpad bug 623655 in libubuntuone (Ubuntu Maverick) "Error prevents enabling store plugin" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/623655 [16:44] [16:44] that's it [16:44] I'm open to questions or comments ;-) [16:44] [ACTION] skaet follow up onsoftware-center using ppa rather than extras.ubuntu.com [16:44] ACTION received: skaet follow up onsoftware-center using ppa rather than extras.ubuntu.com [16:44] sorry, was writing an extremely long follow-up to 441941 ... [16:44] not sure what format you prefer for the bugs listed on the agenda [16:44] Monday might be OK, I imagine Tuesday's ISOs will be the candidates we work on? [16:44] the IRC dump doesn't seem really digest [16:45] we have a summary on our weekly wiki summary [16:45] seb128: you put the bot on his knees [16:45] davidbarth, blame whoever put the agenda list and assign all those bugs to us :p [16:46] seb128, heh... can you look at 522538 as well [16:47] bug #522538 [16:47] Launchpad bug 522538 in desktopcouch "gwibber-service crashed with error in connect()" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/522538 [16:47] skaet, it was the third one in my copied list [16:47] but I didn't put it on the wiki yet because it has been added during the day [16:47] will do that now [16:47] seb128 - ack missed it in the scan.... :( [16:48] let me know if another format would work better [16:48] I'm not sure triggering the bot for having the url and bug title is useful or noise [16:49] seb128, thanks. :) will keep with current format for now [16:49] skaet, ok [16:49] * skaet still figuring things out... [16:49] you're welcome [16:49] [TOPIC] kubuntu [16:49] New Topic: kubuntu [16:49] Riddell is offline today, so I'll cover Kubuntu. [16:49] thanks [16:49] [LINK] http://tinyurl.com/33p7vu3 - Not a lot in the way of milestoned bugs: [16:49] [LINK] https://wiki.kubuntu.org/Kubuntu/Todo - Spec status is (newly updated). We may have some FFe yet if some tasks get finished, but it won't be anything potentially disruptive. [16:49] Ubiquity KDE overaul landed yesterday. Don't have any test reports yet. [16:49] After beta is out we'll be updating KDE to 4.5.1 and qt4-x11 to 4.7.0 rc1 (we have the beta now). [16:49] Build issues on armel are finally resolved, so we should have images for beta. [16:49] LINK received: http://tinyurl.com/33p7vu3 - Not a lot in the way of milestoned bugs: [16:49] LINK received: https://wiki.kubuntu.org/Kubuntu/Todo - Spec status is (newly updated). We may have some FFe yet if some tasks get finished, but it won't be anything potentially disruptive. [16:50] First test images for kubuntu-mobile tech preview (Universe) rolled yesterday, should have them in production soon. [16:50] Questions? [16:50] The biggest uncertainy for beta is the installer. [16:51] ScottK images for mobile looked a bit big for ISO. who's going to do pruning? [16:51] skaet: I'm planning on bumping the size limit. These aren't really aimed at CD, but install via USB, so size isn't a concern. [16:52] (we did this for Kubuntu Netbook when it was a separate image) [16:52] ScottK, cool. Thanks for explanation. :) [16:52] That said, it could stand some pruning as it has too much standard desktop stuff that's not needed. [16:52] heh [16:53] ScottK, thanks! [16:53] [TOPIC] Desktop experience [16:53] New Topic: Desktop experience [16:53] hmm... anyone around, or is this still a gap? [16:54] Should be davidbarth [16:54] dbarth and i are here [16:54] oops [16:54] yes [16:54] talk to us then, dont be shy :) [16:54] cool. updates? [16:54] sure [16:54] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopExperienceTeam/MaverickReleaseStatus [16:54] contains the summary [16:55] in summary, we have 1 small missing for appmenu [16:56] a series of UIF exceptions for indicators [16:56] 1 UIF exception for unity also (couldn't get all of the artwork on time) [16:57] and (yet) another exception request for the MT integration in unity [16:57] i don't want to sound like we haven't worked during the past weeks though [16:58] davidbarth, any thoughts on bug #606052? [16:58] Launchpad bug 606052 in indicator-application (Ubuntu) "indicator-application-service crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()" [Medium,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/606052 [16:58] in particular, more than 40 bugs / tasks were closed for unity in the last 4 days (https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+milestone/2010-08-26) [16:58] * skaet likes hearing about bugs being closed. :D [16:59] none sorry, was not on my radar [16:59] but will now [16:59] davidbarth, thanks! [16:59] davidbarth: Is the Ubuntu font your issue or Ux? [17:00] i've browsed other critical bugs today, but can you send me the release meeting invite to be able to give you a more accurate report on bugs next week? [17:00] font is ux [17:00] * ScottK waits. [17:00] iainfarrell is present today for design [17:01] We raised the issue of the font with Mark on the DX call this week [17:01] [ACTION] skaet to review release meeting invite list and make sure davidbarth is on it. [17:01] ACTION received: skaet to review release meeting invite list and make sure davidbarth is on it. [17:01] he's not satisfied that we're ready to add this to the distro yet [17:01] skaet: thanks ;) [17:01] questoins for DX? [17:01] We are attetmpting to answer his concerns [17:01] I can't provide a deadline unfortunately [17:01] Ivanka has been meeting and reviewing with him [17:01] ie, i've discussed that status with seb128 this mornng to plan for the reviews necessary for landing fixes [17:01] iainfarrell: So it's still a potential FFe request for Maverick then. [17:02] ScottK: correct [17:02] worse is that I was expecting an update on conversations but their internet connection has died [17:02] so I won't get an update now until Tuesday at the earliest [17:03] Should I add this detail as a comment to the font bug? [17:03] * ScottK would think so. [17:03] ScottK will do [17:04] ianfarrell, davidbarth, thanks! [17:04] [TOPIC] user experience [17:04] New Topic: user experience [17:05] * skaet looks around... [17:05] iainfarrell: that's you again dude ;) [17:06] skaet: iainfarrell didn't get the invitation email either i guess [17:06] but looking at the blueprints that were listed in a previous email [17:06] [ACTION] skaet to make sure iainfarrel is on the invite too... [17:06] ACTION received: skaet to make sure iainfarrel is on the invite too... [17:07] Thanks skaet [17:07] the generative wallpaper one had to be postponed unfotrunately (DX could allocate ressources to work on that) [17:07] the theme enhancements are mostly complete i guess [17:08] and the papercuts are, well... bugs, so the high/critical ones are still in scope for the beta iteration i assume [17:08] davidbarth: That's correct we're just testing and will only ask to make changes for bug fixes at this stage [17:08] yes, and we're over 100 papercuts too - thanks to vish [17:08] who's not here but if you see him send our love :) [17:08] :) [17:08] * vish here o/ [17:09] any questions? [17:09] [TOPIC] ARM team [17:09] New Topic: ARM team [17:09] hohoho, thats me ! [17:09] Detailed status at: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ARMTeam/ReleaseStatus/Maverick [17:09] ... [17:09] Short summary: [17:09] * oem-config issues with the current images (Bug #616581) were fixed with the most recent ubiquity upload [17:09]