[02:55] <ScottK> lfaraone: In the long run you'll be happier if you set up a seed.
[02:55] <ScottK> You can set it up yourself, it doesn't have to be the same place as ubuntu seeds.
[04:15] <micahg> could I get a please lucid bug task on bug 625801
[04:51] <micahg> is it normal to not have an rpath in a lib, but have it in a binary in teh same source?
[04:52]  * micahg wonders where everyone is tonight
[04:52] <RAOF> A binary in the same source rings alarm bells - you need to ensure that binary is SONAME versioned so libfoo1 and libfoo2 are parallel installable.
[04:53] <micahg> RAOF: it's gjs :) in Debian, the lib has the rpath removed, but gjs-console has an rpath
[04:53]  * micahg might be confused as to what rpath is :)
[04:53] <RAOF> Hah.
[04:53] <micahg> is it not the path to the lib that it's linked against?
[04:54] <RAOF> No, I think Debian has just forgotten to strip the rpath from gjs-console
[04:54] <micahg> RAOF: ah, so if I do it, I'll be ok?
[04:54] <RAOF> As long as you're handling the libmozjs debacle in a different way, yes.
[04:55] <micahg> RAOF: I'm deleting the rpath like Debian and adding a wrapper around gnome-shell
[04:55] <micahg> and gjs-console I guess
[04:55] <RAOF> Yup.
[04:55] <micahg> yay :)
[05:00] <micahg> I can at least upstream the rpath removal from gjs-console :)
[05:00] <micahg> RAOF: do you have time to add an SRU task for me?
[05:01] <RAOF> For gjs?
[05:01] <micahg> RAOF: no, gnome-web-photo
[05:01] <RAOF> Ah.
[05:02] <RAOF> 'Tis in universe, so I can accept your nomination for Lucid.
[05:02] <micahg> \o/
[05:02] <micahg> bug 625802
[05:02] <micahg> oops
[05:02] <micahg> bug 625801
[05:09] <micahg> RAOF: I still get gjs-console linked against libmozjs
[05:09]  * micahg tries a test build in maverick chroot
[05:10] <RAOF> micahg: I thought I'd fixed that with a combination of the requires.private patch + libtool patch + -Wl,--as-needed
[05:11] <micahg> nope, unless I broke it when I merged :)
[05:11] <micahg> it's in preinstall, so I could have the wrong path to strip
[05:12] <RAOF> Wait.  Do you mean it's still _linking_ against libmozjs, or it's still got an _rpath_ of /usr/lib/xulrunner-abombinable?
[05:12] <micahg> libmozjs.so => /usr/lib/xulrunner....
[05:13] <micahg> whereas libgjs is: libmozjs.so => not found
[05:16] <RAOF> It's got the pair; an rpath _and_ an unnecessary linkage to libmozjs!
[05:17] <micahg> RAOF: oh, should I stop them from linking against libmozjs also?  Is there a guide?
[05:21] <RAOF> micahg: So, one of the patches I had to gjs was a patch to the gjs.pc file, moving libmozjs to Requires.private.
[05:22] <micahg> RAOF: yes, let me make sure I still have that
[05:22] <micahg> yep
[05:22] <micahg> still there
[05:22] <RAOF> From memory that should also have removed the linkage.  Or maybe not, and it needs the -Wl,--as-needed LD_FLAGS + the libtool patch to make it work.
[05:23] <micahg> auto_configure is overriden to include that
[05:23] <RAOF> And is there a libtool patch still in there?
[05:24] <micahg> yes, in the debian dir
[05:24] <RAOF> (--as-needed only works when the linker ordering is correct, and libtool gets it wrong)
[05:25] <RAOF> It's also possible that gjs-console actually uses symbols from libmozjs directly, I guess.
[05:25] <micahg> k, but why wouldn't the rpath get deleted
[05:27] <RAOF> dunno
[05:27] <RAOF> Sorry :)
[05:27] <micahg> RAOF: do I need to worry if I add a wrapper around it?
[05:28] <RAOF> Yes, because the wrapper won't work, I think.
[05:28] <RAOF> Because gjs-console will still be looking in /usr/lib/whatever-I-was-linked-against
[05:28] <micahg> RAOF: ugh, ok
[05:29]  * micahg isn't sure what to do, I wanted to get this uploaded tonight
[05:43] <micahg> siretart: the couchdb bug appears fixed in lucid, please clarify the issue in lucid
[05:55] <micahg> RAOF: oh, so it's linking, but there's no rpath
[05:57] <micahg> there never was one :-/
[06:06] <RAOF> Ah.
