[00:44] <lamont> ScottK: adare dies randomly.  lucid hates ppc.  karmic hates ppc, just differently.
[00:44] <lamont> I'm thinking I'll upgrade ross to lucid, too
[00:45] <lamont> just not this weekend
[00:45] <ScottK> OK
[00:49] <lamont> so... file-roller_2.31.91-0ubuntu1
[00:49] <lamont> and welcome back, adare
[00:50] <lamont> pretty sure gutenprint would build faster (esp on armel) if it weren't doing -j16 regardless of CPU count
[01:32] <ScottK> Might make sense to have a cap for armel.
[01:45] <lamont> amd64 didn't like it either
[01:45] <lamont> the machines whine at me when they do things like that
[01:49]  * ScottK wonders if policy has anything to say about not using ridiculous values of -j.
[01:49] <ScottK> (not enough to actually look it up though)
[02:27] <lamont> QMDi10
[02:27] <lamont> gar
[06:00] <ScottK> lamont: I got bored/impatient and mashed retry on a large stack of packages.  I think I got them all so don't be suprised if your script doesn't pick up much when you run it.
[18:10] <Laney> cjwatson: Would you be able to run some syncs out-of-band for me, please? We've a few new source/binary packages to get into Maverick for Banshee by default on UNE and it's really rather pressing now
[18:13] <Laney> ScottK: alternatively, do you have some free cycles to NEW some stuff if we upload them manually?
[19:00] <ScottK> Laney: If it's a no change sync from Debian, yes.
[19:01] <Laney> ScottK: they are, thanks
[19:01] <Laney> I'll ping you when they are in the queue
[19:01] <ScottK> Great.
[19:37] <Laney> ScottK: gtk-sharp-beans gio-sharp gudev-sharp-1.0 in NEW
[19:38] <ScottK> OK.  I'll try to have a look in a bit.
[19:38] <Laney> thanks
[20:21] <cjwatson> sorry, was too late
[20:21] <Laney> no worries
[20:22] <Laney> feeling the time pressure on this one. :)
[20:22] <cjwatson> actually, I see at least gtk-sharp-beans and gudev-sharp-1.0 are still in NEW
[20:22] <cjwatson> mind if I reject those and sync them?  that way I can process them without having to think
[20:22] <Laney> gio is only binary NEW
[20:23] <Laney> yes, please do
[20:23] <Laney> . o O ( these all belong in the cli-mono packageset too )
[20:23] <cjwatson> Laney: from unstable?
[20:23] <cjwatson> oh, and remind me of your LP id
[20:23] <Laney> I think they all were
[20:23] <Laney> laney
[20:24] <Laney> gtk-sharp-beans might have been exp
[20:24] <cjwatson> not even seeing it in experimental
[20:25] <Laney> probably awaits dinstall
[20:26] <Laney> it was NEWed this afternoon
[20:26] <cjwatson> ah
[20:26] <cjwatson> done gudev-sharp-1.0
[20:29] <cjwatson> and done gtk-sharp-beans
[20:30] <Laney> thanks so much
[20:31] <Laney> I think those are the only source NEW, there's gio-sharp in binary NEW and libgpod to come also to binary NEW soon (but that's main so I can't upload it)
[20:33] <Laney> cjwatson: I'll mail you regarding the packageset changes, there's no urgency on those
[20:44] <slangasek> ogra: there don't appear to be package list files accompanying the preinstalled images; could you fix that?
[20:44] <slangasek> ogra: (would make it easier to triage bug #630825, since I don't know offhand which uboot is on the omap image)
[20:44] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 630825 in ubuntu-cdimage "Preinstalled Maverick netbook image won't boot on Gumstix Overo (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/630825
[20:45] <slangasek> looks like it's probably u-boot-omap3, though :)
[20:45] <cjwatson> would simplify some of the cdimage scripts if there were a list file, too :)
[20:46] <slangasek> heh
[20:47] <cjwatson> I didn't have time to whine about that on Thursday when I was Just Making It Work Damnit
[21:45]  * ScottK2 fell asleep on the couch instead of doing Laney's New.
[21:45] <Laney> ScottK: I think you picked the right option
[21:45] <Laney> there's still some binary new available if you want it
[21:46] <ScottK> Perhaps in a bit.  Need to go pick up one of the kids.
[21:48] <stgraber> cjwatson: Hello, did you get that e-mail I sent you on Wednesday about the edubuntu gfxboot splash being 24bit instead of 8bit (and so, not showing up at all) ? (just checking, no rush ;))
[21:59] <cjwatson> oh, yeah, I did, remind me tomorrow
[22:06] <stgraber> ok, thanks