/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/09/02/#ubuntu-release.txt

cjwatsonskaet: I think we are on the path to fixes for both the Kubuntu OOM and the USB infinite loop00:39
cjwatsonit may be a slightly long night00:39
Davieyskaet, yo got mail; note it needs ack'ing by ttx .:)00:41
GrueMastercjwatson: what is the issue with kubuntu?  I don't think it affects armel, as I am currently running it on a beagleXM.00:57
cjwatsonGrueMaster: lots of plugininstall processes being spawned, using up all memory00:58
cjwatsonI don't know why it would not affect armel00:59
GrueMasterWe only run oem-install, not full ubiquity.00:59
GrueMasterI've had other issues with kubuntu, but oem-install seems to get through fine.  Nothing in the logs indicating oom messages.01:01
GrueMaster(and on a 256M system, they become noticable quickly).01:01
cjwatsonoem-config probably isn't affected, since the tarot cards seem to indicate that it's mostly to do with two parallel debconffilters01:02
cjwatsonwhich doesn't happen in oem-config01:02
GrueMasterOk.  That makes me feel a little better.  I hate repining on armel if avoidable.01:02
GrueMasterbtw:  the livecd fix for dove worked great.01:03
cjwatsoncool01:05
cjwatsonsomebody available shortly for a ubiquity review?01:45
cjwatson(Riddell volunteered on #ubuntu-installer)01:53
cjwatsonmarjo: did you see my comment about your server installation problem?01:57
cjwatson13:22 <cjwatson> marjo: regarding your server installation bug, I think it may be a recurrence of bug 227869.  Your /proc/cpuinfo may help to confirm.  If not that, then I guess it must be a kernel bug of some01:57
ubot4Launchpad bug 227869 in base-installer (Ubuntu) "Server installer should not use -server kernel for non-PAE CPU's (affects: 1) (heat: 4)" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/22786901:57
cjwatson                 kind01:57
cjwatsonso, I think the right answer here is probably an alarm to wake me up in 1.5 hours or so to do the necessary respins01:59
cjwatson$ wait-for-package ubiquity_2.3.14 && { echo kubuntu; buildlive kubuntu && for-project kubuntu cron.daily-live; echo ubuntu-netbook; buildlive ubuntu-netbook && for-project ubuntu-netbook cron.daily-live; echo kubuntu-mobile; buildlive kubuntu-mobile && for-project kubuntu-mobile cron.daily-live; echo kubuntu dvd; buildlive kubuntu-dvd && for-project kubuntu cron.dvd; }02:07
cjwatsonno alarm needed after all, but perhaps somebody could post those to the tracker as they appear?02:07
micahghi, I'm looking at bug 628558 which clearly needs an FFe, but I can't find an upstream changelog, we currently have v1.2 which is 2 yrs old and 2.4 was apparently released about 6 months ago, opinions?03:25
ubot4Launchpad bug 628558 in calendarserver (Ubuntu) "RQ: update to calendarserver v2.4 from Debian (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/62855803:25
micahgoh, the package is in universe and only has 1 rdepend03:25
ScottKmicahg: Still needs FFe, but if you can fix that, then it won't be hard to get.04:34
micahgScottK: I'm asking about the FFe :)04:35
ScottKmicahg: You still need to fill it out as best you can.04:36
ScottKIf it's totally broken to -> working to some degree that's good to know.04:36
micahgScottK: quadrispro seems to know more about it, I'll ask him if he's interested in filing the FFe, thanks04:38
ScottKOK.04:38
slangasekkubuntu, ubuntu-netbook respins posted05:00
slangasekkubuntu-mobile failed to build (again)05:36
persiaWhat broke there?  The log seems oddly truncated.05:43
slangasekno clue05:51
ScottKpersia: I don't think we ever got it to build the livefs out of Universe, so it would fail.05:57
persiaScottK, I thought you committed that change.  I wonder why NCommander was able to build some images before.06:43
persiaAnyway, probably not most critical at this time of today.06:44
ScottKpersia: He built alternates as a test.06:44
ScottKAFAIK we've yet to have a live.06:44
ScottKNot sure.06:44
persiahttp://cdimage.ubuntu.com/kubuntu-mobile/ports/daily-preinstalled/current/ is live, but not i386.  Old as well.06:45
slangasekkubuntu dvds posted06:45
persiaMaybe he'll be able to see if he has time to check backscroll.06:45
NCommanderpersia: which change?06:46
persiaNCommander, building kubuntu-mobile against universe.06:47
persiaI know the metapackage can't do that, but I thought the livefs was built that way.06:47
persia(or I'd expect to see some depedencies-cannot-be-satisfied type of error).06:47
persiaImages aren't building for mysterious reasons.06:48
NCommanderpersia: images should just build if livecd-rootfs is correct.06:48
persiaThat's what I thought, but my limits for livecd-rootfs are "it worked for my locally", which aren't necessarily a good match for what is happening.06:49
ttxMorn07:20
* ttx looks at proposed releasenote text from Daviey07:21
Davieyttx, is it ok?07:33
ttxI'm editing it07:33
ttxDaviey: as a general rule of thumb, only significant bugs are mentioned. Otherwise this document would be quite long07:33
ttx+ bugs that are significant tyo people upgrading (starting from beta)07:34
Davieyttx, ack07:35
ttxsee https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MaverickMeerkat/TechnicalOverview?action=diff&rev2=71&rev1=7007:35
ttxI dropped the two harmless ones07:36
ttxDaviey: you didn't mention bug 628055 ?07:41
ubot4Launchpad bug 628055 in eucalyptus (Ubuntu) "Instances don't go to "running" state: Security Labeling error running aa_change_profile() (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/62805507:41
Davieyttx, Yeah.. perhaps i should have07:47
Davieyttx, it seems inda abstract, and not exactly confirmed07:48
ttxDaviey: not sure, since we couldn't reproduce it07:48
ttxDaviey: ack07:48
aramorning all!08:03
araRiddell, is Kubuntu going to be respin? (has been?)08:04
Riddellara: has been08:04
araRiddell, but it is not the one in the tracker, is it?08:04
Riddellyes, 2010090208:05
araRiddell, good, thanks!08:05
* ara resyncs08:05
Riddellalthough I don't think cjwatson's mega rebuild command included kubuntu alternate and we probably do want to respin those for bug 62754908:07
ubot4Launchpad bug 627549 in ubiquity (Ubuntu Maverick) (and 1 other project) "ubiquity crashed in kubuntu oem mode (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/62754908:08
didrocksnetbook ubiquity is still crashing for me if I select Specify partitions manually (advanced). No trace in the command line. Can somebody confirms?08:11
didrocks(20100902)08:11
Riddellcheck /var/log/installer/debug and /var/log/syslog for output08:12
didrocksthanks Riddell, apparently a protection error…08:15
Riddellah, one of them08:15
didrocksara: can you add "Install (manual partitioning)" to the netbook testcase? or should I file it under " Install (entire disk)" and specify the issue?08:16
* didrocks tries ubuntu desktop to see if I can reproduce there too08:16
aradidrocks, we cannot add testcases on the fly, it is a decision made by the release team08:17
aradidrocks, you can put it someplace else and specify the issue in the comments, i.e.08:17
aradidrocks, if you can try it with ubuntu desktop that would be great08:17
didrocksara: ok, so, if I can't reproduce in the desktop CD, I'll do that08:17
didrockssure08:17
aradidrocks, thanks!08:17
didrocksyw ;)08:18
evdidrocks: I just started a manual partitioning install with Kubuntu desktop without issue.  Do let me know if you can reproduce that crash.08:33
evoh, damn08:38
evkubuntu desktop is broken.  The fix we came up with last night has a corner case.08:40
Riddellev: oh?08:40
RiddellI already did a successful install on a virtual machine08:40
evmanual partitioning triggered it for me, but I suspect it might be a timing thing08:41
ara:-(08:41
evinvestigating now08:41
RiddellI'm doing manual partitioning on a machine here, going ok so far08:41