[06:08] <micahg> well, idk how to test teh consile
[06:08] <micahg> colse
[06:08] <micahg> console
[06:09] <RAOF> You run gjs-console, and then type javascript
[06:09] <RAOF> IIRC
[06:09] <RAOF> It's a repl
[06:09] <RAOF> From memory :)
[06:09] <micahg> oh, so if the path is gone, it says not found in ldd
[06:10] <micahg> nope
[06:10] <micahg> does what I found mean it'll work?
[06:10] <micahg> I tried launching it by moving mozjs
[06:10] <micahg> and it launched
[06:10] <micahg> oh, I forgot my other test
[06:11] <micahg> RAOF: I think it's all good
[06:11] <micahg> with the wrapper it works
[06:13] <micahg> RAOF: do you think I need an FFe for these changes?
[06:14] <RAOF> I don't think so.
[06:14] <RAOF> * Note: Not a release team member :)
[06:14] <micahg> RAOF: k, I didn't think so either, but I just wanted a second opinion
[06:26] <siretart> micahg: hm. indeed, the logrotate.d/couchdb looks fine in the package. it seems that didn't get updated for me on upgrades
[06:26] <siretart> I've now fixed it locally, most probably its also fixed for new installations
[06:27] <siretart> not sure what went wrong during the upgrade for me
[06:31] <micahg> siretart: idk, well, I wonder if anyone else will comment that it's still broke in Lucid, I guess if they do, I'll take another look
[06:32] <micahg> siretart: it could also be the order the pre/post scripts are run in
[07:11] <dholbach> good morning
[07:18] <siretart> morning daniel!
[07:37] <ajmitch> morning dholbach, siretart
[07:37] <dholbach> hi ajmitch
[07:37] <dholbach> hey siretart
[09:05] <directhex> DktrKranz, you're awake!
[09:07] <DktrKranz> directhex: yawn
[09:09] <directhex> DktrKranz, we've been given a deadline of... uh... tonight to get the latest banshee in shape for possible default-in-UNE status. and i've got one build-dep for it (so far) sat in Debian NEW for experimental
[09:11] <DktrKranz> which one?
[09:12] <directhex> gio-sharp. it has a new binary package, due to going from stable to unstable lib status in this release
[09:13] <DktrKranz> dinstall is running, so no chance to do it right now, but in 20 minutes... ;)
[09:14] <directhex> awesome
[09:54] <directhex> DktrKranz, can i also add gkeyfile-sharp to that request? it's a teeny tiny binding package, made by the skilled hands of hyperair and Laney
[09:57] <DktrKranz> sure
[09:57] <DktrKranz> doing now
[10:00] <DktrKranz> directhex: I can't find gkeyfile-sharp
[10:00] <Laney> needs to be processed
[10:01] <directhex> give it 3 minutes!
[10:01] <DktrKranz> ah, yeah, it's still in incoming
[10:01] <DktrKranz> *unchecked
[10:01] <directhex> Successfully uploaded packages.
[10:02] <DktrKranz> (that will be the fastest out-of-NEW ever!)
[10:02] <directhex> :)
[10:03] <Laney> one source and one more binary NEW after these...
[10:03] <Laney> upstreams........
[10:03] <directhex> bloody upstreams
[10:30] <DktrKranz> Laney: directhex: I couldn't find GKeyFile/Tests/src/GKeyfileTests.cs in tarball (maybe it was there in a older version?), but accepted
[10:31] <directhex> awesome. thanks, luca!
[10:33] <Zombie> Hey is anyone investigating the graphical corruption with Intel drivers when Kernel mode setting is enabled?
[12:03] <Zombie> i A xserver-xorg-video-intel What does the A mean here?
[13:00] <Korbit> hi everyone
[13:00] <iulian> Hi there.
[13:00] <Korbit> just opened a needs-packaging bug, changed status to "in progress" and assigned it to me
[13:01] <Korbit> i really want to create my first ubuntu package
[13:02] <Korbit> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/629459
[13:10] <iulian> Korbit: I believe lmms is already packaged.
[13:10] <Korbit> not version 0.4.8
[13:10] <Korbit> i'm using lucid and i only has 0.4.5
[13:11] <iulian> Korbit: Ah, misunderstood you then.  I thought you want to package it from scratch.
