nhandler | lifeless: I just got an OOPS-1707ED2083 for that link that mlaci posted | 00:01 |
---|---|---|
ubot5 | https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1707ED2083 | 00:01 |
nhandler | The issue is still there even on non-edge: OOPS-1707M1769 | 00:02 |
ubot5 | https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1707M1769 | 00:02 |
lifeless | well non-edge is generally worse | 00:02 |
lifeless | need to wait a few minutes for the oops to sync | 00:02 |
lifeless | ok | 00:05 |
lifeless | Page-id: Archive:+packages | 00:05 |
lifeless | https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/soyuz/+bug/607934 | 00:06 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 607934 in Soyuz "timeouts on +packages (affected: 1, heat: 6)" [High,Triaged] | 00:06 |
lifeless | there is a nuts query there | 00:07 |
lifeless | LIKE '%' || '' || '%' | 00:07 |
lifeless | thats going to chew cpu and be slow | 00:07 |
lifeless | I'm going to file a new bug on it | 00:07 |
lifeless | mlaci: did you manually create that url | 00:07 |
lifeless | mlaci: or did launchpad generate the link to it ? | 00:07 |
lifeless | mlaci: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/soyuz/+bug/629921 | 00:20 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 629921 in Soyuz "Archive:+packages with empty name search does like '%% search. (affected: 1, heat: 6)" [High,Triaged] | 00:20 |
lifeless | mlaci: fixing that may not be enough to fix your PPA, you have a lot of builds there. | 00:21 |
lifeless | mlaci: but I'm sure it will help. | 00:21 |
Ddorda | hey guys, any idea why i get this error when doing bzr branch lp:ubuntu-drupal-theme ? | 00:42 |
Ddorda | the error: bzr: ERROR: Not a branch: "bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-drupal-devs/ubuntu-drupal-theme/6.x-2010/". | 00:42 |
maxb | Ddorda: it seems to work for me | 00:54 |
lifeless | Ddorda: have you done 'bzr launchpad-login'? | 00:59 |
lifeless | maxb: it may be an explicit stacking rule, incompatible with http if Ddorda doesn't have bzr+ssh setup | 00:59 |
lifeless | maxb: just a theory | 00:59 |
maxb | oh... I thought lp was supposed to fix those up | 01:12 |
wgrant | I don't think it even did it back when it mirrored branches. | 01:15 |
lifeless | maxb: no, they need to be relaitve paths always | 01:17 |
=== bpeel is now known as bpeel_away | ||
=== dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | ||
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
=== dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | ||
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
=== dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | ||
=== easter_egg is now known as easter_egg|off | ||
=== easter_egg|off is now known as easter_egg | ||
=== easter_egg is now known as easter_egg|off | ||
=== easter_egg|off is now known as easter_egg | ||
=== easter_egg is now known as easter_egg|off | ||
ricotz | hello, could someone have a look at this build https://launchpad.net/~xorg-edgers/+archive/ppa/+build/1945560 which shows this error "dpkg-deb: failed to create directory: No space left on device" | 08:06 |
ricotz | wgrant, hi ^ | 08:07 |
LinuxJedi | oh, nice. Launchpad seems to have mixed up my account and one I used to use several years ago :( | 08:58 |
freedo | morning | 09:02 |
LinuxJedi | ah, ok, it seems launchpad reverted email logins to the state of a month or so ago | 09:02 |
freedo | i have a strange error when trying to build a package on launchpad: it complains the i386 builder cannot find a compatible libstdc++ | 09:02 |
freedo | amd64 builds fine though | 09:03 |
freedo | can anyone advise how to fix that? | 09:03 |
=== Lcawte|Away is now known as Lcawte | ||
bilalakhtar | Why does my +karma show that my karma has expired? Shouldn't it have become less than expiring completely? | 09:29 |
nigelb | freedo: ppa? #ububntu-packaging might be agood place | 09:33 |
bilalakhtar | People, the e-mail interface of lp is down. | 09:33 |
