[00:21] <lifeless> bryceh: what was up ?
[00:25] <lifeless> rockstar/thumper: can I get you to look at a small diff for me: 1 liner .
[00:25] <lifeless> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~lifeless/launchpad/oops/revision/11435
[00:25] <rockstar> lifeless, ugh, loggerhead.
[00:25] <lifeless> I loaded it for you already , should be fast
[00:25] <rockstar> lifeless, why are we making the timeout bigger?
[00:25] <lifeless> because that number is in milliseconds
[00:25] <lifeless> in a test
[00:26] <rockstar> lifeless, why are you only changing the test?
[00:26] <rockstar> Is this a testfix?
[00:26] <lifeless> for a branch I'm trying to merge
[00:26] <lifeless> what happening is that this test, which is independent of all my changes, is breaking
[00:27] <bryceh> lifeless, mind reviewing https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~bryceharrington/launchpad/lp-617679-db/+merge/34321 when you get a chance?
[00:27] <lifeless> hmm, I might dig deeper
[00:27] <lifeless> rockstar: thanks for asking those questions
[00:27] <lifeless> rockstar: it passes locally
[00:28] <lifeless> rockstar: which is extremely frustrating
[00:28] <rockstar> lifeless, yeah, I suspect there's a timing issue somewhere.
[00:28] <lifeless> what it does
[00:28] <lifeless> is sleeps for 0.1 second while the time taken is < that the soft reques ttimeout
[00:28] <lifeless> the failure is in
[00:29] <lifeless> the report() below - it shows a soft timeout
[00:30] <lifeless> but its expecting a hard timeout not a soft one, presumably because the soft timeout is higher than the hard one
[00:31] <lifeless> rockstar: if its ok with you, I'll try this change
[00:31] <lifeless> rockstar: and if it works chalk it up to terrible-testing-approaches
[00:31] <lifeless> rockstar: if it doesn't I'll dig deep
[00:32] <rockstar> lifeless, I defer to your judgment then.
[00:32] <lifeless> rockstar: thanks!
[06:34] <lifeless> https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~lifeless/launchpad/bug-618372/+merge/34383
[06:34] <lifeless> ^ that branch is a 2 liner; if anyone wants to eyeball it
[06:38] <mwhudson> lifeless: done
[06:50] <lifeless> thanks
[06:50] <lifeless> I have another
[06:50] <lifeless> but I'll do that after dinner
[12:12] <bac> hi noodles775, i have a MP for review: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~bac/launchpad/bug-154587/+merge/34401 .  i need to go away for a bit to eat breakfast, though.
[13:01] <jtv> noodles775, would you mind this one on your queue while I'm already EOD?  https://code.launchpad.net/~jtv/launchpad/recife-diverge/+merge/34407
[13:12] <noodles775> bac, jtv: sure
[13:12] <jtv> noodles775: fantastic, thanks
[13:13] <wgrant> noodles775: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~wgrant/launchpad/ppa-key-name/+merge/34408, if you have a few minutes.
[13:14] <noodles775> wgrant: oooh, nice easy one :)
[13:15] <wgrant> Indeed.
[13:19] <noodles775> wgrant: approved and ec2 landing.
[13:20] <wgrant> noodles775: Thanks.
[13:21] <StevenK> I still maintain that wgrant should use ec2 test. :-P
[13:21] <noodles775> With a paid-for account?
[13:21] <wgrant> StevenK: I can use it... it just can't land.
[13:22] <wgrant> noodles775: And it wasn't really formally reviewed before.
[13:22] <StevenK> wgrant: 'ec2 test'
[13:22] <noodles775> wgrant: I know, I still treated it as if unreviewed :)
[13:23] <wgrant> StevenK: Hmmm?
[13:24] <StevenK> wgrant: 'ec2 test' runs the tests and mails you the results, 'ec2 land' runs the tests, and lands it if the tests passed
[13:25] <wgrant> StevenK: Yes, but there's not much point me running ec2 test.
[13:25] <StevenK> wgrant: IE, you can quite happily run 'ec2 test' and then ask someone to submit it to PQM, but meh
[13:25] <wgrant> People generally won't.
[13:29] <StevenK> wgrant: It isn't fair when you respond to my teasing with rationale.
[13:29] <wgrant> :(
[15:07] <leonardr> salgado, take a look at http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/487261/ and hopefully we can wrap up this branch
[15:08] <salgado> leonardr, looks fine to me
[16:19] <EdwinGrubbs> deryck: can you do a ui review of my branch modifying bugs.lp.net/$project/+index? https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~edwin-grubbs/launchpad/bug-597738-bug-service-status/+merge/34250
[16:20] <deryck> EdwinGrubbs, yes, was just about to look at in fact.  However, I'm not a UI reviewer or UI reviewer mentee.
[16:22] <EdwinGrubbs> deryck: oh, I misread the reviewer wiki page.  If you're interested, I'm open to feedback, but don't feel like I'm waiting on you for the review.
[16:23] <EdwinGrubbs> noodles775, rockstar: can one of you do a UI review for me? https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~edwin-grubbs/launchpad/bug-597738-bug-service-status/+merge/34250
[16:23] <rockstar> EdwinGrubbs, I'll take a look.