[13:12] <iulian> Korbit: There are some wiki pages explaining how to update a package.
[13:12] <Korbit> i thought i needed to package it from scratch
[13:12] <Korbit> great, i'll look into that
[13:12] <micahg> Debian has 0.4.7
[13:14] <Korbit> should i update from that debian package then?
[13:14] <iulian> Oh, then it'd be great to update it in Debian and then sync/merge.
[13:17] <Korbit> iulian, i should get the debian source package for 0.4.7 and update it to 0.4.8 right?
[13:20] <iulian> Korbit: Right.
[13:20] <Korbit> i'll try to do that =)
[13:20] <directhex> who is maintainer in debian? some folks don't welcome random updates
[13:21] <Korbit> Patrick Winnertz i suppose
[13:21] <Korbit> i've found this: http://packages.debian.org/sid/sound/lmms
[13:21] <micahg> there's no watch file, a wishlist update bug might be enough to get it updated
[13:22] <Korbit> ok, i'll just install from source then
[13:24] <Korbit> i'll delete the bug i opened
[13:26] <Korbit> can't delete so just removed me from the "assigned to"
[13:34] <Korbit> i'll try to package lmms anyway just for me, just to learn how it's done
[13:37] <micahg> Korbit: the maintainer might not do it in time, so it could still be needed, was just a suggestion...
[13:37] <Korbit> ok, i'll work on it
[13:38] <Korbit> at least, i'll try to, because i've never done anything like this
[13:49] <flask_> hi guys. I am trying to package a python package that has po files in them for localization. i want to use debhelper. what is the recommended way to handle the po files?
[13:52] <AnAnt> Hello
[14:07] <lfaraone> ScottK: hm. what's required to do so? I looked on the wiki and couldn't find anything.
[14:08] <lfaraone> ScottK: short term is there anything wrong with thwat we're doing?
[14:10] <ScottK> lfaraone: If you look in a standard meta source you'll see in (IIRC) update.cfg you tell it where to find the seeds.
[14:10] <ScottK> In the short run, no, it's just that manually maintaned per-arch lists are very hard to get consistently right.
[14:11] <lfaraone> ScottK: fair enough. fortunately the additions are arch-all.
[14:12] <lfaraone> ScottK: it seems to be ubuntu-archive controlled.
[14:18] <lfaraone> If a Sugar-related ubuntu-native package is maintained in a bzr branch, should it be owned by ~ubuntu-sugar-uploaders or by ~ubuntu-dev?
[14:18] <lfaraone> (I think u-s-u should imply membership in ubuntu-dev)
[14:42] <kklimonda>  /b 13
[14:51] <kklimonda> do you have some example of using waf with cdbs?
[14:51] <kklimonda> hmm.. maybe midori..
[14:54] <kklimonda> nope..
[15:15] <leonel> hello: merges from debian to a package in universe  still open ??
[15:17] <AnAnt> leonel: depends, if it is just a bug fix (ie. no new features), then it is fine. Otherwise you will need a freeze exception
[15:18] <leonel> AnAnt: it's  cherokee  maverick has 1.0.4 wich has a nasty ssl bug  and debian unstable has already 1.0.8 with the bug fixed
[15:19] <AnAnt> no features introduced between 1.0.4 to 1.0.8 ?
[15:20] <leonel> most bug fixes
[15:23] <RoAkSoAx> leonel: that'd be a good candidate to merge then, specially if it is a security fix (if that';s the case with ssl)
[15:23] <AnAnt> leonel, RoAkSoAx: or rather sync, I don't see any Ubuntu diff for it
[15:23] <leonel> RoAkSoAx: it's not a security fix it's a bug fix  the browser hangs when using  ssl
[15:24] <leonel> RoAkSoAx: this with < 1.0.8
[15:24] <leonel> so ..  what should I to to get 1.0.8 in  Maveric ??  merge ? sync ?
[15:24] <RoAkSoAx> leonel: as I said above, sounds like a good candidate to sync/merge.
[15:25] <AnAnt> leonel: sync
[15:25] <leonel> reading  sync procedures ..
[15:25] <leonel> thanks ..
[15:25] <AnAnt> leonel: just run: requestsync cherokee maverick
[15:25] <AnAnt> you'll need the -s switch
[15:25] <AnAnt> and maybe -e too
[15:26] <leonel> installing ubuntu-dev-tools ..
