[00:01] <slangasek> robbiew, skaet: passwords sent
[00:02] <skaet> thanks.
[00:03] <sbeattie> skaet|robbiew: hrm, no 10.04.1 announcement there, might want to add that to the documentation for point releases.
[00:03]  * sbeattie didn't know http://release-blog.ubuntu.com/ existed until now.
[00:06] <robbiew> slangasek: thnx for the blog access
[00:16] <akgraner> robbiew, skaet, slangasek  et al - Thank you!!!!!
[02:06] <akgraner> hey all - as part of verifying links are correct in posts on the Fridge I found 10 mirrors that aren't working  - who should I tell?
[02:21] <charlie-tca> It can take some time for all the mirrors to update
[02:21] <charlie-tca> xubuntu mirrors will take up to 3 days, for example
[02:22] <akgraner> ahh ok
[02:22] <akgraner> some of the links were listed as .00 and .04 I fixed those and they seemed to work but thought I should let someone know
[02:23] <charlie-tca> hmm, not sure who to notify. But, usually got to wait at least 24 hours to make sure
[02:23] <akgraner> Thanks!  See I learn something new everyday :-)
[02:23] <charlie-tca> Who is the release manager now? Is it Kate Stewart?
[02:24] <akgraner> nods
[02:24] <charlie-tca> email her, maybe?
[02:24] <akgraner> :-)
[02:25] <ScottK> akgraner: jpds is the one to tell.
[02:25] <ScottK> If he's not here now, he'll read the scrollback and find out once he's awake.
[02:25] <akgraner> okie dokie :-)
[02:26] <akgraner> Thanks!!! :-)
[03:50] <ScottK> slangasek: Would you please accept kdeedu in an hour (55 minutes or more from now)?
[03:50]  * ScottK is going to bed.
[03:54] <ScottK> (or anyone else who happens by)
[03:55] <ScottK> Good night.
[04:06] <lamont> oh meh.  if some kind release manager would sync nmap 5.21-1 from debian to replace 5.21-1~build1 in maverick, that'd be lovely.. the diff exists only in the changelog
[04:06] <lamont> I suppose that requires paperwork at this point
[04:15] <ScottK> that or giving me shell access.
[04:15] <lamont> pretty sure that would be bad for me...
[04:15] <ScottK> all a matter of priorities.
[04:15] <lamont> this change isn't so much a priority
[04:15] <ScottK> ;-)
[04:16]  * lamont sleeps
[06:17] <micahg> Do I need an FFe for removing an rpath from libgjs that requires gnome-shell to be have a wrapper for mozjs?  (I have both ready to upload with wrappers)
[06:50] <slangasek> ScottK: the new kdeedu seems to have dropped a fix needed on armel; is that now upstream?
[06:51] <slangasek> (the changelog seems to diverge from what's currently in maverick, so I can't even infer that whoever merged it had to have seen it; I'm loathe to set armel a-buildin' such a package that may just FTBFS)
[06:54] <ara> morning slangasek, all!
[06:54]  * slangasek waves
[07:21]  * ttx waves
[09:14] <cjwatson> NCommander: I've just re-enabled most of the cdimage cron jobs, but have left dove disabled in case you tell me that we want to publish it for beta after all
[09:15] <NCommander> cjwatson: we might have a possible ubiquity fix but I suspect we're too late for a respin at this point
[09:16] <cjwatson> respinning is unlikely to be feasible because the archive has moved on
[09:16] <NCommander> cjwatson: right, ok, forget it. The beta images aren't worth releasing at this point without a working ubiquity :-/
[09:16] <cjwatson> although it hasn't properly reopened, I'm about to, and quite a few packages have been accepted
[09:16] <cjwatson> we could publish the images with a patch file attached, if necessary ...
[09:17] <cjwatson> what are the consequences of dove missing beta?
[09:17] <NCommander> cjwatson: none, I think. davidm been MIA though so I can't confirm with him, but we don't have a contractical oblingation AFAIK
[09:27] <ara> cjwatson, good morning
[09:28] <ara> cjwatson, skaet sent an email to ubuntu-devel earlier this morning that is awaiting moderation. Could you please approve it?
