[01:00] <Edgan> Can someone tell me if a new kernel went into lucid-proposed today, then got pushed to release? I have a bug report where it is mentioned it would go in to proposed in a few hours, and it was 13 hours ago.
[02:30] <crimsun_> Edgan: was uploaded;      linux | 2.6.32-25.43 | lucid-proposed | source
[02:33] <crimsun_> Edgan: also, new binaries were accepted, so yes, they're available according to LP
[02:50] <Edgan> crimsun_: yeah, apt-get dist-upgrade wasn't working earlier. I saw the kernel in the pool, but the repo at least at the time wasn't regenerated
[02:50] <Edgan> crimsun_: I ended up downloading it by hand
[13:24] <\sh> moins
[13:26] <\sh> I don't know how long until Ubuntu 10.04.2 but please consider bug #628776 . It helps us server guys with HP nc511i emulex dual port 10GB cards to test lucid (and also maverick) with no nightmares ;)
[13:26] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 628776 in linux (Ubuntu) "HP NC511i Driver (be2net and be2scsi) is missing in kernel module udebs (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/628776
[13:32] <tgardner> ack
[13:33] <\sh> tgardner, thx a lot :) 
[14:49] <brot> i am trying to bisect a bug in the kernel, and need to compile my own kernel packages to do so. running "make-kpkg --initrd --append-to-version=bisect1 kernel-image kernel-headers" for the vanilla kernel sources fails with:http://paste.ubuntuusers.de/398863/  . can someone tell me what i am doing wrong?
[14:50] <abogani> brot, Using make-pkg.
[15:24] <brot> abogani: what do you mean?
[15:26] <tgardner> ogasawara, need to bounce tangerine.
[15:38] <abogani> brot, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/BuildYourOwnKernel
[15:40] <brot> abogani: the kernel testers want the testing to happen with the vanilla kernel, i think
[15:40] <abogani> brot: So go with vanilla build procedure.
[15:44] <brot> i used that https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Kernel/Compile
[15:44] <tgardner> abogani, brot: there is a debian packaging target in the mainline kernel makefile, 'make deb-pkg'
[15:46] <brot> and make-kpkg is deprecated?
[15:46] <tgardner> yeah, its an external package that isn't really well supported anymore
[15:46] <brot> i see.
[15:47] <brot> thanks for the information tgardner :)
[15:49] <tgardner> smb, sconklin: will one of you act on Eric's Lucid mvl-dove pull request soon so I can get Maverick updated?
[15:50] <tgardner> ogra, are you ready to have ti-omap4 uploaded again?
[15:50] <sconklin> I can get it
[15:50] <smb> sconklin, remember to do the rebase while you are at it
[15:51] <sconklin> yes
[15:51] <ogasawara> tgardner: go ahead (if you haven't already)
[15:52] <tgardner> ogasawara, bouncing
[15:53] <cking> bounced
[15:54] <apw>  cking overheated ?
[15:54] <tgardner> ogasawara, how are you building such that you have all of these stalled processes?
[15:54] <cking> apw, nope, just watchin' tangerine rebooting
[15:54] <ogasawara> tgardner: hrm, just using the kernel team build scrips
[15:55] <smb> weird I use tangerine the same occasionally. tgardner did I have stalled stuff there?
[15:55] <tgardner> ogasawara, seems like whenever I check there are a zillion compiles suspended, especiallye arly in the AM when I know you're not around
[15:56] <tgardner> smb, I didn't notice any from you
[15:56] <smb> I only had that on some of the porters that they seemed to stay in the screen session even when the build was over. Have not seen that on intel
[15:57] <tgardner> ogasawara, so you didn't think you had any builds pending?
[15:57] <ogasawara> tgardner: nope, they'd all finished
[15:57] <tgardner> wierd
[15:57] <cking> apw, the lucid kernel did seem to overheat less yesterday than maverick
[15:58] <ogasawara> tgardner: I've haven't even actually built anything on tangerine for a few days
[15:58] <cking> tgardner, tangerine usable again?
[15:58] <tgardner> cking, its up
[15:58] <cking> ta
[15:59] <tgardner> ogasawara, you gonna hoover up these MT patches today?
[15:59] <ogasawara> tgardner: yep
[15:59] <ogasawara> tgardner: hoping to get everything applied and uploaded today once the official Beta announcement goes out.