nigelb | bilalakhtar: weekend is not the perfect time since most losa's might be away, you can file a question against lp about it | 09:33 |
nigelb | err, that was about the +karma query | 09:33 |
bilalakhtar | both are problems :((((( | 09:34 |
bilalakhtar | Is anyone else over here having the same e-mail interface problem? | 09:34 |
lifeless | bilalakhtar: you haven't described your problem | 09:36 |
lifeless | so its impossible to say | 09:36 |
lifeless | perhaps you should describe it | 09:36 |
lifeless | as for karma, it degrades over time and then expires completely. | 09:36 |
bilalakhtar | lifeless: One is unable to comment by sending an e-mail to nnnnnn@bugs.launchpad.net or whatever | 09:36 |
lifeless | it takes years to do this (I forget the exact time frame) | 09:36 |
lifeless | bilalakhtar: more details please | 09:36 |
bilalakhtar | Second case | 09:36 |
bilalakhtar | requestsync in the ubuntu-dev-tools package is failing to file sync requests when using the e-mail interface | 09:37 |
lifeless | bilalakhtar: what happens, do you get an error, do you get a non delivery report | 09:37 |
bilalakhtar | lifeless: nothing at all | 09:37 |
lifeless | bilalakhtar: there are many possible causes for that; check your mail logs to make sure that the mail has actually been sent | 09:37 |
bilalakhtar | however requestsync works okay using --lp options | 09:37 |
nigelb | do you have the bug numbere with happened? | 09:37 |
nigelb | s/with/where | 09:38 |
lifeless | the most common cause is mail not being sent | 09:38 |
bilalakhtar | bug #625239 | 09:38 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 625239 in plymouth (Ubuntu) "Pressing Enter crashes both X and plymouth in graphical mode (affected: 7, heat: 42)" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/625239 | 09:38 |
* nigelb sees a coment from you | 09:39 | |
bilalakhtar | nigelb: That was a comment using the Web UI | 09:39 |
bilalakhtar | and I have 2 comments pending from around 2 hours using the e-mail interface | 09:39 |
nigelb | which email ID did you mail from? | 09:39 |
nigelb | i.e. are you sure its from one of those you have registered with LP? | 09:40 |
bilalakhtar | The mail was sent at Sat, 04 Sep 2010 10:28:09 +0300 from bilalakhtar@ubuntu.com | 09:40 |
bilalakhtar | yes I have been sending many e-mails to bugs from that and it never failed | 09:40 |
* nigelb wonders if ubuntu.com mail server is working | 09:40 | |
Laibsch | Is there anything wrong with the targets http://paste.debian.net/87721/ in ~/.dput.cf? Whenever I upload a particular package to them it is refused with "The source apt-cacher-ng - 0.5.4-1 is already accepted in ubuntu/lucid and you cannot upload the same version within the same distribution." | 09:40 |
Laibsch | that's strange for two reasons. 1) I'm uploading to maverick 2) even the lucid source in that ppa has been deleted about 24 hours ago | 09:40 |
bilalakhtar | nigelb: ubuntu.com e-mail server doesn't need to work for sending mails | 09:41 |
bilalakhtar | nigelb: the mails have a modified From: header but they are actually sent from yahoo or gmail or whatever is your preferred address | 09:41 |
nigelb | d'oh, right | 09:42 |
bilalakhtar | Laibsch: that's wrong | 09:42 |
Laibsch | bilalakhtar: what's wrong? | 09:42 |
bilalakhtar | Laibsch: try using the dput ppa:FOO/BAR <source.changes> syntax | 09:42 |
Laibsch | OK | 09:43 |
Laibsch | doing as you suggest now | 09:43 |
Laibsch | let's see what happens | 09:43 |
Laibsch | nonetheless, if the .dput.cf is invalid, I'd like to fix that of course | 09:44 |
Laibsch | FWIW, this pattern has been working for me for years all the way to lucid | 09:44 |
bilalakhtar | Laibsch: incoming = ~r0lf/ubuntu/maverick should be incoming = ~r0lf/ppa/ubuntu | 09:44 |
bilalakhtar | Laibsch: no need to specify the distro release here, its specified in changelo | 09:45 |
bilalakhtar | *changelog | 09:45 |
Laibsch | nope | 09:45 |
Laibsch | that's the reason I have it there | 09:45 |
