| micahg | Dimmuxx: beta update in topic :) | 01:19 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimmuxx | micahg: nice :) | 01:26 |
| fta2 | chrisccoulson, mdeslaur: fyi: [Branch ~chromium-team/chromium-browser/channels] Rev 269: linux/stable (6.0.472.53 -> 6.0.472.55) | 08:09 |
| fta2 | micahg, didn't you tell me that the icetea6 plugin works fine without the LD_LIBRARY_PATH workaround??? | 13:02 |
| fta2 | bug 633075 | 13:03 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 633075 in chromium-browser (Ubuntu) "icedtea6 plugin will crash chromium-browser (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/633075 | 13:03 |
| fta2 | jdstrand, fyi: [Branch ~chromium-team/chromium-browser/channels] Rev 269: linux/stable (6.0.472.53 -> 6.0.472.55) | 13:21 |
| jdstrand | fta2: does this mean we need to reupload chromium or will we continue to wait on the SRU process and upload that after? | 13:25 |
| jdstrand | fta2: btw, the TB has been talking about chromium, but it isn't decided yet | 13:26 |
| fta2 | jdstrand, it looks like a bunch regression fixes, nothing security related | 13:26 |
| fta2 | http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/2010/09/stable-beta-channel-updates.html | 13:27 |
| jdstrand | I would say we could push that to -updates after, but I think we all know by the time what is in -proposed hits -security google will have released a new security fix release :P | 13:28 |
| fta2 | jdstrand, there's no activity in sec channel since the last big update, so no idea when the next critical update will be | 13:30 |
| jdstrand | well, it seems getting what we have out sooner is more important than those bug fixes | 13:32 |
| jdstrand | I'd be happy to upload to -proposed though. ultimately, it is the same amount of work (since I would do that upload to -proposed wither way) | 13:32 |
| jdstrand | s/wither/either/ | 13:32 |
| fta2 | jdstrand, why is the TB taking so long to decide? | 13:52 |
| chrisccoulson | fta2 - i think it was me who told you that the icedtea plugin works without the LD_LIBRARY_PATH workaround | 14:16 |
| fta2 | chrisccoulson, ok, then what is this new bug about? i don't understand | 14:17 |
| chrisccoulson | fta2 - which new bug? | 14:18 |
| chrisccoulson | oh | 14:18 |
| chrisccoulson | hang on :) | 14:18 |
| fta2 | bug 633075 | 14:18 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 633075 in chromium-browser (Ubuntu) "icedtea6 plugin will crash chromium-browser (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/633075 | 14:18 |
| chrisccoulson | hmmm :/ | 14:19 |
| jdstrand | fta2: I don't know | 14:19 |
| chrisccoulson | fta2 - ok, i'll have a look at exactly what was changed in a bit | 14:19 |
| fta2 | chrisccoulson, jdstrand: http://www.iuculano.it/it/linux/debian/chromium-browser-removed-from-testing/ | 14:39 |
| fta2 | chrisccoulson, jdstrand: oops, http://www.iuculano.it/en/linux/debian/chromium-browser-removed-from-testing/ | 14:40 |
| chrisccoulson | fta - interesting | 14:43 |
| chrisccoulson | wow, dpkg is so incredibly slow | 14:50 |
| chrisccoulson | all i want to do is install a few language packs and it's taken nearly 40 minutes so far | 14:50 |
| chrisccoulson | grrrrrr | 14:50 |
| fta2 | the download part or the install part? | 14:52 |
| fta2 | jdstrand, do you think people are using -security but not -upgrades? | 14:55 |
| jdstrand | fta2: yes. -security without -updates is a supported configuration | 14:55 |
| chrisccoulson | fta2 - unpacking is slow. and then dpkg runs all the triggers after installing each language pack too :/ | 14:57 |
| chrisccoulson | isn't it meant to do that all in one go at the end? | 14:57 |
| roy_ | Is the newest Firefox called Namoroka ? | 15:41 |
| Dimmuxx | roy_: that's 3.6.x | 15:43 |
| roy_ | Because I added the ppa for the ubuntu mozilla daily build team and it updated my firefox which is now named as Namoroka | 15:44 |
| roy_ | I am just abit confused why it changed the name from firefox to Namoroka | 15:45 |
| Dimmuxx | the daily ppa updates your stable 3.6.x release to an unstable 3.6.x daily build | 15:46 |