araev, if we can identify the root cause and it is a very special case, we might release note it08:42
evsure08:42
araev, if the USB disk error is not fixed for Ubuntu desktop, I think we might release note it. What do you think? A lot of people installs with a USB key, not only netbook08:52
evwell, it's fixed, just not in any spinned CD08:53
evbut yes, I think it's most certainly worthy of a release note08:53
araev, does not the netbook edition include the fix?08:53
evit does08:54
arathat's what I thought08:54
evsorry, I misspoke08:54
didrocksev: no issue on the desktop CD for me, it's only the netbook one (under the live session), trying in the installer mode now08:55
didrocksev: FYI: http://paste.ubuntu.com/487118/08:56
Riddellkubuntu manual partitioning with oem is good here09:04
cjwatsonwe *could* respin Ubuntu desktop, but it seems to me that there are more than enough respins going on09:04
cjwatsonI'll do it if QA says to09:04
cjwatsonRiddell: you want a Kubuntu alt respin then?09:05
didrocksok, manual partition seems to fail only under the unity live, not in the installer mode09:05
* didrocks reboots once again to confirm09:05
Riddellcjwatson: not yet but now I confirmed OEM works I'd like to09:06
Riddellor you can09:06
cjwatsonon its way09:06
Riddellthanks09:06
didrocksok, I'm filing the bug for crash in manual partitionning under unity under the " Install (entire disk)" as there is nothing for it in iso.qa.ubuntu.com and I can't reproduce it in the desktop CD09:10
aradidrocks, OK, please file the bug and upload the logs to it09:10
didrocksok, filed, in fact, every option is crashing under unity09:18
didrocks(wasn't the case last alpha)09:18
cjwatsonKubuntu alternate posted09:24
araRiddell, I have installed Kubuntu OEM in a Netbook, and when finished, I get the Kubuntu Netbook interface (expected), but I don't get the "prepare for end user icon"09:25
Riddellara: yes me too, I was premature in my ticking the success box09:26
Riddellara: did you have internet access while installing?09:26
araRiddell, no, I didn't09:26
Riddellara: do you have oem-config-kde installed?09:26
* ara checks09:26
cjwatsonRiddell: I've created https://help.ubuntu.com/community/MaverickUpgrades/Kubuntu, but it still needs work that I can't really do as a non-Kubuntu-user (and I don't know what to replace 'update-notifier-kde -u' with since I see that's now in universe and there's a new notification helper).  Could you (have somebody) look over it, please?09:29
araRiddell, no, it does not have it09:29
Riddellcjwatson: yes, that's on my todo list for this morning, thanks for starting09:30
Riddellara: checking if having internet during install helps, although there's no reason why it should really09:30
Riddellara: please file a bug with logs et al09:30
araRiddell, will do09:31
araRiddell, bug against? ubiquity?09:34
Riddellyes09:35
cjwatsondidrocks: hm, so not obviously a ubiquity problem since the crash is in libglib09:36
cjwatsondidrocks: can you repeat, but with 'debug-ubiquity' on the kernel command line (or starting ubiquity with the -d option)?09:36
didrockscjwatson: yeah, I'm quite puzzled, I have also pinged unity guys09:36
didrockssure09:36
cjwatsondidrocks: that should give you more useful /var/log/installer/debug09:36
didrocksdoing now09:37
seb128didrocks, hum, crash in glib, do you have bug?09:37
cjwatsondamn, I should sort out image pre-publishing shouldn't I09:37
seb128or a stacktrace09:37
cjwatsonseb128: bug 62867209:37
ubot4Launchpad bug 628672 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Crash of ubiquity under unity (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Critical,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/62867209:37
cjwatsonno stacktrace in evidence09:37
didrocksthe protection error make it think that something under mutter is interfering…09:37
seb128didrocks, what protection error?09:38
cjwatsonthat's just kernel-speak for SIGSEGV09:38
seb128it seems just a crash09:38
seb128weird that apport didn't catch it09:39
didrocksok, I mispoke, sorry09:39
seb128didrocks, do you get the issue every time?09:41
didrocksseb128: yeah, everytime and only under the unity session09:42
didrocksno in the installer mode, not in the desktop live session09:42
seb128ok, then get a stacktrace09:42
seb128install libglib2.0-0-dbg09:42
seb128run ubiquity and attach gdb to the process which crashes09:43
seb128then get the crash09:43
seb128I'm not sure why apport doesn't catch it...09:43
araRiddell, bug 62868109:43
ubot4Launchpad bug 628681 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Kubuntu OEM did not install oem-config-kde (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/62868109:43
cjwatsonSep  2 08:07:09 ubuntu ubiquity: #015Err cdrom://Kubuntu 10.10 _Maverick Meerkat_ - Beta i386 (20100902)/ maverick/main oem-config-kde all 2.3.1409:44
cjwatsonSep  2 08:07:09 ubuntu ubiquity: #015  Unable to unmount the CD-ROM in /cdrom/, it may still be in use.09:44
cjwatsonsigh09:44
didrocksubiquity log before: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/54764926/ubiquity_debug.log09:45
didrocksgetting the stacktrace now09:45
cjwatsonhello, apt, why are you even trying to unmount09:45
cjwatsonfreaky.  install_extras should be well before cleanup so all the stuff that tells apt not to do that should still be in place09:47
cjwatsonguess I'll rsync and have a look09:47
cjwatsonnot sure we'll have time to fix that for beta though09:47
Riddellit's not too important for beta, people can install oem-config-kde, I've also done a successful oem install on my desktop so it doesn't happen every time09:48
araRiddell, can you add it to known bugs under TechnicalOverview, then?09:49
evcjwatson: perhaps the install/plugininstall split broke that somehow09:49
cjwatsonI was thinking that, but they're both in plugininstall09:50
evwell, install_misc, but yeah09:50
evhm09:50
cjwatsonRiddell: just want to check: in lucid, we put kubuntu-netbook on releases.u.c.  Am I right in believing that (a) kubuntu-netbook has been replaced by kubuntu-mobile for i386 (b) the latter doesn't build right now?09:53
didrockslibappmenu :/09:54
didrocksseb128: what's the environment variable to export already to disable it?09:54
seb128didrocks, unset UBUNTU_MENUPROXY09:54
didrocksemptying UBUNTU_MENUPROXY?09:54
didrocksok09:55
didrockstrying that to confirm09:55
seb128didrocks, I bet it's the same crash that the gnome-display-properties one09:55
seb128didrocks, is that i386?09:55
cjwatsonand can a UNE person remind me which arm images are being released?09:55
seb128didrocks, I can scp my update deb if you want to test09:55
didrocksseb128: yes, i38609:55
didrocksseb128: sure, please :)09:55
seb128the one with the crash fix backport09:55
seb128ok09:55
didrocksogra: see cjwatson's request? ^09:56
cjwatsonstarting prepublication of the images we have now, anyway09:56
cjwatsonsince that's late09:56
cjwatsonChecksumming simple tree (pool) ...09:56
cjwatsonstat: cannot stat `kubuntu/maverick/kubuntu-10.10-alpha2-alternate-amd64.iso': No such file or directory09:56
mvohm, is it ok to upload into the queue for stuff that is trivial? or will that cause work for someone who reviews the queue? I guess its ok, but I want to double check09:56
cjwatsonWTF09:56
cjwatsonmvo: it's ok09:56
mvothanks09:57
seb128mvo, it's ok to upload for anything I think if you see the queue09:57
seb128mvo, it's just that you better ping if you want things reviewed ;-)09:57
mvoseb128: haha - ok :)09:57
seb128didrocks, http://people.canonical.com/~seb128/appmenu-gtk_0.1.7-0ubuntu2_i386.deb09:57
mvoso unfreezing will meld the icecaps :)09:57
didrocksseb128: thanks, trying09:57
cjwatsonok, some kind of cruft left over from alpha-2 I guess09:58
* cjwatson cleans up09:59