[15:59]  * tgardner enjoys annoying people sometimes
[16:18]  * ogasawara bails for appt.  back in a bit.
[16:33] <ogra> tgardner, go for it :)
[16:33] <tgardner> ogra, ack
[16:33] <ogra> thanks for asking, i would have asked :)
[16:34] <tgardner> ogra, done
[16:34] <ogra> thanks a lot
[16:35] <brot> tgardner: does the "make deb-pkg" also build an initrd?
[16:36] <tgardner> brot, dunno, I haven't messed with it that much. likely not
[16:43] <abogani> brot, AFAIK Initramfs should be generated at install time.
[16:49] <maks_> with recent initramfs-tools yes it does it.
[17:10] <tgardner> kernel.ubuntu.com (aka zinc) is rebooting in ~20 minutes
[17:11] <JFo> looks like they are about to reboot zinc
[17:12] <JFo> tgardner, ogasawara smb ^^
[17:12]  * tgardner looks quizzically at JFo
[17:13]  * smb does not care for zinc at least for the next 30 minutes
[17:13] <JFo> heh
[17:13] <JFo> tgardner, see pm
[17:14] <JFo> lol
[17:14]  * JFo is a comedy of errors today
[17:14] <JFo> s/comedy/tragedy/
[17:46] <mpoirier> hey lag !
[17:57] <apw> git request-pull
[18:03] <lag> mpoirier: Hi Mathieu 
[18:04] <mpoirier> it's ok friend, andy sorted me out.
[18:04] <lag> np
[18:54] <tgardner> sconklin, what is the name of the xfs test suite you've been running?
[18:59]  * tgardner lunches
[18:59] <smb> tgardner, xfstests-dev
[19:01] <smb> tgardner, Coincidentally I made a debian package for it today: https://launchpad.net/~stefan-bader-canonical/+archive/ppa
[19:04] <cking> smb, something we could use for M+1 in universe perchance?
[19:05] <smb> cking, Either that or start to have a kernel-ppa/kernel-test PPA to collect those sorts of things
[19:05] <tgardner> smb, thanks
[19:06] <cking> smb, whatever ;-)
[19:06] <smb> The upstream code is a bit lazy in installing everything into /var/lib which seems a bit dirty. Nothing that cannot be fixed I guess, but this first version is just a quick packaging attempt
[19:08]  * cking calls it a day
[19:10] <smb> tgardner, I hope it packaged the right README file with the instructions if not there should be a reference to the upstream git in the package header
[19:11] <ogasawara> JFo: you send the Triage summit announcement? (/me hasn't seen anything, but maybe I missed it?)  just mainly wanting to know if I can close that work item.
[19:21] <pgraner> ogasawara, how are we looking for beta?
[19:21]  * pgraner notes burndown charts don't render correctly right now in FF for some reason
[19:22] <ogasawara> pgraner: good, the remaining beta work items are not release critical (more investigative tasks in nature) so I've re-targeted them to the final maverick milestone
[19:23] <pgraner> ogasawara, cool, thx
[19:23] <ogasawara> pgraner: we're still below our overall burndown chart - http://people.canonical.com/~pitti/workitems/maverick/canonical-kernel-team.html
[19:23] <pgraner> ogasawara, yea, I need to figure out why FF won't render properly
[19:24] <ogasawara> pgraner: the beta one was lookin funky for me
[19:25] <pgraner> ogasawara, ok so its not just me
[19:26] <ogasawara> pgraner: yah for me the beta bar graph is tiny and not at all proportional to the burn down line
[19:33] <ogasawara> tgardner: rsalveti has 2 patches he wants applied to the ti-omap4 branch ("[PATCH 0/2] Adding LED support for Panda").  You'd Ack'ed them, want me to go ahead and apply/push them or did you?
[19:40] <tgardner> ogasawara, uh, I thought they were for the master branch.