[16:23] <EdwinGrubbs> thanks
[16:23] <deryck> EdwinGrubbs, I'll just glance at the page since it's bugs related
[16:23] <deryck> and leave ui to rockstar :-)
[16:24] <noodles775> Thanks rockstar. Might be worth seeing if henninge wants a first look too (although he's probably EODing soon like me).
[16:24] <rockstar> Oh, I thought he would have EOD'd.
[16:24] <henninge> rockstar: I can have a look.
[16:24] <rockstar> henninge, oh yay! Yeah, take a look.
[16:28] <rockstar> EdwinGrubbs, what? No screenshot?!  :)
[16:28] <henninge> Yes, I am a bit disappointed myself ... ;)
[16:29]  * henninge just branched
[16:30] <henninge> rocketfuel-get ...
[17:00] <allenap> rockstar: Could you review a snippet for me please? It's a workaround for bug 628762 so I can get lp:~allenap/launchpad/cache-experiment-roll-out landed. http://paste.ubuntu.com/487315/
[17:00] <_mup_> Bug #628762: propertycache adaption failures in test suite <Launchpad Foundations:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/628762>
[17:01] <allenap> rockstar: The merge proposal for the whole branch is at https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~allenap/launchpad/cache-experiment-roll-out/+merge/33542
[17:02] <rockstar> allenap, I suspect I need to look at the whole branch.
[17:04] <allenap> rockstar: The whole branch is pretty huge; there are a lot of mechanical changes. I think you'll be able to understand it if you look at propertycache.py, propertycache.txt and bug 628762.
[17:04] <_mup_> Bug #628762: propertycache adaption failures in test suite <Launchpad Foundations:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/628762>
[17:04] <rockstar> allenap, I'd be happier of you had lifeless review that.
[17:04] <allenap> rockstar: Okay.
[17:05] <allenap> rockstar: Can I put myself in the queue for a couple of tarmac branches then? One, lp:~allenap/tarmac/votes-needed-plugin, is for the benefit of Landscape (though it's generally useful), and the other is just a clean up.
[17:07] <rockstar> allenap, I'm happy to take some Tarmac branches, yes.
[17:07] <allenap> rockstar: Cool, thanks.
[17:26] <jcsackett> rockstar: when you're able to get to it, here's the MP. https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~jcsackett/launchpad/deprecate-remaining-official-bools/+merge/34436
[17:29] <henninge> rockstar: done
[17:29] <henninge> *now* I am EOD
[17:29] <rockstar> henninge, have a good night!
[17:29] <henninge> thanks ;)
[17:31] <rockstar> jcsackett, it looks like your branch has conflicts.
[17:31] <jcsackett> rockstar: blast, you're right, i forgot to merge in devel.
[17:31] <jcsackett> one sec, sorry for the bother.
[17:40] <jcsackett> rockstar: should be pushed up momentarily.
[17:44] <rockstar> allenap, didn't you already have a thing class?
[18:49] <abentley> rockstar, could you please review https://code.launchpad.net/~abentley/launchpad/recipe-interfaces/+merge/34453 ?
[19:02] <abentley> rockstar, could you please review https://code.launchpad.net/~abentley/launchpad/permit-commands/+merge/34456 ?
[20:03] <rockstar> abentley, on it.
[20:11] <abentley> rockstar, could you please review https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~abentley/launchpad/safe-v3/+merge/34465 ?
[20:11] <rockstar> abentley, add it to the backlog and I'll get to it.
[20:48] <leonardr> salgado, take a wild guess what's in this diff: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/487423/
[20:50] <rockstar> abentley, these branches were all pipes, correct?
[20:52] <salgado> leonardr, heh.  seems fine to me
[20:53] <abentley> rockstar, yes, but not all the same pipeline.  The last one is in a pipeline with the build-outside-chroot one.
[20:56] <rockstar> abentley, yeah, I think there might have been a hiccup in setting a dependent branch somewhere.
[20:56] <abentley> rockstar, something wrong?
[20:56] <rockstar> Was permit commands related to the recipe-interfaces pipe?
[20:56] <abentley> rockstar, yes.
[20:57] <rockstar> abentley, I think the dependent branch didn't get set right on permit-commands
[21:00] <abentley> rockstar, I think you're right.
[21:00] <rockstar> abentley, it would be great if you could fix it.
[21:01] <abentley> rockstar, I can't fix it without creating a new merge proposal.
[21:01] <rockstar> abentley, would you mind?  I assume this diff is much smaller that way.
[21:03] <abentley> rockstar, ah.  I thought you'd already reviewed that one.  sure.
[21:06] <abentley> rockstar, corrected version: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~abentley/launchpad/permit-commands/+merge/34476
[21:09] <rockstar> abentley, thanks
[21:17] <abentley>  rockstar, could you please review https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~abentley/launchpad/allow-0.3/+merge/34478 ?
[21:18] <rockstar> abentley, you're an ANIMAL!
[21:18] <abentley> rockstar, they're all small.
[21:24] <jcsackett> rockstar: branch was updated per your remarks.
[21:24] <rockstar> jcsackett, great, I'll take a look.
[21:24] <jcsackett> thanks.
[23:50] <thumper> mwhudson: feel like a review?
[23:50] <thumper> mwhudson: it is a codehosting type xmlrpc one
[23:50] <thumper> just your cuppa tea