cjwatsonskaet: have fixed up publish-image-set.py in lp:ubuntu-archive-tools ('bzr up' to see) and am running through stuff in './publish-image-set --prepublish'.  It doesn't have the right bits for ARM yet, but that's OK, prepublication is idempotent10:00
mvoseb128: thanks, nothing beta-critical, just a a bunch of fixes10:00
didrocksseb128: cjwatson: the appmenu update fixing it10:01
seb128I guess that's worth respinning UNE images?10:02
cjwatsonsounds like it10:02
didrocksupdating the bug10:03
seb128cjwatson, if we respin can we fix bug #623953 as well?10:03
ubot4Launchpad bug 623953 in unity (Ubuntu Maverick) (and 2 other projects) "new tiles are unresponsive (affects: 2) (dups: 1) (heat: 14)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/62395310:03
seb128cjwatson, https://code.launchpad.net/~unity-team/unity/unity.fix-unreactive-tiles/+merge/34293 is the diff10:03
seb128cjwatson, the unity launcher is pretty useless otherwise, icons don't react to clicks10:03
cjwatsonis it uploaded?10:03
seb128or do you just want appmenu-gtk updates?10:03
seb128no but I've both locally10:04
seb128ie I can upload in the next 10 minutes10:04
cjwatsonappmenu not uploaded either?10:04
seb128no10:04
seb128I was waiting on didrocks confirmation10:04
cjwatsonplease upload both ASAP, then10:04
seb128ok10:04
seb128didrocks, ^ doing those10:04
didrocksseb128: thanks!10:04
cjwatsonelmo: pre-publishing to releases, please let me know if it ENOSPCes10:09
seb128cjwatson, ok, appmenu-gtk uploaded10:10
seb128cjwatson, let's play safe and not do the unity change, it's not an important issue for the install and we will get the update after beta10:10
cjwatsonok10:11
seb128default launchers icons are working that's enough to test unity10:11
cjwatsonfine, your call10:11
seb128didrocks, ^10:11
didrockscjwatson: seb128: ok, will do the change in unity with today's release in any case, after beta freeze. Thanks :)10:12
cjwatsonappmenu-gtk accepted10:12
seb128thanks10:12
cjwatsonshould have a new ubiquity this publisher run as well10:12
ogracjwatson, omap3 and 4 shoudl be released, i cant tell about dove, thats fully un NCommander's hands10:15
ogras/un/in/10:15
NCommandercjwatson: dove is about as good as its going to get. ubiquity crashes when you attempt to install, and the icon fails to show up in the launcher10:27
ograNCommander, do you actually want to release in that state ?10:27
ogradoesnt really sound like it makes sense if you cant install at all10:28
cjwatsonso, just to clarify, this corresponds to the ISO tracker entries "Ubuntu ARM Preinstalled omap3", "Ubuntu ARM Preinstalled omap4", and possibly "Ubuntu Netbook armel+dove".  What about "Kubuntu Netbook Arm (omap)"?10:29
* cjwatson curses the inconsistent naming10:29
Riddellkubuntu netbook arm should now be just kubuntu arm and is http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/kubuntu/ports/daily-preinstalled/20100901/10:30
* ogra didnt make up the kubuntu names, i dont think the kubuntu installs worked 10:30
RiddellGrueMaster can confirm10:30
Riddellhe says they work fine, if slow10:30
ograhmm, i saw several bugs of ubiquity not working i think10:30
cjwatsondoesn't need additional confirmation I think, just checking10:30
* ogra checks again10:30
cjwatsonogra: he was saying last night that it was fine10:30
ograok, then release it too10:31
* cjwatson tries to work out how to encode all this in publish-image-set.py10:32
ograoh, i see, bug 628581 ... it worked but produced a crash file which resulted in the bug i saw passing by during triage10:32
ubot4ogra: Bug 628581 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/628581 is private10:32
Riddellwe should also have kubuntu-mobile images for i386 and arm but seems something is up with the Publishing part of the script http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/kubuntu-mobile/maverick/daily-live-20100902.log10:33
cjwatsonRiddell: "Kubuntu ARM" would be painful to deal with.  Shouldn't there be a "desktop" or "mobile" or something in there?10:33
cjwatsonit's "Kubuntu Desktop i386" after all not "Kubuntu i386"10:33
cjwatsonpublish-image-set.py has started to try to parse this so regularity would help10:33
* ogra agrees it should be K"ubuntu Desktop arm" and "Kubuntu Netbook arm"10:34
cjwatsonthe image is "maverick-preinstalled-desktop-armel+omap.img.gz"10:34
ograoops, wrong quotes10:34
Riddellthere is no Kubuntu netbook, netbook and desktop are the same image now10:34
cjwatsonthen just "Desktop"10:34
ograRiddell, hmm ? whats the kubuntu-mobile image then ?10:35
Riddellogra: that's mobile, mobile is different from netbook10:35
cjwatsonbest if it corresponds to the filename10:35
ograRiddell, ok10:35
* ogra admits he has no clue about kubuntu images at all beyond knowing that it takes minutes to move the cursor if they boot 10:35
NCommandercjwatson: The images boot, but we have a regression in ubiquity (probably been there for awhile, but since we didn't use ubiquity on ARM until recently this cycle ...) that prevent installation10:38
NCommandercjwatson: I'm on the fence if we should release them, though a part of me is leaning towards no10:38
ograjust to clearify ... you are talking about dove :) (omap3/4 is all fine)10:40
NCommanderindeed10:41
* cjwatson gives up on trying to encapsulate all this in a single regex10:42
seb128re, system crash again on user switching10:50
seb128cjwatson, ok, got dx to confirm the unity change has been reviewed and I uploaded10:50
seb128cjwatson, up to you to accept it or not10:50
seb128we don't need it on the beta image, it's just a would be nice to have10:50
seb128you can also accept it after the image build if you want so it's available for upgrades after beta10:51
cjwatsonat this point it would delay things by an extra hour10:59
cjwatsonso I'd prefer not, sorry10:59
seb128ok, no worry11:00
seb128as said it's not a blocker for the install in any way11:00
seb128maybe accept it when images are built11:00
seb128so people can get upgrade after install11:00
cjwatsonwell, actually, I need to put the publisher on manual anyway11:01
cjwatsonaccepting for beta11:02
seb128thanks!11:04
seb128sorry for being late I wanted to confirm with somebody from the unity team before uploading it11:04
seb128then my box crashed again on user switching11:04
aracjwatson, ubiquity is crashing for me for netbook, how can I tell if it is the same issue didrocks was having?11:22
cjwatsonara: can you show us syslog?11:22
didrocksara: i386?11:22
cjwatsonogra: is there documentation somewhere that cdimage could link to on how to use preinstalled images?11:22
arayes, i38611:22
seb128ara, try unset UBUNTU_MENUPROXY11:22
seb128ara, then run ubiquity11:22
araseb128, ok11:23
seb128ara, ok get the appmenu-gtk update on launchpad11:23
didrocksor install http://people.canonical.com/~seb128/appmenu-gtk_0.1.7-0ubuntu2_i386.deb :)11:23
seb128test the official one rather11:23
didrocksalready published?11:23
ogracjwatson, hmm, http://testcases.qa.ubuntu.com/Install/ARM/PreinstalledImage#Beagleboard%20ARM%20Image%20Testing shoul i put that on the official wiki ?11:23
seb128ara, https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appmenu-gtk/0.1.7-0ubuntu2/+build/1943471/+files/appmenu-gtk_0.1.7-0ubuntu2_i386.deb11:23
ogra*should11:23
seb128ara, you can just install that and run ubiquity again11:24
seb128ara, if you want to try the fix rather than the workaround11:24
araseb128, OK, will try11:24
seb128ara, could be better so you confirm the fix works11:24
seb128ara, thanks!11:24
cjwatsonpublisher running, all but armel created11:25
cjwatsonogra: yes please, perhaps minus verification stuff11:25
aracjwatson, seb128, didrocks: the fix worked11:30
seb128great11:31
didrocksok, same bug so, great :)11:31
seb128ara, thanks for confirming11:31
araseb128, np :)11:31
Riddellcjwatson: do you know what needs fixed to get kubuntu-mobile images published?11:33
cjwatsonprobably11:34