[15:26] <AnAnt> -e is for FFe, I'm still not sure if you need it or not
[15:30] <kklimonda> bah, anyone familiar with cdbs? can I include /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/gnome.mk and prevent it from calling some automatic configure rule?
[15:30] <ScottK> lfaraone: Probably ubuntu-dev.
[15:32] <ScottK> lfaraone: See seed_base in update.cfg for (for example) kubuntu-meta.
[15:32] <ScottK> You can host the seeds wherever you want.
[15:34] <AnAnt> the seeds should be hosted in  soil
[15:35] <AnAnt> happy planting...
[15:42] <leonel> AnAnt: so just with requestsync  will do the magic ??
[15:43] <AnAnt> leonel: yes, it will file a proper sync request
[15:44] <leonel> great !
[15:44] <AnAnt> just use the -s switch to subscribe ubuntu-sponsors
[15:44] <AnAnt> and I am not sure about FFe
[15:58] <lucidfox> http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Untitled-Page31.png <-- this mockup looks like it was done in an application
[15:58] <lucidfox> what software is that?
[16:06] <oojah_> lucidfox: I think it's pencil: http://pencil.evolus.vn/en-US/Home.aspx
[16:17] <geser> lucidfox: could be Balsamiq
[16:21] <lucidfox> oojah_> yes, seems it's Pencil
[16:21] <lucidfox> Anyone know what Ubuntu design folks use for UI prototypes on the wiki?
[16:21] <vish> lucidfox:  Balsamiq
[16:22] <vish> lucidfox: sometimes on the wiki , what you see is mpt's own handy work ;)
[16:23] <lucidfox> Well, I normally draw by hand, or use Glade
[16:34] <kklimonda> glade isn't flexible enough imo
[16:34] <kklimonda> I often end up fighting with it rather then actually do mockup ;)
[16:34] <kklimonda> doing*
[16:43] <kklimonda> james_w`: hey, I'm trying to prepare an update for lucid and can't get bzr merge-upstream to work - this is what I get: http://pastebin.com/rQC5w2vG
[16:44] <james_w`> kklimonda: that's a bug which is fixed in trunk
[16:44] <james_w`> I should get that uploaded
[16:44] <james_w`> you can use a checkout of trunk in the meantime if you want to get past that error
[16:44] <james_w`> there's no workaround that I know of unfortunately.
[16:45] <kklimonda> trunk of bzr-builddeb, right?
[16:46] <Korbit> i'm having trouble here
[16:46] <Korbit> i just upgraded to maverick
[16:46] <Korbit> i was trying to create a package for lmms 0.4.8 from a debian package 0.4.7 following daniel holbach's youtube video on upgrading packages
[16:46] <kklimonda> james_w`: thanks, it helped
[16:47] <james_w`> good
[16:47] <Korbit> i got this error when pbuilding
[16:47] <Korbit> [......]Remove the following packages:
[16:47] <Korbit> 1)     pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy
[16:47] <Korbit> debian/control doesn't list that dependency
[16:47] <Korbit> how can i solve this?
[16:58] <Korbit> i'm trying upgrading the ubuntu 0.4.5 package version and it breaks while applying the diff from 0.4.5 :(
[16:58] <Korbit> can't solve this either
[17:05] <Korbit> i tried debuild anyway
[17:05] <Korbit> breaks with this error:
[17:05] <Korbit> debian/rules:3: /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make: No such file or directory
[17:05] <c_korn> sudo apt-get install quilt
[17:05] <RoAkSoAx> SEJeff_work: ping?
[17:06] <Korbit> i wonder why the debian package doesn't require this
[17:06] <c_korn> what is the ubuntu 0.4.5 package anyway ?
[17:06] <Korbit> i'm talking about lmms 0.4.5
[17:06] <Korbit> ubuntu has lmms 0.4.5 and i need 0.4.8
[17:07] <Korbit> so i'm trying to create my first .deb from the source of 0.4.5
[17:07] <SEJeff_work> RoAkSoAx, pong
[17:07] <Korbit> following the instructions of the MOTU videos
[17:07] <RoAkSoAx> SEJeff_work: are you still working a lot with Keepalived?
[17:07] <SEJeff_work> RoAkSoAx, Ha! How did you know that?
[17:07] <SEJeff_work> Well I've got about 60-65 boxes with keepalived in prod
[17:07] <SEJeff_work> But it "just works TM" for us.
[17:08] <Korbit> debuild: fatal error at line 1337:
[17:08] <Korbit> i guess this is a leet fatal error!
