[01:48] quadrapassel will not start in xubuntu when alt 386 is installed [03:21] IdleOne: sup? [03:22] I was telling cyphermox to ping you about changing the topic because I had noticed you were the last to do it but nhandle r took care of it === ara_ is now known as ara [07:19] good morning all! [07:45] good morning ara [07:55] morning alourie [07:59] morning === CieD is now known as Ciemon [15:51] is somebody else not getting the language selection on boot with kubuntu alt 386? [15:51] the Kubuntu people asked me not to show that [15:52] bug 608746 [15:52] Launchpad bug 608746 in gfxboot-theme-ubuntu (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "Kubuntu Maverick CD Boot Changes (affects: 1) (heat: 95)" [Wishlist,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/608746 [15:52] the inconsistency bugs me, but not enough to argue about it [15:53] cjwatson, right that's why i was asking since the others alt images are showing it [15:53] but if they decided that, it's ok i guess [15:53] thanks cjwatson [16:08] ara: morning. [16:10] hey primes2h [16:10] ara: Installing Maverick Beta in Virtualbox I have some text alignment issue in Ubiquity due to the 640x480 fixed resolution. [16:11] primes2h, can you share a screenshot? [16:11] ara: I didn't try with 800x600 on a normal installation. [16:11] ara: [16:11] yes [16:11] primes2h: Is it in the slideshow? (E.g. bug 627623) [16:11] Launchpad bug 627623 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "text in installer slideshow overruns edge of panel (affects: 2) (heat: 10)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/627623 [16:12] if it is in the slideshow, they are working on it, but it is not going to be fixed in beta [16:13] fader_: Sure. That's the one. [16:13] Cool :) As ara says, it won't be fixed for beta but it will for release [16:15] fader_: Great. That's another important one that should be fixed. bug #589204 [16:15] Launchpad bug 589204 in evolution (Ubuntu) "Evolution Setup Assistant dialog too large for netbook screens (affects: 2) (heat: 48)" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/589204 [16:15] primes2h: +1; that one's been making me cry for a while :) [16:16] fader_: eheh [16:16] me too :) [16:18] Okay, can not reproduce the static IP bug I filed. Blame it on fatigue last night. === yofel_ is now known as yofel [17:33] fader_: btw, there is also this unpleasant bug #628159 (since Lucid though but reported now) in Ubiquity. [17:33] Launchpad bug 628159 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Some ubiquity slideshow titles goes (smaller) to a new line (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/628159 [17:34] but you probably didn't face it because the language ;-) === smb is now known as smb-afk [17:39] primes2h: Indeed, that's ugly [17:44] * ara takes a quick break === cking_ is now known as cking [18:58] fader_: confirmed bug 628221 on resizing [18:59] Launchpad bug 628221 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Partitioner shows Xubuntu as "Ubuntu Maverick" (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/628221 [18:59] charlie-tca: Thanks! [19:00] no, thank you. I never saw the Ubuntu side until I read the report [19:00] We should have a competition to see who can file the most ISO bugs and who can get the most important one! :P [19:00] heh [19:00] took me all night to find just one, and then it was already filed [19:01] Heh, yeah I hate that... whenever I find a really juicy one, someone else has already filed it every time :) [19:05] fader_: sorry... you can get it this time since I'm not able to do much at the moment... [19:05] I'll check with you before filing important ones ;-) [19:06] bladernr_: Heh, cop out :P [19:24] xubuntu 386 desktop is failing in hardware, passing in VBox [19:25] burned a new cd to try again [19:25] Hmm, yeah it worked for me in vbox :/ [19:25] That's concerning [19:25] might be the cd [19:25] * fader_ crosses his fingers. [19:25] couldn't even boot to the live environment with it without errors [19:27] Yuck. [19:27] well, crap. Erased the wrong drive [19:28] live cd worked this time [19:28] Heheh [19:28] charlie-tca: Sorry about your drive though :( [19:28] The joys of one too many drives, huh? [19:28] me too, sorry [19:29] I guess if the image works, it will be fine. I can always reinstall again [19:31] charlie-tca: well, that's ok, you can just restore it from backup, yeah? ;-) [19:31] heh [19:31] well.... [19:31] yeah... [19:32] bladernr_: That's mean, dude [19:32] :P [19:32] me too [19:32] Backups are those things we all tell *other* people to make [19:32] oh, the correct answer is "sure" [19:32] because it could never happen to me [19:32] that's why I have lots of drive space, right? [19:32] exactly! [19:32] heheh... and if you run out again, you can just make more ;-) [19:33] I am so good, I have room for backups on two different systems, just so I don't lose anything [19:33] hmm, Maybe it is time to use that space now [19:33] heh... why not. not like you're going to run out or anything [19:34] Well, not any more at least === cking is now known as cking-afk [19:56] Well, installing from software center is confusing now. It never says "install". How many will know "Use this source" means install this application? [20:00] Oh, it doesn't. First you authorize the source, then you have to say install [20:01] charlie-tca: It's like authorizing a nuclear strike... you have to have two people click the mouse at exactly the same time [20:01] :) [20:01] Starting to think so [20:01] Good thing it was simplified [20:05] Oh, well, I crashed it anyway [20:05] Hehe [20:06] You have the touch of death [20:06] heh [20:06] I learned from the best [20:20] Oh, nice... I was holding off on a testcase because it was marked as started, but it's a spammer: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/result/4500/117 [20:20] :( [20:21] The best part is they actually made an account to do that :( [20:22] That's neat! :-( [20:22] Maybe ara can delete that one? [20:22] Yeah, I am hoping someone can [20:23] And the account [20:23] I can do that [20:23] But not until I copy that URL down in case I ever need a reebok jersey! Where else can I find one online? [20:29] fader_, :D [20:29] fader_, sorry, deleted! :D [20:29] Oh noes! My jersey! [20:29] ara: Thanks :) [20:30] I hope that that does not start being something common... [20:31] Me too... that would be very annoying [20:31] +1 [20:31] It would be much worse if they marked it as something other than 'started' [20:31] That's my big concern from this [20:32] hmm, true. You have to check each test to see if it really got done. [20:33] Yeah. I can't think of a good way of dealing with that, short of having more stringent requirements to join the ISO testing. Which would be sad :( [20:36] yup, but might be needed in the long run. [20:51] OK, guys, it is 10pm here, I am going to call it a day [20:51] ara: Good night! [20:51] happy testing everybody! [20:51] \o/ [20:51] :D