cjwatsonworking on preinstalled-* right now though11:34
cjwatsonwhich path on cdimage exactly?11:34
ogracjwatson, i made https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ARM/OMAP as a master page which will link the instructions per release11:35
ogracjwatson, we used to have http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-netbook/ports/releases/ for alpha11:36
cjwatsonogra: I was talking to Riddell ...11:37
cjwatsonkubuntu-mobile isn't in ubuntu-netbook :)11:37
cjwatsonthanks for the URL, I'll use that11:37
ograheh, k11:38
cjwatsonRiddell: I have a rather experimental set of changes which should do it.  maybe11:40
Riddellcjwatson: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/kubuntu-mobile/daily-live/20100902/11:40
cjwatsonoh, you mean publishing the dailies.  hmm11:40
cjwatsonI thought kubuntu-mobile was using a preinstalled form factor - is that wrong?11:41
Riddellon ARM it is, not for i386 as far as I know11:41
RiddellScottK: ^^11:41
cjwatsonok11:41
cjwatsonRiddell: can I have short and long descriptions for a mobile image, analogous to desktop -> "desktop CD" and "The desktop CD allows you to try Kubuntu without changing your computer at all ..." from http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/kubuntu/daily-live/current/ ?11:44
Riddell"Preview Mobile Image" and "The Mobile Image offers a preview of the Plasma Mobile workspace to try or install"11:45
cjwatsonRiddell: published.  do you need the size limit bumped?  it says it's oversized right now11:50
cjwatson-rw-rw-r-- 1 cdimage cdimage 838125568 Sep  2 05:22 maverick-mobile-i386.iso11:50
cjwatson                ubuntu-mid|kubuntu-netbook|ubuntu-moblin-remix)11:51
cjwatson                        # Mobile images are designed for USB drives;11:51
cjwatson                        # arbitrarily pick 1GB as a limit.11:51
cjwatson                        SIZELIMIT="$((1024 * 1024 * 1024))"11:51
cjwatson                        ;;11:51
cjwatsonmaybe if I just use that?11:51
Riddellthat's fine11:51
cjwatsonRiddell: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/kubuntu-mobile/daily-live/20100902/ look ok now?11:56
cjwatsonhm, why does that say CD11:57
cjwatsonoh, because it is a CD image.  Do you want it to say image instead?11:57
Riddellpreferably12:00
cjwatsondone12:02
Riddelllovely, thanks12:05
cjwatsonrespinning netbook12:18
cjwatsonwill do kubuntu straight afterwards12:18
ScottKRiddell: That's correct.  We're using preinstalled only on armel.12:19
Riddelljr12:21
Riddellno, this isn't KDM12:21
aracjwatson, Ubuntu Studio remains untested. I have sent an email to their -devel mailing list asking for testing. But I think that, if they don't do their job, it would be better not to release Ubuntu Studio Beta12:32
cjwatsonagreed12:32
cjwatsonskaet: ^- FYI12:32
cjwatsonScottL: ^-12:33
ScottKThey also have a meta upload pending.12:33
cjwatsonI'd much prefer to release everything if it's possible though12:33
cjwatsonpending but not actually in the queue yet, right?12:34
ScottKIt's in the queue.12:35
aracjwatson, skaet: this is the email I sent to their list: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-devel/2010-September/002536.html12:36
* ara -> lunch12:41
cjwatsonScottK: huh, I wonder what's up with queuediff12:42
cjwatsonoh, blah, I bet its scraper doesn't handle batching12:43
ScottKNot sure. Now that LP presents the diff in the queue page, I just look at it (I have to accept from there anyway)12:43
cjwatsonScottL: it would probably have been clearer to remove ia64 and sparc from update.cfg first, but I've accepted ubuntustudio-meta anyway12:44
* cjwatson prepublishes ubuntu preinstalled-netbook armel+omap/armel+omap412:45
cjwatsonhaving hacked the scripts so that's possible12:46
ScottKprepublishing preinstalled images before 8AM local makes my head hurt.12:46
cjwatsonkubuntu desktop respinning12:47
cjwatsonubuntu netbook i386 reposted12:48
cjwatsonskaet: we'll need to release-note wubi upgrades as non-functional for beta (again :-( )12:49
evcjwatson: oh?12:54
cjwatson*upgrades* - lupin needs the corresponding fix that we applied to wubi12:54
evahh12:54
evscared me for a minute there :)12:54
cjwatsonit's in the queue, though I bet there will be other problems, grub2 needs some packaging changes to spot that you're using wubi and not horrifically confuse people12:54
ScottLcjwatson,  testing - ackd, ubuntustudio-meta - thank you13:04
cjwatsonScottL: do you want a rebuild for that ubuntustudio-meta?13:10
cjwatsonI'm guessing it might help13:10
cjwatsonit only takes about 15 minutes to run13:12
smosercjwatson, what time are you expecting/hoping to release?13:16
ttxcjwatson: you still need smoser around to nudge the cloud images stuff, right ?13:17
smoserI've got to be out for a couple hours (~13:00 UTC to 15:00 UTC).  The uec images are all ready to go.13:17
ScottLcjwatson, yes, that would be appreciated13:17
cjwatsonkubuntu desktop reposted13:18
smoserin my absense, someone else *could* do that, a single command on nectarine (promote-daily beta /srv/ec2-images/server/maverick/20100831/  --verbose --allow-existing)13:18
smoserand the ami pages data is available at http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-on-ec2/ubuntu-on-ec2/ami-pages/files, but someone has to update the pages on amazon.13:19
smoserso, i expect i'll be back before you'd need me, but if not, you can grab my cell phone.13:19
Riddellcjwatson: are kubuntu dvds getting respun?13:20
cjwatsonyes, queued13:21
cjwatsonsince they had no tests and known bugs13:21
ttxcjwatson: can we handle smoser's absence in the next two hours ?13:21
smoser2.513:22
cjwatsongosh, I have nectarine access13:22
cjwatsonttx: I don't expect to release until my evening at this point13:22
ttxcjwatson: ack13:22
cjwatsonI can do the nectarine bit, apparently, but I think it would be best if I didn't try to do the amazon stuff13:22
ttxthe amazon stuff can be delayed a bit anyway13:23
ttxit's more about updating some references, the AMIs are already usable13:23
cjwatsonanyway, I don't expect those times for smoser's absence to be a problem13:24
cjwatsonI'm not entirely happy about leaving bug 627672 open in Ubuntu desktop, but I think if I respin that as well then we won't make it today13:25
ubot4Launchpad bug 627672 in ubiquity (Ubuntu Maverick) (and 2 other projects) "[Maverick Beta] install from USB stuck retrieving files 2/6 Hp Mini (affects: 2) (dups: 1) (heat: 16)" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/62767213:25
ScottKslangasek: The KDM plymouth thing is allegedly fixed.  I'm updating the kdebase-workspace 4.5.1 that'll go in after freeze with an improved patch.13:27
ScottKcjwatson: Once we're ~confident we won't be doing any more respins, I'd like to get some of the KDE 4.5.1 packages in and building (just the core ones, the leaf ones will wait just fine) so that when we unfreeze it all builds pretty cleanly.13:28
cjwatsonwhoops, might be a plan to turn the publisher back on13:33
cjwatsonScottK: ok, will be a while yet13:33
ScottKcjwatson: Sure, just wanted to get my place in line.13:34
cjwatsonskaet: updated wubi notes in tech overview13:40
cjwatsonScottL: ubuntustudio reposted13:47
cjwatsonhm, wait, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MaverickMeerkat/ReleaseManifest indicates that the omap preinstalled images will go on cdimage not releases, so I should un-prepublish those14:03
cjwatsonlast time, imx51 and dove went on releases, and omap on cdimage14:05
cjwatsonbut David edited the omap line so I guess it's OK by him14:06
cjwatsonrobbiew: your first version of https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MaverickMeerkat/ReleaseManifest was missing imx51 and dove, compared with LucidLynx/ReleaseManifest.  Was this intentional?  What should we do with the existing dove image, if it turns out to be OK to release?14:07