| roy_ | I was trying to get firefox 4 ? | 15:47 |
| Dimmuxx | then you should install firefox-4.0 | 15:48 |
| Dimmuxx | I would recommend waiting for the beta ppa though | 15:48 |
| roy_ | ok thanks | 15:52 |
| fta | chrisccoulson, did you have a look at the ch/icetea6 bug? | 16:07 |
| chrisccoulson | fta - not yet, i've got some other things i need to finish first | 16:07 |
| fta | k | 16:07 |
| fta | hm, a new libvpx | 17:02 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: I'll SRU the gjs/gnome-shell fix for lucid over the weekend | 17:08 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| fta | firefox doesn't have translations for its desktop file?? | 17:13 |
| micahg | fta: well, there are some | 17:13 |
| micahg | the dailies don't | 17:13 |
| fta | i see none in /usr/share/applications/firefox.desktop | 17:14 |
| micahg | I have them on my ssytem | 17:14 |
| fta | that's from umd | 17:15 |
| micahg | ah, yeah, they won't have it | 17:15 |
| fta | wgy? | 17:15 |
| fta | why? | 17:15 |
| micahg | not branded as Firefox | 17:15 |
| micahg | need different translations | 17:15 |
| dpm | fta, micahg, chrisccoulson: ah, that reminds me... I've been collecting some translations for the desktop file in FF and Thunderbird. If I file a bug, could you include them by NonLanguagePackTranslationDeadline on the 16th? They are here: | 17:15 |
| dpm | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Translations/Wanted/FirefoxDesktop | 17:16 |
| micahg | dpm: yeah, I can take care of it this weekend | 17:16 |
| fta | same for chromium: bug 631670 | 17:16 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 631670 in chromium-browser (Ubuntu) "Chromium .desktop file is not using translations (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Low,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/631670 | 17:16 |
| dpm | micahg, no rush, I'd like to give translators time until the nonlangpack deadline, as it fits more with the translations workflow, if that's ok with you | 17:17 |
| dpm | fta, yeah, same for that one, thanks :) | 17:17 |
| micahg | dpm: k, I can do an upload tuesday night then | 17:17 |
| fta | dpm, i've just merged the 1st batch | 17:17 |
| dpm | micahg, fta, it's awesome that you are merging them already - I just want to make sure if it's ok with you to receive the last batch on the 16th on NonLanguagePackDeadline | 17:19 |
| micahg | dpm: yes, but that's supposed to be by UTC midnight of the 16th everything is supposed to be uploaded already | 17:19 |
| micahg | dpm: I can do an upload around 0400 UTC on the 16th, and I hope the archive isn't frozen by then | 17:20 |
| micahg | dpm: chromium you have more leeway since it's in universe | 17:20 |
| dpm | micahg, that'd be great, even if you want to do the upload on the 15th. Time for translations is not that critical in that case, as long it is close to the nonlangpackdeadline | 17:21 |
| dpm | I can tell translators to have them ready by the 15th | 17:22 |
| micahg | dpm: that'll be fine, I'll upload 16th at 0400 UTC (15th 10PM local time :)) | 17:28 |
| dpm | micahg, awesome, thanks! | 17:29 |
| micahg | dpm: np | 17:29 |
| chrisccoulson | hmmm, firefox needs a source patch to support localized values for spellchecker.dictionary :( | 17:51 |
| chrisccoulson | i suppose i can at least send that upstream | 17:52 |
| kees | fta: say, can I convince you to build chromium with PIE? | 17:55 |
| fta | kees, PIE? as in -fPIE? | 17:56 |
| kees | fta: yeah | 17:58 |
| kees | fta: could be done either via hardening-wrapper (easy) or via hardening-includes (less easy but still easy) | 17:59 |
| fta | kees, should i expect regressions? | 18:00 |
| fta | kees, i guess i can give it a try with the dailies... | 18:01 |
| kees | fta: if so, it's a horrible bug in the compiler. or chromium is doing something unholy. which, I guess is possible. | 18:02 |
| kees | fta: but in normal conditions, it should be fine. | 18:02 |
| kees | fta: you can use "hardening-check" in the hardening-includes package to validate the results. | 18:03 |
| fta | kees, hmm.. i use the same packaging for the backports.. down to hardy, i guess it's a problem | 18:15 |