[17:08] <RoAkSoAx> SEJeff_work: just PM'ed how I knew :).
[17:08] <Ash-Fox> Hello, I am faced with a complicated situation. I want to make it as easy as possible for people to install my repository on their system and simualtaniously dowload and install a specific package. The best idea I have come up with so far is a .deb package that installs the repository to /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ and then the repository it self offers an update for the package which identical
[17:08] <Ash-Fox> except for a 'require' for another package which is the actual application in question.
[17:08] <RoAkSoAx> SEJeff_work: have you ever experienced this, or any thoughts??: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/maverick/+source/keepalived/+bug/619712
[17:08] <Ash-Fox> I hope that didn't break up.
[17:09] <Ash-Fox> The problem with that though, is that obviously the user won't get prompted immediately to 'update' to install the application.
[17:10] <SEJeff_work> RoAkSoAx, We don't use Ubuntu on servers
[17:10] <SEJeff_work> Also, we run: keepalived-1.1.15
[17:10] <SEJeff_work> And since it works perfectly for our dns/ldap servers, we haven't bothered upgrading distros
[17:10] <Korbit> i guess i can't upgrade the package from 0.4.5 to 0.4.8
[17:11] <RoAkSoAx> SEJeff_work: well for what I understood that's not only ubuntu related issue, given that bug reporter says that exists on 1.1.17 and 1.2.0, which is not in Ubuntu. But Anyways, thanks :)
[17:11] <Korbit> i'll just forget about this and compile from source
[17:12] <SEJeff_work> RoAkSoAx, Perhaps it is the 2 interfaces thing?
[17:12] <SEJeff_work> I'd try with 1 interface / machine to isolate it
[17:12] <Korbit> its not easy for someone to contribute to ubuntu
[17:12] <RoAkSoAx> SEJeff_work: yes, that's what i'm also thinking. I'm setting up a testing environment to see if I can reproduce that with only one interface
[17:13] <SEJeff_work> RoAkSoAx, However, keepalived has an irc channel
[17:13] <SEJeff_work> Please make sure to report this upstream
[17:13] <SEJeff_work> Do you work @canonical now?
[17:14] <RoAkSoAx> SEJeff_work: this has already been reported upstream but there hasn't been any answer. That's why I just posted new message saying if someone was able to look into this.
[17:14] <SEJeff_work> Well how was it reported upstream?
[17:14] <RoAkSoAx> SEJeff_work: Nope I don't but I kinda take care of clustering packages / loadbalancing :)
[17:14] <SEJeff_work> Also try #keepalived and their mailinglist
[17:14] <SEJeff_work> They do releases, but slowly
[17:14] <SEJeff_work> Seems reasonable RoAkSoAx
[17:16] <RoAkSoAx> SEJeff_work: they do not have a bug tracking system, do they? I don't seem to find one
[17:17] <SEJeff_work> RoAkSoAx, Looks like you're right
[17:17] <SEJeff_work> Did you follow up on their devel mailinglist? http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/keepalived-devel
[17:18] <RoAkSoAx> SEJeff_work: yeah, they reported the issue there, but there hasn't been an answer. I just emailed to the list to see if someone looked into it or not.
[17:19] <SEJeff_work> Thanks
[17:19] <SEJeff_work> Try to break the ubuntu sucks with upstream myth
[17:20] <RoAkSoAx> haha will do :)
[17:20] <RoAkSoAx> we already did that with HA Clustering - Pacemaker/Heartbeat/etc etc
[17:37] <lucidfox> ...okay, what the heck
[17:37] <lucidfox> Glade has opened a blank rectangle instead of a popup menu, and now it's whole UI is stuck
[17:38] <lucidfox> which is bloody frustrating
[17:38] <lucidfox> had to restart and all my changes to that file are lost, grrrrrr
[18:11] <cosme> hi, some revu admin/mod could archive this package?
[18:12] <cosme> http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/mixxx
[18:49] <DktrKranz> lucidfox: you could want to ask removals of valknut armel binaries, so it can enter testing :)
[18:50] <lucidfox> DktrKranz> that's libdc0... and... I'd prefer to find out why it fails that TTH test :S
[18:51] <lucidfox> but I don't have access to an armel machine where the build fails, and it succeeds in armel pbuilder for me
[18:51] <DktrKranz> I could test it on a porterbox, and eventually upload them
[19:09] <SpamapS> micahg: bump.. bug 557024 has 12 people affected now.. ;)
[19:10]  * ScottK waves to ajmitch and wonders if he was affected by wobbliness in his part of the world?