cjwatsonRiddell: should I be posting kubuntu mobile to the tracker?14:08
Riddellcjwatson: I don't think you can, it doesn't have the appropriate bits as far as I know14:09
cjwatsonRiddell: also, I am hopelessly confused about the fact that we have kubuntu-mobile/daily-live/current/maverick-mobile-i386.iso but kubuntu-mobile/ports/daily-preinstalled/current/maverick-preinstalled-desktop-armel+omap.img.gz14:10
cjwatsonwhy is the first mobile and the second desktop?14:10
cjwatsonRiddell: I can add products, I believe14:10
Riddellthat won't be deliberate, probably something missing in the scripts14:10
Riddellcjwatson: oh if you can add Kubuntu Mobile that would be great14:10
cjwatsonthough I don't know how the download stuff works14:10
cjwatsonwould you mind if I rearranged the arm stuff then, to be mobile?14:11
cjwatsonthe inconsistency is a bit of a pain14:11
Riddellcjwatson: yes please do fix the name on that armel image14:11
cjwatsonI've added a product for Kubuntu Mobile i386 but I don't know how to set up a download URL for it14:12
ogracjwatson, yeah, cdimage is fine14:12
cjwatsonok14:15
cjwatsonogra: can you edit MaverickMeerkat/ReleaseManifest accordingly?14:15
ograwhat should i edit there ? it already says cdimage, no ?14:16
cjwatsonogra: not for dove?14:17
cjwatsonoh, you were talking about omap14:17
ograoh, for dove i dont really know :/14:17
cjwatsonsorry, misread context of your reply14:17
cjwatsonno edit needed on your part then14:17
ograwell, i could have been clearer (as always)14:17
ograbut dove is surely not in a quality to go on releases atm14:18
ograso leave it on cdimage14:18
ograuless davidm (who is ill) will say differently for final i guess it will stay there, i'll ask him to add the right stuff to the wiki if he's around again14:18
ogra*unless14:19
cjwatsonok14:21
cjwatsonRiddell: done I think, will respin after Kubuntu DVD14:28
cjwatsonI think we're nearly there14:29
Riddellcjwatson: are you able to edit the tests in iso testing too?14:39
Riddellskaet, cjwatson: I need to go out in about 2.5 hours, if the release happens when I'm away ScottK can give the OK for the Kubuntu images14:41
* ScottK waves14:42
ttxara: you marked http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/result/4442/454 started, are you still on those ?14:45
cjwatsonRiddell: to some extent but I probably ought not to try at this point14:46
cjwatsonKubuntu DVD reposted14:46
cjwatsonKubuntu Mobile i386 posted, but I don't know how to add testcases for it and will ask #ubuntu-testing for help14:48
=== robbiew is now known as robbew
=== robbew is now known as robbiew
robbiewcjwatson: yeah...ogra would know better than me about the imx51 and dove images...did we release those for alpha3?15:03
ograrobbiew, imx51 doesnt exist ... and i'm not involved with dove, but i think we found a solution already anyway15:04
robbiewokay15:04
scott-workcjwatson: i realize you are most likely extremely busy but i was wondering if you could take a minute or two and clarify a few points to me about the Beta release (or point me to one who is available)?15:12
cjwatsonscott-work: go ahead and ask, and I can answer when feasible15:13
scott-workcjwatson:  my ignorance is slightly embarassing but i think i'm confused or ignorant about the beta iso image testing15:15
scott-workcjwatson: the beta image was available two days ago (i believe) but it appears that we need to test by the end of today so that it can be "released"15:15
arascott-work, when we get to beta freeze, we start publishing candidate images in the tracker15:17
cjwatsonwell, the actual release goes out today, and normally images are available a day or two (ideally two) before for testing; sometimes we need to respin them due to bugs though15:17
cjwatsonit can be hard work getting everything in on time; if it's not feasible, it's possible to slip individual flavours15:18
arascott-work, so, in order to make sure that those are usable, people test them and report back to the ISO tracker15:18
cjwatson(though not ideal)15:18
scott-workara:  i presumed that the ISO tracker test needed to be completed before the next ISO image was to be released in order to secure the next release, i.e. A1 -> A2, etc15:20
cjwatsonthe ISO tracker is a tool to help us validate any given milestone release15:20
scott-workara:  this would result in almost a full month to complete the ISO tests for each image15:20
arascott-work, a full month?15:21
cjwatsonum15:21
cjwatsonthere is clearly some confusion, how do you get to that?15:21
cjwatsonoh, I think I see your confuion15:21
scott-workcjwatson: oh good, i was having trouble articulating it15:22
cjwatsonit isn't worth starting testing until the development and bug-fixing for a given milestone is more or less complete15:22
cjwatsonthere's no point starting to test the beta images at alpha 3, because many of the uploads that will go into the beta images aren't there yet15:22
cjwatsonthe point of the ISO testing is to validate that the images we're releasing to users actually work15:22
scott-workcjwatson: that last sentence is the key15:23
cjwatsonobviously there is a use for continuous testing as we go along, but that isn't the purpose of iso.qa15:23
scott-workwe need to test image rather than the "release", that 's what qa test are for15:23
scott-workyes15:23
cjwatson(so "it isn't worth starting testing" is a bit exaggerated, sorry)15:23
scott-workso at each milestone (alpha1, alpha2, et al) we will have one or two days to validate the ISO images before it will be released for further testing by users/developers ?15:25
arascott-work, that's it15:25
ScottKscott-work: Hopefully 3, but it never seems to work out that way.15:26
scott-workthat was my confusion; not fully understanding the purpose of iso.qa and the time allotted to testing of the image15:26
scott-workthank you very much, as studio lead i will be much more diligent with ISO testing in the ffuture15:27
ScottKOK. Get to work ....15:28
robbiewScottK cracks the whip :)15:29
scott-worklol, i'm actually at work now ;) and sending email the list and on irc at the same time15:29
cjwatsonbetter to get this sorted out for beta than for final15:35
aracjwatson, during OEM netbook I got the bug of not installing oem-config16:19
aracjwatson, I have checked the log and have seen that it is the same error as bug 62868116:19
ubot4Launchpad bug 628681 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Kubuntu OEM did not install oem-config-kde (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/62868116:19
aracjwatson, do you agree to point to that one (changing the title to cover all of them)16:20
aracjwatson, or do you prefer a new bug16:20
ara?16:20
cjwatsonlet's make it a new bug please16:23
arasure16:23
arawill do16:24
cjwatsonjust in case it's the same kind of thing in a couple of places16:24
araOK16:24
ScottKara: Looking at http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/test/4522 I don't see a test case for the "guided" option.16:24
cjwatsonara: was bug 628681 an install from USB?16:26
ubot4Launchpad bug 628681 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Kubuntu OEM did not install oem-config-kde (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/62868116:26
cjwatsonit looks like it from the logs but you didn't mention it, so checking16:27
aracjwatson, yes, it was USB16:27
aracjwatson, I will comment it in the bug16:27
SpamapSanybody care to comment on bug 625882 .. ABI breakage in libdbi .. new upstream fixes it, but we need to rebuild all of the build-depends ...16:30
ubot4Launchpad bug 625882 in libdbi (Debian) (and 7 other projects) "libdbi0: ABI breakage without package name change (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Unknown,Unknown] https://launchpad.net/bugs/62588216:31
araScottK, if you feel that a new testcase is needed, can you please send an email to ubuntu-qa explaining why it is needed?16:31