[09:32] <cjwatson> huh, I thought she was on the accept list
[09:35] <ara> cjwatson, yes, I was surprised as well
[09:37] <cjwatson> done and done
[12:01] <lool> Would love getting a FFE + NEW review of linaro-image-tools; should be fairly trivial, as we only install a single script in a binary package; it has a couple more in the source currently unused
[13:07] <cjwatson> right, unapproved is entirely flushed now
[13:08] <ogra> hooray
[13:11] <cjwatson> lool: accepted linaro-image-tools, seems fine for universe at least
[13:12] <lool> Thanks
[13:12] <micahg> Do I need an FFe for removing an rpath from libgjs that requires gnome-shell to be have a wrapper for mozjs?  (I have both ready to upload with wrappers)
[13:15] <cjwatson> if it's a bug-fix, you have both ready, and you're pretty certain it doesn't affect anything else (have you searched the archive for reverse-deps?), I don't think so
[13:19] <micahg> cjwatson: great, thanks
[13:19] <micahg> yes, I search with apt-cache rdepends libgjs0a
[14:11] <lamont> cjwatson: is it worth the pain to ask for nmap to move from 5.21-1~build1 to 5.21-1 via a sync from debian?
[14:11] <lamont> I totally spaced that it got stuck in NEW on debian
[14:11] <lamont> or some such
[14:50] <cjwatson> lamont: I don't particularly mind - just file a bug in the usual way
[14:50] <lamont> cool
[16:02] <ScottK> cjwatson: I have reports that Kubuntu powerpc live image for beta started up and did not create any black holes or otherwise cause the world to end, so I was wondering if you would publish it as a release as well.
[16:04] <cjwatson> 20100902?
[16:04]  * ScottK double checks
[16:05] <ScottK> cjwatson: Yes.  Please.
[16:19] <cjwatson> ScottK: published and syncing out
[16:19] <ScottK> cjwatson: Thanks.
[16:22] <ScottK> slangasek: The Kubuntu netbook 10.04.1 images that you set aside earlier have been validated and should be relased. im51 and omap work.  dove doesn't but it didn't work for 10.04 (don't care if you publish it or not).
[19:23] <jdstrand> ScottK: hey, so I have a couple questions on the https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess:
[19:23] <ScottK> ok
[19:23] <ScottK> Shoot.
[19:24] <jdstrand> 1. section '5' (Exceptions for Universe/Multiverse) implies to me that everything you need to know about FFes for universe/multiverse will be under that section
[19:24] <jdstrand> however, based on other pages, that seems to not be the case
[19:24] <jdstrand> (eg, new source packages)
[19:25] <jdstrand> ScottK: can you clarify that?
[19:25] <jdstrand> (not the page, but my weak understanding)
[19:25] <ScottK> jdstrand: No.  That's meant to be differences from Main/Restricted, not comprehensive.
[19:26] <jdstrand> ah
[19:26] <jdstrand> that makes much more sense then
[19:26] <jdstrand> *much*
[19:26] <jdstrand> I have no further questions :)
[19:26] <ScottK> Great
[19:27] <jdstrand> ScottK: I may add some wording to that effect to the wiki
[19:27] <ScottK> Absolutely
[19:29] <jdstrand> ScottK: thanks btw :)
[19:30] <ScottK> jdstrand: You're welcome
[19:46] <slangasek> ScottK: kubuntu-netbook/lucid/armel> seems to be published now, without even having to repeatedly scrub the directory and republish with different commandline args
[19:46] <slangasek> so for point release ports publishing, an unqualified success
[19:47] <ScottK> Wahoo! Thanks slangasek.
[19:54] <lool> Gosh, I had requested a FFE before the release again, I really suck
[19:54] <lool> cjwatson: Sorry, was really confused about the beta release
[21:06] <cjwatson> slangasek: dunno if you noticed, but netbook/ports/etc. release publishing should now be marginally less ridiculous with a change I made to publish-release to let you avoid all the ../ silliness
[21:07] <cjwatson> it's still wonky in a fundamental way, but less irritatingly so
[21:17] <slangasek> oh, cool
[21:17] <slangasek> maybe that's why I was pleasantly surprised that publishing worked right the first time :)
[21:18] <cjwatson> perhaps there should be a notion of source project and target project
[22:23] <Laney> Does anyone have time to run a couple of reasonably pressing NEW source package syncs required for Banshee?
[22:24] <Laney> I am led to believe that the plan is agreed with the RT
[22:24] <Laney> gkeyfile-sharp/experimental gio-sharp/experimental
[22:24] <Laney> sorry, that's one NEW source one NEW binary only
[23:41] <Laney> filed them, bug 629899 bug 629895
[23:41] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 629899 in gio-sharp (Ubuntu) "Sync gio-sharp 2.22.2-1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main) (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/629899
[23:41] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 629895 in ubuntu "Sync gkeyfile-sharp 0.1-1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main) (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/629895