Laibsch | to force upload to a particular release | 09:45 |
Laibsch | no matter the changelog | 09:46 |
bilalakhtar | Laibsch: You cannot force an u | 09:46 |
bilalakhtar | sorry | 09:46 |
Laibsch | nonsense | 09:46 |
Laibsch | sorry ;-) | 09:46 |
Laibsch | you can | 09:46 |
Laibsch | and it's documented somewhere | 09:46 |
bilalakhtar | Laibsch: you might be able to, but you need to use ~r0lf/ppa/ubuntu/maverick then | 09:46 |
Laibsch | OK | 09:46 |
Laibsch | let me try that | 09:46 |
Laibsch | let's wait for the latest upload | 09:47 |
Laibsch | to see what happens | 09:47 |
bilalakhtar | Laibsch: its documented here https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA/Uploading#Using%20packages%20from%20other%20distributions | 09:48 |
Laibsch | thank you | 09:49 |
Laibsch | sed to the rescue | 09:49 |
Laibsch | bilalakhtar: uploading to incoming = ~r0lf/ppa/ubuntu/maverick now | 09:52 |
Laibsch | same result | 09:52 |
bilalakhtar | Laibsch: then I cannot help | 09:53 |
lifeless | bilalakhtar: so, again, check your logs that the mails have been sent | 09:54 |
bilalakhtar | lifeless: ah, I checked it soo many times, it HAS been sent | 09:54 |
bilalakhtar | lifeless: and it was signed by my registered GPG id | 09:55 |
bilalakhtar | lifeless: and I have been sending mails this wasy for quite a long time | 09:55 |
Laney | lifeless: I have seen it too: my mail was certainly sent | 09:55 |
lifeless | Laney: ok | 09:55 |
Ddorda | maxb, lifeless: i am logged in and not able to download it | 09:56 |
bilalakhtar | lifeless agreed when Laney said but didn't believe me | 09:56 |
Laney | Message-ID: <20100903165931.GK17896@ubuntu.lan> | 09:56 |
Laibsch | bilalakhtar: thanks. let's see if another dev has anything to say. | 09:56 |
Laney | one incident could be user error, two is probably a problem | 09:56 |
bilalakhtar | Now, its 2 hours since my mail was sent | 09:56 |
bilalakhtar | pity this had to happen on a weekend | 09:57 |
lifeless | bilalakhtar: I would have advised Laney as I advised you, when there are two distinct reports the probability of a single user problem goes down and a system one goes up | 09:57 |
Ddorda | lifeless: i'm not sure why, but bzr branch doesn't work to me. i know it works in other computers | 09:58 |
Laibsch | @all: why does an upload to "incoming = ~r0lf/ppa/ubuntu/maverick" get rejected based on "the source being already accepted in ubuntu/lucid" (which in fact is not even the case)? | 09:58 |
lifeless | Laney: whats the changelog suite set to ? | 09:58 |
bilalakhtar | Laibsch: is the same source package with same version already in ubuntu/lucid? | 09:58 |
lifeless | blah | 09:58 |
lifeless | Laibsch: ^ | 09:58 |
lifeless | so, I don't see any oopses from mail processing | 09:59 |
Laibsch | bilalakhtar: no | 09:59 |
Laibsch | and even then it would be strange | 09:59 |
lifeless | which means it is likely to be a datacentre incoming mail issue | 09:59 |
Laibsch | because I'm uploading to maverick! | 09:59 |
lifeless | I'm just going to ping the sysadmins | 09:59 |
Laibsch | bilalakhtar: the source used to be there yesterday, but I deleted it about 24 hours ago. so it should be cleared. | 09:59 |
=== lifeless changed the topic of #launchpad to: Bug mail may be having issues, being investigated | http://launchpad.net/ | Read https://help.launchpad.net/ for help | Help contact: - | Join https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | Launchpad is open source: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | ||
lifeless | ok, I've asked in our sysadmin channel | 10:02 |
lifeless | I'll pop back in a wee bit and see if anyone asnwered, and failing that escalate | 10:02 |
Laney | thanks | 10:02 |
lifeless | what mail provider did you send via | 10:03 |
lifeless | bilalakhtar: ^ and you? | 10:03 |
bilalakhtar | lifeless: yahoo | 10:04 |
lifeless | Laney: ^ | 10:04 |
Laney | lifeless: I run my own MTA | 10:04 |
lifeless | ok | 10:04 |
Laney | logs indicate it was sent | 10:04 |
lifeless | Laney: do you do direct delivery, or via ISP etc ? | 10:05 |