araScottK, thanks!16:31
ScottKara: Don't we want a test case for each install option?16:31
SpamapSThe other option is to sync w/ Debian w/ has regressed to the previous upstream version for squeeze rather than rebuild the build-depending packages (of which there are 6)16:32
arasure, but without previous notice from developers it is hard to keep up with the different options16:32
ScottKOK.16:32
ScottKara: It's ubuntu-qa@l.u.c, right?16:32
araScottK, correct, thanks a lot16:33
marjohi cjwatson16:38
marjocjwatson: re: ubuntu studio i386 running inside virtualbox, running inside virtualbox, "software installation failed" after skipping optional software (CORE only)16:39
ScottKSpamapS: Did you do test rebuilds?16:40
marjoi chose "no automatic updates"16:40
cjwatsonmarjo: do you have installer logs?16:41
marjocjwatson: "download language support", i chose no16:41
marjocjwatson: Choose software to install: I chose <Continue>16:42
SpamapSScottK: because of the brokenness of libdbi's bin packages, they have to be altered slightly (libdbi0-dev changed to libdbi-dev)16:44
SpamapSScottK: I've tested rrdtool, the others I'm waiting on.16:44
cjwatsonmarjo: I'm running a test here, although logs would be more efficient16:45
ScottKSpamapS: Once you've rebuilt them all, ask again and I'll evaluate it.16:45
marjocjwatson: "An installation step failed. You can try to run ... Select and install software"16:45
marjocjwatson: ok16:45
ttxskaet, cjwatson: do you need anything more for -server ? Will call it a day in ~15min17:01
ttxskaet, cjwatson: smoser should be around to nudge the cloud images17:01
smoseri'm here.17:01
cjwatsonI don't think so17:02
skaetttx,  could you look over the TechnicalOverview and make sure the hightlites are accurate.17:03
ttxskaet: I did that, let me recheck :)17:04
skaetttx,  thanks!  :)17:04
ScottKcjwatson: Could I get a respin of Kubuntu live powerpc?17:05
ttxskaet: looks good to me. You still have a few "waiting input, needs update?" lines in there, though17:05
ttx(not -server related)17:05
ScottKNow that it looks like we're ~there, I have a tester for it.17:05
skaetttx,  thanks.   will be deleting them in a final pass if can't get more input, before then.  (place holders).17:06
ttxskaet: ack17:07
cjwatsonScottK: on its way17:09
ScottKcjwatson: Thanks.17:10
cjwatsonright, posted ubuntustudio 20100902.1, which I'm fairly sure will be better17:18
holsteinhey guys17:21
* holstein is testing the amd64 ubuntustudio iso's today :)17:21
Riddellright I'm away, back in about 6 hours, I think we'll be good for release seems like the dvds are getting tested, ScottK can confirm when it needs confirmed17:22
cjwatsonRiddell,ScottK: kubuntu-mobile for arm respun with better image names, so it's now preinstalled-mobile as discussed.  That's not on the tracker - do you want me to try to fight with the tracker to get it added, or just test it out of band?17:26
cjwatsonholstein: as long as you test 20100902.1 not 2010090217:26
holsteincjwatson: thats what im just asking about17:26
ScottKcjwatson: I'd say let's test it out of band unless you have spare time to play with the tracker.17:26
cjwatsonnot so much17:26
* holstein is DL'ing from the dailies17:27
holstein@ http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntustudio/daily/current/17:27
charlie-tcaWell, I guess I will have the ubuntustudio images to sync next time17:27
holsteinNM17:28
* holstein totally sorted17:28
holsteinhttp://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/info/452317:28
ScottKcjwatson: Are we considering lack of wubi testing a blocker?17:33
cjwatsonI think that's up to you guys17:33
ScottKOK.17:33
cjwatsonmy gut feel is that if Wubi is going to break at the moment it's liable to break across the board17:33
ScottKOK.  If you know of someone who could test it, both Kubuntu and Xubuntu are asking for wubi testers ....17:34
marjo__cjwatson: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntustudio/daily/20100902.1/maverick-alternate-i386.iso not found17:37
ScottKOK, got one wubi tester.17:37
marjo__holstein: were you able to grab the amd64 ubuntu studio OK?17:37
holsteinmarjo__: yeah17:38
holsteinfrom http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/info/452317:38
marjo__holstein: can't seem to find the i386 image17:38
holsteinmarjo__: let me see if i can find the i386 one17:38
marjo__holstein: thx17:38
holsteinmarjo__: yeah17:39
holsteinhttp://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/info/452917:39
holsteiniso not found17:39
holsteinlet me ask...17:39
marjo__holstein: thx for confirming; i already asked cjwatson17:39
holsteinwill that be someone in the studio team that needs to fix it?17:40
holsteinwhatever...17:40
charlie-tca images were just rebuilt, it may not have hit yet17:40
* holstein making a little noise over there17:41
holsteincharlie-tca: true17:41
holsteinmarjo__: how about http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/info/452417:41
marjo__holstein: ok, that's available17:42
holstein:)17:43
holsteinhmmm17:43
holsteinmarjo__: i think its the wrong one though17:43
holstein12:25 < cjwatson> holstein: as long as you test 20100902.1 not 2010090217:43
holsteinthat one is 2010090217:43
holsteinmarjo__: lets just wait a bit and see if it 'comes in' auto-magically17:44
marjo__holstein: that's what i'm afraid of; cjwatson said he posted ubuntustudio 20100902.117:44
marjo__holstein: ack17:44
holsteinmarjo__: w00t17:47
holsteinhttp://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/info/452917:48
holsteinits there now :)17:48
holstein20100902.117:48
marjo__holstein: yeah, now i see it17:49
cjwatsonit just takes a while to push to the internal mirrors17:53
cjwatsonpanic not typically required :)17:54
ScottKIs the powerpc live for Kubuntu still building?17:54
cjwatsonno, it's done, I'll post it17:55
cjwatsonand remove ia64 from that directory ..17:55
ScottKCool.17:55
ScottKThanks.17:55
cjwatsonScottK: powerpc isn't on the tracker - the build id is 2010090217:58
ScottKcjwatson: Thanks. It doens't need to be on the tracker.17:58
ScottKIt's more if it doesn't create a smoking hole, it passes.17:58
cjwatsonhm, the cdimage.u.c public mirror(s) does seem to be being awfully slow to sync17:59
ScottKOK.  I was about to ask.18:00
cjwatsonelmo: would you mind having a quick poke at alpinecurrant and seeing if its rsync has melted or something?18:01
cjwatsonat least that's the mirror I'm seeing18:01
cjwatsonI'll do some more data pruning18:01
charlie-tcaIt took up to 15 minutes to sync yesterday18:01
cjwatsonit's taken most of an hour here18:03
elmoit's link is saturated :(18:05
elmoironically, the other two don't have this problem, because they can't saturate their own (Gbit) link with outbound traffic18:06
elmo(they're older and slower)18:06
cjwatsonah, there we go, it's synced now18:11
ScottKStill don't see it at http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/kubuntu/ports/daily-live/18:14
cjwatsonoh, I meant studio18:16
cjwatsonI've kicked another sync18:16
ScottKOh.  OK.18:16
ScottKcjwatson: powerpc for Kubuntu landed.  I doubt it will get tested in time, so don't hold releasing for it.19:20
ScottK(probably do it tomorrow if it works out)19:20
marjo__holstein: are you able to test ubuntu studio amd64?19:25
marjo__holstein: i can only do i38619:25
holsteinmarjo__: we're talkig about that right now19:25
holsteinmarjo__: im done pretty much19:25
marjo__holstein: ack & thx19:25
holsteinwaiting on the last test right now19:25
holsteinmarjo__: may i PM you?19:42
scott-workcjwatson: it appears the updates to ubuntustudio-meta didn't make it into the 20100902.1 ISO image19:42
scott-workcjwatson: dholbach reported bug 62898119:43
ScottKscott-work: Fix is already done/on the way.19:43
cjwatsonyou sure?  it was confirmed installable.19:43
