/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/08/29/#ubuntu-release.txt

ogasawaraslangasek: which kernel failed to build?  I see everything successfully build for 2.6.35-19.26.00:27
persia19.2700:28
ogasawarathere's a there's a 19.27?00:28
persiaSome large number of udebs got deleted, so a no-change upload was attemtped to restore them...00:28
ogasawaraso we now need a 19.28?00:29
persiahttps://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/2.6.35-19.2700:29
persiaRight, and slangasek wanted an explanantion of why 19.27 completely failed to work00:29
ogasawaraI never uploaded a 19.27 so I 'm not sure where that even came from00:30
persia(maybe more stuff ought be automatically calculated from the changelog entry or something)00:30
persiaChangelog is on that LP page.00:30
persiahttp://launchpadlibrarian.net/54532084/linux_2.6.35-19.26_2.6.35-19.27.diff.gz is the diff00:30
* persia suspects most of the debian/control changes were unexpected by the uploader00:31
ogasawaraok, gimme a few minutes to get the ABI in order and I'll upload a 19.2800:32
persiaIs there any documentation on what needs doing to allow no-change uploads in the future?  It's a rare need, but sometimes critical for release milestones (like this time)00:34
ogasawarapersia: basically the ABI directory within the kernel needed to be bumped to the previous upload, ie 2.6.35-19.26 when 2.6.35-19.27 was uploaded.00:35
ogasawaraI suspect it was still at 2.6.25-19.25 and thus failed the ABI checks00:35
ogasawaras/2.6.25/2.6.35/00:36
persiaRight.  I think that's the bit of information slangasek was requesting (although cleaning up and uploading -19.28 would be much appreciated)00:37
ogasawarayep, just want to get our git tree to match and will upload -19.2800:37
persiaThank you.00:38
persiaCould someone accept that please?  Blocks d-i, which blocks beta for some architectures,00:44
ogasawaraAh seems slangasek did a 2.6.25-19.28 as well.  So either the one he did or I did should be good to accept.01:15
persiaHis is also ABI clean this time?01:17
ogasawarapersia: should be, according to his changelog and a quick scan of the diff01:18
persiaHm.  Wonder why the bot didn't report it.01:20
ogasawaralooking at the timestamp it seems the bot's reported his, but not mine.01:20
persiaThat makes me all sorts of confused, because if he was preparing that whilst you were discussing it, I'd think he'd have said something :)01:21
ogasawaramaybe he was head down getting it done.01:22
ogasawarano worries either way.01:22
persiayeah01:23
persianow just needs an archive-admin around quick enough to take advantage of the relatively quiescent buildds.01:23
* ogasawara is going to cook some dinner. I'll check back in a bit to make sure everything is good.01:29
micahgis anyone available to push firefox through unapproved?04:23
slangasekogasawara: thanks, accepting yours so I don't cause even further skew from git07:29
slangasekmicahg: I'll have a look07:30
micahgslangasek: thanks07:31
asacanyone here? is there a linux-meta-linaro package in the queue?14:25
asacplease let it in if so ... the omap meta package isnt installable atm and linaro images fail ;)14:25
asacgratias14:26
micahgslangasek: any luck with Firefox?16:35
stgraberpushed a new edubuntu-artwork package, we'd appreciate having it for beta but it's not critical (fixes our splash and icon theme)18:48
stgrabersomething that really should go in though is that ltsp package I uploaded yesterday or beta won't have a working LTSP in Ubuntu Alternate18:49
stgraber(as in, users will get a d-i red screen during the install)18:50
ScottKstgraber: Did you see my question about the po file changes in the ltsp upload?23:18

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!