bilalakhtar | lifeless: mail is certainly going; I just sent it to the bugcontrol list (also hosted on launchpad) and it got into the list | 10:05 |
Laney | lifeless: direct | 10:05 |
bilalakhtar | and since I am subscribed, I got it back | 10:05 |
lifeless | Laney: ok, so you have an ack from the canonical server | 10:05 |
lifeless | suggests a mail processing issue | 10:05 |
lifeless | / cron job issue | 10:05 |
Laney | I never got a bounce or anything, indeed | 10:05 |
Laney | they could check their logs for that message ID I gave you | 10:06 |
lifeless | Laney: different folk can look at different bits | 10:06 |
lifeless | but yes, thanks. | 10:06 |
bilalakhtar | lifeless: Message-id: <1283585289.2528.1.camel@bilal-laptop> is my message id | 10:06 |
bilalakhtar | I've sent 2 mails to be precise, this is the id of the first one | 10:07 |
lifeless | bbiab | 10:08 |
=== Laney changed the topic of #launchpad to: Incoming bug mail may be having issues, being investigated | http://launchpad.net/ | Read https://help.launchpad.net/ for help | Help contact: - | Join https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | Launchpad is open source: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | ||
lifeless | I've escalated | 10:28 |
rajee | hai need help | 10:29 |
rajee | im unable to publish my openPGP key keyserver.ubuntu.com | 10:30 |
nigelb | rajee: what error do you get? | 10:30 |
rajee | im receiving error as gpgkeys: HTTP post error 7: couldn't connect to host | 10:31 |
rajee | gpg: keyserver internal error gpg: keyserver send failed: keyserver error | 10:31 |
rajee | i trying for past three days | 10:31 |
rajee | but im repeated with same errors | 10:31 |
nigelb | might want to raise a ticket at rt.ubuntu.com uname=ubuntu,password=ubuntu | 10:34 |
rajee | okay | 10:36 |
rajee | i logged in | 10:36 |
nigelb | just write the problem and the error | 10:36 |
rajee | okay | 10:37 |
rajee | where i need to write the problem ? | 10:38 |
nigelb | click on 'New Ticket' | 10:39 |
nigelb | top right bar I think | 10:39 |
rajee | yes. done | 10:39 |
shadeslayer | hi | 10:39 |
shadeslayer | what header does lp send when you click on https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdenetwork/4:4.5.1-0ubuntu2/+build/1945735/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-maverick-amd64.kdenetwork_4%3A4.5.1-0ubuntu2_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz | 10:39 |
rajee | nigelb : i explained my issue in the new ticket | 10:45 |
nigelb | do you have a number? | 10:46 |
nigelb | A ticket number that is | 10:46 |
rajee | but in requestors field, cc field what i need to add ? | 10:46 |
nigelb | rajee: in requestors, put your email ID | 10:47 |
rajee | okay | 10:47 |
nigelb | so you get updates on the issue, leave the cc empty | 10:47 |
rajee | okay | 10:47 |
lifeless | shadeslayer: why? (You can just look in your browser) | 10:50 |
shadeslayer | lifeless: i just found out the right place to look D | 10:50 |
nigelb | rajee: just talked to a sysadmin, keyservers do seem to work | 10:50 |
shadeslayer | :D | 10:50 |
rajee | nigelb : a ticket number is generated | 10:50 |
nigelb | rajee: yes, I saw and I asked an admin too | 10:51 |
rajee | nigelb : okay | 10:51 |
bilalakhtar | lifeless: You filed a new ticket in RT? Do we need to file a bug? | 10:51 |
rajee | nigelb : so what i have to proceed for publishing the key ? | 10:51 |
lifeless | bilalakhtar: huh? | 10:52 |
bilalakhtar | lifeless: about the incoming bug mail issue | 10:52 |
lifeless | no | 10:53 |
lifeless | neither | 10:53 |
thopiekar | how is support for 'nest-part' going foreward? | 10:53 |
lifeless | its being looked at | 10:53 |
nigelb | rajee: what is the command you're trying again? | 10:58 |
rajee | gpg --send-keys --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com followed by my key | 10:59 |
nigelb | rajee: behind a firewall or something? | 10:59 |
thopiekar | james_w`: ping | 11:00 |