ubot4Launchpad bug 628981 in linux-rt (Ubuntu) "linux-headers-rt not installable breaks installation (affects: 2) (heat: 10)" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/62898119:43
ScottKOh, .1.19:43
cjwatsonI'm pretty certain that dholbach was using 20100902 and just didn't check.19:43
holsteincjwatson: i was using .1 though19:43
cjwatson(note that I've already followed up to that bug)19:43
cjwatsonholstein: and ...19:43
holsteinfailed at 'select and install software'19:44
cjwatsoncdimage@antimony:~/cdimage/www/full/ubuntustudio/daily/current$ grep -- -rt *.list19:44
holsteini the alternate installer19:44
cjwatsoncdimage@antimony:~/cdimage/www/full/ubuntustudio/daily/current$19:44
cjwatsonlinux-headers-rt is not on current images19:44
cjwatsonholstein: I need installer logs19:44
holsteincjwatson: i can do that19:44
scott-workhow do you get the installer logs when installation fails?19:45
holsteinyeah19:45
cjwatson"save debug logs" from the installer main menu19:45
holsteinthats what i was about to google ;)19:45
holsteincjwatson: i'll do that and get them in here for you, thanks19:45
loolHey there, we have a new package in maverick/NEW called linaro-image-tools; it would be nice to get that included in maverick/universe proper, that requires FFE + NEW queue processing; is the release team ok with that?19:46
cjwatsonsyslog is the important one19:46
cjwatsonlool: doesn't sound like a major problem, but after beta please19:46
loolOh sorry, it's not out for Ubuntu yet, I'm confused because we announced the Linaro one; my bad19:47
loolI intended to mention it post-beta; will raise it up tomorrow or Monday19:47
cjwatsonOther than Ubuntu Studio, is anyone aware of any reason I shouldn't start publishing the beta?19:48
cjwatsonThe test matrix isn't entirely complete, but looks reasonable; I've gone through all of the red bugs19:49
ScottKcjwatson: Kubuntu is ready.19:49
cjwatsonthe Kubuntu partitioning label one is the scariest of them, and Riddell has already declared that not a blocker19:50
newz2000what are the expected URLs to be updated for beta? /testing /testing/maverick/beta, is there another one too? (do the release notes go live with beta or is that later?)19:50
ScottKcjwatson: Yes.  I was giving you the opinion of the person who signs off on the release, not my personal preference ....19:51
cjwatsonnewz2000: /download?  (I forget)19:52
newz2000cjwatson: no, we won't update that until release19:52
cjwatsonrelease notes will need to be copied from the tech overview, but IIRC that goes on /testing/maverick/beta?19:52
newz2000yeah, that's the way it shows for lucid19:52
cjwatsonnews sidebar19:53
newz2000is there a redirect to show the release notes during installation?19:53
cjwatsonyes, the same one there has been for several releases19:53
* newz2000 checks on that19:53
cjwatsonhttp://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes?os=$PROJECT&ver=$VERSION&lang=$LANG19:54
cjwatsonwhere $PROJECT $VERSION $LANG vary19:54
cjwatsonstarting publishing19:59
skaetnewz2000, cjwatson,  will do a final pass on the TechnicalOverview with Robbie, and then let you know when its good to clone.19:59
holsteincjwatson: Ubuntu-Studio 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Beta amd64 (20100902)20:00
holsteini got it from http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/info/4528 though20:00
holsteinsays 20100902.120:00
holsteinis this the issue?20:01
cjwatsonyour image is too old, yes.  rsync it up to date20:01
cjwatsonperhaps you fetched it just before the tracker was updated20:03
holsteinhttp://paste.ubuntu.com/487397/20:03
holsteincjwatson: well, thats easy enough then :)20:03
cjwatsonyes, that's the old image20:03
* holstein tries again20:03
newz2000All ready on my end. Only step left is the tech overview. This is my first time doing it on the new system so may need a little extra time (20m should be more than ample)20:07
cjwatsonhm, our source images are broken20:08
cjwatsonwill have to fix that before final, too late now20:08
cjwatsonnewz2000: was planning to allow at least two hours for mirroring20:09
cjwatsondoes that sound sufficient?20:09
newz2000cjwatson: yeah, I think so20:09
cjwatsonpitti is a god20:09
cjwatsonthis publish-image-set.py is such a time-saver, even if I will have to fiddle about around the edges towards the end20:10
cjwatsonI can just copy and paste the commands to run, with an eyeball check20:10
cjwatsonand it gets all the versions from the iso tracker20:12
cjwatsonsyncing out the content for releases.ubuntu.com20:22
cjwatsonnot all the cdimage pieces are in place yet20:22
ScottKcjwatson: If I'm not around when the time comes, ryanakca has his finger on the trigger of kubuntu.org.20:23
cjwatsonthings still to do: ubuntu netbook preinstall armel+omap/4; netboot; ubuntu server uec; kubuntu mobile i386/armel; wubi?20:30
cjwatsonScottK: is http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/kubuntu-mobile/daily/ stale and removable?20:31
cjwatsonISTR building alternates for k-m was just a mistake20:31
ScottKWe got one good wubi test on kubuntu.20:31
ScottKcjwatson: mistake/test, but yes, it can be removed.20:31
cjwatsonit's gone20:33
ScottKcjwatson: I'm working on getting some feedback on the kubuntu mobile images.  I expect we'd release them tomorrow if at all (like powerpc)20:39
GrueMastercjwatson: What is left to do?  <cjwatson> things still to do: ubuntu netbook preinstall armel+omap/4;20:39
=== cjwatson_ is now known as cjwatson
cjwatson20:42 <cjwatson> GrueMaster: publication20:44
cjwatson20:43 <cjwatson> that was a public note-to-self20:44
cjwatson20:43 <cjwatson> netboot prepared, not synced20:44
GrueMasterok.  The netboot images will probably not be tested immediately.  Lots of other things happening, and apparently they are low on the radar.20:46
cjwatsonI wasn't referring to testing20:48
cjwatsonmy comment was "these are the things I still need to publish"20:48
cjwatsonubuntu netbook preinstall armel+omap/4 published (pending mirror sync)20:48
cjwatsonhttp://releases.ubuntu.com/.manifest trimmed down to just maverick for the sake of the mirror prober20:49
cjwatsonelmo: acai is taking a long time to come back from sync-mirrors.  is it ok?20:49
elmocjwatson: same deal20:49
cjwatsonok, it returned eventually20:50
cjwatsonjpds: ^- comment about manifest20:50
cjwatsonScottL: should I publish Ubuntu Studio for beta?  I held off due to the confusion about the -rt packages, but that seems to have been resolved20:51
cjwatsonno amd64 tests yet20:51
cjwatsonsmoser: can you please go ahead and publish the EC2/UEC images?20:52
smosercjwatson, yes sir.20:53
cjwatsonScottL,scott-work: charlie-tca's test on #-testing seems to be going well so far20:53
scott-workcjwatson: good, thank you :)20:54
marjo__cjwatson: studio i386 mandatory tests passed20:55
cjwatsonScottK: do you want kubuntu mobile to go under kubuntu/releases/ (i.e. with the DVD etc.) or under kubuntu-mobile/releases/ ?20:59
cjwatson(the latter will tend to cause the scripts to talk about "Kubuntu-Mobile" everywhere ...)20:59
cjwatsonbut I'm not sure whether you want it with the DVD, or on its own20:59
ScottKcjwatson: That latter.  It's a very rough tech preview this cycle, so the further away from production releases the better.21:00
cjwatsonok21:00
cjwatsonogra: if you're still around, same question for the netbook preinstalled images - do you want them along with the Ubuntu DVD in releases/, or on their own in ubuntu-netbook/releases/ ?21:00
cjwatsonor maybe even in ports/releases/ or ubuntu-netbook/ports/releases/ or oh god I'm so confused21:01
cjwatsonpublishing ubuntustudio21:02
marjo__cjwatson: thx!21:02
scott-workmarjo__: thanks for tenaciously testing !21:15
marjo__scott-work: never give up! thank you!21:16
cjwatsonnetbook preinstalled: I'm opting to place them separately for now21:16