| fta | oh, hardening-wrapper 1.11 is in hardy | 18:17 |
| kees | yeah, should be fine even in hardy. | 18:18 |
| kees | and if it's not, I'd be happy to help with the rules file :) | 18:18 |
| fta | kees, chromium runs in a sandbox, i'm not sure what kind of benefit we can obtain with this.. | 18:20 |
| kees | fta: my understanding is that the sandbox isn't actually enabled on linux yet. | 18:30 |
| fta | kees, of course it is. the suid one. /usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser-sandbox | 18:31 |
| fta | (not the seccomp one) | 18:32 |
| fta | http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=36133 | 18:33 |
| kees | ah, okay, it's doing containers, not seccomp. okay, cool. I didn't know there were two. still, PIE is yet-another-protection. :) | 18:35 |
| fta | i'm doing a test build in a pbuilder, but i'm not sure it's even being used | 18:38 |
| fta | kees, it's using ccache??? | 19:11 |
| kees | fta: what? | 19:13 |
| fta | kees, hardening-wrapper | 19:13 |
| kees | no | 19:13 |
| kees | it's just a wrapper | 19:13 |
| fta | or is it pbuilder? | 19:14 |
| fta | cube:~/chromium-browser-7.0.519.0~svn20100908r58782# hardening-check debian/chromium-browser/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser | 19:15 |
| fta | debian/chromium-browser/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser: | 19:15 |
| fta | Position Independent Executable: yes | 19:15 |
| fta | Stack protected: yes | 19:15 |
| fta | Fortify Source functions: yes | 19:15 |
| fta | Read-only relocations: yes | 19:15 |
| fta | Immediate binding: yes | 19:15 |
| fta | kees, ^^ | 19:16 |
| kees | \o/ | 19:20 |
| fta | http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ba1BqJ4S2M | 19:43 |
| fta | micahg, there's a new libvpx, it seems to bring lots of improvements, perf wise | 19:59 |
| fta | i put it in ucd | 20:00 |
| micahg | fta: thanks, I think we're going to stick with in-source vpx for Firefox, but I can check with chrisccoulson | 20:01 |
| micahg | fta: is it worth getting into maverick? | 20:03 |
| fta | micahg, would be nice imho, but slomo is the owner | 20:03 |
| micahg | fta: oh | 20:04 |
| fta | i'm auto-importing it from the gst-dev ppa and i auto-backport it for all arches for the 4 chromium ppas | 20:05 |
| fta | something like this in a daily cron: http://paste.ubuntu.com/490518/ | 20:06 |
| chrisccoulson | yeah, we'll probably stick with in-source vpx for firefox | 20:23 |
| fta | is firefox built with PIC now? | 21:26 |
| micahg | fta: PIC or PIE? | 21:26 |
| fta | PIE sorrt | 21:27 |
| fta | y | 21:27 |
| micahg | fta: yes, it's been that way since Lucid IIRC | 21:27 |
| fta | k | 21:28 |
| fta | BUGabundo, hey! | 21:45 |
| BUGabundo | hey fta | 21:45 |
| BUGabundo | do tell | 21:45 |
| fta | ? | 21:46 |
| fta | http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ba1BqJ4S2M | 21:46 |
| fta | funny | 21:46 |
| BUGabundo | fta: plenty | 21:49 |
| BUGabundo | let me laugh at a blank screen | 21:49 |
| fta | ? | 21:49 |
| BUGabundo | or when ever chromium works | 21:49 |
| fta | it's fine here | 21:49 |
| BUGabundo | 7.0.519.0 (58782) Ubuntu 10.10 | 21:50 |
| fta | same | 21:50 |
| BUGabundo | let me do a clean profile and gdb | 21:51 |
| BUGabundo | $ chromium-browser -g --temp-profile http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ba1BqJ4S2M | 21:51 |
| BUGabundo | it does work :S | 21:51 |
| BUGabundo | flash | 21:52 |
| BUGabundo | my profile is set to HTML5 | 21:52 |
| fta | html5 too here | 21:55 |
| BUGabundo | fta: its working now | 22:03 |
| BUGabundo | it was noscripting addong | 22:03 |
| fta | i don't use that | 22:04 |
| BUGabundo | testing it for two days | 22:06 |
| fta | kees, did some testing of this chromium pie build (maverick 32), worked fine. just committed it in the daily branch (hoping it will work for the backports), next daily planed in a few hours. if no regression emerges, i'll land it to the other branches, and ship it in the next stable update | 23:58 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!