[19:41] <tgardner> but, yeah. go ahead and apply where appropriate
[19:41] <ogasawara> tgardner: ack
[19:47]  * smb goes eod
[19:49] <JFo> ogasawara, no, I am having some trouble sending some e-mails but not all... that one is one of the ones I can't seem to get sent
[19:49] <JFo> tracking the issue down now
[19:49] <ogasawara> JFo: ack
[19:50] <JFo> apologies
[19:50] <JFo> been trying to find the issue the last 3 days now
[19:50] <ogasawara> JFo: I knew you were having some email issues so was thinking that had something to do with it
[19:51] <JFo> yeah, I have one idea right now what it might be
[19:51] <JFo> if it isn't that then I'll have to send individual mails to the lists to get it out
[20:21]  * jjohansen -> lunch
[20:47] <sconklin-afk> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/airlied/drm-2.6.git;a=commit;h=0d9958b18e10d7426d94cc3dd024920a40db3ee2
[20:50] <ogasawara> Sarvatt: sconklin just pointed me to the above patch and mentioned you'd actually been tracking it a bit
[20:50] <ogasawara> Sarvatt: just curious if there were any open LP bugs related to that patch?
[20:51] <ogasawara> Sarvatt: I see it's been CC'd for upstream stable, but may be something we want to pull in pre-stable
[20:52] <ogasawara> Sarvatt: just wanted to see if I could get a bit more background info on it for justification purposes if I proposed it to the mailing list
[20:59]  * ogasawara lunch
[21:24] <Sarvatt> ogasawara: I'm sorry, xchat decided to stop notifying me that I got pinged, digging up the bugs now
[21:25] <Sarvatt> ogasawara: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.searchtext=needs-pll-quirk
[21:25] <Sarvatt> ogasawara: the pull request including that commit got sent to linus earlier so it should be upstream soon, that's where I noticed it
[21:29] <ogasawara> Sarvatt: cool thanks.  I'll keep an eye on it.
[21:33] <sconklin> ogasawara: I just emailed it to us and the debian kernel folks to keep it on our radar
[21:33] <sconklin> (the pll patch info)
[21:33] <ogasawara> sconklin: cool
[21:34] <ogasawara> sconklin: was thinking I'd try to throw a test kernel together for the bugs Sarvatt noted
[21:34] <sconklin> ogasawara: that would be good for lucid, too. Nit sure I can do it today but I'll try
[22:09] <manjo> pgraner, is it correct to say 10.4 > RHEL5 (kernel) ? 
[22:10] <manjo> jjohansen, is it correct to say 10.04 (kernel) > sles10? 
[22:10] <manjo> jjohansen, sorry sles 11
[22:10] <jjohansen> manjo: no
[22:11] <manjo> 10.04 < sles 11 ? 
[22:11] <jjohansen> manjo: sles 11 is a 2.6.32 variant too
[22:11] <manjo> oh so they are the same almost 
[22:11] <jjohansen> manjo: not < or > very similar
[22:11] <vanhoof> manjo: RHEL 5 is shipping 2.6.18 + a slew of patches from various kernel revisions
[22:11] <manjo> vanhoof, right that is what I googled .... ok 
[22:12] <jjohansen> manjo: sles10 has an older kernel with a ton of patches like RHEL 5
[22:12] <jjohansen> manjo: http://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/kernel/kotd/
[22:12] <manjo> cool thanks for all the info 
[22:13] <jjohansen> that will give you all there current kernels
[22:21] <manjo> jjohansen, guess you did not see my pm ? 
[22:23] <jjohansen> manjo: sorry, was in other room trying to get Maverick to boot on a recently upgraded machine
[22:24] <manjo> jjohansen, ah yes ... thought you were ignoring me :) 
[22:24] <jjohansen> its dead, dies right after initrd, but its not the kernel as it does the same with an older working kernel
[22:25] <manjo> HDD issues ? 
[22:26] <jjohansen> manjo: nope
[22:26] <manjo> :D
[22:26] <jjohansen> something to do with maverick :(
[22:26] <sconklin> ogasawara: for that pll patch on lucid, it doesn't apply, and there's been quite a divergence so it's going to take some detailed work, and it's too late today for me to do it
[22:27] <ogasawara> sconklin: no worries, I probably won't get to doing a Maverick test build till tomorrow too
[22:27] <sconklin> I'm updating stefan and Brad today on where I am, but there's no big hurry for this. Whoever gets to it first will do it - have a good weekend!
[22:28] <jjohansen> enjoy your weekend sconklin
[22:29] <sconklin> jjohansen: thanks I'm planning to. I just love watching my kids at the con.
[22:29] <jjohansen> hehe, it should be fun