rajee | nigelb : no | 11:00 |
nigelb | rajee: can you try gpg --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --search-keys 'nigelbabu@ubuntu.com' | 11:00 |
nigelb | if that works it could still be a problem with push | 11:01 |
rajee | yes one sec | 11:01 |
rajee | the same error | 11:02 |
rajee | gpg: searching for "nigelbabu@ubuntu.com" from hkp server keyserver.ubuntu.com | 11:02 |
rajee | gpgkeys: HTTP search error 7: couldn't connect to host | 11:02 |
rajee | gpg: key "nigelbabu@ubuntu.com" not found on keyserver | 11:02 |
rajee | gpg: keyserver internal error | 11:02 |
rajee | gpg: keyserver search failed: keyserver error | 11:02 |
nigelb | rajee: ah, something's wrong at your end | 11:02 |
nigelb | that command works fine for me | 11:02 |
rajee | oh okay | 11:03 |
rajee | nigelb : thanks yar | 11:09 |
nigelb | np | 11:10 |
lifeless | Laney: bilalakhtar: elmo thinks its fixed. | 11:16 |
=== lifeless changed the topic of #launchpad to: http://launchpad.net/ | Read https://help.launchpad.net/ for help | Help contact: - | Join https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | Launchpad is open source: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | ||
bilalakhtar | lifeless: That was quick! | 11:17 |
Laney | lifeless: sweet, thanks! Was there a problem then? | 11:17 |
bilalakhtar | Must have been ^^ | 11:17 |
lifeless | appears to have been an index file that caused a large malloc when parsing/processing it on an internal mail server. | 11:18 |
lifeless | we don't know if that was just a pathological internal structure, bug, corruption or any other cause possibility you could come up with. | 11:18 |
bilalakhtar | hmm, now 2 new dup bugs are going to be filed for package gkdebconf | 11:19 |
bilalakhtar | and 2 more comments on a plymouth bug | 11:19 |
lifeless | is it ok? | 11:38 |
lucidfox | I've uploaded the Russian ru.po translation file for my project, but it's listed as "Needs Review", and both "Approved" and "Imported" are greyed out | 11:50 |
lucidfox | any idea why? | 11:50 |
lucidfox | (well, not uploaded, it was auto-imported from bzr) | 11:51 |
bilalakhtar | lucidfox: wait for it to get auto-approved (up to a day) | 12:10 |
bilalakhtar | I have also faced similar problems | 12:10 |
G | wow is it just me or is mail from launchpad delayed a little | 12:36 |
G | oh not as bad now | 12:37 |
=== dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | ||
=== dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | ||
oo | How does a bug become associated with a particular ubuntu version, would I do that by tagging "maverick" for example? | 14:08 |
=== dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | ||
=== dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | ||
Laibsch | oo: this is a question for #ubuntu-bugs | 15:46 |
Laibsch | but to answer your question, any open ticket is always meant to be open against the latest development version, maverick in this case | 15:47 |
Laibsch | I tag with maverick or lucid if I've verified it exists in that particular release | 15:48 |
=== dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | ||
* shadeslayer points to bug 630259 | 16:10 | |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 630259 in Launchpad itself "content-encoding should be gzip (affected: 1, heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/630259 | 16:10 |
=== dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | ||
JoshBrown | What kind of credit do you give a patch submitter? Do you author the commit in their name, add a comment `patch by Bob` to the commit, or what? | 17:53 |
shadeslayer | JoshBrown: patch by Bob | 18:06 |
shadeslayer | one sec | 18:06 |
shadeslayer | JoshBrown: https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/k3b/2.0.1-1ubuntu2 | 18:07 |
JoshBrown | shadeslayer: Thanks. | 18:12 |
shadeslayer | np | 18:12 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
=== bpeel_away is now known as bpeel |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!