* holstein is burning the amd64 ubuntustuio iso21:17
holsteinhopefully the right one ;)21:17
cjwatsonNCommander: I have not published dove, for now; let me know if that should change21:21
smosercjwatson, http://uec-images.ubuntu.com/releases/maverick/beta/ and http://ubuntu-ec2-maverick-amd64.notlong.com/ and http://ubuntu-ec2-maverick-i386.notlong.com/ are updated. ie "uec images 'Released'"21:21
cjwatsonnotlong.com?21:22
smoserthey redirect.21:24
smoserto amazon pages.21:24
cjwatsonskaet: I believe everything is now published21:28
cjwatsonskaet: some of the URLs may take a while given that the datacentre is now presumably frantically shifting data around21:29
skaetack.21:29
cjwatsonwow, lack of HEADER.html in some of these places too21:29
cjwatsonum, yeah, give it a while ...21:29
cjwatsonelmo: acai has been syncing releases for over an hour - this could prove difficult21:30
cjwatsonskaet: anything else you need from me?21:35
skaetcjwatson,  do you have a bung number for the OEM installation mode?21:35
skaets/bung/bug/...21:35
cjwatsonskaet: bug 628681, bug 628290, bug 62891121:42
ubot4Launchpad bug 628681 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Kubuntu OEM did not install oem-config-kde (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/62868121:42
ubot4Launchpad bug 628290 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "OEM installation, missing "Prepare for shipping to end user" icon (affects: 1) (heat: 3440)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/62829021:42
ubot4Launchpad bug 628911 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Ubuntu Netbook OEM did not install oem-config (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/62891121:42
skaetcjwatson,  Thanks!    Sleep well.21:46
charlie-tcafrom #ubuntu+121:54
charlie-tca<Sary> Well , you guys are done such a great job .. so thank ya a bunch :-)21:54
ScottKskaet: If we the release happens before Riddell gets back, ryanakca will be taking care of getting the announcement on kubuntu.org.22:14
ScottK(he may anyway)22:14
ogracjwatson, alpha-3 was in ubuntu-netbook/releases/ hmmm, i'm not really sure i must say :)22:23
cjwatsonlet's just stick with that structure then; that has the virtue that I've done it already ;-)22:23
ogralol22:23
cjwatsonshould be on the website to check out now22:23
ograok22:23
cjwatsonso please confirm and such22:23
ograoh, WOW ! you fixed make_web_indicies !22:24
ograthanks so much22:24
ogra(that was at the very bottom of my TODO for maverick)22:24
ogracjwatson, perfect22:25
cjwatsonfor preinstalled-*?  yep, happy birthday22:25
ograheh22:25
cjwatsonat least some of cdimage has yet to catch up :-/22:26
ogralooking at cdimage i wonder if it deserves a cleanup spec for natty to avoid all that directory confusion once and for all it is really quite chaotic22:29
cjwatsonmm, people keep turning up with new requirements :-/22:30
cjwatsonthe ports separation is perhaps unhelpful22:30
ograi think all the different possible release dirs we have are ...22:31
ScottKtoo many22:31
ograhavig dailies on a per project base is fine, but milestones and release should all live in the same place22:31
charlie-tcaWouldn't many names have to be changed then? All the images have the same name, only the directories change22:32
* charlie-tca thinks "or I have lost track again and you should ignore me"22:33
ogracharlie-tca, only the target dirs for milestones/releases would have to be unified22:33
charlie-tcaSo we could find them easier? That would be nice22:34
ScottKIt would have been nice to keep that third amd64 builder ....22:34
holsteincharlie-tca: thanks for doing these ubuntustudio 64bit test :)22:50
charlie-tcano problem22:50
holsteinhttp://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/test/452822:50
=== kees__ is now known as kees
holsteinwe're all tested :)22:50
marjo__holstein: thx22:51
holsteinw00t :)22:51
marjo__holstein:  ubuntu studio i386 manual partitioning test case passed22:51
holsteinsweet22:52
robbiewokay ladies and gentlemen...I'm sending the official email22:53
ograwohooo !22:53
robbiewand it will sit until slangasek approves the email22:53
robbiewlol22:53
charlie-tcaThank you, cjwatson22:53
marjo__robbiew: thx; test coverage is fairly complete22:54
slangasekis that a hint? :)22:54
robbiewheh22:54
cjwatsonhow are the CD mirrors looking?22:54
* robbiew need to relocate back home...battery is low22:54
marjo__robbiew: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/testcases22:54
robbiewack22:55
cjwatsonwell, at least some of them have at least some of the data ;-)22:55
cjwatsoncan somebody who is not behind NAT check the torrents?22:55
=== marjo__ is now known as marjo
cjwatsonhm, it's a bit late, but let's resurrect queuebot23:09
cjwatsondidn't realise it was out all day23:10
newz2000This is my last beta release as webmaster. :`(23:27
newz2000(but that's ok, happy days are still ahead)23:28
newz2000and have you ever seen such a pretty beta release page?23:28
slangasekrobbiew: hey, where did you send that message?  I'm not finding it in the mod queues23:29
cjwatsonnewz2000: overachiever23:30
cjwatson;-)23:30
cjwatsonhm, we mentioned the Kubuntu Ubiquity redesign but not the Ubuntu one23:31
robbiewslangasek: hmm23:31
newz2000mt gets the credit. Both for the beauty and the last min pushes to live I inflected on IS23:31
cjwatsonah well23:31
cjwatsonrobbiew: are you planning to do the other announcement steps listed in BetaProcess?23:32
skaetnewz2000,  its a very cool page23:32
robbiewslangasek: heh...it was sitting in my outbox of course23:32
cjwatsonyou and your fancy mailers23:33
cjwatsontelnet smtp.canonical.com 25 doesn't have an outbox23:33
robbiewnah...I forgot I turned my mailer offline23:33
robbiewheh23:33
slangasekback in MY day, the outbox was acoustically coupled to the inbox23:33
cjwatsonyeah, well MY outbox had to be filled up with coal twice a day, rain or shine23:34
slangasekyou didn't need your computer to tell you you had mail, you could hear the mail without any fancy sound cards23:34
robbiewlol23:35
skaetlol23:35
robbiewcjwatson: : yeah, I can complete it23:35
robbiewBetaProcess that is23:35
cjwatsonawesome23:35
* robbiew also adds that to the Links section of /ReleaseTeam ;)23:35
skaetcjwatson,  go get some sleep  :)23:35
cjwatsonmy thought exactly23:36
cjwatsongosh, fancy, I don't think I'd ever seen /ReleaseTeam23:37
cjwatsonBTW, planning to let the KDE stuff in the queue flush out in a controlled manner under ScottK's guidance, and I'll open the floodgates again tomorrow morning23:37
robbiewcjwatson: /me created it ;)23:41
robbiewgrrrr...stupid evolution23:44
* skaet wonders if the demo she got on how to send out the email needs to be redone ;)23:44
cjwatsonstep 1: use mutt23:45
robbiewnah...I thought I had auto-complete for ubuntu-announce23:45
cjwatsonanyway, I shall stop trolling and go to sleep; 'night23:45
robbiewI didn't23:45
robbiewlol23:45
robbiewso it got sent to ubuntu-announce...instead of ubuntu-announce@lists.ubuntu.com23:46
robbiewhttp://www.sadtrombone.com23:46
skaet:(23:47
robbiewslangasek: you should NOW see it in the moderator queue :/23:48
robbiewslangasek: wait...it was rejected...because of the stupid header crap23:49
robbiewdamn it!23:49
Riddellevening23:51
Riddellwhat's the status?23:51
robbiewRiddell: announcement sent23:52
slangasekrobbiew: and moderated23:52
robbiew;)23:52
skaet:)23:53
skaet... and in the inbox.  :)23:55
robbiewslangasek: BetaRelease says to update http://release-blog.ubuntu.com/....how exactly do I do that :)23:57
* skaet is interested too...23:58
slangasekrobbiew: you click on the link that takes you straight to the admin page for it, then you get someone to get you a username and password :)23:58
slangaseklemme see if I can swing that23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!