[19:11] <SpamapS> ScottK: I don't know if we can call 7.anything "wobbliness" .. thats like calling the surface of the sun "warm". ;)
[19:14] <micahg> SpamapS: yes, we'll deal with it next week, chrisccoulson told me something was wrong which I'll try to fix (idr what it is ATM)
[19:14] <SpamapS> micahg: the rpath isn't needed if we do the wrapper.
[19:14] <micahg> SpamapS: right
[19:15] <chrisccoulson> SpamapS, the only issue with patching the build system to drop the rpath (which is a trivial change) is that the test-suite then fails
[19:15] <chrisccoulson> i tried it a couple of weeks ago
[19:15] <micahg> chrisccoulson: that was it :)
[19:15] <chrisccoulson> so you need to run the test-suite with LD_LIBRARY_PATH
[19:16] <micahg> SpamapS: if you want to update the merge with those changes, I"ll review over the weekend
[19:18] <SpamapS> sounds straight forward enough
[19:20] <RoAkSoAx> SEJeff_work: I entered the same race condition with only two servers with configs: Srv1: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/487938/ Srv2: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/487939/. What might be wrong on them? Srv1 log: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/487941/ srv2 log: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/487942/
[19:38] <DktrKranz> lucidfox: building on a porterbox now. In case of success, should I upload it to allow both packages entering testing?
[19:39] <lucidfox> DktrKranz> siretart tried before and failed
[19:39] <lucidfox> it fails the test on porter
[19:40] <DktrKranz> d'oh
[20:04] <directhex> lucidfox, which porterbox? there are two armel porterboxes now
[20:48] <garfieldairlines> meow !
[20:48] <garfieldairlines> I'm an admin of the french wikipedia and I'd want to have a MOTU for an interview on the sister project : wikinews
[20:48]  * hyperair wonders who's french and a MOTU
[20:49]  * garfieldairlines is french but an english MOTU is fine too
[20:50] <fabrice_sp> garfieldairlines, French MOTU here, if you are still interested
[20:51] <garfieldairlines> \o/
[20:51] <fabrice_sp> :-)
[20:53] <ajmitch> ScottK: it woke me up, but didn't cause damage here (about 300km from where it did hit) :)
[20:54] <ScottK> ajmitch: Glad to hear it's OK there.
[20:54] <ajmitch> lifeless is in the affected city though
[20:54] <ajmitch> so he probably got woken up as well :)
[20:54]  * ScottK looks over to see if lifeless is OK then?
[20:57] <ajmitch> power is out in some parts of christchurch, and he might have better things to do than irc on a saturday morning :)
[21:00] <lifeless> I'm fine
[21:00] <lifeless> check twitter/fb :P
[21:03] <ajmitch> house isn't a bit shaken?
[21:28] <lifeless> ajmitch: haven't done a full check yet
[21:29] <Awsoonn> hi all, bug 614067 - the package appears to just need a recompile for 10.10. How can this be acomplished?
[21:29] <lifeless> but so far only found one thermos fallen off of a table
[21:29] <Awsoonn> I think a motu can do this?
[21:30] <lifeless> ajmitch: http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/4094979/Huge-earthquake-rocks-Christchurch
[21:31] <lifeless> ajmitch: surprised you weren't woken; there were dunedinites tweeting
[21:31] <lifeless> gman was woken in wellington
[21:39] <ScottK> Awsoonn: I'll take a look at it.
[21:39] <ajmitch> lifeless: I was woken
[21:40] <ajmitch> got up & checked the geonet site to see where it might have been
[21:40] <Awsoonn> ScottK: thanks!
[21:43] <Rhonda> iulian: Thanks. :)
[21:44] <Rhonda> iulian: I'm not sure wether I should had sent bug 629793 and bug 629797 also with the requestsync -e switch, the help said it is only needed for non-bugfix updates, is that right?
[21:46] <iulian> Rhonda: I have never used requestsync with the -e param. :)
[21:47] <ScottK> Awsoonn: You are on Maverick, right?
[21:48] <Awsoonn> ScottK: yup~
[21:49] <iulian> Rhonda: Both bugs are OK.  They don't need ubuntu-release.
[21:50] <ScottK> Awsoonn: It installed OK here, but it does look a bit odd.  I'll try and investigate later tonight.
[21:52] <ScottK> I'm also on i386, so that may have a different result